I really love Emma Watson playing Belle, but Belle in the animation moves so elegant. That's what I miss in Emma Watsons performance. Still very very excited for the movie! I can't wait!
I have a feeling that fits the character better. Belle is supposed to strange, no_ The cartoon Belle seem quite well adjusted and seems to fit in quite nicely in that town except for the reading. Emma Watson's Belle seem more convincingly out of place to me.
MsHaruHana Yes, but if someone told you to act as a strong willed woman, you wouldnt act feminine. Its about defining characteristics. In acting, the intention is not to go by exceptions to a personality but to realistic representations. The animated princess-like physicality is a stretch made naturally by Disney as service, while Emma's portrayal fits the actual description more.
Oh my God. It doesn't even matter because Emma Watson sucked in this live action. This is exactly what you get when you add feminist ideals in a Disney movie. "Graceful, feminine movements" or "strong willed composure" wouldn't do shit for her rendition of Belle. Hardly any expressions or emotions at all.
@@cellyzs Because Belle being more carefree and content with her current life in her village makes it more believable that she would be angered by having to live with The Beast, for she didn't want to rid herself from her old life, but rather just escape from her boredom and have a little adventure. Remake Belle has kess reason to want to go back to her village (besides the obvious reason being her father).
Animated Version > Live-Action Version Period. Also Belle somehow made an apple materialize to feed to the mule... Does this mean Belle is magical? ....Does this mean a live-action remake of Belle's Magical World? HMMMMMMMMMMM.....
Sir Isaac people actually like the movie version. It's so stupid to listen to there arguments. How a person like the new one over the amazi g animated one. Those song really sing by talented singer. Animated one shows more emotion n give us variety of ways that a movie can never re produce those shots.
Pombonyo Productions ha ha ha... that is a funny joke you just made... Cringe? The original? Listen, some people know a good movie when they see one. If you have a problem with beautiful classics than that's your opinion. But, whether you like it or not, that cringy, out of tune singing won best score at the academy awards and the first ever (and only) animated feature nomination for best picture. Honey, when I was young we had broadway actors in my films. Watson is beautiful and the movie was pleasant. But, the original is the one that will be remembered. It won't be emma's face you see when you go to disney land, it will be the beautiful animated Belle's. Both are good in their own way, but the original is a treasure for me.
pombonyo Productions out of tune ha! at least she did not have to use a computer to make her voice better and more out there. I mean Emma Watson performance was OUTSTANDING but, the original was a master piece. cringe?? really!???? Would cringe make you feel exited, would cringe make you feel like your in another world of singing? NO, no it would not. Cringe is bad. The classic was outstanding! so next time you comment on something dont use words that clearly dont describe how "cringey" something is. Your use of " cringe" makes me "cringe". but it is your opinion not mine.
Huh. Watching this comparison makes me realize that Belle, for a person who doesn't fit in, carries herself a little too well in the original animated version. Emma Watson's portrayal better shows how out-of-place Belle is. Don't get me wrong, I'll always love the original, but I really think this new version's gonna improve areas we never thought needed improvement...until now.
You could right that is what is good about live action they can add more to a persons charector. So hopefully in this one we can see more on why Belle is a outsider to the town then just someone who reads books.
DID U NOT WATCH THE MOVIES? LOL. IN HER VERY 1ST ENCOUNTER WITH HARRY & RON SHE WAS TURNING HER NOSE UP AT THEM LIKE A KNOW IT ALL, GRANTED, SHE DID KNOW IT ALL LOL, & SHE HER INTENTIONS WERE GOOD, BUT SHE DID HAV AN EGO PROBLEM, HARRY & RON JUST OVERLOOKED IT COZ THEY WERE REALLY NICE GUYS & USED 2 BULLIES. ANYWAYS, SHE WAS PERFECT 4 HERMIONE....JUST NOT BELLE XD =)
You idiots, Hermione's character IS literally designed to be snobby. It's not an insult, it's what JK intended. She is evidently stuck up in the books and the movies but still makes a good friend because of her Gryffindor traits.
I think I prefer the live version!! Partially because I'm obsessed with the staged version and prefer that to the animated one. I also low-key wish that they included "Home" and "If I Can't Love Her"
The live action movies and photo realistic CG remakes from Disney are literally a play by by play of the original animated features. Its nostalgia marketing 100 percent.
