The KJV Is Corrupt, Exposing the King James Version of the Bible
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
- Exposing the King James Version of the Bible Narration
Website: KJVisCorrupt.com
Contents
What is the King James Version?
English Bibles prior to KJV
Geneva Bible - principal rival and motivation for the KJV
Influence of Latin and the Catholic Rheims New Testament
The KJV as divine inspiration
Interpretive bias and stylistic variation in the KJV
Inclusion of the Apocrypha
KJV not an instant success
Textural corruption of the KJV
Erasmus and Comma Johanneum
Mistranslations in the Authorized Version of 1611
KJV vs. Aramaic Peshitta
Misattribution of Hebrews to Paul
The misuse of KJV today
Integrity Syndicate Websites:
Integrity Syndicate - 1st Century Christianity - www.integritysyndicate.com
BestEnglishTranslations.com - Identifying the Best English Translations of the Bible
Apostolic Teaching Sites
lovefirst.faith - Love Comes First
EssentialGospel.faith - Understanding the core message of the Gospel
GospelOfActs.com - Discovering the Gospel of Acts
NotUnderTheLaw.net - We are not under the law (not being outside the law of God) but under the law of Christ
ApostlesDoctrine.net - Following the teaching of the Apostles
BaptismInJesusName.com - Following the original form of Christian baptism
PrayerIsNecessary.com - An overview of the importance of prayer with guidelines on how we should pray
Biblical Unitarian Sites:
trueunitarian.com/ - The foundations of Biblical Unitarianism
onegodonelord.faith/ - Understanding the distinction between one God, the Father, and one Lord, Jesus Christ
biblicalagency.com/ - Understanding the Law of Agency - A Key Biblical Concept Pertaining to Christ
onemediator.faith/ - The essential humanity of the one mediator Jesus Christ
iamstatements.com/ - Understanding how Jesus identifies himself in the Gospels
jesusisthemodel.com/ - Understanding how Jesus is the model for us
understandinglogos.com/ - The true meaning of the Word in the prologue of John
formofgod.com/ - Analysis of Philippians 2 - Exaltation not preexistence
preexistenceofchrist.com/ - Understanding in what sense Christ preexisted
bibleconflations.com/ - Refuting erroneous conflations of Scripture used to infer Jesus is ontologically God
controllinginfluence.com/ - Understanding what is the Holy Spirit
trinitydelusion.net/ - Dispelling the delusion of the Trinity
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
#IntegritySyndicate #KJV
Thank God for William Tyndale,
yikes. let God be true but every man a liar
Thank you Jesus, this integrity syndicate, just confirmed for the thousands time, how precious my King James Bible is. Thank you, my LORD and SAVIOR. All hail KING JESUS. AMEN
A LOT of people have gotten converted over the years using the King James Version Bible. The authors of this video are "oneness" "Jesus Only" people, but if there is no Trinity why did Jesus Christ pray to His Father on several occasions?
A lot of people have also went to hell because false teachers, preachers dont know how to rightly divide scripture, and lead people astray. Satan is crafty. Religion is all the different ways to go to hell. 1 Cor.15:1-4 is the Gospel of our Salvation and Ephesians 1:10-14 is our assurance. Jesus didn’t say “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only son, that whosoever joins a church, pays tithes, gets baptised, does good works, adds to the finished work of the cross, and believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life”.
Funny question. If I am not my father and mother, then why do I talk to my father on the phone on several occasions? Because I am not my father,. Otherwise, I would talk to myself.
There is no Trinity! Plus Jesus isn't God either!
NONSENSE!@@mrg466
@@mrg466You will one day regret this. I hope and pray you find peace within yourself and ask Jesus to show you who he really is.
There’s one thing for certain, every single atheist who took their very last breath no longer became an atheist once it’s too late to repent
You are not saved by having a certain Bible translation on your lap, you’re saved by trusting the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ which was shed for your sins.
Sadly you do not know the power of the word.
Amen @ishiftfocus1769
A man of commonsense which is becoming rare in these days. I have read the KJV and Geneva bible and the NKJV and NASB and Living bible and l prefer the latter translations.
No, you are saved by regeneration. Being born again.
If it's an inaccurate translation like niv then yeah a bad context can be detrimental
Quit worshiping the Bible! The Spirit can show you salvation with any relevant Bible.
We worship the God of the KJV Bible.
I wouldn't give you 2¢ for The Christ of any modern "Bible
@@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep, There is Nothing wrong with the Amplified Bible. ,
@@johnpearce3714 Ya might want to compare
1 John 3:9 in the amplified spin.
"No one who is born of God (deliberately, knowingly, and habitually) practices sin"
1 John 3:9 KJV
Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
So, you honestly don't see any difference there?
Do you want a Jesus that keeps you from "committing rape", for example, or from "habitually practicing rape"?
Do You want your friends to have the Jesus of the KJV that keeps them from EVER committing adultery with YOUR wife....
Or the jesus of the amplified, that keeps them from (knowingly willingly habitually practicing) committing adultery with YOUR wife?
How about a Jesus of the KJV, that keeps men from ever committing murder,...or
The jesus of the amplified, that keeps men from (knowingly, willingly, habitually, practicing the SIN of murdering YOUR closest family & friends.
God is perfect, which means his word is perfect. His words have made it to humans, and we have written them down. If his words are perfect, there will be a perfect bible. KJV is currently closest to God's perfect word. There is a multitude of comparison examples that show the modern bibles to have blasphemy and heresy. Satan literally created a "New" KJV that is not a direct translation and tries to steer people away from true salvation. Your salvation IS your translation! Look up, Pastor Gene Kim, and thank me later. ❤
I don’t think the King James Bible is corrupted, though he was displeased reading the notes of the Geneva Bible. He authorized a translation of the holy Bible from the original tongues and he compared former translations along with the 1560 Geneva version
I was amazed at the Geneva bible being the first study bible. It wasn't until 1901, I think, when Schofield did a study bible. I need to rewatch the video where I saw this.
The king James did not like the Geneva calling out tyrants are not of God.
Schofield bibles were a vessel for Satan.
Geneva also has original texts unlike the freemason king James who changed the word of God and moving the scriptures around using numbers.... SATANIC.
The KJV and Geneva translations are the best English translated bibles in existence. The Alexandrian manuscripts, however, are corrupted.
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics, not even Geneva: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World. God's hand was on the KJV, no doubt.
How are the Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted? Sweeping statement with no evidence. The usual lies of the KJV only cult.
Can you prove that statement?
bingo.
@@TexasHoosier3118the siniaticus claims to be over 1000 years old but as one noted scholar remarked- its appearance looked too pristine. There are many references in older church father wtitings which show the Textus Receptus version includes many if not all of the omitted passages in Akexandrian and Siniaticus. Ergo Alexandrian texts have been proven to be corrupted
The devil sure hates the KJV. But thanks to God, His Word is preserved.
Amen!!!!!!
1560 Geneva Bible solos 🥱😂
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.
