I have compared image resize and enhance. I took a picture and enhanced it twice by saving the dng as a tiff and then enhance this tiff a second time. Then I enlarged the original photo 400% and dragged it into the same document for comparison. At first sight at 100% zoom the results seemed almost identical, but once I started zooming in I saw more sharpness, better edges in the enhanced version. But then I saw where this feature really differs ... In the photo there was a woolen glove and the knitting patterns in the image resize version did not continue correctly, while they did in the enhance version. Actually, those patterns were blurred in the original version, but very clear on the enhanced version. So basically it created something that wasn't originally there.
Try Topaz Gigapixel, Or use a free AI online upscaler, You should get far better results, even at 400% For faces there's only one option Rimini app which is Incredible, hands-down the best face restoration What I do is use Gigapixel or an online ai upscaler, Then use Rimini app to Restore the faces. That's pretty much the best possible with current technology
AH HA! As I watched this amazing tutorial I was going to ask; Can you enhance a image twice? You expertly answered that question with the work around using Photoshop afterwards. Thanks for yet another incredible tutorial . Photoshop wouldn't be as much fun without your tutorials👍🏾
Matthew, Camera Raw should recognize the sidecar file and all your adjustments should be visible in Camera Raw and of course, they will apply to the new Enhance file.
Barry G, I haven't tried it. But in theory, this should give you better results because of the machine learning technology that is better and will get better as time goes on.
Use Bride to open the Jpg, or from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the File Type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
1:40 Doesn't seem to work on JPG or PNG for me. "Open as... Camera Raw" in PS then 'Enhance details' give error message "Enhance details cannot be applied to JPG photos." Option not available in Bridge. CC Desktop says Camera Raw 13.2 is installed.
So Enhance details cannot be applied to JPGs. But you should be able to apply Super Resolution to a JPG image. It tried it and it works fine for me. Does Super Resolution work on Raw images for you?
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel after downloading your image, I can get "Enhance Details" but not 'Super Resolution' option. 2:14 my dialog box looks different. 'Enhance Details' only. Can't find how to get to 'Super Resolution' for JPGs. I'm up to date using a PC.
As always appreciate your tips and instructions. You are a true master of your craft. Unfortunately this feature crashes my Photoshop software and I cannot utilize enhance. According to the Adobe Forum this has been a known problem since 11/6/20. "Engineers are looking into it" No suggested resolutions have worked for me with the most up to date Photoshop software. I cannot use Enhanced.
I would say it is software. Enhance is the only thing that crashes Photoshop in my computer and it does it immediately. Mentioned in Adobe Forum 11/6/20 "Photoshop 22/Camera raw 13.0.2: Enhance Details crashes on Windows" no resolution that I have found as of yet 3/14/21. Sent 4 crash reports. Everything is up to date on my Adobe software. Just cannot use Enhance at this time and I am rely heavily on ACR to process. Again thanks for taking your valuable time to respond.
Thank you for video but when I tried to follow along, my camera raw 13.2 in PS doesn't have the film strip icon on the bottom and when I right click there is no enhance button, plus no three dots to click! Even when I upgraded the dialogue box mentioned the super resolution, too! I'm desperately trying to figure it out! Any advice?
Are you using the Plugin, not the filter? to be sure, open from Bridge. If you don't have Bridge installed then from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
Hi Jesus Ramirez, a few queries. (1) in view that it increasses file size about 4 times, what is the actual commercial use? (2) This is even more troublesome when commercial hi-end workflow involves focus stacking od 3-4 shots, each with 3 shot HDR. each RAW itself is in adobe-Rgb profle 48 mb. Am i in wrong track in understanding about your this teaching? Please help. Thanks.
1. This feature is most useful when you want to print large scale and the original is not giving you the results you want. 2. Yeah, also, the problem might become the final resolution output. This was definitely not designed for scenarios like that or large panos. I think you ar in the right track :)
Hi, thanx for your videos mate, and especially how you take your time to explain everything in-depth ;) Can I ask if there is a filter or a tool that makes pages/pictures look high def like for example in a Vogue magazine? Thanx.
Actually its not amazing, considering that GigaPixel was around for a while and still does a better job in most situations and in many ways is more versatile and flexible tool. I don't remember getting as much attention as this even if it keeps getting updates and improving.
I haven't compared it to GigaPixel, but I'll take your word that it does a better job. But that doesn't mean this tool is not "amazing." It still accomplishes something impressive without having to go and purchase another tool, or learn something new. Of course, Adobe updates get more attention. They're a larger company that offers the industry-standard tools.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel True. But maybe in this case Amazing is a bit over the top. The technology has been around for a while and considering as you said for a company the size of Adobe, I see they invest a lot of time in rainbow logos and changing menus to appease the SJW's but not nearly as much in features and bug fixes. Most of the features they do add these days they buy from other companies and really actually innovate anymore. At least AI should be easy with the company of their budget and resources. Sense AI engine is good but its still not amazing. Most of the stuff they use it it for, like auto selections, applying auto corrections, resizing with "super resolutions" are things other companies have been doing for a while. If you want to see something truly amazing with AI, check out Nuke 13 and what they have done. You retouch one frame in video, and you let the AI learn what you did and apply it to the rest of the frames in the clip, effectively acting as a flexible assistant. Now, that is amazing. Enlarging a photo with no options to tweak the settings is far less amazing. Just saying. Lot of hype, but limited Wow factor, considering what is on the market today. Anyway, my critique is more at the Adobe in this case not your channel. So don't take it personally. I love your tutorials. Keep up the good work. Cheers!
