A tank is only as good as it's crew but also what's outside of it like having air superiority, having artillery behind you, having infantry look for anti-tank missile teams. It's all about working together.
Andrew, Every tank should have a minimum of two lazy boy lounges and a t.v.. Unless I’m wrong, a tank is made for fighting and not for lounging. If you are familiar with tanks, obviously you are not, they are also noisy and dirty and sweaty and smelly and dangerous. Not only dangerous to the enemy but also the tank crew
I love how the Russian bots are talking bout how they 1 Abrams In Moscow and have destroyed/damaged five more. Failed to mention almost 90 to a 100 T90s have been damaged/destroyed/abandoned 8 of were captured. Also how’s it’s feel to loss almost 3000 tanks in two years of combat
@@billny5575 are you dumb or just smooth brained. The Russians have been making T 90 since the late 90s starting with the T 90 a and then moving to the T 90 AK and then moving to the T 90 SD and then moving to the T 90 M which is the most modern version of the T 90 which Ukraine has destroyed roughly 100 T 90 M‘s again the most advanced tank Russia has the T 90 M look it up.
The tank is an instrument in combat, the crew is what makes the tank lethal. I used to be a tank commander back in the late 90s on the M1A1 Abrams. My favorite positions is first being the gunner then being the commander. Before becoming one of the two senior positions all tankers must be proficient in maintaining the tank and the weapons systems first. As a crew the driver is the most junior position where he knows the tank commander and gunner to drive to favorable terrain and firing positions under the direction of the TC. The loader must load the main gun as fast as possible and the second set of eyes for the commander and responsible for the radios. His secondary responsibility is being the gunner if the gunner is taken out of action. Every crew member is capable of doing two to three jobs above their positions. This teaches junior members to learn and move into leadership positions in the future. The tank commander has to be technically and tactically proficient because his tank would be able to step up as Platoon Sergeant or Platoon Leader. I did enjoy gunnery during my years in Armor but the worst part is maintaining the tank has always been problematic and intensive from my experience.
Reddevil I was also a tank commander but i go way back a few years. The late 50's and early 60's. Back then the M48 Patton. 90mm and a 50 cal machine gun for the commander. A great tank for its time. It was easy to operate compared to the Abrams. The interior was painted white. A crew of four,commander, gunner, loader and driver. Keeping it clean was the biggest issue and a few bruises from getting banger around. Stationed at Ft. Knox Ky. I admire the tankers of today for their skill and dedication.
Thank you for your service Soldier. I served as a Unit Diary Clerk in the USMC 5/1990 to 1/1995 with 2nd Light Armored Amphibious Assault Reconnaissance Battalion. (Actually 2nd AAR but that doesn't say anything to most people) When not keeping unit training and logistics records I was the Platoon Lead for those deployed out of the back of the LAV to protect her from the flanks during refueling, investing the unknown, knocking holes through walls for us. Ect... The 30mm chain gun we had when using its tiny SABO round was amazing, but I can't imagine the power of this main cannon.
Is this at NTC (National Training Center CA)?? War vet here 3ID Mech. Haha I guess I should have kept watching… before I made a comment 10 seconds into the video. Drove a M2a2 Brad. I miss those years… playing laser tag (miles gear) out in the Mojave Desert.
The Abrams M 1 Tank's Power Plant is twice that of the "Tiger 1" (56 tons) & Tiger 2" (68 tons) which both used the 850 hp Maybach 12 cyl engine...🇺🇸🇩🇪
29:37 Fun fact! Even though t55 is a soviet tank, writing inside of the tank is in Polish. Quick google search says Poland had licence to produce those tanks since 1964. its worth remembering Poland was behind the iron curtain until 1989.
In this part of the video I remember some time ago that the Army has a new tank but I have a friend who was in a tank and that the tank commander thought it was funny to drive through buildings just for fun and I think that it's just plain sick or stupid but I like watching battle videos to understand battle strategies like when I was in high school 3 years ROTC.
You have to love American marketing. The russians are using the M1A1 Abrams as target practice, but still, for the yanks, this is the BEST tank in the world. Ask the Merkava what it thinks about that.
