Hello, I might be mistaken but I believe mounting the antennas at 90 degrees angle would increase the benefit from having two antennas. You could use the adjacent arms instead of the oposing arms.
A valid point for sure. I do know that they perform better placed vertically. Unfortunately, not all quads have the available setup space to mount them in this manner. A good test piloting for sure. Cheers. 🍻👍
I would recommend the elrs Dipole T Antenna. Others with the same ipex connector may work but you risk performance. I haven't tested that out to be honest. Good question. 👍🍻
It doesn't make any sense to put those antennas in the same orientation, as was done in the video...this basically kills the main purpose of the Diversity receiver, to have antennas in the different orientation and especially polarization, so it has better reception from more angles the quad can be in🤔
Different horses for Different courses. Horizontally or vertically. Take your pick vertically is more preferred but wasn't practicable in my application. 👍
@@GTARC_au Horizontally is ok but not both antennas pointing to the same direction, because when they are both pointing sideways to the radio, then both of them have no signal, so it is pointless doing it this way. They shouldn't be putting to the same direction but they should be placed in 90 degrees angle, so when one antenna is sideways, the other one has full signal😉
![☀ Самый дешевый дальнолет что я видел. Что он может? + Розыгрыш [DarwinFPV Tyro 129S]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/waFZUhpwjwI/mqdefault.jpg)
💥🏆▼ BETA FPV GEAR ▼🏆💥
Super D ELRS Diversity Receiver 👉bit.ly/40wkW5b
Hello, I might be mistaken but I believe mounting the antennas at 90 degrees angle would increase the benefit from having two antennas. You could use the adjacent arms instead of the oposing arms.
A valid point for sure. I do know that they perform better placed vertically. Unfortunately, not all quads have the available setup space to mount them in this manner. A good test piloting for sure. Cheers. 🍻👍
Greetings, friend... perfect tutorial. Thanks., Happy to see you.
Thank you! Cheers! See you soon!!
great job mate everything is getting smaller and smaller my glasses getting stronger and stronger
*always a full watch📺💯Au👍thumbs up*
Big thanks. Rock on BB. Great to see you as always mate! Take care.
As you are so awesome I've posted you on my FB channel pages!
@@GTARC_au cheers mate
Excellent sky😃👊👍 very interesting video my friend😁👌
Cheers mate. 🍻👍
Nice job assembling that mate.
Many thanks V6. How's your week going mate. 🍻
@@GTARC_au going well mate and hope the same for you🍻
Trying to decide this with true dual antenna diversity but only 50mw telemetry on elrs900.. or radiomaster bandit br3 with 500mw telemetry
If it were me I'd be going the elrs dual diversity all day mate. 🍺🏆👊
can i use any t shape 2.4 ghz elrs antenna of the super d receiver?
I would recommend the elrs Dipole T Antenna. Others with the same ipex connector may work but you risk performance. I haven't tested that out to be honest. Good question. 👍🍻
@@GTARC_au ok thank you
It doesn't make any sense to put those antennas in the same orientation, as was done in the video...this basically kills the main purpose of the Diversity receiver, to have antennas in the different orientation and especially polarization, so it has better reception from more angles the quad can be in🤔
Different horses for Different courses. Horizontally or vertically. Take your pick vertically is more preferred but wasn't practicable in my application. 👍
@@GTARC_au Horizontally is ok but not both antennas pointing to the same direction, because when they are both pointing sideways to the radio, then both of them have no signal, so it is pointless doing it this way. They shouldn't be putting to the same direction but they should be placed in 90 degrees angle, so when one antenna is sideways, the other one has full signal😉
is this the same as gemini?
Not sure mate. More details.pls. 🍺