'The Space Race' ULTIMATE SURVIVAL CHALLENGE (USC) ('Winners' get to have their species continue to exist further into future eternity) * Modern science claims that there have been 5 mass extinction events already on this Earth. * We might be in the 6th now due to Earth's magnetism issues. * Modern science also claims that the Sun will wipe out all life on this Earth one day if not even the entire Earth itself. Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey. * Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself. * The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. Galaxies come into existence, with eventually new life in them, which then those galaxies most probably collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating a new galaxy with new life in it, eternally repeating. The universe is most probably going to always actively exist in some form and will not end in a big freeze. 'Winners' get to continue to survive potentially throughout all of future eternity. Good Luck Earthlings! Game On! (NOTE: In the event all life dies and goes extinct, this USC, as well as all of life itself, real and artificial, automatically become null and void as there would be no life left to care.) SURVIVAL HINT: Combining energy in all the ways that energy can be combined, and one would have all the things that could ever be created from combined energy. It's also like take a language and put it together in all the ways that language could be put together. Sure, one would get huge amounts of junk, but also the greatest wisdom and all the greatest speeches would be in there too. One just has to discern the greatest wisdom and greatest speeches from all the junk that could be expressed by that language. And what is 'language' anyway but energy combined in a certain form?
Note to all: My comment posted for this thread has been hidden. To see it: 'Sort by' up above; Select 'Newest first'; Scroll down to this thread and select 'replies'. Enjoy. The Space Race is on.
Thought provoking and obviously well researched. Some people delight in poking holes in your content. They should start their own channels. I appreciate your hard work and quality production.
Anything political will be criticised, I think this video was mostly unbiased, but I do think that the general western audience recognises too little of how much the Soviets helped with spaceflight, where it is unfortunately assumed the space race had a decisive victor. This is a good video but there's nothing wrong with criticism as it is not just purely stating facts.
Great comment. Keyboard warriors that love to criticize other’s work are so annoying, rude, and utterly lack social skills. Those who genuinely offer a different perspective and point of view are welcomed by everyone. Those who just love to hate on someone’s work for no reason are just projecting. Free speech is free speech, it’s just too bad when some abuse the privilege of being born with that right. Better people than they made it possible for them to take that right for granted. They seem to forget the responsibilities that are intended to go with their rights. I’m sorry to say I do it myself often enough.
@@janfilby7086I don’t disagree, especially when viewing documentaries of the Soviet Space Program after so much Soviet information was made publicly accessible. I find it remarkable when authors can remind me of the humanity of Soviet engineers, that Soviet citizens lived with a fear of the West (along with a fear of their State), that Soviets took great pride in their achievements. The Soviet Empire was much more than just an evil machine that cranked out weaponry, bent on our destruction, which is what I had been indoctrinated into believing since I was a teenager in the 80s. Although to be fair, just because it was propaganda and indoctrination didn’t mean a lot of it wasn’t true. As the poet Billy Joel wrote, “The Russians love their children, too.” Ok, sorry, this got a little more dramatic than it needed to be.
@@janfilby7086 Thanks to US Sanction of Russia in March 2022, future Space Program will be lead by Russia and China. Proof: the ISS is no more after 2027.
Why? It's going great without them. The ISS has more crew capabilities than ever with three separate capsules and will go until the end of the decade. The Chinese have their own space station themselves. The long march 5 B would take a payload penalty if it took the modules to the ISS, anyway. I really don't see the problem.
@@dl2839 You forgot to mention the part about how they simply can't be trusted on any level. They love to spy and lie, and they have zero hesitation about swiping and/or copying others technologies and intellectual properties. This all plays a very large role in why they were not allowed to join and it is actually not a big secret either...that information is out there to be looked into for anyone who cares to. No idea how anyone could view leaving them out as a big mistake. They don't innovate. They don't regulate. They don't...or didn't even have their own technology and ability to produce simple ball point pens, like, they literally had to have the ball tips imported from Germany and others until very recently, and that too is 100% factual and can be looked into as well.
@@dl2839Maybe technically, but it wouldn’t have hurt diplomatically to have the Chinese as a Freedom member, even if “Chinese” and “Freedom” generally don’t go well together. For example , it was good PR and really helped diminish people’s fears of the USSR to have the Apollo-Soyuz program during The Cold War. Who knows - it seems there is WAY less national pride nowadays with our younger generations, so any kind of joint effort with the Chinese would probably go unnoticed anyway. As long as their Amazon packages from China get shipped on time, they’ll have no concept or care of geopolitical issues.
