Nothing about reproduction if perfect tho there’s so many problems with it. As long as a species can produce one or more offspring then evolution has done its job no perfection required just a passable means to an end
Evolution doesn't "strive" for anything; it has no direction! It is a description of what is observed, like gravity. If it strove for passable, extinction would not occur. It cannot judge what is and isn't "fittest." It's just that, in retrospect, we claim that, on average, the "fittest" members are more likely to reproduce. But that is impossible to verify and not necessarily true in the short run. Evolution is a drunk college student passed out on the bar.
In a classroom in an alternate universe where humans have electroreceptive abilities: *A bored student pulls out phone* Teacher: DO I SENSE A PHONE HERE!?
*sorry, point #2 is simply WRONG. we **_humans_** still do have electroreception - or **_how_** do you **_explain_** that ppl feel a weird electrical pressure in their brain, comparable to a sour muscle, if they're surrounded by strong electrosmog for a long period of long intervalls with short breaks???*
@@Dichtsau They really don't feel jack squat. We've tested this exhaustively. It would be cool if it was true but it just isn't. What they describe is a placebo effect, when they feel something just because they believe in it.
Yeah it would be great to keep that ability. Even if it was a bit weak at sensing. We could figure out how to advance the ability or nullify it. I just can’t imagine the types of entertainment and technology could be possible if we did.
@@matthewuchiha8501 Do you also shade print journalists because the do fancy stuff with the words and don't write like the common people speak? He's a presenter, he presents a scripted "story". It's not gonna sound and look like your bros telling you a story.
Rob Slevin That’s because hunter-gatherer humans depended on over a hundred different plant species for food everyday, so there was no risk of vitamin c deficiency. That is until we started depending on only a dozen plant species for most of our food.
@@elijahmikhail4566 yeah but if somebody was to gene edit the ability to produce vitamin C back into our genome again it would probably be natural selective pressure to keep it if not we could sexual select for it to ensure our kids don't get scurvy because we're sentient and intelligent and want to have healthy offspring that won't get sick
@@elijahmikhail4566 It actually goes back even farther into other primates as well. So you're right about the why but it wasn't just early humans. Basically all primates screwed up by eating so much fruit, lol.
Nickolas Jeffrey That’s true, but for now, modifying babies is unethical in the field of genetics. Also, you would have to use patients where there is a common problem of vitamin c deficiency like poor regions of developing countries or food desserts in wealthier ones. Even then, it would take thousands of years before selective pressure can drive that activated gene into the majority of humanity.
Do an episode on parallel evolution. One of the most interesting things I learned in biological evolution was how almost the same complex structures are independently evolved in completely different lineages, like octopus eyes and vertebrate eyes. This likely means that aliens won't necessarily be all that different from life here.
Garrett Shmerett this means that aliens MIGHT not be that different. But considering there are probably as many planets in the universe with life, as there are species on this planet, I’m sure it’s possible
One of the things I think is really fascinating about octopus and vertebrate eyes is the structural difference between their retinas. In vertebrates, the nerves and blood vessels supplying the retina are on the surface, and the point where they converge and pass through the retina results in a blind spot, known as the punctum caecum. In octopuses the nerves and blood vessels are behind the retina - a clearly superior design since it means they have no blind spot.
Aliens might not be so different if they come from a planet very similar to ours. The environment of their native planet will be the driving force of their evolution. Very high gravity might mean all their life stays fairly small and stout compared to Earth life.
Yes, parallel evolution is a really cool topic. Flight was developed at least four times in Earth's history; insects, pterodactyls, birds, and bats, and each group (aside insects) functions really alike. Bipedalism is a lot more common, with us as the possibly best example, but being developed by lots of other creatures, like pangolins, giant sloths, and about half the dinosaur species. Live birth is a weird one, as it developed both in mammals as in some sharks. It's weird because sharks are possibly the most distant to us genetically. And as far as I know, both mammals and birds developed warm blood separatedly, which is impressive since it's the trait that allowed both groups to take over zones too cold to other terrestrial animals.
Why not? Mantids have five eyes, and most spiders have eight. And look at the mantis shrimp. While it technically only has two eyes, each one of its eyes are subdivided into three smaller sections, each of which can independently look in its own direction. It's not that difficult to imagine different types of vertebrate could have a different number of eyes, as well.
We have the technology to replicate it. It's a tiny magnet that is inserted into your fingertip with a needle and it'll allow you to feel electric fields again.
@@ginnyjollykidd . *Gill Dimensions as a Function of Fish Size* www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/f69-018?journalCode=jfrbc#.XW3S5ygzaUk *a brief summary of the above study* jeb.biologists.org/content/45/1/177
We also have a broken genetic sequence to make Vitamin C. Almost every mammal can make Vitamin C. Presumably our ancestors took up a diet that included the vitamin so the ability wasn't needed. Interestingly, Chimps and Gorillas have the exact same mutation that prevents them from finishing the Vitamin C synthesis proving we have a "recent" common ancestor and that we are more closely related to Chimps and Gorillas than other primates. A similar destructive mutation affects our ability to process uric acid (causes gout) but only Chimps and Humans have this mutation so we're more closely related to Chimps than Gorillas.
@@starwarfan8342 The chances of it being convergent evolution is virtually zero because the genetic mutation is in the exact same place in our DNA. I attended a lecture at Auckland University a few years ago where the lecturer was Graeme Finlay, a microbiologist (and strangely, a Christian) who used the Vitamin C example as 100% proof of our common ancestry with Gorillas and Chimpanzees (and Bonobos of course).
Philip J Fry Just because we eat differently does not mean that we are not related at all. That’s like pointing out that small species of dogs did not originate from wolves at one point just because they are barely similar anymore. That’s wasn’t natural by any means, it was their domestication by humans that changed their behavior and traits. Humans decided they wanted an animal to help them, so they bred the most domestic wolves together until they could not be classified as true wolves anymore. Then humans decided they wanted their dogs to serve specific purposes (e.g. hunting for big game or rats) each has a different set of requirements to be good at their “job.” Natural selection does what humans have done to dogs, just at a much slower scale. Hence why we don’t need to eat our own poop for digestive flora, however “poop transplants” exist to help repopulated the digestive system after a person somehow had all their digestive flora killed
@@Dnite13 its unnecessary to always have it on but I'm glad it works for you. The scientific literature behind blue light and blue light filters is still far from being conclusive but most scientists would agree that you should limit blue light within a couple hours of bed to be on the safe side.
