Integrity Syndicate
Integrity Syndicate
  • Видео 88
  • Просмотров 86 954
Tom (TJump) vs Josiah (Integrity Syndicate), Discussion and Commentary
This is an edited version of Josiah’s (Unitarian Christian) Discussion with TJump (Atheist) with additional commentary by Josiah. Theophilus Josiah is the founder of Integrity Syndicate, a ministry with about 30 websites.
TJump (Tom) is a popular atheist on RUclips who has engaged in many debates. Original Interview on the TJump RUclips channel: ruclips.net/video/G5nnDrICQWQ/видео.html
Integrity Syndicate Website:
1st Century Christianity - integritysyndicate.com
The basis for Biblical Unitarianism: TrueUnitarian.com
The case for holding Luke-Acts Primacy: lukeprimacy.com
Issues with the Fourth Gospel: IsueswithJohn.com
Foundational authorities of the traditional NT canon ntcanon.com
Want to disc...
Просмотров: 462

Видео

Review of Jay Dyer and Orthodox Arguments on the Canon of Scripture
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.2 года назад
Josiah, Troy Salinger, and Keith Fusion review various comments from Jay Dyer in a discussion he had with a Protestant regarding the Canon of Scripture. The livestream was originally recorded Feb 5, 2022. This is the second half of a stream responding to Jay Dyer that was originally about 3.5 hours long. Content covered is from Jay Dyer's show ruclips.net/video/U8_Z-9wGaHo/видео.html The Basis ...
LUKE-ACTS PRIMACY / NT CANON, Part 2 Discussion with Anthony Buzzard and Carlos Xavier
Просмотров 2882 года назад
Sir Anthony Buzzard and Carlos Xavier of Restoration Fellowship join the Live Stream for further discussion, after Josiah's Rebuttal This is an edited version 0f the Live Stream on Saturday of June 25, 2022. Part 1 Is Josiah's Rebuttal, and Part 2 is the later discussion with Carlos Xavier and Anthony Buzzard. The case for holding Luke-Acts Primacy: lukeprimacy.com Foundational authorities of t...
LUKE-ACTS PRIMACY / NT CANON, Part 1 Rebuttal of Anthony Buzzard and Carlos Xavier
Просмотров 3772 года назад
Josiah addresses comments made on the recent stream on the Focus on the Kingdom RUclips channel entitled "IntegritySyndicate Luke-Acts Primacy REBUTTAL!" featuring Sir Anthony Buzzard and Carlos Xavier of Restoration Fellowship. Rebuttal video from Focus on the Kingdom: ruclips.net/video/-Z-NAQUgQyI/видео.html Biblical Unitarian Podcast 204 with Dustin Smith: ruclips.net/video/AUNLO9Zm83o/видео...
Jesus Is God By Predication But Not By Identity, Part 6 of 6
Просмотров 2592 года назад
Jesus Is God By Predication But Not By Identity Part 6 of 6 of a Biblical Reference Guide On Who Jesus Is (Christology) Web pages: trueunitarian.com/biblical-christology/ integritysyndicate.com/biblical-christology/ Integrity Syndicate Websites: Integrity Syndicate - 1st Century Christianity - www.integritysyndicate.com Biblical Unitarian Sites: trueunitarian.com/ - The foundations of Biblical ...
Jesus The Word of God, Whose Testimony is the Spirit of Prophecy, Part 5 of 6
Просмотров 1362 года назад
Jesus The Word of God, Whose Testimony is the Spirit of Prophecy Part 5 of 6 of a Biblical Reference Guide On Who Jesus Is (Christology) Web pages: trueunitarian.com/biblical-christology/ integritysyndicate.com/biblical-christology/ Integrity Syndicate Websites: Integrity Syndicate - 1st Century Christianity - www.integritysyndicate.com Biblical Unitarian Sites: trueunitarian.com/ - The foundat...
Jesus The Mediator Between God and Man, Our High Priest, The Necessary Way, Part 4 of 6
Просмотров 1742 года назад
Jesus The Mediator Between God and Man, Our High Priest, The Necessary Way, Part 4 of 6
Jesus The Firstborn of All Creation, The Blessed One, The Anointed Lord, Part 3 of 6
Просмотров 2182 года назад
Jesus The Firstborn of All Creation, The Blessed One, The Anointed Lord, Part 3 of 6