😂🤦🏽🤦♀️
@@JudeOne3Four The KJV Bible lets us know that your response is rude and of the devil.
So long story short, the Geneva Bible help you out in understanding the Scriptures which went against king James agenda so they rejected the Geneva Bible, and translated the king James, the way that they thought it should be translated based on their agenda in their thoughts and opinions
compare the two bible
You're trying to sell the people the other one because it's from the Catholic Virgin and not the two testament that God wants us to read The Catholic there's no such thing as Portuguese and drunk like that trust the King James it's the only Bible that God wants us to have for now he authorized it and that's good bless you in Jesus name Amen 🙏💖🙏
It's changed to fit modern English. Compare the two. It wasn't changed as is claimed.
In my last video I show that the King James ruins the prophecy of Daniel chapter 8 because verse 26 has evening and morning in the definite article in the Hebrew and it's also singular. And it's the same in the King James. But this creates a problem because where was the prophecy of the single evening and the single morning and the entire chapter?
The Geneva Bible actually gets it much closer
The preface of the translator's are missing in many kjv bibles. They admitted that its not the perfect version. They lauded other previous translations.
One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
Exactly the KJV translators would not be KJV only. They would not have been deceived by the KJV idolatry.
Really? Who told you that they admitted it is flawed? I'd run from that blind guide!
@@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep the translators admitted its not perfect,and they accepted other translations .
@@frederickanderson1860
So, when did they admit this to you directly?
Or are you going on hearsay, propaganda?
I fell in love with Jesus reading the KJV
Your experience must be universal 😅😅😅😅
Depends on which manuscript you are looking at. If your Bible goes back to Alexandria you have a corrupt Bible. The KJV stands alone as one that goes back to Antioch
That’s what I’m gathering and what God is exposing to me based on .prayer for truth etc. in deep research.
This channel should be renamed Wescott , Hort and Metzger Garbage Hour
The devil always attacks the truth through his puppets on a string.
In my 41 years, 'interpretation' and 'convenience' are some of the most terrifying words in the English language.
e-sword has 1611kjv and 1587geneva combine with regular kjv+ with strongs dictionary... that is what i like, and throw in the ESV to for a laugh.. e-sword also has the Geneva notes in the commentary section, it is possible to use the KJV and have the Geneva notes with it.
Kjv+ on e-sword has the Greek koine. Very good ❤
If you read the preface to the 1611 KJV the translators themselves said the KJV was not perfect.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism.
I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin,
but not the Greek so out it goes.
Good will towards men
Doxology in Matthew
Without cause
God manifest in the flesh
Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin,
so out they go
The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek
and Latin so out they go.
Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8
some throw out.
If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem,
what would you see as a problem?
I’ve got both versions. The best marginal notes in a Bible in my opinion would be the appendixes in E W Bullinger companion Bible
I have the E W Bullinger companion Bible too. :)
@@nobux717Bullinger was a brilliant scholar. His lexicon is a treasure. That he produced so many aids to finding what terms meant in the time they were written without the aid of a computer is impressive.
Why are 4 different words mistranslated into hell?
Then what Bible should we use for our modern day if not the KJV there’s so many translations out there nowadays it’s hard to know which is best 😢
Faith in God will do it ❤
Go to the Catholic books store and get yourself the "Douay-Rhems" bible, because it has a 73 books in it or the" Geneva" bible or the "Tyndale" or Standard bible.
A subtle way to say, "I hate the KJV" is to say "I'm not KJV only".
What do YOU (anti KJV only) folks in the KJV only, that convicts you?
@@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep the fact that the niv removed over 60,000+ words is not a good sign in itself, if you had a document that possibly would weigh the chance of your eternal soul, wouldn't you want the most of the message available? I would
@@Meowwolfwarrior
Your question "seems" sincere.
I'm 45 years since rebirth.
24 years since baptized in the Holy Spirit, & gifted with discerning of spirits (1 Cor. 12:10 KJV)
For me, frankly it's a slam dunk.
EVERY time ANYONE quotes ANYTHING that's "supposed to be" on behalf of God's SPIRIT ...But isn't.....
Men like myself with this gift.. KNOW IT.
"GOD IS SPIRIT" We discern spirits. It's a perfect gift, in we imperfect men
Are you aware the KJV is the only bible permitted in America till 1971. I am because I was 12 at the time.
Are you are the KJV in the only bible that men don't claim to have inspired of themselves ...evidenced by THEIR copyright claims,!?
My advice to all male sincere seekers...
BYPASS ALL videos, all podcasts, all sermons, all teachings, all pulpits, all alleged prophets, all theological experts, all textual critics, all denominational dogma .
And go to God The Father DIRECTLY, through "the curtain that was wrent from top to bottom" ....
The curtain which sppatated all men from mertingsuth The Holy One directly ...
the curtain ,(division) that only the high pries, once a yeart could enter to meet God directly.
until Christ made the way for US ALL...
Ask Him DIRECTLY, if the KJV really is inspired by him!
God says if YOU seek Him you WILL find Him, WHEN...WHEN YOU (personally seek Him with your WHOLE heart"
Lies that have been told to imprison people.
Perhaps the kjv does have some problems but the modern texts which didnt even exist until they were made definitely have more problems than the kjv.
One thing that has always stood out to me is how could a man of God ever put his name first on Gods Holy Bible? Think on that Kjv only peeps. Its King Jesus Bible!
Maybe he was a man used by GOD. Peep.
Ecclesiastes 8:4 Where the word of a king is, there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou? Peep 🙂
Absolutely......but no more than say those arrogant Swiss, naming a bible after one of their cantons ! 🤔😉
That's silly. It's only a means of identifying which translation you are reading. Next?
Actual king James never called it king James bible that came many many years later. Traditionally its been called the authorized version
king James is in hell?
Revelation 22:18-19
I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book
But check into Brandon Peterson's work, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.
@@private-nobody6667 I've seen his work. Honestly you can find patterns with numbers in anything if you look and try hard enough.
@@janseendiguiseppiThomasMC
Nope, that's a conclusory statement without evidence in support; you have to prove that.
You said you had seen Brandon's work, did you see all of it with understanding?
i did many years of research with Greek and Hebrew numerics, and only KJV has discernable patterns; NONE of the other versions do, not even NKJV.
And Brandon, through the insights given to him, was able to show for this generation God's seal of approval of the true Word of God in English, and not the word of Satan attempting to diminish the effectiveness of God's ordained word of truth and He did it with English this time.
Under the Rules of evidence, a conclusory statement without supporting evidence is no evidence at all. Can you cite any works that have those patterns in Hebrew, Greek, and English languages like the KJV has with overwhelming proof that is undisputed? Proof matters, not opinions. Peace be with you ...
I agree with you!
Good work. Thank you very much for this valuable presentation.
tell me more...my ears are itching...
Im curious why Mat 28:19 wasn't mentioned as being added and not inspired by God
Matthew 28:19 is not missing in any of the early manuscripts that have an ending for Matthew. It is supposed to be there.