The original belle looks so sweet and delicate in the expressions on her face and her way of walking. Emma looks very rude and inelegant.I prefer the original
Aranza Rodriguez Not being rude, but how does Emma look rude and inelegant? Not trying to start anything, I'm just wondering what your take is on the new version and the reasoning behind it.
I haven't seen the live action version, but based off this it looks pretty great. My only complain is how different Belle seems compared to her original character. I really don't like how these live action versions of Disney movies change the characteristics for the main character so much to please the public. I know that some of the really old movies could use some cleanups in view of the world, which I think cinderella did fairly well, but making Belle move, like a seven year old boy tbh, doesn't do anything really. This is just my opinion :)
The animated version will always be the best , but having a live action movie is wonderful and helps to explain a lot of things that were missing in the animated or just change some things .
Ever since the clip for the new Beauty and the Beast movie came out, I've noticed why people found so odd because during Belle's time, girls and women never had an education, and men thought that it was not right for women to have an education. What made me realize this was seeing all those boys going into the school, and those girls at the end of the clip just doing laundry
Emma's is better to me. Even if her voice was autotuned or whatever, her singing voice sounded a lot better to me, especially for that British accent in her singing! :)
Emma Watson sounds boring as Belle- she sounded really boring and didn't put any 'hympf' into her performance just now (I'm talking dialogue in general)
i know why its a little bit change cauuse disney change it a little bit so thats why its different ok so plz dont be mad at the live action the live action is still nice ok
I personally cannot wait to see this film! Belle is one of top three of the original Disney princesses. And Emma is a perfect fit for the role. Plus there is the fact that she turned down the role of Cinderella so that she could play this role. I actually think I like the live action just a bit more for the fact that she holds herself as a bit of an outsider, and for the fact that the song includes a lot more voices and parts (the village boys and girls are my fav) and the fact that she actually mentions a real book. Funny thing is I think it is a nod to the fact that in the cartoon during the song "Human again" Beauty and Beast read this book "Romeo and Juliet".
Love the live action more, somehow I just realize that the voice of belle in animated version is too shaky. Emma voice is beautiful and she portrays belle amazingly, i didn't see any hermione here just Belle 😍
You know, Emma Watson is fantastic, perfect casting. Didn't know she could sing like an angel. However, the original will always hold a special place in, I believe, all our hearts. Yet, the new movie adds slightly to romance between Beast and Bell that was lacking in the original. My guess trying to fill that run time. But over all, I think I prefer the original cartoon Candle Stick dude was better in "be our guest"
![𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐭 [𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭]🌹](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nfhteE5Euj0/mqdefault.jpg)
*NEW VIDEO: "BE OUR GUEST" COMPARISON- 2017 vs. 1991* Check it out! ruclips.net/video/ApPm3R1vfc4/видео.html
Why does she look so pissed all the time?
I really love Emma Watson playing Belle, but Belle in the animation moves so elegant. That's what I miss in Emma Watsons performance. Still very very excited for the movie! I can't wait!
I have a feeling that fits the character better. Belle is supposed to strange, no_ The cartoon Belle seem quite well adjusted and seems to fit in quite nicely in that town except for the reading. Emma Watson's Belle seem more convincingly out of place to me.
MsHaruHana, Thank you! :)
MsHaruHana Yes, but if someone told you to act as a strong willed woman, you wouldnt act feminine. Its about defining characteristics. In acting, the intention is not to go by exceptions to a personality but to realistic representations. The animated princess-like physicality is a stretch made naturally by Disney as service, while Emma's portrayal fits the actual description more.
Oh my God. It doesn't even matter because Emma Watson sucked in this live action. This is exactly what you get when you add feminist ideals in a Disney movie. "Graceful, feminine movements" or "strong willed composure" wouldn't do shit for her rendition of Belle. Hardly any expressions or emotions at all.
Shy Owl what you said was typically wrong
*NEW! Top 10 Beauty and the Beast Facts You NEED TO KNOW!* ruclips.net/video/bnuI4StLXqc/видео.html
p
TPMvids I
wow
TPMvid
TPMvids rrrz😆😁ill
I adore Emma, but she sounds more annoyed than the original who sounds more like, oh well I guess I'm different than them.
