Proof That The Geneva Bible Is Inferior To The King James Bible
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024
- I have heard this lie for years. I lost count of how many times people have written in the comments of my videos, how the Geneva Bible is SUPERIOR to the King James Bible. Most of these people are not aware that they have been deceived by a clever advertising agenda. In this video I will be showing proof that the Geneva Bible does in fact contain some very serious errors, which were corrected by the translators of the Authorized Version.
My Official Website: kjvm.org
How to be saved:
A Salvation Message: • A Salvation Message
What Is TRUE Biblical Salvation?: • What Is TRUE Biblical ...
The 7 Parts Of Biblical Salvation: • The 7 Parts Of Biblica...
If you have been blessed by the teaching and preaching of this ministry, (and if the Lord leads you to) we would like you to prayerfully consider donating to King James Video Ministries. ALL of our videos are given FREELY to anyone who wants to watch them, but it costs us a lot of time and money to do this. My channel is NOT monetized on RUclips, and we rely solely on the body of Christ to support us, according to 1 Corinthians 9:7-11.
Our Donation page with a PayPal Link: kjvm.org/donat...
Give Send Go Link: www.givesendgo...
You can also send checks, money orders, or cash directly to our ministry.
Our ministry address is:
King James Video Ministries
P.O. Box 214
Patten, ME 04765
I no longer have an email account due to receiving thousands of emails every day. I can not write back to everyone. If you need to get in contact with me, please send a letter to the ministry address above. If you want to send something to Katherine or Oliver, PLEASE DO NOT PUT THEIR NAME ON THE ENVELOPE. Just send it to my name (Bryan Denlinger) or to the ministry name (King James Video Ministries). Thank you very much.
Psalm 12:6-7
1).Tyndale 1534
2). Coverdales 1535
3). Matthews 1537
4). Great Bible 1539
5). Geneva Bible 1560
6). Bishops Bible 1568
7). King James Bible 1611
The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Psalm 12:6-7
A.V.
Amen. Richard Bancroft's _"Rules to be Observed in the Translation of the Bible"_ reveals this truth too.
The KJV was basically the NIV of its day.
Why did they already need a new bible version?
@@FaithLikeAMustardSeeddon’t ever compare the satanic NIV to God’s perfect word
@@EternallyBornAgain It's surprising to me that God's Word didn't exist before 1611 and is only for people who can read English at a collegiate level.
@@FaithLikeAMustardSeedthat is a false statement. Recent studies show a 6th grade reading level is required to read the King James Bible. You hate the KJV because you hate things like rightly dividing and the dispensation of grace. I bet you’re one of those people who believe God promised you land in the Middle East.
As an Assyrian who's language is Aramaic, I can confirm that the KJV is the closest and most accurate translation of the 616AD Aramaic translation of the scriptures The Peshitta. There is nothing more accurate than the KJV.
That's great to hear from a native Aramaic speaker, and it's exactly what I expected.
@@martinmummert5614 Hi. Do you read only KJV?
@@ourdailybread1099 Yes, I believe the King James Bible is the only pure and perfect translation in English.
@@martinmummert5614 Agreed. You should look into older, ancient texts from the Middle East, you will learn a lot. For example, you will learn who Gog is, as Gog is in our Assyrian history, and you learn more about what country will be doing what as things get worse. KJV is amazing because it has plenty of ancient, aramaic words in it too, which I personally enjoy.
@@martinmummert5614
There’s no such thing as a perfect translation. Close to perfect would be a transliteration. Perfect is the language in which it was written.
That said, i use the 1537 Matthew’s and 1611 KJV…I also refer to the Septuagint when necessary for comparisons.
I'm glad the Geneva Bible wasn't corrupted by Codex sinaticus and codex vaticanus
Zechariah 9:9 in geneva says "saved himself" meaning He hiimself saved us. The notes for which geneva is famous clearly explain this and other verses like Goliaths brother, etc. The other alleged errors in geneva are merely and obviously distinctions without a difference. Job says exact punishment in kjv, geneva says forgotten by God. Same thing, being forgotten by God is exacting punishment.
