What I saw in THIS
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 апр 2024
- This is an excellent example of "citizen journalism" and why it matters. Some people love it, some hate it (and probably still watch). This was a new take on why it helps, with an overview of the law involved.
DJ AUDITS VIDEO:
• No No No You Can't Fil...
For Drones see @Geeksvana
My Previous video:
• Ring Camera Court Case...
Free £50 when you switch energy suppliers:
share.octopus.energy/happy-hu...
Exclusive content: www.blackbeltbarrister.com
Become a Channel member: / @blackbeltbarrister
Support the channel: buy.stripe.com/14kdUS6gb4f26e...
or one-off: buy.stripe.com/bIYdUSfQLcLy7i...
TO CONTACT ME: Follow & Message on Instagram:
/ blackbeltbarrister
For FORMAL ADVICE Requests ONLY:
clerks@ShenSmith.com (non formal requests will be deleted)
💌 Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3tW8nPU (amazon link)
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9 (amazon link)
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi (amazon link)
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA (amazon link)
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT (amazon link)
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA (amazon link)
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT (amazon link)
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ (amazon link)
BE PART OF OUR LAW COMMUNITY HERE:
/ blackbeltbarrister
/ blackbeltbarrister
/ blackbeltbarrister
/ blackbeltbarrister
🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 (Amazon link)
🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV (Amazon link)
🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #lawvlogs
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated.
Why would anyone plaster their company name on a van or building, then complain when someone notices and records it ? Makes no sense.
People and companies only want positive exposure, if it's negative exposure ,they look for a large carpet to hide it under.
It isn’t hard to see the difference between putting your name on your van, and someone else ridiculing you on the internet in front of tens of thousands of strangers.
@@marinka424 Need a bucket for your tears.
@@marinka424 Yup -- the difference is between driving well and driving badly. but the least said, soonest mended.
@@marinka424 Good grief, when you're in a hole stop digging ffs.
I was watching Mahyar Tousi (RUclipsr) who was told by the police at a protest that he couldn't go closer as he needed to be in the journalist union to prove he was a journalist
If there is one thing the state cannot abide is, being held to account so ordinary people with cameras need to be stopped.
A recent trend the police at protests have adopted is them videoing the crowd.
They call it "evidence gathering" so that makes it all above board.
In the UK an employer or employment agency is not allowed to insist that you join or leave a trade union! As usual the police are just bluffing.
@@ricochet2977Bluffing or lying
Was Fleet Street forced Union Membership not broken years ago 😂
@@Mark-Singleton both.
I remember watching this crappy plastic company. They don't care about pollution they care about being caught out
The so called "green activists" NEVER go after companies that are causing the most pollution and profiting from it they only ever go after YOU and ME for driving, having freedom to travel/move freely etc. Ask yourself who they really work for and to what end.
I've not seen the video, so I'm going to have to look it up. But, it sounds like most companies, from what you say. Not all companies can be owned and run by Greta Thunberg 😂
@@patrickmooney5035 POW...puke nukem ...POW
Yes seen it ya right
@@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 ...are you okay?
The police in London tell people they cannot film as Journalists if they are not members of the NUJ. So the police are saying unless you are Union members you are not a Journalist. So according to this video they are again removing rights against the law.
Yeap, so either the Police are wrong or Blackbelt Barrister is.
@@marksapollo The police are very definitely WRONG.
@marksapollo I know who's word I'd take!
Does that mean if the person in front of you claiming they are police is not in a Union that they are not police then???
After all if they can make that claim it must be the same in all professions including Doctors, Nurses, Firemen and the police thus meaning anyone saying they are but are not in a Union is now impersonating a member of that profession and is now breaking the law....
I saw this happen to Tousi today, terrible. They did the same to Tommy Robinson, a huge crowd of policeman jumped on him and sprayed him, despite him being already in handcuffs. When the state wants to protect Islam, it will bend the law any way it wishes to achieve its agenda. The two tier policing system in the UK, is our biggest embarrassment.
Disgusting conduct leaving that plastic muck lying around everywhere and clogging up drains. I hope that company is shut down.
Hope you’ve reported it, or at least someone has, otherwise it was a waste of time doing the video. Perhaps join an environmental lobby while you at it,, if not already.
🤔hmmm... "...shut down"??? WOW! SEEMS A bit drastic! ... I think keeping the place clean, and not letting plastic outside is perfectly feasible, no?... Of course these situations are only noticed when someone makes a video, so kudos to DJAudits! 👍
The plastic recycling Co should be investigated and charged by the environment agency.
You won't see Greta the Gremlin and he worshipers protesting outside their gates.
Might be successful, unless the company donates to the Tories - then they seem to get away with any level of pollution.
worst plastic pollution is from hand car washes, 99% car cleaning products are plastic based which end up down the drain
@@Richard-Mac Examples?
@@Climpus It is just his prejudice showing.
This is not the first plastic pellet video DJ Audits has made. He's made a few of them where all the pellets make their way into the drains and all over the grass.
😦😦😦
But just like endless migration, women named Karen on Facebook sipping wine while their 8 cats wee on them can talk about what good people they are for recycling. Rotherham? Oh, that's just a conspiracy theory! The government grooming gang report? Show me it, or it doesn't exist! It was censored by the government even though 8 million people demanded it because it may incite? Sounds like transphobia to me!
Yep, I think he's found three like this already!
Xtex Polythene Ltd Huddersfield.
Just as bad if you guys wanna have a look.
I just typed that too. The worst I saw was called: Why Don't You Get A ** (can't type the rest) Langstone Plastics might also get you it in the search of his videos
Why do these companies get away with putting human poo, dangerous chemicals and plastics into our seas and rivers ???????????
Its typically out of sight...and out of sight is out of mind...
Because they are so big? RR aero have done it and I can say all the steam boilers they run around derby do not meet the regulations but they still get away with it.
Because we have a government interested solely in money making, nothing else matters to them.
It's so Greta has something to point at when blaming us for ruining her life😂😂
I'm not sure animals etc would eat plastic etc , fish take gravel and spit it out , anyone who had a goldfish and gravel at the bottom will see this , never seen a bird eat plastic either ,
Essex Police went through a period of misquoting data protection laws to discourage people from submitting dashcam footage. They foolishly claimed dashcam users would need to advertise their filming 😂
That sounds about right. No brains whatsoever.
