Scientists Finally Discover Irish Genetic Origins
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
- Situated off the North-Western coast of Europe, Ireland's geographic position promotes genetic uniformity and isolation.Research on ancient Irish genomes indicates that the current Irish genetic landscape was formed approximately 3,500 ago during the Irish Bronze Age.Significant historical migrations to Ireland include the Norse Vikings in the late first millennium, the Norman invasion in the 12th century, and the Plantations of the 16th and 17th centuries.The effect of these migrations on the modern Irish genome remains largely unknown.Y-chromosome and mitochondrial haplotypes common in Ireland show genetic continuity with those found in other western European populations.
Research Link
www.nature.com/articles/s4159...
He never mentioned that Dublin 7 had the highest percentage of fair haired, blue eyed people in the country owing to the original Viking settlement there😁
😂 they put the typical Angol Saxon fair-haired (Aryan) specimen in the frontispiece. However, dark brown hair is the predominant hair colour in Ireland. All the dark-haired James bonds are of Celtic stock and all the blonde blue-eyed James Bonds are of Anglo-Saxon garbage Iranian stock
No they are Jackeens.more to do with the UK
Fingal - fionn gall - the blonde foreigner.
Now the genome is mainly Africa and Asian
@@orionxtc1119lol.
Scientists discover what the dogs on the street know
God bless you! I 😅
Culture is the main thing mate. My Irish ancestry predicates me for whiskey. Uisce Beatha
Beannachtai
@@cynicalb Slainte mo cara
This summary of genetic research, similar to many others available on the Web, is stuffed with jargon and leaves me without any knowledge of the result of research.
All I hear are lots of words, the definitions of which I am unsure or, more frequently, clueless.
For example, at the beginning we are informed that the population has been isolated for the last 5000 years. For the rest of the report, we get an unending series of discussions of mixtures.
I get how all the jargon can be overwhelming. The main takeaway from the research is that the Irish population has been quite isolated for around 5,000 years, meaning there wasn't much mixing with other groups. But, interestingly, there have been specific instances of mixing, especially with Vikings and the British.The study found distinct genetic groups within Ireland that match historical and geographical regions, showing how different parts of Ireland have kept their unique genetic identities. One interesting finding is the significant Norwegian ancestry in the Irish population, which is likely due to Viking activities in Ireland. There are also mixed Irish and British genetic groups, especially in Northern Ireland, reflecting historical migrations.
Without the "jargon" it would have been 4x longer, easily. I had to really listen to hear the jargon.
When you're listening to a video about what scientists have discovered about genetics you're going to hear a lot about *haplogroups* and *genetic clusters*.
thanks for the warning
@@evoinception The genetic results, it appears, simply confirm what we already know from well-documented history -- the Vikings invaded and occupied western Ireland; the Scots migrated to northern Ireland; the soldiers of Cromwell and other English occupiers have ruled central Ireland for centuries prior to independence.
@@meofamily4 not "we" , you can say "you know", many people are new to this genetics field and might want this info
Judging by your opening map of Europe why is there no Irish in the North East of Ireland
Go on son
Well, I believe cough, cough, there was a plantation of foreigners there ... and a lot of them are still living there.
😂
@@paulohagan3309 The population of NI is still about 50% Irish or Irish descent.
@@paulohagan3309occupiers just like those in Palestine
Irish Native here from county Cork..
Though I have no Saxon DNA some Irish here do...
I myself am Norse-Gael 🇮🇪 🇧🇻 76% Irish 24% Norwegian
The Norse-Gaels (Old Irish: Gall-Goídil; Irish: Gall-Ghaeil; Scottish Gaelic: Gall-Ghàidheil, 'foreigner-Gaels') were a people of mixed Gaelic and Norse ancestry and culture. They emerged in the Viking Age, when Vikings who settled in Ireland and in Scotland became Gaelicised and intermarried with Gaels.