Biblical Christology, Jesus The Christ, The Messiah, The Son of Man, The Son of God, Part 2 of 6
Просмотров 2922 года назад
Biblical Christology, Jesus The Christ, The Messiah, The Son of Man, The Son of God, Part 2 of 6
Biblical Christology, Jesus The Man, The Prophet, The Sinless Servant of God, Part 1 of 6
Просмотров 4332 года назад
Biblical Christology, Jesus The Man, The Prophet, The Sinless Servant of God, Part 1 of 6
Refutation of a Trinitarian Apologetics Manual, Part 2, With Josiah, Soul and Ness, Edited
Просмотров 2362 года назад
Refutation of a Trinitarian Apologetics Manual, Part 2, With Josiah, Soul and Ness, Edited
The Evolution of the Doctrine of the Trinity, Early Church History
Просмотров 8 тыс.2 года назад
The Evolution of the Doctrine of the Trinity, Early Church History
Refutation of a Trinitarian Apologetics Manual, Part 1 with Josiah, Soul and Ness, Edited Livestream
Просмотров 6172 года назад
Refutation of a Trinitarian Apologetics Manual, Part 1 with Josiah, Soul and Ness, Edited Livestream
Is Jesus God in the Gospel of Mark? Refutation of Mike Licona & Michael Jones of InspiringPhilosophy
Просмотров 5122 года назад
Is Jesus God in the Gospel of Mark? Refutation of Mike Licona & Michael Jones of InspiringPhilosophy
The Perilous Trinity Deep Dive, Mixtape of UCA Podcast featuring Mark Cain (Corrected Subtitles)
Просмотров 1862 года назад
The Perilous Trinity Deep Dive, Mixtape of UCA Podcast featuring Mark Cain (Corrected Subtitles)
Jesus Is the Model, Understanding How Jesus Is the Model for Us
Просмотров 2632 года назад
Jesus Is the Model, Understanding How Jesus Is the Model for Us
The Godhead Explained, Review of Marcus Rogers' appeal for unity and his theological explanations
Просмотров 5512 года назад
The Godhead Explained, Review of Marcus Rogers' appeal for unity and his theological explanations
The KJV Is Corrupt, Exposing the King James Version of the Bible
Просмотров 41 тыс.2 года назад
The KJV Is Corrupt, Exposing the King James Version of the Bible
Perseverance to the End, Narration With Bible Verses
Просмотров 752 года назад
Perseverance to the End, Narration With Bible Verses
Unitarianism From The Early Church Through the Middle Ages, Journal Article Narration
Просмотров 2152 года назад
Unitarianism From The Early Church Through the Middle Ages, Journal Article Narration
Trinitarianaism is Theological Disneyland, Part 3 - Panel Review of Jay Dyer on Incarnation
Просмотров 6012 года назад
Trinitarianaism is Theological Disneyland, Part 3 - Panel Review of Jay Dyer on Incarnation
Trinitarianaism is Theological Disneyland, Part 2 Review of Trinitarian Doctrine
Просмотров 6152 года назад
Trinitarianaism is Theological Disneyland, Part 2 Review of Trinitarian Doctrine
Prayer is Necessary, Narration With Bible Verses
Просмотров 422 года назад
Prayer is Necessary, Narration With Bible Verses
Gift of the Holy Spirit, Narration With Bible Verses
Просмотров 472 года назад
Gift of the Holy Spirit, Narration With Bible Verses
Baptism In Jesus Name, Narration With Bible Verses
Просмотров 1092 года назад
Baptism In Jesus Name, Narration With Bible Verses
Repentance, Narration with Bible Verses
Просмотров 542 года назад
Repentance, Narration with Bible Verses
Life, Death, and the Hope of Salvation, Narration with Bible Verses
Просмотров 922 года назад
Life, Death, and the Hope of Salvation, Narration with Bible Verses
Jesus the Messiah, Narration with Bible Verses
Просмотров 872 года назад
Jesus the Messiah, Narration with Bible Verses
One God and Father, Narration with Bible Verses
Просмотров 882 года назад
One God and Father, Narration with Bible Verses
Not Under the Law, Narration with Bible Verses
Просмотров 1362 года назад
Not Under the Law, Narration with Bible Verses

