I agree wholeheartedly with the pro-140 on the Duopoloy we have now. I've seen better candidates with more signatures snubbed by their own party because the Party Leaders didn't like them. However, JoeFletch commentator has a point. Anti-140 is pointing out particular passages which I'm not hearing Pro address just as specifically. What I DO know for absolute certain: Tired as all heck of the ads interrupting this so often.
STOP 🛑 ALL THE BS ADS constantly interrupting‼️ THIS DEBATE‼️ This & or ANY POD CAST, etc Shouldn’t have commercials or ADS‼️🤬 UR CONTINUAL INTERRUPTIONS ARE MEANT TO INTENTIONALLY CONFUSE VOTERS & that’s more BULLSHIT WE 🇺🇸 R SICK OF‼️
The arguing against 140 is citing actual parts of the law and facts. The guy arguing for it is pushing emotional argumens. Never trust the one who fearmongers. Trust the one who knows the law. Yes on 133. No on 140.
JEN ALLEN CAME TO MY FRONT DOOR AND TOLD ME TO VOTE NO ON EVERY PROPOSITION EXCEPT FOR 139. AFTER I READ THE OTHER PROPOSITIONS... I WAS SHOCKED, AND IT LEFT A BAD TASTE IN MY MOUTH.
@@coolvids841 WHY is there always that ONE PERSON WONDERING WHY IM WRITING IN CAPS and actually writing asking about it.🙄 I feel like you can figure it out. 😂 Just gather your own info.
Section 4: Article 7, section 7: This section does not prohibit the use of voter rankings to determine which person or persons received the highest number of legal votes. Not understanding how this is NOT rank choice. Would prefer the prop just listed the sections on independents receiving ballots, equality of signatures to be a candidate. If independents are paying taxes to get Republicans and Democrats their ballots printed and mailed, then the Indies should get the same courtesy of service.
Everyone says that what is in place now is not working. 140 says, "Let's try something different," and 133 says, "Hey, let's enshrine what we have now."
The fact that I have to come here to find out what I'm voting for is scary. Most people just vote blind
People will feel like it's a test and fill out any bubble pattern. Pick c 😂 I have a headache trying to educate myself on the ballot. Confusing!!
I didn't pay attention to politics before, after the last 5 or 6 years, things went crazy, I am paying attention now.
I agree wholeheartedly with the pro-140 on the Duopoloy we have now. I've seen better candidates with more signatures snubbed by their own party because the Party Leaders didn't like them.
However, JoeFletch commentator has a point. Anti-140 is pointing out particular passages which I'm not hearing Pro address just as specifically.
What I DO know for absolute certain: Tired as all heck of the ads interrupting this so often.
STOP 🛑 ALL THE BS ADS constantly interrupting‼️
THIS DEBATE‼️
This & or ANY POD CAST, etc
Shouldn’t have commercials or ADS‼️🤬
UR CONTINUAL INTERRUPTIONS ARE MEANT TO INTENTIONALLY CONFUSE VOTERS & that’s more BULLSHIT WE 🇺🇸 R SICK OF‼️
The arguing against 140 is citing actual parts of the law and facts. The guy arguing for it is pushing emotional argumens. Never trust the one who fearmongers. Trust the one who knows the law.
Yes on 133. No on 140.
JEN ALLEN CAME TO MY FRONT DOOR AND TOLD ME TO VOTE NO ON EVERY PROPOSITION EXCEPT FOR 139.
AFTER I READ THE OTHER PROPOSITIONS... I WAS SHOCKED, AND IT LEFT A BAD TASTE IN MY MOUTH.
WHY ARE YOU WRITING IN ALL CAPS
@@coolvids841 WHY is there always that ONE PERSON WONDERING WHY IM WRITING IN CAPS and actually writing asking about it.🙄
I feel like you can figure it out. 😂
Just gather your own info.
REDRAFT 140, TAKE the RED TAPE & sneaky language OUT & try again🤔
Section 4: Article 7, section 7: This section does not prohibit the use of voter rankings to determine which person or persons received the highest number of legal votes. Not understanding how this is NOT rank choice.
Would prefer the prop just listed the sections on independents receiving ballots, equality of signatures to be a candidate. If independents are paying taxes to get Republicans and Democrats their ballots printed and mailed, then the Indies should get the same courtesy of service.
It is my understanding that it essentially is RCV. 133 and 140 cancel each other out
Enter puppet candidates' to dilute the vote for targeted candidates! Where have we seen that
Everyone says that what is in place now is not working. 140 says, "Let's try something different," and 133 says, "Hey, let's enshrine what we have now."
The guy that’s for has a very slimy feel to him. Lowered himself to insults. Not a good look