I use the 1537 Matthew’s Bible and 1611 KJV in their original spellings and blackletter fonts. Yeah, most people won’t be able to read these but give it half an hour to an hour and you will read it easily.
The story behind the Matthew’s Bible is really interesting. You folks can find info online if interested. (It’s just the Tyndale and Coverdale bibles with additional translations to make it complete)
Why we still stuck on this? either or geneva or KJV is a lot better than anything out today. I am curious on the Book of Demonology King james also had put out also what that was even about
It's simple. We must have ONE single standard, and not two that even mildly conflict eachother.
Don’t even know why I commented I only got KJV
I publicly apologize on here for all the times i wrote comments about the Breeches Bible. I'm sorry for😢 that and will not write such things ever again.
Everyone should read the preface of the KJV and see what the translators said about it.
You are wasting your time here, Satan. The King James Bible is God's Perfect, Preserved and Inspired Word.
@@childofthelight888 Your casual and unprovoked hatred of the brethren for suggesting that we read the information the KJV translators gave us is proof positive that you are a child of hell.
I am currently reading through the 1599 Geneva Bible. And the Ferrar Fenton Bible. I am also reading King James, of course, but I wanted to read a couple other versions this year.
Proof is in the word, true word of God prevails out throughout time, forever
Excellent video. I'd also like to add the most popular reason why so many people today have become anti-King James and pro-Geneva: *_Ephesians 6:12,_* which reads in the Geneva Bible as:
Ephesians 6:12 (GB) For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, *_and against the worldly gouernours,_* the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.
These pro-Geneva/anti-King James guys reject the King James Bible because Ephesians 6:12 in the KJV does not say "against the worldly gouernours". They accuse King James of having removed those words from the Bible because he [supposedly] was a tyrant who didn't want his subjects to question his authority. But these fools don't even realize that the verse literally contradicts itself. Take another look:
Ephesians 6:12 (GB) *_For we wrestle not against flesh and blood,_* but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.
The "worldly gouernours" ARE "flesh and blood". The verse clearly contradicts itself in the Geneva Bible.
And touching on the claim that America was founded on the Geneva Bible and not the King James Bible, that is a claim made by people who are very ignorant of American history. The Congress of the Confederation in 1782 gave Robert Aitken's printing of the KING JAMES BIBLE the Congressional Approval AND officially recommended it to the inhabitants of the United States. The approval was printed in the front of Aitken's KJV, which you can read here for yourself:
_"Philadelphia, September 10th, 1782._
_Honble James Duane, Eſq. Chairman, and the other Honble Gentlemen of the Committee of Congreſs on Mr. Aitken's Memorial._
_Whereupon,_
_RESOLVED,_
*_THAT the United States in Congreſs aſſembled highly approve the pious and laudable undertaking of Mr. Aitken,_* _as ſubſervient to the intereſt of religion, as well as an inſtance of the progreſs of arts in this country, and being ſatiſfied from the above report of his care and accuracy in the execution of the work,_ *_they recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States,_* _and hereby authoriſe him to publiſh this Recommendation in the manner he ſhall think proper._
_CHA. THOMSON, Sec'ry."_
And on top of that, George Washington, our first president, was sworn into office on a KING JAMES BIBLE.
That letter will be useful addition to my arsenal in convincing people about the superiority of the perfect King James Bible.
@@user_fnnrqGpb2Ac0_3HX40-IA Amen amen amen amen 🙏🙏🙏🙏📖🙏
Amen! Thank you for this. Although, I believe that George Washington was sworn in on the Inaugural Bible which is a Ma sonic KJB that has their own illustrations and commentary. St. John's Lodge No. 1, of the Ancient York, are the custodians of what is now known as the George Washington Inaugural Bible.
I publicly apologize for all the comments I made on here in the past about the Geneva Bible.