Lots of bickering among Protestants about Bible versions. St. Jerome completed the Latin Vulgate translation from original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek texts in the late 4th century. Yet it is nearly 1200 years later all these other versions have been tinkered with for political reasons. St. Jerome is the definitive source closest to the original texts. Time to bring back Latin as a required language for all students to learn.
It's not even the best. The Papist Church has greatly edited the Vulgate many times since then
That's the funniest thing I've heard on Al Gore's internet today.
Truly this contested subject should have ended long, long ago. Instead the debate endures when the answer to it was declared long, long ago. Think about it !! In just about all of our ecclesiastical doctrinal statement's - ( Church manual's ) - the concept of inerrancy of the "Scripture" is addressed. This statement is declared something to this effect. " We believe the original "manuscripts" were inerrant in their conception." The corresponding action to this in our time presents itself as no less a task.
This is not to say perverted or corrupted translation's do not exist, and such a mind set in this hour seems popular and tempting as marketing exists today. Yet, thankfully "God" has declared that "HIS" Word" will forever be preserved eternally. So it is my contention that the mature among the "Body of Christ" be accountable here. We have been given a sound mind and mouth to counsel concerning this. It is us that has been charged with the responsibility of discipleship. Experience and reasoning with one another will go along way in settling this "hodge-podge" issue, remember a contentious spirit remains where it is at. With "God'' maintaining "HIS" Word, and with a rating of around 98 percent agreement between the "Text's," we should have be less saber rattling and truly be more grateful for what we have. We are so blessed as many of our believing family member's around the world are fortunate to own 1 page of "Holy Writing." We must never forget this "spirit-realm- reality. "Grace is "Gods ability and willingness to do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. Therefore grace never leaves us where it found us."
Do you speak Hebrew and Koine Greek? Do you not think Lancelot Andrews and the other scholars didn’t know these and other languages? May The Lord open your eyes sir! Bill. Uk
Great work!!! This matters!!!
hahaha, the footnotes were threats to monarchy
"CORRUPT" is a very broad accusation. Is there a text which contradicts Christ's teachings?
Thank you!!!
How do you know a unicorn type animal didn’t exist?
The Indian rhinoceros, also known as the greater one-horned rhinoceros
@@brock2443 yet again according to who’s interpretation and which manuscript? The TR or the Alexandrain text?
Very informative. A lot of stress on the Alexandrian family, which is the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus: which of course was preserved by the Popes. Maybe that says enough about that. It does not appear that any translation is perfect but KJV does have advantages over many modern translations. The Geneva 1560 is a even better one in my opinion.
Hello! What do you think about the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible? do you have experience with it? if so what version would you say is the best, 1560 or 1599?
Thanks!
Jamie.
yeah, we already know you are a bigotted anti-catholic
Yes, and the Alexandrian family, so few and dubious as it is is quite leavened. Thee KJV has the HS in the very text, study it and see for self. Look at Isaiah 53:8 compare KJV to several other modern versions note contradictory translations. Look up too FROM & PRISON note how Hebrew words here have been translated elsewhere in OT as THROUGH & OPPRESSION; and what does taken from judgment mean- look up Acts 8:33 KJV here compare leavened versions here too. Consider Proverbs 25:2 here carefully, what does He glory in doing?
@@Obediah002Since when was the KJV the standard? Where is the scripture that supports the KJV only teaching? Why would any honest Bible student compare modern translations to the KJV? Would that not be falling for the double standards and lies of the KJV only cult?
"Preserved"??? More hidden and rewritten.
If that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus was the "preserved" Word of God:
Why don't they agree with each other? One would think if both came from Alexandria (which was gnostic in the region), they wouldn't have all those errors and some see that is was tried to be copied over. Even scholars have no idea the possible origin of the Codex Vaticanus.
Why did God allow it to be hidden for so long? That is saying God has mislead Christians for over 1000 years.
As far as the one I have been ability to study with the Holy Spirit's leading, KJV by far.
Integrity syndicate ? - In the 15th Century the Geneva format was still in the throws of establishing top left and right english in order to properly navigate the Saintly Clause secret of the " I AM that ( which ) i am ". In the beginning was the verbatim of God, but up through the line of David to the Aaronic Levitical Tribe, the Christ wouldn't take the lower case " t " for the supplication of Simon to preserve the homonym clause until he wed Lady Wisdom at age 33. Martin Luther was the Catalyst for the deaf, dumb, and blind and those fully facilitated with all their senses. But the miracle of prophecy came from the deaf, dumb, and blind cathartic to statues, stained glass, crucifix, and Rosary props that the priests passed the plate and missed the grail on as far as understanding spiritual and physical things and how object should not take precedence over Holy predicated subject. In other words, we can't sell material things to attract a congregation for money, to save our soul...we have to take up our cross, and sell Jesus in ourselves. The name of the Lord is a strong tower:....................................................
Helpful talk very
informative,and
a good share!
That said many of us
find the language
effective for
memorising
bible verses.
That and the devotion and
reverence of the
Hampton court
scholars,still
makes it
popular
for
readers
today!
Footnotes are not inspired
I have this version of the bible Thank you for making this where can i get the true and accurate versions of the bible and what are their names
BestEnglishTranslations.com - Identifying the Best English Translations of the Bible. Much Love!
I am a Bible translator and recommend the NKJV, which translation is quite faithful as translations go. The NIV is easier to read but adds 15% of interpretation, which any Christian should find objectionable. The cost of smoothing out a rendering in any language is right theology.
One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
@@IntegritySyndicate - Here is The Savior
YaH The Heavenly FATHER (Genesis 1) HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Semitic:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
@@TheBinaryWolfNIV taking away a lot of verses in the bible
All translations have shortcomings. For instance, in Mt.16:18, all translators mistranslate the preposition, epi, as "on," when it is in the dative case and should be rendered as "with." The same construct (dative/indirect object) appears in Mt. 18:26, where it is correctly translated as "with."
We have so many Bible teachers today, but few scholars; and, as Paul exhorted the Corinthians, we even fewer "fathers," meaning few that effectively evangelize.
You're saying that every biblical Greek scholar is dumber than a first year student. What is the _real_ reason they translated it that way? It has to be something other than being unable to see a dative case
@@muskyoxes Your skepticism is quite understandable. But such anomalies are not rare, according to Professor Maurice Robinsin, editor of the Brown-Briggs-Driver Hebrew Lexicon, a professor of mine that pointed out no less than 15% of errors in the NIV.
"Put not your faith in men," says God in Holy Writ. So I encourage you to invest in an interlinear Greek-English NT. The literal translation by Dr. Alfred Marshall is one of the better publications. In it, the literal translation of the original text appears in English. And if you have enough intellectual curiosity, you will add the Analytical Greek New Testament by Friberg and Friberg, wherein the grammatical construct of each term in the Bible is identified. Thus, you can bypass much of the filtering, rather than depend on well-meaning but so oft bias of fallible men. Translations vary, but not the NT Greek text books, which ALL teach that the dative case (indirect object of the verb) is never translated as "on."
