Teacher Being Evicted From S.F. Mission District Apartment For Using Appliances
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 июн 2016
- In what is believed to be a first-of-its kind San Francisco eviction case, a kindergarten teacher was served with an eviction notice because the use of appliances in what her new landlords called an illegal in-law apartment. Michelle Griego reports. (6-24-16)
Sound like a way they can get out old occupants, raise the rent and get someone new that pays more. It's crap
That is exactly what this is.
What is wrong with that? It’s a business not a charity.
@@RFJersey And your response is exactly what is wrong with this country.
Progressive Guy Why don’t you give her housing then? “Progressives” like being generous with other people’s money.
Jerry Dalrymple How many apartments do you give out for free?Since you don’t worship money and all.
I’m amazed that a teacher is actually surviving in San Francisco
thaintriguing1 with her daughter! Wow...
Maybe she teaches at a private school.
And a dog
She was living there for years. It's probably rent controlled
Didn’t they say it was $1,700 a month? I live in the Bay Area- NOTHING is even close to that cheap in SF unless it’s rent controlled. An average SF studio is something like $2,600 a month
Sooooo just so we're all on the same page here : this teacher was paying $1700 a month. That's $20,400 a year for the past 9 years. Grand total : $183,600....for an illegal unit that was not up-to-code. BUT, those landlords had no problem taking that money----year after year---for an apartment that I'm pretty sure they knew wasn't up to code....
The greed of these landlords truly knows no boundaries....
I think you misunderstood the story. The old landlord sold the house. The couple that purchased the house either wants to get her out of there so they can renovate and raise the rent for the next tenant or just live there themselves. Either way, they went about it the wrong way and SF is a shithole.
@@stop.juststop ReeeeeeeeEeee. 🐷🐷
@@davidanderson7782 Ok. Makes perfect sense. Thanks for adding so much to this conversation.
Myelectric Bluechevy it is the greed of tenants that passed this oppressive law. The landlord is the victim here.
or the stupidity of the yemnant
How dare people use their coffee maker and TV.
Theologically Deficient If the owner is paying utilities I can see why they would have restrictions. Maybe you can offer your neighbor free electricity.
You can use them but I need 1200 more a mounth..
@Sergio Aguirre Isn't that sad. Thier are some apartments in Dallas Texas that you are not allowed to use the water excepr for flushing your toilet between the hour's of 12 am and 5 am. Get this .It was challenged in court an the apartments won. Strange..
allison chang that is messed up. That's why when I rent I really read what kind of tenants they're looking for, some landlords are just dicks like that
@Sergio Aguirre I know. How inconsiderate of the renter to want to cook, clean, refrigerate food, watch the TV, use lighting, listen to the radio, go on the internet. Bastards!
Sounds like a landlord problem, not her’s.
Indeed.Subverting building codes in favor of many illegal bucks.Judge Judy would hang these ' owners'
out to dry, right after she awarded all previous rent paid returned to tenant.The owner is
a penny anti con who is disrupting the tenants life bc they're trying to slither out of their legal responsibility.Sounds like a criminal to me hiding behind a 'damnable frivelous' lawsuit that a shyster lawyer drew up.Hang 'em high Judge for causing duress to an innocent tenant.
@@pamelaturner7927 It's not their responsibility to cover the missing rent for these people... That makes no sense Pamela, they own it, renters are renting. No one should be forced to rent out what they own. That's absurd.
It sounds more like a city problem to me. The landlords are acting under pressure from new city ordinances which were written without regard for the tenants or owners they would be affecting. How can you pass a law condemning electrical units as unsafe without a plan for bringing buildings up to code?
Greedy landlords. ....I hope all tenants won't pay anymore the rent....Who too much want less get
No wonder homelessness is becoming the new norm in America.
California not most of the U.S.
@@lotusjaggarage2989 but isn't it happening all over America too?
@@janejane6754 yes there is but i would say its better than Europe for most of America with the exception of NY, CA, and OR most states have fairly affordable houses you can buy a mobile in texas for about 30k
@@lotusjaggarage2989 - a 30k trailer? Bad idea. First: where are you going to put it? Water and sewer? Throw in a couple of thousands more for construction. Insurance? Gotta have a foundation. Easily 10k. Going to rent a spot? Yeah, bad idea for more reasons than I can type, first being additional cost. Then there is resale value. Mobile homes have jack-shit in resale value. I can go on, but it's pointless. Moral of the story: mobile homes are a bad investment, for one of the largest purchases in a person's life.