It's common for people with Irish heritage to have British Isles DNA in their ancestry results due to centuries of colonization, immigration, and exploration. During the 18th century, the English established the Kingdom of Ireland and intermingled with the Irish, replacing Irish Catholics with Protestants. People from the British Isles, which includes Ireland, Great Britain, the Isle of Man, the Hebrides, and the Northern Isles, share a common genetic history and have moved around the region a lot over the past few hundred years. This means that even people with deep roots in a specific area can still have Irish ancestry in their ethnicity estimate, especially if that area is close to Ireland
You're spot on about the British Isles DNA showing up in ancestry results. Centuries of colonization, immigration, and movement within the region mean that genetic histories are deeply intertwined.
irish Descendant in Australia here- I have 67% Irish Dna and 33%Scottish. My father has 75% Irish, a smidge of English/Scandinavian and some scottish. My son has inherited 3% Scandinavian from me (although it doesn't register in my DNA). His father was english so his DNA is about 40% Irish, 6% Scandinavian, smidge of scottish and then english.. i can't remember the exact amounts either way the Irish runs strong in the blood of many aussies because the Irish Catholics only married other Irish Catholics. edited to say one of my lines is from Cork, another from Dublin, Crookstown, Tipperary and County Clare, and of course Antrim.
I have to admit that I havn't a bulls notion what you were on about but the pictures looked nice.
glad you enjoyed that part
😂
😊
I have a Gael surname. Born on Tyneside UK. My Recent DNA test revealed me to be 55% Irish. 40% Scots. 5% Germanic Europe. I have light blue eyes and Dark brown hair.
you are carrying a wonderful legacy, thanks for sharing ...
Im 63% irish 37% scottish
wonderful legacy you carry, thanks for sharing ...
@@evoinception thankyou 😁
What’s the difference
@@mackfin8869 Google it
@@mackfin8869Perhaps because they’re different countries, Irish did come to Scotland, but you have the Pictish people already inhabiting Scotland prior to the Norse people arriving. The Scottish also defeated the Romans.
There's nothing isolated about Ireland in terms of Genetics, my DNA is the same as a third of Swedish men today because I've Anglo Norman Heritage, we are very diverse and it made us better and stronger people. The Native Irish are tougher again and could not be conquered by the Normans even after the Normans had just conquered the Saxons
You bring up an excellent point about the genetic diversity and strength of the Irish population. The study indeed acknowledges that while there has been significant genetic mixing in Ireland, there are also unique genetic signatures that reflect historical events and migrations.The findings show that Ireland has a distinct genetic profile with contributions from various groups, including the Norse, Anglo-Normans, and other European populations.
@@evoinception Awesome comment, It really is a unique mix, I saw a tv Program recently about Irish Travellers who are considered to be some of the oldest inhabitants of Ireland, one Traveller man's DNA profile was common to Eastern and Central Europe particularly the Ukrainian Steppe where People first domesticated the Horse. Irish Travellers today have a great affinity with Horses.
Bollocks
Funny how we are al speaking English now isn't it Mr unconquered.
@@celticm6616 you can blame Saxon England for that not the Normans! The Normans were more Irish than the Irish, you missing my point, and no the Gaelic Irish and Irish have never been Conquered and never will be
23 and me 👍 knew I had 50% Irish ☘️ genes when it came back I was 98% Irish and 2% scandi the rest was traces from Syria 🇸🇾 and India 🇮🇳 I have pale skin freckles and curly hair 👍 lol 😂
you carry wonderful legacy, thanks for sharing ...
They put the Syrian and Indian DNA in to eff with your head. It's fake.
They is MORE irish dna in Iceland due to women taken to Iceland for breeding
Good choice!
Ok, the mystery has been solved. Beaker from the Muppets has red hair! (Sorry)
thanks for your comment ...
Does Bellina Hatty, referred to in the subtitles, equate with Ballynahatty ?
yes, referring to Irish Neolithic Ballynahatty
Has the effect of consistent genetic/ethnic cleansing in the Ulster region since 17thC been taken into account?
