Just got the GH5M2 having used the GH5 for a few years and this profile is really interesting. I compare it with Kodak Portra when developed on paper. That film stock is nearly always out of stock as well.
Thank you for your comment. I researched some web site, Lumix (Panasonic) engineer said that Kodak Portra is one of the reference. so I have to say that your insight is great.
you should try editng l. classic neo with +3 contrast, -3 shadow and highlights, +3 saturation, +1 hue, low film grain, off for color noise, and whatever you want for sharpness and noise reduction. It is really good, try it please.
thank you for your recomendation. I'll try your parameters. As a side note, my favorite parameter set is below: Contrast +1.5 Highlite: 0 Shadow: -5 Saturation: +3 Hue: +1 Low film grain and colour noise is ON. I prefer that lower sharpness and weak noise reduction.
Just got the GH5M2 having used the GH5 for a few years and this profile is really interesting. I compare it with Kodak Portra when developed on paper. That film stock is nearly always out of stock as well.
Thank you for your comment. I researched some web site, Lumix (Panasonic) engineer said that Kodak Portra is one of the reference. so I have to say that your insight is great.
you should try editng l. classic neo with +3 contrast, -3 shadow and highlights, +3 saturation, +1 hue, low film grain, off for color noise, and whatever you want for sharpness and noise reduction. It is really good, try it please.
thank you for your recomendation. I'll try your parameters.
As a side note, my favorite parameter set is below:
Contrast +1.5
Highlite: 0
Shadow: -5
Saturation: +3
Hue: +1
Low film grain and colour noise is ON.
I prefer that lower sharpness and weak noise reduction.