As it does many people, mostly men, as it is a dominant trait in men and a recessive trait in women. But be glad! That means that women like men whose traits make men lose their hair, so it is a phenotype -- a visible expression -- of a survival trait! In fact, bald heads are attractive to women. To wit the women who fell in love with Yul Brenner and Telly Savalas. I knew a man who shaved his head of any wisps of hair on his head, and he sported a very handsome head that had a prominent peak on top. Mohandas Ghandi was bald. A RUclipsr Simon Whistler (Today I Found Out) has a bald head (partly by shaving) and he himself has a following. Alas! It isn't popular among women to have bald heads. Some tribes in Africa have bald-headed women who are beautiful with them. I, on the other hand, lost mine to cancer treatment (I got it back) and I felt devastated without it. I felt naked and a bit ashamed. One morning when I was still half-asleep, I was being tickled on the ear as happened with my previous hair, and I groused about it. Then I sat up, surprised. "I have hair!" I shouted. I was overjoyed! It was much thinner than before, but it was hair! For a long while I kept it because I didn't trust that it would keep a hairstyle like I had before -- two years after my treatment , to the month -- and I got my hair cut to the short cut I had before, even allowing a bit to be fine-clipped closely to my head. And I am delighted with it! Enjoy what you have and show it off to your favorite people!
Amateur0Visionary I find the comments in good humor and in good fun. I think it’s strange people get upset about an innocuous meme. If you don’t like it why don’t you just keep scrolling? No harm done:
Also, it's not useful in species that are primarily the predators. Our eyes migrated towards the front for similar reasons to why we lost that extra eye. If something is going to eat us, it's probably going to be large enough and fast enough that seeing it isn't going to make much of a difference. Chances are it's going to be large, fast and come from behind where the 3rd eye wouldn't have helped anyways as it was pointed towards the front.
Excellent video, but I just wish you had also mentioned photolyases. They are a MAJOR loss shared by all placental mammals - the very reason we get sun burns and skin cancer. Maybe a future episode on that?
@@planetzodd4849 just turn up. They are twiching as the date gets nearer. They even got Tool to release their album, might even release HL3, but we naruto run into the base and free ET.
You said " in fact, we might still be in the process of losing our Jacobson gene" I like thinking about what we are possibly transitioning from and to. It gives me a sense of novelty. Maybe consider doing a whole episode about other things we could explain by being the very process of that transition ourselves?
Even if vitamin C synthesis isn't inn the video, ight is inn most fresh produce and most any animal. Eat your greens and get calcium, iron, and vitamin C.
@@rogaineablar5608 You are an S-Level troll, distracting from your trolling with a confusing message trying to invalidate a completely valid point and making an assumption sound like an obvious truth. Well done!
Don't worry about AIDS. First, you can only catch it by sex or contact with blood by being poked with a contaminated sharp. The odds of catching it from a contaminated sharp (needle or broken glass) is 2 in 1 million. That is 0.0002% whereas catching hepatitis in that way is 1 in 30 or approximately 3.33%. Nowadays, HIV has evolved into a much milder version such that contracting it no longer causes death. We still don't have a vaccine for it, which I think was part of the reason. It's a very harsh way of evolving parasitism, for parasite and host alike. HIV was most virulent in the 1980's when it came to the US. Those who got it died within a few years or sooner, as many were immune-suppressed and were ravaged with opportunistic cancers and invaders like cryptosporidium which most people are immune to. The movie _Philadelphia_ is worth watching to see what happened in the 1980's outbreak. On the other side, because humans were becoming more aware and as a community were practicing safe sex, HIV didn't get much of a chance to spread. It killed many people, but it wasn't like the European Black Plague in the 1300's and 1400's which killed off 2/3rds of Europe's population. So HIV was relatively isolated. Those it infected it killed. This is its downfall because it didn't get a virus' normal way of reproducing after it made lots of copies of itself. HIV died with its hosts. Those of us who survived the 1980's lived to reproduce, which is the way of evolution. But, as happens in many evolutionary cases, AIDS or HIV survived. The HIV that survived had a mutation from its 1980's proliferation such that it did NOT kill its host. A parasite that does not kill its host is the most successful parasite. This is why Herpes zoster--chicken pox--is successful: it lives in a sleep state in a facial nerve--the trigeminofacial nerve--without causing us, its host, to fall ill. That is, until its environment is less stable to the virus, and it breaks out as shingles in older folk. This milder form of HIV that was selected for no longer is the death sentence of the 1980's. But practicing safe sex in any sexual encounter is still the best way to avoid contracting it even as safe sex is the best way to avoid chlamydia, herpes, candidiasis, gonorrhea, syphilis, and most other STI's.
You don't have to worry about AIDS as long as you practice safe sex. If you were cut by a sharp contaminated with blood from a person who was HIV positive, it would be 2 inn a million chance tho catch AIDS. It is almost impossible to culture HIV. (A special agar must be used.) I would be more concerned with getting my immunizations before traveling overseas.
@@ginnyjollykidd I would really like to see some evidence in the form of papers confirming that this is the case and a less lethal strain is in fact around
- " yeah the circuit breaker is "open", totally safe to work on that pannel" -"Are you dumb! I can feel the electric field from here, you opened the wrong one "
I remember hearing of people doing body modification where they implanted magnets close to nerves in their hands and supposedly they can feel electrical current.
I haven't finished the video yet, but I just wanted to say thank you for calming down your presentation a bit! I used to watch SciShow but took a break because most of the time they are just too high energy and the presenter talks so fast. I can keep up, it just doesn't allot me any time to process and form my own thoughts in between things. This is much more calm and just slowed down enough to not make me feel like I'm on a rollercoaster, but still has energy and feeling with the presentation! Keep up the great work! And thanks again! :)
I'm pretty sure I have electroreception. When I plug things into an outlet and accidentally touch the prongs my body will sense a great deal of electricity.
Yeah... When are going to be able to drink saltwater? Why are we on a planet that's mostly undrinkable water? Come on Evolution, you're screw'n us over here!
@@kho5254 With our limited freshwater supply dwindling, we better speed this train up! Haven't you ever been thirsty at the beach and looked at all that water and wondered, why nature, why? Not that anyone should drink unpurified water even if we could drink saltwater.
@@kho5254 I absolutely agree! I went to college studying economics of transitioning to more sustainable technology and customs and always was excited about the development desalination plants. Sadly the technology is not quite where we want it yet and there are not enough of them at this point in time.