That's a very pertinent question. The study does consider historical events, including the Ulster Plantations in the 17th century, which significantly impacted the genetic makeup of the region. The research identifies distinct clusters with shared Irish and British ancestry, particularly in Northern Ireland, reflecting these historical admixture events.
Celts are basically paternally Y-dna haplogroup R1b. Slavs are R1a. Turks are haplogroup Q. All of them are Cimmerians, haplogroup P. Maternally, many of them are mt-dna U or H, branches of haplogroup N,,, Amazons.
My mother in law is downstream of U5. I am downstream of H6. Her ancestry ties to the oldest Irish, mine ties to the Yamnaya and the Iron Age bell beakers who went into Ireland. It’s so cool to make connections to these specific aincent migrations and peoples. We sure did push west 😅
Not really. Irish are paternally R1b-L21 but Continental Celts are very varied in their ydna. Irish get their ydna from the Bronze Age Bell Beakers not the Celts.
@@jackieblue1267Agree, the Irish have a high Indo European steppe component and the Continental Celts have higher caucus admixture more close to the Gauls
The Celts are a modern invention - In the early 18th century Edward Lhuyd came up with the theory and even if there was a unified European culture from that supposed Celtic period, we Irish had nothing to do with it anyway - Barry Raftery (1944-2010) professor of Celtic archaeology at University College Dublin, admits an enormous problem in justifying his subject: "there is no archaeological evidence for a Celtic invasion of Ireland". Over the period from about 450 BC to AD 450 when some scholars agreed that there were Celtic societies and civilisations in western and central Europe, hardly any material evidence has been found here to substantiate the notion of Celtic Ireland.
There is no Celtic pottery - or pottery of any kind until well into the Christian period. Only 40-50 such swords or other military instruments are extant, six decorated brooches, eight scabbards - compared to the hundreds of thousands excavated in western France alone. The Irish language is probably much older than previously thought - so labelling it Celtic as well is also misleading.
In fact, what both archaeology and genetic studies show is continuity - broadly the same people who built Newgrange continuing to inhabit the island, speaking a version of the language of the Atlantic seaboard from which they had originated. The first farmers moved westwards from Anatolia (modern day Turkey) populated the Iberian Peninsula before finally moving north to Britain and Ireland. There is no evidence of any change in genetics in Ireland until the arrival of the Vikings.
The Indo Europeans moved into Ireland during the Iron Age which is why their steppe composition is amongst the highest in Europe. They actually have a low caucus admixture which is why many of them burn in the sun and can't tan. Much of my own family are like that.
Very interesting video although the ai voice kept saying "Gaelics" for whatever reason.
I see there have been some criticisms about this being too complicated for the ordinary viewer to understand.
I think you were trying to bridge the gap between being comprehensive and being accessible.
But when you were trying to be so comprehensively accessible I actually think you could have spent an extra minute or two explaining certain points just a little more comprehensively and that would have actually made the whole thing a little more accessible too.
But good job overall although I did go, oh no! when the travellers ended up as a the briefest of footnotes at the very end.
I try to strike a balance between being thorough and keeping things easy to understand, but I see your point about spending a bit more time explaining certain parts. Will definitely keep that in mind for future videos.
Migrations? Aka invasions.
Excellent video!
thanks for your kind words and support to channel ...
I have a few 4+ cm SNPS in common with Rathlin 1, 2, and Ballynahatty woman, the most being with Rathlin 1. I’ve always felt the so called black Irish of Connacht were older Irish. Seeing the study validate that is satisfying. My great grandmother was born on Inishmore in The Aran Islands. I have highland DNA too from N. Uist as well, which is also part of that ancient population.
Thank you so much for doing this. It goes to show you how mixed up the west of Europe really is. It makes me feel like there is truth in the book of invasions.
thanks for sharing this info and your continued interactions with topics on channel ,means a lot ...