San Francisco is the highest rent in America you can't use them as a comparison for the rest of the country if you're willing to work and not spend your money on drugs you won't be homeless unless you're one of the few with extenuating circumstances
1 million for that house that used to be for the working class???? this is nuts
Noel Garland best part is it’s built on a old dump
@Aaron Stephenson that's great for you Aaron but holy shit a million dollars thats insane
To live in a sewer over run with hobos and junkies sounds like a deal.
"This is nuts...." No. This is San Francisco.
I live in a small town in Ohio, that spot here is 120K give or take 30Gs.
The land owner purchased the problem. They were on notice. They should of just bought her out of the contract. Instead they lawyered up.
Should of?
I dont understand why someone buys a low income housing and their first thought is to make everyone homeless. Dude you know what your buying before you do
They "inherited" the home.
Technically the tenant isn’t even suppose to be their in the first place since it was a known illegal apartment. Also many tenants refused to be bought out since they can’t afford to find a cheaper place to live in SF. Even if they gave the teacher the typical buy out amount of 10k it wouldn’t even last her half years of rent in SF.
The teacher isn’t stupid. She knows her rent is cheap in SF standards. She also knew it was an illegal apartment to begin with.
Most the landlord could to do wait her out and refuse to take rent for half a year. Sure they lose money but they also won’t be accepting rent so it’s a legal eviction afterward.
HeatJourney it’s not a low income housing. The teacher isn’t living in an apartment she is living in an illegal in-law unit at a single family home. She isn’t suppose to be there in the first place. It was a known illegal unit to begin with and was created by the previous home owner.
Technically the new landlord just inherited the mess. The tenant technically is the one breaking the law. In some cities knowingly renting an illegal unit can be charged by association especially since rent is cheap.
How can you give them 3 days to get out. That's morally wrong. Need at least a month to find a place and move all your stuff.
I know, its crazy.
Its 3 days to just leave she has a chance to go and appear in court to fight the eviction she doesn't have to leave until after the court makes a rulings
@@Shonuff42080
Good, I didn't know that.
I hope she wins the case.
She'll get at least a free year, maybe $140k to move out. The lawyers will get paid in the end.
@@nickhill8612 She needs to counter Sue.For unknowingly being subjected to living in a unit that could have endangered her life due to owner not heeding by electrical codes
set forth in building codes.It's an OP(Owner Problem) not a TP(Tenent Problem.
The Mayor of Berkeley won't build tiny homes for the homeless because that would be " too permanent".
So she wants homelessness. Not a permanent lack of homelessness.
If she has been living there for 9 years, clearly the apartment’s infrastructure is up to the challenge of her appliances and water use habits.
The landlord's in San Francisco are making everyone who pays less than 6000 a month homeless.
$1700 in San Francisco is rent control prices. This is just an excuse to get her out so that the landlords can rent it at at least $3500
Francisco Lopez Nah; I disagree. The landlord just wants the renter booted so they can be the sole occupants of the house. This is the most common reason that game is played to harass the renters in those in-law shacks. The “landlords” are regular families that are trying to own their own property. Too bad the mayor’s office and city council will not support the construction of affordable housing within city limits. They continue to deny building permits on a regular basis.
@@chipjumper Agreed $3500 doesn't even make a dent in a $1.7m mortgage
The new owner should have done their research before buying
Wow!! These landlords are becoming dirtier and dirtier recently 😲
Owners should be required to bring them up to code. Period
they want her out so they can fix it and charge more
wow no sh*t cap
Haha, fix it?! Literally the only thing the landlord will do is change the 1 to a 6 in the 1700 dollar rent.
The lawyer said " they don't want to be landlords".... umm then why did they buy the house knowing she was in it?
They own the house now, so it's not up to the tenant.