Комментарии

  • @steveconn1375
    @steveconn1375 День назад

    The Niv is corrupted

  • @steveconn1375
    @steveconn1375 День назад

    So much garbage this king James him self did not write the bible I'f so he would not say that two men sleeping together was a sin as king James himself was boysexaul he was also an freemason so he would have altered the word of God

  • @rram421
    @rram421 3 дня назад

    I left as soon as I heard a robot speaking.

  • @saintphoenix6723
    @saintphoenix6723 4 дня назад

    Robot voice to discredit the bible. In four seconds, this discredited itself.

  • @normmcinnis4102
    @normmcinnis4102 4 дня назад

    This shows irrefuteable proof: ruclips.net/video/t6ck6KrVPIk/видео.html

  • @adramelek1000
    @adramelek1000 5 дней назад

    I use esv, nkjv, and once in awhile with really difficult verses the niv. But mainly esv and nkjv

  • @FirstLast-zk5ow
    @FirstLast-zk5ow 5 дней назад

    They persecute the KJB; just like they did Jesus. That alone brought me to understanding the Truth. That our Lord Jesus, the King of Kings, was, is, and is to come. Be prepared; Repent and Believe. #kjb #is uncorruptable.

    • @henrylaurel1188
      @henrylaurel1188 2 дня назад

      So not falling for the KJV only deception is persecuting the KJV? How pathetic is the KJV only cult.

    • @FirstLast-zk5ow
      @FirstLast-zk5ow 2 дня назад

      @@henrylaurel1188 Not quite. However amusing this anti-kjb cult is; you have to feel sorry for how easily they are manipulated by the world and how weak and fearful they are not to question the lies told about the KJB. I pray for you , my weak minded and easily frightened little friend. One day you will gain the strength and courage to read the KJB for yourself.

    • @FirstLast-zk5ow
      @FirstLast-zk5ow 2 дня назад

      @@henrylaurel1188 What makes you too weak minded and afraid to read the KJB for yourself?? I pray for you, my weak minded and easily frightened little friend. That you gain the strength and courage to read the KJB for yourself.

  • @stephenphillips6024
    @stephenphillips6024 6 дней назад

    Maybe Trump should start reading the Bible and stop fornicating like King James did. #MaleCourtiers

  • @aaronmyers4665
    @aaronmyers4665 7 дней назад

    The church was already established for 15 centuries before this became an issue, the prostant reformation was an Anti-Catholic movement to secularism that is thriving today the reason the KJV translation is still an issue is because people have used the language of the KJV as a foundation to false beliefs

  • @DeeDe_1111
    @DeeDe_1111 9 дней назад

    THE DEVIL LOVES THE KJV… 🫤 we can’t keep letting these seeds grow that ignorant people refused to do the work and find out the truth on. That they are so conformed and scared to fucking death! Religion is for those who fear Hell. Spirituality is for those who have been there and came out knowing the SUN ☀️ and The Divine God And the true Gospel. The ignorance does tend to bring a bit of irritability to me. Which I am learning to control. Stupidity is not easy to deal with it’s like the word common sense! The shit doesn’t exist anymore.

  • @melaniebaynes2730
    @melaniebaynes2730 9 дней назад

    ​@Pootycat8359 Can't respond directly to your comment, so I am posting it here instead. You do know that God states in the Bible, that He would purify His Word seven times? What do you suppose He meant by that? That He would see it worked upon, purified, made more accessible to every part of the world? Too many people attribute too much power to the devil, and don't credit God with enough.

  • @user-pp1cf9of9s
    @user-pp1cf9of9s 10 дней назад

    They are not corrupt. Thank you. Your choice to reject it. Not my fault

  • @user-pp1cf9of9s
    @user-pp1cf9of9s 10 дней назад

    Back then they didn't know what any of it meant so they really didn't know what to remove or keep.

  • @user-pp1cf9of9s
    @user-pp1cf9of9s 10 дней назад

    KjV is the one!!! Read all the other Scriptures that were banned or hidden also. They were banned because they tell you the truth of this world and the continued rulership of hybrids demons in skinsuits out of Edom to this day.

  • @Outspoken.Humanist
    @Outspoken.Humanist 11 дней назад

    Speaking as an atheist, with no dog in the fight, so to speak, of course the KJV is not corrupt. That's just ridiculous. It bears the mark of its authors and the authority under which they worked but so does every bible ever translated. Some modern bibles are closer to the original manuscripts simply because we have discovered earlier copies since the KJV was created but we do not have the 'originals' of any book of the bible and so 100% accuracy is not possible.

  • @Brandplucked
    @Brandplucked 11 дней назад

    This man obviously does not believe that any Bible in any language he can show us is now or ever was the complete and 100% true words of God and his video is full of lots of misinformation. The things he criticizes in the KJB are also found in the Geneva bible he mentions so favorably.

  • @americanswan
    @americanswan 13 дней назад

    The KJV is outdated, and even KJV onlyists pastors don't understand it. The English is too old. There are so many words and phrases that have changed meaning. The only way to understand the KJV is either a) learn Greek and Hebrew or b) £90 subscription to the Oxford Dictionary that includes the 1611 definitions. Modern Websters doesn't have 1611 definitions. It's stupid. Use a modern translation. I ain't joking. 100 KJV onlyists PASTORS, not children, were surveyed, and they did horrible. ONLY 9 pastors answered all the questions correctly. NINE. 9% of KJV Onlyists pastors UNDERSTAND the Word of God. Get your head out of the ground and read a Bible YOU can actually understand.