@@DorchesterMom
Irish are the most Indo-European country in Europe, the people go back 4000 years.
See: son of manu.
definitely agree with the black Irish going further back in history, the people who built new grange were not white skinned
@@brianbadonde8700
They were Iberians, who had populated most of Europe - Early European Farmers.
In Ireland, 98% were replaced by the Indo-Europeans (Rathlin man).
But in Britain they made a comeback and replaced half of the Indo-Europeans!
- which is why the British are darker than the Irish - Black British.
I don't know why they bother putting all the effort in to making these videos, they literally could not explain the data in a less clear way. Try breaking the videos down into smaller chunks or topics and then try to summarise what it is you are trying to say or communicate. Failing that try and communicate it to a third party and then get them to present the information. The narrators tone also is not conducive to absorbing the information.
have you ever heard, perfection is enemy of good, many people new to genetics might find this info useful, scientific research contains many terms that i try and simplify, you really think i should wait for the perfect moment to give people this info, many do find this useful right now ....
@@evoinception I'm sure the content is brilliant, but being brilliant at what you do is a different skill to being able to teach. Maybe a way to do it is get a third party someone who has limited scientific knowledge to watch your video and then get them to explain back what they have watched. I think I heard someone say or use the expression if you can't explain what you are trying to say clearly to an eight year old in ten minutes or less then you haven't explained it clearly. I have been watching a lecturer who's videos might not be as good as yours in terms of detail but it is presented brilliantly for the lay person, I will find her name
He said three and a half thousand years ago,much older than that new grange is five thousand years old,predating the pyramids of Egypt,he keeps naming English and Scottish names is he trying to say England have a claim ,
we do not use the colonial term British Isles in Ireland
I have noted your point ...
Ireland IS NOT a british isle
😅 3:50 @tomtomftube it's just geography
@@Irish780 its not geography. real geography is the island of britain and the island of ireland are situated close to each other but they are separate entities
Because the Brits ( god love them) still believe they have an empire 😁
So where did the population from 5000 to 3500 years ago originate? Is it true that there are genetic connections to the Black Sea region and even Egypt?
The population in Ireland from 5,000 to 3,500 years ago is believed to have origins linked to various migrations across Europe. Genetic studies suggest that there were significant movements of people during the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, contributing to the genetic makeup of the Irish population.There is evidence of genetic connections between ancient populations in Ireland and those from regions around the Black Sea and even further afield. Some of these migrations could have brought influences from as far as the Black Sea region, though direct connections to Egypt are less clear.
first modern humans in Europe incl. Ireland were European hunter-gatherers who moved in during the last ice age. Then, in early Neolithic, after the last Ice ended 10k years ago, Anatolian farmers started to spread to Europe from the fertile crescent, where agriculture was invented. The whole process took several thousand of years before they reached Ireland. These people were then mostly replaced in early bronze age, the period you refer to, by Indo-Europeans, in several waves. First, pre-Celtic Bell Beakers of Indo-European origin, then maybe a 1500 year later, the Celts arrived, introducing the Iron age to Ireland. Celts were mostly Ra1 central Europeans, but the Irish have some of the highest R1b y-haplogroup %, indicating the Celts may have been a rather small group when entering Ireland, and the Irish language spread via elite adoption and not a mass scale immigration. In terms of haplogroups or even blood types, the Irish are most similar to the people of the Atlantic coast of France and even norther Spain (Basque region in particular).
Interestingly the picture you have on the video looks like an archetype of the people from the Isle of Uist in Scotland. Most have broad faces, that are a little fleshy.
photographs illustrates Ireland at the very start of the 20th century. Concentrated in Co. Galway, the images depict thatched cottages, shawl clad women, small farms and barefoot children. Indeed, the poverty shown in some of the photos is striking.they are all in public domain also at united states library of congress, glad you enjoyed them ...
