Random Touristy Flying Around Boston In The Home Cockpit

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Beware…horrible flying skills on display.
    Just wanted to fly around Boston, see how everything looked while flying around at 300-500 feet or so.
    Absolutely zero planning went into the flight (insert mockery here).
    Also mentioned a few things I’m going to do in the upcoming weeks on this channel as well.

Комментарии • 12

  • @tubecoatue
    @tubecoatue 10 месяцев назад

    Very impressive. Wow. Really nice job.

  • @danielhawley6817
    @danielhawley6817 9 месяцев назад +1

    Better landings: Be on the centerline of the runway 1-2 miles out, be "stabilized" at landing speed adjusted for conditions, fully configured and crossing the threshold within about 100"...reduce power, let the airplane settle...and land when it's ready.

    • @shadetreehomesim
      @shadetreehomesim  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks…appreciate the info, still learning as I go.
      My setup is way better than I am lol…

  • @CessSim
    @CessSim 10 месяцев назад +1

    Looks great mate and well done. The panel looks brilliant.
    Completely agree with you on the downside of building a physical cockpit to match a specific plane....in our cases the C172, however we do get the luxury to flight / practice whenever we want in a fully functioning cockpit with all the bells and whistles..
    Interested to see what PC specs / graphics settings you have dialled in for this (assume FS2020?)
    Perhaps consider how the lighting from the sides is projecting onto the front which is slightly noticeable at the top left and top right. Your rear camera may have auto adjust exposure on which could be affecting the brightness as well...

    • @shadetreehomesim
      @shadetreehomesim  10 месяцев назад

      You assume correctly.
      I’m running a 13900k/1 tb ssd/Nvidia 4080/32 go ddr 5.
      Settings wise, 55 inch TVs are at 3840 x 2160…in MSFS 2020 all settings are on Ultra.
      I hadn’t considered that…and I definitely need to. I’ve been so focused on builds that I didn’t think about that honestly, but I definitely will.
      Very true…having that physical version of the plane handy/at your fingertips is worth it.
      Having said that…I have so many pieces left over (including my 3080 TI PC) that I can throw together a setup that’s generic…which I may “start” on here soon…🤔

    • @CessSim
      @CessSim 10 месяцев назад +1

      ahhh that would explain the smoothness. I am yet to go for the RTX4000 (currently running a 3090Ti) , however I do have a 14900K ready to upgrade from my 12900K. Looks like the 4080 does the trick at triple 4K with no stuttering at max resolution? Using DLSS3 ?
      Something for another video would be some benchmarking tests (I am currently doing some in XP12)

    • @shadetreehomesim
      @shadetreehomesim  10 месяцев назад

      @@CessSim I was able to make it stutter a little, but that was flying through a city at max detail on ultra at 300 ft…not something you normally do.

  • @gloowee
    @gloowee 10 месяцев назад

    I've never taken off with flaps in a Cessna 172. Is this how you were taught?

    • @wilsonle61
      @wilsonle61 10 месяцев назад +1

      I have used 10 degrees of flaps in Cherokee 140(s) and Cessnas. True, I probably did not need them most days. But it does reduce the takeoff roll in most cases.

    • @shadetreehomesim
      @shadetreehomesim  10 месяцев назад +2

      Good question, but I wasn’t really ‘taught’…flight sim enthusiast who just signed up for the self paced ground school stuff.

  • @rodan2852
    @rodan2852 10 месяцев назад

    Just curious what is the realistic cost of these simulators? I could definately see its usefuleness for dedicated practice. Can you program emergency scenarios? Definately pretty cool!

    • @shadetreehomesim
      @shadetreehomesim  10 месяцев назад

      So my “all in” cost (monitors/computer/yoke) was roughly $5000-$5200. Over half of that ($2800) was the PC itself.
      MSFS does allow you to set up failures and issues