IKR? The Russian tanks have been blown up by the literal thousands. To top it off, they are bragging about parrading M1A1's around... the tanks from the early 90s. The M1A2s and the SepV3s are much better.
The Russians didn't claim their tanks were superior. It is you guys who said NATO tanks are invincible and game changers. And what happened now to your gold standard weapons?
@@G-Man-half-life French Tank. The name kinda gives it away, unless you're trying to be a smartass. AND the LeClerc is a badass tank. Not as good as the Abrams, but a great tank.
No need for Su-24 (Frogfoot) or KA-52 (Alligator) or drones, simple Kornet does the trick (man portable, Russians are mounting them even on buggies)...
Friendly reminder: This video was first published before the Russo-Ukranian War, before inexpensive drones were implemented to destroy modern multi-million dollar MBTs
The track on the right side of the M1 is a little farther ahead of the track on the left side because of the torsion bar suspension which causes the track on the right to wear out faster than the track on the left...how does that make sense? Both sets of tracks still go over the same terrain don't they? So why does does one side wear out quicker just because it's a little ahead of the other? If my feet walk 10 miles, my right foot isn't going to be hurting a little more than my left just because I start with my right foot. ...that guy has been in the army for 16 years and he's only a sergeant first class?!?
I just watched a Doc and it showed Gen. Montgomery who was British through and through and his personal weapon for protection throughout the war, that he kept at arms reach in every vehicle he traveled in was the American made M1 Carbine.
All of this comes at the cost of weight. The M1 is fattest tank in the world pushing almost 80 tons. It can't cross most bridges and transport planes can barely carry just one M1 because it's so heavy. The US military is desperately trying to find ways to shave off weight for future versions of the tank because the weight has become a big issue.
Had it gone hot in the 1980s it would have been the T72.....which would have been creamed by NATOs most powerful tank....you guessed it....the British Chieftain MBT, manned by the best tank crews in NATO....GOD SAVE THE QUEEN (as it was then)🥰🥰🥰🥰
@@EsromNhira-vw1vqfour abrams lost in 2 months. Russia lost 2000+ tanks in 2 years. That’s 2000 tanks in 730+ days which means russia lost several tanks a day compared to one abrams every couple of days/weeks. Who is getting toasted again orc?
It was an informative and wonderful description of Abrams tank characteristics balancing amongst firepower, accuracy, speed & fast minnuvoraity. Thanks for sharing
@@SpicyLunarDust That is incorrect. Tanks use sabot rounds just as much as tank destroyers could or would. A tank destroyer typically uses a larger main gun that doesn’t fit inside a mobile, rotating turret. It’s basically an anti tank gun with some tracks slapped on it and a bit of armor at the front.
@@fizzmoe9846 It’s extremely vague but not wrong. There’s so many different facets to this, tank destroyers aren’t just limited to Sabot ammunition, there’s also HEAT, APFSDS-T, APDST, AP, and a number others. The Sabot just being the plastic around the projectile as it fires. There certainly are plenty of fixed gun tank destroyers, actually most were, but not all tank destroyers are fixed gun. And as far as increasing the caliber of the weapon, again that does happen, but what designates a tank destroyer is its Muzzle Velocity”. The US considered the M4A3E8 a “Tank Destroyer” but it only had a 1mm increase from its 75mm gun (still a huge difference), but the muzzle velocity was almost doubled.
@@Bob-el7rl aww . Are you that uneducated or just another hater ? Son I know tankers . I know our military and logistical machine. We field the best if not constantly amongst the best. Why is that opinion, fact a constant ???? I'm waiting....
@@DarkKatzy013 why does it have BRITISH armour ..coz you take from the best :) it has awful range ..takes a huge team to keep them running etc etc .. it is an awesome tank i dont dispute that ..the best tho .. nope ..im not saying the challenger is better ..that too has its flaws .. i would say the current leopard is the better of the lot
Ukraine has been trained in combined arms, killweb, etc...but they are using old Soviet era tactics and drones are able to take out the Abrams. At least two were due to blast door being left open.