@@evoinception yes I seen that, I was looking at the AI generated male face, when I made the comment. I know many people from Uist and Barra which this picture reminds of.
@@outoforbit00 oh the face its not AI , the remains of this individual, dubbed SK2 by archaeologists, was found with the bodies of four other people in an open space once known as Hoggen Green, researchers used facial reconstruction software to paint a vivid portrait of one Dubliner, it waas in 2017, i do not know why every one is paranoid about AI...
@@evoinception thanks for the info, the facial recognition software is A.I. I'm not making any judgement on that.
I am an o henley I traced my fathers line to inverness 1717 apparently they came from the Shannon River and left during the time of Crowell I beleave they are o henleys/o hanleys on uist today
Check out Bob Quinn's docco Atlantean
Scots and Irish are same, they moved to both sides of sea
Not true - most "scots" come from all over.
See: Extraordinary Scottish DNA
Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps
Scottish people always say that, it's rather strange.
Western Scots are the same.
I have mostly Irish Scottish Welsh then English and Scandinavian. I also have RH blood the same as my dad and younger daughter
wonderful legacy, thanks for sharing
I am truly blessed
Im 97 % Irish and the rest welsh and Scottish.
That is some legacy as well
Many believe red hair originates from Ireland and was inherited from Neanderthals, so a video on this subject would be fascinating. My limited understanding is that no modern humans carry the same MC1R pigment mutation Neanderthals had, but not sure if this is accurate. Perhaps some interesting future content...
Basically, I’ve always heard that we inherited the red haired gene from our East Asian ancestors
the specific MC1R mutation responsible for red hair in Neanderthals is different from the one found in modern humans, so yes you are right, i will look in to this for future episodes, thanks for your interest in topic and support to channel ...
@@fishybusinessco.8398 Same here, but you'd be surprised how many still believe that myth along with the mistaken perception modern humans inherited blue eyes from Neanderthals. It's because Neanderthal portrayals often show reddish hair and blue eyes, unfortunately.
There's that russian republic with highest occurence of redheads in the world.
No, the Irish are closely related to the Dufch - and they have plenty of red hair. It must have come with the Bell Beaker people.
Anyway, the Neanderthrals were never in Ireland!
I am ukranian 4% Irish and I live in Australia, that part of my blood saves my life
thanks for sharing this info, you have wonderful legacy ...
The Last study i read claimed the irish were a mixture of slavs and Iranians.
which study you are pointing at , if you can post the link it will be interesting to go through ...
@@evoinception it was about 9-10 years ago. I'll do a bit of Googling.
@@clemfandango619 keep contributing to community here in the meanwhile, thanks
My other Grandad was a Tobbogan..he moved to Ireland but it was downhill from then on
This is all incorrect now as so many overseas people have arrived in Ireland recently 😮😮😮
True, and this applies to most of the western world and the americas
It is clearly discussing the native population, not immigrants.
They are here for welfare access purposes. Not sure how attractive that would reflect in planned or selective creation.
The climate will sort them out. They will have pale skin and blue eyes in no time.
My dna result is 80% Irish/British going back to the 1400s with ancient genetic correlations in Spain , Hungary and Scandinavia
very interesting, you carry wonderful legacy, thanks for sharing ..
it would be interesting if the DNA was compared against the ancient DNA of the Irish King and the rest of the skeletons found in the mound which is supposed to be from Egypt and reflects a Turkish invasion before the romans.
You make an interesting point, comparing modern DNA with ancient DNA from Irish kings and other skeletons found in ancient mounds would definitely provide more insights. While there are legends and theories about connections to Egypt and Turkey, current genetic evidence primarily points to migrations from Europe, especially during the Neolithic and Bronze Ages. However, analyzing ancient DNA could reveal more about these potential links and offer a clearer picture of Ireland's genetic history.
