Human are not capable of changing a behavior they see as beneficial in the here and now. Anyone who things human are going to make the necessary sacrifices to slow the effects of co2 on the environment hasn’t been paying attention. We have three choices 1. “Turn the ship around”. Make a major and massive change to the way we live and to our economy. 2. “Build Life Boats”. Start now to limit the impact of climate change, move people away for coastal land we know will be flooded, start building infrastructure to lands the will be able to grow food. 3. “Stay the Course”. Do nothing but talk about doing something Care to guess which one we have chosen?
We are NOT adapting to either WEF Mandatory Energy Austerity or Compulsory Climate Tithes. Their New Climate CathoIic _Ratis Brusselicus sp._ can go pound sand.
Restoring nature is good for every aspect of our predicament, good for degrading pollutants, stabilizing the water cycle, storing carbon and slowing or even reverting climate change. And it will be good for our physical and mental health too.
Restoring Nature and actually being STEWARDS of the magnificent Creation we have been given should be every human citizen's objective and every country's objective!
Nice dream. Not possible when you combine national socialism [which is the economic model so called leftists use] with capitalism....worldwide. Next stop. Narcissism and mass denial.
Regenerative agriculture among Farmers heals the soil and makes a farmer solvent. If all agriculture proceeded this way it would make a huge effect on the climate.
Regenerative agriculture requires rotating paddocks of grazing livestock, why WEF and PETA is so desperate to use farts and avian flu to wipe out the US ranching operations. They want to AGGREGATE small holdings, not RESTORE soil tilth. They are monsters.
NASA published a time lapse video starting in the mid 80s up to 2020 which displays the consistent and terrifying steady loss of Arctic Sea loss. Data recently became available from the Navy of decades of measurements of sea ice thickness which was needed to know where nuclear submarines can surface. These measurements surprised scientists as the ice was thinner than expected, and the Naval Postgraduate School now has a running 6 month sea ice prediction and current condition monitoring site. The fear is the sea ice could almost entirely break apart and drift out to open waters during a high wind event polar storm creating what’s described as a blue ocean event and through loss of reflect-ability cause an estimated equivalent of the last 25 years of greenhouse gas accumulation. Arctic Sea ice becoming so thin or small in extent could result in an inability for an anchoring point for the seasonal winter ice to develop from, also causing the blue ocean event. Some reputable scientists had previously predicted that this would have already occurred, and some prophesize an abrupt tipping point between a livable planet and a short-lived calamity.
It's -6F in Barrow, far to the south of the Arctic ice cap, that is shrinking then GROWING every year, and depends entirely on the North Pacific circulation feeding the Bering Sea. The Pribilovs are heading below zero in a few days. When I fished out there *40 years ago* for Red King Crab during winter season, we didn't encounter any sea ice. *Magic CO2!*
Farmers in Australia have always used fire as a tool and fought bushfire as a whole community unit. All farmers have at least one fire appliance. When you see smoke you respond immediately, no one tells you what to do. Over the last 50 years, government fire authorities have assumed control over these community groups. They are useful for coordinating multiple agencies and have unlimited funding, but they have no feet on the ground, so rely on the local people. There are now many semi-rural settlers infiltrating these areas with no understanding of wildfires. This phenomenon, along with worsening climate extremes, demands continual modification of emergency planning. Farmers are accustomed to working in dangerous situations and being responsible for their own safety. But where there is a chain of responsibility, everything must be moderated to the lowest common denominator. It is so easy to lose someone's life in a bushfire situation, I have been involved with it multiple times.....there is no going back after that happens. The world is changing, and everything is getting more difficult. The old system of rating fire danger, now needs one extra level. Everything must be able to adapt quickly now.