Ahhhh, Essex Police - aren’t they *STILL* supposed to be looking for the killer of Stuart Lubbock?
What do they think the little camera lens is doing? It is advertising you be video'd. Guess you could put a 4 point font sticker on the back plate. U's are on camera.
Essex police are misguided at the best of times
@enkisdaughter4795 They found the killer, it was Jack Daniels.
I am a retired PC am surprised you have not done a video on the handcuffing of auditors during a stop search. One needs a reason to handcuff an individual which is a use of force. You have to justify the handcuffing of an individual ie aggression a history of violence etc It seems to be the automatic the go to action for many officers.A claim for compensation can certainly be put in for many of these police actions
I got £6500 for 7 minutes of being handcuffed.
Absolutely! Unlawful detainment seems to be hugely overlooked. Even where on is detained and not arrested, cuffs have to be warranted. Roughly with the kind of guidelines you mention, use of force, risk to others/self or of escape etc warranting a use force and means of detainment. Just because the cuffs come off, doesn't mean they were lawfully put on. I agree, this happens all too often and we don't hear much about it.
Tbh, it's more Americanisms creeping into UK police these days. Loosely it's Officer Safety is basically what they are saying,. The police know it's a camera, not a gun which let's face it, are very rare in the UK. It's power and control, or EGO, which takes over with police. After watching thousands of these types of videos, is blatantly obvious the police nowadays are policing others feelings or their own. Nothing to do with law. What has gone wrong?
Do you know in India it is totally illegal for the police to handcuff suspects? In the USA it is the first thing they do. In the UK I have thrice been involved with the police (as victim and a road traffic offense) but they absolutely never handcuffed me. USA cops are insane.
@@AI-Records24 Rightly so.I did hundreds of stop searches and used cuffs just a few times. Glad you took the action and got the compo you deserved
Pity we don't have actual journalists working at the BBC
Yes, they work for the tory government. The clue is in the name!
Because the Tories have squeezed them out all about profits for the billionaires and tax cuts for them
Coz the tories are trying to undermine trust in the BBC and sell it off to Rupert Mirdoch right wing media empire ala Fox and GB news.
So they appointed a political head instead of an idenpendednt as had been for decades.
Impartiality is strong in BBC. arguably too strong but its there for a reason and only last 10 years has it been a problem.
A flat earther v a scientist is Not a balanced debate despite what the tories think.
You right wingers probably just angry that the BBC isn't into racism. Cry more you fucking nazis.
@@ScottMurray-ce6iw bbc c4 etc all report to the Home Office. Which used to be called the War Cabinet pre ww2
I've worked for 25 years in plastic injection moulding, we have a procedure where the waste we make Is recycled correctly. IE the different plastics waste are re-grinded and blended back into the process. Never seen waste on the ground like this before.
This is why the cost of cleaning up the mess made in manufacturing et cetera MUST be accepted as part of the business or corporation's cost of production and must come from their profits. It is squarely their responsibility.
OH COME ON, just how naive are you? they will just pass the costs to the consumers, like always. It would take a RADICAL change of law to make the companies liable and to pay the costs AFTER profits, not before, thus hurting the shareholders payouts, otherwise they will just make it a deductible to running costs and consider it a tax loss at no actual cost to them, only the taxpayers. The only way to really tackle this is to make it hurt the shareholders and board directors bonuses financially, and no govt so far - or labour will enforce this.
@@rafezetter8003 Good points, but it has to happen in the end or we'll never get out of this profit trap. Unopposed, runaway cost free capitalism is a childish fantasy and corrupt from its inception. Even these terms are out-dated.
Capitalism cannot run unfettered at the expense of the people. Plus, both left and right are in bed with the WEF, the engineers of some of the most bizarre shenanigans and problems we have at present.
Our entire government/ruling 'class' are moral midgets with only a few exceptions and are clearly seen to to be only interested in their own advantage. They have failed by leaving the back door open for the WEF to try to sweep in.
Just like the water companies (Don't). They pay out a fortune in dividends to their shareholders instead of investing in their own infrastructure first, and then they expect us to pay for it when they raise their prices. Wrong at every level!
Companies are already liable for those things and if they are in the business of manufacturing have to work to standards set and audited by the International Standards Organisation, ISO .One of those standards is all the aspects of the environment . If they do not keep those standards they can be fined and lose business from other companies in the supply chain that do adhere to those standards . A company that I worked for as part of internal audits , that also had to be carried out , had to make appointments with recycling companies to be able to follow those company vehicles back to their depots to ensure items were being processed correctly . This company here might be quite small and as yet has not had any pressure put on it to meet environmental standards . In this case it is just a basic case of bad housekeeping and loss of control of materials , which are also audited by ISO . Your comment is not naive as the majority of reputable companies have been working that way for years already and absorbing the costs .
The water company's are doing just the same all about profit share holders
This is explosive news - who has allowed this to happen? The management of disposal of household waste is already a bizarre and dangerously regulated. Thank you for sharing.
Was it reported?
Mahyar Tousi was told by the Met police he wasn't a journalist because he wasn't in one of the unions.
Flak jacket on and everything lol
Tommy Robinson was told the same.
@homie3461 What criteria must be met to qualify as a 'journalist'? Being a member of a trade union?
@homie3461 Their activities clearly fall well within Daniel J ShenSmith’s definition of journalism therefore they most certainly are journalists.
@homie3461is this because they have a different view than you?
Focus Pocus is the main man.
Not a fan of auditors generally but Focus Pocus is hilarious 😀
Totally agree , a cut above them all
Yes ! He is amazing
Focus Pocus videos are works of art. Totally another class. His videos are rare which is good as they are crafted not churned out.
focus pocus is the best
Every beach across the globe is contaminated by these plastic pellets. My dad used to collect them thinking that they were amber.
They are predominantly localised. I live in the Falklands, and these pellets are very very rare, in fact the only rubbish, wood, plastics etc is from the immediate area.
That's not an excuse for companies not to exercise more control over their own waste.
I've not seen the videos from the auditor yet, so i am assuming that the amount of pellets that were found is not what would would be reasonably be expected from slight spillage.
Your dad seems like a very silly man
@@MalpriorvidsHi to the people of the Falklands from your brothers in the UK.