0:19 basically wrong. It's not surviving UNTIL you reproduce. It's quiet obvious, having a strong, experienced, grown up father to protect you may increase your survivability as an infant. So for the parent it's not only surviving until reproduce, because being alive after the offspring is born is quiet beneficial for the offspring.
Great video. I think it really just reminds us that humans are all different, and when some people claim to have weird abilities, there's a possibility some old abilities have just come back around! You never know...mutants, where y'all at??
Give it time, we'll develop extra joints in our thumbs or extra thumbs for phone typing (the individuals in the species who can operate two tinder accounts simultaneously are more likely to pass their genes to the next generation).
If thumb skill becomes a trait that is sexually attractive (that could be through other methods too)........some people might advance a more dexterous thumb, into the human genome, in time it might affect the group.
We do. It's the pineal gland, which is well-protected under the skull. You can find its position by putting the tip of your tongue as far back as you can and touching your soft pallet. The pineal gland is located right above the soft pallet.
But we did get a superpower we got the ultimate superpower that's why we, temporarily, rule the planet. We didn't need extra sensors and more organs we developed a big brain. Why would u need to sense pheromones anymore when u can pick up visual and audio clues just as quickly but now we have the ability to reason and problem solve therefore those systems are unnecessary and therefore obsolete. Not an expert. Just my opinion. Thanks Scishow
@@GooseAtron5000 We're the only apes with buttocks, they're for jogging - running down things that are bigger than us over long distances in packs, exhausting them and then using tools to kill them. We sweat, and are virtually hairless for cooling, perfect for a stamina predator. Many predators attack in bursts of energy without much sustain on open ground, but we're a bit more like wolves than cheetahs. We're also very adaptable and flexible to terrain compared to other highly specialised hunters. Our other superpower is cooking, it's a form of predigestion that allows the skull to accommodate less chewing power and more brain. Humans use imagination to communicate. We're always building narratives to explain and share everything.
TL;DR this video develops 2 misconceptions. I want you to consider 2 points below, having in mind traits cost, sometimes heavy cost. 1) While relaxed selection is a thing (0:25), evolution selects negatively BECAUSE the cost is, in some way, detrimental (0:32). Somehow the video touches the point, but disregard it for the rest of the arguments presented. Sad thing. 2) Loosing a trait forces the development of a better adaptation, so we loose it not because it lost value (1:49 and 3:30), but because it favored a better way to cope with the same old necessity (4:08) with further benefits. The change was also costly, but payed off. Detailed. Any trait, any gene or physiological interaction has a cost, undergoing negative and positive selection pressure AT THE SAME TIME. This is an axiom for biological systems, a philosophy if you like. Utterly underestimated in the video. 1) We don't loose traits because they have low or no value. See, traits (phenotype, and its genotype distribution) always have a cost. Some have a high cost in physiology, ecology, etc. A pin-point example: Bacteria have plasmids, small circular DNA chains separated from the big genome that encode for antibiotic resistance. They add this heavy cost in extra DNA (negative pressure) produced because it has value (positive pressure). But once the environment doesn't have antibiotics anymore, random bacteria that lost this plasmid reproduce faster (positive pressure without negative pressure), less time time consumed in DNA replication, less resources needed. Thus natural selection favored the loss of trait, no more antibiotic resistance in the population, cost less for living and reproducing. Relaxed selection doesn't affect phenotype frequency in a population, so it has no impact on natural selection. Explanation: a mutation, called recessive gene (mutated gene), occurs in a single individual and has a 50% chance to disappear in the next generation. Even if an entire family has the mutation, further reproduction will loose it because the dominant gene exists in such overwhelming numbers. Google for Genetic Drift why we have recessive genes in high relative number (high frequency). Mutation mechanisms that affect more then one individual do impact, like a DNA virus that, in a contagion process, inserts itself in the host genome causing it to change somehow. 2) Trait replacement like in 4:08 is tricky: We need, at some point, to have both traits, so that one strengthen (because of net positive pressure) while the other recedes (because of net negative pressure). But they are both complex systems being selected. A system has a core trait or traits, but have marginal traits that connect to other systems, which also undergo a parallel, maybe less selective process. But IT IS NOT a strong trait replacing the older, but rather been strengthened by the negative selection of the older. If the conditions for positive and negative selection continues, regarding costs and value, the systems enter a feedback loop. As we can see, the topic is very complex. Consider the process that formed the appendix, a diminished organ functionality was costly, so this entire region of the intestines diminished also, as a core residual trait (immunology) justified its existence, but in a very small tissue with less maintenance needed.
I'm also curious about the people who maybe still have these traits in some way. A gene mutation or reactivated genetic trait that we once had. Such as the sweat of some men smell sweet to some women, like pheromones. or some people's sensitivity to electric fields or anything electronic that they have to move to an isolated town without any tech to avoid suffering headaches.
I am highly scent focused around partners and close friends. I remember their scent so much, it's almost like I feel it in my nose. It could just be a sense of smell though and nothing to do with pheromones.
2:09 If I'm not mistaken, as long as archosaurs dominated the world, mammals or their ancestors were mostly burrowers, and possibly nocturnal. That goes hand in hand with becomming warm blooded, but it makes even more sense to lose a sensor for daylight when you're seldom even exposed to it, so, worth mentioning too. :)
But, unlike the Y-chromosome, the female X-chromosomes can all be passed on to a male child. Where would the genes that only gave arms to females hide?
I know it is a joke, but how many arms is a mother supposed to have. a) Is it just funny if one has fewer than 2 b) Is it a joke about women being better at multitasking while having multiple arms.
One thing that is always brought up is strength. Among the apes we are lacking, our wrists can do something most of the other apes cannot. That movement advantage/strength disadvantage allows us to thrust with pointy objects. (I could be wrong on this)
@@somairasa3732 you are such a deluded guy. If shiva is doing for good then he Doesn't need to kill all he just need to kill those who are mentally evil. That's why shiva is not worthy of worshiping because he don't care whether good of bad he will kill you all.
we still have the third eye, it's there on an energetic level as the third eye chakra which resides within the pineal gland. there's piezoelectric crystals in there which give off DMT which is responsible for dreams and seeing life flash before one's eyes before death
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Good point, evolution does not always mean becoming stronger, faster etc.
You Darwin some, you Darlose some.
beautiful 😭
You need to start slowly, for such a long stretch.
I like the pun, but I don’t feel like I am losing out on any abilities.