I think because epi appears in the genitive case almost always that translators over looked the dative. Perhaps they got it right in Mt.18:26 is because the preposition is contracted, which caught their eye. I myself had been guilty of the same error...until I was teaching a class on Greek prepositions and chanced upon Mt.16:18. If you truly wish to know the truth, you will research the matter further, without which a cloud of doubt will always remain. If I can be of any help, I will do my best for you.
@@TheBinaryWolf I didn't barge in here because i know anything, but because your comment sounded to me like "the entire community flunked a first year grammar question", which is a very different claim than "people make mistakes".
After vague searching, this does not seem like a basic issue. I can see reams of definitions for ἐπὶ linked from an online interlinear, even just in their dative section. And i see a suggestion that case distinctions for ἐπὶ started getting blurred after the classical period. And i see "ἐπὶ + dative => 'locative' dative => point in space or time at which the predication is offered" which doesn't sound like either "on" or "with" to me.
@@muskyoxes Until you are fluent in an inflected language, the issue at hand will remain a mystery to you.
It is no accident that God chose Greek to convey His truth to all other languages. It is by far the most expressive, with a unique perfect and aorist tense, middle voice snd syntax that communicstes as much meaning and the words. Those who are ignorant of the latter are destined to mistranslate the repographs, evidenced by so many lame "translations."
As I mentioned, the dative epi in Mt.16:18 should be rendered as it is in the identical construct of Mt.18:26.
But I think the bridge between us is too great; for I am persuaded that even if the apostle Matthew appeared to you with the same exposition, you would still hold on to the dative as a genitive.
@@TheBinaryWolf You don't seem to know there's a gigantic difference between "the entire expert community is wrong" and "the entire expert community is trivially wrong"
Your spreading discourse among the brethren
As Satan speaks.
I use the Orthodox study Bible. I have the KJV but lot of books were taken out. The OSB has all the books.
People with dogmas have crazy arguments. I've heard before someone defend the use of the word "Easter" in Acts 12. The defense was something like "The KJV translators were learned men, they knew that Passover has already passed, hence why they translated it as Easter instead".
@@MichaelTheophilus906 Geneva says Passover. Tyndale Bible,
Coverdale Bible, Matthew's Bible, Great Bible, Easter, Wycliffe Pask.
@@MichaelTheophilus906 not sure. But its a dogmatic statement by KJVonlyists.
Actually easter is disguise for the ancient goddess worship of ISHTAR. eggs at Easter arr representative of fertility as those who worshiped idols like fertility gods....the devil perverts God's holidays, his word his everything.
HALLOWEEN is evil ND should. Not be celebrated by children especially nor adults. Christmas is focus on money and material goods which was worship of nimrod and just tlike they offer gits to him on or under. Tree , so did many sacrifice their children to idols and "gods"....think about it!!!!!! ND IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED usually August, Sept October leading up to Halloween (devils nigh) there's usually a world wide troubling thing like murder...one year it's chris watts another it's Bryan laundry ...there is some satanic stuff leading up to Halloween...note the patterns of these things and easy to see the evil. But we must be simple concerning evil being wise in Good and God and truth. But we are to be wise of the enemy's tactics with all discernment and prayers 🙏
Easter was a separate pagan holiday celebrated in the Roman Empire during the time. Painting eggs in the blood of child sacrifice for their fertility goddess, doing other pagan rituals. This holiday is rooted back to the Babylonian Ishtar.
Note that this is a pagan feast.
Jesus' crucifiction was on Passover.
John 19:13-14 (KJV) When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha.
And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King!
Note that this is a Jewish feast.
Acts 12 talks about Herod the Roman backed king persecuting Peter. Herod's plan was to bring forth Peter to the people after the pagan Roman holiday of Easter, not the Jewish Passover.
The Catholic Church just rebranded Easter as a 'Christian' thing when it is actually not. To this very day, the Catholics' Easter do not coincide with the Jewish Passover. These are two separate days being observed.
That's just from the difference between Passover and Easter perspective.
Next, timeframe.
Passover is already long gone by the time we reach Acts 12.
Acts 12:3 (KJV) And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Note Unleavened Bread.
The Feast of Unleavened Bread is being celebrated in that passage. This is:
Leviticus 23:4-6 (KJV) These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.
In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover.
And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
Passover, and THEN 7 days of Unleavened Bread.
If Herod was waiting to bring forth Peter after Passover, it looks like he could have done it right away. It's already Unleavened Bread.
Unless.. there is an entirely different feast celebrated by non-Jews and non-Christians unrelated to Passover that is close enough that happened during or after the Unleavened Bread.
Oh look what we have here. Turns out there is this thing called Easter that the pagans in ancient Rome celebrated within that exact timeframe. I hope that our pagan backed Roman puppet king doesn't celebrate it.
Problem is Passover and Days of Unleavened Bread are used interchangeably. I believe Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread. This is the type of familiar or casual language we use today. For instance, when its December 20 or December 27, people typically say its Christmas, even though Christmas are technically on the 25th. If Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread, then Luke can use similar language as well. Passover and Unleavened Bread are the same feast. Passover can mean the days of Unleavened Bread. Also, technically speaking, the 14th is the preparation of the passover. The passover technically starts on the 15th and continues for 7 days. That's why the 14th are called the preparation of the passover. There's a parallel between the "unblemished" lamb and the "Unleavened bread". It represents the same thing. Hence Passover and Unleavened Bread are interchangeably.
Lastly, the author literally says Passover, not Easter. So if you are arguing that the KJV is correct, then you are mistaken, with all sincerity.
I do not believe the KJV nor the Geneva Bible are corrupt. Both camps who favor one or the other make these accusations. I realize that the KJV was mandated by James for political reasons because he hated the Geneva Bible because of its commentary notes. Both of them are from the TR and somewhat similar, so accusing both translations as being corrupt is ridiculous.
The king James bible and Geneva bible is not just corrupt but also misleading,as a matter of fact the original scriptures were just that scriptures not Latin biblica.These bibles are loaded with pagan words and they do not contain the true Aramaic- Hebrew names of the father and son, but instead is replaced with pagan name jesus-hail zeus, pagan titles Lord-baal and God-Lucifer,history is there for all and you can google some of what I have typed here for yourself,these biblias- Latin were written for Christians Catholics but humanity due to lack of studying the word sctiptures or searching for truth majority followed after Constantine's made up Christian religion and study's from those biblias Latin, instead of the original Aramaic Hebrew version which contains the original writings of the quodeshims (holy ones).This is why only a remnant will be saved, because it only a remnant that will know the truth and be set free from that truth.
The KJV and Geneva translations are the best English translated bibles in existence. The Alexandrian manuscripts, however, are corrupted.
@@PETERJOHN101 Nothing personal brother. I respectfully disagree. The Alexandrian manuscripts being corrupt is old accusations by King James or TR onlyists. There is no proof to back those accusations up not when they agree with the TR and Majority Text 94 to 98.5 percent of the time. And where there are textual variants between all three, it changes no doctrine at all.
