If you enjoy Dr. Peterson's lectures you may be interested to know that his self narrated audiobooks “12 Rules for Life” amzn.to/2ipaBnQ (US) / amzn.to/2kpdXv9 (UK) / amzn.to/2jTRq67 (CA) and "Beyond Order" amzn.to/31EgIhP (US) / amzn.to/3wyochN (UK) / amzn.to/3EXzGON (CA) are currently available FOR FREE with the Amazon Audible trial program! The above are Amazon affiliate links.
You sir talk out your arse more than anything. You are going to say people do not fight over resources when the native people fought the US government over that. As a matter of fact the US government tried to starve the native people by exterminating the buffalo. You are full of shit sir. Ive lived long enough to know people will fight over resources so have you. I found your analogy about hitler disturbing. You going to give him some advice how to win the war then exterminate...what giving your white supremist ideas...because that about all that listen you. Nothing about unity, self sacrifice for your country and others or equality because you do not believe in those. You are toxic when i look at you i can see right straight through you. You are so dead inside. If in your position you have made enough money from your book... leave the united state go sit with the Dhal Lama and learn how to feel....because you cant. Laugh at me call me ignorant if you want...I've worked in the worst places you can't imagine seen the faces of people. i have seen and heard and felt the faces of people and im telling you Ive seen yours a thousand times from inmates.
Which came first? Nazi or Marxist? Which is the best system? You're talking about WWII without explaining The Great War? Men who fought in the trench's of WWI saw the horror that you or I could never understand or imagine. Even today, historians are still baffled about WWI. Historians agree that the Treaty of Versailles would've forced Germany into another war. Why would Germany, Italy and Japan form an Axis? What was their purpose? Their goal? Is it possible the 3 countries wanted to nip communist Joe Stalin, Mao Zedong in the bud. Camps became "death" camps when the allies starved who ever existed in the camps. Just wish the professor would use some common sense.
I love how his vocabulary is almost endless he doesn't stutter or struggle to find the right word to fill in the sentence, people like this are so interesting to talk to
reminds me of my dad who is also a professor. He never even had to prepare a lecture, just walked up and GO. Drove my mom crazy in college, she had to study her butt off and he just walked in and aced all the classes.
😂😂😂 I love it ... Live long enough for the common man to think having a regular understanding of history an psychology like really ... God we are a dumb ppl this man is giving you an 8 out of 10 cliff notes of what the real philosophers thought up ... Sad really
“If you can’t figure out the motive, look at the outcome and infer” I challenge everyone to filter American politics through this lens and see what you find
It shouldn't be used exclusively. As he said, it's just a tool in your analytical arsenal. You CAN infer, but that doesn't actually prove anything, especially in the presence of substantial auxiliary information.
@Seen not Heard “kindest empire the earth has ever seen” 😬🤣🤣🤣 k bud, just the juxtaposition of kind and empire is funny enough, but your delusion that we actually do good in other countries is hilarious
There's a book called Windswept Lies of War, and it talks from censored history and hidden secrets to lost files and classified documents about World War II, it's the real deal.
POV: You were recommended this 4 year old video and are looking through the pointless political fights in the comments realizing they're only a couple days old
Hitler killed his victims like a Bond villain would. He wasted time and effort tattooing them, transporting them, cataloging them, clothing them, housing them and then, of course, gassing them. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were rather more efficient monsters.
@@ehrjeo65 correct, hitler wouldnt sign off on the slaughter, himmler took the problem into his own hands. if the nazis hadn't killed the jews , we'd be reviewing him with envious eyes in regards to how a leader fights for the national state of its people. never thought id print such words, but the evidence is becoming very clear as one once said , we fought the wrong enemy.
@@mism847 then you're not a sociopath; sociopaths lack empathy but are unlike psychopaths who also have an urge to cause suffering, especially physical pain. Only, I don't know why everyone here is talking about this, as if Adolf was either of the two. Loving your people at the expense of who you perceive to be your enemies is the way all great men of old felt and acted for (even Jesus Christ)... unlike our "leaders" today, who love not their people.
I remember in secondary school… Having to do a presentation on ‘who’s the greatest person who ever lived’ and we chose who it was, I’ll keep my reply super short. In a small group we chose who is who, and me being the disliked outcast no one wanted on their team because I generally looked down upon how…. “Simple” people were, (Yeah, Arrogant, but I was bored waiting for them to grow up whilst they were being kids.) For instance, dating, petty childhood gossip and generally poor decisions made against me specifically, like I was bullied a fair bit. That’s just a reflection upon myself at the time. I’m prepared to have ‘that discussion’ with you or anyone else back then, it’s just no one was at that level especially with me. When I got the task of, :”Chosing the greatest person who ever lived within my opinion” - Well… I chose my friend. Well, I say friend, I only knew her for months, I didn’t know her for long, and due to memory loss (Undiagnosed, but I suspect it) I only remember fragments of our time together, granted, we were kids. Not everyone can remember every day they ever lived. She saved my life physically, it’s my belief of the fragments I remember she pushed me out the way of a car that then hit her. At the time and for a few years, I never knew what happened to her, I had to live with some kind of hope she was out there somewhere. I spoke to an old teacher and she told me, my friend (Who for all intends and purposes, wasn’t entirely viewed as a friend to me at the time, hence why I am sceptical on saying the word “friend” ) The teacher told me, she (my friend) was taken to hospital, the people from her home (It was a foster home) stayed with her and she died in hospital. I grew up wondering why she saved me, why did she do that? As I think anyone would do. Perhaps it was just, She couldn’t bare the thought in that moment her only friend (Maybe? closest? She didn’t have many friends in the memories or brief bits I remember). I was told I am NOT allowed to chose my friend, for the greatest person who ever lived. Even if they gave their life to put me in that room. Which is BS that a OPEN ended question like that can be rejected when it doesn’t meet some criteria within a syllabus for marking. If your to do a presentation, it should be on the quality of the presentation, NOT the choice of what the subject is. Instead I was forced into chosing Churchill, Which, History, especially in the UK schools (I started 2001-2012 from year 1, to end of year 11 GCSEs,) Germany and hitler was painted pretty negatively with Churchill painted as the hero we needed in our darkest hour. I don’t know how real or true it is and to what extent. According to a vocal conversation I had with someone (I believe it was family*) Churchill actually locked up the disabled and the disadvantaged people mentally. For instance, say learning difficulty (Autism for instance) and those who physically can’t do something. I’m not that big on history, but whenever a historical piece (Or inspired time setting) within a show comes up, say, Torchwood, Doctor Who, for instance. I always appreciate it when they show it “As it was” and not just gloss over some of the really cruel harsh elements. Like, there was an episode of Torchwood, where a WW2 soldier got displaced in time, and on some day he will go back in time to close a rift in space-time. Cool, They outright note, once he goes back, he’s not just gonna get the rest of his life there, He’s going to go back from the hospital he was in, where he was treated for his wounds from the front line. He was gonna get sent back to the front, he will suffer from shell shock, he will become paralysed and he’s going to get shot by his own team because he directly* can’t continue fighting. In some respects, Churchill and the British, were actually “not so clean” with the British empire for example. I honestly feel in my own opinion, Churchill, that was I told I have to chose, isn’t a clear-cut choice. He may have been the man at the for-front telling us what to believe within. However, he has his own dark elements. My choice, I’m Biased. I maybe entirely wrong within my presumption and how I’ve dealt with the trauma. So I’ll end with this quote from doctor who. “Good is good in the final hour, within the deepest pit, Without hope, Without witness, Without reward”
@@stasisasmr7724 as a history teacher myself, that is frustrating to me. I also give a lot of open ended and subjective questions to my students. You have to accept that students will not all to in the direction you want. Obviously, for you the most important person is the one who saved your life. As to the culpability of Churchill and England, there are several ways to frame it. Culturally, they weren't much different from any other country at the time in regards to mental health. Science ans understanding was not where it is today.
@Maske002 of course, I 100% get that, times have changed, My main thought (which I’m far far from knowing the full picture, and the full picture may paint a different opinion for myself.) But when you look at what England was doing, I get the impression we were being slightly brainwashed to ‘not be’ the bad guys. Within the idea, we by definition invaded countries and occupied them to create the British empire. Which… Granted, Hitler broke every treaty he signed forbidding him from invading country after country. Sure. That’s bad. But on the surface level, I get the impression it could have been very different providing you consider the British empire as a threat to the rest of the world. It’s an interesting thought, and whilst we just have history to look back on. Not the men and women who can give and portray a proper full account of it, genuinely I infer it more than suggest it, because everyone who once tried conquering the earth, started small and worked upwards. Whether it be for some unique belief and was intended for good rather than evil. Or the evil dictator who wanted total control over everywhere. Just on that presentation I once had to give (that I didn’t end up doing) I honestly see zero reason why it could have been either, greatest or worst person by history books. Providing your giving that argument which is what it was, a one sided argument. That would be clearer and allowed that choice to be present. Whilst containing it within the idea of someone past who people probably have heard of already. I also (it’s obvious and doesn’t need saying) the word great and worst is depending on which side you stand on, My argument in a hyperthetical brass tacks sense was. This is who you didn’t hear of. Who isn’t some big position, with high stakes controlling the nation to protect us or whatever. Just a person. You could always have someone who tries doing the right thing and is viewed as a overall good person with a decent heart* But not be remembered for that good attempt* Or someone like my friend who only ever managed to do one thing that you (I mean it politely) could say was a big thing. That had some impact and that’s all it was. But that one impact put me here, It gave me the potential I should say to be here, and if I go onto get past the PTSD, the loss of them, and any and all feelings of doubt and regret, but I put every person I ever meet before myself, Maybe one day, I might, in some way, make that same impact over the chance of years, and to many people. I may go every day singing her praises. And I’d happily give her the credit for it. That’s why she’s a better fit than others. Because I can say she didn’t benefit from what she gave. Quite the opposite, and with a fair few people we learned about in history (mainly wars, the plague, and a tiny bit of foreign history but not really) They all were figures that weren’t (to my opinion) ever explained properly to us, Like for instance Churchill was, Priminister, he gave that one speech and kept the countries spirits going despite nightly bombing… I mean it with no disrespect, history can’t just be taught within a 60 minute lesson, As someone with autism, I do find it hard sometimes to grasp the emotional side as well, (A little off topic) I do like those analytical videos that explain what is in a scene of say a TV/movie, and I may know all the lines for that episode for example* But I never grasped the idea of the not subtle message of say, this character lost someone they cared about, and suddenly gets put in a room where they have to deal with the aftermath, and following hints they are understanding, Suddenly they get told the next hint is buried underground, and so… they (metaphorically) are digging their own grave, So, I don’t know, maybe I never paid attention to history, but applied context is critical to understanding it especially with autism, God bless RUclips for that!
Pornographic books. As a child I was lead to believe he burned Jewish books to destroy any sense of their identities or something. Bro literally burned porn mags.
A high school teacher is literally like a high school kid compared to this guy. The way he speaks is just amazing. Genius level IQ. My history teacher just handed out packets for us to fill out while on his laptop 😂
Wish this guy was my teacher when I was in school. He actually cares about what he’s saying and talking about. Not just memorising a pre written lecture
Most people who say that wouldn’t have actually cared in school. Multiple teachers are like this if you actually pay attention. Then again, I’m biased because the majority of students are complete retards.
The thing that makes it so great is he puts real world relavence and pychology into it so we as the students can actually see the purpose of history in our learning. THATS what makes him a great teacher. Wish more teachers did this tho :(
Jordan just skips the fact that the expulsion of Jews in Germany started years before the war started. And many of them were in forced labor during the war, for example in the arms industry. What one should realize is that this was a process of 12 years, put into 4 minutes by Jordan.
It's coming quicker than anyone thinks in America. Conspiracy theories aren't theory anymore. I haven't gone down every rabbit hole looking for the truth, but I damn sure don't watch the tell-lie-vision. This man is willing to dig up unresolved issues like genocide without fear of the censors reprisal. He has reached prophet status in my humble uneducated opinion. We need a lot of wise men and women who are willing to discuss hard to discuss topics and without censorship put all arguement out on the table in the wide open. Stop the secrecy and the narcissistic abuse of entire nations. Everyone in America is suffering from being gaslit at this moment.
I like this guy. I don't know why he gets so much hate. He is an unbiased professional analyst, theorist and teacher. This is what they do. They don't take sides, they don't approve or disapprove. Their job is to analyze and theorize and educate. I see no racism or sexism or anything else. Just a brilliant guy being brilliant.
He's not an unintelligent man when he sticks to his area of specialty, Clinical Psychology. He's certainly not a 1st-rate thinker when he ventures outside his area, especially when he talks about history, politics, Marxism, Secular Humanism, atheism, Global Warming, etc., and frankly he's an embarrassment. If you've seen his debate with Matt Dillahunty, then you'll understand why. His lecture above was not a brilliant analysis because his logic and assumptions were weak and full of holes, too many to mention here. I don't dislike the man, and if he's helped young men and women lead better lives, then I applaud him in that area.
He offered peace after realizing UK had their own Lutfwaffe named Royal Air Force and they werent giving up at any point :D But there wasnt timid Chamberlain in front of him there was one of the most cunning or evil you can say man in history, Churchill, who doesnt F around when it comes to British interests.
@ absolutely wrong. He offered peace way before then. There are 9 peace offers documented. He wrote and repeatedly said he wanted a strong British empire. Instead, Churchill destroyed it.
@Emperor-Titus70AD IDK it might be true but if I was British Empire I wouldnt want a continental power thats why they beat Napoleon by gathering every single country in Europe. It's a duty of a British bureaucrat to think like that its not right or wrong. On the other hand Germany wants to get more natural resources because they are strong but they couldnt capitalize on Africa and other places as they are nearly landlocked. So I get everyside WW2 happened 4-5 times on smaller scale throughout 1600-1945. European shit nothing to see
@Emperor-Titus70ADpeace offer only to Brit’s. He didn’t want to fight the Brit’s but the Brit’s wouldn’t stand for his European expansion. So it’s disingenuous to write that he made several peace offerings.
Definitely feel like history & psychology should be taught intertwined together bc yeah, we need to know history to not repeat it but factoring in our human behaviors could help us understand why & how things of the past took place so we *actually* don’t repeat it.
Absolutely couldn't agree more. Just like everything else in reality, psychology is the understanding of any event involving humans. History is no different. Knowing History (what happened) is fine. Pondering the psychology (why it happened) is so much more valuable to us as society, and creating progress.
This is why I love Yuval Noah Hararri’s ‘Sapiens’ so much. It takes human history and analyzes the events from a psychological perspective, talking about development and technology in a whole new way.
Just don't kill a bunch of people. They did it in the past and it was bad. There, now we are in a utopian society where war doesn't exist. I want my Nobel Peace Prize now.