Thanks I hate it
This amused and disgusted me at the same time.
evolution doest strive for perfection. it strives for just about passable. from this, we can conclude, evolution is a college student.
Nothing about reproduction if perfect tho there’s so many problems with it. As long as a species can produce one or more offspring then evolution has done its job no perfection required just a passable means to an end
@@shaonian
"Strives for reproductive success"
So, still a college student.
Evolution doesn't "strive" for anything; it has no direction!
It is a description of what is observed, like gravity. If it strove for passable, extinction would not occur.
It cannot judge what is and isn't "fittest." It's just that, in retrospect, we claim that, on average, the "fittest" members are more likely to reproduce. But that is impossible to verify and not necessarily true in the short run.
Evolution is a drunk college student passed out on the bar.
Evolution disagrees and is watching you. Clean your room and starch your socks.
Survival of the goldilocks
In a classroom in an alternate universe where humans have electroreceptive abilities:
*A bored student pulls out phone*
Teacher: DO I SENSE A PHONE HERE!?
*sorry, point #2 is simply WRONG. we **_humans_** still do have electroreception - or **_how_** do you **_explain_** that ppl feel a weird electrical pressure in their brain, comparable to a sour muscle, if they're surrounded by strong electrosmog for a long period of long intervalls with short breaks???*
@@Dichtsau
That might actually get to produce physical changes in our brain/other senses.
@@Dichtsau static electricity != electroreception
@@Dichtsau They really don't feel jack squat. We've tested this exhaustively. It would be cool if it was true but it just isn't. What they describe is a placebo effect, when they feel something just because they believe in it.
Yeah it would be great to keep that ability. Even if it was a bit weak at sensing. We could figure out how to advance the ability or nullify it. I just can’t imagine the types of entertainment and technology could be possible if we did.
Props to the guy explaining, so nice, chill, friendly and entertaining
Lol, bro hes just acting if you pay attention. They all act the same way.
You should come around more often. its a great channel with more nice people
@@matthewuchiha8501 Do you also shade print journalists because the do fancy stuff with the words and don't write like the common people speak? He's a presenter, he presents a scripted "story". It's not gonna sound and look like your bros telling you a story.
@@matthewuchiha8501 If you watch SciShow QuizShow, he's still nice, friendly and chill. No acting required. Weirdo lmao
THEN WHY DON'T YOU JUST GO AND MARRY HIM THEN
We also lost the ability to make our own vitamin C, forcing us to become orange and lemon farmers!
Rob Slevin That’s because hunter-gatherer humans depended on over a hundred different plant species for food everyday, so there was no risk of vitamin c deficiency. That is until we started depending on only a dozen plant species for most of our food.
@@elijahmikhail4566 yeah but if somebody was to gene edit the ability to produce vitamin C back into our genome again it would probably be natural selective pressure to keep it if not we could sexual select for it to ensure our kids don't get scurvy because we're sentient and intelligent and want to have healthy offspring that won't get sick
@@elijahmikhail4566 It actually goes back even farther into other primates as well. So you're right about the why but it wasn't just early humans. Basically all primates screwed up by eating so much fruit, lol.
Nickolas Jeffrey That’s true, but for now, modifying babies is unethical in the field of genetics. Also, you would have to use patients where there is a common problem of vitamin c deficiency like poor regions of developing countries or food desserts in wealthier ones. Even then, it would take thousands of years before selective pressure can drive that activated gene into the majority of humanity.
Fun fact: pine needles contain several times more vitamin C than oranges. Getting that scurvy? Have some pine needle tea!
I still want my tail back
Same
stop 🛑
furries are prohibited here
🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫🚫
No furries within 800,000 lightyears of earth
@IoTheKingOfGames
Me too, M8, me too.
But then you will become a giant ape if you look into the moon.
We paid a high price for bipedalism with back pain, hip trouble etc as well. Guess looking across the savannah was worth it, maybe.
I think that's over inflated. Traditionally humans have been much more active than nowadays and back/hip pain was rare
And the real advantage is energy efficiency and ability to use hands
We also weren't designed to last this long so that's a big reason why
True. Don't forget the lovely foot and knee problems as well.
And over supportive shoes exacerbate the problem. Especially shoes with a high heel to toe drop.
Do an episode on parallel evolution. One of the most interesting things I learned in biological evolution was how almost the same complex structures are independently evolved in completely different lineages, like octopus eyes and vertebrate eyes. This likely means that aliens won't necessarily be all that different from life here.
Garrett Shmerett this means that aliens MIGHT not be that different. But considering there are probably as many planets in the universe with life, as there are species on this planet, I’m sure it’s possible
One of the things I think is really fascinating about octopus and vertebrate eyes is the structural difference between their retinas. In vertebrates, the nerves and blood vessels supplying the retina are on the surface, and the point where they converge and pass through the retina results in a blind spot, known as the punctum caecum. In octopuses the nerves and blood vessels are behind the retina - a clearly superior design since it means they have no blind spot.
Aliens might not be so different if they come from a planet very similar to ours. The environment of their native planet will be the driving force of their evolution. Very high gravity might mean all their life stays fairly small and stout compared to Earth life.
Yes, parallel evolution is a really cool topic.
Flight was developed at least four times in Earth's history; insects, pterodactyls, birds, and bats, and each group (aside insects) functions really alike.
Bipedalism is a lot more common, with us as the possibly best example, but being developed by lots of other creatures, like pangolins, giant sloths, and about half the dinosaur species.
Live birth is a weird one, as it developed both in mammals as in some sharks. It's weird because sharks are possibly the most distant to us genetically.
And as far as I know, both mammals and birds developed warm blood separatedly, which is impressive since it's the trait that allowed both groups to take over zones too cold to other terrestrial animals.
Look up opabinia and see how little that actually means.
Never thought I would see the day the "third eye" had real biological origins.
Lord Shiva has the third eye which he uses to destroy worlds. You should have known they were real.
It does and it always did.
Why not?
Mantids have five eyes, and most spiders have eight. And look at the mantis shrimp. While it technically only has two eyes, each one of its eyes are subdivided into three smaller sections, each of which can independently look in its own direction. It's not that difficult to imagine different types of vertebrate could have a different number of eyes, as well.
really??
Kairo Makonnen it’s only inward because the skull closed the hole it could see thru :(((
I wouldn't mind having electro-reception. Don't know what I'd use it for, but eh.
We have the technology to replicate it. It's a tiny magnet that is inserted into your fingertip with a needle and it'll allow you to feel electric fields again.