Old series, produced in 2000s, I see US army soldiers wearing UCP pattern uniform , few years after Iraq war. More M1 Abrams war destroyed in 2010s in Iraq by Russian ATGM, and in 2000s , Russian T90 tank no more information.
A good tank....but the British Challenger 2 is the best MBT in the world today, until of course the British Challenger 3 comes on line....then just leave it to us chaps....GOD SAVE THE KING😜😜😜😜
Nah, not at all. Thanks are too much of a presence on the battlefield. More than likely we will see multiple defense mechanisms develop. Also, are you forgetting that drones can be used to supplement the tanks
The Russian and Chinese trolls can’t accept the fact we gave Ukraine a handful of FIRST generation Abrams from the 80’s, and Russia can’t replace how fast their tanks are Orbiting🤡🤣🤣🤣
😂 is that what you are telling yourself to cope 🤣. Don't make us laugh. The US refused to send the new ones because they would have been destroyed just as easily as the old ones. The US has told Ukraine to remove all their takes from the front lines because of the embarrassment of watching them getting destroyed by 10 000 dollar drones. 😂 The US has also told Ukraine that no UK tanks should be sent to the front lines. 😂😂 You watch too much Hollywood nonsense, Ukraine has proved that western weapons are over hyped.
Clown, all tanks have a mission kill when these drones (directed shells) hit them at certain locations.... Only idiots ride volutarily in these iron coffins....
This is how the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution was intended to be used. Not because you "need" it, but because you can... and because fk you, thats why 😂 God bless & godspeed 🙏 ❤️ Semper Fidelis brothers & sisters 🇺🇸 Rah
Until now they never was in a combat situation against an army with equivalent capability. Same like F16 and F35. Like a bully that never enter in a fight only because is big until….a new kid appears and stand in the front. This is practically NATO army in this moment.
I wish we could get shows “Wings”, “Firepower” and “Tales of the Gun” but with modern video and information. Get rid of the “show host” and bring back the “Narrator” with just facts about the equipment.
The Abrams has always been something of a joke in NATO. Firstly the Gas Turbine gives off a lot of heat which is easily detected and targeted. Secondly the Abrams needs to be followed by a fuel tanker, the 65 mile range is pathetic for a modern tank. Though ammunition fires may not destroy the tank, it does require a re-build taking many months, so far 35 tanks have been battle casualties.
Cool, not that it matters when you have stealth bombers and nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers. If the states were in a full fledge war tanks wouldn’t even play a factor. They’d park a few numclear subs on ur coast and send ballistics missles from below the surface.
@@vanpearsall My info was the combat reports from Desert Storm which stated 65 miles was average on flat desert. A lot less than other tanks like Challenger which could manage 170 miles off road on internal fuel, or 230 miles with the rear aux tanks.
Roflmfao, you do know this tank didn't even last 2 months against Russia before being chased completely off the battlefield right? No? Okay cool story bro 👍 😂
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
A tank is only as good as it's crew but also what's outside of it like having air superiority, having artillery behind you, having infantry look for anti-tank missile teams. It's all about working together.
I spent the day riding an M60 tank when i fruitlessly atrempting to support them as a Combat Engineer..it was quite an experimce.
An uncomfortable crew is a less effective crew. If you want to maximise a tank's potential, crew comfort is essential.
Andrew, Every tank should have a minimum of two lazy boy lounges and a t.v.. Unless I’m wrong, a tank is made for fighting and not for lounging. If you are familiar with tanks, obviously you are not, they are also noisy and dirty and sweaty and smelly and dangerous. Not only dangerous to the enemy but also the tank crew
also inside the tank it needs, gaming consoles, macdonald, beer, grill, king size bed, blanket for 4 people
@@stanmans exactly, more space means more required armour and more required armour reduces mobility that overall, will decrease the survivability
War ain't No Picnic
I love how the Russian bots are talking bout how they 1 Abrams In Moscow and have destroyed/damaged five more. Failed to mention almost 90 to a 100 T90s have been damaged/destroyed/abandoned 8 of were captured. Also how’s it’s feel to loss almost 3000 tanks in two years of combat
they failed at invading Ukraine so now they invade youtube comment sections
Because they’re bug people who don’t care if they die
There is no 100 t90s
@@billny5575 are you dumb or just smooth brained. The Russians have been making T 90 since the late 90s starting with the T 90 a and then moving to the T 90 AK and then moving to the T 90 SD and then moving to the T 90 M which is the most modern version of the T 90 which Ukraine has destroyed roughly 100 T 90 M‘s again the most advanced tank Russia has the T 90 M look it up.