Fella to the right on the thumbnail looks like kevin de bruyne
about the thumbnail - the remains of this individual, dubbed SK2 by archaeologists, was found with the bodies of four other people in an open space once known as Hoggen Green, researchers used facial reconstruction software to paint a vivid portrait of one Dubliner, this was in 2017
So we finally know who the father was!!!!! Awesome 😎
I'm Sparticus 😊
Haha, well met, Spartacus!
Your not
Sparticus autisticus, as in the Ian Dury song
This video ignores ancient Irish history and legends, like Tuatha te Danaan: the tribe of Dan ex Israel were great traders and seafarers who travelled with the Phoenicians. The prophet Jeremiah took the Judean princess there Tea Tephi. It is a very interesting background
thanks for your perspective, this was mostly on genetics ...
My maternal family is from Donegal. my paternal side is from Cavan. I have no trace of Norwegian DNA, or any Scandinavian DNA. My DNA comes out as Northern Irish and Central Irish only. What does the author of this video have to say about this?
The presence or absence of Scandinavian DNA can depend on many factors, including the specific ancestry tests used and the historical mixing of populations. While some parts of Ireland, particularly the coastal areas, have shown evidence of Viking ancestry, it's not uniformly spread across all of Ireland.Donegal and Cavan, being more inland and less affected by Viking settlements compared to places like Dublin or Waterford, might have populations with less Scandinavian genetic influence. DNA can also be quite personal and specific to family history, so it’s entirely possible to have a strong Irish genetic profile without detectable Scandinavian markers.
@@evoinception I did 23andMe. I want to sign up for Ancestry as well. maybe that will give more details.
@@Korva_Avia yes, please do let us know about that
Scotland and Northen Ireland have very similar DNA!
This is largely due to historical migrations and interactions, including the settlement of Scots in Ulster during the Ulster Plantations.
Dont knoe where goure getting your information but Irelands oldest sport is 3,000 yrs old , we had the Aonach Tailteann , a festival held at Tara from 632BC combining games, music, dance and song, older than the Olympic games. We have monuments older than stonehenge and the Pyramids of Giza. And bodies of humsns over 5000 years old have been found all over Ireland. . So, you can get that 3,000 years out of your brain and actually study the facts first.
Ah, I get where you're coming from. The study's focus is really on the genetic side of things, looking at how the DNA has shaped up over the last few thousand years. When they mention the 3,000 years, they're talking about the genetic landscape during the Bronze Age, not dismissing the rich history. Those ancient festivals, monuments older than Stonehenge, and all that good stuff. This genetic research just adds another layer to how deeply rooted and diverse the heritage is.
@@evoinception
The heritage is NOT diverse - it is anything but diverse! - can you get your head around that?
The Celts invaded Britain in 750BC - 43 AD, before the Romans. The Gaels invaded Britain in 200 BC -500 AD.
No they didn't there was never 'Celts' in Ireland
Nonsense 😅
Why are they using all those old pre famine photos for God sake, what is wrong with using modern photos of groups of Irish people like they do in similar videos on same subject.
i like people to not forget the dark times ...
No R1A1.
Actually, R1a1 (or R1a) is a Y-DNA haplogroup that's commonly found in Eastern European and Central Asian populations, particularly among Slavs. In Ireland, the most prevalent Y-DNA haplogroup is R1b, which is common in Western Europe.
Its culture vs DNA right? Irish are a very mixed group just like the Wels, English and Scots. There have been many migrations/invasions of these Isles. They only stopped inrecent history. What makes one Irish or British does not lie in our DNA but in our heads and hearts.
Absolutely, it's a mix of both culture and DNA. While DNA tells the story of the many migrations and invasions that shaped the genetic landscape of the Irish, Welsh, English, and Scots, what truly makes us who we are goes beyond genetics. Our identities are deeply rooted in our culture, traditions, and shared histories. The sense of being Irish or British is very much about what's in people's heads and hearts. So, while genetics can give us fascinating insights into our past, it's our culture that really defines us. Thanks for pointing that out...
Spell "trouble" however you will. It's still "trouble."
what exactly is your point here ?