The iss was all about learning about long term space. What happens when you are in space long enough to visit another planet? Apollo gave us more questions than answers. It showed us what we didn't know. Questions we didn't even know to ask before we went to the moon
10:17 not true, they were just more efficient. The Soviets made most of the achievements up until the American moon landing. The Americans focused on redundancy, while the Soviets focused on reliability, so this could be a reason for looking less advanced. The Soviet space missions were often exceeding or on par with American space missions.
In the 1980s, the Soviet Union and the United States took the first steps in building their own space stations, but were ineffective in establishing a long-term station around the Earth. Meanwhile, the European Space Agency (ESA) also began participating in the space race and developing its own research satellites and rockets such as Ariane 1.
and yet, today, thanks to USA NASA & the European ESA, China is the leading into Space Station, land on Moon & Mars today. Fact check it.... Tiangong space station; four landing on Moon; Rover(s) on Mars.
Space stations have a limited lifespan. I do not know all the metrics of this. Space stations degrade. It seems like to a certain point it is more cost effective to launch a new module than to refurbish an old one.
I'd rather have all-new, but I like the idea of using the existing ISS as a place to live and work while the new station is being built as an annex to the original. Once completed, the 2 would separate and the new station would be the only one actively being used. Similar to staying in a camper next to the new house you're building.
They are kinda doing this. There is a private space station company founded by former NASA guys that have the rights to attach their modules to the ISS. Using it's life support at first, but then eventually having their own life support and detaching from the ISS at the end of it's life cycle.
Not possible because all the moduleaterials have no guarantees anymore ! The ISS .has done it and there is no any prolong for this famous orbital laboratory ! 2030 is it's final end ! Period !
Most of this particular video is just American exceptionalism bs. Ignore most of the points on how "worse" the Russians were. Russia was on par to the US, and exceeded in most cases, especially on achievements.
My dad worked in military related aerospace up until the 90's. He was of the opinion that US was doing a handout to Russian engineers to prevent them from going to other hostile countries like China, Iran, etc.
The Americans were vastly behind the soviets during most of the space race. They only caught up after developing the Saturn 5, which was a miracle it got off the ground.
@@MasonAlex-f9pThe Saturn V was one of the most successful rockets in all of space history. It never failed once, this was no accident, it’s good engineering and extensive testing.
Extensive testing is not completely correct, it's more like throwing random crap at a problem instead of finding a solution. NASA engineers have yet to resolve the issue of uneven pressure distribution, a frequent cause of engine explosions. Rather than investigating a solution, they attempted to counteract the problem by increasing the pressure of the fuel entering the nozzle cooler, leading to significant cost overruns amounting to 15 million dollars. This contrasts with Roscosmos, who had figured out that adding more, smaller combustion chambers solves the problem. Also, I didn't call it an accident.
@@politicsuncensored5617 You basic fool. You believe your own government propaganda and then repeat it on RUclips. Basic. Russia tried to join the EU and Nato. Instead Nato kept playing cold war games. The impearlist West, projecting as always, supportiled by their poorly educated and easily misled populations.
Hey... Ich bin 18 und neu in der Geschichte oder habe neu die Liebe zur Geschichte gefunden. Ich habe meinen Großvater danach gefragt, aber er hat mir eine Erklärung gegeben, von der ich nicht glaube, dass ich sie wiederholen kann.... Warum machen es den Menschen im Laufe der Geschichte Juden schwer? Und haben sie es verdient?
Next step needs to be an O'Neil Cylinder that can be used as a long term living and construction facility with artificial gravity. A moon base should only be for mining. We need one big enough to be used as a space hanger. The biggest cost (and danger) of space travel is getting off a planet. Planets are so volatile and unstable, we should not even waste time and money on them. Mars is cool, but will never make a good living place and moons are better for mining. Even if we invent Star Trek Level propulsion systems, planets will still only be good for tourism. Also, spinning space stations will eventually be needed for large populations to escape large scale planetary disasters, such as moon sized asteroids and nearby supernovas. Even our own sun is going to destroy earth eventually.
@@BrianKelsay Dude, do you want the video titles to be written the way YOU like them? Start your own channel, write your own video titles. Problem solved. You're not helping by whining.
Long road... getting from there to here it's been a long time but my time is finally near I will see my dreams come alive at last and I will touch the sky no they're not going to hold me down no more no they're not going to change my mind cuz I've got faith of the heart
It was a different time. Nowadays we can see 16 different angles of Starship lifting off.....the booster coming back and even Starship reentering the atmosphere.....live as it's happening. There are probably a lot of still photos of astronauts working to put the ISS together......but keep in mind that those people were very busy and probably not a lot of time to take old fashioned video.