I see what you're saying and I agree we should not just study the event but the reasons for said event. They already are intertwined in a way though, all history has an aspect of psychology because it's all written by people with subjective views of the world and their experiences
@@frankie9772 Never seen anyone else mention this book on the internet but I guess we are in the intellectual corner of youtube, absolutely incredible book and I've not even finished it. Of course he puts his own spin on things and it's not entirely scientific but I guess there's always an aspect of pseudoscience when it comes to psychology. I agree that the reason we can maintain large groups may be because of our ability to fabricate agreed realities, seems extremely credible. Which theory do you lean towards the most when it comes to homo-sapines being the predominant species among other species of homo? I really need to finish reading it
"At home if you kill someone they arrest you. Here they give you a gun and show you what to do. I killed fifteen of those buggers. Now at home, they'd hang me. Here they'll give me a fucking medal." Eric Idle, 1st Zulu War Sketch, Monty Python's The Meaning Of Life
@@darkspeed62 Hey Freddie if you think that quote is ridiculous, this thread is way above your IQ, better to go back to the kids channels. What do you think conquerors did to the lands and the people they took? Do you think they bought them all ipads? History is written by the victors! Do you have any idea of the horrors conquerors did? Of course Hitler was a conqueror, luckily for us a short lived one. But I forget I need to lower the IQ of this conversation or your brain will melt. But as a tip, have a look at some history books. Believe it or not history goes further back than TV, in things called BOOKs, Ask your mummy to read one out loud for you... BTW Here is a definition " one who conquers : one who wins a country in war, subdues or subjugates a people" I think Hitler did that to a few countries?
Churchill: when you intentionally bomb civilian territory’s and wait an hour to do it again to nail soldiers who will be inevitably helping to save lives and extinguish flames and be remembered a “good guy”
@Liban Suleiman, Abel's sacrifice was a blood sacrifice, which foreshadows Christ's blood sacrifice on the cross. Cain's sacrifice lacked blood, which indicates his belief in man to be able to save himself. This is why Abel's sacrifice was accepted by God, and Cain's rejected. One is man-centered, and one is God-centered.
If you look at the Nazis from a logical point off view Jordan makes a lot off sense, but most people don't like that. People like to use there intuition hoping that logic isn't the truth. The death off intuition is the death of ego, only logic can prevail
I' ve always heard that in war there are two desired outcomes - One is peace, the other is victory and you have to try to figure out which one your opponent is after. If they just want to win at all cost you won't be able to negotiate or find a diplomatic resolution so you just have to try and win also. But this third option never occurred to me. Once he was loosing the war he wanted neither peace nor victory and he just wanted to cause as much chaos and suffering even if it meant loosing. It is quite obvious now that I think about it. He wasn't being strategic at all. So sad that all these ppl died because of a deranged man's massive ego.
your ignoring the multiple attempts the germans made to negotiate a "white peace" it was the drunken, chain smoking, obese, racist, warmongering churchill that wanted war on behalf of the soviet union the actual villains of the story
@@number1kenyan you are mistaking the goals of communism versus national socialism. There was about 8 or so attempts from the germans to make peace with European powers. Do you know what the commenterm is and what its goals were?
@@Gebrueder_Glatze Biblical figure, one of the sons of Adam. Out of jealousy he murdered his brother Abel, becoming the first person to kill another. Due to the ultimate senselessness of this act, he's also the first destroyer
@@Gebrueder_Glatze Cain, the biblical Cain could not bring God a offering the same as his brother Abel who did well. Out of jealousy he killed him. Because God favored Abel. Then lied to God about it when God asked him about it. Then had self-pity when God cursed him. So Cain is pretty much selfish, only interested in his own glory. Not savior material.
Other historians, thinkers, etc: "The reasons why the Nazis did what they did are vast and many." Jordan Peterson: "Yeah, but maybe they were also just plain evil."
Adolf Hitler* - it's illogical to say that the reason why the 'average nazi' did bad shit was because they were evil. Some of them, yes. Others, because they were too afraid to oppose, they liked being the superior race and chose to ignore immorality, or perhaps because they believed the shit that Hitler was spewing to hide his true intentions (according to this guy). I'm sure you know that already lol. Just wanted to put it out there.
@@emmachap1234 no...many in the German populationwere completely compliant and agreed with National Soc. Policies. Evil is in all hearts. You don't have to be a mass murderer to be evil, folks.
@@titianmom Which is actually what historians agree on today. History changed from the "the normal man did not know" narrative of the cold war to the "most accepted it and complied". And you can actually see that in some quite funny ways. For example libraries. If people buy Hitlers Mein Kampf the old "They bought it, to have it on the shelve!" excuse comes in very fast. But libraries lend them to you. Nobody put library books they lended up for show, especially since they are visibaily marked as library books. People lend those books to read them. So we got to assume that people who got those books from libraries read them and knew what Hitler planned. Turns out there were record highs in libraries lending out Hitlers Mein Kampf, so much that many libraries were short on the book and had to buy additional copies.
yelix2 not quite as good because if you could articulate your point of view that well you could probably convince anyone to donate one of their kidneys
With as many variables as there are in wars and nations I'm not sure it's always best to apply this historically. I'm not entirely sure I buy Hitler wanted to lose the war and kill himself honestly
@@Smoddo It´s more of a subconscious thing. Power is an addictive thing, and in broken people that embrace their own issues instead of facing them leads to self-destructive behaviour.
@@rayra2772 but Peterson is saying Hitler consciously decided to kill rather than enslave, thus his motivation is not winning the war and becoming the most powerful man in the world and conqueer Europe. I just don't get why everyone think that's a genius take Why could it not just as easily be incompetence of not being a good general, evil of wanting to kill people and jews in particular and a thirst to take over the entirety of Europe? Also Hitler could have declared war instantly against the major powers but tried to snatch up as much territory as possible. If chaos and not winning was the goal why play it like that? Or when they tried to make a secret peace with Britain? Why is it instead more likely he wanted to lose war for Germany And where does this outcome = motivation idea end. did Julius Caesar secretly wnat to be assassinated? Did China secretly want to be beaten by the Mongel empire? Did France and Netherlands hunger for German occupation?
@@Smoddo None of those things are mutually exclusive with each other. Let´s make a comparison: imagine winning the war is the equivalent of passing an important exam for a student; commiting to the mass genocide is the equivalent of procrastinating Maybe this specific student isn´t the brightest guy out there and therefore even if he tried hard to study, he would still have serious issues to pass the exam anyways (aka incompetence), but even if this was the case, I think it doesn´t take rocket science to realize that procrastination is a waste of time, and yet, a lot of people still do it. Not because they don´t want to pass the exam, but because deep inside they would like to be doing something else instead of studying. Now, extrapolate it to Hitler and WWII. Someone that gives deliberately more priority to procrastination than to passing the exam, maybe is someone that wants to do whatever they want to do and uses the excuse of making the exam so people don´t question him. Maybe this procrastinator could be deluded into his own lies, and he also believes he is trying to pass the exam when he isn´t, and that way he will be able to shut his own conscience when it starts questioning him too. Just don´t underestimate the capacity of people for self-deception, specially when they have power.
Its true, people preach now that we are gonna create some utopia where everyone treats eachother fairly and we will all take car of eachother. It'll never happen. And honestly todays world is the nicest humanity has ever been by far. But humans are awful. Its only a matter of time until we start to destroy.
@@GuyFromTheSouth I see where you're coming from, but I don't believe this is the nicest people have ever been. It seems to me that social skills have hit the bottom of the barrel
Exactly. I left a comment on one of his posts a few weeks ago that said I have a bunch of JBP Hail Lobster 🦞merch and despite my extreme disappointment in his behavior since ten/seven, I still have two giant posters up because I still need the “Clean your room” reminder bc I have ADHD and struggle with organization. But UNLIKE him, I *DON’T* need the “Tell the truth” reminder. He and Mikhaila are totally despicable.
This example also illustrates routine human interactions. Way too often some act offensively for no particular reason but this one - because they CAN. Excellent teacher.
Why is Donald Trump pretty and I am not? But why does he only have a wife but I have TWO HANDSOME GIRLFRIENDS who I show off in my masterpiece YT videos? Do you know the answer, dear vi
Im a high school graduate and tbh this was the thing i was expecting from college.. i swear to god online classes are so boring ...this looks fun and hoping that i can learn like this..
I guess it depends on your teachers, then. My History and English teacher was still amazingly interesting online. But yeah, I get it, irl is always better. I wish I could have had my first year "normally" as well. Will you get to go back to class this year?
It’s pretty gruesome when you have a class on ww1 and ww2 when you have a professor like this. Tbh they get some sort of intellectual joy from learning and reading and understanding suffering. Rather than a focus on the good and positive, it honestly can be psychologically exhausting. There’s a lot of evil in this world, and a lot of good to balance it out. Never forget that. It’s all fun and games until they keep going into detail about how the details of trench warfare and how whole piles of bodies were just left to decompose.
@@Djt4848 one of my high school teachers went into extreme, gruesome detail about the holocaust, I literally almost passed out, and years later it still haunts me
Theres a profound quote i found that sums the Hitler experience in a different way from what we see. While we all put him on a pedestal, the horrific side of it is actually that many people involved allowed him to imolement his morbid idea, no matter his motivation. "Hitler could do nothing without the cooperation, support and willing submission od millions of people." The astonishment is not that a Hitler came along but that many others went along. Edit: I appreciate all of yours understanding of my post and Im glad you're sharing your opinions and discussing it.
This is soft revisionism. It denies all of our extensive historical knowledge showing Hitler’s clear direct responsibility for, and direction of, the Holocaust. Why is this important? Because blame placed everywhere is blame placed nowhere.
@@scientifikx99 youre basically saying that instead of blaming everyone who is responsible, its best to pick one and just blame them. In doing so youre releasing thousands of others from their responsibility. Its liek having 5 people kill someone and they point finger at one of them saying "he made us do it". So now 4 of them runs free while only one is sentenced. Putting blame on other people is what is wrong with the society.
@@salimalbitar salim albitar That can be said for many people because we are very liable and easily manipulated to act a specific way eventho we think and feel differently. You can see that in examples of Isis and other terrorist org, Charles Manson and many other cults, Jim Jones and successfull Mass Suicides and so on. In all of this is obvious that one person holds the blame, yet thousands are involved. Making no action is action itself.
@@scientifikx99 the genocide side of it came much later on and that was from Hitler himself. But he got into power because of Versailles, the dire economic crisis and the lingering deep resentment from ww1 among the population.
On the contrary, I’d imagine his exams are a breeze considering how effective his teaching is. I actually had a professor of similar quality and I was able to pass with flying colors and never have to study once.
@@eMercody - Same, I had a few instructors that were so effective that their tests were amazingly easy. That is how it should be. I also had an instructor that gave good lectures but these never once aligned with the exams - ever.
@@Cecilia-ky3uw - I imagine so. My instructors expected us to work together on homework, study, and preparation for tests. The collective power between everyone helps to insure good scores, high spirits, less stress, and a more successful student. However, some students refused to take advantage of everyone working in groups and those were the ones to usually get bad grades. Another instructor would go through his material quickly. His class was limited to 3 hours per week and he had 6 hours of material to cover. His tests were pulled directly from his lectures and he would hint at would be on his test. Chances are not everyone was able to transcribe notes quickly enough so the expectation was for every student to come together and fill in the missing pieces to study. Those who did this always got good grades and those who didn't have difficulty passing the course. All the tools were made available, the student just had to learn to work with others and compile a complete note set to study in preparation.
And remember, a lot of people call this man a nazi. I see very few people more against totalitarian regimes than Peterson. When you study psychology, you learn to accept that humanity has a dark side, and what terrible deeds get done when it is cut loose.
He's definitely not a National Socialist. Just look at the pictures from inside his house. He has huge murals of Lenin and other Bolshevik revolutionaries covering the walls of almost every room of his house. That's why he does these nonsense "lectures" on AH that are nowhere close to the actual truth.
@@LetsAllDrinkToTheDeathOfAClown People like you are hilarious with your adorable little driveby arguments. Where can we have a look inside JP's house since that's all we have to do and it's so simple? I think it's safe to assume you're completely full of sh*t based on the second part of your ridiculous accusation.
@Ergorexestu he's just playing out the narrative we've all been taught. By the way, he did advocate for slavery. He's worse than Hitler is said to have been.
"The famous Lucius Cassius, whom the Roman people used to consider the most truthful and wisest judge, often used to say in evaluating cases “who stood to profit” [cui bono fuisset]." Now, it's just said as "Cui bono." (Except for Cher, who said "Cya Bono.")
Guys do not reply to @Right Left he gets fucking happiness in doing so. Just move on with your day he will go to hell when he dies and be able to meet his best friend hitler
According to his sister, Paula, Adolf Hitler was beaten nearly daily as a child by his alcoholic stepfather, Alois. On two occasions, Hitler was "left for dead" from these beatings, which sometimes ended in strangulation. He sustained nerve damage from a mustard gas attack during WWI, which left him blind in a military hospital for three days. He lost his platoon comrades during another attack, which he was lucky to survive, but which left him with "survivor's guilt." Like other frontline soldiers, he was given methamphetamines by the German army--it helps soldiers need less sleep--which he apparently continued to use throughout his lifetime, and he also developed a cocaine habit. (Cocaine was actually prescribed to him by one of his many weird doctors as a "treatment" for chronic daily headaches - a pressure in his head that left him "unable to think," quite possibly related to his repressed anger.) He was probably schizophrenic and almost certainly had Parkinson's Disease and was chronically sleep deprived. Not that the guy was a saint, mind you, but he was quite traumatized and obviously THOROUGHLY CLINICALLY INSANE... unlike tens of millions of people who obeyed his orders. Now that's a narrative we don't hear too often. Why? Because we like the idea of a lone, evil person being primarily responsible rather than something more complex and human and distributed that invites everyone to consider his or her own potential for horrific actions given the right set of circumstances. My mother is Jewish, fwiw, and I consider myself Jewish, too. I'm neither condoning Hitler, nor minimizing the absolute tragedy of WWII and the Holocaust, just suggesting we don't pin it all on one suffering lunatic bastard, which he obviously was, literally and figuratively.
This is actually quite significant with the trials that followed the end of the war. I am sure you have heard of these trials where people would often blame the higher ups and that they were just following orders. This excuse that they made of course is very well flawed, however that is just how it was quite often with these trials. So most of the blame was essentially shifted to Hitler, in addition to that the leader often becomes the one to take the blame or the fault when bad things occur. Hitler was just angry and bloody mad, so when the masses followed it just was crazy. Not many were very willing to do anything because they were scared of him. Honestly though the people who took the heinous orders of killing and torturing for him are responsible with the blood on their hands. They may have gotten the order, but it was their choice to obey. This is not to exempt Hitler though, he was just a bloody mad nut that wanted people to be forced into pain.