@@bobbyboyderecords completely unnecessary comment, give your head a wobble.
DJ had another shocker of a video about 6 weeks ago where a boss of a company attempted to swipe the drone controller out of his hand unexpectedly, there was also 3 or 4 employees surrounding him with hostile intentions, think it was a company near or in Manchester, that was bad.
But yeah that plastic recycling place need to clean their area up and stop being concerned about cameras! Or maybe that was why!
That was Libre Chemicals and yes Manchester. A shocking video, but then on another day, a whole bunch of different auditors turned up. Even Charlie Veitch made a trip there, but then he is also in Manchester.
@@Justyburger Really ? haha After that drama ? Which other auditors turned up?
Suppose you're like DJ and you go around deliberately annoying people and wandering where you know you shouldn't be. In that case, you're not going to be taken seriously when you actually do film something like this plastics firm that is worth reporting. It's literally the boy who cried wolf situation. If he wants respect and co-operation then he should act professionally and not get into silly arguments.
Most of his videos I've seen show him being an annoying argumentative, know all little twat.
This is so bad. Companies need to clean up their crap. I do not for one want to live in a third world shit hole. Even although it is rapidly becoming one.
Crazy corrupt times as always.
The reason I watch audits.
Every Police Officer swears an oath to solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm ......
In most audits officers uphold feelings , not the law.
Exactly, many hate the police and I was not one of them. BUT.. watching the way some of them act angers me sometimes. Imagine standing outside a shop, just standing there doing nothing you would not expect the police to come and harass you.
Stand there with a camera and the story changes, your a villain and they just need to find what crime your committing.
What about the auditors that go to private enterprises or stop people in the street?
Should those be stopped?
@@Kalamain They don't stop people in the street people approach them and say don't film them. Like running upto a killer saying don't kill me... why not run the other way?
Private Enterprise, you mean a business so not private?
@@WhiteDieselShed Not all businesses are open to the public. Quite a few REALLY are not.
And you are arguing from extremes.
And, yes... They do.
@@Kalamain People in the street have rights to. You have to remember though in public there is no expectation of privacy. If an auditor goes to far the member of the public can report that auditor for harassment or breaching of the peace ect ect.
Businesses need to take half a day and train all there employees , especially Security about General Data Protection Regulation. More importantly though is how to deal with members of the public. A great many public employees are attrocious in their jobs.
We’re a country of freedom -
Scotland left the chat.
"They may take our lives. But they'll NEVER TAKE OUR..... never mind."
In Europe we are spoiled , if you really didn't have freedom you could even post , sorry but is a first world problem what you are saying
We're a country without hate speech - JKR has left the chat.
Did we? No Kjng James 🏴 no 🇬🇧 no empire, no Industrial Revolution.
Let Bannockburn be a reminder to Humza and all our doubters if they think a piece of paper will hold us down.
😉 ask Edward II 🏳️🌈 how he got found out.
@homie3461apart from his mother being Welsh, and his name literally being a Bretonic word for Welshman.
Awkward eh? Or did you forget that Strathclyde spoke Welsh? What’s this you say mate, Scottish not British is it?
😉 make facts your friends.
It's like living in North Korea. Authorities, citizens and jobsworth don't like cameras and drones, and that's because they capture reality, bad behaviour and law-breaking. We might have a freedom-based society with a legal framework, but against current standards of policing and recruiting we don't stand a chance. The law is quite clear on public photography as Daniel says. Unfortunately, police, security staff and interfering busybodies with no jurisdiction whatsoever, don't know the law or they flout the law and make things up.
Except its not as easy as you think.
If you think those jobsworths don't like cameras, just think of how it affects us photographers when people like auditors go around quoting laws that have nothing to do with photography, forcefully remove others rights by filming through windows, trespassing on peoples property, causing a nuisance, flying drones low and looking through windows with them?
Just to give you an idea, that is more like North Korea as your rights are being abused but you don't even see it. Please read below, its the part of article 10 that no one reads but is the most important when expressing a freedom (note the duties and responsibilities part, that means the person expressing that freedom is responsible for what they do, so why do auditors always refuse to take responsibility for their actions?)
The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
I've never seen any auditors doing these things. "Get back to work"
In other words sit in your little hut, and shut the fuck up! Lol
It's like North Korea? What a stupid thing to say.
A Avon and Somerset copper came into my home a few years back, entered the property on a lie, and then told me I should 'move to north korea' if I wanted to smoke weed..
We are run by full blown nazis. That's the truth of it.
@welshgit 500k excess deaths due to targetted austerity.. dude, think about it. Just because you have Nike trainers and Yankee candles do t mean you are free.
DJaudits should come and video our River Loddon here near Reading. It is chocablock full of plastic waste. Its disgusting. Our country is a disgrace. Nobody gives a toss.
He couldn’t give a shit about that. His purpose is to provoke staff and make exciting content! Don’t fool yourself. Have a normal life.
The Police prevented then told Mayer Tousi and others filming they had to stop filming a recent protest. Unless they could prove they were members of a journalist union group.
I thought anybody could film in public, journalist or not
The company needs to be reported to the environmental protection agency England and shown the evidence documented by DJAudits.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Has it actually been reported though?
Odd...police told mahyar tousi...of tousi TV. IF he wasnt a member of the NUJ. he wasnt being regonised as a journolist...
So basically we can't film undet GDPR. Yet irs ok For us to have facial recognition, sell off our health data other data etc.. etc.. These people are breaking the law.
Well said
You agreed to that by breathing it seems. I don't remember them asking me if they can share my data with private companies though.
The sold health data is anonymised, GDPR only applies if you can be identified by it.
@@WhiteDieselShed PUKE NUKEM
You can opt out but they don't tell you they're doing is so it's your fault you didn't opt out, that's how the world works these days.
The local council where I live, had the bright idea of filling the new concrete sea wall with plastic strips (I'm not joking). Since the sea wall has taken a bit of a beating, the sea wall has broken up in places, and those strips are often found floating in the sea.
I remember seeing a piece on TV about it. At the time it was heralded as an ingenious way of reusing waste that would otherwise go into landfill.
As the old saying goes, "today's problems are quite often yesterdays solutions."