You will know where to hammer in nails without damaging the wiring in the wall
You would probably feel a tingling sensation all the time while in buildings, walls are full of mains wires
Not a good idea if you ask me.
Your Mom: Turn off you phone right now and go to bed.
You: "Wait how did you? . Nevermind."
I used it to preemptively detect lightning.
I can't be sure but I think known nerve damage may be impeding this capability.
Wish we could still breathe under water
We can. SCUBA baby!
A human would need a truly enormous set of gills to get sufficient oxygen to survive.
Try out in your dreams!
@@patrickmccurry1563
Probably, but define your parameters and capacities and calculations or cite sources.
@@ginnyjollykidd .
*Gill Dimensions as a Function of Fish Size*
www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/f69-018?journalCode=jfrbc#.XW3S5ygzaUk
*a brief summary of the above study*
jeb.biologists.org/content/45/1/177
We also have a broken genetic sequence to make Vitamin C. Almost every mammal can make Vitamin C. Presumably our ancestors took up a diet that included the vitamin so the ability wasn't needed. Interestingly, Chimps and Gorillas have the exact same mutation that prevents them from finishing the Vitamin C synthesis proving we have a "recent" common ancestor and that we are more closely related to Chimps and Gorillas than other primates.
A similar destructive mutation affects our ability to process uric acid (causes gout) but only Chimps and Humans have this mutation so we're more closely related to Chimps than Gorillas.
Yes, but without context, it could have been interpreted as an example of convergent evolution.
@@starwarfan8342 The chances of it being convergent evolution is virtually zero because the genetic mutation is in the exact same place in our DNA.
I attended a lecture at Auckland University a few years ago where the lecturer was Graeme Finlay, a microbiologist (and strangely, a Christian) who used the Vitamin C example as 100% proof of our common ancestry with Gorillas and Chimpanzees (and Bonobos of course).
Philip J Fry I just said “what.” out loud to an empty room because of your comment thank you
Philip J Fry Just because we eat differently does not mean that we are not related at all. That’s like pointing out that small species of dogs did not originate from wolves at one point just because they are barely similar anymore. That’s wasn’t natural by any means, it was their domestication by humans that changed their behavior and traits. Humans decided they wanted an animal to help them, so they bred the most domestic wolves together until they could not be classified as true wolves anymore. Then humans decided they wanted their dogs to serve specific purposes (e.g. hunting for big game or rats) each has a different set of requirements to be good at their “job.” Natural selection does what humans have done to dogs, just at a much slower scale. Hence why we don’t need to eat our own poop for digestive flora, however “poop transplants” exist to help repopulated the digestive system after a person somehow had all their digestive flora killed
@Philip J Fry Really?
I could use a melatonin-producing third eye :((
As I understand it, the blue light receptors in our eyes took over that ability.
h
Or just dont use screens heavy in blue light before bed....it doesnt work for me but it works for most people.
@@BadCookWhoJudgesChefs I always have blue light filter on, works like a charm
@@Dnite13 its unnecessary to always have it on but I'm glad it works for you. The scientific literature behind blue light and blue light filters is still far from being conclusive but most scientists would agree that you should limit blue light within a couple hours of bed to be on the safe side.
Evolution took away the hair on my head😞
As it does many people, mostly men, as it is a dominant trait in men and a recessive trait in women.
But be glad! That means that women like men whose traits make men lose their hair, so it is a phenotype -- a visible expression -- of a survival trait! In fact, bald heads are attractive to women. To wit the women who fell in love with Yul Brenner and Telly Savalas. I knew a man who shaved his head of any wisps of hair on his head, and he sported a very handsome head that had a prominent peak on top.
Mohandas Ghandi was bald.
A RUclipsr Simon Whistler (Today I Found Out) has a bald head (partly by shaving) and he himself has a following.
Alas! It isn't popular among women to have bald heads. Some tribes in Africa have bald-headed women who are beautiful with them.
I, on the other hand, lost mine to cancer treatment (I got it back) and I felt devastated without it. I felt naked and a bit ashamed.
One morning when I was still half-asleep, I was being tickled on the ear as happened with my previous hair, and I groused about it. Then I sat up, surprised. "I have hair!" I shouted. I was overjoyed! It was much thinner than before, but it was hair! For a long while I kept it because I didn't trust that it would keep a hairstyle like I had before -- two years after my treatment , to the month -- and I got my hair cut to the short cut I had before, even allowing a bit to be fine-clipped closely to my head. And I am delighted with it!
Enjoy what you have and show it off to your favorite people!
@@ginnyjollykidd The only reason people are more bald today is because the less able ones are not being killed by natural selection.
being bald doesn't make you weak physically. lol.
@@AntonConstanti But mentally...
around 3/4 does
If eugenics had their way, doubtful it would survive
One human trait that I see waning lately is common sense
I would use the word "wisdom" instead. I've seen how much sense the common person has. It's nothing to want for.
"common sense is the rarest of human abilities"
Captain Kirk had made up for losing our 3rd eye, and has the final front ear.
Kirk is named after roman emperor tiberius as all of protagonist of star trek imperial federation you moron
roman emperor Tiberius in time of jesus nero a roman time traveler full of it
Only in profile.
Booooo
Evolution giveth, and evolution taketh away
@Jose Raul Miguens Cruz everything.
@Jose Raul Miguens Cruz ... =/
When will Evolution take away homosexuality genes
@@pumamountainlion7777 WTH is wrong with you?
Evolution pretty much realigned our stat alignment
It's ok. We're still op.
@@montycantsin8861 Not without our tech
@@robinsuj We are, sweating is OP and so is the ability to throw objects accurately. I recommend Tierzoo's video on the subject.
Tierzoo is that u?
@@robinsuj We make our tech, and thats part of our being OP. Unless you believe we stole it from cuttlefish or something.
Then I can't help you.
Ancient Chinese Proverb
"物竞天择，适者生存"
literally translates as
"animals compete nature selects, suitable ones survive on"
What's muscle hanks view on this?
He probably still has all of these traits
I don't think that anyone actually cares about his unfunny attempts at one-note humour.
Amateur0Visionary I find the comments in good humor and in good fun. I think it’s strange people get upset about an innocuous meme. If you don’t like it why don’t you just keep scrolling? No harm done:
@@CaptainPIanet innocuous, yes. I agree. And humour is completely subjective. I simply don't get it. Anyway, mouth shutting.
@Lynxr No U.