Gypsy_ Heart But that showed that Belle was a strong care free person.
@@chocov1233 Why does that matter? XD
@@cellyzs Because Belle being more carefree and content with her current life in her village makes it more believable that she would be angered by having to live with The Beast, for she didn't want to rid herself from her old life, but rather just escape from her boredom and have a little adventure. Remake Belle has kess reason to want to go back to her village (besides the obvious reason being her father).
*less.
@@chocov1233 You just said it right there. Obvious reason of being with her father.
I think Emma Watson will be amazing as Belle but she's no Paige O' Hara (Voice of Belle)...Paige is the best Belle ever! Love her voice! So beautiful.
Of course she is!
Paige o Hara has better singing voice
Animated Version > Live-Action Version
Period.
Also Belle somehow made an apple materialize to feed to the mule... Does this mean Belle is magical? ....Does this mean a live-action remake of Belle's Magical World? HMMMMMMMMMMM.....
Sir Isaac The design of the dress has pockets - she's got a pocket big enough to carry books, so the apple most likely came from there
Sir Isaac people actually like the movie version. It's so stupid to listen to there arguments. How a person like the new one over the amazi g animated one. Those song really sing by talented singer. Animated one shows more emotion n give us variety of ways that a movie can never re produce those shots.
i love both versions but the talking in the new one seems too rehearsed or fake, the original has more emotions and is quicker
Nothing beats the classic
Where are you off to?
To return this book
*is not carrying any book*
The costume designer made a pocket in the dress to hold books.
The singing is better in the old version! Emma Watsons voice is clearly auto tuned!
Alex yea but the original she's actually singing out of tune and it's cringing now compared to the new film
Pombonyo Productions ha ha ha... that is a funny joke you just made... Cringe? The original? Listen, some people know a good movie when they see one. If you have a problem with beautiful classics than that's your opinion. But, whether you like it or not, that cringy, out of tune singing won best score at the academy awards and the first ever (and only) animated feature nomination for best picture. Honey, when I was young we had broadway actors in my films. Watson is beautiful and the movie was pleasant. But, the original is the one that will be remembered. It won't be emma's face you see when you go to disney land, it will be the beautiful animated Belle's. Both are good in their own way, but the original is a treasure for me.
pombonyo Productions out of tune ha! at least she did not have to use a computer to make her voice better and more out there. I mean Emma Watson performance was OUTSTANDING but, the original was a master piece. cringe?? really!????
Would cringe make you feel exited, would cringe make you feel like your in another world of singing? NO, no it would not.
Cringe is bad. The classic was outstanding!
so next time you comment on something dont use words that clearly dont describe how "cringey" something is. Your use of " cringe" makes me "cringe".
but it is your opinion not mine.
Bonks49G K Up and Toy Story 3 got nominated for best picture.
Alex i mean, all singing is autotuned now a days, even Disney and Broadway, but that's necessary. Emma got a bit too much auto tuned.
Nothing will eva be better than the original cartoon 💜
The original was nominated for Best Picture!
I like the cartoon version, Belle’s voice is just amazing without auto tune. It’s much more satisfying again
Huh. Watching this comparison makes me realize that Belle, for a person who doesn't fit in, carries herself a little too well in the original animated version. Emma Watson's portrayal better shows how out-of-place Belle is. Don't get me wrong, I'll always love the original, but I really think this new version's gonna improve areas we never thought needed improvement...until now.
The cartoon Belle doesn't seem strange she's very beautiful. So is Emma but her Belle does seem more out of place than the cartoon one.
Hi DF :)
Yeah, animated Belle seems happy-go-lucky while live-action Belle is more responding to how the town is.
You could right that is what is good about live action they can add more to a persons charector. So hopefully in this one we can see more on why Belle is a outsider to the town then just someone who reads books.
DisneyFanatic2364 I totally agree she just feel like she out of place
she stole the bread and never paid for it
She paid for it, put a coin into the thing
In the live video she did stole it but in the original movie she didn't even touch the bread
She did paid it
roving jsin she did pay lol
There's a small cup on the baker's tray where she put a coin in while taking a loaf.