@@numbernumber25 An interesting thing I learned a bit about in psychology is that human obedience is crazy. There were experiments (Stanley Milgrim) and they were instructed to shock the person on the other side if they didn't memorize a long sheet of paper (as it was being said). Most people went up to the max amount of volts possible. There was no real physical harm done, and they weren't forced in the way you'd expect. They were politely told to continue shocking, and basically all of them did. It proves that under the right circumstances, majority of humanity would cave. The reason I bring that up is because this test was based off these people saying they were following orders. No excuses on their part, and I don't condone it a bit, but it's scary to think about. They do indeed have blood on their hands, and it's not a good thing.
@@psychott6 Agreed, I believe I heard of the experiment. I think there was several settings on the gauge of electricity box they could adjust, of course no one was actually getting hurt it was just a prop hooked to a audio player that would play a different voice message depending on the voltage setting. One of the most brilliant things about the experiment was the use of electricity and audio recordings. Prior to the ability to record audio, I do not believe the researchers could have designed an obedience and order experiment as good. But yeah you are correct that it does show that many would follow along to the situation and orders, however it still does not completely excuse them for their choices. It does though explain their choices which is very important, as it depicts that even if the person is not being threatened that they could still continue despite what they may consider to be concerning or bad. I believe that you make a good point though in terms of understanding what may have gone through the person's mindset with many of the soldiers. I say this specifically because using imaginations and thinking through situations can only go far before it either misses the result or takes a different path, so using an experiment to simulate a similar situation would grant people more insight to what the people were willing to do. But yeah it is just really unfortunate that we as humans are easy to bend to the will of someone else. In a position of a power dynamic things probably would push the person to be more obedient to commit acts which are just down right disgusting as being threatened will probably set in motion the person to focus on their life or the life of the person they are ordered to kill.
How easy it is to seduce "the masses" was shown only a very short period of time ago by the person in White House - before Biden... Promise silly people what they want to hear and almost everybody will switch off the brain and shout "hooray".... no, mankind is not a very good thing. The evil is in us. In everyone of us. And it needs a lot of work not to give in to it.
@@Freiya2011 Well I would say that having a person rant in grand speeches is probably a higher idea of speaking than just regular speeches. But yeah you are correct, one issue in particular is that when people are not liked very much they will often target a group of people and shift any blame towards them. This also works for when they just need to make someone look bad so they could justify the use of government power to show that they are doing something. This way people would not question as much on whether the person is actually doing their job since everyone's attention is on the group that the person is basically throwing crud at. This is probably one of the worst things to happen because it happens pretty often in history and is still present today
Exactly Look how good he’s at seeing the evilness of Hitler But not seeing the genocide that’s currently taking place in front of our eyes recorded with sound n video that those Palestinians are exterminated😢
Everytime I watch Mr Peterson, I feel like I walk away a little bit smarter, more informed and better equipped to understand others and myself, he’s the real deal.
Jordon Peterson has no understanding of the Holocaust or Hitler. He should open a book. He might be a good psychologist, but his understanding of history is wanting.
Saying he’s racist sounds like something a racist would say!!! Try starting your day for 1 year with the mentality that ….”everything I was taught was a lie” then use common sense examining the world around you and see if your opinion of your statement changes… Remember 🧔🏻♂️ didn’t build oxyclean in a day!
Not sure why this guy thinks that's why Hitler lost the war. However after studying WWII for the last 40 myself and having extensive knowledge on this subject, Hitler lost the war for one reason and one reason only. And that reason was he took on the Russians in the east, whilst fighting the allies in the west. Not enough manpower for both, and not being equipped for the eastern front with limited resources, and his men didn't have the correct equipment in the east. This last part cost Hitler's army to lose vast amounts of men, and what equipment they had, which accelerated the loss of the war. Having manpower in those concentration camps which was small in comparison to say an army, would not have been enough to cover both front's and those men and women did not have the equipment even if they had been sent to the front line. So this in utter nonsense. If it's one thing i do know it's my history on this war, and this war alone. I am also sure that this guy has not been looking over and studying this subject like i have for forty years or more. Hitler was not particularly evil himself. He didn't just wake up one day and think i know i will kill all these people in camps, no. His henchmen did that, they came to Hitler with these ideas and put them to him. Hitler put Germany back on track in the 1930's with rebuilding and putting people to work and giving them food, homes, jobs and a future to look forward too. However thing's went from bad to worse when the final solution was thought of, and Hitler wanted revenge for the loss of WW1. I do think even though the guy is giving a talk and has the title of a professor, he should go away and look at the real event's that took place, like Hitler not taking the correct advice from his generals when thing's needed a generals advice to be followed. These thing's cost Hitler the war. Not a few thousand men in camps. Worst thing of all here is, this guy is being listened too, and being paid for giving incorrect information, which distorts history in the teaching. God help us.
I had one of those guys as a history and societal teacher during the upper secondary school in Sweden - years of like 16 to 18. He had the same disposition - the vivid talent to make history with its actors and structure perspectives to come alive. He put much emphesis to the students´ ability to challange him with own analysis than to just repeat him or the books for higher grades. Happy times!
unfortunately, his version of history is not really the truth either, it just fit's his narrative. The Nazis did enslave the ones capable to work, they just did not spent any resources (e.g. food) on them and killed them once they were useless. Estimated 6-8 million people were forced into forced labor and for Jews and Synthi and Roma, the official strategy was "extermination through labor". Goebbels came up with this strategy and sold them to companies where they had a life expectancy of a couple month and the Reich made a lot of money from them. They even made a lot of money from the corpses. There are detailed cold blooded profitability analysis documents adding up profits of about 1500 Reichsmark and expenses like 2 Reichsmark for burning the corpse. So of course he wanted to win, he assumed he could turn the tide until basically hours before he died and then he assumed that they all betrayed him. Like Trump, every failure by himself or one of his goons was interpreted by him as a personal attack or betrayal (typical narcissist). That doesn't mean he didn't want to win.
@@vanivari359 It’s a good point though I do wonder if it wouldn’t be strictly more rational to feed their working slaves just enough for them to continue working? Just expand into more camps and factories as you round more and more up. It’s incredibly cheap labor after all.
He isn't intelligent at all, he just uses fancy words here and there and says a whole bunch of fancy nothings to seem smart while silently putting his agenda in.
@@Eggdine Yeah I really informed myself last summer and I already see how many people are also starting to see it. I don't know how long you have been knowing all this but I cannot imagine how difficult it must have been for you if you have been knowing this for say 10 years.
No dispute. No argument. But I believe intentionally slaughtering people is a minute difference then changing a culture and not caring if people died because of it. Neither were up for Nobel pace prizes and I would say they are different levels of evil
imagine it just turns out he's Hitler reincarnated telling us how he should've done things in the first place. joking aside this guy makes history even more fun, reminds me of the passion my history teacher had.
@@Project_Algiz Sir, you're being deceived by neo-nazis, Zundel based his claims on the Leuchter report, a report that was debunked by polish scientist. You want the truth? You can read reports from the SS itself where the plans for the genocide were written, that way you can stop spreading false claims and denying the truth
Reminds me of my 11th grade History teacher Ms. Quarles. Just like him, she always had a way with teaching and making me want to learn more. Pure educators.
@@Vader4499 He makes it seem as if Adolf Hitler was a genocidal maniac and his SS were a group of sadistic thugs. Nothing could be further from the truth and is a complete distortion of reality. The rabbit hole is deep my friend
“If you can’t figure out what is the motivation of someone, look at the outcome, and infer the motivation... Matthew 16 - Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? ...A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. ...Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
False. Only just looking at the outcome puts the burden solely on what it ended in. If the confederacy won the civil war then the motivation of the conflict was to preserve slavery.
@@Ajourneyofknowing The motivation of the conflict was to preserve slavery. That was succinctly stated by the leaders of the confederacy who felt aggrieved by Lincoln's victory in 1860.
These lectures are priceless. We wont ever get a lesson from him personally but perhaps RUclips is an amazing platform for we can still know how he practiced.
Are you kidding? This is trash, his entire argument hinges on the painter being an objectively evil person, and the ‘caust’s having happened. I understand that these two things are gospel these days, but it doesnt lend to the logic of his argument.
Wrong, JP does have his biases. His ideas are heavily influenced by his traditional christian background which makes his lessons on marriage, dating and family in the modern day a possible death sentence, especially if you're male. His reasons for why people marry are dead wrong, his dating advice doesn't take human nature into account, and his views on family are hopelessly idealistic. Don't get me wrong, JP does have good advice, but not all of it.
@@kaptinbarfbeerd1317 Well I'm sure everyone has their own biases/leanings according to their respective backgrounds, how does that make him any less objective compared to the average modern thinker.
@@elijahhartman5799 If the conclusions JP talks about come from his traditional christian background, they are biased by definition. I'll give you an example. JP says (and I'm paraphrasing here) that women who don't want to be mothers are messed in the head. He does not take into account there are women out there who regret becoming mothers. Some women remember their parents being miserable and they don't want to be the same. Some forgo family for financial reasons. Or the women who feel like indentured slaves being housewives. Or that there are women out there who would rather use their time for other pursuits. Or the countless women who regret marrying their husbands. He doesn't address these issues either, he just reverts to the traditional female gender role as the way things should be while those who don't fit that definition are brushed off as a minority without evidence. I'm not sure what the numbers are either but I have seen surveys were a majority of women regret marrying their husbands. If his traditional christian worldview wasn't holding him back, I'm sure he could come to a different conclusion.
Maybe Hitler was really pissed off after they kicked him out of art school. I've heard something to the tune of, "If the village is cold to the child, the child will burn the village to the ground to feel the warmth."
That argument holds no water in my case. It made me want to make sure I never did the same to anyone else. My success is in spite of a number of things.
Some of em just waiting for an excuse to let go on the world, even though that won’t even fill the hole in his soul, or if he has no soul or was metaphorically a man that looks at his self as a saint for the Germans on earth... to young and overzealous men ready to prove themselves, that’s tempting.. but he musta been a helluva talker cuz it would take some just over the top rants and just got down on it .. it was something I have studied in depth.... but the mans still satan because he couldn’t fill the hole
@leonard mathes Exaclty. Plus Peterson is wrong here - the Nazis absolutely used the Jews as slave labor. Most of them died of starvation brought on by allied bombing of supply chains, or typhus.
@Dane Griffard I haven't seen Peterson ever use the word holocaust... Or explain the role of rabid antisemitism in explaining the Holocaust. Do you have any links?
@@thanezollman5269 Hitler hastened the extermination because the wermarcht was facing a food shortage and they didn't want to feed prisoners anymore near the end of the war. It is well documented, it has nothing to do with maximizing chaos. Jordan is plain wrong here. As a big history buff, this drives me nuts.
“If you can’t figure out what someone’s doing or why, look at the outcome, and infer the motivation.” Wow. Crazy how much I align with this level of thinking. Great piece here, loved it.
Yes, Peterson just described himself. Why do you think he has a thousand YT videos? He's getting filthy rich by promoting political confrontation. Suckers!
Inference is the enemy of reason. This may the single most ill-advised quip Peterson has ever contrived. I suggest, if you can't figure out what someone is doing -- ask them. Injecting yet another layer of your own psychosis onto another's actions as a means to rationalize it is a display of narcissism.
This right here is why Jordan Peterson is a disgusting shill. Totally wrong view about everything relating to WW2. Go back on your antidepressants, Jordy. Nobody wants to hear your hot takes on history.
@@Peter-qe1yh wdym hitler did mass murder Jews when he was losing the war the questions why you think obviously he just accepted his fate and decided to take them out with him but I doubt it was simply because of hate I think he genuinely thought that in the long run exterminating the Jewish population would be more beneficial to his country then saving the lives of the soldiers by giving up in their final stand
Stalin was equally or even more worse than Hitler but it makes 0 sense to bring his name up in this conversation right now unless you’re trying to play H. actions down
You just missed the point of this video. In the case of Hitler, him killing Jews was more of an end rather than means to an end. In the case of Stalin, the gulags were the means to reach his end (building socialism in short time). This makes Hitler more evil because during the end of the war he allocated a significant portion of his resources in eliminating the Jews instead of focusing on the war effort.
@@timokohler6631 there is a Hitler in all of us, in me and in you. The world likes to hate Hitler as though they are so different. You haven’t looked deep enough inside yourself
Honestly, if teachers would have been like him, I think us students would have no problem making studying one of our hobbies, rather than fearing the subject and just mugging them up to get marks
Progressive Leftists (and yes, the supposed politicians in their supposed opposition) don't want an educated, free-thinking populace; they want mindless drones which are easily whipped up into mob frenzy.
for real! I never did good in school and always had trouble focusing while in class but at home I'd be nose deep in books about the subject if it was interesting to me. Teachers need have knowlegde on the subject but also and maybe even more importantly about the art of teaching itself and present the subject in an interesting way
This was an interesting perspective on Hitler's motivations - Hitler simply destroyed because his intention was to destroy rather than win a war and create some reich etc. But it assumes that Hitler was rational to some degree. It made me think of the current situation with Erdogan in Turkey, the man who thinks that reducing interest rates is the way to fight inflation. If he destroys the Turkish economy is that because his actual intention is to destroy it.
As someone who fled Turkey because of this becoming increasingly clear, I believe you are 100% correct. With Turkeys previous rulers leaving them in dire condition, all the citizens treated Erdogan and his party like Gods, pretty damn similar to Germany during this era. Even today with the increasingly horrible economy in Turkey people still worship the man and this video made me rethink if his intention really was to bring Turkey back to power, especially since him and his party are basically the only people benefitting from the mayhem...
The entire world is destroying the financial system on purpose. Crypto is slowly being adopted. The pandemic is partly real but mostly being used as a cover up.
And the people blindly following his ideas, almost even glorifying him as if he were a holy figure, are in the majority too. Kind of scary to think whether or not my home country will survive in his hands.
I can understand this argument, but my problem is that it’s fine to do this analysis on a single person, or even a group of like mined people, but the Nazi war machine was a vast organisation involving many different people from many different backgrounds and this includes the entire structure behind the concentration camps. How can we assume everyone involved was just doing it to create mayhem through an evil in the psyche? There was definitely more behind it than just that, the argument he puts forward is just as much an underestimation as the argument that it’s over natural resources. Hitler himself didn’t pass any specific instructions of what to do, it’s well known that it was those trying to impress him to further their own careers that interpreted his mumbo jumbo into an evil killing machine, and they weren’t all the same. Himmler, Heidrich, Mengele etc were evil individuals without a doubt, but they all had different motives.
your argument is valid, however we need to see that this is a 4ish minute snippet of what was most defiantly a much larger discussion/lesson. we dont see the very beginning of what he was talking about that lead to this.