How do you adapt to 120° days? How do you adapt to hurricane how do you adapt to a tornado? How do you adapt to forest fires? How do you adapt to large swaps of suburbia being rendered unusable because of climate? How do you adapt to that, the issue is that we are not facing something we can adapt to and fix and that we need to adjust our policies to reality instead of feeling the world with that there’s someway to adapt to living in a burnt out home
It was 50C (120F) when I was i Morocco *40 years ago*. The worst hurricanes in US history and highest temperatures *were early 20thC* before widespread oil & gas. Forest fires were declining, until Antifa started setting fires and burning out new subdivisions. If you want to establish a 'policy to save your home' _mandate all houses be cinder block._ *Guam did that years ago, and breezes right through major typhoons with no damage.*
I have seen that it is possible to lower surface temperatures through revegetation. Much better to do that than just accept that humans are bad and must go extinct.
It is possible to change surface temperatures. We do it unconsciously by de-vegetation, deforestation, and desertification. We can do it consciously by revegetation, reforestation, and combating desertification. pure.knaw.nl/portal/files/5859064/Liu_The_Great_Green_Wall_of_China.pdf
@@robertmarmaduke186 You don't think use of oil and gas was widespread 40 years ago? (checks notes....) in 1984? Seriously? You do not understand the history of climate change. Those droughts and famine in Somalia in the early 80s? THAT WAS CLIMATE CHANGE. Sigh...
Very good, this is exactly correct, but we have to get active and not just discussing and enlightening. It has to be a combination of all these factors but we have to start restoration. UP WITH TREES IMPROVE THE BREEZE EVERYBODY GLOBALLY LEND A HAND PLEASE!!!!😮😅❤🎉
There is no "adapting to". Active, sincere intervention (as implausible as that now seems) would be the only solution. But those solutions are antithetical to our entrenched power structure and their corporate cronies. There are truly "gypsies in the palace" who are living large at the expense of the entire edifice of human endeavor. It is good to be old.
The only topic that needs to be discussed is the aerosol masking effect and a blue ocean event, the latter which we have no ability to stop as there will be based on best science no sea ice by 2030. The loss of Arctic sea ice is estimated to reduce aerosol masking over land by 113% and have the atmosphere heating effect equivalent to adding the last 25 years of greenhouse gas accumulation.
@@NikFeysno. Helen is a bit mistaken. One paper came out not as predicting what will happen but to study sequence of events necessary to a BOE. Conceivable if 4 hot years (in Arctic) in a row, all seasons elevated, happen then could have 56 BOE days by 2030 20 year margin of error
Official 97% Agree IPCC AGW is +1.8C by 2100 or +0.031% change per year, the 'last 25 years of GHG' *would mean a 0.75% change by 2030.* You need to learn to do the Math.
Right now 100s of millions of people are going hungry living and others are dying in dying in poverity. If as many people want they would be lifted out if poverty. They do not choose to be poor and given the choice would live like the average citizen of the United States, as shown by the millions of immigrants who find their way there. The result would be an increased negative impact on the environment.
Nothing about the need to transform our social relations to remove considerations from our decisions on production and distribution so that "unprofitable" eco-friendly decisions can be made. Without this unfortunately all these fine words mean nothing.
There is absolutely NOTHING 'eco friendly' about Carbon Capture that burns more fossil grid energy than the Carbon Credit _dispensations to pollute_ that it renders to al-Gore's Carbon Cap & Trade Scheme (actual legal name). It's a MIC RACKET, like the Pentag0n.
29 COPS= Zero emissions reductions. The track record of this organization is deplorable. There is now 850 giga tons of C02 in the atmosphere, enough to kill all Life on Earth 20X over. Climate is now accelerating exponentially. The exponential impacts of multiple cascading tipping points will vastly accelerate climate change. Huge step index increase in global temperatures in which humans cannot survive are on our doorstep. It is too late now. The train left the station long ago. The time to address climate change was in 1988 when Dr. Carl Sagan and Dr. James Hansen warned the US Congress, who did nothing to protect all life on Earth. The economy and building their nuclear military machine was more important to the fear and greed based politicians.
I am amazed when people mention safety and comfort as something almost deserved for humans. Let's get real, the only way to have either is to work together in our communities to help each other. It sure won't come from our government or insurance companies!