  • @JESUS_IN_TALMUD_SON_OF_PANTERA
    @JESUS_IN_TALMUD_SON_OF_PANTERA 14 дней назад

    king james was gay

  • @buukkreider544
    @buukkreider544 15 дней назад

    By God's Word - when the time is near the end of this Church Period, things get WORSE, not better. With all of these so-called scholars and theologians, newer and better translations of The Holy Bible are printed. The Word of God is The Word of God. The overall message in God's Word is that the Adam race is a fallen one. This is TRUTH. The answer to that is THE LORD JESUS CHRIST. He paid the price for ALL SINS... Just listen to The Apostle Paul, and believe: The Apostle Paul - Mentions the Way of Salvation Paul did not detest the Law of Moses. Paul actually believed in The Law, but did not understand that God was going to bring in the grace. It had to first be a sacrifice - and that sacrifice was Jesus Christ. Paul did not detest The Law but quoted from Moses and explained what Moses could not explain back then, because it wasn't time yet. Moses means "drawn out" - and God used Moses to 'draw out' Israel from Egypt. The Hebrews spent scores of years in Egypt, and it was time to move on. The word 'Church' means "Called Out" - by Christ, the Church was called out of the world to make a people for God. In the epistles written by Paul, especially Romans and Galatians he explained the purpose of the church. In The Law in Deuteronomy 32 - God had Moses teach Joshua and the Children of Israel a song. This song was going to attest what the Children of Israel was going to do, including turning their back on God. But... in the end, God would bring Israel back. In that chapter, the Church was foretold due to Israel's idolatry which caused jealousy from God. For that reason God used a people that were not a people to cause Israel to jealousy. The Apostle Paul explains this in Romans 9, 10, and 11. Acts 13:38,39 38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.

  • @buukkreider544
    @buukkreider544 15 дней назад

    Jeremiah 10: The GREAT GOD 6 Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O LORD; thou art great, and thy name is great in might. 7 Who would not fear thee, O King of nations? for to thee doth it appertain: forasmuch as among all the wise men of the nations, and in all their kingdoms, there is none like unto thee. 10 But the LORD is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king: at his wrath the earth shall tremble, and the nations shall not be able to abide his indignation. 11 Thus shall ye say unto them, The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even they shall perish from the earth, and from under these heavens. 12 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion. 13 When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures.

  • @buukkreider544
    @buukkreider544 15 дней назад

    The Apostle Paul - Mentions the Way of Salvation Paul did not detest the Law of Moses. Paul actually believed in The Law, but did not understand that God was going to bring in the grace. It had to first be a sacrifice - and that sacrifice was Jesus Christ. Paul did not detest The Law but quoted from Moses and explained what Moses could not explain back then, because it wasn't time yet. Moses means "drawn out" - and God used Moses to 'draw out' Israel from Egypt. The Hebrews spent scores of years in Egypt, and it was time to move on. The word 'Church' means "Called Out" - by Christ, the Church was called out of the world to make a people for God. In the epistles written by Paul, especially Romans and Galatians he explained the purpose of the church. In The Law in Deuteronomy 32 - God had Moses teach Joshua and the Children of Israel a song. This song was going to attest what the Children of Israel was going to do, including turning their back on God. But... in the end, God would bring Israel back. In that chapter, the Church was foretold due to Israel's idolatry which caused jealousy from God. For that reason God used a people that were not a people to cause Israel to jealousy. The Apostle Paul explains this in Romans 9, 10, and 11. Acts 13:38,39 38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins: 39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.

  • @soteriacharis6338
    @soteriacharis6338 15 дней назад

    Very interesting!! I could never understand why so many Christians treat the KJV like the holy grail. Guess it makes them feel super spiritual.

  • @cycribbs
    @cycribbs 18 дней назад

    There is absolutely nothing corrupt about the king james, but the Geneva Bible has a lot of corruptions

  • @abstraction6212
    @abstraction6212 19 дней назад

    Christianity as a whole is corrupt from the start. Follow rational thought, take responsibility for your actions and consequences, and be a practical thinker.

  • @shawnd9759
    @shawnd9759 20 дней назад

    Protestant are not Hebrews!

  • @shawnd9759
    @shawnd9759 20 дней назад

    King James was a black king. Why do you keep whitewashing history??

  • @hubertlancaster
    @hubertlancaster 21 день назад

    Jesus did not disavow that He was an integral part of God as the physical representation of the invisible God. We read this in, John 8:56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. John 8:57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. John 8:59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by. And in, Joh 10:30 I and my Father are one. Jesus is plain in saying that His phisical body and the Spirit of the Father are one as two natures. Aside from that we were made in the image of God as both Spiritual and physical beings. God is a man in Christ Jesus. He took on the seed the likeness of Abraham.