Im Irish and my blood line comes from Greece/Turkey.
thanks for sharing the info ...
Tou may live in Ireland, have an Irish passport, but you are not Irish
@@joseveintegenario-nisu1928 That's amazing i was borne here my entire family was borne here dating back as fare as any of them can remember but I'm not irish.
@@sadclown887 Tou know that both in Japan and in Switzerland, being born there does not grant you citizenship, just a stage permit.
An old proverb said: 'Cows are not from it were born, but from were it graze'
Citizenship is a roman empire concept, this was a bloody nation.
Communists kill by starvation, Rome killed with swords
@@joseveintegenario-nisu1928 "Tou", I am one of them, I have been living in Ireland since 1999.
I think there has been too much immigration to Ireland the last 10 years - there should be a healthy middle way
For some reason, the Irish genome is a mix as if the island was empty and French, Belgium, Norway and Denmark making up to 80% of history.
the Viking invasions brought Scandinavian genes, while earlier migrations from mainland Europe, including from regions that are now France and Belgium, also left a mark, hence you this ..
Don't believe all this stuff - the Irish were isolated for thousands of years - maybe 2% Viking and 2% Iberian is all.
I am 100% Irish. The Irish came from the Steppes and stayed there.
@@johnpatrick5307we have more than 2% nordic
I don't have any Viking, Iberian, Belgian, French or anything.
- That stuff applies in Britain, who were also colonised by the Iberians..
@@johnpatrick5307 that's you! What about everybody else?
The vikings had a slave center in dublin
So they had celt dna lost
So we are Norwegian 😅
Haha, not quite, but the Vikings did leave their mark..
👍 👍 👍 👍
thanks for the thumbs up ...
@@evoinception You're welcome. Fascinating. I'm now a subscriber. Thanks for you hard work.
@@brianquigley1940 thanks for your kind words and support , it means a lot ...
They Foundation dna from Finland In scootish bronzeage graves ok
To my knowledge, most studies of Scottish Bronze Age graves have not specifically highlighted a significant presence of Finnish DNA.
Fin and Finnigan
Got my DNA results 99.9% Irish. Central & Southern region. The other 0.01% is unidentified. Also some Neanderthal in the blood too 👍.
you carry a wonderful legacy and with some neanderthal in there as well, you are in good company ...
Gaza ?
WE now originate from Mohamad
😂
Abdul 👍
@@annarosetarot 👍
😂😂😂
You're obviously having a similar invasion in your beautiful country, Ireland(my mom is ancesterally Irish, we're American). We just need to vote out the politicians who are creating this discord...and to be SURE the vote is secure!
More ham head 😂
The video shows the current genetic landscape was formed 3500 years ago, so the Irish didn’t build Newgrange or any of the thousands of megaliths across the Island, with some dated over 5000 years old?
Maybe some of the answers are to be found in Irish mythology, even with Atlantis, but that’s a step to far for most people.
The study does indicate that the modern genetic landscape was largely shaped around 3,500 years ago, during the Bronze Age. However, this doesn't mean the builders of Newgrange and other ancient megaliths weren't ancestors of the Irish. The population that built these structures over 5,000 years ago contributed to the genetic makeup of later populations.
I pray for my beloved Ireland that the women especially and young men keep away from mixing and try to stay true to their own folks. ❤
Well, that won't help the haemochromatosis [the 'Celtic Curse'] issue now, will it?
@@paulohagan3309or the very high prevalence of genetic defects like asthma, cystic fibrosis or multiple sclerosis. Also Crohn’s disease.
Ah inbreeding, a sport the whole family can enjoy!
@@gabhanachdenogla8342😂😂
Too late, I'm here , me ma is Irish , thanks be to God.
😁 but I get your concerns.