@@JaenEngineering Its possibly the maddest thing Ive ever seen. Plus it was only built in the last ten years, so not as if we dont know better.
But I am sure their stupid rationale.would be they werw recycling those strips of.plastic 😂😂😂
It was a cheap way of building a Seawall , compared to actually building a proper sea wall.
They didn't build it very well if it's fallen apart after 10 years.
P.I.N.A.C Photography is NOT a crime .
It is legal ,leave photographers alone .
The Airspace is controlled by the CAA NOT a landowner
Don't interrogate them and certainly don't attack them physically (they have cameras remember you WILL get caught )
You are not a photographer then?
PINAC is a lie, just to prove my point, up skirting, the use of a camera to film up a woman's skirt, covered under article 10 of the 1998 HRA until 2019 when it was introduced as a law because people who had cameras and abused that responsibility (sounds familiar), made it into the voyeurism act, now a criminal offence which is just one of many laws that prohibit photography is one way or another.
Airspace, you have a right to privacy and you can trespass with the drone if its too low, this can lead to the operator/pilot being stopped or even arrested.
And please, don't talk about photography when you get your information from people calling themselves photographers but don't talk about photography, or even follow the laws regarding photography where applicable.
That's not completely true. AFAIK, airspace is divided into the higher and lower stratum. Depending on the location, the lower stratum is usually 500-1000ft above ground level and can legally be controlled by the land owner beneath it; it's the upper stratum that is under CAA control. Drone operators are limited by law to a maximum altitude of 400 feet, so a land / property / building owner can legally insist that you do not shoot aerial footage of their land / property / building.
@@tonyb1223 -You haven't proved anything. You've changed it by mentioning 'upskirting'. Obviously in any universe would this behaviour be beyond reasonable photography. Even a twit would realise that this particular 'use' of the camera is unlawful and wouldn't need some fancy legislation to confirm it. Didn't realise you had to be 'qualified' to be a 'photographer'. I take it you don't like drones then?
@@wowbaggertheinfinitelyprol6262 - 'insist'? Hope their tape measure is long enough..
@@ef7480 They don't need a tape measure. If you're limited to 400 feet, then you're in the lower stratum.
As someone who aspires to be a journalist one day I refuse to accept that DJA is a journalist the lack of ethics and integrity is a problem for me
Journalists are trained and should adhere to certain standards.
@@vetinaris1297 Exactly
On balance, "auditing" is good. Some Auditors set out to provoke a bad reaction. DJ is polite and inquisitive but will put people straight if he is bossed around. DJ is clever and articulate and knows how to balance his approach as he wants to be seen as an Educator and a Documenter.
Disagree....i find Nigel very condescending towards people and has an attitude issue ,
@@leeallen1407 that's not quite right I'm afraid. DJ gets caught at the flooded ford talking to another RUclipsr. They go into quite some depth as to why he does what he does. He didn't know he was being recorded. He states point blank that 'nark, is what they want' and that's what he does his best to give them. He sees his viewers as a way to earn income, and this comes across in the conversation he's having at the flooded ford. He's interested because he'll earn from it. Not once in his conversation did he mention anything to do with being on a cause for justice. In another video, he reported some citizens for boxing him in when he was parked. He made all kinds of allegations. Lo and behold, the only bit of footage not on his site was the bit where they committed a crime. Turn out the citizens were annoying, but what they were doing was perfectly legal. You'll also notice him crying to the police if he 'feels upset' but uses seven levels of sarcasm against the police when he feels he's being dealt with unfairly. Give and take. Rough with the smooth. And remember, I'm responding to his actual words and not what I think that he might think that maybe he thinks - as most people here do.
Also, his stream is full of positive comments as he blocks everyone else. My friend and I have tested this by making negative comments. There was nothing rude - and nothing as rude as he uses in his videos. He's a man with a lot of words and very little to day. Every link in his biography earns him royalties - he forgets to say that.
Why don't the police call handlers just tell the people that want the police because there is an individual armed with a dangerous camera that it is completely legal, instead of wasting police officers time,that when/if they turn up, just try and make up the law because they are clueless
@legion162, as a retired police officer, who worked in an Area Control Room, I used common sense. Caller...my next doors neighbour alarm is going off. Me... do me a favour please, nip round and see if anything is amiss, if it looks iffy, don't go near it let me know and I'll send a car. Caller...looks OK to me. Result no body sent. Civilian call handler....right I'll send some one straight away. Result waste of police time. Common sense isn't it?
19:12
Exactly and why will the police not say what the person who called claimed took place? Was the call really a man with a camera is on the public footpath outside our boundary and they send 1 - 3 cars on blues and 2's ?? Emergency is where?? I would have expected a PCSO on a pushbike, who would roll up and say nothing illegal and everyone have a nice day.
Most of the police don’t appear to know the law… civilian staff don’t stand a chance
Plus the callers typically lie to make it sound worse - they should be done for wasting police time 🙄
@@paullaw5054 I don't know whether the police have changed in response to society, but I remember say 20/30 years ago police seemed to have common sense and use their discretion.
Say about 30 years ago small town where I live used to have trouble quite regularly, often a smaller offer would turn up on his own, let the trouble fizzle out a bit, tell everyone they'd had there fun and make themselves scarce before the others turned up with truncheons and making arrests, most of the time they dispersed pretty handy.
Well done on that video DJ Audits, a welcomed independent vloging journalist report. It did the work that local authorities / environmental agencies should be doing, though we know the financial strain due to central government funding, and selfish Council Tax dodgers who really have little regard for the communities they live in.
What is the outcome? Who was it reported too? Has he been back to check it’s been cleared? Were they fined?
The police did this to Mayor Tusi when filming in Londanistan on the weekend. An inspector wanted to see his NUJ membership. An inspector who is full STARSI mode.
it's like East Berlin during the soviet Era. but you can't escape to the west and freedom!!
Dj audits is a great channel. Been watching him for a long time now.
If we didn’t have auditors these companies and police would be off their toes and twice as bad
I prize humility, and find this kind of self-righteousness baleful, essentially because my hope has gone. My faith in justice is no more.
Let's not forget when someone audited Nigel Dick's (DJ Audits) business premises, noted the external grounds were messy, litter strewn everywhere and his employee said he was not allowed on private premises and called him a c***.
What ? He has a business premises ?
