The best PhD literature review the world has ever seen

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 июл 2024
  • phd.academy
    When I started my PhD back in 2003, one of the first things my supervisor asked me to do was write a literature review. Wanting to impress my new boss, I decided that I was going to write the best literature review the world had ever seen. So I started reading and writing, but very quickly got overwhelmed by the amount of material that was available, much of which I didn’t really understand…
    So I didn’t end up writing the best literature review the world had ever seen, and in fact that particular review never even got finished. This was an early knock to my confidence… it didn’t crush me, but it just fed that little voice at the back of my head that said I wasn’t good enough.
    Much later I did write a very good literature review, but it was only after figuring out how to work with work with the literature in a more efficient and effective way.
    So in this video I’d like to talk about why working with the literature is so stressful, and introduce you to some other ways of thinking about it.
    0:00 Intro; The best literature review the world has ever seen
    1:33 About me
    2:13 The sheer number of sources
    3:15 Academic papers aren't written to teach
    4:53 Working on the edge of knowledge
    6:05 Not all published research is good
    7:55 The psychological factor
    9:25 How to use the literature effectively without getting overwhelmed
    11:54 Most research is incremental
    14:56 Writing about the literature as a way of building knowledge
    17:09 Closing

Комментарии • 25

  • @SociotechnicalSystems
    @SociotechnicalSystems 11 месяцев назад +14

    Very helpful, indeed. I started my literature review on systems theories the same way - I wanted to embrace a century's worth of theoretical development and came across the same issues you described. I'm a lot more systematic with it now (the irony of the term!). In my experience, delimiting the scope is key.

    • @James_Hayton
      @James_Hayton  11 месяцев назад +6

      It's not just about delimiting the scope- it's about selecting the right sources to help you build your knowledge. Even a narrow scope might have 1000s of papers

  • @user-dn5hi4dy7k
    @user-dn5hi4dy7k 11 месяцев назад +8

    Thank you for the video. It is very helpful. Could you please have a video on the writing part of literature review as well. Perhaps the different types of literature reviews and how one decides to choose a particular type.

    • @MeechNubla
      @MeechNubla Месяц назад

      This pls, Dr Hayton. As well as tips on how to structure a literature review.
      Really find your videos helpful, Dr. Hayton. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

  • @SydneyRover
    @SydneyRover 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you Dr. Hayton for your time and energy in providing a wonderfully helpful video. I am a PhD student in structural engineering, and I can certainly relate to being enthusiastic while at the same time not knowing anywhere near enough of what is in the literature.

  • @chillkroeteYaYa
    @chillkroeteYaYa 11 месяцев назад +2

    Super helpful! Thank you!

  • @PeterIntrovert
    @PeterIntrovert 11 месяцев назад +3

    I am not PhD student and don't plan to work in academia. But I still watch your videos because I am interested in topics of learning and research. You seems to grasp big picture and think like a craftsman that embodied what he know, which I liked.
    It would be nice if you feel like it you broader your content a little on topics like "how to do effective research as independent researcher?" (which mean how to do research in general) and "how to master theoretical topic?" ect. ect.
    I have some reflections about what you said in this video.
    It seems that switch in skills you mentined is like a jump between ordered complicated and closer systems to a chaotic, complex and open systems. There are frameworks to work with complexity and chaos that seems they could be a matrix to solution you are giving. Rationality need to change to fit demand of the field. From best rule based practice to rule of tumbs and other heuristics, feedback loops, setting boundries and occasionally introducing a "noise" (a little of offtopic discussion with colleagues).
    I wonder what would you think and say about advices like this ruclips.net/video/vtIzMaLkCaM/видео.html about writing scientific papers.
    There is perspective that I heard for first time and change the way I think. Maybe it's something widely used, I don't know.

  • @tamoghnodas5906
    @tamoghnodas5906 11 месяцев назад +7

    I have been following your content for a long time. While it's extremely genuine and helpful in general, since it is clear you are reflecting upon your own journey, in a lot of videos including this one, the key takeaways are not clear. It might be a bit more helpful if you just summarized the key takeaways at the end.

    • @James_Hayton
      @James_Hayton  11 месяцев назад +4

      Fair point about the summary of key takeaways! I'll make sure I add one to future videos.

  • @preethivlogs7
    @preethivlogs7 8 месяцев назад

    Thank you! It's really helpful:)

  • @ekundayothompson4410
    @ekundayothompson4410 6 месяцев назад

    A very clear explanation made with great erudition.

  • @rameshmahadeo1700
    @rameshmahadeo1700 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you. I am writing my PhD Law Literature Review Chapter.

  • @AhmadAli453
    @AhmadAli453 9 месяцев назад

    Dear Sir, You are doing great job. Am a new PhD student and have not a strong background. Can you please suggest me the best way / roadmap to become a good researcher. How to dot connecting the literature to get an idea, etc......... I have lots of confusion. I know my research topic but am stuck how to start and where to take start to write my first research paper.

  • @user-cn8di7wl9c
    @user-cn8di7wl9c 6 месяцев назад

    Could you please make a “10 best first sentences in the literature ”

  • @eashavazi40
    @eashavazi40 8 месяцев назад

    I how I wish I had seen this video ten years ago, when I started the phd journey... 😢

  • @ogechukwublessing141
    @ogechukwublessing141 8 месяцев назад

    This is huge information. Thank you. Am done with my P.hD, but I love academics, so I want to develope myself more so I can help many more students coming to me. Pls how do I go about it.

  • @user-pn2wg6kl6i
    @user-pn2wg6kl6i 11 месяцев назад +2

    I am writing an MA thesis in literature. I am struggling with finding the most critical material for my branch of research. Any tips for someone in the MA dasertion stage.

    • @James_Hayton
      @James_Hayton  11 месяцев назад +2

      What do you mean by most critical, in your case? And how are you currently trying to do it?
      As I said in the video, the approach depends on the stage you're at and what you're trying to achieve with the literature, so I can't give useful advice without knowing what you're trying to do

  • @skjamaludin
    @skjamaludin 9 месяцев назад

    Hi Dr., for a STEM-related PhD, how long do you think the duration should be? Do you think 4-5 years is too long? Would appreciate your views, thank you.

    • @James_Hayton
      @James_Hayton  9 месяцев назад +2

      It depends where you are. In the US, for example, it often takes longer. In the UK, full time, 3-4 years is common. It's good to speak to people currently doing a PhD wherever you are

    • @skjamaludin
      @skjamaludin 9 месяцев назад

      @@James_Hayton Thank you for your opinion, Dr.

  • @vijaypatilsataramaharashtr3417
    @vijaypatilsataramaharashtr3417 11 месяцев назад +1

    Respected sir, I am subscriber of your channel. I submitted Ph.D by your motivation i need book How I get