  • @hubertlancaster
    @hubertlancaster 22 дня назад

    We must understand that there is no such thing as a trinity. The easiest way to understand the Godhead is that Jesus is the Body of God and the Spirit of the Father is the Spirit of Jesus as the Christ, the blending of two natures and not persons. We read this in, 2 Co 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself. Even nature itself demonstrates the nature of God because we were made in God’s image, which is Jesus Christ; both body and Spirit. Colossians 2:9 tells us that all the fullness of the Godhead dwelt in Jesus Christ, making Him the Incarnation of God Almighty. John says this in, John 3:34 For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God: for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him. Jesus had the fullness of God in Himself. Paul says in 1 Corinthians, the 15th chapter, that there is a natural body and there is a Spiritual body. Jesus is then the body of God Almighty as a dwelling place for God, both in a natural body and a Spiritual body. The mystery is that the Holy Ghost is the Spirit of God almighty. Every person who receives the Holy Ghost is added to the body of Christ as a habitation for the Father. Our bodies are made up of trillions of living cells, all working in union as a body for our spirit. The Spirit of God’s Body is much more Glorious, as it is made up of trillions of Holy Ghost-filled people. This is the reason that His Voice of God is like a multitude. Daniel saw a vision of God in His Body in the 10th Chapter. Jesus said in John the 10th chapter “I and my Father are one,” I take it as the same one visible and invisible.

  • @malakhi08
    @malakhi08 22 дня назад

    I see people will believe any translation no matter what it says… Even it is evident that it’s not original or same meaning

  • @koopx6140
    @koopx6140 23 дня назад

    ai voices are corrupt lol

  • @dynamicloveministries334
    @dynamicloveministries334 23 дня назад

    the trinity view is very very complex, and the appealing to authority is amazing

  • @simplechristian1
    @simplechristian1 26 дней назад

    Really. Your so spineless you have to use a computer voice. That is so cowardly. I'm actually surprised. So you know more then 50 bible s holders. I doubt it.

  • @JKV84
    @JKV84 26 дней назад

    Did trinitarians kill the opposite side and if so do you have anything on this?

  • @JKV84
    @JKV84 27 дней назад

    Luckily more and more are waking up from the manmade Trinity nonsense and are coming to the one true and most high God = the father Yahweh. And his litteral and true son Jesus.

  • @OliGamer-rz4pk
    @OliGamer-rz4pk 27 дней назад

    We are sided with Anthony not because we are followers of Anthony but because using our own minds and texts and contexts from the Bible (of which Anthony highlights) we see for ourselves the proof in front of our eyes. Anthony is a powerhouse because God is on his side and he provides real exegesis rather than parroting the talking points. Your anxiety and panic was not because you are a new debater. It is because you were up against the Truth. The unclean spirits of the Gospel got scared too when they were speaking to the Truth.

  • @RonaldMillsaps
    @RonaldMillsaps Месяц назад

    No, the zkJV is not cirrupt, ahf we should absolutely use a word-for-word Bible translation. Also, stay away from Calvinism, which is a doctrine of demons.

  • @armandomalonzo9428
    @armandomalonzo9428 Месяц назад

    you cannot correct the KJV 1611 BIBLE you commentator you must correct your dirty mind REVELATION 22:18,19

  • @armandomalonzo9428
    @armandomalonzo9428 Месяц назад

    this commentator is one of the Anti Christ

  • @Nazareneanobis
    @Nazareneanobis Месяц назад

    The Word of God (LOGOS) is not ink and paper! It is written on the tablet of the Heart!

    • @RichardGriffin-b9n
      @RichardGriffin-b9n 15 часов назад

      How true ..how true.. The light of Christ. Illuminates. Darkness cannot be around light without it having an effect. Cause and effect ✝️🙏

  • @BartDelaCruz-gi7yu
    @BartDelaCruz-gi7yu Месяц назад

    Most of your quotations are misrepresented and misinterpreted.

  • @webstar37
    @webstar37 Месяц назад

    The Authrized 1611 King James Bible is GOD'S WORD Preserved in the English language, and is RELIABLE , AND all the MODERN Versions having a "COPYRIGHT" are Completely CORRUPT and Unreliable ! COME TO CHRIST, COME TO LIFE !!!

    • @TheCrucifixFishTestifies
      @TheCrucifixFishTestifies Месяц назад

      Is Yahweh really going to resurrect unsaved people and then keep them alive supernaturally for eternity so that he can burn them alive for eternity in a place called "hell"? Is that really what the scriptures teach?

    • @webstar37
      @webstar37 Месяц назад

      @TheCrucifixFishTestifies YES, they made their own choice, choosing to reject GOD'S CHRIST, GOD'S Provision for Deliverence from Hell's Flames, choosing rather to live according to the ways of this present evil world, and the lusts thereof !!! Revelation 20: 11 - 15

    • @TheCrucifixFishTestifies
      @TheCrucifixFishTestifies Месяц назад

      @@webstar37 The Greek word “hades” translated as “hell” comes from the Roman Catholic Church. This idea of eternal hell fire is a wicked teaching and comes from paganism. Better and modern translations translate hades as “grave”. The Old Testament word for the grave is “sheol”. Hades and sheol are synonymous and mean the grave or the state of being dead. The New Testament word Gehenna is also mistranslated as hell and means the lake of fire where the unjust will be destroyed (Math 10:28). The word tartarus (2 Pet 2:4) is also mistranslated as hell, and that is the place where fallen angels are being held until the final judgment. So you can see the confusion, three different words all translated the same causing confusion to this subject and slander to God’s character as to what He is going to do to the unjust. This is a huge problem thanks to the KJV.