I think that people need to realize that there are only two ways out. Continuing to be negative about what has already happened is to ensure catastrophic predictable outcomes. Restoring ecological functionality wherever possible makes our lives meaningful and can help to bring us back into a survivable relationship with the Earth. We have to consider what is happening and realize that it our understanding and behavior that is causing the problem. ruclips.net/video/DO3BpkGnSnM/видео.htmlsi=qbk1KGdSgouNxX53
There’s a *very* *talented* musician that claims Africa are leading the way, that emitting carbon makes negligible difference to our predicament and finally that we shouldn’t bother at all about our fossil fuel usage, instead focus all of our energy on plankton cultivation because that’s our only hope.
The belief we can *adapt* to what we have wrought is the utmost in arrogance. We will have to deal with it, but we are no better prepared to adapt than the penguins or whales. We have learned NOTHING.
We are adapting to self annihilation
yes that bit was a bit waffly , and repeating things we are not going to do isn't helping either .
‘Adapting’ is an generous adjective.
Human are not capable of changing a behavior they see as beneficial in the here and now. Anyone who things human are going to make the necessary sacrifices to slow the effects of co2 on the environment hasn’t been paying attention. We have three choices
1. “Turn the ship around”. Make a major and massive change to the way we live and to our economy.
2. “Build Life Boats”. Start now to limit the impact of climate change, move people away for coastal land we know will be flooded, start building infrastructure to lands the will be able to grow food.
3. “Stay the Course”. Do nothing but talk about doing something
Care to guess which one we have chosen?
We are NOT adapting to either WEF Mandatory Energy Austerity or Compulsory Climate Tithes. Their New Climate CathoIic _Ratis Brusselicus sp._ can go pound sand.
Acceptance will set you free. These poor gents are stuck in the crazy hopium prison.
Restoring nature is good for every aspect of our predicament, good for degrading pollutants, stabilizing the water cycle, storing carbon and slowing or even reverting climate change. And it will be good for our physical and mental health too.
Restoring Nature and actually being STEWARDS of the magnificent Creation we have been given should be every human citizen's objective and every country's objective!
Nice dream. Not possible when you combine national socialism [which is the economic model so called leftists use] with capitalism....worldwide. Next stop. Narcissism and mass denial.
Regenerative agriculture among Farmers heals the soil and makes a farmer solvent. If all agriculture proceeded this way it would make a huge effect on the climate.
Regenerative agriculture requires rotating paddocks of grazing livestock, why WEF and PETA is so desperate to use farts and avian flu to wipe out the US ranching operations. They want to AGGREGATE small holdings, not RESTORE soil tilth. They are monsters.
Yes, regenerative ranching and farming sequester's carbon in the soil and produces healthier food 🎉
Were many decades past adaptation..
NASA published a time lapse video starting in the mid 80s up to 2020 which displays the consistent and terrifying steady loss of Arctic Sea loss. Data recently became available from the Navy of decades of measurements of sea ice thickness which was needed to know where nuclear submarines can surface. These measurements surprised scientists as the ice was thinner than expected, and the Naval Postgraduate School now has a running 6 month sea ice prediction and current condition monitoring site. The fear is the sea ice could almost entirely break apart and drift out to open waters during a high wind event polar storm creating what’s described as a blue ocean event and through loss of reflect-ability cause an estimated equivalent of the last 25 years of greenhouse gas accumulation. Arctic Sea ice becoming so thin or small in extent could result in an inability for an anchoring point for the seasonal winter ice to develop from, also causing the blue ocean event. Some reputable scientists had previously predicted that this would have already occurred, and some prophesize an abrupt tipping point between a livable planet and a short-lived calamity.
Phytoplankton production is up where ice is thin
It's -6F in Barrow, far to the south of the Arctic ice cap, that is shrinking then GROWING every year, and depends entirely on the North Pacific circulation feeding the Bering Sea. The Pribilovs are heading below zero in a few days. When I fished out there *40 years ago* for Red King Crab during winter season, we didn't encounter any sea ice. *Magic CO2!*
Farmers in Australia have always used fire as a tool and fought bushfire as a whole community unit. All farmers have at least one fire appliance. When you see smoke you respond immediately, no one tells you what to do.
Over the last 50 years, government fire authorities have assumed control over these community groups.