The Pilgrams set up shop in Plymouth Bay November 11, 1620, a little before George's time.
If you look to the notes on the side of the Geneva Bible next to the verse in Zechariah 9:9 with the letter (m) you will see written "That is, he hathe righteousness, and Salvation in him felt for the use and commoditie of his Church".
I also checked the Strongs Concordance for the word "Price" which is "Wakar" H7986 which means: "Payment of contract; concretely {salary} fare 6 maintenance; by implication {compensation}. Benefit: - {hire} {price} reward {[-ed]} {wages} worth.
No. Not arguing over Bibles, Preaching CHRIST crucified.
It's pretty wild how so many think they're saved because of which translation of the bible they read.
Then they turn and sin against believers because of it and have no idea the peril they are in.
@@FaithLikeAMustardSeedthey still changed the armor of GOD. So people would be confused on dark rulers vs government. Basically saying all governments are not good. Today they all are proving they are not good. Point out one government that is good
The KJV isn’t perfect, it’s the best we have but it certainly isn’t perfect. There’s no such thing as a perfect translation…ask any professional translator fluent in both languages. Close to perfect would be a transliteration. Perfect is the language in which it was written. This goes for any book, not the Bible specifically.
Check Genesis 6;4 in the original Hebrew and the KJV English.
The word I’m talking about isn’t “Giants”, but “Nephilim” from “Naphal”; the ‘perfect’ translation would be “Fallen Ones”, i.e., the offspring of Fallen Angels and human women.
This is merely one example of an imperfect translation of a single word.
Those who mistakenly believe angels cannot take human form must refer to Hebrews 13;2
“Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some have unwittingly entertained angels”
Genesis 6:4 is always brushed aside with false ideology to mean something contrary to that which is stated clearly.
Don’t let anyone take away the “supernatural” elements of the Bible as the whole thing is “supernatural”. Existence itself is Biblical.
Side Note: See Gary Wayne Genesis 6 for more info on Gen6. It is a great read. (2 volumes)
Says here in my strong concordance giants translation, nephiyl or nephil. Meaning a bully or tyrant. Just had to check you...
Not arguing any further about it. God bless
No perfect translation? So you base your faith on possible flawed lies and hypocrisy? How can you even believe at all if you can't have anything solid to base your faith on? On your logic, it's possible that salvation we believe in could be in error and we may not even be saved right now. How sickening.
Check out a video by Pastor Robert Breaker called Fallen angels, demons, giants and clones. They're 💯 giants. Where do you think Goliath came from? Or how would you explain numbers 13:33?
From my research the issue with the KJB is why did the King ordered Bible Translator William Tynsdale killed? Do you think the correct interpretation to priest rather than elder is important????
There were about fifty translaters that worked on translation.
The old Testament was translated by devout Hebrew men called Masorites.
Not a Greek into English.
The Geneva Bible has roots back to Augustine, and John Calvin influence.
You're getting the English kings mixed up. It was king Henry VIII (a Catholic at heart) who ordered the execution of Tyndale, not king James.
Did you notice the note 2 in your own bible of Zac 9:9 actually said "saving himself?"
But can we say the Geneva Bible is corrupt? Wouldn't that mean that God gave those saints before 1611 a corrupt Bible? Should we instead say that the Geneva is great but not as perfect and accurate as the KJV?
He didn't say the Geneva Bible was corrupt, he said that it wasn't perfect like the KJV.
@@AnthonyTuminello agreed brother! So you would say the Geneva Bible is a great translation just not as perfect as the KJV? That’s what I would say, I just want to know if that’s the best thing to say.
@@SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever Yes, for God did use it in its time, but since the KJV came about, it has been done away with.
1 Corinthians 13:10
[10]But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
Hebrews 7:22
[22]By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.