@@colvingenealogy Although I don't know what your input or output looks like, except what you wrote, short of being a bug it should not be the case. You can post in Topaz forums your results and maybe I'll see you there. But I've seen people who try software, don't get what they expect and conclude , wrongly the software is the problem. I've upscale thousands of images with GigaPixel and compared it to every other one on the market that is available offline. And at the moment it is overall the best still. I suggest you try testing more or post on forums at Topaz labs under gigapixel forum so we can talk there about the specifics.
Sir I have a problem scratch disk pop up is coming I cleaned all temp files then I changed in scratch drive c drive and E drive after that my Photoshop loading so slow when iam using gradient tool it taking time Loding progress so plz can u tell sir
I sure look forward to them implementing this in Lightroom. Lately I've been shooting a lot of pictures of small birds and it's hard to get close enough to fill the frame with a 300mm lens which is the longest lens I have. Of course I could open bridge and do it, then import the dng file into LIghtroom and finish it there, but that's several extra steps to go through. The reason I don't like doing them in Photoshop is that when you export them from Photoshop it strips out all the exif data and I've not been able to find a way to force Photoshop to include the exif data when exporting images.
Hi,I have camera raw 13.2 and used one of your tutorial images but when I right click on the image in camera raw , the option I have is "enhance details " and I do not have the super resolution option . Any suggestions appreciated Peter Haines
Peter, if you do not have Super Resolution and just Enhance Details it means that Camera Raw was not updated. Did you check from your creative cloud app to make sure Camera Raw was updated?
I have Photoshop 2021 with Raw (not PS CC). When I go to help / Plug ins / Camera Raw it shows i've got 2020 version 13.1.0.658. When I try do do an update it tells me I have the latest Camera Raw. Do I need to use Photoshop CC rather than Photoshop 2021 to use the technology available on version 13.2? I haven't moved toward CC as i keep my photos and back ups on local hard drives.
Ron, Photoshop 2021 is Photoshop "CC." Adobe dropped the "CC" a few versions ago. Unless you want to, Photoshop 2021 does not save to the cloud. So you can keep your files as they are in your local hard drive. If you have Photoshop 2021 with the latest version of Camera Raw then you should be able to use it. Make sure you are using the Camera Raw plug in from Bridge, or from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Ok. great. That definitely helps me with the understanding the difference with CC vs. 2021. Thanks Jesus ! .... I tried the super Res. on a PSD file of my image but PSD doesn't work with camera raw plug in. So I converted it to JPEG then Tiff. Both gave me a message saying my images were not compatible with this feature and i needed to work with a 'Bayer type sensor raw image'... I went back to my original file which is a DNG and that DID work.. Unfortunately, I've made many changes from the original image which is now nothing like the original and they are now in the PSD format...... jpeg and tiff will open with camera raw but won't do the super res conversion. I probably just can't be helped with this particular image??
Great Video. Not just trying to tear it down like other Tubers did. I got some real amazing results with portraits and city scapes from 18 and 20 MP canon sensor raws... . I found jpgs didn't work that well for me. Also some natural patterns seem to be difficult for the AI still. Some results actually had digital artefacts, so you have to check your result ... and adjust noise and sharpening as you mentioned 👍
Hey everyone, could someone tell me how to make the brush tilt/rotate so its not painting the frontview but instead its flat on the x axis, like when I want to pain on the floor or ground, hope you understand what I mean, and TIA....
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Wow thanks you for taking the time to reply, I feel a bit dumb now, I always see that setting, but never mess with the roundness, just the rotation, thanks you very much...
which is the best way to mask hair whenever i try to use any method select and mask color range on busy backgrounds it never works even channel masking it always end up looking something out of minecraft how do i avoid that ????
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel i was just watching streams on adobe cc channel featuring you, and you replied. thank you and take care master, i hope i'll meet you one day teacher!
My GPU is old and lazy, like me--took 5 minutes, and I have never heard so much spinning and crazy whirring sounds come out of my computer! It kept going higher and higher until processing finished, and then silence again.
9 year old Dell XP8500 w/NVIDIA GeForce GT 640. With a few changes over the years. Windows 10 and a solid state drive, a bit more RAM...it's a DINOSAUR!
I would imagine that if you’re using a small jpeg file, that it might help to use the Neural filter that compensates for compression first, before enhancing.
hi, your videos are excellent and amazing. there are so cool and informative. only because of your tutorials I became perfect in photoshop. so please can you also make tutorials on adobe illustrator
Jesus, I was having a problem with right clicking on a picture in Bridge and there was no "Open in Camera Raw" in the pop up list. Also the icon for "Open in Camera Raw" you showed us was grayed out. So in Bridge I went to Edit > Camera Raw Preferences > and in the resulting dialogue box select File Handling. In the section JPEG and TIFF Handling, I changed the JPEG: and TIFF: boxes to "Automatically open all supported ____" in each and fixed my problem. Hope this helps anyone else having my problem. As always the tutorial was great, thank you.