@@rodneyjackson6181
I have discussed the issue with bible translators and looked carefully at the evidence. The Majority Text agrees better with early Church writings. The Coptic derived Alexandrian codices, once believed to be older, are in fact of a later origin. The Byzantine manuscript also appears to be free of Gnostic influences common to early Egyptian culture.
@@PETERJOHN101 the King James is not from the Majority Text. Its from the Received Text. The Majority and Received Texts are different. There are in fact about 800 differences between the Received Text and the Majority Text. The KJV, NKJV and Geneva are Received Text translations. They are not Majority Text. The things you said about the Alexandrian manuscripts are not factual but King James only misinformation that has been parroted for many years that has already been debunked.
To you the video maker...now your removing comments?
Thank you so, so much. He was an occultist and freemason. He built the first Masonic Temple and also regularly kept men in his bedchamber.
King James The 6th was a freemason who was in love with men freemason
Would you be able to share your source for that?
The facsimiles of the 1611 I have all have marginal notes. The words of the church fathers were also considered which quoted older Greek texts no longer in existence. Humble men do not claim to be anything other than feeble men. History has judged, and the KJV has proven itself better than previous and subsequent versions ("Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." Matthew 7:20). The apocrypha were separated from the rest of the Old Testament unlike Catholic bibles, which had it mixed in with the Old Testament books, and were later removed completely. The Alexandrian manuscripts themselves were corrupt, and the Bible itself has nothing good to say about Egypt in general, and Alexandria in particular.
Easter is the correct word as it is noted that it was the days of unleavened bread, which occur after Passover, so it was already over with, and Easter was coming up.
Paul's authorship of Hebrews is confirmed by Peter in 2 Peter 3:15-16: "And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath also written unto you; (the Hebrews, that Peter is also writing to here, which all the Hebrew epistles--Hebrews through Jude are written to.) As also in all his epistles (not just that one), speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction."
The AI, or whatever is being used here, can't even pronounce Job (the name) correctly with a long "o" and not the short "o" which means employment.
Well we would do to heed the words of God in Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
Well done video!
You have to believe on what he did on the cross and that is how did he die? He shed his blood for forgiveness of sin. Believe and receive And you are sealed to the day of redemption Ephesians 4:30 kjv.
Good presentation, pity its in a computer voice
This video is designed to cast doubt on the KJV - its tone is trying to appropiate a sense of objective reason when in fact its claims are deceptions and have been roundly been addressed by the most recent studies
Examples
Here's a good documentary about the Authorized Version, or the King James Bible:
ruclips.net/video/KHcf3E8qOqA/видео.htmlfeature=shared
What about the supposed "errors"?
ruclips.net/video/92Fn071t4ds/видео.html
John 8:32
and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
I'm assuming this video comes from an anti-trinitarian source, right?
I am an absolute Trinitarian and am somewhat aggrieved to discover that 1 John 5:7,8 is an imposter!!
However I am nonetheless assured of Yahweh’s Trinity on the basis of plentiful scriptures which do affirm this fact, without the need for 1 John 5:7,8.
I have always had my doubts as to whether God would have used a man with such obvious sexual proclivities to exult His Word.
Perhaps now, after 41 years, I can finally start reading a reliable Bible.
He is not king james😢
You can use a British accent because it's been proven Americans feel it has authority, but this will still be VERY incorrect. Even older bibles use all these terms and scriptures this guy says the KJV "added". Bounce the KJV off the Geneva and 1500 versions you'll find it's very very close. Just some stuff changed because it didn't suit the king and catholics
Time to get the truth out! Great job, keep these coming!
KJV is my ongoing version I trust after been using NIV for years. We need to do our research further so we can find out the big difference in the text between every Versions. Been using NIV for years and find out later that many of the verses which is in KJV are totally erased in the NIV bible.
Oftentimes , the latest version is the most corrupt..
Business-minded individuals have crept in to manipulate translations to suit the taste of the public-you better study all versions to have a wider view of what is going on...
Why did the KJV add all those verses that are not supposed to be there?
@@TexasHoosier3118like which verses
Wasn't king james a gay tyrant....
Why would his book be followed
Would a gay tyrant support Romans 1:16-32 KJV?
No! It's more satanic propaganda to discredit the real Bible, which exposes them for who they REALLY are.
King James was not gay. That's just one of all the lies.
No, he wasn't a homosexual, nor was he a tyrant
😢 king James was a gay who had an intimate relationship with his cousin.
@@madmaxx5612 the KJV is the best version
Although I like most of the content on this channel, and that many of the people whom are refuted against in todays society on here concerning the trinity and shedding Gods light:
I'd have to say that that there were many errors in this video concerning the 1611, especially the arasmus rumor; it's a rumor, and if you look deeply enough into that subject, and look at the documents, 1john 5:7 has always been in the greek and arasmus never forged anything. He has statements.
And arasmus refuted the rumor, and even names of the highest scholars of textual criticism have admitted this error on their part against 1john.
Experts in linguistics, and texual analysis have heavily studied 1john and have concluded that 1john makes no sense in anyway grammatically or contextually, in the greek or english with 5:7 missing based off of many things. And it was also one of the leading forces on why the creed did what they did. If it were not for that main verse, the creed wouldn't have used the pagan the argument they did, so strongly.
1john 5:7 was well in circulation in the body of Christ, revelations backs and harmonized it as well.
1stjohn is a reflection of Genesis, and the gospel of john introduction and revelation and it bears record to the entire bible. Beginning to end. And scholars have acknowledged this.
The fact that the creed argued it, is the very evidence it was there, and the fact that it was there, and the church was still oneness, and refused to believe the trinity, was even further proof that it didn't mean what the creed thought it did. The written documents between the creed reveal this very truth about the early body of Christ.
Arguing that 5:7 wasn't there to refute Trinitarianism is actually a worse argument, and a bad stance.
They even exiled the arians from the council, and persecuted them too, because of the oneness stance they took that half way agreed with the trinitarian discussion; they shared similar concept but that Jesus with God preincarnate physically from the beginning or similar rather....So what does this tell you...that the verse was there..
The argument wasn't for no reason...
It was one of the strongest reasoning for their convoluted minds.
In otherwords, to believe otherwise is simply intellectual suicide.
Because what are you arguing, if it wasn't there, and what are you arguing for them if they didn't think it was there? What are you arguing against them if it wasn't their?
So what is the witness of men?
And why is the witness of God greater?
There were other errors I've found with this video, about the 1611 as well, that try to point to "sinister conspiracy" that piggyback from what I've said, because of the emphasis on 1john 5:7,
And as well as just not considering mans fallible ways.
No translation can be perfect, but I do think the 1611 is going to be the closest in as few errors as possible regarding execution, compared to any other translations, and so i believe in started where we have the most accurate grounds to then look up specific meanings of words. If not, try to look up something in an NIV in the same verse as a 1611 and let me know if you get the same meaning for the intended word given in translation; use a different word or less accurate word and you get a different meaning in the original language; because it's not accurate.