Not many will take my words serious but the NKJV has "for now" become much superior to the KJV due to the supernatural changes. Laugh all you want. Bible prophesied this. If you think thats nonsense and cannot see it, then you never knew the Bible as you think you do. Look at Matthew 9:17 and compare. Not wineskins anymore which makes the parable void of all meaning. Countless more "supernatural" changes. Jesus now says "slay them before me" and much more. An entire sea of residue evidence exists that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a supernatural thing going on to change words. KJV now says "take up your couch" when it used to say bed (as in sleeping matt). Most of you dont even know the bible as you think you do, not even capable to see the changes in the first place.
Is it out of print? I only see it for kindle.
The appeal to age fallacy, also known as appeal to tradition, is a logical fallacy that assumes something old is automatically better than something new
I was on a biblical forum recently and a fellow user of the forum posted a trap since he knows that I am a KJV supporter. He asked in a thread why did the bible state in Exodus 22:18 to not to suffer a witch to live and referenced King James and his translators as changing the word of God to validate King James's witch hunts.
First off I answered that
The word mekhashepha was translated as "witch" in the Ben Yehuda Hebrew Dictionary
In the book of Samuel 28:9, the bible references the witch of Endor and her concern about being killed.
The mental gymnastics that people purportrate to discount the KJV is endless....
Jesus Christ is a perfect God who is a perfect man who is perfectly righteous who gave a perfect sacrifice who also gave his perfect word.
There's also an issue with the widespread notion that Wycliffe translated from Jerome on the word of John Purvey, Wycliffe's post-mortem editor who proved to be an Augustinian& Romanist sympathizer. And with the alchemists. Newton was an occultist who promoted his god of forces under the pretense of being 'baptist' (certainly not the sort of baptist John Smyth was who chose to take the whipping& stocks rather than to enter& worship in a 'steeple house' during the 1600's); & it's difficult to fathom how lying 007 John Dees & Mr. Green were any different from the older Augustinian & Hermetic alchemists. My contention is that there is no difference. Both are false nicolaitan and craft. I believe the underlying Augustinian & TULIP / master level nicolaitan MK sorcerer error was what led to Ian Paisley's capitulation, as well as to the 'baptist' Charles Haddon Hidden Hand Spurgeon w/ his Metropolitan Tabernacle built in the neo-pagan Sir Christopher Wren model. And contend that Bullingerism is what drives the pseudo King James Bible users of the IFB, & sadly, most independent baptists of today.
Which edition of the KJV do you adhere to?
1611 KJV
@@cheypotier9199 Which edition? PCE?
I would love to see Brother Bryian awnsering this because it's hard for us outside USA to find kjv bible. I want to buy a big one like he has but it's hard to find or order online 😢
He always recommended the Cambridge editions of the KJV, but any standard edition, including the original 1611, is fine. Still the perfect word of God at the end of the day.
@@AnthonyTuminello I know a lot of people who are dogmatic on this issue since not all KJV's are the same.
I would say it is on the same level as the KJV.
How is it same level if they have clear differences?
@@TheRealName7 Because your belief that an English translation from the original languages is somehow "perfect," is deeply flawed.
@@makarov138 at that point go read a copy of the original greek manuscripts
So we should be reading all 80 books then.
Hey which version of kjv is best? The 1611 or the regular one?
Font and spelling is the only difference. Standard KJV is more accessible to us for that reason.
Get a KJV that includes the Apocrypha.
@@Tyler_KJVAIf they want to they can, but there is no need, because the Apocrypha is NOT inspired.
@@Tyler_KJVA why?
@@AnthonyTuminello It is inspired.