You folks are really wedded to the notion that ISS will soon be retired. I really want to challenge that notion head on. The ISS is a sustainable, habitatble work space, with plenty of capacity for laboratory work, or any other purpose its managers can adapt that space for. It's about to have major upgrades in the form of Axiom Station. It will become exceedingly obviousw to Axiom that continuing to maintain physical contact with ISS is a much better idea than throwing it away. There's also the real, operational need to discover just how durable our human-rated technology is. The Voyagers have been out there for half a century. Hubble, 35. If you remembver MIR, that station was knocking at Heaven's door for a considerable period of time whilst still being visited by Soyuz and Shuttle crews. LEO Stations have the lunxury of a planet-wide parts bazaar capable of sending new parts up as needed. A trip to Mars is either bring a whole spare-parts warehouse with you (note to Elon), or you fabricate the needed hardware from what you brought with you. Regenerative cannibalism (c). Plus, give Alpha its due. She will be a grand old lady for many decades to come.
I wonder if Spacex Starship has been considered to launch models for a new space station. Allthough not perfected yet, they could launch huge modules for the next generation space station.
The wall came down in 1989. That is the year in which communism is considered to have collapsed. 1991 was when the struggling Soviet government finally imploded.
"There was more politics involved than you think..." OF COURSE there was tons of politics involved! 😉Lofty idealistic goals are great but a project like this, especially when they involve ongoing cooperation between *_rival states,_* just doesn't happen without tons of politics!
The iss should have been built to rotate... If the iss had the ability to rotate it would help generate artificial 1g earth gravity for the astronauts so instead of them floating their feet would be firmly on the floor and they can walk freely while on board the iss.
That wouldn't work...rotating ISS would be difficult to keep in orbit because it's basically falling towards earth at a slow pace and you need to push it up every now and then...also the rotation has to be quite fast in order to be 1G...there are reasons it's not done, it's whole impractical for the shape of the ISS, most of the proposed rotation artificial gravity generators or large diameter wheels because that works the best.
That would be problematic. In the astronauts are experiencing 1G, so would the various modules. The connections between the modules would need to hold the full weight of the modules, rather than just being strong enough to keep the air pressure in the modules from forcing them apart.
The ISS is too small to rotate and get 1g while also being a comfortable experience for the astronauts. That would also have made it more expensive, which is problematic for obvious reasons mentioned in the video.
It's a research ship that specifically was for zero-G experiments. The whole point was not for a replication of gravity. A new one that rotates ought to really be being built/sent up now though. A more understandable design flaw to point out would be there was no plan to push the ISS into a higher and more stable orbit to preserve it for future generations.
Bit of Bias there? Small & primitive? The Salyut space stations were pretty much state of the art for the 70s and they built & launched 7 of them Skylab on the other hand was a repurposed Saturn 5 3rd Stage fuel tank (Which is why it was so roomy inside the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon not LEO) and they only built one of them whereas the soviets improved they design with each iteration eventually building Mir and then the Russian segment of the ISS.
So with the current political situation, does Russia still have keys to the ISS or even the Zarya module? Or has the international space community changed the locks?
What I thought US relying with what you called as old tech! when incompetance of west for built sustainable space station will not happened if no help from russia
Dude we know the usa and russia had to come together in space and built a space station because of extraterrestrial life somebody have to watch the earth 🌎 from above, greetings from the imperial city cusco the southern hemisphere amazon descendents
the Soyuz is primitive indeed, but also reliable because it can be operated without electric energy, if this would happen. i think this is the advantage why it stays on the iss til this day. also be mentioned the Russians or former the udssr had set the reliability and functionality over features and complexity, so this outcome was predictable. i know some things was bad from the beginning but like the first home computers in russia. they worked but the quality of the materials were bad.
That was president Obama, missing the opportunity to bring the cooperation up to a higher level. And it got even worse. Now it may rather take some time, before history reveals another chance for peace. 🚀🏴☠️🎸
Typical NASA short sighted what of a replacement or will they wait until it is no longer usable and then have no space station for many years also the current iss was only possible with shuttle
Russia is part of Europe, culturally and historically. America dedicates much energy to splitting europe into factions. Not the least by physical invasion. Russia was definitely Russia following the November revolution and has survived assaults from all sides ever since. America decries all socialist and secular states. This documentary is interesting to those of us who lived through the space race but risks being seen as crude propaganda as the presenter rants against the commies and even when giving grudging recognition manages to sound thoroughly condescending. Makes me think that the Yanks are as brainwashed as the Ruskies are supposed to be.