Most auditors prime reason is to exercise our right to film and to refuse our ID on demand without a crime committed.
They hold officials and businesses to account protecting everyone’s rights
No you don't. You just make a nuisance of yourself, looking to antagonize people purely for clicks.
@@KH-wy7le… yep I’m sure your one to say … let the boats cross .. what’s the problem.. YOUR THE PROBLEM
@@KH-wy7le I AGREE DJ DID DO THAT IN THE PAST HE WOULD GO IN AND TELL,THEM WHAT HE WAS GOING TO DO . THAT WAS DELIBERATELY CAUSEING TROUBLE. BUT IF FOOLS LIKE YOU GO OUT TO PEOPLE FILMING THEN ITS YOU THAT ARE THE PROBLEM. PJ STILL DOES THAT AND I HAVE TOLD HIM HE IS DOING IT DELIBERATELY TO CAUSE TROUBLE. BUT IT YOU COME OUT THEN ITS YOU THAT IS CAUSING TROUBLE.
@@KH-wy7le well if you watch the good ones they do not actually do anything other than stand on a public pavement with a camera and are usually approached aggressively by self entitled people making demands based on their feelings
Photography is not a crime but accosting people in public is. Just ignore auditors or offer them coffee and the business gets great free publicity
I AGREE SO LONG AS THAY DONT GO IN TO TELL THEM WHAT THAY ARE GOING TO DO . THAT IS THEM DELIBERATELY STIRRING PEOPLE UP . BUT IF THAY COME OUT AND HAVE A GO THEN ITS THEM THAT ARE CAUSING SHIT TO HAPPEN. NOT THE MAN WITH A CAMERA OR A DRONE . DJ USED TO DO THAT AND I HAD MENEY GOES AT HIM FOR DOING THST SHIT . BUT HE DONT DO THAT ENEY MORE . PJ STILL DOES THAT THE PRICK AND I TOLD HIM SO THE OTHER DAY . JUST DO YOUR THING AND . IF THAY COME TO YOU THEN ITS THEM THAT ARE CAUSING SHIT. DO YOU AGREE .
"we're allowed to shock and disturb other people"
try that in Scootland
That's what I was thinking, he's very wrong with that statement.
The Data Protection Act covers Scotland as well, and it mainly comes from GDPR, which covers all of Europe. It protects the right of non-employees not the companies! Also, how can you measure the shock or concern of an individual? I was shocked and disturbed by the smell of your aftershave, colour of your socks or the look of your face! Scotland needs to grow a pair.
@@marksapolloHe's a Barrister in England, he's very RIGHT with that statement (legally)
@@595goldy Nope he isn't, the new Scottish law extends beyond Scotland and into the rest of the UK. So you better be careful with what you say.
Hummsy Useless shocked the Scottish Nation and in fact anyone with common sense tbh
I appreciate my neighbors' cameras pointing my way. Extra level of security in case of trouble and mine don't do the job. If they want to watch me coming and going, hot rodding on the riding mower cutting the grass, and throwing a Frisbee with my dogs enjoy the videos.
Me too
I never considered my cameras overlapping my neighbor's yard to be a threat to anyone. After someone tried to break into his house the police came to get footage I wasn't aware I had and I did release it with his permission. The idiot stopped to answer a phone call and looked directly at the camera that was covering part of my driveway when walking to commit his crime.
The issue for me is audio, not video. I don't mind an overlapping image of my property but i do mind everything I say being recorded. If I was living in Scotland then it would be even more of a concern and I would politely ask my neighbour not to record audio. I would do the same if asked, it's just being a good neighbour.
Why would it be more of a concern in Scotland? @@RandomShart
@@Idomealways..
New hate speech laws, where you can literally be arrested for telling a joke that might offend someone.
These plastic pellets are everywhere! They get shipped in 1 ton rubble bags, and they are constantly damaged by logistics companies and literally swept in the gutter! I told my manager this and was told off!
There was a case here in the US where the police seized a drone and the footage that was flying over someone's own property. The policeman said he believed the homeowner was intentionally shooting footage of a crime scene nearby which he wasn't. The homeowner wasn't charged because they hadn't broken any law. If the drone had gone outside the citizen's property it would have been a crime.
DJAudits is an absolute TO$$ER!
I think if you run a recycling company and you let loads of plastic pallets end up in the normal sewer YOU are the one that is provoking a reaction in the form of people standing up and trying to call you out so you make changes. People seem to think you can only provoke people with words but actions can be just as provoking.
whats even more terrible is the fact that the local council isnt monitoring and managing the plastic rubbish seeping out from the premises into the road, drains and public areas without issuing some sort of corrective fine, penalty or court case.
The problem with flying drones in a Nuisance fashion is it draws more and more complaints to the Aviation Authority that eventually they Increase the areas you cannot fly any drone. Until such time it's not even worth owning one.
Freedom of the press is only a right if everyone can participate. It's disheartening to see that many police will trample on someone's rights. Also, the public has a right to know when companies are polluting whether it's legal or not.
Its all about "views" (they make money every time someone watches their uploads).
In the case of DJ Audits his videos are of industrial estates (could you pick a more boring place) and seemingly the way they stack pallets or have no solar panels is meant to be interesting. Use of the drone is just to annoy factory owners/management.
This isn't about photography rights this is about making a few quid for these guys and provoking people in to getting a reaction for cheap entertainment.
100% agree, and dj is one of the worse ,his channel got big and his ego got even bigger ,
During a summer student job we were taken huge storage facility near chemical/ plastics plant for a clean up of these pellets that were stored there , the foreman asked us to sweep them all down the drain. We refused also pointed out they would cause issues with their pipe work which worker confirmed months later
Regarding filming buildings, I used to do street photography around the centre of Birmingham. An issue that came up from time to time was building owners citing copyright as meaning photography was not permitted in the area. Specifically, if a building or part thereof appeared in a photograph then that would violate the copyright of the architect of the building.
It was naughtly of them to tell you that. Buildings are protected by copyright under English law but there is a specific exception under section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which permits you to take a photograph or film of a building without infringing its copyright.
@@cstrip976 I normally went with right of panorama (article 93) as I wasn’t taking a photograph of the building, it just happened to be in the background of the image behind who or what I was photographing. Part of the issue was that this was the early 2000s and if the police were called the conversation stopped being about copyright and turned into one about preparation and planning for a terrorist attack, when really it was probably mostly about them wanting to exert control.