Jordan is talking about looking at someone's actions and you'll find out his/her motivations. The nazi example is a little bit harsh but it conveys the mesage that actions follos thoughts
I think it is important that he’s referring to Hitler specifically and not all of Nazis. Because he’s talking about his motivation. The Nazis themselves are a mixed bag of motivations. Some of which is to serve their inspiring idol seen in Hitler. Meaning that for them they may have actually believed what they were doing was for some sort of cause. Others opened their eyes and regret what they did. Some were just as evil as him.
What do you mean by „the gas chambers can’t be located”? Are you proactively ignoring evidence and still standing gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau or Stutthof (just to name two) or are you clinically retarded? Nazis would probably put you in a gas chamber too with that kind of backwards thinking and medically not so sane mind
@@luizmarinho6138 maybe. But he has said before he does it because he is speaking TO each of them - that doesn't necessarily mean he is doing it to make sure they're paying attention
The whole time Dr. Peterson’s right hand was in his right jacket pocket I though he was going to pull out a deck of cards and perform a magic trick. I enjoyed part of the lecture as well.
This assumes that one can desire one outcome while producing another out of ignorance or false ideals. It seems to me to be perfectly coherent that Hitler simply believed false things that he thought would produce the effects he desired but in fact produced the reverse. So as things got worse he simply pushed the accelerator to the floor on his ideals which he thought would fix the problem but in fact was only accelerating the outcomes that were the opposite of what he wanted. False ideals sincerely believed.
Exactly. Peterson seems unwilling to grasp the obvious, that it's common for people to make decisions that cause disastrous outcomes they never intended or wanted, at any level, not even "deep down." Especially crackpots with elaborate false beliefs, because those are wildly out of kilter with reality.
I made a criticism of Peterson's delivery on this video. Your analysis provided a much more clear picture of his overall point. Thank you for the clarity and perhaps you may help Peterson speak to the masses in a more coherent way without such ambiguous delivery.
@D Sullivan well you would start a war to win, but when you're losing, your strategy should change as conditions change. Devoting resources to commit genocide during a war is wasteful and not conducive to winning. The fact that Hitler accelerated the rate at which they were killing Jews and POWs suggest that he didn't plan to do such after the war and that suggests that he had the knowledge that he already lost the war.
I would suggest you all take a look at the overall point here instead of trying to sound intelligent. His point is that some people don't have a "logical" reason for their actions. Mental illness like psychopathy or schizophrenia aren't brand new we are just more aware of them. His point is that it doesn't mean someone with one of those mental illnesses is less or more clever or successful, you're just judging by the wrong metrics. He's absolutely correct in that Hitler's approach to "the war" was not in any way predicated on winning. His actions don't make sense to you and me because they are only meant to make sense to him. Thusly he presents the psychological concept that if you can't glean a rational motivation from the person look at the outcome.
I’m glad he wasn’t my high school history teacher. I remember how I was how I took all my teachers for granted. We all say “I wish I had him in HS” but do you really? Would you even know he’s someone you better appreciate? Naw, I like being able to look him up in my 30s and get a refresher from him
@@GabrielBear I’m a HS strength and conditioning coach so I’m required to teach a subject too. I teach chemistry and I try to make everything as hands on as I can. Mixing all kinds of things together for the wow factor, blowing up tannerite in the parking lot, I try to make sure every day we do something. I hate being the teacher that puts on a video and cures their hangover.
The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' - this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats. --- Aldous Huxley
@@geronimostanding5145: He's referencing the biblical account recorded in chapter 4 of Genesis which tells of the two brothers "Cain" and "Abel," Cain being the one who murdered his brother out of jealousy and spite.
If you enjoy Dr. Peterson's lectures you may be interested to know that his self narrated audiobooks “12 Rules for Life” amzn.to/2ipaBnQ (US) / amzn.to/2kpdXv9 (UK) / amzn.to/2jTRq67 (CA) and "Beyond Order" amzn.to/31EgIhP (US) / amzn.to/3wyochN (UK) / amzn.to/3EXzGON (CA) are currently available FOR FREE with the Amazon Audible trial program!
The above are Amazon affiliate links.
You sir talk out your arse more than anything. You are going to say people do not fight over resources when the native people fought the US government over that. As a matter of fact the US government tried to starve the native people by exterminating the buffalo. You are full of shit sir. Ive lived long enough to know people will fight over resources so have you. I found your analogy about hitler disturbing. You going to give him some advice how to win the war then exterminate...what giving your white supremist ideas...because that about all that listen you. Nothing about unity, self sacrifice for your country and others or equality because you do not believe in those. You are toxic when i look at you i can see right straight through you. You are so dead inside. If in your position you have made enough money from your book... leave the united state go sit with the Dhal Lama and learn how to feel....because you cant. Laugh at me call me ignorant if you want...I've worked in the worst places you can't imagine seen the faces of people. i have seen and heard and felt the faces of people and im telling you Ive seen yours a thousand times from inmates.
Because bullshit propaganda
@@My2CentsYall What a hateful fool you are -- blind to your own shortcomings, which undoubtedly are many.
@@nemanjacabarkapalordozunu So are you.
Which came first? Nazi or Marxist? Which is the best system? You're talking about WWII without explaining The Great War? Men who fought in the trench's of WWI saw the horror that you or I could never understand or imagine. Even today, historians are still baffled about WWI. Historians agree that the Treaty of Versailles would've forced Germany into another war. Why would Germany, Italy and Japan form an Axis? What was their purpose? Their goal? Is it possible the 3 countries wanted to nip communist Joe Stalin, Mao Zedong in the bud. Camps became "death" camps when the allies starved who ever existed in the camps. Just wish the professor would use some common sense.
I love how his vocabulary is almost endless he doesn't stutter or struggle to find the right word to fill in the sentence, people like this are so interesting to talk to
reminds me of my dad who is also a professor. He never even had to prepare a lecture, just walked up and GO. Drove my mom crazy in college, she had to study her butt off and he just walked in and aced all the classes.
Except in this clip he literally DID pause to come up with the right word to fill in the sentence.. 🤦🏻♂️
@@Sheriff_K He speaks pretty consistently *for the most part.* He’s still human, no need to take OP’s comment so literally.
He does wait to find the right word. And sometimes he struggles to.
He's undeniably interesting without pretending he has these foibles.
😂😂😂 I love it ... Live long enough for the common man to think having a regular understanding of history an psychology like really ... God we are a dumb ppl this man is giving you an 8 out of 10 cliff notes of what the real philosophers thought up ... Sad really
He's the type of professor where you won't say a WORD in his class. Undivided attention and respect
I would, why be a creep. He’s no God. He’s a human a victim, as You and me, of the insane.
@@writerpaperback6284 The Fuck⁉️
Complete and utter bullshit. Ive had female professors more exciting than this milquetoast self appointed judge worshiped by troglodytes like you
@@user24350 k buddy
@@writerpaperback6284 wow your projecting hard , go get help please
“If you can’t figure out the motive, look at the outcome and infer” I challenge everyone to filter American politics through this lens and see what you find
Good old days when this used to be common sense
It shouldn't be used exclusively. As he said, it's just a tool in your analytical arsenal. You CAN infer, but that doesn't actually prove anything, especially in the presence of substantial auxiliary information.
I'm going to say decision for the sake of petty power grabs. It's not really organized enough to really be otherwise
@Seen not Heard “kindest empire the earth has ever seen” 😬🤣🤣🤣 k bud, just the juxtaposition of kind and empire is funny enough, but your delusion that we actually do good in other countries is hilarious
@Seen not Heard Kindest? To who? Its like you slept through US history and never bothered to read a book or watch so much as the local news.
There's a book called Windswept Lies of War, and it talks from censored history and hidden secrets to lost files and classified documents about World War II, it's the real deal.
Thanks for the recommendation. Looking it up now. 😊
Thanks
POV: You were recommended this 4 year old video and are looking through the pointless political fights in the comments realizing they're only a couple days old
Sums up what I'm currently experiencing right now. Nice POV
Yes
You and I, are the same
fax!
Damn you
""The death of one man is a tragedy, the deaths of millions are a statistic."" -- Josef Stalin.
What a hypocrite was Stalin then.
@@damienbrekke2574 ikr
@@damienbrekke2574 facts
@Jimmy Falk "Hitler was a Rotchschild" Really? illustrate me. Put a quote, link or somth.
@@damienbrekke2574 what do expect from a Marxist Satanist?
reminds of the quote - “some men just want to watch the world burn”
Amen
What ghat from?
Gandhi said that
@@luthfirmansyahalbar3868 pff no gandhi got that from alfred in batman a dark knight
@@jacobdoolan4978 Batman Dark Knight alfred said it
Hitler killed his victims like a Bond villain would. He wasted time and effort tattooing them, transporting them, cataloging them, clothing them, housing them and then, of course, gassing them. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were rather more efficient monsters.
Except he didn’t do anything of that lol
@@ehrjeo65 denial. :D
@@LunarOverdrive brainwashed sheep :D
@@ehrjeo65 correct, hitler wouldnt sign off on the slaughter, himmler took the problem into his own hands.
if the nazis hadn't killed the jews , we'd be reviewing him with envious eyes in regards to how a leader fights for the national state of its people.
never thought id print such words, but the evidence is becoming very clear as one once said , we fought the wrong enemy.
Nope.
"Some people just want to watch the world burn."
Never forget that.
Just read MK dude, not what they wanted
I dont think he wanted mayhem per se, he was blinded and bound by his own ideology
Ricky Weeks Sociopaths don’t lack empathy. Psychopaths do. I can say that as a sociopath.
@@mism847 then you're not a sociopath; sociopaths lack empathy but are unlike psychopaths who also have an urge to cause suffering, especially physical pain. Only, I don't know why everyone here is talking about this, as if Adolf was either of the two. Loving your people at the expense of who you perceive to be your enemies is the way all great men of old felt and acted for (even Jesus Christ)... unlike our "leaders" today, who love not their people.
Some men don't care if it burns as long as they're not called nazis as much.
So stfu.
The only way today's college tuition rates could possibly be justified is if you had a professor like this teaching every single class.
I would pay just to have a seat near him when he does his thing
A junkie trying to help Hitler win would prepare you for what exactly? This has no value.
@@evanclealand9231 Hitler is dead.
@@hubbabubba2298 tell that to the junkie hack you worship.
@@evanclealand9231 I think he knows, since he is speaking of him in past tense.
Psychology adds a great element to the study of Historical Thinking.
I remember in secondary school…
Having to do a presentation on ‘who’s the greatest person who ever lived’ and we chose who it was, I’ll keep my reply super short. In a small group we chose who is who, and me being the disliked outcast no one wanted on their team because I generally looked down upon how…. “Simple” people were, (Yeah, Arrogant, but I was bored waiting for them to grow up whilst they were being kids.) For instance, dating, petty childhood gossip and generally poor decisions made against me specifically, like I was bullied a fair bit. That’s just a reflection upon myself at the time. I’m prepared to have ‘that discussion’ with you or anyone else back then, it’s just no one was at that level especially with me.
When I got the task of, :”Chosing the greatest person who ever lived within my opinion” - Well… I chose my friend. Well, I say friend, I only knew her for months, I didn’t know her for long, and due to memory loss (Undiagnosed, but I suspect it) I only remember fragments of our time together, granted, we were kids. Not everyone can remember every day they ever lived.
She saved my life physically, it’s my belief of the fragments I remember she pushed me out the way of a car that then hit her. At the time and for a few years, I never knew what happened to her, I had to live with some kind of hope she was out there somewhere. I spoke to an old teacher and she told me, my friend (Who for all intends and purposes, wasn’t entirely viewed as a friend to me at the time, hence why I am sceptical on saying the word “friend” ) The teacher told me, she (my friend) was taken to hospital, the people from her home (It was a foster home) stayed with her and she died in hospital.
I grew up wondering why she saved me, why did she do that? As I think anyone would do.
Perhaps it was just, She couldn’t bare the thought in that moment her only friend (Maybe? closest? She didn’t have many friends in the memories or brief bits I remember).
I was told I am NOT allowed to chose my friend, for the greatest person who ever lived. Even if they gave their life to put me in that room. Which is BS that a OPEN ended question like that can be rejected when it doesn’t meet some criteria within a syllabus for marking. If your to do a presentation, it should be on the quality of the presentation, NOT the choice of what the subject is.
Instead I was forced into chosing Churchill, Which, History, especially in the UK schools (I started 2001-2012 from year 1, to end of year 11 GCSEs,) Germany and hitler was painted pretty negatively with Churchill painted as the hero we needed in our darkest hour.
I don’t know how real or true it is and to what extent. According to a vocal conversation I had with someone (I believe it was family*) Churchill actually locked up the disabled and the disadvantaged people mentally. For instance, say learning difficulty (Autism for instance) and those who physically can’t do something. I’m not that big on history, but whenever a historical piece (Or inspired time setting) within a show comes up, say, Torchwood, Doctor Who, for instance. I always appreciate it when they show it “As it was” and not just gloss over some of the really cruel harsh elements. Like, there was an episode of Torchwood, where a WW2 soldier got displaced in time, and on some day he will go back in time to close a rift in space-time. Cool,
They outright note, once he goes back, he’s not just gonna get the rest of his life there, He’s going to go back from the hospital he was in, where he was treated for his wounds from the front line. He was gonna get sent back to the front, he will suffer from shell shock, he will become paralysed and he’s going to get shot by his own team because he directly* can’t continue fighting.
In some respects, Churchill and the British, were actually “not so clean” with the British empire for example.
I honestly feel in my own opinion, Churchill, that was I told I have to chose, isn’t a clear-cut choice. He may have been the man at the for-front telling us what to believe within. However, he has his own dark elements.
My choice, I’m Biased. I maybe entirely wrong within my presumption and how I’ve dealt with the trauma. So I’ll end with this quote from doctor who.
“Good is good in the final hour, within the deepest pit, Without hope, Without witness, Without reward”
@@stasisasmr7724 as a history teacher myself, that is frustrating to me. I also give a lot of open ended and subjective questions to my students. You have to accept that students will not all to in the direction you want. Obviously, for you the most important person is the one who saved your life.
As to the culpability of Churchill and England, there are several ways to frame it. Culturally, they weren't much different from any other country at the time in regards to mental health. Science ans understanding was not where it is today.
@Maske002 of course, I 100% get that, times have changed,
My main thought (which I’m far far from knowing the full picture, and the full picture may paint a different opinion for myself.)