Lol most houses have people living in them when you buy them hahaha
Riun Larose Maybe in California that's normal... That's not exactly the norm for other places. Some people buy houses that are being lived-in, but its usually the "tenants/homeowners" that are selling. Some people also buy new construction, which is less likely in a large city like this with tons of building codes and laws restricting new developments, but it's not very often that you go to buy a house from the homeowner & there's a separate tenant in an illegal apartment. lol
Riun Larose Also that lady is getting a steal for the price in rent. It sucks that she has to move, but thats what happens when you're paying way below market value for rent.
Reb: an "in-law-apartment" is not a commercial apartment (by any stretch of the imagination.) It is created for elderly, the in-law that can support themselves. There must be a shared door or opening between the main house and in-law apartment for it to even BE an in-law apartment. We are not talking a separate residence here. A separate residence means that the property one which both the house and the in-law sit must be zoned for commercial building, not just residential.They bought the house expecting to kick her out or (failing that) she would leave on her own. Since she can not rent a 2-bedroom apartment anywhere in the Bay Area for $1700 (or anything close to that) of course she is forcing them to evict them. This is just about money. She doesn't make enough money in the Bay Area to live in the Bay Area. That is really all this is about.
1 word = Greed 🐷🐷🐷
You're welcome to charge whatever you want for the apartment homes you own. This situation is not new. It's free market economics. Owners wouldn't be charging "a lot" if there wasn't anyone to pay it. I'm sorry I'm not sacrificing my resources and putting up all this risk to build an apartment building only to charge 1/4 of the going rate because some dumbass adults moved into an area that they couldn't afford and have some shit job as a secretary.
Shame on SF for letting teachers homeless in a city that is in need of educators.
you don't need a teacher in the elitist tech bro city, the frisco is nothing more than a playground for the elite, they don't produce kids
David Goans a tech bro, financial tycoon or young good looking woman since its a sausagefest and she will get tons of attention and treats from tech bros or tycoons. I don't see who else will enjoy frisco
Jorge Horna I agree with you. If SF just got rid of rent control and didn’t listen to nimbyism, then Sf would be more affordable. Of course, it is not this specific property owner’s responsibility to make sure a teacher is housed. I hope he gets his property back, as he is the victim here.
Benton Wesley yeah they shouldn’t pass immoral laws that disincentivize the construction of new housing. I agree with you.
Uhh wtf why report this and not do a follow up report. I wanna know if the nice teacher won 😟
Bryant Huezo hopefully she lost. The landlord is the victim here.
@@gregcarlson8438 how is the landlord the victim??
courtneymck the landlord is the victim of theft against his property due to the oppressive rent control law passed in that city by greedy tenants.
Z Ro I get that your greed can cause you to look at victims and attack them, so I take no insult.
Apparently it was settled out of court. Couldn't find any other information.
This is the insanity which is San Francisco.
$1700 for a tiny closet turned illegal unit. That is twice a monthly mortgage for a house in many parts of the country. Are they out of their minds in San Francisco?
Wait - so the landlord, who bought the illegal house knowing there was a tenant now doesn't want the tenant?
The house is not illegal. All over San Francisco there are additional units to the house called mother-in-law. They were add ons or apt in the backyard that people built back in the 60s. Supposedly so Mom could move in with you and have her own separate little place. People never got permits they just built them. Times have changed. Now people have more electronics. Multiple TVs, computers, etc. Many of these additional units do not meet building or electrical code. The new owners can actually be in trouble renting a illegal unit that is not up to building or electrical code.
The new owners are morons. Who the hell buys a property like that without first making sure that the old owners made arrangements for the tenant?
"They don't want to be landlords" gee, I wonder why....?
I bet they’re glad they got that shot of her drinking a glass of milk. Really tied the whole vid together.
😭
This is simply how they get renters out and allow housing to sky rocket. They did this decades ago in the Mission district, same idea.
TyrannyTerminator I hope they succeed and get to use their property the way they want to.
It’s a ploy on the part of the new owners; they can bring it up to code for a minimal amount of money based on the return they will get by renting out to new tenants for double or triple the rent being paid now by this teacher. Disgusting example of heartless greed.
please check back in and let us know how much the rent went up for the next renter
Why is this in my recommended after three years.
Cuz it’s still going on
Thank god my brother left California years ago.