The difference is the people in big brother signed up for it
I'm favoured, Getting my own Truck has always been my Dream for my business. I just acquired 2 recently, earning $32K weekly has been really helpful. I can now give back to the locals in my community and also support Charity Organizations.
Hello, how do you make such monthly?? I'm a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down of myself because of low finance but I still believe in God.
Thanks to Andrea Sheryl Fox .
She's a licensed broker here in the states.
Wow.. I know her too she is a licensed broker and a FINRA agent she is popular in US and Canada she is really amazing woman with good skills and experience
I googled about her and yes, she's won my heart. She just gained herself a new client
What worries me, is people are now doing this in areas where the storage, transport and transfer of high consequence dangerous goods are being carried out. Most of these places are just on industrial sites and makes targeting for terrorism much easier, especially if you divulge what is there etc.
There should be a law which allows a person to choose whether they go on the internet or not. It’s not about whether they’re filmed, or upset by an auditors comment, it’s about how and where it is distributed afterwards. Yes, abuse, shock, be rude to them, ridicule them reduce them to tears, make them frightened, but don’t then put it on your you tube channel so that all your flying monkeys can add more abusive comments towards the person. Surely this is unacceptable human behaviour? Isn’t that inciting hatred? Reality TV contestants chose to perform in front of tens of thousands of people, they don’t have it forced upon them, when they’re a quiet person who just wants a quiet peaceful life. A security guard has an obligation to speak to a stranger on the premises. It doesn’t say on their job description that they should expect to appear on a you tube channel of an auditor which can be viewed by the world, just for carrying out their job description. Perhaps that’s something that will happen in the future. I suppose when it becomes hard to get security job vacancies filled, ( because becoming an infamous you tube star is on the job description) and people don’t join the police because they don’t want to be ridiculed on the internet, maybe something will happen. Life is such, that a fair percentage of employees encountered by an auditor will have at least one serious problem in their life, they may have cancer or dealing with bereavement, or a child might be ill, or their dog might living out its last days. . This is another reason why you don’t then plaster them all over the internet for ridicule, it just isn’t fair play or decent. As an auditor you can’t assume that the person you’re victimising doesn’t have a serious problem in life. If it was only rude behaviour which was ridiculed and abused in the comments then you might have an argument, but it isn’t. Some people now, behave wonderfully, but they still get abuse in the comments section. ( i.e. the two Karen’s in the DJE recent video) Meantime we have to rely on a persons moral focus, human empathy, and hope they care about their fellow human being sufficiently, to know what is morally right and wrong, especially when you have the ability to”expose” the average person to the world on your you tube channel. It is a great power, and with it, comes great moral responsibility.
The amount of times the police come out to deal with DJ and other audit channels is ridiculous. The police should be charged for wasting their own time.
And yet it's almost impossible to hold the police to account when they screw up ... until it's just, it's just noise.
Easy overtime!
Nobody can own, the view. Nobody can own, other people's view, other people's sight. That's just plain ridiculous.
You can own a point of view 😁
@@tttt4029 you can’t stop others having the same point of view tho
@@WotsisFace I think we've lost view of the point of this conversation 😁
@@tttt4029 You may need an optician because the point of view is clear to see. :)
@@WhiteDieselShed Wish i'd never started this 😂
When we used to go into London to take photos just as amateur photographers we would make sure we were always on roads and paths that we could drop the little Google yellow man onto. This means it's a public road and so when, as sometimes happened, a security guard would challenge us, we would show them Google maps and ask them to call the police if they had any further issues.
that was very interesting. i follow a you tuber by the name Mahyer Tousi of Tousi tv he was at the marches of hamas supporters in central London on friday. he was reporting from there and he and another reporter were told they could not report or film because they were not members of a union !!! wow just wow
@homie3461you missed everything said in this video. No one needs to be a member of a union to be a professional in any field. Union is a choice.
Thing is did they forget about the cctv .. facial recognition that operates in London!! Trust me .. the hierarchies know each and everyone who attended ! But they want to stop you from putting it on social media !? .. hope Tusi makes a complaint!
The Filming of car registration plates is another example that seems to provoke anger,The fact is you wouldnt get far if you were to stop at every shop or business along the way and ask them not to film your car.
What's your car reg? purely out of harmless interest ofc.
@@vetinaris1297 DJA UD1TS 😁
@chrisbulmer7 so you don't.wamt your reg plate published but it's OK for others to be? Thought so but worth checking if you a hypocrite or not, you might have been genuine
@@vetinaris1297 First of all i do, nt drive and secondly you can not get a persons details from a reg plate unless you work for DVLA or a Police officer.. Your car registration is owned by the DVLA Not the owner of the vehicle
@chrisbulmer7 there are other ways, legal ways to get the address from the DVLA. There are also many not so legal as well.
But basically you're scared is what youre saying. That's fine.
You can fly the lightweight 250g DJI Mini drones over built-up up areas and uninvolved people. Drones can be prohibited via signs from taking off from premises, like, offices, castles, national trust buildings etc but they can't be stopped from flying over them.
At least some conscious inhabitants of England and Wales are concerned of holding companies accountable for their lack of care for the environment. The current Windermere sewage news is shocking!
There’s an outcry in Scotland at present because a cinema as cctv camera in the ladies toilets .
The camera is pointing at the babies changing area so how does this work.
Surely this should not be aloud. ?
As an assistance to you, the filming of a computer screen within the building (e.g. A Jobcentre Plus employee using the screen upon which they are viewing a clients details) can potentially break GDPR rules if the view is sufficiently well focussed for the camera operator to identify personal data of the client. Same for the 'signing in sheets often left open in a foyer of said jobcentres where clients visiting may record personal information
The onus is on the job centre to ensure that the personal data is properly secured and not on public display.
@@twig3288 precisely so, and that was the point. Thanks for the comment.
In instances such as this, audit channels have a place but the vast majority just bait security guards of companies for a reaction which is pathetic.