I prefer the original, but I'm still very excited to see the live action version. :D
The original is always better
Echo Magic :D no no it isn't.
ORIGINAL BELLE SEEMS DAINTY & SWEET, EMMA BELLE SEEMS SNOBBY....LIKE HERMIONE XD
=)
yeppppp
SHINBAXTER hermione ain't snobby she just knows her shit. And she's always end up being right eeverytime.
DID U NOT WATCH THE MOVIES? LOL. IN HER VERY 1ST ENCOUNTER WITH HARRY & RON SHE WAS TURNING HER NOSE UP AT THEM LIKE A KNOW IT ALL, GRANTED, SHE DID KNOW IT ALL LOL, & SHE HER INTENTIONS WERE GOOD, BUT SHE DID HAV AN EGO PROBLEM, HARRY & RON JUST OVERLOOKED IT COZ THEY WERE REALLY NICE GUYS & USED 2 BULLIES.
ANYWAYS, SHE WAS PERFECT 4 HERMIONE....JUST NOT BELLE XD
=)
You idiots, Hermione's character IS literally designed to be snobby. It's not an insult, it's what JK intended. She is evidently stuck up in the books and the movies but still makes a good friend because of her Gryffindor traits.
dont call people idiot for their own opinion
I don't understand why everyone's hating on the new movie. The new movie and the old movie are both great.
Ness1604
original one*
New one is so magical and the designs in the castle original is... I.. Did not watch yet...
I know, people are just shallow like the townspeople
TPMvids has been the best Disney YT channel I found!
I think I prefer the live version!! Partially because I'm obsessed with the staged version and prefer that to the animated one. I also low-key wish that they included "Home" and "If I Can't Love Her"
The live action movies and photo realistic CG remakes from Disney are literally a play by by play of the original animated features.
Its nostalgia marketing 100 percent.
The original belle looks so sweet and delicate in the expressions on her face and her way of walking.
Emma looks very rude and inelegant.I prefer the original
Aranza Rodriguez Not being rude, but how does Emma look rude and inelegant? Not trying to start anything, I'm just wondering what your take is on the new version and the reasoning behind it.
She nice everyone in the town is rude
paige is better and will always be better in my opinion, okay?
Old one..
I haven't seen the live action version, but based off this it looks pretty great. My only complain is how different Belle seems compared to her original character. I really don't like how these live action versions of Disney movies change the characteristics for the main character so much to please the public. I know that some of the really old movies could use some cleanups in view of the world, which I think cinderella did fairly well, but making Belle move, like a seven year old boy tbh, doesn't do anything really. This is just my opinion :)
I adore Emma's voice in this song but I prefer the 1991 animation. Also the Baker's voice IS DAMN AWESOME.
Do both songs actually go at the SAME EXACT pace or is it editing magic?
Why Emma stomping at the end though? Belle doesn't stomp.
Emma is such a good singer
RoyalWolf 2000 Autotune.
The animated version will always be the best , but having a live action movie is wonderful and helps to explain a lot of things that were missing in the animated or just change some things .
The tempo is slightly slower.
+Jake Rutigliano the animated tempo was taken down to 94% to match up
I realized that there are more extras in the new movie -sean
The portrayal of Belle by Emma Watson is amazing, just like Paige O'Hara's voices.
this was amazing
Emma Watson is not Belle. She just isn’t
Ever since the clip for the new Beauty and the Beast movie came out, I've noticed why people found so odd because during Belle's time, girls and women never had an education, and men thought that it was not right for women to have an education. What made me realize this was seeing all those boys going into the school, and those girls at the end of the clip just doing laundry
This shows that Disney was really trying to stay true to the original Beauty & the Beast & they did it.
Emma's is better to me. Even if her voice was autotuned or whatever, her singing voice sounded a lot better to me, especially for that British accent in her singing! :)
Did the trailer for beauty and the beast come up when you were trying to watch this for anyone else? 😂
i perfer the original!
So do i!
I personally prefer the live-action one. I like Emma Watson's singing.