Because you guys call it game changer but it nothing,same with T90 destroy.And you think that is middle east?
The tank is an instrument in combat, the crew is what makes the tank lethal. I used to be a tank commander back in the late 90s on the M1A1 Abrams. My favorite positions is first being the gunner then being the commander. Before becoming one of the two senior positions all tankers must be proficient in maintaining the tank and the weapons systems first. As a crew the driver is the most junior position where he knows the tank commander and gunner to drive to favorable terrain and firing positions under the direction of the TC. The loader must load the main gun as fast as possible and the second set of eyes for the commander and responsible for the radios. His secondary responsibility is being the gunner if the gunner is taken out of action. Every crew member is capable of doing two to three jobs above their positions. This teaches junior members to learn and move into leadership positions in the future. The tank commander has to be technically and tactically proficient because his tank would be able to step up as Platoon Sergeant or Platoon Leader. I did enjoy gunnery during my years in Armor but the worst part is maintaining the tank has always been problematic and intensive from my experience.
Reddevil I was also a tank commander but i go way back a few years. The late 50's and early 60's. Back then the M48 Patton. 90mm and a 50 cal machine gun for the commander. A great tank for its time. It was easy to operate compared to the Abrams. The interior was painted white. A crew of four,commander, gunner, loader and driver. Keeping it clean was the biggest issue and a few bruises from getting banger around. Stationed at Ft. Knox Ky. I admire the tankers of today for their skill and dedication.
Thank you for your service Soldier. I served as a Unit Diary Clerk in the USMC 5/1990 to 1/1995 with 2nd Light Armored Amphibious
Assault Reconnaissance Battalion. (Actually 2nd AAR but that doesn't say anything to most people)
When not keeping unit training and logistics records I was the Platoon Lead for those deployed out of the back of the LAV to protect her from the flanks during refueling, investing the unknown, knocking holes through walls for us. Ect...
The 30mm chain gun we had when using its tiny SABO round was amazing, but I can't imagine the power of this main cannon.
Being featured in the first gulf war in 1991 this one a biggest beast to dealt with...
M1 isn't perfect but it's good❤
I miss it. A lot.
@@battlejitney2197they’ve fixed most flaws over the years
Is this at NTC (National Training Center CA)?? War vet here 3ID Mech. Haha I guess I should have kept watching… before I made a comment 10 seconds into the video. Drove a M2a2 Brad. I miss those years… playing laser tag (miles gear) out in the Mojave Desert.
The Abrams M 1 Tank's Power Plant is twice that of the "Tiger 1" (56 tons) & Tiger 2" (68 tons) which both used the 850 hp Maybach 12 cyl engine...🇺🇸🇩🇪
I really hope we have something better by now. I’ve been seeing this tank since I was a kid.
I’m craving a MRE right now (Chicken & Salsa or Spaghetti with meat sauce) haha. Army vet here.
I see the Russians have dragged a few to red square
Yeah,and Ukraine was ordered to pull the rest to the rear!
Why?
LOL! Read my text, I just said something similar!
Yes they have 1 in Moscow and the Ukrainains have a T-14 in Kiev
@@lexonmurray1594 And you're a 🤡
A lot more Russian tanks have been lost in Ukraine !
11:27 you forgot the tiger tanks in ww2.
29:37 Fun fact! Even though t55 is a soviet tank, writing inside of the tank is in Polish. Quick google search says Poland had licence to produce those tanks since 1964. its worth remembering Poland was behind the iron curtain until 1989.