the kjv has had over 80 edtions since 1611 both the geneva and 1611 had the apocropha and had it removed
so when ppl say kjv is the best i have to ask what edtion or year and its funny most ppl just say 1611 but cant read it and dont know the apcropha in there lol
God uses a Bible ? I read both Bibles and don't have a preference. How exactly is it that a Bible is named after a earthly king? I agree the KJV is a good Bible but I disagree with the Geneva being faulty. I know which Bible changed the world more for the better and I know the KJV has been in effect for the last century uncontested. The Bibles are a record of God's word they are not God's word. Worshiping a Bible would be no different than worshiping the Talmud. The Bible is not God nor did the record of God create ; God's word real and living made everything. This worship of books smacks of Sadducee type behavior. Say what you want but ,the Romanists generally declare the "Calvinist" a vile heretic yet they rarely have anything negative to say about the Episcopalian. I don't even see churches titled "the church of Calvin"; Maybe if the great scholars hate the "Calvinists" they were doing something right. Groups of scholars certainly have the world in state now maybe they always have. Usually impressed with this narrators insights but am sadly disappointed by this narration. Very worldly and way less than meaningful. Somehow suggesting that the catholic preachers were responsible for the Bible being printed in the common language of the peoples in the different areas.
im waiting for someone to respond to this
I Have The KJV, But I Don't Use The KJV. I Use The Modern Versions.
what about the tyndale bible? i sometimes like to read that one next to my kjv
Yes, Tyndale’s translations were great. I think the best English Bible we have is the Matthew Bible, which used Tyndale’s NT, and his work that he did on the OT, and filled the rest from Coverdale’s Bible. With John Rogers’ editing.
I do not believe the KJB is the perfect bible many are claiming it to be. It has added confusion into the word in many places.
@@derekk1how did it add confusion?
@@Hbuignc by making things harder to read and understand in many places (there was one verse I read that was like gibberish). And by making other places ambiguous (look at Romans 1:20.. his eternal power and Godhead are things that are made, according to the most natural reading of the verse). And by changing things to not make sense (look at Genesis 31:24.. do you really think God told Laban not to say anything good to Jacob?
All I can say is, go through both side by side, and look at the differences, and see for yourself what makes more sense, and what is more clear. If you think it’s the KJV, then by all means continue using the KJV. I came to the conclusion that the Matthew Bible seemed better.
Do you have any thoughts on the inclusion/removal of the Apocryphal texts from the 1611?
FAQ 2: Why Did The AV1611 Contain The Apocrypha?
ruclips.net/video/AlE_2qJIKlI/видео.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
You don't have to be saved if you're completely righteous in all ways! Duuu
I was reading the Geneva Bible and it’s interesting how they didn’t have the letter j and they used V instead of U
That was also the case with the 1611 KJV. The English language and it's spelling was not yet standardized, and the letter J wasn't adopted into the English language until the late 1620s.
Does anyone know about the Oahspe bible ?
Hi Bryan, I've always had this doubt, what is Zechariah 5 all about and who is the woman called wickedness? I would appreciate it if you would take the time to answer my question. thanks...
I wouldn't trust anything coming out of Switzerland.
Even the Swiss army knife?
...but but but the Duke and Calvin know best😂
NOT🎉
@@Ron-w8m especially the knife 😆 🤣
How about Swiss cheese? 🧀 🤔
I happen to be Swiss German American. I wouldn't trust anything coming out of America. All the modern Vatican 🇻🇦 versions of the Bible came from the United States 🇺🇸 Bible Society
Keep supporting the governments favorite Bible - Ephesians 6:11-12 clearly shows why the government LOVES the kjVERSION
Then by KJV they will be delivered as such.
Not many people know about the first Bible printed and published n 1531 Zurich 🇨🇭 Switzerland. Christoph Froschauer was a printer in Zurich who Huldrych Zwingili paid to print and publish the Zurich Bible. Zwingili translated the Massoretic Hebrew and Greek Textus Receptus into Swiss German 4 years before Martin Luther published and printed his first edition.. The Froschauer Bibel was the Bibel of the Swiss Brethren. The Froschauer Bibel was the favored version of the Swiss Brethren, and their succesors for many generations falsely called anabaptists by Calvinist Zwingili and his state sponsored religion. Conservative Mennonites in America 🇺🇸 started reading the King James Bible 100 years ago and Conservative Amish use the King James Bibel along with the Froschauer Bibel
Can I ask why we dont use the septuagint, earlier accurate.