Oh heck no... We need an update on this story. I hope she won her case.
Three days?
What a joke America has become.
Has been like this
I lived in sf and honestly most landlords are greedy, bad people who will turn you out the first chance they get
It's funny just how little perspective most adults have. They want to be capitalists when it benefits them, but socialists when it doesn't. The landlords are not your friend. They are running a business, not a fucking charity.
"The former owner left her behind".....WHAT????? Was the former landlord supposed to take the renter with him????
Becca Wildel hahaha right? Like damn have to make sure the new place has a basement sweet for the old lady who rents hahahaha
Do not live in an inlaw unit. They are very overpriced for the meager conditions they provide and you can get a real apartment for about the same. They often are not up to code and are fire traps. People just build them to pad their mortgages in this overinflated housing market.
She's not going to find anything comparable in her location for $1700 a month.
So, what was the outcome of this, seeing as how it was posted 3 years ago..?!
I would like to know the whole story and out come to.
I can't find a outcome at all.
@@MadMax-yq9ix
I can't either
@NorCal Rider thank you for answering
@NorCal Rider She probably already blew it all on McDonald's and Twinkies.
*And this is the land of freedom*
3 days to vacate is completely unreasonable- 60 would be a lot closer.
CRocketSlim until you wanted your property back . See if you’re still saying that bs ...
I’d let this go in the courts. Takes up to 6 months to legal kick out a person.
john doe which is exactly what the landlord is hoping to do. Just trying to get the tenant out.
How can any reasonable person demand someone move out in 3 days? That's ridiculous.
Seems the owner of the unit should be prosecuted for illegal rental. For nine years.
I've been living rent free in an RV in San Francisco for going on 8 years now.
Sure I've had the cops ask me to move, but I've never gotten a ticket, not even once.
A good job in SF + zero rent = a comfortable debt free life w/ adequate savings in the bank.
LoL 😁
Good job !!
RV Home ThAt sound soooo good. Half of America is seeing the RV life as the way to go.
Good for you brother ! Adapt or die !.. I considered living in an RV on the California coast myself, but I wised up and left for the southern nevada desert of Las Vegas, bought a brand new house for 100k ( back then ) now it's paid off, no debt WHATSOEVER ! ..... now the cash is piling up from the menial job that i love going to 4 days a week and that I've had for the past twenty years....the point is, live within your means and live where you can afford to
I've been dreaming for years to have my own RV to call home. I've been stuck living in my dad's kitchen in Long Beach for way too long. I have zero personal space or privacy. I can't even eat a meal without being in the way and needing to move for people while I'm still chewing. It's killing my soul and driving me insane and into deep depression. I can't ever seem to save any money though. I can't function like a normal person and get things done. I can't even answer phone calls. No privacy for anything. All I do is Uber, and I can barely even stand to do that anymore since I'm always in a bad mood and don't feel like dealing with people. I used to work at a warehouse (just making min wage) but had to quit since I couldn't even stay awake while doing my job. My bed is between the sink and the living room TV, and my dad and his spouse would blast the TV all night directly behind my damn pillow. I can't live or work like this. I'm just falling deeper into debt and depression by the day. I hate my life and I hate the world. I can't even have a life. Nobody understands or wants to help me.
People in the Bay area have been converting their garages into apartments for as long as I can remember.
When I lived in Daly City I knew about three houses on my block that had those as far back as the 70s-80s. And this was before stuff started getting mega expensive out there.
I can just imagine what it looks like now. I wonder if anybody does not have a garage converted into an apartment in my old neighborhood!
But she's renting.... so wouldn't it be the landlords problem? Plus you gotta give 30 days
Nug tg every state has their own rules regarding land ownership
Both previous and current owners were at fault here. Previous owner rented it out as illegal unit and the new owner bought it (presumably) knowing there were already tenants living in the illegal unit. But I agree more with the current landlord since the place is not supposed to support that much extra appliances/plumbing/kitchen/etc. The previous owner should be responsible to relocate the tenants.
Notekin lol maybe in make believe town. Honestly the only shady thing there doing is evicting her in 3 days.
Here in Canada you can give eviction notice to anyone for anything as long as you give them 90 days notice.