Interesting but I'm not convinced that the quality will be good enough. The lens chromatic distortion was way off and the enlargement really exaggerated this. It would be interesting to see the results using ACR chromatic correction, ' before ' up sampling and using it ' after ' the enlargement.
Generally speaking, it does add artifacts. After all, you're doubling the linear resolution. It's not by any means perfect. But in a lot of cases, the overall image enlargement works better than anything else in Photoshop.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I am comparing with Topaz Gigapixel AI, though I have not compared the two in a precise way. My initial reaction is, that Photoshop is less pleasant to look at with a 2:1 enlargement, but I could be wrong.
I wonder how it compares to On 1’s Resize app. Adobe’s UI sure looks better, at least. By the way the subscribe animation and bell sound are really annoying IMO. On other channels I always give a thumb down whenever the host doesn’t mute the bell sound. Just a feedback.
Well, they're both used for upscaling. But the way of doing it is different. Since this uses machine learning technology it should give you better results.
when i open the images on photoshop, the quality always shows up as 240 ppi how could I get it up to 300 ppi ? i’m a beginner and would appreciate your help :) thanks
I'm not getting it. Nothing changed except the size. It changed from 72ppi to 300ppi. Big deal. The actual photo had no noticeable difference. I did see something that I need addressed. When I click off the Super Resolution nothing happens and the Raw Details won't allow me to click it. It says "Applicable only to Bayer and XTrans raw files." What does that mean?
Bayer and XTrans raw files are the most common types of raw files. Bayer is used by Sony, Nikon Canon, while XTrans are used by Fuji. Nothing happening is sort of the point. So this is meant to make your image larger without losing detail or getting blurred edges. In other words, is supposed to look the same when you make an image larger. In some cases, the detail enhancements may give off the appearance of more detail.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thanks so much. I thought something was wrong because your Photoshop shows differently. When I hold the cursor over my image to see the before and after, I see no change. I just see the image is larger, but no sharper.
It's not a perfect solution, and it gives you better results in raw images. Also, generally speaking, this will give you better results than other enlargement tools in Photoshop.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I am on the latest of both, yes. It comes up and says it does not support JPEG files with an "Unsupported file format" error. I've tried it on several different JPEGS just in case there may have been an error with one. I've tried it with .jpeg extension and .jpg extension.
@@Alphadragon1979 That's so weird it works fine on my end on a jpg. Does it work on a raw image on your machine? If you don't have one you can download the one from the link in the description of this video.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I will give that a try a little later today and let you know if it did. I find it strange too, everyone says it's suppose to work, so I'm a little baffled.
I get a warning flag that says "Enhance requires graphic card with Metal Support" It has a "Learn more button but only goes on to explain details of the enhance feature but not the "Metal Support" requirement.
I have tried using this on various jpg and raw files up to about 10MB. The results were not satisfactory and strange artefacts were left randomly across the image. So it must be graphics card dependent. I'm using Intel on board graphics which is admittedly cheap and cheerful and I was expecting a time penalty but this was a disappointment.
Hi, Lisa! Did you try Sue's suggestion? It should work. Also, from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the File Type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thanks for checking in. When I try Open As, I go to Open and then select the file and choose the format, right? I don't have a Camera Raw option in the format dropdown. I have a Photoshop Raw option. When I proceed with the Photoshop Raw option it creates a weird grayscale photo with a double image. Clearly I'm doing something wrong. Is there someplace I can send you screenshots? Thanks a million!
@@lisaroth719 Do you have camera raw installed? From your creative cloud app make sure it is installed. But from the Open As dialog, under file format there should be a camera raw option
I know you did this video 4 months ago but I hope you see this comment. I was running a photo thru Topaz Sharpen AI and notice that it displays an image that I enhanced in Adobe at it's original size. That is, it displays the original dng and the 4x enhanced version at the same size, 100%. If I look at the images in Lightroom or Photoshop they show the enhanced version at the correct, enlarged, size. Have you experienced this? What's going on?
Both this guy and piximperfect always leave things out of their tutorials. So, where are we supposed to find this camera raw plug in? I have PScc, is it available? I have regular camera raw, what's the plug in?
As I mentioned in the video, if you use Bridge, you don't have to worry about the filter since it will take you straight to the Plugin. If you want to open a raw image then from Photoshop just open it as you would any other image. What I didn't mention in the video is that if you want to open a JPG, PNG, or Tiff from Photoshop you can go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
Amazing New Feature with disappointing results. Lots of chromatic abberation. I got similar results with image size + a few sharpen filters. Machine needs to learn a lot.
Nobody seems to care to mention that you need to have a special Graphics card to be able to use the feature, as if we don't have to buy enough material as it is. Long live the age of obsolescence!
@@DavidRFIT I have a AMD Radeon R9 M390 2 GB, it's 4 years old and it doesn't seem to be up to the task. I get a message that says I need a graphics card that has metal support.