Infact I dont just think, but i KNOW, that if people are putting that much faith in man, that they are not even ever checking the Greek or Hebrew, you are doing yourself a disservice to the honesty of the original languages to begin with and God's WORD.
It is textually impossible to have a perfect translational interpretation and literal meaning in a sound way at the same time;
You have to choose one: or the other. The bibles we have, are not meant for literal accuracy, they are meant to convey accurate interpretation...
Tell me how many verses make sense to you when you read from a youngs literal translation.........
Studying is different than reading.
You cannot read any single english bible, and expect literal accuracy, so if you need to understand doctrinal specifics, you HAVE TO look up original language for literal meaning.
The bibles we have were meant to convey in spirit of the writing in HOPEFULLY the most sound way possible.
There are too many language rules we would break if we wanted what we keep arguing the sake of, and believe me, we don't really want that...
We would not understand a thing.
Stop putting faith in man, and put your faith in our oneness Father, and His son Jesus Christ, and just study.
I was saved by the WORD, but if I toss out my bible I'm still saved.
No man is perfect but Jesus Christ.
Stop trying to make man perfect.
I believe as according to even the prefacial dedicatory statements, by the translators to you in the 1611, that they did their best. That's all they claimed to do, and I appreciate their humbleness for admitting that.
If you want God's true understanding, you need to labor for it; and you are expected to.
I believe the 1611 had the best intention, and conveyed with the best intent in spirit of laboring for translation in light of balance between literal and interpretational honesty in a way that the gentiles would best grasp understanding:
Because when I read anything else, it's "just not there" : pronouns, punctuation, attitude, grammar, expression, etc.
Don't believe me; try mathew 5 on divorce in 1611, and tell me the difference in what you see in every other translation, from NASB to NIV.
On what the real issue of divorce was and what the Jews of their time were doing, and pay sharp attention to dissect those 2 verse in 1611.
Thats just one example...
Screw the spelling. I want the heart of the intent...
I believe their will never be another translation like the 1611 ever again, especially with how lost the english language has become, and the worse it is getting. If you don't think language can be so far removed, ask yourself how many translation will start to pump out according to keeping up with words in english like "mewing", and "looksmaxing" and how badly they will have to alter the original languages to facilitate translation and interpretation to that...
There is such a thing as too far:
And it's already bad enough.
But at the end of the day, we have to pick a translation, and shit, or get off the pot....
The 1611 sheds light on many things that no other translation does in many ways, as apposed to others.
If you look at every man, with the same faith you need to put in jesus, you will always think they're conspiring against you.
We live by the spirit of the law of love and liberty, for a reason. We live by spiritual understanding, spiritual expression of the law, if we so choose, but
Had Jesus not come, I think we'd be in big trouble relying on any textual integrity of english, from Hebrew and Greek, to convey even the Law of the commandments, contained in ordinances, let me tell you...
We need to know what is spiritually doctrinally important for today, because like the Law, that's our spiritual equivalent in such cases, that marks salvific difference, unfortunately with these new translations.
We should focus on what is exceptionally scholarly, and warn people about what is truly the garbage of today; If we demonize the 1611 in light of everything I've said, what will we push future believers to read from? What are they reading from now??...Would you rather them read a 1611 or an NET, NLT, NIV, NRSV, or a McArthur lordship reference bible??
We have to find a common ground and fight for something: We are all believers in the body of Christ and are more equipped spiritually than I fear the newer believers ever will have a chance to be, unfortunately, and we have to steer the younger and spiritually naive generation of believers in a direction; what direction is that going to be??
Go for the majority in accurate conveyance, keep faith in Jesus, and look up the text if the Spirit of the Father wants you to.
No translation is as faithful as Jesus Christ; but know when a translation is absolutely conspiring against Jesus, and not yourself.
Amen, Be Blessed, be well.
infact the whole purpose of the 1611 Bible was made for layman people, the common person, to have God's word and be understood in a common manner. It was not created for the scholarly and academics. They are two different things, two different types of people, two different purposes, and the common man cannot dedicate his layman life to living for God's word in the same way, and as academically as a scholar.
This refutes the very purpose of the 1611,and what it stood for, and if you don't believe that, then why did even this video record the very errors of even the scholarly...
This is what I mean.
It is okay, for the common man to be the common man and common woman, and let teachers be academic.
We should all teach interpretation to one another in good spirit, and sound spiritual understanding, we need scholars, and they're held to a higher degree by the Father.
God doesn't expect the same of us.
We will have rewards for different things down here. God wants to use us differently, but I do think that we should also use our God given discernment with the best of our God given abilities to have this understanding about things, and to put our best foot forthright.
We easily scoff at scholars, but who's really put out a better translation than the 1611 since it's inception?
Nitpicking a word or phrase is not even merely scratching the surface, in entailing what is required in and of, the translational profession.
These people a have to be capable of linguistic marksmanship, and genius level of understanding, not only in language, in multicultural understanding, but grammar, punctuation, and everything that belongs to specific said language, heritage, interpretation, conveyance, rules of said language vs our very own language concerning structure, and Ordinances. And they need to know how to conjunctualize, and deliver it. Maybe it was done with their English culture in mind, but it's definitely to be much more respected than the culture that we currently live in. They had a level of proficiency that not one scholar consistently has to this day.
Infact: what scholar do we know today, that has any extreme level of excellence in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic today, letalone all 3 beyond, paper, and a couple early college courses, and that can even properly hold a culturally decent verbal conversation with anybody in those languages even at a street level, today; that are even still studying?
And why haven't we come out with anything better than the 1611?
Nobody today is capable; that is why.
Do we read 5 different translations with our kids, and set down the 1611?
The further out we move with our watered down and deterioration of an English language, the further away we get from understanding these ancient languages. Look where we are from the 1611.
Look where those scholars were when they made it accessible for mankind in English.
Both of our cultural differences may have their gripes, but I think the way they interpreted the scriptures was definitely reflective of something to show for importance of something we are lacking today, at the very least.
Something we lack that is incapable of reproduction. Some things are gone for good.
King James didn't want reference notes; I agree that it has done nothing but impede the reader and confuse our spirit, and sway believers on personal bias of the note makers.
How many reference and study bibles today are completely denominationally and reformationally filled with junk and lies.
There's a serious lack of appreciation,
we're an ungrateful generation;
We have nothing but trash translations today, and the 1611 was put out to a generation that had basically none, and was able to produce what they did.
The Geneva was not perfect either and in also many more worse ways than the 1611, with or without it's references. We can study what exactly was wrong with that Bible, too.
It was beyond a King-Conspiracy.
We can say what we want about their generation and their culture and religious actions, but is not an excuse to exile the 1611, they were the closest thing to a generation the was biologically conservative to boot.