But when you look at what England was doing, I get the impression we were being slightly brainwashed to ‘not be’ the bad guys. Within the idea, we by definition invaded countries and occupied them to create the British empire.
Which… Granted, Hitler broke every treaty he signed forbidding him from invading country after country.
Sure. That’s bad. But on the surface level, I get the impression it could have been very different providing you consider the British empire as a threat to the rest of the world.
It’s an interesting thought, and whilst we just have history to look back on. Not the men and women who can give and portray a proper full account of it, genuinely I infer it more than suggest it, because everyone who once tried conquering the earth, started small and worked upwards.
Whether it be for some unique belief and was intended for good rather than evil. Or the evil dictator who wanted total control over everywhere.
Just on that presentation I once had to give (that I didn’t end up doing) I honestly see zero reason why it could have been either, greatest or worst person by history books.
Providing your giving that argument which is what it was, a one sided argument. That would be clearer and allowed that choice to be present. Whilst containing it within the idea of someone past who people probably have heard of already.
I also (it’s obvious and doesn’t need saying) the word great and worst is depending on which side you stand on,
My argument in a hyperthetical brass tacks sense was. This is who you didn’t hear of. Who isn’t some big position, with high stakes controlling the nation to protect us or whatever.
Just a person. You could always have someone who tries doing the right thing and is viewed as a overall good person with a decent heart*
But not be remembered for that good attempt*
Or someone like my friend who only ever managed to do one thing that you (I mean it politely) could say was a big thing. That had some impact and that’s all it was. But that one impact put me here,
It gave me the potential I should say to be here, and if I go onto get past the PTSD, the loss of them, and any and all feelings of doubt and regret, but I put every person I ever meet before myself,
Maybe one day, I might, in some way, make that same impact over the chance of years, and to many people. I may go every day singing her praises. And I’d happily give her the credit for it.
That’s why she’s a better fit than others. Because I can say she didn’t benefit from what she gave. Quite the opposite, and with a fair few people we learned about in history (mainly wars, the plague, and a tiny bit of foreign history but not really)
They all were figures that weren’t (to my opinion) ever explained properly to us,
Like for instance Churchill was, Priminister, he gave that one speech and kept the countries spirits going despite nightly bombing… I mean it with no disrespect, history can’t just be taught within a 60 minute lesson,
As someone with autism, I do find it hard sometimes to grasp the emotional side as well,
(A little off topic) I do like those analytical videos that explain what is in a scene of say a TV/movie, and I may know all the lines for that episode for example*
But I never grasped the idea of the not subtle message of say, this character lost someone they cared about, and suddenly gets put in a room where they have to deal with the aftermath, and following hints they are understanding,
Suddenly they get told the next hint is buried underground, and so… they (metaphorically) are digging their own grave,
So, I don’t know, maybe I never paid attention to history, but applied context is critical to understanding it especially with autism,
God bless RUclips for that!
the problem is that the governments dont want ppl this smart or at least they dont want us to start thinking about many topics
Especially in relation to the Nazi's. The fact they were able to indoctrinate Germans is fascinating.
What kind of books was he burning?
We all know that one, who owns the porn sites right now?
Pornographic books. As a child I was lead to believe he burned Jewish books to destroy any sense of their identities or something. Bro literally burned porn mags.
@@Meatriderphobic those are apart of the Jewish identity, same with transgender books
this guys makes history so enjoyable, wish he was my teacher in HS LOL
His genius would then be grossly underpaid if he taught in HS LOL
and the remarkable thing is, he's not teaching history.
@@X22-p4t "No, I am not a bot and this is not a virus"
_posts suspicious link_
A high school teacher is literally like a high school kid compared to this guy. The way he speaks is just amazing. Genius level IQ. My history teacher just handed out packets for us to fill out while on his laptop 😂
Also I've met you before in Austin. On 6th street. Hope you're doing good. Ur actually cool in real life.
Wish this guy was my teacher when I was in school. He actually cares about what he’s saying and talking about. Not just memorising a pre written lecture
Most people who say that wouldn’t have actually cared in school. Multiple teachers are like this if you actually pay attention. Then again, I’m biased because the majority of students are complete retards.
Or you are just one of those people that make too much excuses
The thing that makes it so great is he puts real world relavence and pychology into it so we as the students can actually see the purpose of history in our learning. THATS what makes him a great teacher. Wish more teachers did this tho :(
Iv read and studied Hitler j p is way of the mark about him keep believing his rubbish with no proof
@@ausername1972 Well I said it as a general statement. I didn’t go to an English speaking Secondary School so I wouldn’t know 🤷♂️
"You can suspend your unnecessary demolition of people, win the damn war and pick it up afterwards."
this is gold right here folks
It shows how petty hitler really was he didn’t care about the war as much as killing the Jews
Yes. We heard him say it
Jordan just skips the fact that the expulsion of Jews in Germany started years before the war started. And many of them were in forced labor during the war, for example in the arms industry. What one should realize is that this was a process of 12 years, put into 4 minutes by Jordan.
@Wise Acres gang stalked?
@Wise Acres "metal health". Daily dose of cradle of filth
The diffirence between newest and top comments brings me back hope about humanity
Prof: “Any questions?”
Student: “What’s in your right pocket?!?”
Hahahahahaha
i think it is the remote for the presentation
So he gets himself so worked up in his lectures that he gives himself a boner?
The "One Ring to Rule Them All" .....
I believe he once said it was a "pocket pussy"
F@$king love the way he looks each student in the eye as he moves around. Stare in to their soul while discussing genocide
“That’s enough! You guys are talking about my species. We understand genocide. We do it sometime.” - Jerry Smith
It's coming quicker than anyone thinks in America.
Conspiracy theories aren't theory anymore.
I haven't gone down every rabbit hole looking for the truth, but I damn sure don't watch the tell-lie-vision.
This man is willing to dig up unresolved issues like genocide without fear of the censors reprisal. He has reached prophet status in my humble uneducated opinion.
We need a lot of wise men and women who are willing to discuss hard to discuss topics and without censorship put all arguement out on the table in the wide open. Stop the secrecy and the narcissistic abuse of entire nations.
Everyone in America is suffering from being gaslit at this moment.
LMFAO!
Theres a genocide happening now in brazil and no one gives a fuck
@@erikjunior599 ?
I like this guy. I don't know why he gets so much hate. He is an unbiased professional analyst, theorist and teacher. This is what they do. They don't take sides, they don't approve or disapprove. Their job is to analyze and theorize and educate. I see no racism or sexism or anything else. Just a brilliant guy being brilliant.
Arkeeny that is why he is distrusted by the elites ,he's speaks the truth
EXACTLY!!!! Well said!!!
The reason is that his brilliance shows all the more clearly the idiocy of the haters. Envy can cause hate.
He's not an unintelligent man when he sticks to his area of specialty, Clinical Psychology. He's certainly not a 1st-rate thinker when he ventures outside his area, especially when he talks about history, politics, Marxism, Secular Humanism, atheism, Global Warming, etc., and frankly he's an embarrassment. If you've seen his debate with Matt Dillahunty, then you'll understand why. His lecture above was not a brilliant analysis because his logic and assumptions were weak and full of holes, too many to mention here.
I don't dislike the man, and if he's helped young men and women lead better lives, then I applaud him in that area.
James Anthony ...may I respectfully ask what is your speciality ?
What about his 5-9 peace offers to Britain to end the war?
Titus wasn’t Emperor in 70 AD, Vespasian was you fucking retard
He offered peace after realizing UK had their own Lutfwaffe named Royal Air Force and they werent giving up at any point :D
But there wasnt timid Chamberlain in front of him there was one of the most cunning or evil you can say man in history, Churchill, who doesnt F around when it comes to British interests.
@ absolutely wrong. He offered peace way before then. There are 9 peace offers documented. He wrote and repeatedly said he wanted a strong British empire. Instead, Churchill destroyed it.
@Emperor-Titus70AD IDK it might be true but if I was British Empire I wouldnt want a continental power thats why they beat Napoleon by gathering every single country in Europe. It's a duty of a British bureaucrat to think like that its not right or wrong. On the other hand Germany wants to get more natural resources because they are strong but they couldnt capitalize on Africa and other places as they are nearly landlocked. So I get everyside WW2 happened 4-5 times on smaller scale throughout 1600-1945. European shit nothing to see
@Emperor-Titus70ADpeace offer only to Brit’s. He didn’t want to fight the Brit’s but the Brit’s wouldn’t stand for his European expansion. So it’s disingenuous to write that he made several peace offerings.
"If it produces mayhem, perhaps it was aiming at mayhem." Wholly relevant to today's events I believe
Wait what happened today?
There is no such thing as an orderly withdrawal from a country that supports the Taliban. We should’ve never even gone there.
Read the shock doctrine. Nothing like a crisis for making profits and controlling a subservient population
Exactly what I thought when I heard him say that
+1
Definitely feel like history & psychology should be taught intertwined together bc yeah, we need to know history to not repeat it but factoring in our human behaviors could help us understand why & how things of the past took place so we *actually* don’t repeat it.
Absolutely couldn't agree more. Just like everything else in reality, psychology is the understanding of any event involving humans. History is no different. Knowing History (what happened) is fine. Pondering the psychology (why it happened) is so much more valuable to us as society, and creating progress.
This is why I love Yuval Noah Hararri’s ‘Sapiens’ so much. It takes human history and analyzes the events from a psychological perspective, talking about development and technology in a whole new way.
Just don't kill a bunch of people. They did it in the past and it was bad. There, now we are in a utopian society where war doesn't exist. I want my Nobel Peace Prize now.
I see what you're saying and I agree we should not just study the event but the reasons for said event. They already are intertwined in a way though, all history has an aspect of psychology because it's all written by people with subjective views of the world and their experiences
@@frankie9772 Never seen anyone else mention this book on the internet but I guess we are in the intellectual corner of youtube, absolutely incredible book and I've not even finished it. Of course he puts his own spin on things and it's not entirely scientific but I guess there's always an aspect of pseudoscience when it comes to psychology. I agree that the reason we can maintain large groups may be because of our ability to fabricate agreed realities, seems extremely credible. Which theory do you lean towards the most when it comes to homo-sapines being the predominant species among other species of homo? I really need to finish reading it
"Kill one man, and you are a murderer. Kill millions of men, and you are a conqueror" - Jean Rostand
"At home if you kill someone they arrest you. Here they give you a gun and show you what to do. I killed fifteen of those buggers. Now at home, they'd hang me. Here they'll give me a fucking medal."
Eric Idle, 1st Zulu War Sketch, Monty Python's The Meaning Of Life
Cool
How is that ridiculous quote in any way applicable to this video? Nobody thinks Hitler was a conqueror.
@@darkspeed62 Hey Freddie if you think that quote is ridiculous, this thread is way above your IQ, better to go back to the kids channels. What do you think conquerors did to the lands and the people they took? Do you think they bought them all ipads? History is written by the victors! Do you have any idea of the horrors conquerors did? Of course Hitler was a conqueror, luckily for us a short lived one. But I forget I need to lower the IQ of this conversation or your brain will melt. But as a tip, have a look at some history books. Believe it or not history goes further back than TV, in things called BOOKs, Ask your mummy to read one out loud for you...
BTW Here is a definition " one who conquers : one who wins a country in war, subdues or subjugates a people" I think Hitler did that to a few countries?
@@darkspeed62 except the world does. minus you, apparently.
We forget what a great teacher JP is.
stallin: when you kill more people but still don`t get recognized
MD who was that Chinese guy with the much larger K:D again?
James Bond Mao gay dong
MD probably because the US was allied with him during WW2.
Churchill: when you intentionally bomb civilian territory’s and wait an hour to do it again to nail soldiers who will be inevitably helping to save lives and extinguish flames and be remembered a “good guy”
Hakka So we were allied with the guy who's been friends with Hitler? That makes things worse.
Man, imagine trying to date his daughter. LOL.
Ahaha she s beautiful btw
@@giuseppenhp8435 Drop dead gorgeous actually.
Somebody did and married her.
I’d try to date her just to have convos with this man anytime I could
@You take a sip from your Trusty Vault 13 canteen Who is Jordan alot? His name is Jordan Peterson, it's literally in the title.
"Destructive people think that Cain is their savior," Jordan Peterson. Fascinating.
100%
@Jon Iwanyszyn It can be extrapolated out to fit many archetypes, which just shows how brilliant it is!
@Liban Suleiman, Abel's sacrifice was a blood sacrifice, which foreshadows Christ's blood sacrifice on the cross. Cain's sacrifice lacked blood, which indicates his belief in man to be able to save himself. This is why Abel's sacrifice was accepted by God, and Cain's rejected. One is man-centered, and one is God-centered.
@@boethius9173 God didn't order no damn salad.
If you look at the Nazis from a logical point off view Jordan makes a lot off sense, but most people don't like that. People like to use there intuition hoping that logic isn't the truth. The death off intuition is the death of ego, only logic can prevail
70+ years and we're still crying about Hitler.
from 6000000 to 50000 is quite a difference
@@ImPotatoking check the numbers from the International Red Cross.
I' ve always heard that in war there are two desired outcomes - One is peace, the other is victory and you have to try to figure out which one your opponent is after. If they just want to win at all cost you won't be able to negotiate or find a diplomatic resolution so you just have to try and win also. But this third option never occurred to me. Once he was loosing the war he wanted neither peace nor victory and he just wanted to cause as much chaos and suffering even if it meant loosing. It is quite obvious now that I think about it. He wasn't being strategic at all. So sad that all these ppl died because of a deranged man's massive ego.
Some men can't be bought or reasoned with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
your ignoring the multiple attempts the germans made to negotiate a "white peace"
it was the drunken, chain smoking, obese, racist, warmongering churchill that wanted war on behalf of the soviet union the actual villains of the story
@@drpastormartinssempa8994 you're* also germany for sure wanted peace when invaded Poland huh
@@drpastormartinssempa8994 Germany didn’t want white peace, it wanted to occupy tons of europe
@@number1kenyan you are mistaking the goals of communism versus national socialism.
There was about 8 or so attempts from the germans to make peace with European powers.
Do you know what the commenterm is and what its goals were?
"Destructive people think Cain is their savior". That is a powerful line.
What does "Cain" mean or refer to?
@@Gebrueder_Glatze Biblical figure, one of the sons of Adam. Out of jealousy he murdered his brother Abel, becoming the first person to kill another. Due to the ultimate senselessness of this act, he's also the first destroyer
@@Gebrueder_Glatze Cain, the biblical Cain could not bring God a offering the same as his brother Abel who did well. Out of jealousy he killed him. Because God favored Abel. Then lied to God about it when God asked him about it. Then had self-pity when God cursed him. So Cain is pretty much selfish, only interested in his own glory. Not savior material.
