Inside Devonport's secret Cold War bunker untouched for over 45 years

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
  • In a forgotten corner of Devonport Naval Base, sits a relic of a bygone era - a Cold War bunker that has been relatively untouched and unexplored for over 45 years.
    With so little being known about the bunker, objects are being documented and preserved - with the opening revealing the very real threat of nuclear war a whole generation lived with.
    Forces News has gone inside the bunker that has been closed off completely for almost a decade to find out more about its history.
    More: www.forces.net...
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: forces.net
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    Twitter: / forcesnews

Комментарии • 39

  • @keiko909
    @keiko909 2 года назад +8

    he opened up the conversation with lord of the rings lmfao!

  • @TheSussexpillbox
    @TheSussexpillbox 2 года назад +4

    The MOD will obviously have files for this structure, either in TNA or their own database. Things do not just exist with no trace.

    • @burnheretic3950
      @burnheretic3950 Год назад

      There is a pretty solid amount of info that clarifies that MOD would not be viable today, and especially not as a deterrent. Due to submarines and other means, it would only take seconds rather than minutes for a warhead to be delivered. This would not allow a country to respond with their "iron dome" type systems. Only a "looking glass" type reaction would be most feasible. Unfortunate that it has come to this, and all the politicians seem to love it.

  • @sampointau
    @sampointau 2 года назад +1

    Hmm, from being in the State Emergency Services & Civil Defence from the late 70's, even though in Australia, it would appear to be a regional civil defence HQ.
    The paperwork, warning pamphlets, ops room chinagraph report sheets for casualties, building damage etc. are the same as what we had and out service/system was wholly based in the UK Civil Defence system except for some of our radiological detectors and dosimeter equipment which came from the US civil defence system.
    Even in Australia it was common for regional or district Civil Defence HQ's to be located in former WW2 defence establishments, I know of one that was in a fort dating from the 1800's that was in service until the 60's, another that is in the WW2 Coral Sea aircraft operations bunker and numerous others.

  • @sarahlouise7163
    @sarahlouise7163 15 часов назад

    pre-decimalisation was 60s, not "early 70s", decimalisation was in 1971

  • @leeclift4666
    @leeclift4666 2 года назад

    Ah janner land when l am down in Plymouth hearing the testing of the siren ever week still sends a chill through me

  • @VanderlyndenJengold
    @VanderlyndenJengold 2 года назад +1

    That bed at the end might need a matress topper.

  • @williamsion3000
    @williamsion3000 2 года назад

    SHOULD BE DOING THIS AGAIN!!

  • @Tocsin-Bang
    @Tocsin-Bang 2 года назад

    Interesting to see a couple of copies of CD Handbook No 10 was not for the public it was for Civil Defence Corps personnel to use in training the public.

  • @WizardOfCheese
    @WizardOfCheese 2 года назад

    interesting stuff!

  • @roland8449
    @roland8449 2 года назад +1

    Radiation symbol is upside down.

  • @Glocky131
    @Glocky131 2 года назад

    Frank Williams has such an awesome moustache

  • @cobbler40
    @cobbler40 2 года назад +1

    Bygone era ?

  • @21jlxi
    @21jlxi 2 года назад

    3:10 Obviously no work was ever done on a Friday!

  • @cobbler40
    @cobbler40 2 года назад +5

    Lucky there is no threat of nuclear war now ? Or is there a reason this bunker is being opened ?

    • @pepperroni6252
      @pepperroni6252 2 года назад +1

      I'll pretend it's for historical reasons and not to restore it for protection

    • @Dutch_fellow
      @Dutch_fellow 2 года назад

      There are new ones probably :)

    • @jari2018
      @jari2018 2 года назад

      @@pepperroni6252 same in sweden -they reopen bunkers to save them for history -i guess thats the reason ..really -They must inspect all availbe abandoned bunker in case , so its "historical in uk to not upset the public - they document tear out the old or keep the useful stuff keep it in case situation

    • @dingerbell100
      @dingerbell100 2 года назад

      @@Dutch_fellow There ABSOLUTELY fucken ain’t any mate…not to the extent there were in the 1960-1980 period.
      Absolutely zero investment in this.
      If the “balloon goes up”
      You & me are faaarked. The political elite @ Cabinet level & the very highest CoC of the Military will be secure & everything else … including the Faslane facility will be gone.
      Take that to the bank.