The light sensing "third eye" is absolutely about identifying sudden shadows overhead. It's a "dont get eaten" mechanism
Also, it's not useful in species that are primarily the predators. Our eyes migrated towards the front for similar reasons to why we lost that extra eye. If something is going to eat us, it's probably going to be large enough and fast enough that seeing it isn't going to make much of a difference. Chances are it's going to be large, fast and come from behind where the 3rd eye wouldn't have helped anyways as it was pointed towards the front.
Excellent video, but I just wish you had also mentioned photolyases. They are a MAJOR loss shared by all placental mammals - the very reason we get sun burns and skin cancer. Maybe a future episode on that?
You can still get it back. Join us at area 51 on September 20th.
No thanks lolo. I don't fancy taking on the army that will be waiting for the invasion especially when you take into account they will KILL YOU :~)
Were can i sign up
@@planetzodd4849 just turn up. They are twiching as the date gets nearer. They even got Tool to release their album, might even release HL3, but we naruto run into the base and free ET.
@@pegasusted2504 do you even Naruto run?
can't wait til the day they wipe you conspiracy-tards from the planet :)
You said " in fact, we might still be in the process of losing our Jacobson gene"
I like thinking about what we are possibly transitioning from and to. It gives me a sense of novelty. Maybe consider doing a whole episode about other things we could explain by being the very process of that transition ourselves?
I thought for sure vitamin C synthesis would be in this video.
You can look it up: Google is your friend.
If you want tho find out how it works in humans, look up the Krebs Cycle.
@@ginnyjollykidd you are an A-level troll. Heath's comment was perfectly valid.
Even if vitamin C synthesis isn't inn the video, ight is inn most fresh produce and most any animal. Eat your greens and get calcium, iron, and vitamin C.
@@rogaineablar5608
Not a troll. Vitamin C is in the Krebs cycle.
@@rogaineablar5608 You are an S-Level troll, distracting from your trolling with a confusing message trying to invalidate a completely valid point and making an assumption sound like an obvious truth. Well done!
Very cool video. Keep these coming.
I want my uricase enzyme back :: it dissolves uric acid, so can't get gout.
And my theta-defensin gene, it makes it much more difficult to catch AIDS.
Are you doing AID catching activities? 🤔
@@jexsigreysandiego so like going raw on an average western woman?
Don't worry about AIDS. First, you can only catch it by sex or contact with blood by being poked with a contaminated sharp. The odds of catching it from a contaminated sharp (needle or broken glass) is 2 in 1 million. That is 0.0002% whereas catching hepatitis in that way is 1 in 30 or approximately 3.33%.
Nowadays, HIV has evolved into a much milder version such that contracting it no longer causes death. We still don't have a vaccine for it, which I think was part of the reason. It's a very harsh way of evolving parasitism, for parasite and host alike.
HIV was most virulent in the 1980's when it came to the US. Those who got it died within a few years or sooner, as many were immune-suppressed and were ravaged with opportunistic cancers and invaders like cryptosporidium which most people are immune to. The movie _Philadelphia_ is worth watching to see what happened in the 1980's outbreak.
On the other side, because humans were becoming more aware and as a community were practicing safe sex, HIV didn't get much of a chance to spread. It killed many people, but it wasn't like the European Black Plague in the 1300's and 1400's which killed off 2/3rds of Europe's population.
So HIV was relatively isolated. Those it infected it killed. This is its downfall because it didn't get a virus' normal way of reproducing after it made lots of copies of itself. HIV died with its hosts.
Those of us who survived the 1980's lived to reproduce, which is the way of evolution. But, as happens in many evolutionary cases, AIDS or HIV survived. The HIV that survived had a mutation from its 1980's proliferation such that it did NOT kill its host. A parasite that does not kill its host is the most successful parasite.
This is why Herpes zoster--chicken pox--is successful: it lives in a sleep state in a facial nerve--the trigeminofacial nerve--without causing us, its host, to fall ill. That is, until its environment is less stable to the virus, and it breaks out as shingles in older folk.
This milder form of HIV that was selected for no longer is the death sentence of the 1980's. But practicing safe sex in any sexual encounter is still the best way to avoid contracting it even as safe sex is the best way to avoid chlamydia, herpes, candidiasis, gonorrhea, syphilis, and most other STI's.
You don't have to worry about AIDS as long as you practice safe sex.
If you were cut by a sharp contaminated with blood from a person who was HIV positive, it would be 2 inn a million chance tho catch AIDS. It is almost impossible to culture HIV. (A special agar must be used.) I would be more concerned with getting my immunizations before traveling overseas.
@@ginnyjollykidd I would really like to see some evidence in the form of papers confirming that this is the case and a less lethal strain is in fact around
I can listen to Michael narrate and host videos all day long. Such a relaxing and easygoing narrative form. Very enjoyable.
So we devolved instead? Makes sense
...when you look at Trump
No, it’s just that life is a Pass/Fail course. You don’t have to be faster than the lion, just faster than Carl, your annoying neighbor.
This is not anime
@@10aDowningStreet ORANGE MAN BAD
*Mahakaleshwar opens his third eye .*
Evolution have left the earth .
🤔, so mahakaleshwar was a reptile.
@@vellano.1637 You're an idiot.
Has anyone mentioned that mammals, generally, lost four-color vision?
I thought that would be on the video: bird-vision.
I'm an electrical engineer, so I would love to have electro-reception.
- " yeah the circuit breaker is "open", totally safe to work on that pannel"
-"Are you dumb! I can feel the electric field from here, you opened the wrong one "
So you want to be in constantly wired state? I like caffeine 😏
@@veronicaalicea7033 Considering that I'm a night owl who has a ton of early morning meetings? Yeah, I'd love that.
I remember hearing of people doing body modification where they implanted magnets close to nerves in their hands and supposedly they can feel electrical current.
Nostalgia,
Remembering your childhood crush
jacobsan's organ still working since childhood?
I haven't finished the video yet, but I just wanted to say thank you for calming down your presentation a bit! I used to watch SciShow but took a break because most of the time they are just too high energy and the presenter talks so fast. I can keep up, it just doesn't allot me any time to process and form my own thoughts in between things. This is much more calm and just slowed down enough to not make me feel like I'm on a rollercoaster, but still has energy and feeling with the presentation! Keep up the great work! And thanks again! :)
I really like this host. He’s got a calm, smooth voice and seems to not be uncomfortable on camera. Very enjoyable video! Thanks for posting.
Science: we don't sense electricity
Chuck McGill: hold my beer
I feel electricity, and spiritual energy.