T-55 guy said lenin said stalins line of “quantity is a quality of its own”
In this part of the video I remember some time ago that the Army has a new tank but I have a friend who was in a tank and that the tank commander thought it was funny to drive through buildings just for fun and I think that it's just plain sick or stupid but I like watching battle videos to understand battle strategies like when I was in high school 3 years ROTC.
Great video thanks
You have to love American marketing. The russians are using the M1A1 Abrams as target practice, but still, for the yanks, this is the BEST tank in the world. Ask the Merkava what it thinks about that.
I play a lot of tank games, every tank game known. I wanna be a gunner now lol
Don't you love it when the bots try to troll but they conveniently leave out how bad they're own tanks are doing.
IKR? The Russian tanks have been blown up by the literal thousands. To top it off, they are bragging about parrading M1A1's around... the tanks from the early 90s. The M1A2s and the SepV3s are much better.
@@00tree id personally hate being in a t 70 or 80 and coming up against a A2. There's quicker and less embarrassing ways to unlive yourself. Lol
they get a cpl western tanks and thats a W for em,but they dont mention the countless they lost,I think thats hilarious
@@00treewhat’s even funnier is that ukraine captured two T-90s a year ago. Russias best tank but somehow think its made up and ”western propaganda”
The Russians didn't claim their tanks were superior. It is you guys who said NATO tanks are invincible and game changers. And what happened now to your gold standard weapons?
Running over the Taxi, We are farmers!! lol.
nice tank, but i'll still be loyal to my country tank, the Leclerc, he's a real beauty also
And what country is that ??? Mexico 🇲🇽
@@G-Man-half-life French Tank. The name kinda gives it away, unless you're trying to be a smartass. AND the LeClerc is a badass tank. Not as good as the Abrams, but a great tank.
Both are great tanks
29:32 it's a Polish T-55 due to PL inscriptions:)
All good until the “other guy” gets the equivalent of a Thunderbolt A10. . .
Russia is smoking abrams!
All good until you fight a near peer!
Its called the Frogfoot,
No need for Su-24 (Frogfoot) or KA-52 (Alligator) or drones, simple Kornet does the trick (man portable, Russians are mounting them even on buggies)...
@@josephk1934 And how would the much newer T-90M fare? because I have over 200 pictures to show how that would go...🤣🤣🤣
Friendly reminder: This video was first published before the Russo-Ukranian War, before inexpensive drones were implemented to destroy modern multi-million dollar MBTs
I wanted to add the same. The Abrams get f.cked up like all the others...
Time of Tanks is over. What ever how much powerful it is.. Drones are the future.
Future heavy tanks will adapt to drone threats. I disagree
4:27 why did you add diesel sounds to a tank with a turbine engine???
The track on the right side of the M1 is a little farther ahead of the track on the left side because of the torsion bar suspension which causes the track on the right to wear out faster than the track on the left...how does that make sense? Both sets of tracks still go over the same terrain don't they? So why does does one side wear out quicker just because it's a little ahead of the other? If my feet walk 10 miles, my right foot isn't going to be hurting a little more than my left just because I start with my right foot.
...that guy has been in the army for 16 years and he's only a sergeant first class?!?
Watching this after getting my first Abram tank in warthunder (m1a1 hc clickbait). So excited to unleash my 1 death quit toxicity in high tier😊😂
Tuned it off as soon as I heard this guy
Honestly I'm sure he hates southerners
I just watched a Doc and it showed Gen. Montgomery who was British through and through and his personal weapon for protection throughout the war, that he kept at arms reach in every vehicle he traveled in was the American made M1 Carbine.
I think the atom bomb changed the world and not the Abrams
I know those warnings exist but I've been trying to ignore them
All of this comes at the cost of weight. The M1 is fattest tank in the world pushing almost 80 tons. It can't cross most bridges and transport planes can barely carry just one M1 because it's so heavy.
The US military is desperately trying to find ways to shave off weight for future versions of the tank because the weight has become a big issue.
Bridges in Ukraine are rated to 45 Tons... for a reason...
Me too
the M1 isn't the fattest tank in the world, the Challenger 2 is heavier
@@nuttyjawa - the Challenger 2 comes very close, but the Abrams is still a few tons (about 3 to 4 tons) heavier.