Yet the unit has been supporting those appliances etc for the past 9 years. Hmmm
The needed permits would be the cities fault. Landlord is just protecting their self.
Normally you get a notice to resolve the problem before eviction
All the landlord has to do is hire like day labor ( Labor Ready) to get the Mother In Law apartment up to code. This case doesn't need to be brought to court! Its a waste of legal time & money. Make a list, get it done, then document it to present to the people serving the eviction ( I forgot the name ). And I agree with Noel on here one million for that house? I've been around for a long time & that place was for working class people. It's the greedy real estate people. It's one reason I refuse to take real estate courses for a possible career. They're evil + greedy.
They said they don't want to rent it out anymore. The lawyer said the just don't want to be lamdlords
Are you suggesting that the tenant bring it up to code? Yeah... that will fly!
America: look at those Venezuelans fighting their government, they must have really let things go to hell!
Also America:
Kyle Bradley California
The $20,000 a year she pays in rent just about covers the property tax on a $1,300,000 house. ($20,000) Why are they kicking her out
Because they want to have loud sex and there is a child living with her
Instead of eviction, the new owners could simply have refused to renew the lease once it expired, and she'd have no defense. By telling her at the time of purchase the lease would not be renewed, she would have had plenty of time to find a new place.
@dandanthetaximan Which is yet again something else that discourages more homes. The harder the government tries to force the issue by interfering in the market (and California and San Francisco especially seems to think screwing the free marker is a sport), the fewer affordable houses are available - and just like the insane person who keeps doing the same thing expecting a different result, San Francisco will continue to repeat the same bad policies and be surprised at the poor results.
San Francisco will not allow anyone to build affordable housing, so that statement is a joke. That is why houses are way over priced. And one of many reasons to not live in San Francisco.
I once did some work for a recent arrival from SF. She asked me when someone was going to check her smoke detector. Apparently she meant a firefighter or some bureaucrats. Is that really a thing there? I explained to her that was her responsibility and to change the battery when she changed to daylight savings time. I was really astounded that she expected someone to hand hold her through such a thing.
As for the home in this story-the city planning department should require the new owners to completely gut the apartment and do it over again. I have seen that happen where I live over unpermitted additions in homes. I feel bad for the lady living in the apartment.
Landlords ARE legally responsible for replacing/keeping up smoke detectors! It's pretty much law nationwide.i hope your insurer hears about your negligence!!!
@@bs4real she owned the home, genius. I am not a landlord. I was an electrician doing work for her. Now, go wipe that egg off your face and stop making assumptions and knee jerk conclusions.
@@bs4real My apartment in New York City installed the smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector - required by city law -- but I am supposed to maintain the batteries from now on.
This insanity needs to stop!!!
If someone buys a house that you live in and they don’t want you to live there, you should leave. But, the law says you can stay. Well, in this case, the law also says that apartment isn’t permitted to be rented, so you have to go.
Anthony Tucciariello in three days?
40 out of 30000/40000 appts
are up to code... We're off to a great start
Gentrification.
Surely she has a lease? They could have just waited til the lease was up and not offered renewal. I wonder if their real estate agent was honest with them pertaining to taking full custody of the house. If they were told that they could quickly boot out the present tenant, the agent lied and that's an issue...but they carry responsibility for doing due diligence.
Landlord wants more rent. Hell, when I was paying for the home I had built I wan't paying even a fifth of that amount. We should secede from California, declare it a country, build a wall around it, and not let anyone visit without a passport.
You can't, dipshit.
I have a mortgage on a 1500sq.ft. home with 3 bedrooms and 2 full baths, 1 half bath. Car port on 1/4 acre. We payed $120,000 in 2007 w/ $700 payments. It's in a older subdivision, but it's quite. I don't ever want to have to sell. We'll never get that lucky again. My friends are paying $1500 - $2000 a month for mini-McMansions. Heck no! I'd rather travel.
Wayward Momma you are not in California
Sounds like an excellent plan to me and should go onto the 2020 ballot😁~I say this as someone who was born, raised, and reared my own 2 kiddos in S. Cali...