@@Gebrueder_Glatze This video will catch you up to speed on Cain. ruclips.net/video/GYBW97Z4IMw/видео.html&ab_channel=WoolieVersus
@@dgray3771 The main point was Cain thought his offering was better than Abel. They were both farmers but Cain raised sheep Abel did veggies.
Other historians, thinkers, etc: "The reasons why the Nazis did what they did are vast and many."
Jordan Peterson: "Yeah, but maybe they were also just plain evil."
Adolf Hitler* - it's illogical to say that the reason why the 'average nazi' did bad shit was because they were evil. Some of them, yes. Others, because they were too afraid to oppose, they liked being the superior race and chose to ignore immorality, or perhaps because they believed the shit that Hitler was spewing to hide his true intentions (according to this guy).
I'm sure you know that already lol. Just wanted to put it out there.
@@emmachap1234 everyone thinks they know. Where's that big red button for yours.. because it needs pressing.
@@emmachap1234 Peterson actually does make a similar point to that in a different video.
"You think you'd rescue Anne Frank? Think again."
@@emmachap1234 no...many in the German populationwere completely compliant and agreed with National Soc. Policies. Evil is in all hearts. You don't have to be a mass murderer to be evil, folks.
@@titianmom Which is actually what historians agree on today. History changed from the "the normal man did not know" narrative of the cold war to the "most accepted it and complied".
And you can actually see that in some quite funny ways. For example libraries.
If people buy Hitlers Mein Kampf the old "They bought it, to have it on the shelve!" excuse comes in very fast. But libraries lend them to you. Nobody put library books they lended up for show, especially since they are visibaily marked as library books.
People lend those books to read them. So we got to assume that people who got those books from libraries read them and knew what Hitler planned.
Turns out there were record highs in libraries lending out Hitlers Mein Kampf, so much that many libraries were short on the book and had to buy additional copies.
The most lied about man in human history.
It’s really funny that the way you wrote this comment, I can’t tell if you’re referring to JP or Hitler lmao
@@PAWGmothCame here to say this.
This rope is looking nice lil bro
No one says anything about america dropping atomic bombs in japan. America is the worst country ever for doing that.
says the naz si......or are u just a bitter is1amist....?
I'd give a kidney to be able to articulate ideas like this guy.
Joe Lackey go out there and practice.
Joe Lackey or you could just give one to save someone's life...
yelix2 not quite as good because if you could articulate your point of view that well you could probably convince anyone to donate one of their kidneys
I think you guys took this statement out of context.
Joe Lackey Well the value of a kidney translates into college tuition for some English classes, so there's a start
“If you cannot understand why someone did something, look at the consequences-and infer the motivation.”
Carl Jung
Brilliant. Assuming, that is, that the consequences of an action are what the person intended them to be.
With as many variables as there are in wars and nations I'm not sure it's always best to apply this historically. I'm not entirely sure I buy Hitler wanted to lose the war and kill himself honestly
@@Smoddo It´s more of a subconscious thing. Power is an addictive thing, and in broken people that embrace their own issues instead of facing them leads to self-destructive behaviour.
@@rayra2772 but Peterson is saying Hitler consciously decided to kill rather than enslave, thus his motivation is not winning the war and becoming the most powerful man in the world and conqueer Europe. I just don't get why everyone think that's a genius take
Why could it not just as easily be incompetence of not being a good general, evil of wanting to kill people and jews in particular and a thirst to take over the entirety of Europe?
Also Hitler could have declared war instantly against the major powers but tried to snatch up as much territory as possible. If chaos and not winning was the goal why play it like that?
Or when they tried to make a secret peace with Britain?
Why is it instead more likely he wanted to lose war for Germany
And where does this outcome = motivation idea end. did Julius Caesar secretly wnat to be assassinated? Did China secretly want to be beaten by the Mongel empire? Did France and Netherlands hunger for German occupation?
@@Smoddo None of those things are mutually exclusive with each other. Let´s make a comparison: imagine winning the war is the equivalent of passing an important exam for a student; commiting to the mass genocide is the equivalent of procrastinating
Maybe this specific student isn´t the brightest guy out there and therefore even if he tried hard to study, he would still have serious issues to pass the exam anyways (aka incompetence), but even if this was the case, I think it doesn´t take rocket science to realize that procrastination is a waste of time, and yet, a lot of people still do it. Not because they don´t want to pass the exam, but because deep inside they would like to be doing something else instead of studying.
Now, extrapolate it to Hitler and WWII. Someone that gives deliberately more priority to procrastination than to passing the exam, maybe is someone that wants to do whatever they want to do and uses the excuse of making the exam so people don´t question him. Maybe this procrastinator could be deluded into his own lies, and he also believes he is trying to pass the exam when he isn´t, and that way he will be able to shut his own conscience when it starts questioning him too.
Just don´t underestimate the capacity of people for self-deception, specially when they have power.
This guy's got a firm grasp on how awful reality is
Lol
Jordan Peterson in every lecture:
"firmly grasp it!!"
Its true, people preach now that we are gonna create some utopia where everyone treats eachother fairly and we will all take car of eachother. It'll never happen. And honestly todays world is the nicest humanity has ever been by far. But humans are awful. Its only a matter of time until we start to destroy.
@@GuyFromTheSouth I see where you're coming from, but I don't believe this is the nicest people have ever been. It seems to me that social skills have hit the bottom of the barrel
@@tonyboleno8191 I completely agree
One of his rules for life is "Tell the truth - or, at least don’t lie."
I wish he followed it.
Exactly. I left a comment on one of his posts a few weeks ago that said I have a bunch of JBP Hail Lobster 🦞merch and despite my extreme disappointment in his behavior since ten/seven, I still have two giant posters up because I still need the “Clean your room” reminder bc I have ADHD and struggle with organization. But UNLIKE him, I *DON’T* need the “Tell the truth” reminder. He and Mikhaila are totally despicable.
This example also illustrates routine human interactions. Way too often some act offensively for no particular reason but this one - because they CAN. Excellent teacher.
wait what
Why is Donald Trump pretty and I am not? But why does he only have a wife but I have TWO HANDSOME GIRLFRIENDS who I show off in my masterpiece YT videos? Do you know the answer, dear vi
Self centered behavior is the Bane of our exsistence
@@AxxLAfriku you again?!
Yea man i just realised that. Human is weird
"Some men just want to watch the world burn."
Just typed joker to the search bar and this came second.
Not hitler
Well said Michael Cain.
Wow, deep.
Volcanic apocalypse? I told you that shits not happenen
Im a high school graduate and tbh this was the thing i was expecting from college.. i swear to god online classes are so boring ...this looks fun and hoping that i can learn like this..
I guess it depends on your teachers, then. My History and English teacher was still amazingly interesting online.
But yeah, I get it, irl is always better. I wish I could have had my first year "normally" as well. Will you get to go back to class this year?
Depends what you study. I studied a science degree and it was pure tedium
In person classes are boring when you have a boring teacher.
It’s pretty gruesome when you have a class on ww1 and ww2 when you have a professor like this. Tbh they get some sort of intellectual joy from learning and reading and understanding suffering. Rather than a focus on the good and positive, it honestly can be psychologically exhausting. There’s a lot of evil in this world, and a lot of good to balance it out. Never forget that. It’s all fun and games until they keep going into detail about how the details of trench warfare and how whole piles of bodies were just left to decompose.
@@Djt4848 one of my high school teachers went into extreme, gruesome detail about the holocaust, I literally almost passed out, and years later it still haunts me
3:54
Now the Nazis are responsible for the deaths of Chinese too? 😅
😂😂😂
different persecutors same persecution
Theres a profound quote i found that sums the Hitler experience in a different way from what we see. While we all put him on a pedestal, the horrific side of it is actually that many people involved allowed him to imolement his morbid idea, no matter his motivation. "Hitler could do nothing without the cooperation, support and willing submission od millions of people." The astonishment is not that a Hitler came along but that many others went along.
Edit: I appreciate all of yours understanding of my post and Im glad you're sharing your opinions and discussing it.
This is soft revisionism. It denies all of our extensive historical knowledge showing Hitler’s clear direct responsibility for, and direction of, the Holocaust. Why is this important? Because blame placed everywhere is blame placed nowhere.
The same can be said about Trump lol
@@scientifikx99 youre basically saying that instead of blaming everyone who is responsible, its best to pick one and just blame them. In doing so youre releasing thousands of others from their responsibility. Its liek having 5 people kill someone and they point finger at one of them saying "he made us do it". So now 4 of them runs free while only one is sentenced. Putting blame on other people is what is wrong with the society.
@@salimalbitar salim albitar That can be said for many people because we are very liable and easily manipulated to act a specific way eventho we think and feel differently. You can see that in examples of Isis and other terrorist org, Charles Manson and many other cults, Jim Jones and successfull Mass Suicides and so on. In all of this is obvious that one person holds the blame, yet thousands are involved. Making no action is action itself.
@@scientifikx99 the genocide side of it came much later on and that was from Hitler himself. But he got into power because of Versailles, the dire economic crisis and the lingering deep resentment from ww1 among the population.
considering how good his lectures are i can only imagine how difficult his exams are 🤯
On the contrary, I’d imagine his exams are a breeze considering how effective his teaching is. I actually had a professor of similar quality and I was able to pass with flying colors and never have to study once.
@@eMercody Exactly. I assume his tests are actually about how much you've learned, and not how much you remembered from a book you read last night.
@@eMercody - Same, I had a few instructors that were so effective that their tests were amazingly easy. That is how it should be. I also had an instructor that gave good lectures but these never once aligned with the exams - ever.
@@Cecilia-ky3uw - I imagine so. My instructors expected us to work together on homework, study, and preparation for tests. The collective power between everyone helps to insure good scores, high spirits, less stress, and a more successful student. However, some students refused to take advantage of everyone working in groups and those were the ones to usually get bad grades.
Another instructor would go through his material quickly. His class was limited to 3 hours per week and he had 6 hours of material to cover. His tests were pulled directly from his lectures and he would hint at would be on his test. Chances are not everyone was able to transcribe notes quickly enough so the expectation was for every student to come together and fill in the missing pieces to study. Those who did this always got good grades and those who didn't have difficulty passing the course. All the tools were made available, the student just had to learn to work with others and compile a complete note set to study in preparation.
I'd hate to grade his paper. Maps of meaning is near incomprehensible. Absolute word salad
And remember, a lot of people call this man a nazi.
I see very few people more against totalitarian regimes than Peterson. When you study psychology, you learn to accept that humanity has a dark side, and what terrible deeds get done when it is cut loose.
Some nutcase just wrote me like an entire essay about how Dr.Peterson is a nazi lol
@@beelzebootthecanadiandevil9600 Any chance and means you can send that to me? I love a good laugh.
He's definitely not a National Socialist. Just look at the pictures from inside his house. He has huge murals of Lenin and other Bolshevik revolutionaries covering the walls of almost every room of his house. That's why he does these nonsense "lectures" on AH that are nowhere close to the actual truth.
@@LetsAllDrinkToTheDeathOfAClown
People like you are hilarious with your adorable little driveby arguments.
Where can we have a look inside JP's house since that's all we have to do and it's so simple?
I think it's safe to assume you're completely full of sh*t based on the second part of your ridiculous accusation.
@@LetsAllDrinkToTheDeathOfAClown ew communism, that’s just as bad
I don’t think he had heard the AI translates on hitlers speech yet
Exactly
@Ergorexestu he's just playing out the narrative we've all been taught.
By the way, he did advocate for slavery. He's worse than Hitler is said to have been.
That doesn't makes hitler to be less evil, though
@@Global-Netizen what proof do we have that he was actuality evil, and how much is just the narrative we've had pushed on us?
That just justifies him.@@Global-Netizen
"if you don't understand why something happens, look for the one who gets the profit"
Old jewish saying
"The famous Lucius Cassius, whom the Roman people used to consider the most truthful and wisest judge, often used to say in evaluating cases “who stood to profit” [cui bono fuisset]." Now, it's just said as "Cui bono." (Except for Cher, who said "Cya Bono.")
Out of the horses mouth itself lol
Guys do not reply to @Right Left he gets fucking happiness in doing so.
Just move on with your day he will go to hell when he dies and be able to meet his best friend hitler
@@omrr2096 who is the right left guy
@@rightleft2819 Let’s hear your side
Anyone seeing accelerated mayhem in 2020?
Jonathan Trautman no
@@MoRahVeya yes
nah
@@MoRahVeya
ruclips.net/video/GO743lAHBiY/видео.html
@@OldSchool82 ruclips.net/video/GO743lAHBiY/видео.html
According to his sister, Paula, Adolf Hitler was beaten nearly daily as a child by his alcoholic stepfather, Alois. On two occasions, Hitler was "left for dead" from these beatings, which sometimes ended in strangulation. He sustained nerve damage from a mustard gas attack during WWI, which left him blind in a military hospital for three days. He lost his platoon comrades during another attack, which he was lucky to survive, but which left him with "survivor's guilt." Like other frontline soldiers, he was given methamphetamines by the German army--it helps soldiers need less sleep--which he apparently continued to use throughout his lifetime, and he also developed a cocaine habit. (Cocaine was actually prescribed to him by one of his many weird doctors as a "treatment" for chronic daily headaches - a pressure in his head that left him "unable to think," quite possibly related to his repressed anger.) He was probably schizophrenic and almost certainly had Parkinson's Disease and was chronically sleep deprived. Not that the guy was a saint, mind you, but he was quite traumatized and obviously THOROUGHLY CLINICALLY INSANE... unlike tens of millions of people who obeyed his orders.
Now that's a narrative we don't hear too often. Why? Because we like the idea of a lone, evil person being primarily responsible rather than something more complex and human and distributed that invites everyone to consider his or her own potential for horrific actions given the right set of circumstances. My mother is Jewish, fwiw, and I consider myself Jewish, too. I'm neither condoning Hitler, nor minimizing the absolute tragedy of WWII and the Holocaust, just suggesting we don't pin it all on one suffering lunatic bastard, which he obviously was, literally and figuratively.
This is actually quite significant with the trials that followed the end of the war. I am sure you have heard of these trials where people would often blame the higher ups and that they were just following orders. This excuse that they made of course is very well flawed, however that is just how it was quite often with these trials. So most of the blame was essentially shifted to Hitler, in addition to that the leader often becomes the one to take the blame or the fault when bad things occur. Hitler was just angry and bloody mad, so when the masses followed it just was crazy. Not many were very willing to do anything because they were scared of him.
Honestly though the people who took the heinous orders of killing and torturing for him are responsible with the blood on their hands. They may have gotten the order, but it was their choice to obey. This is not to exempt Hitler though, he was just a bloody mad nut that wanted people to be forced into pain.