    • @webstar37
      @webstar37 Месяц назад

      @@TheCrucifixFishTestifies YES ! YOU MUST BE BORN AGAIN! COME TO CHRIST COME TO LIFE !!!

    • @webstar37
      @webstar37 Месяц назад

      @@TheCrucifixFishTestifies WRONG Translation, and the KING JAMES Is The ONLY Perfectly Perserved Word of GOD in the English language!!!

  • @1korincanima151-4
    @1korincanima151-4 Месяц назад

    The devil always attacks the truth through his puppets on a string.

    • @henrylaurel1188
      @henrylaurel1188 25 дней назад

      The devil uses the KJV only cult to attack the truth.

    • @1korincanima151-4
      @1korincanima151-4 25 дней назад

      @@henrylaurel1188 I'm certainly not going to read modern fake New Age Bibles, it's not just the KJV 1611 good Bible, but all of them that are translated from the same Texas Receptus accepted source

  • @DarikStone
    @DarikStone Месяц назад

    Although I like most of the content on this channel, and that many of the people whom are refuted against in todays society on here concerning the trinity and shedding Gods light: I'd have to say that that there were many errors in this video concerning the 1611, especially the arasmus rumor; it's a rumor, and if you look deeply enough into that subject, and look at the documents, 1john 5:7 has always been in the greek and arasmus never forged anything. He has statements. And arasmus refuted the rumor, and even names of the highest scholars of textual criticism have admitted this error on their part against 1john. Experts in linguistics, and texual analysis have heavily studied 1john and have concluded that 1john makes no sense in anyway grammatically or contextually, in the greek or english with 5:7 missing based off of many things. And it was also one of the leading forces on why the creed did what they did. If it were not for that main verse, the creed wouldn't have used the pagan the argument they did, so strongly. 1john 5:7 was well in circulation in the body of Christ, revelations backs and harmonized it as well. 1stjohn is a reflection of Genesis, and the gospel of john introduction and revelation and it bears record to the entire bible. Beginning to end. And scholars have acknowledged this. The fact that the creed argued it, is the very evidence it was there, and the fact that it was there, and the church was still oneness, and refused to believe the trinity, was even further proof that it didn't mean what the creed thought it did. The written documents between the creed reveal this very truth about the early body of Christ. Arguing that 5:7 wasn't there to refute Trinitarianism is actually a worse argument, and a bad stance. They even exiled the arians from the council, and persecuted them too, because of the oneness stance they took that half way agreed with the trinitarian discussion; they shared similar concept but that Jesus with God preincarnate physically from the beginning or similar rather....So what does this tell you...that the verse was there.. The argument wasn't for no reason... It was one of the strongest reasoning for their convoluted minds. In otherwords, to believe otherwise is simply intellectual suicide. Because what are you arguing, if it wasn't there, and what are you arguing for them if they didn't think it was there? What are you arguing against them if it wasn't their? So what is the witness of men? And why is the witness of God greater? There were other errors I've found with this video, about the 1611 as well, that try to point to "sinister conspiracy" that piggyback from what I've said, because of the emphasis on 1john 5:7, And as well as just not considering mans fallible ways. No translation can be perfect, but I do think the 1611 is going to be the closest in as few errors as possible regarding execution, compared to any other translations, and so i believe in started where we have the most accurate grounds to then look up specific meanings of words. If not, try to look up something in an NIV in the same verse as a 1611 and let me know if you get the same meaning for the intended word given in translation; use a different word or less accurate word and you get a different meaning in the original language; because it's not accurate. Infact I dont just think, but i KNOW, that if people are putting that much faith in man, that they are not even ever checking the Greek or Hebrew, you are doing yourself a disservice to the honesty of the original languages to begin with and God's WORD. It is textually impossible to have a perfect translational interpretation and literal meaning in a sound way at the same time; You have to choose one: or the other. The bibles we have, are not meant for literal accuracy, they are meant to convey accurate interpretation... Tell me how many verses make sense to you when you read from a youngs literal translation......... Studying is different than reading. You cannot read any single english bible, and expect literal accuracy, so if you need to understand doctrinal specifics, you HAVE TO look up original language for literal meaning. The bibles we have were meant to convey in spirit of the writing in HOPEFULLY the most sound way possible. There are too many language rules we would break if we wanted what we keep arguing the sake of, and believe me, we don't really want that... We would not understand a thing. Stop putting faith in man, and put your faith in our oneness Father, and His son Jesus Christ, and just study. I was saved by the WORD, but if I toss out my bible I'm still saved. No man is perfect but Jesus Christ. Stop trying to make man perfect. I believe as according to even the prefacial dedicatory statements, by the translators to you in the 1611, that they did their best. That's all they claimed to do, and I appreciate their humbleness for admitting that. If you want God's true understanding, you need to labor for it; and you are expected to. I believe the 1611 had the best intention, and conveyed with the best intent in spirit of laboring for translation in light of balance between literal and interpretational honesty in a way that the gentiles would best grasp understanding: Because when I read anything else, it's "just not there" : pronouns, punctuation, attitude, grammar, expression, etc. Don't believe me; try mathew 5 on divorce in 1611, and tell me the difference in what you see in every other translation, from NASB to NIV. On what the real issue of divorce was and what the Jews of their time were doing, and pay sharp attention to dissect those 2 verse in 1611. Thats just one example... Screw the spelling. I want the heart of the intent... I believe their will never be another translation like the 1611 ever again, especially with how lost the english language has become, and the worse it is getting. If you don't think language can be so far removed, ask yourself how many translation will start to pump out according to keeping up with words in english like "mewing", and "looksmaxing" and how badly they will have to alter the original languages to facilitate translation and interpretation to that... There is such a thing as too far: And it's already bad enough. But at the end of the day, we have to pick a translation, and shit, or get off the pot.... The 1611 sheds light on many things that no other translation does in many ways, as apposed to others. If you look at every man, with the same faith you need to put in jesus, you will always think they're conspiring against you. We live by the spirit of the law of love and liberty, for a reason. We live by spiritual understanding, spiritual expression of the law, if we so choose, but Had Jesus not come, I think we'd be in big trouble relying on any textual integrity of english, from Hebrew and Greek, to convey even the Law of the commandments, contained in ordinances, let me tell you... We need to know what is spiritually doctrinally important for today, because like the Law, that's our spiritual equivalent in such cases, that marks salvific difference, unfortunately with these new translations. We should focus on what is exceptionally scholarly, and warn people about what is truly the garbage of today; If we demonize the 1611 in light of everything I've said, what will we push future believers to read from? What are they reading from now??...Would you rather them read a 1611 or an NET, NLT, NIV, NRSV, or a McArthur lordship reference bible?? We have to find a common ground and fight for something: We are all believers in the body of Christ and are more equipped spiritually than I fear the newer believers ever will have a chance to be, unfortunately, and we have to steer the younger and spiritually naive generation of believers in a direction; what direction is that going to be?? Go for the majority in accurate conveyance, keep faith in Jesus, and look up the text if the Spirit of the Father wants you to. No translation is as faithful as Jesus Christ; but know when a translation is absolutely conspiring against Jesus, and not yourself. Amen, Be Blessed, be well.