I agree with your comment, some of the auditers are good people but the majority like you say just go out to bait people or provoke to get a reaction for likes which in itself isn't a crime but it sure is pathetic , it could lead to ruined lives
Sovereign citizens are the same. The worse are the ones who trample all over crime scenes making up conspiracies for views.
yes and a particular one who trys t omake peopel believe he is DJ AUDITS is the scumbag dje media.. he isa complete idiot who does his best to provoke and i am suprised he has not been seriously hurt by now.. he has no real idea of the law , does not study any of the laws to do with his filming and just watches others and trys to be like them but ina stupid smarmy way.. he now even has a electric bike like the real dj audits and a zoom camera.... he is not liked by anyone and is a real pain in the arse and causes trouble where there isnt any...
If you are baited into a reaction then you are equally pathetic
I think I only disagree when the audits interfere with a company/person in the company in order to try and get them fired or publicly shamed. There's one by a Scottish auditor where he asks a security guard in Morrisons where the blind spots are, whilst looking at the security screens. A confused exchange with the security guard ensues, who understandably assumes the guy is up to no good. The auditor then leaves the store and comes back in holding a cane and pretends that he was asking about changes to the store that affect blind people. He demands the manages come over to teach the security guard a lesson and potentially sack him. I can't see why current laws should protect those actions.
I rang them and they said they had cleaned up the plastics and so I asked if I could go there and do a follow up v log for our Channel Surviving Retirement Banking.
A bit late here. I worked in the Hilton Hotel in Park Lane in the early 1960's on lift maintenance. The top restaurant overlooked Buckingham Palace gardens. A week later heavy curtains were covering the windows that overlooked said gardens. I doubt if you could fly a drone over Buck. House.
Health & Safety will have a field day when they see this. They have the power to shut them down.
You need to watch some of DJE Media's content too. And his second channel Audit The Dealer. He actually shared one of your videos, one that was aimed at why what they are doing is not OK....his interpretation of your video is a little skewed at best. He's read that journalism doesn't require the person to abide by the guidelines (I belive the physiological term is Dunning Kruger effect, where by something is read in this case and that person feels they are the authority in said subject) I digress .....guidelines set by the ICO and thst GDPR doesn't apply to him or anyone who identifies as a citizen journalist or private journalist.
Have a watch of some of his stuff, shocking????
Hi Dan, I was just as horrified to see his RUclips video outside an Iranian TV station in London. After he exposed it's location to the world. A dissident Iranian journalist was stabbed outside his work.
Those plastic pellets do not require a clean up, the company should change its practices to prevent them being spilt in the first place. They have a duty to contain their product. Remove the risk of spillage and you will eliminate the hazard.
While I agree that plastic pellets 'escaping' are bad I feel that people should watch the video and see the on site yard. It is brilliant. The materials outside can be remedied by modificaions to housekeeping.
They should but they don't
Are cars like Tesla and others with onboard cameras always operating possibly breaking the law by recording neighbors?
Typical 🇬🇧 Britain. Very untidy and dirty.
Freedom of speech is a beautiful act. DJ Audits has coin the phrase "get back to work" after interactions which is genius in its own right.
but some of these people are pushing for an argument, harassing, whether it is legal or not they are looking for a fight for more views
and
Don't ever take a picture or film anything in public ever again. You might be pushing for an argument or harassing.
One day one of these so called "auditors" will end up in hospital when they approach the wrong member of the public who will take offence by their provocation. Same with Cycling Mikey, it will happen, they will get hurt. But, I'm sure when it does they will be rubbing their hands in glee and counting the £££ signs.
Didn't pj audits get beat up
Great.. so could someone forward this to the Police... since they generally seem to think they can invent the law as the go along, negotiate the publics' rights, and intimidate citizen journalists (when you watch these RUclips films)
I’ve seen a few of his videos highlighting pellet spillages, I’m also appalled by this, imagine this all over the country, it’s ridiculous
@BlackBeltBarrister I watch some of the Audit channels and my only concern (as a drone pilot) is the following :- the increase of people doing audits on youtube (for the views, and the negative reactions) and the more time the public overreact and call the the police then eventually drone laws will be introduced to stop them. This will in turn impact every recreational drone users. (my views only)
Nah, it’ll probably just add new no flight zones over specific places like police stations - it’s unlikely they’ll stop flights over all private businesses or land
Yeap, because their may be no law against it, BUT, the employer cannot expect employees to turn up for work and be recorded working by a total stranger who then uploads it up on You Tube without permission it their knowledge. That is where they could lobby for the law to be changed.
I tend to agree, I am sure the vast majority of drone uses do it legally and for either personal videos or other reasonable reasons, however as with most things there is a rogue element that will go out to deliberately annoy people or violate there privacy. We had several instances in the village I lived in last year where a drone was being flown between houses (mostly bungalows) at a height that easily looked into windows and several pictures were taken of it hovering outside rear windows, it also did low passes over peoples heads, eventually it hit a rotary washing line (which shows what height it was at) and crashed. Pictures of it were posted in a mangled state, apparently the households dog used it as a toy, no one ever came forward to try and claim it back. To the best of my knowledge this sort of use is already illegal in the UK, (feel free to correct me or give details of existing laws) but I believe you are right that complaints will lead to tighter laws even through the laws are only like to be followed by and impact the responsible users and ignored by those who are currently breaking the laws anyway. The UK has a history of passing reactive "knee jerk" laws to implement controls after "incidents" that were already covered by existing laws so as to be seen to do something for political ends, they are rarely well thought out.
Some industries it could reasonable argued that the workers should have a reasonable right to privacy, police is an obvious one for all sorts of reasons, but also meat processing or other sometimes controversial industries where workers could face abuse or be at risk of targeted attack from extremists for working legally, even places of worship could be considered to have a reasonable expect for privacy, during funerals comes to mind.
Daniel, I watched a video of yours only a few weeks ago where I feel certain you said All Auditors go out and provoke people for a response. I felt at the time you were not correct and I had DJ in mind when I thought that.
He’s the same as the rest …. Just fishing for controversy to get views, he’s just a bit more articulate than most of the duffers 😂
I feel he was describing the attention seeking idiot that is Charlie Veitch.
The answer is to be more relaxed if he turns up no views
What would happen if you played loud commercial music near him. Would it interfere with his video ?
ofc he provokes but he's provoking people who mis-understand the law and he likes to show them that they have no power and educate them.