I'm puzzled that the USA couldn't build a space station on their own and needed collaboration with Russia and other countries. China built the Tiangong space station and it's a remarkable piece of engineering. Tiangong is far nicer and more elegant than the I.S.S. Cohesive. Well-designed. Thoughtful. Imagine if China and USA collaborated on future space projects. It would be fantastic. Unfortunately, the Americans are too jealous and prideful and arrogant to cooperate with the Chinese.
![Jack Harlow - Hello Miss Johnson [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q86_nlRoIGw/mqdefault.jpg)
Head to Perplexity to see the answers discussed in this video perplexity.yt.link/VJVwUh6
'The Space Race'
ULTIMATE SURVIVAL CHALLENGE (USC)
('Winners' get to have their species continue to exist further into future eternity)
* Modern science claims that there have been 5 mass extinction events already on this Earth.
* We might be in the 6th now due to Earth's magnetism issues.
* Modern science also claims that the Sun will wipe out all life on this Earth one day if not even the entire Earth itself. Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey.
* Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself.
* The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. Galaxies come into existence, with eventually new life in them, which then those galaxies most probably collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating a new galaxy with new life in it, eternally repeating. The universe is most probably going to always actively exist in some form and will not end in a big freeze.
'Winners' get to continue to survive potentially throughout all of future eternity.
Good Luck Earthlings!
Game On!
(NOTE: In the event all life dies and goes extinct, this USC, as well as all of life itself, real and artificial, automatically become null and void as there would be no life left to care.)
SURVIVAL HINT:
Combining energy in all the ways that energy can be combined, and one would have all the things that could ever be created from combined energy. It's also like take a language and put it together in all the ways that language could be put together. Sure, one would get huge amounts of junk, but also the greatest wisdom and all the greatest speeches would be in there too. One just has to discern the greatest wisdom and greatest speeches from all the junk that could be expressed by that language. And what is 'language' anyway but energy combined in a certain form?
Perplexity isn't the first answer engine. It may be the first on mobile. Also, Microsoft Copilot is able to provide links, sources, and images.
Note to all: My comment posted for this thread has been hidden. To see it: 'Sort by' up above; Select 'Newest first'; Scroll down to this thread and select 'replies'. Enjoy. The Space Race is on.
Ignored the salyut7, mir2, why the iss was international. But nice nasa propaganda
Ignored apollo/soyuz as the first iss. Ignored salyut7 10yr run. The channel is a 🤡 show of bs americana
Thought provoking and obviously well researched. Some people delight in poking holes in your content. They should start their own channels. I appreciate your hard work and quality production.
Anything political will be criticised, I think this video was mostly unbiased, but I do think that the general western audience recognises too little of how much the Soviets helped with spaceflight, where it is unfortunately assumed the space race had a decisive victor. This is a good video but there's nothing wrong with criticism as it is not just purely stating facts.
Great comment. Keyboard warriors that love to criticize other’s work are so annoying, rude, and utterly lack social skills. Those who genuinely offer a different perspective and point of view are welcomed by everyone. Those who just love to hate on someone’s work for no reason are just projecting. Free speech is free speech, it’s just too bad when some abuse the privilege of being born with that right. Better people than they made it possible for them to take that right for granted. They seem to forget the responsibilities that are intended to go with their rights. I’m sorry to say I do it myself often enough.
@@janfilby7086I don’t disagree, especially when viewing documentaries of the Soviet Space Program after so much Soviet information was made publicly accessible. I find it remarkable when authors can remind me of the humanity of Soviet engineers, that Soviet citizens lived with a fear of the West (along with a fear of their State), that Soviets took great pride in their achievements. The Soviet Empire was much more than just an evil machine that cranked out weaponry, bent on our destruction, which is what I had been indoctrinated into believing since I was a teenager in the 80s. Although to be fair, just because it was propaganda and indoctrination didn’t mean a lot of it wasn’t true. As the poet Billy Joel wrote, “The Russians love their children, too.” Ok, sorry, this got a little more dramatic than it needed to be.
@@janfilby7086 Thanks to US Sanction of Russia in March 2022, future Space Program will be lead by Russia and China. Proof: the ISS is no more after 2027.
Welcome back and congratulations Sean!
0:26 nah its still an ai
@@TeMpZ_Veggies really? Damn
The ISS did help US/Russia relations for two decades! Really a shame how it ended up :(
That's what happens when you think you can be a friend of the US.