The fact that our evolution permitted mental blocks....
Just like most things. New does not necessarily equal progress (tech, social trends etc)
Excellent video. Very interesting and worthwhile.
I like how you speak. You don’t rush all your sentences out in one breath... unlike certain brothers...
Is this in reference to the Carlin Bros
Nah, the Green brothers
The vlog brothers?
@@homebrewedthoughts2033 yes! EverySentenceTheySpeakComesOutLikeThisAndItIrritatesMe.
I've not seen them together but one also does videos on scishow
I'm pretty sure I have electroreception. When I plug things into an outlet and accidentally touch the prongs my body will sense a great deal of electricity.
I think my little sister hsd that too when shd stuck a forknin an outlet
I can sense and hear electric fields, I become annoyed by certain frequencies and it makes it harder to sleep w more noise.
@@PillarofWind That's just sounds produced by electronics
Yeah... When are going to be able to drink saltwater? Why are we on a planet that's mostly undrinkable water? Come on Evolution, you're screw'n us over here!
Sea turtles have this ability they can drink basically salt water because they have an organ that filters out the salt I believe
Because we dont live in water lmao (unless you count the water molecules in the air) but it still wouldn't be salt water NaClO +H2
@@kho5254 With our limited freshwater supply dwindling, we better speed this train up! Haven't you ever been thirsty at the beach and looked at all that water and wondered, why nature, why? Not that anyone should drink unpurified water even if we could drink saltwater.
@@Kehwanna if we needed to we could turn salt water into fresh through filtration since salt water isn't a homogeneous mixture.
@@kho5254 I absolutely agree! I went to college studying economics of transitioning to more sustainable technology and customs and always was excited about the development desalination plants. Sadly the technology is not quite where we want it yet and there are not enough of them at this point in time.
Well screw that, time to dip a spider in plutonium...
I want some 6th sense dang it!
Reiki is a pathway to abilities...some consider to be UN-natuaral...
0:19 basically wrong. It's not surviving UNTIL you reproduce. It's quiet obvious, having a strong, experienced, grown up father to protect you may increase your survivability as an infant. So for the parent it's not only surviving until reproduce, because being alive after the offspring is born is quiet beneficial for the offspring.
I could listen to you read the phone book for hours. Such a relaxing voice.
The thumbnail got me thinking...
If we had a third eye, would we also have a third eyebrow?
well since its not really a real eye and it was to detect the position of the sun, it wouldve problably just looked like a tiny bold spot on your head
@@AllosaurusJP3 But it could have evolved in to a proper eye, eyes in general started out as those tiny light sensing dots.
Imagine trying to put eyeliner on that
@@Nekotaku_TV true
My ex still has a tail, and horns.
And a pitchfork.
@Politically Incorrect Bender Thank you for explaining an obvious joke.
As Satan, I take offense to you comparing me to your ex.
Oh, so the third eye was actually quite literal, that's interesting.
Great video. I think it really just reminds us that humans are all different, and when some people claim to have weird abilities, there's a possibility some old abilities have just come back around! You never know...mutants, where y'all at??
Michael Aranda remains as dreamy as ever.
Give it time, we'll develop extra joints in our thumbs or extra thumbs for phone typing (the individuals in the species who can operate two tinder accounts simultaneously are more likely to pass their genes to the next generation).
That's not how evo works my man.....
Lamarck was wroooong
If thumb skill becomes a trait that is sexually attractive (that could be through other methods too)........some people might advance a more dexterous thumb, into the human genome, in time it might affect the group.
@@Thulgore big "if"....
@@patricioansaldi8021 no hes right
So we could’ve had a real “third” eye. electroreception, and the Jacobson’s organ?!
That would make life way cooler.
Not really. If we don't appreciate our current superpowers, I doubt it would change no matter how many more we had.
So you're telling me human already had triple camera set-up before 2019?
It’s always lovely to see Michael Aranda! Such a calm voice.
Michael has a such smooth voice...
0:15 and to save energy
Evolution divides like a language tree and has a cost save analysis
0:33 that one
1:00 should night valians have that
Often, but not exclusively. Look up laryngeal nerve in giraffes.
We don't have a third eye? Try telling that to Maynard James Keenan.
We do. It's the pineal gland, which is well-protected under the skull. You can find its position by putting the tip of your tongue as far back as you can and touching your soft pallet. The pineal gland is located right above the soft pallet.
@@ginnyjollykidd , according to Annie Savoy, this organ is important for pitchers to throw the ball well.
But we did get a superpower we got the ultimate superpower that's why we, temporarily, rule the planet. We didn't need extra sensors and more organs we developed a big brain. Why would u need to sense pheromones anymore when u can pick up visual and audio clues just as quickly but now we have the ability to reason and problem solve therefore those systems are unnecessary and therefore obsolete.
Not an expert. Just my opinion.
Thanks Scishow
Speaking of superpowers, we can also run really far and throw really well.
@@Icewind007 not sure if id count running as a superpower their are plenty of animals that can do it better.
@@GooseAtron5000 We're the only apes with buttocks, they're for jogging - running down things that are bigger than us over long distances in packs, exhausting them and then using tools to kill them. We sweat, and are virtually hairless for cooling, perfect for a stamina predator. Many predators attack in bursts of energy without much sustain on open ground, but we're a bit more like wolves than cheetahs. We're also very adaptable and flexible to terrain compared to other highly specialised hunters.
Our other superpower is cooking, it's a form of predigestion that allows the skull to accommodate less chewing power and more brain.
Humans use imagination to communicate. We're always building narratives to explain and share everything.
Homo habilis a million years ago eating meat be like oh yeah this is Big Brain time
@@herrschmidt5477 jumpy yummy thing...lol.
This guy has a golden voice! Incredibly soothing!
TL;DR
this video develops 2 misconceptions. I want you to consider 2 points below, having in mind traits cost, sometimes heavy cost.
1) While relaxed selection is a thing (0:25), evolution selects negatively BECAUSE the cost is, in some way, detrimental (0:32). Somehow the video touches the point, but disregard it for the rest of the arguments presented.
Sad thing.
2) Loosing a trait forces the development of a better adaptation, so we loose it not because it lost value (1:49 and 3:30), but because it favored a better way to cope with the same old necessity (4:08) with further benefits. The change was also costly, but payed off.
Detailed.
Any trait, any gene or physiological interaction has a cost, undergoing negative and positive selection pressure AT THE SAME TIME. This is an axiom for biological systems, a philosophy if you like. Utterly underestimated in the video.