George, every version of Photoshop has always had minimum requirements. I know it is frustrating when things don't work for you. I've had the same issues before and I know how annoying it can be. Adobe and all other companies design their new software to work with the new hardware available to take make better tools. Remember, Photoshop is a professional tool and it is designed as such. But they do try to make it work on machines with slower hardware as much as possible. The age of the hardware is less important than the capacity it has. You could buy a new computer today without a GPU and it wouldn't work as well (or at all) either. To know the requirements that you need for the latest version of photoshop you can check this link: helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/system-requirements.html
Well this is the "Photoshop Training Channel" And this video was an overview showcasing a new feature. Is this tool perfect? Of course, not. But the point of this video was to show how a new tool works.
![How To CUSTOMIZE The Photoshop Interface Color [2 Quick Hacks]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dqaenVwvUqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![How To CUSTOMIZE The Photoshop Interface Color [2 Quick Hacks]](/img/tr.png)
⭐ *Follow on Instagram!* ►instagram.com/photoshoptrainingchannel/
*Resize Photos Without Losing Quality in Photoshop* ► ruclips.net/video/XUkH6UoyfZQ/видео.html
*Tutorial Images* ► photoshoptrainingchannel.com/super-resolution-adobe-camera-raw
Absolutely love your vids! Short, to the point, full of info, and you don't blather on about useless crap like so many others. Good job!
Thank you, George!
great, simple, to the point, practical help and overview
Thank you, Darcy!
I shoot medium format so as not to have to double image size or Rez but now? Maybe I can swap out this bulky gear for a 4mpix point and shoot?
In theory, yes, but when possible I would recommend shooting at the higher resolution.
Very nice as always.
Thank you, Bob!
This is such an exciting feature! Thanks for sharing Jesús :)
Thank you, Tyler!
I have compared image resize and enhance.
I took a picture and enhanced it twice by saving the dng as a tiff and then enhance this tiff a second time.
Then I enlarged the original photo 400% and dragged it into the same document for comparison.
At first sight at 100% zoom the results seemed almost identical, but once I started zooming in I saw more sharpness, better edges in the enhanced version.
But then I saw where this feature really differs ...
In the photo there was a woolen glove and the knitting patterns in the image resize version did not continue correctly, while they did in the enhance version. Actually, those patterns were blurred in the original version, but very clear on the enhanced version. So basically it created something that wasn't originally there.
Awesome, Frank! I'm glad you found it useful!
Try Topaz Gigapixel, Or use a free AI online upscaler, You should get far better results, even at 400%
For faces there's only one option Rimini app which is Incredible, hands-down the best face restoration
What I do is use Gigapixel or an online ai upscaler, Then use Rimini app to Restore the faces. That's pretty much the best possible with current technology
I love all of your video and keep up the amazing and useful work👏🏼💚👍
Thank you, itsmesallam!
I was waiting for this exact video for you to share with us 😍.........Thank you so much .
You're welcome, Snakes peer!
After you complete the enhance photo can you send it into lightroom cc to develope? Thank you!!!
You can definitely do that if you like. Just import the DNG.
Best photoshop channel not gonna lie
How do you open camera raw PLUGIN from photoshop if you don't have bridge installed?
I'm trying to do that as well
From photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file in your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel thanks a lot!
Yes, Adobe Crime Suite is finally available!
😂
I agree. Other than being designed with the Digital Image Thief in mind, I'm not sure this is a a very good thing for Public Consumption.
AH HA! As I watched this amazing tutorial I was going to ask; Can you enhance a image twice? You expertly answered that question with the work around using Photoshop afterwards. Thanks for yet another incredible tutorial . Photoshop wouldn't be as much fun without your tutorials👍🏾
You're welcome LH thanks for watching!
Hi Jesùs.
Will this effect an image that already exists in your Lightroom catalog or is this new image independent of Lightroom files? Cheers
Matthew, Camera Raw should recognize the sidecar file and all your adjustments should be visible in Camera Raw and of course, they will apply to the new Enhance file.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thank you mate. I appreciate the reply and information 👍
amazing feature thank you so much PTC for sharing, love you.
Would have liked to have seen it used on JPEGs and how it compares to using the Image Resize > Preserve Details 2 mode in PS ?
Right, I’m also curious as to how this differs from the Preserve Details 2 resize algorithm.
Barry G, I haven't tried it. But in theory, this should give you better results because of the machine learning technology that is better and will get better as time goes on.
Awesome! Thanks!
You're welcome, Delta Drones-World From Above!
Amazing
Thank you, Deepak Maurya Arts!
How do I apply this on JPG? Enhance doesn't show up when I open a JPG image in Camera RAW 13.2.
Use Bride to open the Jpg, or from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the File Type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thank you so much!
Brilliant as always
Thank you, Textile design urdu hindi tutorial!
1:40 Doesn't seem to work on JPG or PNG for me. "Open as... Camera Raw" in PS then 'Enhance details' give error message "Enhance details cannot be applied to JPG photos." Option not available in Bridge. CC Desktop says Camera Raw 13.2 is installed.
So Enhance details cannot be applied to JPGs. But you should be able to apply Super Resolution to a JPG image. It tried it and it works fine for me. Does Super Resolution work on Raw images for you?
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel after downloading your image, I can get "Enhance Details" but not 'Super Resolution' option. 2:14 my dialog box looks different. 'Enhance Details' only. Can't find how to get to 'Super Resolution' for JPGs. I'm up to date using a PC.