Would we today, expect them to read from an NIV from a generation that can't even tell what a man is or what a woman is, when they read the horrors that are of that translation compared to what they put out for us?
They put that 1611 out for us....
We aught to think good before we accuse their culture as anxious to read from anything else.
What would they think about our laws?
Infact; If we hung tight to their very translation the way they'd hoped people would have appreciated, I think our society would even be in better shape.
The KJV has saved more souls than any other translation. I use the KJV but I also have another Bible I use which is a side-by-side Bible that has the NIV and the amplified bible all in one book. God will not allow His Word to be corrupt and the translations which are corrupted are the 'paraphrase' translation bibles which are incredibly obvious and blasphemous. The Catholic church hates the KJV so I go with that. But just like The Lord used a donkey to speak, He can use any translation to convey His message to us. The important thing is to believe in Jesaus, that he died and rose again for our sins, and so far these other translations do not contradict that but when in doubt, I always have my KJV handy, at arms length. They killed William Tyndale for translating the Bible, and killed thousands of Christians throughout the centuries. How can anybody with half a brain not see that the Catholic church is of the devil??? They can never get rid of the KJV.
Alienated from biblical clarity 😂😂😂😂😂😂 not interested in higher criticism only a Bible denying modernist would be ok with that
The king James is the last to include John 5:9 correctly. I reject any bible that gets that wrong. I'm open to earlier TR versions as well. John Burgon debunked modern objections to TR and is ignored by so as not to be considered by the the unwary. Search the scriptures, choose life.
No, its not, Gods Word does not return void
A last days attack.
Such an old argument....what does it matter....all religion is used for three purposes...
1. maintain control over the minds and actions of the people.
2. Maintain the income of those in power.
3. Maintain total power over the population.
The KJV is better than the niv ! The Geneva Bible is much better than the KJV
You are saved by grace though faith in Jesus shed blood on the cross like it says in the kjv in Roman's 3:25 Faith in his Blood and 1 Corinthians 15:vs 1 thru 4 The Gospel how that Jesus died according to the scriptures and He was buried and rose again according to the scriptures and believe this from the heart like it says in the KJV. And also Jesus said I am the way the truth and the life no one comes to the Father but by me like itsays in the KJV it's the only one I read. The other perversions are corrupted
Get some books from A.V. Publications and receive the correction I received 18 years ago.
This entire thumbnail title is foolishness
If you take the KJV and compare the verses in other bibles yourself, I believe you will agree with the KJV. I did just that and find the other bibles, especially that use the “Critical text” try to eliminate the “blood of Christ”, Christ’s deity, and many other things. It is not that hard to compare with the tools available.
Most of us believe that the KJV is the Presrved Word of God for English speaking people. Only Ruckmanites believe in double inspiration
Another option laced nothing. The KJV 1611 or hit the road. Nothing to see here.
KJV is the jewel in the crown
Try this with any other Bible:
Words of God in Genesis 1
KJB = 343 = 7x7x7
KJB1611 = 344 (Standardized 1762)
NKJV = 336
ESV = 333
NASB20 = 326
NIV = 321
Words of God in Matthew 1
KJB = 49 = 7×7
KJB1611 = 49 = 7×7
NKJV = 50
ESV = 46
NASB20 = 50
NIV = 51
Amen (Entire Bible)
KJB = 77
KJB1611 = 77
NKJV = 77
ESV = 56
NASB20 = 57
NIV = 57
In + Amen (GEN/REV)
KJB = 777
KJB1611 = 782
NKJV = 758
ESV = 719
NASB20 = 707
NIV = 676
In + earth + The + Amen (Entire Bible) (earth & Amen = case-sensitive)
KJB = 77,777
KJB1611 = 77,745 (Standardized 1700’s?)
“Verily I say unto…” (Entire Bible)
KJB = 77
KJB1611 = 77
NKJV = 76 (“Assuredly, I say to you…”)
ESV = 72 (“Truly, I say to you…”)
NASB20 = 75 (“Truly I say to you…”)
NIV = 79 (“Truly I tell you…”)
Father + Son (Entire Bible) {PURE; Father = God, Son = Jesus}
KJB = 490 = 70×7
Jesus* (Entire Bible) {PURE; Jesus = Christ the Lord}
KJB = 77th with 7th Christ, 70x7th in John 10:30-36, 777th with 77th Holy Ghost
LORD + GOD + JEHOVAH + I AM + JAH + BRANCH + KING + Jesus* (Entire Bible) {PURE; Jesus = Christ the Lord}
KJB = 7777x
Jesus* + Christ (Entire Bible) {PURE; Jesus Christ}
KJB = 1554 = 777+777
KJB1611 = 1554 = 777+777
NKJV = 1551
ESV = 1504
NASB20 = 1522
NIV = 1782
....and so much more.
This didn't happen accidentally.
Purified 7 times:
1.Tyndale Bible
2.Coverdale Bible
3.Matthew's Bible
4.Great Bible
5.Geneva Bible
6.Bishop's Bible
7.King James Bible
I don't judge, nor do I hate, people who read other Bible versions. You can read which ever book you want to read. I don't even argue about it. In fact my friends and family all read their own preferred Bible versions and that's okay.
But I do take my own christianity and salvation very serious. I am a Word of God Onlyist. Therefore I only read the King James Version.
I personally choose the KJV because I am a Word of God Onlyist and the King James Version is the pure, true word of God in English. I only choose God's word. Not man's word. The other versions are merely men and publishing companies trying to interpret in their own words, through the scope and filters of their own opinions and beliefs and also with their own added footnotes what they think it is that God is saying.
To me, that is not good enough. I want God's words, period and I am not interested in man's opinion.
The King James Version, on the other hand, is a direct word for word translation from the Original Arimaic and Greek manuscripts. That means that it says exactly in English, word for word, what it is that God is actually saying. And it does so without man's opinion or added footnotes. That's what separates the King James Version from all the other so called "Bibles" on this earth and that is why the King James Version is the pure and perfect word of God.
I'm so sick of people out to put doubts in everybody's head, concerning God's word. The time is short, the devil is working overtime, so let's just share the simple plan of Salvation. I believe Jesus is coming back soon. Stop with this bs.
Deut 4:2 (KJV) and Rev 22:18-19 (KJV) tell us there can be only one preserved Word of God. And yet version after version is spewed out to deceive.
There is not a power that is not given by God. Through providence God raised up the most powerful nation there ever was or will be, the U.S.A., and in its infancy it was given the preserved word of God; “Robert Aitken, a Philadelphia printer, was the first to publish the first American edition of the K.J.V. New Testament in 1781 and the K.J.V. Old Testament in 1782, omitting the Apocrypha. On completion, he petitioned and received from the Congress of the Confederation, an official endorsement that Aitken added to the binding of his Bibles, to assure colonists that they were buying a non-royalist edition: “Resolved, that the United States in Congress assembled… recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States and hereby authorize him to publish this recommendation.” As a result, the Aitken Bible (KJV) is often referred to as “The Bible (KJV) of the Revolution.”