They are useful for coordinating multiple agencies and have unlimited funding, but they have no feet on the ground, so rely on the local people.
There are now many semi-rural settlers infiltrating these areas with no understanding of wildfires.
This phenomenon, along with worsening climate extremes, demands continual modification of emergency planning.
Farmers are accustomed to working in dangerous situations and being responsible for their own safety. But where there is a chain of responsibility, everything must be moderated to the lowest common denominator.
It is so easy to lose someone's life in a bushfire situation, I have been involved with it multiple times.....there is no going back after that happens.
The world is changing, and everything is getting more difficult. The old system of rating fire danger, now needs one extra level. Everything must be able to adapt quickly now.
Thank you for sharing your valuable insights.
How do you adapt to 120° days? How do you adapt to hurricane how do you adapt to a tornado? How do you adapt to forest fires? How do you adapt to large swaps of suburbia being rendered unusable because of climate? How do you adapt to that, the issue is that we are not facing something we can adapt to and fix and that we need to adjust our policies to reality instead of feeling the world with that there’s someway to adapt to living in a burnt out home
It was 50C (120F) when I was i Morocco *40 years ago*. The worst hurricanes in US history and highest temperatures *were early 20thC* before widespread oil & gas. Forest fires were declining, until Antifa started setting fires and burning out new subdivisions. If you want to establish a 'policy to save your home' _mandate all houses be cinder block._ *Guam did that years ago, and breezes right through major typhoons with no damage.*
I have seen that it is possible to lower surface temperatures through revegetation. Much better to do that than just accept that humans are bad and must go extinct.
It is possible to change surface temperatures. We do it unconsciously by de-vegetation, deforestation, and desertification. We can do it consciously by revegetation, reforestation, and combating desertification.
pure.knaw.nl/portal/files/5859064/Liu_The_Great_Green_Wall_of_China.pdf
@@robertmarmaduke186 You don't think use of oil and gas was widespread 40 years ago? (checks notes....) in 1984? Seriously? You do not understand the history of climate change. Those droughts and famine in Somalia in the early 80s? THAT WAS CLIMATE CHANGE. Sigh...
A very good presentation!!!...well done!!!...
Thanks for watching!
Thank you for your support!
We need 800,000 community's globally, exactly 💯😎
Thanks Paul: ruclips.net/video/tDPMcdd7F0A/видео.htmlsi=eaIGLuh_a_5Pp7e
Very good, this is exactly correct, but we have to get active and not just discussing and enlightening. It has to be a combination of all these factors but we have to start restoration. UP WITH TREES IMPROVE THE BREEZE EVERYBODY GLOBALLY LEND A HAND PLEASE!!!!😮😅❤🎉
Adapting doesn’t mean reductionism but being reflective.
MEERS
The only meaningful debate should be how to stop fossil fuels.... everything else is a distraction.....
That's what AdoIf said.
There is no "adapting to". Active, sincere intervention (as implausible as that now seems) would be the only solution. But those solutions are antithetical to our entrenched power structure and their corporate cronies. There are truly "gypsies in the palace" who are living large at the expense of the entire edifice of human endeavor. It is good to be old.
We live in the paradise built by Boomers
"So long and thanks for all the fish" such as it is
You forgot America is a Democracy, not your Leftist version of 1917 Bolshevism.
An article about how coal use globally is at a peak, but use at the high rate will continue.
The only topic that needs to be discussed is the aerosol masking effect and a blue ocean event, the latter which we have no ability to stop as there will be based on best science no sea ice by 2030. The loss of Arctic sea ice is estimated to reduce aerosol masking over land by 113% and have the atmosphere heating effect equivalent to adding the last 25 years of greenhouse gas accumulation.
There is no silver bullet, therefore, we need to discuss all options to go forward.
So that basically means it's game over by 2031-'34?
@@NikFeysno. Helen is a bit mistaken. One paper came out not as predicting what will happen but to study sequence of events necessary to a BOE.
Conceivable if 4 hot years (in Arctic) in a row, all seasons elevated, happen then could have 56 BOE days by 2030
20 year margin of error
Guy McPherson thinks so.