Filming for a commercial property. When i passed my RPQ in 2013, it was illegal to perform any filming with a UAV and cameral for commercial purposes, unless certified with a BNUCS or RPQ
They said that they would ring me back but they didn`t.
Great auditor, amasing how many times he gets recognised in public for a green pair of tracksuit bottoms . He got assaulted while recordingbat salford quays . If you would review that audit i would love to hear your thoughts ❤
Would love to hear you talk on Tommy robsinson being barred from entering the m25 … have you got the bottle ?
The m25?
@@gingernutpreacher the motorway that runs around greater London
@@gingernutpreacherThey mean within the M25 Motorway. It rings outer London.
@@stuartb4525 my bad bro 😂
@@user-ol7pf8ke7r We said the same thing 😂😂😂.
Hi I would be interested in your opinion of farmers riding quad bikes around on public road that are not road registered. I was always led to believe that all vehicles travelling on public roads had to be registered, insured and displaying number plates?
Hello I have a question regarding these drone audit videos. Taking in to consideration the requirements to make commercial flights for example CAA Operational Authorisation PDRA, permits and business insurance are these flights legal if an auditor dose not have these but they are receiving an income via RUclips monetisation?
At what point do these auditors become required to obtain the mentioned documents?
the company have obviously been hosing their yard out of the gate and into the drain there.
probably for years
Djaudits points these issues out quite a few times. Brilliant what he does agree with it it not it needs highlighting. 😊 How else are councils and owners to note the mess say behind a desk 😊
Landowners can object to the flying of a drone over their land as these small drones can only be flown within the the lower stratum (below 500 ft). This is the airspace immediately above/around the land. Interference with this air space would affect the landowner's reasonable enjoyment of the land and the structures upon it. You can prevent people from interfering with or intruding on this airspace.
Same up here in Ardeer Scotland where plastics factory is allowing plastic pellets into surrounding areas, storm drains and beach etc.
we once caught a drone hovering outside & looking through my Childs bedroom window... I was furious and to this day do not know where it came from. I am sure this is illegal...
It is.
I had a drone snoop on me so I always close my curtains now
Window cleaners? … get curtains!
@@andyxox4168 Get a sling shot or a 22 airrifle as you'll soon find out who's drone it is.
Endangering an aircraft is an offence
DJ and D A V I D are mainly OK. I think it’s good if companies take action based on information they are given about how to improve their operations .
My local tip is dodgy AF too. They have a huge processing building on site, lots of noise and banging going on in there with huge punctured holes in the sheet siding from all the hits it's taken from whatever they do in there. I've seen many times the same truck leaving and then returning shortly later and reverse into the processing building to drop off a full load. I can't be certain because you can't really see in there when the truck is backed up, but I'm sure it's the same load they left with! Sometimes they are just blatant and empty two different bins into this building where it's piled up like a mountain, all mixed. Maybe that's how it all gets processed? I don't know, but why mix the bin contents after everyone has been made to put their rubbish in the correct bins? Am I on to something?
we need much more audit channels just to highlight the "if you don't know the law they will abuse what little you don't know"
this is why so many boat people wear high vis shirts and accuse you of CRIMES where none exist because they KNOW nothing about the legal system here but knowing nothing makes you prime to apoint because someone who dosn't care / know about the law won't be held back by it when issuing fines.
Thanks D J’
I Think your videos are both informative & entertaining
You try your best to inform both bosses & employees of the law in the UK
BUT they just don’t want to know instead they go crying to the police
in the hope of getting you arrested I think what you do is fantastic
Keep up the great work.
I have a question... Oddly specific one.
What about going out with the intention of provoking a negative response in order to record it IN ORDER TO MAKE MONEY FROM IT.
Now, the point I'm making is that a lot, not all, of these auditors will go out KNOWING that what they are doing is going to cause concern.
Many times auditors will record people coming and going from a site. One guy was deliberately standing at an entrance to a site and was putting the camera right up against car windows to see in. This can be considered alarming. So when they are approached they DELBERATELY act in a dismissive or whatever manner KNOWING that what they are doing will cause a negative response.
Their sole point is to act in a way that will cause the negativity, the response they want.
In this case mentioned it just happened that there WAS a genuine journalistic worthy issue... But more often than not these channels don't actually want that. They want the negativity.
So... My question is this... Do I have the right to stop someone making money from their recording my reasonable confrontation with the auditor?
The auditor who is acting in a manner that could well cause alarm.
Yes, many auditors do seek confrontations, but each case has to be judged on its own merits. The one breaking the law would be whichever one used threatening and abusive language etc, whether the auditor or the person being filmed. Some auditors are just annoying but not breaking any laws. How you respond is your own responsibility.
@@jonfrance7201 That's the thing though. So many of them skirt just on the edge... They are annoying and POTENTIALLY dangerous...
Especially when they are live streaming and start looking in peoples cars.
You could think that they are casing for someone else to steal later.
Like marking jackets of people at cash machines.
One person marks it and another robs them later.
The point is, none of that stuff can be proven, you are talking about people's intentions and thoughts and people 'knowing that what they are doing is going to cause concern'.. the fact is what they are doing is legal, standing in a building entrance site is legal, pointing a camera through a car window is legal - these are the facts. If people take offence to that that's their problem.
@@cstrip976 Of course you can know what their intentions are.
Just watch their streams and videos.
Listen to what they talk about.
They know, we know and you know what is going on.
Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.
They are taking things RIGHT TO THE EDGE to get a response.
They KNOW they will get a response.
THEY WANT THAT RESPONSE.
They monetise because of that response.
PEOPLE GO TO THEIR CHANNEL TO SEE THAT RESPONSE KNOWING IT WILL HAPPEN.
@Kalamain I agree, but so what? For the same reason the police are toothless in this matter and any barrister will tell you, filming is a perfectly LEGAL activity. It's no different to people being offended and wound up by someone eating an ice cream outside their premises. That too is a legal activity
Google also blurs numberplates and faces of people in the street
Face covered individuals...some shameful and cruel work in the name of citizen journalism.....they like easy targets in which to inflict their brand of pain and suffering with people being harassed and intimidated in their workplace.. then the auditor's create their own privacy with a face covering... ..thanks for your expertise...
Brilliant BBB. And your mate 'Art of Law' is bloody brilliant too.