Yes, they made mistakes. But the quest for knowledge has always made mistakes. I would rather that these were made and the quest continued rather than accept what has been taught, and proved to be somewhat incorrect, for a long time. Without this quest, humanity would never have progressed beyond cave life. I find your clinging to the "knowledge" from a time when there was little real investigation of the real truth to be very much against the reality that has been based upon logic, investigations, and what is the most likely true facts.
Real search for knowledge? Nothing has changed, the consensus is as rigid as ever, scientists who write papers out side of an accepted world view are ostracized and shunned, often their livelihoods threatened. Much of science is built upon assumptions and once those are a part of 'investigation', it is not science. Mainstream science is all about interpreting data to fit a presupposed paradigm and rejecting anything else regardless of evidence. Your statement about 'cave life' and its inference that mankind is millions of years old when there is extremely strong evidence this is not possible. The reason most people like you think as you do is you have been indoctrinated with the official consensus and believe it as fact when it is not. If it was a fact why are highly qualified scientists with impressive credentials presenting evidence to the contrary? Observation is a critical tool for science and observation has shown for thousands of years that information always necessitates a mind, the information in DNA is the most complex ever discovered, it can be read in multiple directions, utilizes encryption, and bizarrely for a process that supposedly relies on random mutations has a sophisticated error correction system. It also has the claim of the worlds most compact data storage method and if this data were written into books would stretch to the moon and back 500 times. Despite all of this the consensus is it created itself over millions of years, despite the absolute fact information, especially purposeful complexly arranged information, is only known to come from a mind. What sort of mind is required for information that is so complex it cannot be arranged in the method DNA utilises, even using todays supercomputers? Mainstream science simply ignores this problem and 'clings' to its presupposed world view.
Friend, you are wrong. Darwinian evolution is mathematically impossible. The wait time for selection of even minor beneficial changes exceed the age of the universe. This means random mutations don't improve things ever! I urge you to read books by Meyer, Behe, and Axe - all of them accomplished PhDs in relevant fields. You're welcome.
The quest for science taught in America's public school's education system has been sadly 'strictly' filtered through the Royal Society of England that was established in 1660 as a result of individuals born in England, for instance, Francis Bacon's writings like the "The New Atlantis" published in 1626. They've been cheating truth by the fabrication of the false teachings of evolution even before Darwin who was also born in England. Isaac Newton, father of modern science and James Hutton, father of modern geology all of whom were born in England. I'm from Scottish and English descent and it took my whole life to discover this huge deception called modern science perpetrated on the western world. We're experiencing the British alien invasion of our minds in real time. Like George Washington as with us today, our fight is still against the British.
@@theHentySkepticGregor Mendel, "The Father of Genetics' should be taught in school along with these Discovery Institute heros instead of Darwin's false claims of evolution, don't you think?
Here is a list of some of the most prominent scientists that have ever lived and believed in the 'lies of the bible', I wonder why that is? Would it be they understood the immense complexity of both the universe and life necessitated a supreme creator rather than believe in a fantasy that goes against all known laws? Which came first 'DNA' or proteins'? Science can never answer this but God can, he created all living things complete, with the ability to replicate and adapt. Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle, Nicolas Copernicus, Michael Faraday, Galileo Galilei, James Joule, Lord Kelvin Calvin Thompson, Johannes Kepler, James Clark Maxwell, Isaac Newton, Blaise Pascal, Louis Pasteur, Lord Rayleigh, Nikola Tesla, there are many many more.
What a boring talk. By ze way ....... The bible is a great book. I love it. It is gods intelligence test. He wants to see who falls for those fairytale stories. The meek, the dim-witted who believe that .... will go to heaven. There they will be lectured for a 1ooo years on logic, evry day. Whilst the rest of us free thinkers rest in peace.
More like free thinkers go to Hell. You aren't resting in peace unless you're hanging out with Jesus in Heaven. I do agree that the Bible is a great book though.
You fell for everything was created by nothing, complexity and information pops into existence without the source being a mind, things that have never ever been observed in the history of mankind, observation is the foundation of science, so think about this, fear not though, your stupidity will be forgiven if you let God into your life.
