Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Hamilton Murph 38mm Watch Review. BUT IS IT THAT GOOD?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 авг 2024
  • Hamilton Murph 38mm watch was a highly desired watch for many people. In this video I tried to review the 38mm Hamilton Khaki Murph watch, which was seen on the Christopher Nolan movie Interstellar on 2014. 42mm Murph was released on 2019 but now Hamilton released a new 38mm Murph whick will surely make the small wrists happy. Here is my handson review about Hamilton Khaki Field Murph 38mm watch.

Комментарии • 54

  • @ocb05
    @ocb05 Год назад +10

    One of the best Hamilton launched! Near perfect proportion, redesigned lugs and case dimensions, AR coating, classic yet timeless design, everything improved!

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад +2

      I fully agree with you..especially about the great proportions. Every detail now looks great to my eyes. BTW, welcome to the channel ;)

  • @robbasilio7235
    @robbasilio7235 Год назад +7

    ❤ the murph 38…no date, uncluttered dial (unlike the khaki), great proportions, long power reserve, classy font, charming piece ! Don’t care for the strap tho, but that can be swapped

  • @driver0s228
    @driver0s228 Год назад +4

    Nice review. Happy to see smaller case sizes becoming more popular.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад +1

      You and me both!... Thanks for the comment 👍

  • @RahulUrvashi
    @RahulUrvashi Год назад +1

    Duly Appreciate the humble way of presentation, subscribed, please do not lose your simple way of presenting when you have 1 million subs. Thanks and lots of love from the Himalayas

  • @steves8322
    @steves8322 Год назад +5

    Good luck with your new channel…I just watched interstellar for the 2nd time last night. Great flick!

  • @BuckNaked2k
    @BuckNaked2k Год назад +7

    A 38mm Murph? Alright, alright, alright!

  • @ozgur5961
    @ozgur5961 Год назад +1

    One of the watches in my list. Very glad to hear that 38 version is available. Thanks Erk bey for the movie, following you in all languages :)

  • @Hoppetakeyama
    @Hoppetakeyama Год назад +3

    I owned the 42mm version but I really like this smaller version.

  • @daydream31
    @daydream31 Год назад +4

    That review was amazing. Keep going Turkish watch master :)

  • @jayeyesacks1604
    @jayeyesacks1604 Год назад +8

    The price point on this piece definitely needs to come down, and hopefully it will. Other than its connection to the film (which is less so with this iteration) and its simple understated design, I'm not seeing enough that is exceptional about it to warrant the MSRP. I own two Hamiltons with the H-10 movement, both of which were sub-$500 USD. Apparently there's a higher cost associated with Hamilton listening to consumers--bit of a cash grab happening with this one.

    • @fureyhiggins3289
      @fureyhiggins3289 Год назад +2

      I personally love the watch, but you’re statement is correct

  • @therealfaintinggoat
    @therealfaintinggoat Год назад +2

    Great video. You deserve more subs so... you got mine.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      Thanks for the sub Phil! Much appreciated

  • @savollo
    @savollo 8 дней назад +1

    Price ?

  • @crackhead187
    @crackhead187 Год назад +2

    Cool watch, not a fan of the faux patina/aged look myself personally when I saw it in the flesh. Good piece nonetheless.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      Thanks for the comment Raj. Very helpful for such a new channel

  • @benmoore7946
    @benmoore7946 Год назад +1

    I want to know if there is a bracelet option for this. Either after market, or the same bracelet for the regular Hamilton Khaki field.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      Hi Ben. One of my friends tried the Khaki Field mechanical 38mm's bracelet on this one YES it fits perfectly fine!

    • @benmoore7946
      @benmoore7946 Год назад

      @@thewatchloupe Helpful! Thank you

  • @davidcrandall4958
    @davidcrandall4958 Год назад +1

    I believe the 42 mm size is important! I am all about movies! Since you don't want to give away the movie,I wont reveal why?

  • @wolfh1045
    @wolfh1045 Год назад

    Great review brother

  • @Ian_P
    @Ian_P Год назад

    I WISH IT HAD A METAL STRAP.
    I have zero interest in movie history or any of that BS, but the watch itself is stunning. Just wish it had a "matching" metal strap.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад +1

      I think the 38mm Khaki field mechanical bracelet is fitting perfectly to this case. So why not in the future

  • @ardataskirec1194
    @ardataskirec1194 Год назад

    İngilizce content sevindirdi abi. Başarılar, takipteyiz. 🥰

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      Only in English here please Arda. Thanks anyway.

  • @smura1963
    @smura1963 Год назад +1

    I got it😁

  • @aliersan5701
    @aliersan5701 Год назад +1

    Wonderfull🧿

  • @davidcrandall4958
    @davidcrandall4958 Год назад

    It should at least have had the Morse and Eureka! If you don't get it watch the movie again!

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      David I know what you mean.. I just tried not to give any spoiler on the video. You are right but in another way.. the original watch of course did not have any code on top.. I would also prefer it with a Morse code though

    • @davidcrandall4958
      @davidcrandall4958 Год назад

      Thank you Watch Loupe!

  • @omerfarukgedikaslan
    @omerfarukgedikaslan Год назад

    Ama biz Türkçe video bekliyoruz ;)

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      I don't understand what you wrote. Only in English please :)

  • @davidcrandall4958
    @davidcrandall4958 Год назад +1

    In my opinion,I dont feel this Watch is"The Murph" I've watched Interstellar 29 times,I own the DVD!

  • @edrader
    @edrader Год назад

    in the end it is a hamilton

  • @Tom_H327
    @Tom_H327 Год назад +1

    I think its laughable that a struggling farmer has the disposable income to afford not one, but two, Hamiltons. One of which is a custom one off that he just gave away. 😂

  • @MrWAZZUPJoey
    @MrWAZZUPJoey Год назад +2

    Thanks. Can you give a new Video with different Straps?

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      Thanks Johannes. I may do so. Nato straps would look great IMO.

    • @MrWAZZUPJoey
      @MrWAZZUPJoey Год назад +1

      @@thewatchloupe nice. by the way, great video quality for a new channel. Keep going.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      Many thanks. This is a new channel, but this is not my first channel :) I have some YT experience here and there :)

  • @jwillwork3683
    @jwillwork3683 Год назад +1

    Dudes talks way to much about everything but the watch. I had to leave before he even addressed the watch my time means too much to me. Get to the point bro.

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад +5

      Ok bro. But you always have the option to fast forward. Every other channel shows the watch in the end. I thought some extra info will be better. Anyway.. Your choice and I took my note about your comment. Cheers

  • @nimmichagger165
    @nimmichagger165 Год назад

    Way too expensive, and the same crappy Hamilton crystal that reflects like a damn mirror.

  • @Ferien7
    @Ferien7 Год назад

    New murph is boring, too dressy, and has no ar coating. Total 💩

    • @thewatchloupe
      @thewatchloupe  Год назад

      It has inner AR coating according to specs.

    • @UCZ15
      @UCZ15 Год назад

      Agree. I find that lots of brands release smaller versions of their watches but fuck them up by not making them as good as their bigger brother. It’s consistent in almost all brands.

    • @Sturnburn772
      @Sturnburn772 Год назад +4

      @@UCZ15 not sure how this is worse than the bigger. Objectively, it’s better in several ways. New anti magnetic properties, inner AR coating and much more universal proportions. Think before you comment something that doesn’t make any sense.

    • @Sturnburn772
      @Sturnburn772 Год назад +1

      Your wrong on several fronts here.