@@numbernumber25 An interesting thing I learned a bit about in psychology is that human obedience is crazy. There were experiments (Stanley Milgrim) and they were instructed to shock the person on the other side if they didn't memorize a long sheet of paper (as it was being said). Most people went up to the max amount of volts possible. There was no real physical harm done, and they weren't forced in the way you'd expect. They were politely told to continue shocking, and basically all of them did. It proves that under the right circumstances, majority of humanity would cave. The reason I bring that up is because this test was based off these people saying they were following orders. No excuses on their part, and I don't condone it a bit, but it's scary to think about. They do indeed have blood on their hands, and it's not a good thing.
@@psychott6 Agreed, I believe I heard of the experiment. I think there was several settings on the gauge of electricity box they could adjust, of course no one was actually getting hurt it was just a prop hooked to a audio player that would play a different voice message depending on the voltage setting. One of the most brilliant things about the experiment was the use of electricity and audio recordings. Prior to the ability to record audio, I do not believe the researchers could have designed an obedience and order experiment as good.
But yeah you are correct that it does show that many would follow along to the situation and orders, however it still does not completely excuse them for their choices. It does though explain their choices which is very important, as it depicts that even if the person is not being threatened that they could still continue despite what they may consider to be concerning or bad. I believe that you make a good point though in terms of understanding what may have gone through the person's mindset with many of the soldiers.
I say this specifically because using imaginations and thinking through situations can only go far before it either misses the result or takes a different path, so using an experiment to simulate a similar situation would grant people more insight to what the people were willing to do.
But yeah it is just really unfortunate that we as humans are easy to bend to the will of someone else. In a position of a power dynamic things probably would push the person to be more obedient to commit acts which are just down right disgusting as being threatened will probably set in motion the person to focus on their life or the life of the person they are ordered to kill.
How easy it is to seduce "the masses" was shown only a very short period of time ago by the person in White House - before Biden...
Promise silly people what they want to hear and almost everybody will switch off the brain and shout "hooray".... no, mankind is not a very good thing. The evil is in us. In everyone of us. And it needs a lot of work not to give in to it.
@@Freiya2011 Well I would say that having a person rant in grand speeches is probably a higher idea of speaking than just regular speeches. But yeah you are correct, one issue in particular is that when people are not liked very much they will often target a group of people and shift any blame towards them. This also works for when they just need to make someone look bad so they could justify the use of government power to show that they are doing something. This way people would not question as much on whether the person is actually doing their job since everyone's attention is on the group that the person is basically throwing crud at. This is probably one of the worst things to happen because it happens pretty often in history and is still present today
funny how he can't see evil now
Lmao
Exactly
Look how good he’s at seeing the evilness of Hitler
But not seeing the genocide that’s currently taking place in front of our eyes recorded with sound n video that those Palestinians are exterminated😢
My history teacher was EXACTLY like this, and I'm so grateful for that. I still remember every concept even now.
Hitler?
@@jamesmilton4196 HAHAHA
Mine committed suicide
You mean ignoring inconvenient historical facts to push his emotional ideas?
@@jessesinclair3861 what?
Everytime I watch Mr Peterson, I feel like I walk away a little bit smarter, more informed and better equipped to understand others and myself, he’s the real deal.
exactly. He's a book of life but as a person
Yes sir. It's contagious.
True mate
Feelings are often misplaced. Chicks doing a women’s studies degree walk out of their lectures feeling like they just got a bit smarter too
Doctor Peterson*
Jordon Peterson has no understanding of the Holocaust or Hitler. He should open a book. He might be a good psychologist, but his understanding of history is wanting.
Buzzfeed: *reads title*
“Hmmm… sounds like something a racist would say.”
P ppl
Ironically buzzfeed is one of the most racist and sexist sites. So I wouldnt be surprised if they assumed as much. 😂
He is looking at it through the psychological perspective to demonstrate how evil he was.
@@Joeri20cm ihi
Saying he’s racist sounds like something a racist would say!!!
Try starting your day for 1 year with the mentality that ….”everything I was taught was a lie” then use common sense examining the world around you and see if your opinion of your statement changes…
Remember 🧔🏻♂️ didn’t build oxyclean in a day!
ㅤ
Search him up.. He's a famous intellectual
@brightsun singh You selling him?😅
Not sure why this guy thinks that's why Hitler lost the war. However after studying WWII for the last 40 myself and having extensive knowledge on this subject, Hitler lost the war for one reason and one reason only. And that reason was he took on the Russians in the east, whilst fighting the allies in the west. Not enough manpower for both, and not being equipped for the eastern front with limited resources, and his men didn't have the correct equipment in the east. This last part cost Hitler's army to lose vast amounts of men, and what equipment they had, which accelerated the loss of the war.
Having manpower in those concentration camps which was small in comparison to say an army, would not have been enough to cover both front's and those men and women did not have the equipment even if they had been sent to the front line.
So this in utter nonsense.
If it's one thing i do know it's my history on this war, and this war alone. I am also sure that this guy has not been looking over and studying this subject like i have for forty years or more. Hitler was not particularly evil himself. He didn't just wake up one day and think i know i will kill all these people in camps, no. His henchmen did that, they came to Hitler with these ideas and put them to him. Hitler put Germany back on track in the 1930's with rebuilding and putting people to work and giving them food, homes, jobs and a future to look forward too. However thing's went from bad to worse when the final solution was thought of, and Hitler wanted revenge for the loss of WW1.
I do think even though the guy is giving a talk and has the title of a professor, he should go away and look at the real event's that took place, like Hitler not taking the correct advice from his generals when thing's needed a generals advice to be followed. These thing's cost Hitler the war. Not a few thousand men in camps.
Worst thing of all here is, this guy is being listened too, and being paid for giving incorrect information, which distorts history in the teaching.
God help us.
so just a monologue?
@@patrickdoyle9369 you didnt get what he meant at all. Stick to history
I had one of those guys as a history and societal teacher during the upper secondary school in Sweden - years of like 16 to 18. He had the same disposition - the vivid talent to make history with its actors and structure perspectives to come alive. He put much emphesis to the students´ ability to challange him with own analysis than to just repeat him or the books for higher grades. Happy times!
Than what you had was a true teacher. Not a memorization of facts but a deep understanding of what happened
unfortunately, his version of history is not really the truth either, it just fit's his narrative. The Nazis did enslave the ones capable to work, they just did not spent any resources (e.g. food) on them and killed them once they were useless. Estimated 6-8 million people were forced into forced labor and for Jews and Synthi and Roma, the official strategy was "extermination through labor". Goebbels came up with this strategy and sold them to companies where they had a life expectancy of a couple month and the Reich made a lot of money from them. They even made a lot of money from the corpses. There are detailed cold blooded profitability analysis documents adding up profits of about 1500 Reichsmark and expenses like 2 Reichsmark for burning the corpse.
So of course he wanted to win, he assumed he could turn the tide until basically hours before he died and then he assumed that they all betrayed him. Like Trump, every failure by himself or one of his goons was interpreted by him as a personal attack or betrayal (typical narcissist). That doesn't mean he didn't want to win.
I had an awesome teacher aswell in Sweden during 16-18. Was it the same maybe? Did you attend Soltorg perhaps? :D
@@vanivari359 It’s a good point though I do wonder if it wouldn’t be strictly more rational to feed their working slaves just enough for them to continue working? Just expand into more camps and factories as you round more and more up. It’s incredibly cheap labor after all.
@@roobeert1992 Im afraid not. Did my upper secondary school in Västerås between like 2003-2006 or something.
incredible how such an intelligent man believes in the biggest lie of all times
God I love how people are finally waking up
He isn't intelligent at all, he just uses fancy words here and there and says a whole bunch of fancy nothings to seem smart while silently putting his agenda in.
@@Eggdine Yeah I really informed myself last summer and I already see how many people are also starting to see it. I don't know how long you have been knowing all this but I cannot imagine how difficult it must have been for you if you have been knowing this for say 10 years.
Mao: when you killed a hundred million but the guy who killed twenty gets all the attention
mao kill 900 godzillion people
The difference is choices, mao made a choice that resulted in the deaths of millions. Hitler specifically had people killed
@@jrs351 So his ideas were genocidal by mistake? Somehow that isn't comforting.
@@jrs351 well, you can argue that the Great Leap Forward was a bunch of bad decision. But the Cultural Revolution was intentional
No dispute. No argument. But I believe intentionally slaughtering people is a minute difference then changing a culture and not caring if people died because of it. Neither were up for Nobel pace prizes and I would say they are different levels of evil
Every time he put his hand in his pocket I was waiting for him to give some candies to his students
LOL hahaha same. That or a prop to use.
No he's just touching the trophy from his latest kill
Someone is a fan of Patrick Jane.
Or fondling himself because he has a hole in his pocket
The one ring.
This video enraged Adolf's father, who punished him severely.
Oversimplified😃
I’ve never heard anything regarding Hitlers parents and what his upbringing was like.
@@cam553 it's an oversimplified reference. Watch his videos, they're very entertaining.
Dude, Uncool
Lmao
imagine it just turns out he's Hitler reincarnated telling us how he should've done things in the first place.
joking aside this guy makes history even more fun, reminds me of the passion my history teacher had.
@Zoomerwaffen xx not in all cases, although it definitely holds truth to it
@@angrychuck6197 what?
And the most remarkable part about that is, this guy isn’t even teaching a history class.
@@angrychuck6197 Damn you got the whole squad laughing
@@angrychuck6197 😐SO FUNNY JOKE!
“History is written by the victors” -Winston Churchill
SlightPit30 yeah but like there's also Nazi accounts from the axis powers just saying
I love that saying I believe everything in ww2 that they say happened... happened but man that really gets u wondering
Doesn't necessarily mean that the history that gets written is wrong.
The Toilet Inspector I know it's just a good saying
Junior Disbennett My reply was to the person who posted the quote.
Great points. For some people, causing the suffering of others is an end, not a means to an end.
So you’ve met my ex?
Racism in its purest form. We're seeing this same thing in America.
Great points? Where? Historically inaccurate nonsense...
@@freda2758 Please tell me more how so.
@@freda2758 The "racism", just wondering if you are you referring to Hitler, or the Jews?
Both sides of ww2 were massively funded by the same people. I believe it was all about money, control and depopulation.
Really? So how they funded a Japan? Have you ever learn about MEFO bills?
"round em up fine, enslave them fine, but don't kill them" dude had me laughing with that 💀
@@Project_Algiz en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution
@@Project_Algiz I don't know, maybe a little something called concentration camps rings a bell in you?
@@Project_Algiz Gas chambers, shooting in the head though before having them to dig up there own grave, experiments, etc
Our society stigmatizes the mentally ill... and rightfully so, these people are nuts!
@@Project_Algiz Sir, you're being deceived by neo-nazis, Zundel based his claims on the Leuchter report, a report that was debunked by polish scientist. You want the truth? You can read reports from the SS itself where the plans for the genocide were written, that way you can stop spreading false claims and denying the truth
Reminds me of my 11th grade History teacher Ms. Quarles. Just like him, she always had a way with teaching and making me want to learn more. Pure educators.
Rare individual. I can count on one hand with fingers broken how many teachers inspired me.
You know he's lying right? Lol
@@malcolmlittle7961 how do you know hes lying. Lol
@@Vader4499 He makes it seem as if Adolf Hitler was a genocidal maniac and his SS were a group of sadistic thugs. Nothing could be further from the truth and is a complete distortion of reality. The rabbit hole is deep my friend
7th grade Mr Stewart, history,1967 - or Mr Addy? Math, next year. Mrs Bethe 1972
My fave can still recall so many yrs past.
“If you can’t figure out what is the motivation of someone, look at the outcome, and infer the motivation...
Matthew 16 - Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
...A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
...Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Nice analysis
Yes! All truth comes from God.
False. Only just looking at the outcome puts the burden solely on what it ended in. If the confederacy won the civil war then the motivation of the conflict was to preserve slavery.
Yes christianity destroyed countless native civilizations
@@Ajourneyofknowing The motivation of the conflict was to preserve slavery. That was succinctly stated by the leaders of the confederacy who felt aggrieved by Lincoln's victory in 1860.
These lectures are priceless. We wont ever get a lesson from him personally but perhaps RUclips is an amazing platform for we can still know how he practiced.
Are you kidding? This is trash, his entire argument hinges on the painter being an objectively evil person, and the ‘caust’s having happened. I understand that these two things are gospel these days, but it doesnt lend to the logic of his argument.
I can trust this guy way more than Ben Shapiro. He’s so unbiased and he actually makes sense
Wrong, JP does have his biases. His ideas are heavily influenced by his traditional christian background which makes his lessons on marriage, dating and family in the modern day a possible death sentence, especially if you're male. His reasons for why people marry are dead wrong, his dating advice doesn't take human nature into account, and his views on family are hopelessly idealistic. Don't get me wrong, JP does have good advice, but not all of it.
@@kaptinbarfbeerd1317 Well I'm sure everyone has their own biases/leanings according to their respective backgrounds, how does that make him any less objective compared to the average modern thinker.
@@elijahhartman5799 If the conclusions JP talks about come from his traditional christian background, they are biased by definition. I'll give you an example.
JP says (and I'm paraphrasing here) that women who don't want to be mothers are messed in the head. He does not take into account there are women out there who regret becoming mothers. Some women remember their parents being miserable and they don't want to be the same. Some forgo family for financial reasons. Or the women who feel like indentured slaves being housewives. Or that there are women out there who would rather use their time for other pursuits. Or the countless women who regret marrying their husbands. He doesn't address these issues either, he just reverts to the traditional female gender role as the way things should be while those who don't fit that definition are brushed off as a minority without evidence. I'm not sure what the numbers are either but I have seen surveys were a majority of women regret marrying their husbands. If his traditional christian worldview wasn't holding him back, I'm sure he could come to a different conclusion.
@@kaptinbarfbeerd1317 If you consider his views on dating and marriage as "death sentence", then you're just hopelessly broken
@@fupopanda Or you're just hopelessly clueless
Maybe Hitler was really pissed off after they kicked him out of art school. I've heard something to the tune of, "If the village is cold to the child, the child will burn the village to the ground to feel the warmth."
That argument holds no water in my case. It made me want to make sure I never did the same to anyone else. My success is in spite of a number of things.
Some of em just waiting for an excuse to let go on the world, even though that won’t even fill the hole in his soul, or if he has no soul or was metaphorically a man that looks at his self as a saint for the Germans on earth... to young and overzealous men ready to prove themselves, that’s tempting.. but he musta been a helluva talker cuz it would take some just over the top rants and just got down on it .. it was something I have studied in depth.... but the mans still satan because he couldn’t fill the hole
I wouldn't see why he would target only a few specific groups though. Unless his art teacher was Jewish? Idk.