    • @DarikStone
      @DarikStone Месяц назад

      infact the whole purpose of the 1611 Bible was made for layman people, the common person, to have God's word and be understood in a common manner. It was not created for the scholarly and academics. They are two different things, two different types of people, two different purposes, and the common man cannot dedicate his layman life to living for God's word in the same way, and as academically as a scholar. This refutes the very purpose of the 1611,and what it stood for, and if you don't believe that, then why did even this video record the very errors of even the scholarly... This is what I mean. It is okay, for the common man to be the common man and common woman, and let teachers be academic. We should all teach interpretation to one another in good spirit, and sound spiritual understanding, we need scholars, and they're held to a higher degree by the Father. God doesn't expect the same of us. We will have rewards for different things down here. God wants to use us differently, but I do think that we should also use our God given discernment with the best of our God given abilities to have this understanding about things, and to put our best foot forthright. We easily scoff at scholars, but who's really put out a better translation than the 1611 since it's inception? Nitpicking a word or phrase is not even merely scratching the surface, in entailing what is required in and of, the translational profession. These people a have to be capable of linguistic marksmanship, and genius level of understanding, not only in language, in multicultural understanding, but grammar, punctuation, and everything that belongs to specific said language, heritage, interpretation, conveyance, rules of said language vs our very own language concerning structure, and Ordinances. And they need to know how to conjunctualize, and deliver it. Maybe it was done with their English culture in mind, but it's definitely to be much more respected than the culture that we currently live in. They had a level of proficiency that not one scholar consistently has to this day. Infact: what scholar do we know today, that has any extreme level of excellence in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic today, letalone all 3 beyond, paper, and a couple early college courses, and that can even properly hold a culturally decent verbal conversation with anybody in those languages even at a street level, today; that are even still studying? And why haven't we come out with anything better than the 1611? Nobody today is capable; that is why. Do we read 5 different translations with our kids, and set down the 1611? The further out we move with our watered down and deterioration of an English language, the further away we get from understanding these ancient languages. Look where we are from the 1611. Look where those scholars were when they made it accessible for mankind in English. Both of our cultural differences may have their gripes, but I think the way they interpreted the scriptures was definitely reflective of something to show for importance of something we are lacking today, at the very least. Something we lack that is incapable of reproduction. Some things are gone for good. King James didn't want reference notes; I agree that it has done nothing but impede the reader and confuse our spirit, and sway believers on personal bias of the note makers. How many reference and study bibles today are completely denominationally and reformationally filled with junk and lies. There's a serious lack of appreciation, we're an ungrateful generation; We have nothing but trash translations today, and the 1611 was put out to a generation that had basically none, and was able to produce what they did. The Geneva was not perfect either and in also many more worse ways than the 1611, with or without it's references. We can study what exactly was wrong with that Bible, too. It was beyond a King-Conspiracy. We can say what we want about their generation and their culture and religious actions, but is not an excuse to exile the 1611, they were the closest thing to a generation the was biologically conservative to boot. Would we today, expect them to read from an NIV from a generation that can't even tell what a man is or what a woman is, when they read the horrors that are of that translation compared to what they put out for us? They put that 1611 out for us.... We aught to think good before we accuse their culture as anxious to read from anything else. What would they think about our laws? Infact; If we hung tight to their very translation the way they'd hoped people would have appreciated, I think our society would even be in better shape.