1) We don't loose traits because they have low or no value.
See, traits (phenotype, and its genotype distribution) always have a cost. Some have a high cost in physiology, ecology, etc. A pin-point example: Bacteria have plasmids, small circular DNA chains separated from the big genome that encode for antibiotic resistance. They add this heavy cost in extra DNA (negative pressure) produced because it has value (positive pressure). But once the environment doesn't have antibiotics anymore, random bacteria that lost this plasmid reproduce faster (positive pressure without negative pressure), less time time consumed in DNA replication, less resources needed. Thus natural selection favored the loss of trait, no more antibiotic resistance in the population, cost less for living and reproducing.
Relaxed selection doesn't affect phenotype frequency in a population, so it has no impact on natural selection. Explanation: a mutation, called recessive gene (mutated gene), occurs in a single individual and has a 50% chance to disappear in the next generation. Even if an entire family has the mutation, further reproduction will loose it because the dominant gene exists in such overwhelming numbers. Google for Genetic Drift why we have recessive genes in high relative number (high frequency). Mutation mechanisms that affect more then one individual do impact, like a DNA virus that, in a contagion process, inserts itself in the host genome causing it to change somehow.
2) Trait replacement like in 4:08 is tricky: We need, at some point, to have both traits, so that one strengthen (because of net positive pressure) while the other recedes (because of net negative pressure). But they are both complex systems being selected. A system has a core trait or traits, but have marginal traits that connect to other systems, which also undergo a parallel, maybe less selective process. But IT IS NOT a strong trait replacing the older, but rather been strengthened by the negative selection of the older. If the conditions for positive and negative selection continues, regarding costs and value, the systems enter a feedback loop.
As we can see, the topic is very complex. Consider the process that formed the appendix, a diminished organ functionality was costly, so this entire region of the intestines diminished also, as a core residual trait (immunology) justified its existence, but in a very small tissue with less maintenance needed.
We dont need evolution when we have the internet
we need it now more then ever. We need to Evolve so we dont end up as flat earthers or Anti-Vaxxers.
"My spidey senses are tingling!" "No, that's just your electroreceptors."
So use it or lose it
Michael's got a very soothing voice, I keep trying to learn new stuff but I get so relaxed..I don't think I mind 😂
If only our evolution would make us become more friendly and caring
OLBICHL and less douchey
New Ager: as you reach higher levels of consciousness, your third eye will open.
🐸: ribbit.
😂😂😂
*Is there any gene i can activate to give me superhuman abilities* 💪😀
We lost the ability to make our own vitamin C, even though we still have the gene for it.
Thank you for this excellent information.
That literally blew my mind! Great Video!
Well now we need to give evolution an uno reverse card
I want my third eye back
I'm also curious about the people who maybe still have these traits in some way. A gene mutation or reactivated genetic trait that we once had. Such as the sweat of some men smell sweet to some women, like pheromones. or some people's sensitivity to electric fields or anything electronic that they have to move to an isolated town without any tech to avoid suffering headaches.
chicken fingers able lotharios can sense pheromone probably
I am highly scent focused around partners and close friends. I remember their scent so much, it's almost like I feel it in my nose. It could just be a sense of smell though and nothing to do with pheromones.
the second scenario is a prime case of the nocebo effect
Whoa boy, here comes all the new agists and their 3rd eye chakra talk.... lol
It's there, I promise.
Aaron Peters well it’s settled then, as long as you sincerely promise.
The third eye people believe in is not the same as the third eye the video talk about.
@@bishopchalik8561I can really only speak from experience. I hope we figure out how to measure this phenomena in the future.
2:09 If I'm not mistaken, as long as archosaurs dominated the world, mammals or their ancestors were mostly burrowers, and possibly nocturnal. That goes hand in hand with becomming warm blooded, but it makes even more sense to lose a sensor for daylight when you're seldom even exposed to it, so, worth mentioning too. :)
I think he is the best narrator they have .
You know why I don't believe in evolution?
Mothers still have two arms
Sebastian Elytron 😂
But, unlike the Y-chromosome, the female X-chromosomes can all be passed on to a male child. Where would the genes that only gave arms to females hide?
@@emmamemma4162 it was a joke?
I know it is a joke, but how many arms is a mother supposed to have.
a) Is it just funny if one has fewer than 2
b) Is it a joke about women being better at multitasking while having multiple arms.
@@antman7673 Lol BEGONE, you obviously can't take a joke
Windows should definitely take a lesson from evolution
Dear evolution can I have atavism for electroreception ?
Yo this dude is chill and nice to listen to. 10/10
One thing that is always brought up is strength. Among the apes we are lacking, our wrists can do something most of the other apes cannot. That movement advantage/strength disadvantage allows us to thrust with pointy objects. (I could be wrong on this)
“Humans are more evolved”
Debunked
I once dreamed I had a parietal eye. Then it popped like a zit.
0:00
KINGU CRIMSON
Sci-shiwo Show!!!!
Excellent episode!
If it was packed with new examples i would watch an hour of stuff like this.
Thumbnail makes it look like a clickbait video.
I hate that click bait thumbnail. Puts the show in a wrong light.
Stfu
OH DEAR,SO I AM A "THROW BACK"THEN,,,,
BEST NOT TO ASK!!
PS,NOT SHOUTING,VISUALLY IMPAIRED.X😎❤X.
I want an extra eye so I can use it to constantly watch Sci-Show while I'm doing other things.
His voice is so relaxing.
Lamarck was right
(this comment was made by the epigenetics gang)
In a way
we still have the abilities comes under the "umbrella" of Primary Perception. Ingo Swann was a master of some of these abilities.
Lord Shiva has a third eye which he uses to destroy worlds.
So he kills that's types of God you workshiping!
@@somairasa3732 you are such a deluded guy. If shiva is doing for good then he Doesn't need to kill all he just need to kill those who are mentally evil. That's why shiva is not worthy of worshiping because he don't care whether good of bad he will kill you all.
Informative ..... Thanks for posting
we still have the third eye, it's there on an energetic level as the third eye chakra which resides within the pineal gland. there's piezoelectric crystals in there which give off DMT which is responsible for dreams and seeing life flash before one's eyes before death
When I was on mushrooms I swear I had semi predator vision.
Who’s the CEO of evolution🤬🤬🤬
I swear, before the thumbnail loaded in, I thought this was a Pokemon video.
Cool video man
This series is really enjoyable. Thank you.