Awsome new feature, thanks for the review! I have noticed that Topaz gigapixel ai adds more detail to the photo during the upscaling proces.
👍
Nice bro
Thank you, MS!
This is so cool! Can't wait for this to be available in Lightroom as well. Great video as always :)
Thank you, Awais!
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel My pleasure !
How long till it's in LR? Anyone know?
Bro which Editing app bro please tell bro 👍
CSI zoom & enhance is finally here
😂
Just please get us FOCUS correction!
Thanks Jesús...
You're welcome, Árpád!
As always appreciate your tips and instructions. You are a true master of your craft. Unfortunately this feature crashes my Photoshop software and I cannot utilize enhance. According to the Adobe Forum this has been a known problem since 11/6/20. "Engineers are looking into it" No suggested resolutions have worked for me with the most up to date Photoshop software. I cannot use Enhanced.
Hi Craig, sorry to hear about your issue. I was unaware of it. Is it a problem with your hardware and software?
I would say it is software. Enhance is the only thing that crashes Photoshop in my computer and it does it immediately. Mentioned in Adobe Forum 11/6/20 "Photoshop 22/Camera raw 13.0.2: Enhance Details crashes on Windows" no resolution that I have found as of yet 3/14/21. Sent 4 crash reports. Everything is up to date on my Adobe software. Just cannot use Enhance at this time and I am rely heavily on ACR to process. Again thanks for taking your valuable time to respond.
Sir.. Make full course of photo shop training... We need it.... Your just awesome... Please sir make a full course..
Thank you for video but when I tried to follow along, my camera raw 13.2 in PS doesn't have the film strip icon on the bottom and when I right click there is no enhance button, plus no three dots to click! Even when I upgraded the dialogue box mentioned the super resolution, too! I'm desperately trying to figure it out! Any advice?
Are you using the Plugin, not the filter? to be sure, open from Bridge. If you don't have Bridge installed then from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU!
Guten Abend....warum ist die Übersetzung in Deutsch nicht mehr möglich!? 🙁
Great 👍
Thank you, NEW GAMING WORLD!
Hi Jesus Ramirez, a few queries.
(1) in view that it increasses file size about 4 times, what is the actual commercial use?
(2) This is even more troublesome when commercial hi-end workflow involves focus stacking od 3-4 shots, each with 3 shot HDR. each RAW itself is in adobe-Rgb profle 48 mb.
Am i in wrong track in understanding about your this teaching? Please help. Thanks.
1. This feature is most useful when you want to print large scale and the original is not giving you the results you want.
2. Yeah, also, the problem might become the final resolution output. This was definitely not designed for scenarios like that or large panos.
I think you ar in the right track :)
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thanks.
Can you not launch ACR plugin without bridge?
From photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
Hi, thanx for your videos mate, and especially how you take your time to explain everything in-depth ;) Can I ask if there is a filter or a tool that makes pages/pictures look high def like for example in a Vogue magazine? Thanx.
Actually its not amazing, considering that GigaPixel was around for a while and still does a better job in most situations and in many ways is more versatile and flexible tool. I don't remember getting as much attention as this even if it keeps getting updates and improving.
I haven't compared it to GigaPixel, but I'll take your word that it does a better job. But that doesn't mean this tool is not "amazing." It still accomplishes something impressive without having to go and purchase another tool, or learn something new.
Of course, Adobe updates get more attention. They're a larger company that offers the industry-standard tools.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel True. But maybe in this case Amazing is a bit over the top. The technology has been around for a while and considering as you said for a company the size of Adobe, I see they invest a lot of time in rainbow logos and changing menus to appease the SJW's but not nearly as much in features and bug fixes. Most of the features they do add these days they buy from other companies and really actually innovate anymore. At least AI should be easy with the company of their budget and resources. Sense AI engine is good but its still not amazing. Most of the stuff they use it it for, like auto selections, applying auto corrections, resizing with "super resolutions" are things other companies have been doing for a while.
If you want to see something truly amazing with AI, check out Nuke 13 and what they have done. You retouch one frame in video, and you let the AI learn what you did and apply it to the rest of the frames in the clip, effectively acting as a flexible assistant. Now, that is amazing. Enlarging a photo with no options to tweak the settings is far less amazing. Just saying. Lot of hype, but limited Wow factor, considering what is on the market today.
Anyway, my critique is more at the Adobe in this case not your channel. So don't take it personally. I love your tutorials. Keep up the good work.
Cheers!
Yeah, Topaz Gigapixel is Very good. For this example Gigapixel would Excel, Even at 400% upscale there would no comparison
@@colvingenealogy Although I don't know what your input or output looks like, except what you wrote, short of being a bug it should not be the case. You can post in Topaz forums your results and maybe I'll see you there. But I've seen people who try software, don't get what they expect and conclude , wrongly the software is the problem. I've upscale thousands of images with GigaPixel and compared it to every other one on the market that is available offline. And at the moment it is overall the best still. I suggest you try testing more or post on forums at Topaz labs under gigapixel forum so we can talk there about the specifics.
@@colvingenealogy Ah, cool. Glad you found what works for you. Cheers!
Woooo Hoooo!! 🙌🏻⚡️💻💥💪🏻
Thank you, TheWebStylist!