Official 97% Agree IPCC AGW is +1.8C by 2100 or +0.031% change per year, the 'last 25 years of GHG' *would mean a 0.75% change by 2030.* You need to learn to do the Math.
Right now 100s of millions of people are going hungry living and others are dying in dying in poverity.
If as many people want they would be lifted out if poverty. They do not choose to be poor and given the choice would live like the average citizen of the United States, as shown by the millions of immigrants who find their way there.
The result would be an increased negative impact on the environment.
Nothing about the need to transform our social relations to remove considerations from our decisions on production and distribution so that "unprofitable" eco-friendly decisions can be made. Without this unfortunately all these fine words mean nothing.
Perhaps that’s the paper _you_ could write.
There is absolutely NOTHING 'eco friendly' about Carbon Capture that burns more fossil grid energy than the Carbon Credit _dispensations to pollute_ that it renders to al-Gore's Carbon Cap & Trade Scheme (actual legal name). It's a MIC RACKET, like the Pentag0n.
29 COPS= Zero emissions reductions. The track record of this organization is deplorable. There is now 850 giga tons of C02 in the atmosphere, enough to kill all Life on Earth 20X over. Climate is now accelerating exponentially. The exponential impacts of multiple cascading tipping points will vastly accelerate climate change. Huge step index increase in global temperatures in which humans cannot survive are on our doorstep. It is too late now. The train left the station long ago. The time to address climate change was in 1988 when Dr. Carl Sagan and Dr. James Hansen warned the US Congress, who did nothing to protect all life on Earth. The economy and building their nuclear military machine was more important to the fear and greed based politicians.
"There is now 850 giga tons of C02 in the atmosphere, enough to kill all Life on Earth 20X over. "
Argument is growth of emissions would have been worse.
and tipping points cascade is unlikely to happen as such
Materialism isn't the basis of our lives now??.. We're fucked, what a start to the video on our impending doom 🤦🏽♂️
Welcome to the Age of Consequences.
As long as the'I want it all' types of Human exist, then the rest are doomed.
Unfortunately that's so true.
I am amazed when people mention safety and comfort as something almost deserved for humans. Let's get real, the only way to have either is to work together in our communities to help each other. It sure won't come from our government or insurance companies!
The climate situation is very depressing. On a lighter note what's with the hat Paul?
Yes, restore Earth's biosystems, don't destroy them.
Life is not sacred. Life is an accident.
It is noise in the Universe. Look around:
black, deaf, cold, dust, radioactive, and Black Holes.
Life is self-organizing and anti-entropy
You swirl with black holes 🕳
I think you're totally wrong! Life IS sacred and is a gift from our Creator - God! And every human on this Earth has a duty to look after Nature!
I think that people need to realize that there are only two ways out. Continuing to be negative about what has already happened is to ensure catastrophic predictable outcomes. Restoring ecological functionality wherever possible makes our lives meaningful and can help to bring us back into a survivable relationship with the Earth. We have to consider what is happening and realize that it our understanding and behavior that is causing the problem.
ruclips.net/video/DO3BpkGnSnM/видео.htmlsi=qbk1KGdSgouNxX53
John Liu sure is high on the hopium.
Lol!!! 😂😂
He said necromass!
Wrt climate, Disruption is a better word than Change. But it'll get watered down to nothing, just like any other word we can come up with.
@Paul - We need automatic sprinkler systems on roofs in wildfire zones so even if people evacuate their homes may hopefully be saved.
It's always the cure, rarely prevention with Human mentality.
There’s a *very* *talented* musician that claims Africa are leading the way, that emitting carbon makes negligible difference to our predicament and finally that we shouldn’t bother at all about our fossil fuel usage, instead focus all of our energy on plankton cultivation because that’s our only hope.
Hes wrong and right. Burning 🔥 fossil fuels ⛽️ is whats destroing the oceans from supporting plankton.
We're cooked. Cheers.
The belief we can *adapt* to what we have wrought is the utmost in arrogance. We will have to deal with it, but we are no better prepared to adapt than the penguins or whales. We have learned NOTHING.
Stopped watching after the "White City" fantasy model.