  • @noodlyappendage6729
    @noodlyappendage6729 2 года назад

    Looked like the bunker opened onto a railway.

  • @NoalFarstrider
    @NoalFarstrider 2 года назад

    This will be made into NEW bunkers.

  • @zen4men
    @zen4men 2 года назад

    Considering that Devonport Dockyard would be one of the first targets in a nuclear exchange, the bunker was constructed in a very unwise place.
    My ancestors owned huge quarries in Plymouth, supplied 4.5 million tons of stone for Plymouth Breakwater from 1812-1841, and supplied cut stone for many of the finer buildings in the The Three Boroughs. ...... The Glory of Plymouth was it's cut limestone and granite buildings and infrastructure, much demolished by the Luftwaffe, and then by the council. ...... Just as well that Moscow did not add to the huge destruction already suffered.

  • @tomsoki5738
    @tomsoki5738 2 года назад +1

    The government will do anything to cut our military capabilities... we never stopped needing infrastructure like this and we will always need it, stop shutting them down and keep them in service, it's far more expensive to have to completely over haul or build a new one than it is to just maintain ones we already have.

    • @Keyswiz71
      @Keyswiz71 2 года назад +2

      I was in the Royal Observer Corps and was stood down in 1991 with the final elements of the ROC being finally binned in 1995. All our monitoring posts, group headquarters, Nuclear Reporting Cells were scrapped to "save money" and it was never replaced so the current nuclear posturing from Russia is now shining cold hard light on that decision. As you rightly say it would be hugely expensive to stand us all back up, recruit and train personnel from scratch while replacing all the infrastructure that has been demolished. Ironically it cost less to run the ROC for a year than to operate just one Tornado jet for the same period!

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 2 года назад +1

      The problem is people now know where these are so you would have to find new sites if you want to build bunkers like this now. Yes this could be used for something but NOT what it was built for.

    • @tomsoki5738
      @tomsoki5738 2 года назад +1

      @@RJM1011 If they were never declassified and abandoned no one would know they are there

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 2 года назад

      @@tomsoki5738 But they have been that's the problem ! Also if taxes went UP to pay to keep them you and others would say it's a waste of money to do so !

    • @tomsoki5738
      @tomsoki5738 2 года назад +1

      @@RJM1011 No I wouldn't, defence should always be the no.1 priority of a nation, all else comes secondary, if the NHS budget has to be cut to keep us safe and the Russians and Chinese away, go for it.

  • @jackrklive4200
    @jackrklive4200 2 года назад +1

    good thing they didn't come across shelob or any orc's. XD

  • @mashbury
    @mashbury 2 года назад

    I grew up within the blast zone of Devonport in the late 60,s ,70,s and early 80,s and everyone knew that we would have been some of the first to experience “instant sunshine” in the UK You got used to it . My dad helped maintain the Plymouth City Council bunker in one of the Palmerston Forts. All pointless .

  • @MeM_UK
    @MeM_UK 2 года назад

    Document it then refurbish it. I want an evil lair.

  • @phucknuts.7065
    @phucknuts.7065 2 года назад +2

    The UK is to cheap to build nuclear bunkers for our people.

    • @aloh5613
      @aloh5613 2 года назад

      How would you house over 60 MILLION people for at least 5 years?

    • @phucknuts.7065
      @phucknuts.7065 2 года назад

      @@aloh5613 i would build bunkers and protect as many of my people as possible, but i would begin my term as PM by not antagonising other nations and get rid of the corruption of the establishment.

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 2 года назад

      Same as everybody else is ! LOL

    • @chiselcheswick5673
      @chiselcheswick5673 2 года назад +1

      Scares me there are people that believe we should be spending trillions of pounds on a futile attempt to survive a nuclear war...Its not like the country is bordering on bankruptcy as it is.

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 2 года назад +1

      @@chiselcheswick5673 I don't understand why you are so willing to just give up ??