How to make special or Pantone color image in Photoshop. Please let me know
Dude, you rule! I learned so much from your channel. Do you mind if i call you sensei?
Sir I have a problem scratch disk pop up is coming I cleaned all temp files then I changed in scratch drive c drive and E drive after that my Photoshop loading so slow when iam using gradient tool it taking time
Loding progress so plz can u tell sir
Does it work with jpegs or only with raw??
I sure look forward to them implementing this in Lightroom. Lately I've been shooting a lot of pictures of small birds and it's hard to get close enough to fill the frame with a 300mm lens which is the longest lens I have. Of course I could open bridge and do it, then import the dng file into LIghtroom and finish it there, but that's several extra steps to go through. The reason I don't like doing them in Photoshop is that when you export them from Photoshop it strips out all the exif data and I've not been able to find a way to force Photoshop to include the exif data when exporting images.
this is epic!!!!
Hi,I have camera raw 13.2 and used one of your tutorial images but when I right click on the image in camera raw , the option I have is "enhance details " and I do not have the super resolution option . Any suggestions appreciated
Peter Haines
Peter, if you do not have Super Resolution and just Enhance Details it means that Camera Raw was not updated. Did you check from your creative cloud app to make sure Camera Raw was updated?
Is that plug-in available in Elements 2021 ?
I don't believe it is.
I have Photoshop 2021 with Raw (not PS CC). When I go to help / Plug ins / Camera Raw it shows i've got 2020 version 13.1.0.658. When I try do do an update it tells me I have the latest Camera Raw. Do I need to use Photoshop CC rather than Photoshop 2021 to use the technology available on version 13.2? I haven't moved toward CC as i keep my photos and back ups on local hard drives.
Ron, Photoshop 2021 is Photoshop "CC." Adobe dropped the "CC" a few versions ago. Unless you want to, Photoshop 2021 does not save to the cloud. So you can keep your files as they are in your local hard drive.
If you have Photoshop 2021 with the latest version of Camera Raw then you should be able to use it.
Make sure you are using the Camera Raw plug in from Bridge, or from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Ok. great. That definitely helps me with the understanding the difference with CC vs. 2021. Thanks Jesus ! .... I tried the super Res. on a PSD file of my image but PSD doesn't work with camera raw plug in. So I converted it to JPEG then Tiff. Both gave me a message saying my images were not compatible with this feature and i needed to work with a 'Bayer type sensor raw image'... I went back to my original file which is a DNG and that DID work.. Unfortunately, I've made many changes from the original image which is now nothing like the original and they are now in the PSD format...... jpeg and tiff will open with camera raw but won't do the super res conversion. I probably just can't be helped with this particular image??
Great Video. Not just trying to tear it down like other Tubers did. I got some real amazing results with portraits and city scapes from 18 and 20 MP canon sensor raws... . I found jpgs didn't work that well for me. Also some natural patterns seem to be difficult for the AI still. Some results actually had digital artefacts, so you have to check your result ... and adjust noise and sharpening as you mentioned 👍
Here we go!
👍🙂
Hey everyone, could someone tell me how to make the brush tilt/rotate so its not painting the frontview but instead its flat on the x axis, like when I want to pain on the floor or ground, hope you understand what I mean, and TIA....
Window > Brush Settings. the use the Circular brush icon to the right of the Angle box to squish it together.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Wow thanks you for taking the time to reply, I feel a bit dumb now, I always see that setting, but never mess with the roundness, just the rotation, thanks you very much...
Great new feature. But can you tell me how much of a difference does this enhance feature makes compared to the old photoshop one?
Rohit, Which old feature are you referring to?
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I'm talking about the resampling method in the Image size tab
@@kangthebonkerer This uses a Machine Learning model. It is much better in most cases.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Alright thanks a lot for clearing this up!!!! Keep up the good work!!!
Possible to learn in iphone 10?
which is the best way to mask hair whenever i try to use any method select and mask color range on busy backgrounds it never works even channel masking it always end up looking something out of minecraft how do i avoid that ????
Amazing Jesus, thank you! How can we open acr plugin from inside the photoshop?
from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel i was just watching streams on adobe cc channel featuring you, and you replied. thank you and take care master, i hope i'll meet you one day teacher!
what is software which use in all photo studios
Well, not ALL studios use the same. Either Lightroom or Photoshop are used in most.
My GPU is old and lazy, like me--took 5 minutes, and I have never heard so much spinning and crazy whirring sounds come out of my computer! It kept going higher and higher until processing finished, and then silence again.
Yeah, Michael, unfortunately, this heavily relies on your GPU. Are you an a laptop? or just an older desktop. It sounds like it was working hard!
9 year old Dell XP8500 w/NVIDIA GeForce GT 640. With a few changes over the years. Windows 10 and a solid state drive, a bit more RAM...it's a DINOSAUR!
Nice
Thank you, bugdet photography!