  • @alanwilby9927
    @alanwilby9927 Месяц назад

    ...ITS CALLED THE ETRNAL GOSPEL..IN REVELATION....SO WHAT BIBLE IS THE ETERNAL. GOSPEL ....NOT THE CATHOLIC BIBLE..OR THE MODERN ONES BECAUSE HALF OF GODS WORD IS MISSING...ITS THE KJV BIBLE...THERE...SOLVED...

  • @RodMartinJr
    @RodMartinJr Месяц назад

    Interesting interpretations, and kudos for the Unitarian theme, but even there you may be missing some things -- *_evidence_* found in scripture for the preexistence of souls. Not only do we find this thesis implied in Numbers 14.18, Ezekiel 18, and elsewhere, but it is more explicitly found in the conversation Christ had with his disciples about Elijah returned, and all the questions by fellow Jews to John and Jesus about which prophet they were, returning in a new incarnation. 😎♥✝🇺🇸💯 REFERENCES: *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom: God's Reason for Noah's Flood_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_The Logical Christian_* (hardcover) *_Trinity Treason: How the church betrayed its flock with the only unforgivable sin_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_Meaning and Context: Creation_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_Enemies of Christ_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_The Science of Miracles_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_Four Elements of God_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_Proof of God_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_The Art of Forgiveness_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook) *_Dumb Genius: How intelligence is sometimes its own worst enemy_* (hardcover, paperback, ebook)

  • @robertadam3841
    @robertadam3841 Месяц назад

    This video is poorly researched and produced. It has a lot of bias and factual errors, and it omits a lot of facts. For instance, every single copy of Mark in Greek that had chapter 16 has verses 9-20 except Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. The former was set to be burned to heat the mess hall of a monastery and the latter sat rejected and unused on a Vatican shelf until the latter part is the 19th Century. The Reformers were are of such variants and yet they held with the traditional text. But modern textual criticism…

  • @markwpatterson
    @markwpatterson Месяц назад

    It SHOULD be crystal clear after all this gobbledy-gook that this is all a grand scheme invented by humans. The fact that this supposed 'god' ONLY gave ONE TRANSLATION to humans then let the humans sort out translating it into the other thousands of languages over HUNDREDS of years SHOULD cause great concern to those who give ANY credence to this collection of books. Don't you THINK a 'god' could do a better job of presenting a 'message of salvation' to humanity? NONE of it makes any sense. Meanwhile, millions of people DIED whilst humans were trying to 'translate' the 'words of god' into the world's languages. What TF happened to their 'souls' while men were trying to 'figure it all out'??? To those who couldn't actually READ??? I don't really understand WHY TF humans can't just ACCEPT that there are things we, as humans, are NOT meant to know in this life. We have been left to try & figure it all out best we can & plunging head first into this SH@T HOLE of bible, AIN'T the answer we're all looking for. Just stop it, please.

  • @catholicrusader7
    @catholicrusader7 Месяц назад

    Jesus Christ promised hades will not prevail over His church and the Holy Spirit will guide it in truth these heretics 2000 years later: perverted corrupted church

  • @catholicrusader7
    @catholicrusader7 Месяц назад

    Unitarian heretics.

  • @catholicrusader7
    @catholicrusader7 Месяц назад

    Unitarian heretics.