Almost missed this gem. Blessings
Yes, they made mistakes. But the quest for knowledge has always made mistakes. I would rather that these were made and the quest continued rather than accept what has been taught, and proved to be somewhat incorrect, for a long time. Without this quest, humanity would never have progressed beyond cave life.
I find your clinging to the "knowledge" from a time when there was little real investigation of the real truth to be very much against the reality that has been based upon logic, investigations, and what is the most likely true facts.
Real search for knowledge? Nothing has changed, the consensus is as rigid as ever, scientists who write papers out side of an accepted world view are ostracized and shunned, often their livelihoods threatened. Much of science is built upon assumptions and once those are a part of 'investigation', it is not science. Mainstream science is all about interpreting data to fit a presupposed paradigm and rejecting anything else regardless of evidence. Your statement about 'cave life' and its inference that mankind is millions of years old when there is extremely strong evidence this is not possible. The reason most people like you think as you do is you have been indoctrinated with the official consensus and believe it as fact when it is not. If it was a fact why are highly qualified scientists with impressive credentials presenting evidence to the contrary? Observation is a critical tool for science and observation has shown for thousands of years that information always necessitates a mind, the information in DNA is the most complex ever discovered, it can be read in multiple directions, utilizes encryption, and bizarrely for a process that supposedly relies on random mutations has a sophisticated error correction system. It also has the claim of the worlds most compact data storage method and if this data were written into books would stretch to the moon and back 500 times. Despite all of this the consensus is it created itself over millions of years, despite the absolute fact information, especially purposeful complexly arranged information, is only known to come from a mind. What sort of mind is required for information that is so complex it cannot be arranged in the method DNA utilises, even using todays supercomputers? Mainstream science simply ignores this problem and 'clings' to its presupposed world view.
Friend, you are wrong. Darwinian evolution is mathematically impossible. The wait time for selection of even minor beneficial changes exceed the age of the universe. This means random mutations don't improve things ever! I urge you to read books by Meyer, Behe, and Axe - all of them accomplished PhDs in relevant fields. You're welcome.
The quest for science taught in America's public school's education system has been sadly 'strictly' filtered through the Royal Society of England that was established in 1660 as a result of individuals born in England, for instance, Francis Bacon's writings like the "The New Atlantis" published in 1626. They've been cheating truth by the fabrication of the false teachings of evolution even before Darwin who was also born in England. Isaac Newton, father of modern science and James Hutton, father of modern geology all of whom were born in England. I'm from Scottish and English descent and it took my whole life to discover this huge deception called modern science perpetrated on the western world. We're experiencing the British alien invasion of our minds in real time. Like George Washington as with us today, our fight is still against the British.
@@theHentySkepticGregor Mendel, "The Father of Genetics' should be taught in school along with these Discovery Institute heros instead of Darwin's false claims of evolution, don't you think?
There is a huge difference between errors and the out and out lies of that work of fiction called the bible
Here is a list of some of the most prominent scientists that have ever lived and believed in the 'lies of the bible', I wonder why that is? Would it be they understood the immense complexity of both the universe and life necessitated a supreme creator rather than believe in a fantasy that goes against all known laws? Which came first 'DNA' or proteins'? Science can never answer this but God can, he created all living things complete, with the ability to replicate and adapt.
Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle, Nicolas Copernicus, Michael Faraday, Galileo Galilei, James Joule, Lord Kelvin Calvin Thompson, Johannes Kepler, James Clark Maxwell, Isaac Newton, Blaise Pascal, Louis Pasteur, Lord Rayleigh, Nikola Tesla, there are many many more.
I invite you to do more research on those lies. I have found all Archaeology to match up with the Bible.
What a boring talk.
By ze way .......
The bible is a great book.
I love it. It is gods intelligence test.
He wants to see who falls for those fairytale stories.
The meek, the dim-witted who believe that .... will go to heaven. There they will be lectured for a 1ooo years on logic, evry day.
Whilst the rest of us free thinkers rest in peace.
More like free thinkers go to Hell. You aren't resting in peace unless you're hanging out with Jesus in Heaven. I do agree that the Bible is a great book though.
You fell for everything was created by nothing, complexity and information pops into existence without the source being a mind, things that have never ever been observed in the history of mankind, observation is the foundation of science, so think about this, fear not though, your stupidity will be forgiven if you let God into your life.