I’ll take the purified 7x & perfected words of God over a rough draft any day. There’s a reason why the “free sons of Ma” use the KJV and push the corrupted versions to the rest of the world. Why wouldn’t the devils want to have God’s pure word of truth for himself, for his own devices, and for everyone else to have the modern word of man?
True knowledge of God is powerful and leads to freedom. The Lord Jesus Christ himself said, “ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Jo. 8:32 KJV This was very helpful. Thank you.
You know, he never said anything about TLV and Hallelujah Scriptures. 😊
Cristiano Should Read The Genevea Bible
Bible is not in the Bible don’t use the word Bible. (Yee hypocrite)
Yes - Yeshua is saved - He carried YOUR sins to hell for you and His disciples couldn’t stay awake to pray Him through it so yeah, He saved Himself - He who became so who knew no sin- FOR YOU - He saved Himself for you
The KJ Bible has a good backup which is The Strongs concordance.
Strong was an atheist lawyer who decided he would disprove the bible. Halfway through he became a believer in the God Jehovah. His work is what he left us and it is mighty good.
Absolutely empty points here. Taking scripture that predates KJV and labeling it wrong absolutely baffles me. Based on your points I’d honestly be leaning towards the Geneva book.
You're only kidding your own people...
You'll never see the word "tyrant" in the kjv
That is sad. There is no divine right of Kings. Divine right of Kings is a Roman Catholic corrupt doctrine
@@AndreasHaueter77 Read Ecclesiastes 8:4
Thank you Bryan. Interesting history but let’s thank The Lord that He’s given us the perfect word of God in The King James Bible. God bless you all. Bill Uk
😂😂😂😂😂
Geneva is WAY BETTER than KJV 💩
Could you explain please? I have a kj New Testament and was thinking about getting a Geneva Old Testament/new testament but because of this video I will not. But I’d like like to hear your thoughts
I never knew about the Geneva Bible until yesterday from another channel he uses it then you come out with this I have my answer I was asking about thank you for this .... your thoughts on chuck misslers teachings would be appreciated
What gets me how a Presbyterian John Knox follower, James Stewart, the 6th King of Scotland, the son of the Roman Catholic tyrant queen, His mother , Mary.who f persecuted calvinists all over England, and Scotland, caused the Highland and lowland clearances of his own people became King James the 1st of 🇬🇧 England'. Being the first Presbyterian King of England, James Stewart had grace on the Puritans to translate the 2nd Authorized version . Laurence Chadderton, known as the great patriarch of the Puritan movement, was one of the translators of the 2nd Authorized version of King James. He lived over 100 years . He was born in 1536 and died in 1640😮
@@AndreasHaueter77 King James' mother was not Mary I of England (Mary Tudor, aka "Bloody Mary"), it was Mary Stuart (aka "Mary, Queen of Scots"). Howbeit, both were Catholics, but Mary Stuart did not persecute Protestants like Mary Tudor did.
The Lord waited for a king with a Jewish name: James is Jacob, coming at just the foreseen & perfect time. He also prepared him in an upbringing during which he witnessed the hypocrisies & inconsistencies of both the openly Catholic blaspheming kingdom builders (his own mother groomed by that witch Catherine& Loyola's Luciferians) & that of the persecuting Daughters, the Puritans. James was quite capable of independent, non-conciliar ....non-Presbyterian, conscientious choice. And they ALL hated him for it!!
The enemy has sowed many tares amongst the wheat.
prob both books are manipulated by the catholic church
No! Not the King James Bible.
During the 30 years war Calvinists and Lutherans were murdering each other in Germany 🇩🇪
You should do a video on the scopfield Reference Bible. According, my research is one of the most distructive things they've ever done.
Thanks, Blessed Brother Bryan, for showing the evidence and showing the difference between the Breeches Bible and the second Authorized Version. The LORD GOD JESUS THE CHRIST bless you, your family and ministry HE gives you to do on the Internet, Rumble and RUclips.