Now, my Daughter and Hubby are paying $3,500 monthly in Orange County since he grew-up near the ocean and wants to stay there to raise their own 4 Girlies💕💕:)
That's fine except for the fact that the entire state system is totally broken, with tragically millions of Homeless, horrible taxes, zero affordable housing, and schools so Liberal Parents are then having to pay for private education🤪🤯~
CRAZY CaliCrappyFreakornia, I say!!
The US economy would tank without California’s contributions. California alone is the 5th largest economy in the world.
If the home was sold then why did she not know about the sale. Yes it's a nasty way to push someone out of their home. But to only give her 3 days to move doesn't make since.
Cities are being sold to other countries so why bother to build walls when you can buy cities?
It's crazy that when the housing crisis of 2008 hit, people in the middle to upper middle classes told people with lower middle class incomes to just " get a better job". Here it is 15 years later and the housing market is now kicking THEM in the a*. This woman paid her rent for 9 years and clearly was a good tenant. The fact that someone like her facing homelessness exposes how unfair and greedy landlords can be.
I'm not sure how to solve the rental issue, but it IS an issue.
Three working professionals in Vancouver (similar housing crisis to SF) should not have to choose between paying 70% of their income for a safe place of their own, or share a knock-down house with no heat, a broken window, and at times water only coming from the tub. We were paying $2000 canadian for this and the landlords didnt care about the safety of the tenants. We were just occupiers until they bulldozed it.
Edit: It was just HALF the house. Another few tenants lived downstairs, paying a similar amount.
that’s at most an $80k home, for 1mil?? WHAT
Where have you been? The average price for a house in San Francisco is 1.3 million. And I mean average. Crazy huh?
They were probably ok with the tenant until they started getting the electric bill and water bill. A lot of people think they that they can be landlords but they don’t actually know the real cost of being a landlord.
She got a 3 day or quit not an eviction. Bring a unit that up to code will be thousands and thousands of dollars and make the unit uninhabitable during the rehab. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY...
You mean improvements. Permits are issued by the city to allow improvements and tax them. Code violations don’t normally equate with illegal. Moreover it’s not her property the owners might have any number of plans and tenants have no inherited right to stay beyond the lease
Anyone know how this turned out?
If the property is not legal as a rental unit, then the "landlord" broke the law by renting. He/she should return all the illegally acquired rent payments and be responsible for the tenant's housing until she finds a new place.
I wish there was an update. Hope her and her daughter are doing well.
I googled her name and apparently it was settled out of court, but no other information about her living situation
Countersue landlord for jeopardizing your life and safety by having apartments that aren't up to code. You're living in an apparent deathtrap according to the landlord.
The landlord is claiming to be a slumlord.
lol that is a first ^_-
Sort of, it’s a way to tell on themselves and avoid fines while collecting rent.
I know it’s bad, I tried to evict her, she won’t go so I have no choice but to let her live there and collect rent, so you can’t fine me cause I tried.
Not really they even said they purchased the house from the old landlord and now the new owner doesnt think its safe....aka they want the house to themselves
@@Wisconsin.pikachu very true when i buy houses i usually make sure there is no one in it , including squaters.
These people are going to wind up on sidewalks and in shelters. There is nowhere else to go. It is terrifying the power these landlords have to disrupt and uproot your life as if you are nothing more than a customer being kicked out of a restaurant. Moving costs thousands of dollars. It is no small thing to move.
Legal codes is a disguise to get rid of people in order to ramp up rent. This is BS but typical of people.
One Two the BS is the oppressive rent control law put in because of greedy tenants. I feel sorry for the landlords having to jump thru these expensive hoops to use the property the way they want to. I hope they win.
Greg Carlson it’s surprising you’d refer to people who are poor as greedy. She’s a fucking teacher who makes just enough to scrape by; she’s worried about becoming homeless! It’s not like she’s sitting on a pile of money and refusing to pay more in rent! The whole situation is just sad for each party involved
So she should sue the owners for illegally renting a illegal apartment.
What a horrible horrible city to Levin the working class of being driven out two or three or 4 hours commuting this is absolutely shocking I live in New Zealand I used to commute 20 minutes I'll be lucky if I passed the car on the road at 5:30 in the morning
I think it was the previous owner's responsibility to make sure the tenant would be taken care of before selling the property. And, since the previous owner charged her rent to live in an "illegal unit" for nine years, it's their obligation to give the tenant her rent payments back so she can either find a new place or stay somewhere else while the new owners bring the existing unit up to code.