The nation was given the KJV, not the dead sea scrolls, not the book of Enoch, not Hebrew books etc. but only the KJV. If God wanted us to understand his word in Hebrew he would have raised this nation up speaking Hebrew. Back in the 1600’s God saw to it that the certain scriptures were translated into English “KJ Bible” and was put into print so that all could read for themselves the truth that in in the scriptures. God did this because he knew that he would bring about this powerful nation [U.S.A. and the English language] of ours to lead the world. The scriptures were written by apostles and prophets inspired by God through the Holy Ghost. The compilation and translation to English was also done by the direction of God through the Holy Ghost and he did not make any mistakes, i.e., the fourth horse being “pale” was no mistake, the horse is not green.
In Greek mythology, the name Chloris (Khloris Χλωρίς, from khloros χλωρός, meaning “greenish-yellow,” “pale green,” “pale,” “pallid” or “fresh”) appears…
Pallid 1. pale; faint or deficient in color; wan: a pallid countenance.
People say that they believe that scripture was written by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost, which is true. But what you people don’t seem to realize is that the compilation and translation of the bible (KJV) was also done by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost. If the bible (KJV) was written and compiled by men of opinion and perspective and translated by incompetent translators then you might as well throw it in the trash. The prophets were told what to write and how to write it, 2 Peter 1:20-21 (KJV)
The nation was given the symbol of the Eagle, 37 … Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together. Luke 17:37 (KJV), the body being the Church, the body of Christ. The nation has the motto and preamble “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”. This greatest and most powerful nation the U.S.A., has been given the last and best chance to lead the world to heaven on earth or destruction. But like all other nations of power before it (symbolic Israels, Rev 11:8 (KJV)) the U.S. has chosen destruction and is now the great “liar” saying “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”, it is now the conglomerate of the dragon, beast, false prophet, and harlot, it is Satan loosed from the pit, 7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth Rev 20:7-8 (KJV).
And yet no one seems to know of or speak of a very clear fulfillment of prophecy in our recent history. We (U.S.A.) are the ones who brought down fire from heaven in Aug. of 1945 and we are the ones that gave life to the image of the beast in May of 1948. Rev.13:13-15 (KJV).
All glory to God. Amen
Once again, God's Word comes under attack. Have you not studied the vast multitude of numerical miracles that occur only in the KJV. Pray and ask the Holy Spirit to lead you into all truth.
Wow! I am shocked by all these comments on the different versions of the Bible. How rude some people are about God. A God that is literally the very essence of LOVE. Whether one uses the Geneva Bible, the Ethiopian Bible, the KJV Bible or any other Bible, if it won the hearts of men who cares which version it is. The Bible is only supposed to lead people to God and from there the Spirit of Truth which is Jesus Christ himself will teach you what you need to know.
Remember in the Bible where it talks about how Jesus always went against the Pharacees? The ones that looked more to a book of Laws than to the Spirit of God? I ask you who were the Pharacee's? They were the church folk. And the Bible says BEWARE OF THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARACEES. In other words y'all are doing the very same thing they did. If Jesus were here im sure he would tell you to stop such ignorance and LOVE one another like he commanded us to do. That is the Bible in a nutshell..... Love God and Love your brothers and sisters as you love yourself. People we can argue over which Bible to use and at the same time miss the WHOLE MESSAGE.
SHAME ON US! Father open our eyes to see and our ears to hear what the Spirit says to us.
Misinformation at it's finest. Straight is the gate and narrow is the way. But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
ruclips.net/user/shortsBHNQGv4EvQw?si=RREsC-88ySsowbnI
Nice try. Thank God for His perfect infallible Word as in the pure Cambridge KJV . God bless.
Romans 3:4...KJB
How many people have been saved because of the KJV? That's important.
The kjv is broken but better than some and due to the strongs concordance of the kjv makes it very helpful with study. God is in control and he will get his truth to every person he chose to be first and eventually use them to bring all creation to the real truth. God will be all in all. Every knee will bow. Everyone will be of one true understanding aka God's true words. His will is all be saved and come to the truth. 1 timm 2-4
God does all his will and gets all his desire. We love God because he first loved us. We dont choose God he chooses us. Each in their own erra. God is the savior of all according to 1timm 4-10 its unfortunate he tells us this is worthy to teach yet i have found no church that does. Churches tell people he wants all to be saved but they have to choose in order for God to save them. That is absolutely not scripture. That is actually blasphemy of God's word. God is the savior of all!! All are not the savior. We are saved bye the faith of christ not our faith in Christ according to scripture yet no church agrees or teaches it. This is common truth in all translations yet most dont believe it because most don't honestly believe God. But rest knowing god is in control and he knows what he is doing and his will is done and his will is all be saved!
All other versions are corrupt not the king James
KJV itself was revised in 1769. Even though there maybe 20 different Modern versions available today, 50 percent of Bible buyers STILL purchase the KJV. If it ain't broke..........
That means 50 percent prefer a modern translation that they can understand. No need to boost ego
One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist
@@Anony584other translations are even more corrupted in its own translation adding and taking away from the word is unbelievable
@@sanalouis2620 Agreed. (Revelation 22:18-19) "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: {19} And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
@@AinitgreatAmen 🙏
thank you it a verse for everyone not to take lightly. God bless you x
Falsehood, slanted, lies, propaganda. Proverbs 13: 13 Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed.
funny to see the argument tha the KJV is based on Latin translation instead of being 'directly' from Greek - amazing ignorance and bigotry
If you don’t like the King James Bible don’t read it. It’s not as if you don’t have other translations to read.
It's easy - ALL bibles are minor historical sources.
Ask your self this --Do you have any provable, fact-based evidence of anything spiritual in the bible?
And by "evidence" I mean, NOT any hearsay, feelings, faith, beliefs, hopes, coincidences or bible stories written by man.
Lol it says 666 after the name. That def says a lot. So it's easy for people today to make accusations about something that took place 500 years ago however this is all based on pride and agendas. Know that no version of the Bible has taken this much depth into giving you the best interpretation of the Bible in all history before 1611 or since. Every page had to be agreed upon by over thirty other men that new every language they used to interpret from. Not just Hebrew and Greek. Know that the king had nothing to do with the interpretation aside from bringing the men and transcripts together. Also note the reason was because of the tyrant religion that still exists today but that back then had a strangle hold on the ignorance of the people as they did not have a Bible in thier own language that was well written. The KJV is the only version that puts words in italics so that the reader knows they put those words in to help you understand what's being said more easily. Also the KJV is the only current version not under copyright and in the KJV Bibles you will have letters from the interpreters as well as from the kind himself all stating that the reason they wrote the Bible in English, despite massive oppositions and threats, was so that we the people could know the truth. Don't fall for the lies. God is all powerful all knowing and all present so it is literally impossible for truth not to exist in the world.
The KJV 1769 is the correct Bible. Those who are trying to vilify the KJV are always referring to the older version.
It really isn't
Seems like the devil is behind this video