@@slimjim394sure buddy
@@slimjim394sure buddy
@@Hsa12354 You should get better informed. The Russian are not the one who started the conflict. Learn about Victoria Nuland and the 2014 coup.
@@ngamashaka4894 I looked into it and your right
Shouldn't have left China out, big mistake
Why? It's going great without them. The ISS has more crew capabilities than ever with three separate capsules and will go until the end of the decade.
The Chinese have their own space station themselves. The long march 5 B would take a payload penalty if it took the modules to the ISS, anyway.
I really don't see the problem.
@@dl2839🤡
@@dl2839 You forgot to mention the part about how they simply can't be trusted on any level. They love to spy and lie, and they have zero hesitation about swiping and/or copying others technologies and intellectual properties. This all plays a very large role in why they were not allowed to join and it is actually not a big secret either...that information is out there to be looked into for anyone who cares to. No idea how anyone could view leaving them out as a big mistake. They don't innovate. They don't regulate. They don't...or didn't even have their own technology and ability to produce simple ball point pens, like, they literally had to have the ball tips imported from Germany and others until very recently, and that too is 100% factual and can be looked into as well.
Copyland would have abandoned the ISS already and made their own
@@dl2839Maybe technically, but it wouldn’t have hurt diplomatically to have the Chinese as a Freedom member, even if “Chinese” and “Freedom” generally don’t go well together. For example , it was good PR and really helped diminish people’s fears of the USSR to have the Apollo-Soyuz program during The Cold War. Who knows - it seems there is WAY less national pride nowadays with our younger generations, so any kind of joint effort with the Chinese would probably go unnoticed anyway. As long as their Amazon packages from China get shipped on time, they’ll have no concept or care of geopolitical issues.
The iss was all about learning about long term space. What happens when you are in space long enough to visit another planet? Apollo gave us more questions than answers. It showed us what we didn't know. Questions we didn't even know to ask before we went to the moon
and yet, you still believe the Apollo existed... Hollywood studio
10:17 not true, they were just more efficient. The Soviets made most of the achievements up until the American moon landing. The Americans focused on redundancy, while the Soviets focused on reliability, so this could be a reason for looking less advanced. The Soviet space missions were often exceeding or on par with American space missions.
Yeah, and the need for reliability with no progress bit them in the ass in the long run.
Reliability? you are totally lost dude
@@viarnay have you seen Soviet space achievements compared to American?
@@emmanoble6735 They literally launched the first satellite. No progress my ass.
@@MasonAlex-f9p Obviously..Soviet had their peak landing a probe on Venus but they didn't go further..
Ok now I'll watch valerian movie intro again and I'll find a corner to cry for a while
There are 2 universes
•1 that travels
•1 that stops traveling
Thanks for this. I have seen the ISS go over a few times. thanks from NZ👍🚀🇳🇿
In the 1980s, the Soviet Union and the United States took the first steps in building their own space stations, but were ineffective in establishing a long-term station around the Earth. Meanwhile, the European Space Agency (ESA) also began participating in the space race and developing its own research satellites and rockets such as Ariane 1.
this is more accurate than the bs he calls an "explanation".
@@MasonAlex-f9p Thank you.
and yet, today, thanks to USA NASA & the European ESA, China is the leading into Space Station, land on Moon & Mars today. Fact check it.... Tiangong space station; four landing on Moon; Rover(s) on Mars.
Very interesting video. Thank you!
Great video with some cool facts in it. Thank you so much!
Question- we all know the ISS is getting old and will be replaced. Wouldn’t make since to use some of the modules of the ISS to build the new station?
Space stations have a limited lifespan. I do not know all the metrics of this. Space stations degrade. It seems like to a certain point it is more cost effective to launch a new module than to refurbish an old one.
I'd rather have all-new, but I like the idea of using the existing ISS as a place to live and work while the new station is being built as an annex to the original. Once completed, the 2 would separate and the new station would be the only one actively being used.
Similar to staying in a camper next to the new house you're building.
They are kinda doing this. There is a private space station company founded by former NASA guys that have the rights to attach their modules to the ISS. Using it's life support at first, but then eventually having their own life support and detaching from the ISS at the end of it's life cycle.
Not possible because all the moduleaterials have no guarantees anymore ! The ISS .has done it and there is no any prolong for this famous orbital laboratory ! 2030 is it's final end ! Period !
The new space station is inflatable in space and can bring 3 times the capacity to a new station.
Keep it up guys. I am a HUGE space and space history nerd. And yet I learn something new with each of your videos. Bravo brothers!