@@TheBigExclusiveWith all additional armor packages fitted, the Challenger 2 weighs in at about 83 metric tons.
Always satisfying to hear a snake-eating crunchy realize being a tanker is harder than it looks. Forge the Thunderbolt, boys!
Challenger 2
Had it gone hot in the 1980s it would have been the T72.....which would have been creamed by NATOs most powerful tank....you guessed it....the British Chieftain MBT, manned by the best tank crews in NATO....GOD SAVE THE QUEEN (as it was then)🥰🥰🥰🥰
Do you guys think we're close to inventing a way to move all of the Chinese people to another planet?
We are so back 💪🏻💪🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
No Tank can Survive Lacent Drones
General Patton would have a tear running down his cheek if he saw how perfect the Abrams is.
It has quite a few flaws
hahaha another clueless female
They have been removed from the battle front to the rear because they have been roasted in Ukraine
@@EsromNhira-vw1vqfour abrams lost in 2 months. Russia lost 2000+ tanks in 2 years. That’s 2000 tanks in 730+ days which means russia lost several tanks a day compared to one abrams every couple of days/weeks. Who is getting toasted again orc?
@EsromNhira-vw1vq Only in yourwet dreams. Scavengers in the Middleast are still picking up smaller puddles of 🇷🇺 junk
The German Leopard is better, also M1 has actually got its concept from Leopard.
German armor was much better then any American tank, they created the most lethal and feared crews in history
There are serious contenders that are better than the abrams
T-80, and Leopard 2
How do you know this? There's been a news blackout since the beginning.
I started to watch this and then realized who was hosting it
I need more Will Willis!!!!
not as easy as driving a car
A teeny tiny lancet can make this hyped tank in to a rusty junk
Anything can make anything else into rusty junk. It all depends on the crew, and you need to have more than one tank to provide a wider ark of fire.
Is that what we called the Iragis, "near peers?"
my fav tank.
It was an informative and wonderful description of Abrams tank characteristics balancing amongst firepower, accuracy, speed & fast minnuvoraity. Thanks for sharing
What’s the difference between tank & tank destroyer? Armour? Gun?
Gun. Tank destroyers use a higher velocity gun with Sabot “sounds like say-bow” ammunition.
@@SpicyLunarDust That is incorrect. Tanks use sabot rounds just as much as tank destroyers could or would. A tank destroyer typically uses a larger main gun that doesn’t fit inside a mobile, rotating turret. It’s basically an anti tank gun with some tracks slapped on it and a bit of armor at the front.
@@fizzmoe9846 It’s extremely vague but not wrong. There’s so many different facets to this, tank destroyers aren’t just limited to Sabot ammunition, there’s also HEAT, APFSDS-T, APDST, AP, and a number others. The Sabot just being the plastic around the projectile as it fires. There certainly are plenty of fixed gun tank destroyers, actually most were, but not all tank destroyers are fixed gun. And as far as increasing the caliber of the weapon, again that does happen, but what designates a tank destroyer is its Muzzle Velocity”. The US considered the M4A3E8 a “Tank Destroyer” but it only had a 1mm increase from its 75mm gun (still a huge difference), but the muzzle velocity was almost doubled.
drones and motorcycles are gaining popularity in us special forces
*Challenger tank enters the chat*
There’s like 100 of them while there’s 10,000 Abram’s
British manufacturing will never be able to compete
Successfully challenged and defeated in Ukraine months ago😅
@@THB1945
One hit a mine but was recovered 😑
@@barbararice6650 How come the turret lifted off ?
Correct. That is a T-55AM1
I love this show. Wil is awesome! You should publish Special Ops with Wil Willis!
Imagine having aim bot on a 120mm cannon that can drive 40mph and is almost indestructible 😅 “it’s kind of cheating”….he is not wrong 😂😂
One of the best tanks ever . Constantly battle tested and proven. Cant really get any better than a modern M1 Abrams and its crews .
