Great work.I have a 8 inch Dobsonian myself, seeing the shadow of a moon on Jupiter as well as a minor planet and the rings of Saturn as well as all the lunar features is awesome. Keep looking up,clear skies and love and respect for all.
@@samarthkumble8385 A Newtonian is a telescope that using mirrors to gather and reflect light , a Dobsonian refers to the type of mount that is used. I may be wrong but I think most or all Dobsonian (the type of mount) are Newtonian but not all Newtonian are on a Dobsonian mount. I hope this helps.
😍♥️ الحمد لله والشكر لله خالق الكون لا اله الا هو رب كل شيء ♥️😍 - سيدنا محمد عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️ -سيدنا عيسى عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️ -سيدنا موسى عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️ -سيدنا ابراهيم عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️ وجميع الانبياء والرسل صلى الله عليهم وسلم كل شيء خلقه الله سبحانه هو رب كل شيء وبيده كل شيء ♥️😍 فنحن نعبد اله واحد سبحانه وتعالى ♥️😍
I took video with GoPro hero 7 black ( tried some settings (i usually set 2.7K 60fps , wih max digital zoom but that can reduce detail (digital zoom makes pixels larger from what i know ) , in this video first image of Jupiter was in 4k 60fps ) you need to set iso 200 or 400 also reduce shutter (has to be low because high brightness not too low but also not too high ) ), then use pipp to get frames out and use autostakert to stack photos or gif animation , and in the end use registax 6 to get more detail out . In this video is best image of Saturn i ever managed to get while for Jupiter later I managed to get better ones.
@@skypowergb3842 sorry to bother you again. Did you remove the original gopro lens for these shots? I experimented last night with this and could not get anything to come into focus.
With eye the doo look smaller but yes and even better with better camera , in this video jupiter is really bad looking cause this was first time for me using software for stacking (pipp , autostakert and registax ) i also use digital zoom on gopro mybe i shouldnt do that cause it inreases size of pixels but wen i was recording this video i did same with 4k without zoom and there wasnt much difference
That's good to know. I just got mine a few days ago and used it to view Jupiter last night for the first time. I was quite disappointed that what I saw was not much different that what I saw in my old cheapo refractor scope. It was basically a brighter but slightly larger white dot within a larger field of view in the eye piece (so it stayed in view longer). I was using a 25mm Plossl with no Barlow and no filters of any kind on the Celestron Starsense 8 inch Dobsonian. Looks like I just need a more powerful eyepiece and a Barlow. I will say that things were much clearer than with my refractor and the sky was full of stars when I was scanning (much more than were easily visible with the naked eye).
@@ManahManah77 now today i use 6mm planetary without barlow , but dobsonian is best for dso not planets , refractor is sharper and has more contrast but when you turn dobsonian to something like m57(ring nebula ) or m13(hercules cluster ) thats when you see difference, but this depends on diameter larger diameter is usually better , larger f number should give more sharpness but reduces brightness
@@skypowergb3842 Thank you. I've been reading and watching some videos and it looks like I just need a more powerful eyepiece than the 25mm (the 6mm you mention was very popular)1 and a filter or two to see any definition on the two gas giants. Does that sound correct? I'm also assuming that the filters can help with dsos as well.
@@dimensio_italian_magician There must be physical separation between the vacuum and the air, otherwise all the air will be sucked out! Stop your space fantasies. Space doesn't exist.
Great work.I have a 8 inch Dobsonian myself, seeing the shadow of a moon on Jupiter as well as a minor planet and the rings of Saturn as well as all the lunar features is awesome. Keep looking up,clear skies and love and respect for all.
I agree, great work indeed!
What's better, Newtonian or dobsonian telescope?
@@samarthkumble8385 A Newtonian is a telescope that using mirrors to gather and reflect light , a Dobsonian refers to the type of mount that is used. I may be wrong but I think most or all Dobsonian (the type of mount) are Newtonian but not all Newtonian are on a Dobsonian mount. I hope this helps.
Always wanted to look at Saturn and Jupiter trough a telescope 🔭 for myself it looks like it would be amazing
😍♥️ الحمد لله والشكر لله خالق الكون لا اله الا هو رب كل شيء ♥️😍
- سيدنا محمد عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️
-سيدنا عيسى عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️
-سيدنا موسى عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️
-سيدنا ابراهيم عليه الصلاة والسلام نبي الله ♥️
وجميع الانبياء والرسل صلى الله عليهم وسلم كل شيء خلقه الله سبحانه هو رب كل شيء وبيده كل شيء ♥️😍 فنحن نعبد اله واحد سبحانه وتعالى ♥️😍
Looks great
Excellent resolution
Amazing. what is the focal length of this telescope?
1200
@@skypowergb3842 with a 2x Barlow wouldnt it be 2400?