Most of this particular video is just American exceptionalism bs. Ignore most of the points on how "worse" the Russians were. Russia was on par to the US, and exceeded in most cases, especially on achievements.
I just downloaded perplexity and so far I really like it. It has potential!!
Excellent history and politics. Well done.
Very insightful
Great report!
It's so sad that the ISS is going... There was History there!!!
There was history in MIR. And there was history in Skylab. That had suitable sized modules. Compare and realize how ridiculous ISS is.
🚀🏴☠️🎸
My dad worked in military related aerospace up until the 90's. He was of the opinion that US was doing a handout to Russian engineers to prevent them from going to other hostile countries like China, Iran, etc.
The Americans were vastly behind the soviets during most of the space race. They only caught up after developing the Saturn 5, which was a miracle it got off the ground.
@@MasonAlex-f9p who's flag is on the moon?
@@lukehashbarger9936 Nobodys, because it's now white due to radiation.
@@MasonAlex-f9pThe Saturn V was one of the most successful rockets in all of space history. It never failed once, this was no accident, it’s good engineering and extensive testing.
Extensive testing is not completely correct, it's more like throwing random crap at a problem instead of finding a solution. NASA engineers have yet to resolve the issue of uneven pressure distribution, a frequent cause of engine explosions. Rather than investigating a solution, they attempted to counteract the problem by increasing the pressure of the fuel entering the nozzle cooler, leading to significant cost overruns amounting to 15 million dollars. This contrasts with Roscosmos, who had figured out that adding more, smaller combustion chambers solves the problem.
Also, I didn't call it an accident.
Can you make a video explaining why the docking port that Starliner docks at has that weird dogleg in it instead of being straight?
Love this video thank you
So why are the space modules pink? Is there a source of pink light somewhere ?
Magical place.. a rare honor and privilege to go there
Anazing video thank you
competition is fine too
It's is, but competition combined collaboration would be better, maybe, like the people at the gym that amp you up
When was SkyLab?
1973
to master a solar system as identiy has become a talent to explore
(rockets are eternal )
Great video! I knew some of this but the rest was absolutely fascinating! :-)
Moon without gates
Sean is it you or is Ted getting creepy good at imitating you? xD
Didn't MIR last over 30 years? The US only cooperated with Russia to learn how to do it. Knowledge and experience transfer.
Maybe Russia should have joined with the EU and other nations rather than trying to revive the failed dead Soviet Union~? Shalom
@@politicsuncensored5617 but they are not reviving the Soviet Union, but simply making money from the war
@@politicsuncensored5617 You basic fool. You believe your own government propaganda and then repeat it on RUclips. Basic.
Russia tried to join the EU and Nato. Instead Nato kept playing cold war games.
The impearlist West, projecting as always, supportiled by their poorly educated and easily misled populations.
@@politicsuncensored5617 Sure bro, you know how corrupted the West is. Our leaders are lying. Yet, you choose to believe them.
U missed out the uk flag as it was started with esa & the first stage of Arian 1 was the British black arrow cancelled rocket!!!
Hey...
Ich bin 18 und neu in der Geschichte oder habe neu die Liebe zur Geschichte gefunden. Ich habe meinen Großvater danach gefragt, aber er hat mir eine Erklärung gegeben, von der ich nicht glaube, dass ich sie wiederholen kann....
Warum machen es den Menschen im Laufe der Geschichte Juden schwer? Und haben sie es verdient?
Next step needs to be an O'Neil Cylinder that can be used as a long term living and construction facility with artificial gravity. A moon base should only be for mining. We need one big enough to be used as a space hanger. The biggest cost (and danger) of space travel is getting off a planet. Planets are so volatile and unstable, we should not even waste time and money on them. Mars is cool, but will never make a good living place and moons are better for mining. Even if we invent Star Trek Level propulsion systems, planets will still only be good for tourism.
Also, spinning space stations will eventually be needed for large populations to escape large scale planetary disasters, such as moon sized asteroids and nearby supernovas. Even our own sun is going to destroy earth eventually.
Cheer~~~a large artificial satellite used as a long-term base for manned operations in space.😊
These titles like The REAL Reason yadayada, and The Truth Behind yadayada seem so clickbaity.
Dont like? Dont watch. Don't whine. Easy. Simple
@@desertstar223 I'm trying to help. I like the channel. I want it to be better. Just present the content and be honest with the titles.
@@BrianKelsay Dude, do you want the video titles to be written the way YOU like them? Start your own channel, write your own video titles. Problem solved. You're not helping by whining.