I would imagine that if you’re using a small jpeg file, that it might help to use the Neural filter that compensates for compression first, before enhancing.
hi, your videos are excellent and amazing. there are so cool and informative. only because of your tutorials I became perfect in photoshop. so please can you also make tutorials on adobe illustrator
Jesus, I was having a problem with right clicking on a picture in Bridge and there was no "Open in Camera Raw" in the pop up list. Also the icon for "Open in Camera Raw" you showed us was grayed out. So in Bridge I went to Edit > Camera Raw Preferences > and in the resulting dialogue box select File Handling. In the section JPEG and TIFF Handling, I changed the JPEG: and TIFF: boxes to "Automatically open all supported ____" in each and fixed my problem. Hope this helps anyone else having my problem. As always the tutorial was great, thank you.
That's a cool feature. What I am missing is the possibility to tweak it, if it's overcooked and artefacts show up... 🤔
Interesting but I'm not convinced that the quality will be good enough. The lens chromatic distortion was way off and the enlargement really exaggerated this. It would be interesting to see the results using ACR chromatic correction, ' before ' up sampling and using it ' after ' the enlargement.
Yeah, Mel. I agree. I should have added the ACR Chromatic correction to make it less noticeable.
Nice.. I also like doing creative thing with photos...
Thank you, AMG Point!
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Most welcome...
Don't use all of the Photoshop features but for something specific...I can refer back to PTC Channel for quick answers. Thanks JR
How can I download adobe bridge?
it deos not work on JPG
Didn't the enlargement create a lot of artifacts?
Generally speaking, it does add artifacts. After all, you're doubling the linear resolution. It's not by any means perfect. But in a lot of cases, the overall image enlargement works better than anything else in Photoshop.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I am comparing with Topaz Gigapixel AI, though I have not compared the two in a precise way. My initial reaction is, that Photoshop is less pleasant to look at with a 2:1 enlargement, but I could be wrong.
@@Eigil_Skovgaard I haven't compared it either so I have no opinion on which is better.
I wonder how it compares to On 1’s Resize app. Adobe’s UI sure looks better, at least.
By the way the subscribe animation and bell sound are really annoying IMO. On other channels I always give a thumb down whenever the host doesn’t mute the bell sound. Just a feedback.
I haven't compared it. I don't know!
Good instructional video but I find that some of the stand alone software out there does a better job.
🤷 Yeah, other tools out there might be better. And as you said, this is just an instructional video on how a new tool works. Thanks for watching!
is this the same as "enhance details 2.0" in photoshop?
Well, they're both used for upscaling. But the way of doing it is different. Since this uses machine learning technology it should give you better results.
Question from an ignoramus: How do you access camera raw plugin from photoshop, I can only seem to go into it from camera raw filter?
Hi, Phil! From photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the File Type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thank you, that seemed to work. Cheers
when i open the images on photoshop, the quality always shows up as 240 ppi
how could I get it up to 300 ppi ?
i’m a beginner and would appreciate your help :)
thanks
Well, that's the ppi that your image was shot in. You can change it to 300 from the Image Size command in Photoshop.
I'm not getting it. Nothing changed except the size. It changed from 72ppi to 300ppi. Big deal. The actual photo had no noticeable difference. I did see something that I need addressed. When I click off the Super Resolution nothing happens and the Raw Details won't allow me to click it. It says "Applicable only to Bayer and XTrans raw files." What does that mean?
Bayer and XTrans raw files are the most common types of raw files. Bayer is used by Sony, Nikon Canon, while XTrans are used by Fuji.
Nothing happening is sort of the point. So this is meant to make your image larger without losing detail or getting blurred edges. In other words, is supposed to look the same when you make an image larger. In some cases, the detail enhancements may give off the appearance of more detail.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thanks so much. I thought something was wrong because your Photoshop shows differently. When I hold the cursor over my image to see the before and after, I see no change. I just see the image is larger, but no sharper.
how to use jpeg files in super resolution ?
I tried this a couple of times but the output was bad, looked like boxes of noise scattered over the pic
It's not a perfect solution, and it gives you better results in raw images. Also, generally speaking, this will give you better results than other enlargement tools in Photoshop.
not appearing in my camera raw
It's nice but these are just the baby steps to the right direction!
Yeah, they will definitely keep improving.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel True. You’re doing very good job. Thanks for your efforts too!
Hi Jesus. What’s the best way to reach you?
Have faith in him, love thy neighbor and turn the other cheek, you'll meet him when your time comes.
Eddy, contact form on my website!
And Ramy, that comment was hilarious! lol
WOW..my file went so big, i need to buy a bigger house:-) tnx for tuto!
😂
Um, this does NOT work on JPEG files. Just tried it, it says JPEG is an unsupported format.....am I missing something?
Hi Kevin, it works on Jpgs. Did you use the Camera Raw plugin, and are you in the latest version of Camera Raw?
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I am on the latest of both, yes. It comes up and says it does not support JPEG files with an "Unsupported file format" error. I've tried it on several different JPEGS just in case there may have been an error with one. I've tried it with .jpeg extension and .jpg extension.
@@Alphadragon1979 That's so weird it works fine on my end on a jpg. Does it work on a raw image on your machine?
If you don't have one you can download the one from the link in the description of this video.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel I will give that a try a little later today and let you know if it did. I find it strange too, everyone says it's suppose to work, so I'm a little baffled.
@@Alphadragon1979 I am having the same issue. Tried several images with the same result.