@@bumrush5735 with 2x barlow yes then its like 2400
Does a Barlow make the visibility poorer or can that be because of a cheap quality Barlow?
@@liamdullaghan7645 since the telescope is deeigned for 1200 yes it makes it poorer and if yoj have 5x 7x much harder to focus
👑💯🏠
How do you mount the Gopro ?
Greetings
I used 3d printed mount that i designed myself but its not the best
@@skypowergb3842 Thanks and Greetings
How did you get the stills of the planets? They look amazing. I have the same telescope and would love to try to replicate it
I took video with GoPro hero 7 black ( tried some settings (i usually set 2.7K 60fps , wih max digital zoom but that can reduce detail (digital zoom makes pixels larger from what i know ) , in this video first image of Jupiter was in 4k 60fps ) you need to set iso 200 or 400 also reduce shutter (has to be low because high brightness not too low but also not too high ) ), then use pipp to get frames out and use autostakert to stack photos or gif animation , and in the end use registax 6 to get more detail out . In this video is best image of Saturn i ever managed to get while for Jupiter later I managed to get better ones.
Thanks for the info! I assume you used the 10mm eyepiece and the gopro dorect attached to that? Did you have a barow at all?
@@Tjm5806 yes i used 10mm eyepiece with 2x barlow and gopro attached on that
@@skypowergb3842 Awesome! Thanks for the info. Your pictures are incredible!
@@skypowergb3842 sorry to bother you again. Did you remove the original gopro lens for these shots? I experimented last night with this and could not get anything to come into focus.
can i have images like this on a skywatcher 203 dobsian?
With eye the doo look smaller but yes and even better with better camera , in this video jupiter is really bad looking cause this was first time for me using software for stacking (pipp , autostakert and registax ) i also use digital zoom on gopro mybe i shouldnt do that cause it inreases size of pixels but wen i was recording this video i did same with 4k without zoom and there wasnt much difference
Saturn and Jupiter are the 2 easiest planets to find and observe with a telescope on the night sky!
but on others there isnt much to see anyway except Mars , Venus and Mercury
Hey, what brand eyepiece and barlow did you use?
i dont know for barlow x2 (on site says 1,25" achromatic with T2 ) 10mm eyepiece is from aliexpress svbony for larger fov
hey ! this is a great job ! can you tell me the eyepiece used in the video please
Skywatcher super plossl 10mm , and 2x barlow
@@skypowergb3842 thank you !
That's good to know. I just got mine a few days ago and used it to view Jupiter last night for the first time. I was quite disappointed that what I saw was not much different that what I saw in my old cheapo refractor scope. It was basically a brighter but slightly larger white dot within a larger field of view in the eye piece (so it stayed in view longer). I was using a 25mm Plossl with no Barlow and no filters of any kind on the Celestron Starsense 8 inch Dobsonian. Looks like I just need a more powerful eyepiece and a Barlow. I will say that things were much clearer than with my refractor and the sky was full of stars when I was scanning (much more than were easily visible with the naked eye).
@@ManahManah77 now today i use 6mm planetary without barlow , but dobsonian is best for dso not planets , refractor is sharper and has more contrast but when you turn dobsonian to something like m57(ring nebula ) or m13(hercules cluster ) thats when you see difference, but this depends on diameter larger diameter is usually better , larger f number should give more sharpness but reduces brightness
@@skypowergb3842 Thank you. I've been reading and watching some videos and it looks like I just need a more powerful eyepiece than the 25mm (the 6mm you mention was very popular)1 and a filter or two to see any definition on the two gas giants. Does that sound correct? I'm also assuming that the filters can help with dsos as well.
Is this the Pyrex version or the classic?
You mean colllapsiable or classic. its classic
@@skypowergb3842 ty
What eyepiece did you use?
sky watcher super plossl 10mm and 25mm + 2x barlow with gopro on top of them using 3d printed adapter .
🌕🏬🌐🏬🌕🌐🕴️🏬🌕🕴️🌐🏬🌕🕴️🌐🏬🌕🏬🌕🌐🌑⚫💥🌐💥🌐🏬💥⚫🏬💥🌐🏬🌕🕴️🏬🌕🕴️🏬🌕🕴️🌐🏬🌐🕴️🏬🕴️🌐🏬💥🌕🕴️🏬🌞🏬
Why doesn't NASA tell people these are real photos? Instead of those phony CGI balls
Shut up, flathead. They are not fake.
@@dimensio_italian_magician There must be physical separation between the vacuum and the air, otherwise all the air will be sucked out! Stop your space fantasies. Space doesn't exist.
@@RANGLUYI dumbass, vacuum of space isn't a vacuum cleaner
@@RANGLUYI your brain is fake
Flat brain 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fake.
Evidence? No? Stfu.
Wdym
Always a conspiracy prick about.