Good one 😎
Long road... getting from there to here it's been a long time but my time is finally near I will see my dreams come alive at last and I will touch the sky no they're not going to hold me down no more no they're not going to change my mind cuz I've got faith of the heart
Unsubbed because I'm sick of the sensationalism. I'd still be here if you presented facts without that. GL
13:21 it was higher than the US, actually. The US focused on redunancy.
One of the greatest engineering feats in all history yet no one thought to take pictures of it being built. HUH. SUS.
It was a different time. Nowadays we can see 16 different angles of Starship lifting off.....the booster coming back and even Starship reentering the atmosphere.....live as it's happening.
There are probably a lot of still photos of astronauts working to put the ISS together......but keep in mind that those people were very busy and probably not a lot of time to take old fashioned video.
Actual professionals really don't care what silly little conspiracy theorists think in their mom's basement. It has no effect on the work they do
@@rickbase833 Like the moon pictures from the 60s and 70s?
@@jameshall1300 Loving personal attacks when NASA fans can't answer a simple question.
@@JohnDoe-ny1wp Yes.....the early landings were rough. Later missions had better quality.
You folks are really wedded to the notion that ISS will soon be retired. I really want to challenge that notion head on. The ISS is a sustainable, habitatble work space, with plenty of capacity for laboratory work, or any other purpose its managers can adapt that space for. It's about to have major upgrades in the form of Axiom Station. It will become exceedingly obviousw to Axiom that continuing to maintain physical contact with ISS is a much better idea than throwing it away. There's also the real, operational need to discover just how durable our human-rated technology is. The Voyagers have been out there for half a century. Hubble, 35. If you remembver MIR, that station was knocking at Heaven's door for a considerable period of time whilst still being visited by Soyuz and Shuttle crews. LEO Stations have the lunxury of a planet-wide parts bazaar capable of sending new parts up as needed. A trip to Mars is either bring a whole spare-parts warehouse with you (note to Elon), or you fabricate the needed hardware from what you brought with you. Regenerative cannibalism (c). Plus, give Alpha its due. She will be a grand old lady for many decades to come.
I wonder if Spacex Starship has been considered to launch models for a new space station. Allthough not perfected yet, they could launch huge modules for the next generation space station.
Yes, it has been considered by many individuals as well as private space companies.
Yeah the star lab space station is supposed to be launched on starship
Its been a long road? Gettin from there to here???
It's been a long time
But my time is finally near 🚀
Salute Seven
The wall came down in 1989. That is the year in which communism is considered to have collapsed. 1991 was when the struggling Soviet government finally imploded.
the grind this team is on to make videos for 2 channels is insane
Poor mother Russia, shes in hard times right now.
"There was more politics involved than you think..." OF COURSE there was tons of politics involved! 😉Lofty idealistic goals are great but a project like this, especially when they involve ongoing cooperation between *_rival states,_* just doesn't happen without tons of politics!
The iss should have been built to rotate... If the iss had the ability to rotate it would help generate artificial 1g earth gravity for the astronauts so instead of them floating their feet would be firmly on the floor and they can walk freely while on board the iss.
I don't the think it is the right shape.
That wouldn't work...rotating ISS would be difficult to keep in orbit because it's basically falling towards earth at a slow pace and you need to push it up every now and then...also the rotation has to be quite fast in order to be 1G...there are reasons it's not done, it's whole impractical for the shape of the ISS, most of the proposed rotation artificial gravity generators or large diameter wheels because that works the best.
That would be problematic.
In the astronauts are experiencing 1G, so would the various modules.
The connections between the modules would need to hold the full weight of the modules, rather than just being strong enough to keep the air pressure in the modules from forcing them apart.
The ISS is too small to rotate and get 1g while also being a comfortable experience for the astronauts. That would also have made it more expensive, which is problematic for obvious reasons mentioned in the video.
It's a research ship that specifically was for zero-G experiments. The whole point was not for a replication of gravity. A new one that rotates ought to really be being built/sent up now though.
A more understandable design flaw to point out would be there was no plan to push the ISS into a higher and more stable orbit to preserve it for future generations.
Bit of Bias there? Small & primitive? The Salyut space stations were pretty much state of the art for the 70s and they built & launched 7 of them Skylab on the other hand was a repurposed Saturn 5 3rd Stage fuel tank (Which is why it was so roomy inside the Saturn 5 was designed to go to the moon not LEO) and they only built one of them whereas the soviets improved they design with each iteration eventually building Mir and then the Russian segment of the ISS.