@leonard mathes Exaclty. Plus Peterson is wrong here - the Nazis absolutely used the Jews as slave labor. Most of them died of starvation brought on by allied bombing of supply chains, or typhus.
Maybe you have no idea what you are talking about.
Over 9,000 dislikes for this video... I’m trying to understand exactly what it is about this video that so many people find offensive.
Logan's Hot Rod & 4X4 People are dumb and hate it when others make them feel as dumb as they are.
He talks about liquidating millions of people like a strategy without any empathy
@Dane Griffard yes and that's the problem. Peterson talks like Hitler... Without any empathy for genocide.
@Dane Griffard I haven't seen Peterson ever use the word holocaust... Or explain the role of rabid antisemitism in explaining the Holocaust. Do you have any links?
It's because they listen to the first ten seconds of the video and hit the dislike button before he finishes explaining the idea.
Or maybe he didn’t liquify people by the millions and it was all a lie
You are correct
what was the number then
“Master wayne, some people just want to watch the world burn”
@R achternaam Being ns? Your reply makes little sense.
@@Cheddar_Wizard he's talking about hitler choosing to cause maximum chaos and destruction rather than support his own cause
@@Cheddar_Wizard It's a quote from the Dark Knight that pretty well fits exactly what Peterson is saying in this video....
@@thanezollman5269 Hitler hastened the extermination because the wermarcht was facing a food shortage and they didn't want to feed prisoners anymore near the end of the war. It is well documented, it has nothing to do with maximizing chaos. Jordan is plain wrong here. As a big history buff, this drives me nuts.
@@nenadmilovanovic5271 Donald trump was the best , most successful US president of all time !!
MAGA 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
“If you can’t figure out what someone’s doing or why, look at the outcome, and infer the motivation.”
Wow. Crazy how much I align with this level of thinking. Great piece here, loved it.
Yes, Peterson just described himself. Why do you think he has a thousand YT videos? He's getting filthy rich by promoting political confrontation. Suckers!
Inference is the enemy of reason. This may the single most ill-advised quip Peterson has ever contrived. I suggest, if you can't figure out what someone is doing -- ask them. Injecting yet another layer of your own psychosis onto another's actions as a means to rationalize it is a display of narcissism.
This right here is why Jordan Peterson is a disgusting shill.
Totally wrong view about everything relating to WW2. Go back on your antidepressants, Jordy. Nobody wants to hear your hot takes on history.
If someone accidentally stumbles into domino and everything falls apart what about then?
@@Mayhzon So what exactly is totally wrong in what he's saying?
I would’ve stayed awake in history class if this guy was my teacher.
You and me both.
He’s not a historian, he’s a psychologist
@@Kennnnyy__ don’t matter
I mean, he's also wrong about all of it though.
@@Peter-qe1yh wdym hitler did mass murder Jews when he was losing the war the questions why you think obviously he just accepted his fate and decided to take them out with him but I doubt it was simply because of hate I think he genuinely thought that in the long run exterminating the Jewish population would be more beneficial to his country then saving the lives of the soldiers by giving up in their final stand
I wished I could take his classes. He's such a brilliant speaker.
Eh
I wish the same
Just watch it on RUclips lol
@@craigd123 - not the same. It's like watching a video of Niagara Falls on RUclips.
@@aceace605 pure gheyness
Plot twist : he keeps reaching in his pocket to hold the ring.
My precioussss, gollum gollum :P
@@brasarino bilbo baggins
@@Obligated4 Frodo
@@Obligated4 what?!
@@bilbobagginssis6872 bilbo baggins
The humanities class you were glad you were forced to take.
Facts
What about Stalin and his gulags?
Thanks to Stalin Hitler didn´t won the war.
Stalin was equally or even more worse than Hitler but it makes 0 sense to bring his name up in this conversation right now unless you’re trying to play H. actions down
You just missed the point of this video. In the case of Hitler, him killing Jews was more of an end rather than means to an end. In the case of Stalin, the gulags were the means to reach his end (building socialism in short time). This makes Hitler more evil because during the end of the war he allocated a significant portion of his resources in eliminating the Jews instead of focusing on the war effort.
H!tler was worse he specifically wanted €xtermination to take place while Stalin wanted exploitation.
Damn kermit is so good at history
Damn right he is 💯😂
I can’t unhear it now
Damn you…
maaan i cant unhear it now 💀😫
Hell I never even realized.
Finishes his speech -
Tutor - "So any questions?"
Entire class - "What's in your pocket?"
But what do you mean by pocket?
THE BLACK GOO IN YOUR RIGHT POCKET !😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳CLASS😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
It's The Ring ⭕. It's making him intelligent and live longer....
Probably just knowledge
"Class, I present to you... Hitler's testicle."
How Hitler was more evil than you think....
Professor: "He actually considered his mustache ' *fashionable* ' "
It was fashionable. Charlie Chaplin had the same mustache.
It was at the time
@@mikelouis2118 /whoooooosh
@@calus_bath_water /whoooooooosh
@@lancehandy6648 r/woooshhhh
"There's a bit of Hitler in everyone"
-Jordan Peterson.
JP strikes me as someone that was bullied a lot in life cause he is good at playing a victim.
No, absolutly not. Unless by Hitler he meant "morally questionable".
@@timokohler6631 most certainly
Read his books
@@meditationwithtyler No thank you. Belive me there is no Hitler in you, not even a little bit.
@@timokohler6631 there is a Hitler in all of us, in me and in you.
The world likes to hate Hitler as though they are so different.
You haven’t looked deep enough inside yourself
He keeps putting his hand in his pocket to feel the one ring.
It is precious to him
😂😂😂
With the power he can dominate the people and make them clean their rooms
Lmao
Jordan the Gray must always protect the ring
Honestly, if teachers would have been like him, I think us students would have no problem making studying one of our hobbies, rather than fearing the subject and just mugging them up to get marks
Progressive Leftists (and yes, the supposed politicians in their supposed opposition) don't want an educated, free-thinking populace; they want mindless drones which are easily whipped up into mob frenzy.
Read other sources the history has been altered by the winning
There's always academic standards. It's just not JP telling stories😂 That means Tests of definitions, essays, and work.
Calle a nerd, but speak for yourself. I loved being in school and learning.
for real! I never did good in school and always had trouble focusing while in class but at home I'd be nose deep in books about the subject if it was interesting to me. Teachers need have knowlegde on the subject but also and maybe even more importantly about the art of teaching itself and present the subject in an interesting way
This was an interesting perspective on Hitler's motivations - Hitler simply destroyed because his intention was to destroy rather than win a war and create some reich etc. But it assumes that Hitler was rational to some degree. It made me think of the current situation with Erdogan in Turkey, the man who thinks that reducing interest rates is the way to fight inflation. If he destroys the Turkish economy is that because his actual intention is to destroy it.
As someone who fled Turkey because of this becoming increasingly clear, I believe you are 100% correct. With Turkeys previous rulers leaving them in dire condition, all the citizens treated Erdogan and his party like Gods, pretty damn similar to Germany during this era. Even today with the increasingly horrible economy in Turkey people still worship the man and this video made me rethink if his intention really was to bring Turkey back to power, especially since him and his party are basically the only people benefitting from the mayhem...
The entire world is destroying the financial system on purpose. Crypto is slowly being adopted. The pandemic is partly real but mostly being used as a cover up.
@@scrusius2849 sure
@@themaster2764 well I’ve already made 18k and it’s just started so yeh lol sure
And the people blindly following his ideas, almost even glorifying him as if he were a holy figure, are in the majority too. Kind of scary to think whether or not my home country will survive in his hands.
“Bro please don’t say anything weird at my family reunion”
Me - 0:01
"Destructive people think that Cain is their savior." Damn!
Says the people who support the actual mass murderer, Abel
@@MasterCast001 , Say what?
@@MasterCast001 ??
@@MasterCast001 obvious troll is obvious
If I had a tatoo... That would be it. WHAT A PHRASE
“Destructive people thank that Cain is their savior” wow that needs a whole video of its own
Cain*
I can understand this argument, but my problem is that it’s fine to do this analysis on a single person, or even a group of like mined people, but the Nazi war machine was a vast organisation involving many different people from many different backgrounds and this includes the entire structure behind the concentration camps. How can we assume everyone involved was just doing it to create mayhem through an evil in the psyche? There was definitely more behind it than just that, the argument he puts forward is just as much an underestimation as the argument that it’s over natural resources. Hitler himself didn’t pass any specific instructions of what to do, it’s well known that it was those trying to impress him to further their own careers that interpreted his mumbo jumbo into an evil killing machine, and they weren’t all the same. Himmler, Heidrich, Mengele etc were evil individuals without a doubt, but they all had different motives.
your argument is valid, however we need to see that this is a 4ish minute snippet of what was most defiantly a much larger discussion/lesson. we dont see the very beginning of what he was talking about that lead to this.
It was pretty clear the analysis was on Hitler and not "everyone involved". Your point seems correct, I just don't think it applies here.
Jordan is talking about looking at someone's actions and you'll find out his/her motivations. The nazi example is a little bit harsh but it conveys the mesage that actions follos thoughts
I think it is important that he’s referring to Hitler specifically and not all of Nazis. Because he’s talking about his motivation. The Nazis themselves are a mixed bag of motivations. Some of which is to serve their inspiring idol seen in Hitler. Meaning that for them they may have actually believed what they were doing was for some sort of cause. Others opened their eyes and regret what they did. Some were just as evil as him.
@@CryptolockerMD spot on
Love you jp, but those "gas chambers" cant be located tbf. Not saying they dont exist, however, unless you were there...
What do you mean by „the gas chambers can’t be located”? Are you proactively ignoring evidence and still standing gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau or Stutthof (just to name two) or are you clinically retarded? Nazis would probably put you in a gas chamber too with that kind of backwards thinking and medically not so sane mind
They had them on wheels too, they were called gas vans.
Still exist
Love the eye-contact he makes with the students, like staring into their souls...
He is making sure they're paying attention
@@luizmarinho6138 maybe. But he has said before he does it because he is speaking TO each of them - that doesn't necessarily mean he is doing it to make sure they're paying attention
Do you know why he did that. DO YOU. EY DO YOU FUCKING KNOW! S...sir! GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER BUCKO!
It's one of the ways he explains how to properly do public speaking. Speak to one individual at a time
Do you think you are a good person? Wanna be a better person?
Watch this to find out:
ruclips.net/video/TCSUKIhjevo/видео.html
He uses stand up techniques to give his classes. Smart man
If you mean public speaking techniques, yes you are most definitely correct
@@soulexcaliber008 😭😭 cuz you killed the man
@@morehamhead7603 ? im lost
@@sraphm ?
@@redgordo9058 ?
The whole time Dr. Peterson’s right hand was in his right jacket pocket I though he was going to pull out a deck of cards and perform a magic trick. I enjoyed part of the lecture as well.
That or a packet of Jelly Babies. 😁
Haha
I thought he was going to click to the next PowerPoint slide
That's symbolism. Stalin also made that sign along with many other high profile people
Hiding the right hand*
Napoleon also made that sign
What about the central banks ?
Oy vey!
@@mikespearwood3914 oy vey!!! the goy are noticing
This assumes that one can desire one outcome while producing another out of ignorance or false ideals. It seems to me to be perfectly coherent that Hitler simply believed false things that he thought would produce the effects he desired but in fact produced the reverse. So as things got worse he simply pushed the accelerator to the floor on his ideals which he thought would fix the problem but in fact was only accelerating the outcomes that were the opposite of what he wanted. False ideals sincerely believed.
Exactly. Peterson seems unwilling to grasp the obvious, that it's common for people to make decisions that cause disastrous outcomes they never intended or wanted, at any level, not even "deep down." Especially crackpots with elaborate false beliefs, because those are wildly out of kilter with reality.
"Why would you attribute Hitler the highest possible motives".
He's not assuming anything.
I made a criticism of Peterson's delivery on this video. Your analysis provided a much more clear picture of his overall point. Thank you for the clarity and perhaps you may help Peterson speak to the masses in a more coherent way without such ambiguous delivery.
@D Sullivan well you would start a war to win, but when you're losing, your strategy should change as conditions change. Devoting resources to commit genocide during a war is wasteful and not conducive to winning. The fact that Hitler accelerated the rate at which they were killing Jews and POWs suggest that he didn't plan to do such after the war and that suggests that he had the knowledge that he already lost the war.
I would suggest you all take a look at the overall point here instead of trying to sound intelligent. His point is that some people don't have a "logical" reason for their actions. Mental illness like psychopathy or schizophrenia aren't brand new we are just more aware of them. His point is that it doesn't mean someone with one of those mental illnesses is less or more clever or successful, you're just judging by the wrong metrics. He's absolutely correct in that Hitler's approach to "the war" was not in any way predicated on winning. His actions don't make sense to you and me because they are only meant to make sense to him. Thusly he presents the psychological concept that if you can't glean a rational motivation from the person look at the outcome.
I’m glad he wasn’t my high school history teacher. I remember how I was how I took all my teachers for granted. We all say “I wish I had him in HS” but do you really? Would you even know he’s someone you better appreciate? Naw, I like being able to look him up in my 30s and get a refresher from him
He would talk to me like an adult, that's more than most high school teachers
My high school teacher would throw on a video and sleep tf u talking about? 🤦🏽♂️😭
not everyone was or is a shitty student bro
@@GabrielBear I’m a HS strength and conditioning coach so I’m required to teach a subject too. I teach chemistry and I try to make everything as hands on as I can. Mixing all kinds of things together for the wow factor, blowing up tannerite in the parking lot, I try to make sure every day we do something. I hate being the teacher that puts on a video and cures their hangover.
NAW 😂😂😂😂😂
“Some men just want to watch the world burn”
Yessir, That was Hitler, from almost the second he sprung out of his mother.
Alfred-dark knight
That's what psychopathy does to humanity. But remember it's not the person. It's the illness.
Remember when he went on stage to cry for Israel. He is so cute when he grovels.
The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' - this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats.
--- Aldous Huxley
Good quote there! very true
Twitter s cancel culture
THAT is a quote that I badly needed to hear, but did not know existed up until now. Thank you!
Exaclty what happens with SOME corona fear possesed people
Wow, Spot on
"Destructive people think that Cain is their savior." - Jordan Peterson
Chilling.
Which Cain is he referencing? Just curious.
@@geronimostanding5145 cain as in cain and able
@@geronimostanding5145: He's referencing the biblical account recorded in chapter 4 of Genesis which tells of the two brothers "Cain" and "Abel," Cain being the one who murdered his brother out of jealousy and spite.
@@ObscurityIsBest thought so. thanks.
@@justinboyd9725 thanx