It's auto-tuned.
original idk why but they are both amazing as each other
I admit the original Belle sings way better, but the songs like the mob song is better than the original, more exciting
i love this
nice thanks
Emma Watson win this one
P.S This is my opinion plz no hate
Hearing Emma say “Always” breaks my heart honestly
* HP fans knows what I’m talking about *
I think I just broke my replay button😂🤔🙈🙉🙊
#sorrynotsorry!
I do love Emma Watson but I still prefer the original cartoon to the live action remake. ❤ Virginia
Saw the movie... Spectacular is what I have to say, bonjour.
Emma Watsons singing voice is like an angel.
This is hard to choose now....the 1991 is amazing, 2017 looks amazing to...
I saw the movie and I want to see it again!!!! SO BAD ITS SO GOOD
Animation was the best in every way. This movie sucks
I like the original one but the remake is even better
Emma Watson aced the character of Belle
I liked both equally
Neat!
WHY IN TARNIATION DID I SEE THE BOSS BABY AD AT THE BEGGINING AND HE WAS PLAYING WITH A CANDLE AND A CLOCK?!?!?!,
Emma Watson sounds boring as Belle- she sounded really boring and didn't put any 'hympf' into her performance just now (I'm talking dialogue in general)
love how in the 2017 theres kid singing when in the old theres only one people
1:25 and no denying that even though she nearly stepped on their laundry the young girls are all in awe of Belle and want to be just like her
Paige o hara is belle Emma Watson was good but 1991 belle is the best
#1 Draco Malfoy fan Finally someone on here agrees w me!
i know why its a little bit change cauuse disney change it a little bit so thats why its different ok so plz dont be mad at the live action the live action is still nice ok
the live action is better, it has Emma Watson in it
Emma Watson can sing really well!
babyfnaf mlp lover It's the auto tune
Pegasisters21 beyond
yea! well enough for a counterfeit belle! 😃
I love the original
I prefer the real version in comparison to the Disney version
Lmfao the only thing I see in the live action one is heromine granger
I like the new version
Who else watched the live action while listening to the animation audio and vice versa?
the cartoon is better
Emma's belle is way more weird and definitely looks like she doesn't fit in but i like the original song better but they are both equally great
I personally cannot wait to see this film! Belle is one of top three of the original Disney princesses. And Emma is a perfect fit for the role. Plus there is the fact that she turned down the role of Cinderella so that she could play this role. I actually think I like the live action just a bit more for the fact that she holds herself as a bit of an outsider, and for the fact that the song includes a lot more voices and parts (the village boys and girls are my fav) and the fact that she actually mentions a real book. Funny thing is I think it is a nod to the fact that in the cartoon during the song "Human again" Beauty and Beast read this book "Romeo and Juliet".
Love the live action more, somehow I just realize that the voice of belle in animated version is too shaky. Emma voice is beautiful and she portrays belle amazingly, i didn't see any hermione here just Belle 😍
23mecy23 Her voice is auto tuned, did you know?
yes
new one looks better than the original
...Couldn't they at least have taken some liberties with the songs?
I sang her in 2017 a lot in everyday if I woke up
Why is it repeated... ohhhhhhhhh never mind
Magnifico
You know, Emma Watson is fantastic, perfect casting. Didn't know she could sing like an angel. However, the original will always hold a special place in, I believe, all our hearts. Yet, the new movie adds slightly to romance between Beast and Bell that was lacking in the original. My guess trying to fill that run time. But over all, I think I prefer the original cartoon Candle Stick dude was better in "be our guest"
DoctorNerd I Agree. Animation was a True Classix and is a Disney Title i would Reccomend to anyone.
Obviously 2017 wins come on guys it's more energetic and it's Emma Watson you can't deny that woman she's so pretty!!!
Doesn't really look like Belle though- There isn't any energy in the new one. Just looks like a high budget high school play.
I choose the new one
Emma wastons voice😍😍
0:57 Exactly
Ugh, why couldn't they just dub her singing voice?
I just got a BATB trailer before this :/
They sound the same
Emma Watson's voice freaking ruins this.
The new one is alot better
I like the new
I think the 2017 version is way better
love the brittish
Both
Emma Watson
Hmmm I'm not sure about this
Faith Perez I know! Both signings are great! But the cartoon sounds like it has NO auto tune.
Emma es muy bonita para ser Bella.