So with the current political situation, does Russia still have keys to the ISS or even the Zarya module? Or has the international space community changed the locks?
Mir means peace in russian.
So they have peace and we have freedom.... interesting.
That's a weird way to say 'Hermes'
You would think that the European Space Agency due to the historical issues that have happened in Europe they would not name a rocket Aryane
If they want to save the ISS and have it for another 20 years, they need to replaces the gaskets!😮
Thanks
Well I think I'm 3rd. Another very informative video. Keep up the good work guys!
Why do they even call it a SPACE station?! Ain't nobody on Earth has been past LOW EARTH ORBIT! 😂
Because it is in space? Also we sent people to the rock over there, that’s not in LEO.
There shouldn't be Czechoslovakia, The Baltics, Romania and Spain on there. (1:16)
Some glaring errors for sure. Europe develops its space industry because frankly we don't altogether trust America.
International space cooperation is a thing of beauty
Hopefully it doesn't end with ISS
i smell the makings of a movie here…!! not a documentary but a dramatization "based" on a true story. ;) interested?
What I thought US relying with what you called as old tech! when incompetance of west for built sustainable space station will not happened if no help from russia
The assembly of this program lacks a lot. The facts are ok, but the order of the dates of some of the details are incorrect.
I follow him
You forgot how Russia held the US hostage over this train wreck of a project...
I want an ISS module since the ISS will be decommissioned.
Why can ISS astronauts not look out into deep space, a zenith view? Is it true that there is nothing to see, that it is totally black out there?
This channel has become unpleasantly political. The word "superpower" is used way too often. Not sure if I want to follow it anymore.
Hi
Dude we know the usa and russia had to come together in space and built a space station because of extraterrestrial life somebody have to watch the earth 🌎 from above, greetings from the imperial city cusco the southern hemisphere amazon descendents
Yaay.
Reagan…I miss Ron.
8:52 I hate it, too...
I'm sure Hitler would love the name of Esas rocket
the Soyuz is primitive indeed, but also reliable because it can be operated without electric energy, if this would happen. i think this is the advantage why it stays on the iss til this day.
also be mentioned the Russians or former the udssr had set the reliability and functionality over features and complexity, so this outcome was predictable. i know some things was bad from the beginning but like the first home computers in russia. they worked but the quality of the materials were bad.
Yes it needs electricity. It’s got two solar panels just for that
@@Wurtoz9643yes it needs electricity but it can still operated with out it.
I saw Skylab reenter. What a loss.
What contradicted
That was president Obama, missing the opportunity to bring the cooperation up to a higher level. And it got even worse. Now it may rather take some time, before history reveals another chance for peace.
🚀🏴☠️🎸
Typical NASA short sighted what of a replacement or will they wait until it is no longer usable and then have no space station for many years also the current iss was only possible with shuttle
Hermes?
Are there any lies?
Not Space related, but April 26, 1986 had its moment...
Why did they left the Chinese out? Racism?
yes
Speak “European Space Agency”
💙👍💪👍💙
Todos a vivir en el cielo porque este mundo será destruido
America is soo powerfull and rich why do they need Russian help.
For the past 2-3 decades no one needs Russian help in space or anywhere else. That has been proven in Ukraine~! Shalom
Very US centric. Mir role is very much dismissed
Stop wasting $$$ on space exploration and help rescue endangered Earth!!
Lots of ignorance here
Russia is part of Europe, culturally and historically.
America dedicates much energy to splitting europe into factions. Not the least by physical invasion.
Russia was definitely Russia following the November revolution and has survived assaults from all sides ever since. America decries all socialist and secular states. This documentary is interesting to those of us who lived through the space race but risks being seen as crude propaganda as the presenter rants against the commies and even when giving grudging recognition manages to sound thoroughly condescending.
Makes me think that the Yanks are as brainwashed as the Ruskies are supposed to be.
its fake
How so Karen? Shalom
I'm puzzled that the USA couldn't build a space station on their own and needed collaboration with Russia and other countries. China built the Tiangong space station and it's a remarkable piece of engineering. Tiangong is far nicer and more elegant than the I.S.S. Cohesive. Well-designed. Thoughtful.
Imagine if China and USA collaborated on future space projects. It would be fantastic. Unfortunately, the Americans are too jealous and prideful and arrogant to cooperate with the Chinese.
Great achievements if the WORLD 🌎 COME TOGETHER FOR THE SAKE OF MANKIND AMEN
us propaganda
Iss is fake sure.. idk about chinese one
Hey can I get pinned
*pegged
Yo?