Honestly, the new owners were fucking idiots for buying this property when a tenant was still living there in a guest house that wasn't up to code. Why the hell would anyone purchase a new property without making sure arrangements were made to take care of the tenant so a lawsuit like this wouldn't happen later on?
Also, I'm surprised there aren't laws regulating this kind of stuff (ie buying a property that has a tenant living there who intends to stick around after the old owner is gone). When my grandparents died, my father couldn't sell their house until their industrial grade appliances were removed because "you cannot sell a residential house with industrial grade appliances in California". But the old owners were allowed to sell their home despite the fact that their guest house had a tenant living there? WTF?
Landlords aren't the bad guys. They can charge whatever they want for their property. Own your own home and pay mortgage instead of rent. No one can make you leave then.
What part of illegal apartment do they not get? If they let her stay and she was injured they would be sued!
Shouldn't the last owner tell her that the house is being sold to another person. Whether its legal or not. You should at least give a few months notice.
As the homebuyers the permits should have been taken care of prior to closing on the house or they should given adequate notice as well as not accepted money on the uniit. They probably saw it as a good income potential and then it bit them in the ass. How did they even get a mortgage if the property was not up to code?
The landlord should have to pay..
Dont care about people who over pay for apts
gre p right here in Colorado either but there are expensive more in San Francisco they overpay for rent and they cannot even get respect
@@Wileyg4lify just came back from Colorado. Low pay and high rent... wow.
At least S.f. has high pay for some high rent for all..
gre p good to hear that
@@Wileyg4lify do you care? If somebody is willing to pay twice what something is worth? I dont. Ill go elsewhere...
Everyone is being evicted so sad
1:00 Which is EXACTLY why landlords are praying and trying to push this through!
Change the codes. Get rid of rent controls. Allow rent increases to keep up with market values. 1.3 million with a return of $1700 per month is a horrible return on investment. Only buy property when all tenants are out.
Shame on you Johnathan for taking this case. SHAME ON YOU
$1700. for a 2 bedroom in SF is basically free !!!!
Something is not adding up
This is 4 years old. Andy England 🇬🇧
andrew daley probably doubles now.
Ok so if she stays and something happens to the apartment because of safety codes then what happens I wonder.
1700 for that is very cheap
$1700 a month??? 😭
I don't know where you live but $1,700 a month is a bargain for a two-bedroom in San Francisco. Don't believe me? Go to Zillow and search two-bedroom apartments in San Francisco just for fun.
@@adc2327 I just did and wowwwwwww it's actually disgusting!
It's scary to me how many people have this entitled attitude towards renting. You don't own it and the owner(s) have every right legally and morally to do whatever they want with *their* property!
What an awful city to live in
It's yours to do what you want to after you buy the house.... So the landlord want her out...maybe she should buy her own house.... Then she doesnt have to depend on somebody else..
Exactly what i was thinking money talks
I'm sure she had a hell of a lot more notice than 2 days. Secondly, I'm sure she was offered one month money after the move out date. She doesn't want to move even though it is not her apartment. She doesn't own it! Wtf is the problem here?
Not a kindergarten teacher cmon now!! How cruel
Efrain De Zúñiga Feel free to give her housing at your place.
It's funny how the lawyer shifts blame.
Welp, plug up the pressure release valve on the water heater on the way out.
Hahahhahahahaha that's brilliant!
Lol!
I guess she expected her rent to increase like everybody else's. Didn't expect when the unit was sold the law would step in for it's cut of the sale and more revenue? She should be happy it wasn't raised in the years proceeding or that she wasn't charged after it was found out she was illegally leaving taxed free. What? Didn't hear about the Ghost Ship warehouse fire where 35 died that was caused by essentially exactly what she was doing -- living in a non-reviewed, non-approved hidden apartment?
Very true and i bet more fires to come. I was playing a show in oakland when that shit was going down.
Why people keep buying mortgages for some one else to own.183,000 over 9 years payed off the apartment and now they are kicking her out I am lost for words
Such corruption; honest, hardworking people don't stand a chance!