If you only want to go 70 odd miles, don't want cross bridges ant don't want to give off a heat signature that says hello I am here
In SETC the Abrams was consistently outperformed by Leopard 2s.
you actually being serious ..stop watching propaganda and do some research lol
@@Bob-el7rl aww . Are you that uneducated or just another hater ? Son I know tankers . I know our military and logistical machine. We field the best if not constantly amongst the best. Why is that opinion, fact a constant ???? I'm waiting....
@@DarkKatzy013 why does it have BRITISH armour ..coz you take from the best :)
it has awful range ..takes a huge team to keep them running etc etc .. it is an awesome tank i dont dispute that ..the best tho .. nope ..im not saying the challenger is better ..that too has its flaws .. i would say the current leopard is the better of the lot
Isn't the leopard ranked #1 worldwide?
Ranked No.1 as the most destroyed tank supplied by NATO in full name
@@THB1945eating that russian propaganda as breakfast buddy??
@@lvdv4645
The Russians actually knocked out six leopards in a single engagement and dragged a few to red square
@@lvdv4645 Not the brightest bulb, Leopard is now near extinct,.
@@maryginger4877 Where are the T-14s?
We should gamify remote drone warfare with open access to the public
Ukraine has been trained in combined arms, killweb, etc...but they are using old Soviet era tactics and drones are able to take out the Abrams. At least two were due to blast door being left open.
Your point?
Any vehicle in battle will eventually suffer loses?
How do you know they were left open? It’s an automatic system.
I don't think your title to this video is accurate. Considering how poorly the Abrams is doing against the Russians in Ukraine.
I loved watching you fold. It puts regular poker nights into better perspective. You don’t get those good hands all the time.
Old series, produced in 2000s, I see US army soldiers wearing UCP pattern uniform , few years after Iraq war. More M1 Abrams war destroyed in 2010s in Iraq by Russian ATGM, and in 2000s , Russian T90 tank no more information.
I thought these videos seemed out of date.
A good tank....but the British Challenger 2 is the best MBT in the world today, until of course the British Challenger 3 comes on line....then just leave it to us chaps....GOD SAVE THE KING😜😜😜😜
The rise of the drones the dawn and death of the tanks.
Nah, not at all. Thanks are too much of a presence on the battlefield. More than likely we will see multiple defense mechanisms develop. Also, are you forgetting that drones can be used to supplement the tanks
Tutle Tank says niet
@@maryginger4877 *Landmines and restocked 155m shells have entered the chat*
@@silverwolf122 Wondered where they went, definitely not to Ukraine.
@@maryginger4877 many videos on Telegram that prove you wrong. But I'm sure the 5 border villages near Kharkiv were worth it...putin khuilo...🤣🤣🤣
the thing is a living weakspot
The Russian and Chinese trolls can’t accept the fact we gave Ukraine a handful of FIRST generation Abrams from the 80’s, and Russia can’t replace how fast their tanks are Orbiting🤡🤣🤣🤣
PMSL - Bradley Park + Robotyne....
😂 is that what you are telling yourself to cope 🤣. Don't make us laugh. The US refused to send the new ones because they would have been destroyed just as easily as the old ones. The US has told Ukraine to remove all their takes from the front lines because of the embarrassment of watching them getting destroyed by 10 000 dollar drones. 😂 The US has also told Ukraine that no UK tanks should be sent to the front lines. 😂😂 You watch too much Hollywood nonsense, Ukraine has proved that western weapons are over hyped.
Clown, all tanks have a mission kill when these drones (directed shells) hit them at certain locations....
Only idiots ride volutarily in these iron coffins....
Lol right.
"nooooo you can't just point out how many T90Ms we lost!! look, we captured some old western leftovers from the 80s! ruzzia stronk!!!"
The M1 played 2nd fiddle to the British Challenger tank & still does
11:26
Arent these fellows splatered in the red square for all the comrades to see?
Yup, LOL!
Yeah, they’re in Red Square and the crews are alive in Ukraine, unlike Russian T series tanks whose turrets are in orbit and their crews atomized 😂
@@james-jo5julol the cre burned inside it only ashes were left😂
older versions. the advanced armour and tech was removed
@@james-jo5ju the hit was inside turret and not ammo storage, the crew is unfortunately dead
LMG episode left
The guy even said jet turbine engine so isn't that a 500 gallon jet fuel tank? Gas is what you put in your car
It will run off of just about anything....