Irish, Scotts, Germans, Brits etc all White people have one origin and that is Adam (White Adamic Man). The first of the Ancient Israelites (Tuatha De Danaan/Tribe of Dan) left from Egypt before and during the Exodus and sailed to these Isles. The White Christian peoples of Europe are predominantly descended from the Ancient Israelites in the line of Shem, others, the minority are in the line of Japheth and are mainly Eastern Europeans.
The White Adamic man has only been on this earth since God placed Adam in the Garden of Eden approx 7,000 years ago. The other races have been here far longer but the Bible does not elaborate on that.
Your information is slightly outdated!
Perhaps you should read another book
@@atheistbushman How exactly does a history of a people and their origin get outdated ? please do explain what you're new history is telling us ?
You need to do your homework mate you haven’t a clue about Irish history
Why don't you just put all of the information into language that we all understand, instead of this psuedo-science, AI voiced claptrap. It is really interesting stuff that many of us would like to hear about, but you've made it almost indecipherable with your presentation. Really a shame.
you are right i am blot on humanity ...
that might be only be a more modern take as we all know there is sites in Ireland date back to between 5000 and 9000 years ago so this is only a modern take on where the Irish came from and its origins.. no one likes to talk about the movement of the irish and the druid class pre- 5000 years ago from from west to east before their more modern return
You’re right that Ireland has some incredibly ancient sites, dating back thousands of years. Places like Newgrange, which is over 5,000 years old, show that Ireland has a deep and complex history.The study focuses on the genetic landscape over the past few thousand years, particularly since the Bronze Age. This doesn’t discount the earlier movements and cultural exchanges that shaped ancient Ireland. It’s true that the pre-5000-year history, including the movements of the Irish and the Druid class, is a fascinating and less often discussed part of our heritage. Thanks for bringing up that important point...
Contradiction;
1. Little Y chromo Viking influence
2. Yet the Irish are 20% Norwegian
Garbage. anyway, so many Irish women being raped by foreigners we'll soon be mestizo
Contrárthacht;
1. Tionchar beag Y chromo Lochlannach
2. Ach is Ioruais iad na hÉireannaigh 20%.
Dramhaíl. ar aon nós, an oiread sin ban Éireannach á n-éigniú ag eachtrannaigh is fada uainn a bheith mestizo
Bull crap.
Yes kamin in dardania you faine grevs Irish tugedher Romans and ilirian dardania skatisht
its a bit hard to translate what you said ...
@@evoinception yes Gali iliri skati is brabher
We love Irish, we love Britons, but these Islands are not Europe, same as Greenland, Iceland, are not European, Geographically.
If they’re not European islands where are they in asia africa?. Of course they’re European.
@@williamwallace4924 UK, Ireland, Greenland, Iceland, are just Atlantic Islands nearly in the Stream.
Not European, as Canary Islands, Açores, are African or just Atlantic.
Proximity is a primitive way unconscious moves qualities between different objects in building dream imagery, Sigmund Freud shown, but it are Dreams, satisfaction of desires, not reality.
That London is closer to Europe than Saint Pierre and Miquelón does not change facts, quantitative is different from qualitative, whatever marxists may have said.
Inhabitants of british and Irish Islands once were Europeans, long ago, channel did not exist, but Sea changes nature
@@josega6338 why were in the European Union?
@@williamwallace4924 Hard to understand, as any joint venture with britons is playing the pork role in a Ham&Eggs business, where UK provides the hen.
The country France had more wars with is UK, look at Jeanne d'Arc.
Too much overlap between the english and piracy and pozzi schemes, financial 'engineering'
Fa, Fe, Fi, Fo, Fum...!
God save the Queen!
Ireland and the rest of the British Isles are on the European plate and well away from the edge. Iceland in on the boundary between the European and North American plate and Greenland is on the North American plate. So, geographically, Ireland is part of Europe, Iceland is split between the two and Greenland is American.
This is mostly bullsh#t. GOBBLEDYGOOK.
I assume you refer to genetics?
@@atheistbushman , You assume wrongly. But you may "assume" whatever you wish.