I get a warning flag that says "Enhance requires graphic card with Metal Support" It has a "Learn more button but only goes on to explain details of the enhance feature but not the "Metal Support" requirement.
I'm in your channell I subscribed, I want to lern thought you.
I just save it after enhancing it, as a PNG then open it back up in camera raw and enhance again.
Nice!
I am still wondering why Emojis can't be removed from a photo, is it possible
I guess one could export the image in a new file (ex: tiff)and reapply superresolution? But I get that this begins to get pointless
Yeah, you could do that. But I'm not sure if the results would make it worth it.
I have tried using this on various jpg and raw files up to about 10MB. The results were not satisfactory and strange artefacts were left randomly across the image. So it must be graphics card dependent. I'm using Intel on board graphics which is admittedly cheap and cheerful and I was expecting a time penalty but this was a disappointment.
I'm wondering if it is the graphics card, or simply that the tool didn't do a good job in your photos.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Could be but I've tried quite a few images of different sizes and I get artefacts every time.
6 seconds? It takes 5 minutes on my computer ☹️
Yeah, it's all based on your GPU. ☹️
I can't get this to work on JPG images. So disappointed.
open via Bridge > Camera Raw - it worked O.K. for me on some very old jpgs
Hi, Lisa! Did you try Sue's suggestion? It should work.
Also, from Photoshop, go to Open As (NOT Open). From the File Type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
@@SueLambertPhotography Thanks Sue. Sad to say this didn't work for me.
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel Thanks for checking in. When I try Open As, I go to Open and then select the file and choose the format, right? I don't have a Camera Raw option in the format dropdown. I have a Photoshop Raw option. When I proceed with the Photoshop Raw option it creates a weird grayscale photo with a double image. Clearly I'm doing something wrong. Is there someplace I can send you screenshots? Thanks a million!
@@lisaroth719 Do you have camera raw installed? From your creative cloud app make sure it is installed. But from the Open As dialog, under file format there should be a camera raw option
I know you did this video 4 months ago but I hope you see this comment. I was running a photo thru Topaz Sharpen AI and notice that it displays an image that I enhanced in Adobe at it's original size. That is, it displays the original dng and the 4x enhanced version at the same size, 100%. If I look at the images in Lightroom or Photoshop they show the enhanced version at the correct, enlarged, size. Have you experienced this? What's going on?
wow
👍🙂
Both this guy and piximperfect always leave things out of their tutorials. So, where are we supposed to find this camera raw plug in? I have PScc, is it available? I have regular camera raw, what's the plug in?
You open it via Bridge.
As I mentioned in the video, if you use Bridge, you don't have to worry about the filter since it will take you straight to the Plugin. If you want to open a raw image then from Photoshop just open it as you would any other image.
What I didn't mention in the video is that if you want to open a JPG, PNG, or Tiff from Photoshop you can go to Open As (NOT Open). From the file type dropdown select Camera raw. Then find your file on your computer.
Topaz Gigapixel still has much much better enhancement results for face portrait photos.
I'll take your word for it. I haven't done a comparison. If you have, you should make a video on it! I would love to see the results.
Amazing New Feature with disappointing results. Lots of chromatic abberation. I got similar results with image size + a few sharpen filters. Machine needs to learn a lot.
Yeah, I also made the mistake of not enabling Chromatic aberration on Camera Raw which would have helped a bit.
Thanks Jesus
You're welcome, mostafa!
Nobody seems to care to mention that you need to have a special Graphics card to be able to use the feature, as if we don't have to buy enough material as it is. Long live the age of obsolescence!
I have a Geforce 1080 from 5 (five) years ago and the feature works perfectly.
@@DavidRFIT I have a AMD Radeon R9 M390 2 GB, it's 4 years old and it doesn't seem to be up to the task. I get a message that says I need a graphics card that has metal support.
George, every version of Photoshop has always had minimum requirements. I know it is frustrating when things don't work for you. I've had the same issues before and I know how annoying it can be.
Adobe and all other companies design their new software to work with the new hardware available to take make better tools. Remember, Photoshop is a professional tool and it is designed as such. But they do try to make it work on machines with slower hardware as much as possible. The age of the hardware is less important than the capacity it has. You could buy a new computer today without a GPU and it wouldn't work as well (or at all) either.
To know the requirements that you need for the latest version of photoshop you can check this link: helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/system-requirements.html
👀
👍🙂
I'm not using Bridge, - only Photoshop and Lightroom.
Click then Open As in Photoshop and select your file, in the FILE TYPE drop-down select CAMERA RAW and then open.
@@richardbradley2641 Thanks for replying, Richard!
Why not look at the quality of this proces as it adds strange artefacts to some images.
So is this becoming a Photoshop add channel then?
Well this is the "Photoshop Training Channel"
And this video was an overview showcasing a new feature.
Is this tool perfect? Of course, not. But the point of this video was to show how a new tool works.
Free tools make superresolution better then photoshop :/
🤷 Sure. There might be better tools out there. The point is that this is a new feature and I was just explaining it.
Since I am not using Bridge I don't find it useful so I'll be waiting for it on the
Lr but thank you all the same, Jesus
From Ps go to Open As and from the dropdown select Camera Raw. You don't need Bridge. :)
@@PhotoshopTrainingChannel thank you I'll try it