Servetus for the win🎉
Edit: I dont believe the narrative about Jefferson and his Bible book. I believe it was an attempt to short-story in a fashion of the Elliot Bible, for others and indian/natives/children.
Jefferson spoke about Servetus in letters.
Hey brother . I debate using gamantria from the KJV to destroy all false book and religions. I would loveeeee to have you on the channel. Do you have discord or some way of contacting
You do know if you saw king Jimmy and yelled out.. hey James. He wouldn't even turn arround. THERE WAS NO J SOUNDS!!!!!!!!
can you explain to me the huge differences in john 3:36? Geneva bible moves the goalpost of salvation and says it's obedience, the kjv says its just belief... that's a pretty big and important detail that can mean the difference between heaven and hell. one says work your way to salvation and the other says just believe. this has made me so nervous. i spent 7 years as a depressed alcoholic and just got my act together after a friend got me back into church awhile back... i worry about my past choices all the time. it torments me. i have accepted jesus as my lord and savior but i've not been living for him until now. this mess about the Geneva bible got me listening to you to clear things up hopefully.
Please Remember... It Is Written! KJV - Hebrews 11 : 6 “But Without FAITH It Is IMPOSSIBLE To Please HIM: For HE That Cometh To GOD MUST BELIEVE That HE
Is, And That HE Is A Rewarder Of THEM That DILIGENTLY Seek HIM.” AMEN!!!
@@BADDMIXX you just dropped a little bit of knowledge that i needed. i love God and i want to seek him. thanks.
I'm glad my Amish family uses and believes in The King James Bible in German and English.
The Most High God's true accurate and *infallible* Written Word would actually lay on the ancient Sumerian clay tablets. All the controversy is silly. *1611 KJV* being a pivotal translation for spreading The Most High God's Written Word for that time and place (western world) is certainly *true.* But not to be confused with or looked at as anything more than a regular book, other than that it was put together by the guise of the Holy Spirit according to the will of the Most High God, which was to give humans the benefit of the doubt upon receiving His message to than become hearers and doers of His Word in order to *possibly* become salt of the earth by bringing Glory to the Almighty Creator by becoming a living sacrifice or a shining light of truth (truth being The Lord's Holy Word) where there is darkness, only made possible through our saving faith which was made possible for sinners by the perfect & Holy act of Mercy of the Lord through His perfect act of selfless bloodshed, suffering and death to put an end to the sins of the world and rise again to eliminate death & anoint all who believe in Him as being God in the flesh until he returns to earth again the same way he left. This too is the Most High God's perfect picture of His sacrificial love to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear that the Holy Creator desires nothing more than to have a unconditionally loving, joyous, deeply personal & everlasting relationship with *ALL* of humanity on an individual scale within His Holy & Everlasting Heavenly Kingdom.
May the Grace of the Lord be with whoever read this. ❤
*Maranathna.*
1611 KJV Authorised ! God bless !
They’re so desperate to dethrone the AV 😑makes me think of:
15
“And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.”
A flood of confusion and “translations” to carry away the church
He was baptized by John the Baptist remember
Your thorough study put into this video has really helped me. Im even more confident in continuing to read my kjv. Thank you so much.
The KING JAMES BIBLE IS SUPERNATURAL
This Video is an Awesome Work! Keep up the good Work! I'll share it and bookmark it!
Interesting note The Bishop's Bible was authorized by King Henry the 8th.. Bishop's Bible was the first authorized version of the Anglican Church.. That means the King James Bible is the second Authorized Version of the Anglican Church . The 2nd Authorized Version acknowledged by King James is the perfected polished version.
Very nicely done brother. So glad you addressed this. The providence of God should be obvious with this matter but people still waste time being duped by marketing and those with an axe to grind against King James and the Bible approved and exalted by God.
Thank you for the work you do for God and all of us. Really do appreciate you
J’ai commencé avec la Genève, mais grâce à toi mon frère je suis maintenant avec la KJ (quelle différence !!!!!! ) , merci infiniment mon frère……. Merci
Thanks! I've been curious about the Bibles that preceded the King James Bible.