I was on one for nine years. All we ever used was straight up diesel.
a fine machine in it's time....however it's time is over when a $500 drone can take it out....
Try a 155 howitser SP…
I'm sorry, but this guy over-hypes everything.
You’re assuming his pronouns. Wills from the commie coast. Don’t judge HIS pronouns. 🤣
So does your mom
As much as I love like the channel, he is rather annoying for whatever reason lol
You can go watch something else then . Nobody asked
😂 true story
Lol he says the armor ia secret and then tells u how its made lol.
The main armor not the add on classified armor
Leopard 2 is the best 🇩🇪👍
It's the was they are being used in uncra.
I've seen them getting wrecked by a 5 doller drone in Ukraine.
Not anymore 😂
Beast tank until the come to sirya
Nobody can equal the yanks blowing their own trumpet.
Sorry but drones make tanks obsolete now.
Turtle Tank says niet
@@maryginger4877 LET'S GO! BLYAT MOBILE BLYAT ALL OVER UKRAINE!
@@AngryBird000 Only 20% so far... after 2 years with massive numbers advantage...🤣🤣🤣
This is how the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution was intended to be used. Not because you "need" it, but because you can... and because fk you, thats why 😂 God bless & godspeed 🙏 ❤️ Semper Fidelis brothers & sisters 🇺🇸 Rah
Sooooooo who is going ti send this to gijin the abrams needs some work
M1? Weak sauce.
Until now they never was in a combat situation against an army with equivalent capability. Same like F16 and F35.
Like a bully that never enter in a fight only because is big until….a new kid appears and stand in the front. This is practically NATO army in this moment.
Beautiful "modern" Western (especially the M1 Abrams) tanks, beautifully BURN...
Ask the RUSSIANS for more details...
Ask the Ukrainians to show you the 200+ photos of newer T90M that are missing turrets...🤣🤣🤣
They were kinda the same as Germans tanks like the body looks kinda same
I wish we could get shows “Wings”, “Firepower” and “Tales of the Gun” but with modern video and information. Get rid of the “show host” and bring back the “Narrator” with just facts about the equipment.
Don't mess with the Great U.S.A. .
Ha ha ha ha the abrams is not the best and the yank army is only dangerous to it's allies
@@gowdsake7103 For an accurate depiction of the US vs russia, look no further than the battle of Khasham
Whawhawha Nazi's part Du😂😂😂
It Rine-mit-all
The Army liaison guy sounds a bit slow....
Uses high quality jet fuel jp 8 ❤❤
If it good why they with draw from battle in Ukraine
Ukraine soldiers aren't as experienced as US soldiers. Our m1a2 sep2 is one of our most advanced variants out there, and we only sent old m1 Abrams.
The Abrams has always been something of a joke in NATO. Firstly the Gas Turbine gives off a lot of heat which is easily detected and targeted. Secondly the Abrams needs to be followed by a fuel tanker, the 65 mile range is pathetic for a modern tank. Though ammunition fires may not destroy the tank, it does require a re-build taking many months, so far 35 tanks have been battle casualties.
Cool, not that it matters when you have stealth bombers and nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers. If the states were in a full fledge war tanks wouldn’t even play a factor. They’d park a few numclear subs on ur coast and send ballistics missles from below the surface.
Where did you come up with a 65 mile radius?
@@vanpearsall That was the specification 65 miles cross country. I am not sure but they may have got it up to 92 miles on the M-1A2?
@@billballbuster7186 we averaged around 150 miles, but we were mostly on paved roads, former M1 A1 tanker
@@vanpearsall My info was the combat reports from Desert Storm which stated 65 miles was average on flat desert. A lot less than other tanks like Challenger which could manage 170 miles off road on internal fuel, or 230 miles with the rear aux tanks.
Roflmfao, you do know this tank didn't even last 2 months against Russia before being chased completely off the battlefield right? No? Okay cool story bro 👍 😂
Passadina
✨🏴✨🥰✨👍✨♥️✨🤗✨.