You may call the claim of Geneva being "better" a lie, I use the Geneva 1599 to draw YHWHs law from and apply it accordingly, always offering repentance first. I'll be looking forward to your video about how the word "jew" is an invented word used to mask other words, even in the KJV
I truly love to watch your sermons and I have learned and grown so much in Christ. I have 1 quick question that isn't really pertaining to this study. I was reading in Daniel 7:9 in my KJV and it mentioned Ancient of Days in several scriptures in that chapter....can you please tell me who that is referring to
Please see his video The Godhead In Daniel 7:13?
ruclips.net/video/kj4BQtQggHg/видео.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
I would venture to say that would be the soul, God the Father, but if I am wrong here, someone else please jump in here!
Thank you I found this video very helpful as I recently freely acquired a Geneva Bible. Started to look into it and found your video. What I do like about this though are the apocrypha. Having Baruch and second Ezra is nice.
Sir Francis Bacon, gave the world modern English by gathering the best in Europe to help him Translate the KJV, and at the same time giving the world a new refined language. It necessarily is correct. Also he wrote the Shakes Spear plays.. to again introduce a new refined language to England and the world.
FAQ 7: Was The KJV Written By Sir Francis Bacon?
ruclips.net/video/Um20NIgyCT4/видео.html&ab_channel=BornAgainBarbarian
@@ChantreJ yes, dude is clueless. Modern English was introduced with the KJV per Bacon. It necessarily was translated correctly. What better way to introduce a language? How can any of it be wrong!? It's the words created using the greatest book of all time to do it! The 47 knights of the helmet were commissioned by Bacon. What a clueless bunch of weirdo talk to say Bacon was not involved
Thank you for the this explanation. There are lot of people trying to push the Geneva Bible in the last year claiming since it’s older it’s more accurate. This is clearly not the case.
KJVER by Whitaker House.
Its the modernized 1611 KJV.
Malachi 2:16 is one of the only passages in the old testament where God speaks on his view of divorce. In the Geneva God instructs the israelites that hate their wives to divorce them. The King James in this same verse makes it clear that he HATES divorce "putting away" as the passage says. Jesus affirms this stance on divorce in the gospels (Matthew 19:8). This is a serious error on the Genevas part.
You hit the nail on the head, the Geneva was a good translation in many ways and had its place in the process of perfecting the english translation of God's word But it will never take the place of what God has used and blessed for the last 400+ years, the Authorized version of 1611, the King James Bible.
These studies are your bread and butter bro thank you good to see another one 👏🏻
Amen, Bryan.
This is wild how you come out with this I was talking with someone today and the bible version came up and he tried telling me the Matthew bible was an older and better version, but he can't convince me any difference. Almost everyone wants to put the KJV down.
It wasn’t me, was it lol? But I do believe the Matthew Bible is better, and I tell others that at times, that the MB is the English version I recommend.
Time is money,therefore you sir are a very rich man
All of your time invested into research are much appreciated by me,for I myself do not have the time nor books for these types of indept studies
May the good Lord Jesus Christ bless and keep thee and thy family save,much love from your brother in Christ;Gali Silvano
Thank you for your work!
The good ol overhead
Geneva Bible forever
Sad.
@@AnthonyTuminello be sad all you want I ain't never using KJV except to expose it as the Bible of Babylon
@@pastor-brandon John 8:47 (KJV) He that is of God heareth God's words: *_ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God._*
@@pastor-brandon You call yourself "Pastor", and your latest video is "Jesus is not the Father"...
Yeah, no wonder you hate the King James Bible. You're lost.
@pastor-brandon is title of pastor in GB?
Excellent video, glad I recently subscribed!!!!
Unbothered gem
As for me and my house we will serve the Lord Jesus Christ and His Perfect word!!! And NO I don't give a rats butt what the Hebrew or Greek says. I will live and die bye the KJV1611 AV.
Thank you, God bless