HLS in the World | Marbury v. Madison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2017
- As part of Harvard Law School's bicentennial celebration, Supreme Court advocates and constitutional law scholars Laurence Tribe ’66, Harvard’s Carl M. Loeb University Professor, and Kathleen Sullivan ’81, former dean of Stanford Law School, reargued the landmark 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, in the Ames Courtroom. Hearing the case was an all-star quartet of HLS alumni who serve on federal appeals courts: Merrick Garland ’77, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, presided. He was joined by Judge Joseph Greenaway Jr. ’81 of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, Judge Jane Kelly ’91 of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Judge Patricia Millett ’88, who also serves on the D.C. Circuit. Harvard Law School Story Senior Lecturer Susan Davies served as faculty host for the reargument.
The Marbury v. Madison event was part of the HLS in the World bicentennial summit which took place at Harvard Law School on Friday, October 27, 2017. Read more: today.law.harvard.edu/marbury... For more on HLS' Bicentennial events, go to: 200.hls.harvard.edu/
![Rich Dunk (Ft. DaBaby) - BIG DAWG [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pz2ewsSKAEM/mqdefault.jpg)
I imagine Merrick Garland thinking, "man, I could have been an actual Supreme Court Justice. Now all I can do is pretend to be John Marshall..."
And now he runs the entire DOJ. Yay
@@dragonflarefrog1424 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - A WEAPONIZED AGENCY ALLOWING THE SPYING OF AMERICANS.
40:30 “Don’t take it from me. Take it from my client. He wrote the Constitution.”
If only these incredible lawyers knew how microphones worked, I might have actually been able to enjoy this video...
If it came down to it I would write a concurring opinion to a lessor degree, still enjoying the vid
there is closed captioning. JUST READ.
This is a very good video for we the people who aren't legal pundits. Harvard is "the institution" well known to the world of law. Thank you for posting. 📫 ❤
Not anymore
The Marbury VS Madison was the first constitutional review of legislation. Also, thank you so much for this video since I am studying the case and I started one hour ago. What amazes me is that there are videos like this and I am so thankful because I really understood the case better. Thank you
Judge Joseph Greenaway - "Let's stay in the present. I like 1803!"
I feel like it took Laurence Tribe every fiber of his body to not respond with "Now I don't see color but...are you sure?"
Any disagreement should have reasons and sometimes evidence’s
It only gets better the longer you listen, as unfortunate as that results in my limited free time, I learned that the arguments at the highest levels can often be at the base, "I believe that" and "I view it as". Perspectives really.
39:18 arguments presented without “I believe that” and “I view it as”. Everyone does it, it’s just how people talk. Opinion is assumed, but even they know when things are no longer “opinions.”
I wish the camera person was alert enough to show the faces of those while they were introduced. I had to skip the introduction, since it was not functional...
Thank you
Hey, is this the same Charles Lee that Hamilton complained about?
Instead of me, he promotes Charles Lee, makes him second in command! "I'm a General--WHEEEEE!"
Congratulations
The difference between the ideals of law and the actual practice is, as I say in my book about judicial corruption, "...often a wide a dismal gulf."
Interesting
What's ur book?
Back then the Justice of the peace was paid by receiving a "cut" of the judgement....
Don’t judge any one’s who’s you don’t even know for sure, and he will not be able to define himself!
Garland as the Chief Justice John Marshall....what a denigration of Marshall.....
Lol plz, Garland is smarter and morally superior to Marshall. You’re just an angry RepubLOSERcan
hi harvard law school
"I enjoy 1803!" 🤣🤣🇺🇲
Constitution is the rule of law
No law made by any branch that is in conflict is not law it's repugnant. Then it's void. Any part or conflict. If any part then all is void.
First lady needs to learn how microphones work. So distracting for her to keep fading up and down because she moves her mouth away from the mic.
She also speaks at high speed and smears pronunciation, plus hits the vocal fry at the end of many sentences. Sloppy speaker in a hurry.
I WISH I WAS TOO DEAD TO CARE IF INDEED I CARED AT ALL ... YOU DON'T NEED TO BOTHER, I DON'T NEED TO BE ... SO YOU FED ME SHIT TO DIGEST ... ONCE I HOLD ON I WON'T LET GO TILL IT BLEEDS ..... LOOKING AT YOU THROUGH THE GLASS DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH TIME HAS PASSED ....
We also have the right of freedom of movement witch is defined as travel and we have a right to travel without a license and registration for privete gain as long as we are not getting paid for hire privete travel is a fundamental right to go from point A to point B in our everyday life correct the matter of fact new Hampshire understand that right its for all 50 states agencies are not happy about it but they have no say over man and woman that are not in commerce for hire
Nope. Under article I section 8 clause 17 if you hold SSI. By accepting benefits and privileges from the govt you imply (two forms of contracts: Implied and Expressed) that they own you and all your affairs as a result, they can regulate it in any nature they may wish. By accepting SSI using it for bank accounts, jobs, licenses, or even Minimum Contact (legal definition) you gave your Constitutional rights and replaced them with Privilages given to you by article I branch. Same reason why you need MARRIAGE license. State is your God. You failed to exercise your INHERITED rights and now we are here.
Articulo..13
Da exm .Fundo da prova todos países edu cine
what is this about ?
They are rearguing Marbury v. Madison. One of the most historic constitutional cases of all time
It is a dark time for the Rebellion. Although the Death Star has been destroyed, Imperial troops have driven the Rebel forces from their hidden base and pursued them across the galaxy.
Evading the dreaded Imperial Starfleet, a group of freedom fighters led by Luke Skywalker have established a new secret base on the remote ice world of Hoth.
The evil lord Darth Vader, obsessed with finding young Skywalker, has dispatched thousands of remote probes into the far reaches of space....
This case is soooo faaaar from modern life of this country that now has 3 constitutions (continental (actual Constitution), Municipal and Territorial)😳, and “…in the United States, where prosecutors and judges are political. They are either elected or appointed by politicians (and subject to confirmation by other politicians). We are the only country in the Western world that has so politicized our system of justice.”
Page 67 “Letters to a Young Lawyer” by Alan Dershowitz
EMERGENCY
Private Court of Justice UNITED STATES USA
THE WOMEN RULE IN MY VIEW.
When you say, "In God we trust" and "God bless America" do yoy really mean it ? IT's clear that the law the man , himself gives, is limited and insuficient por the goals it pursues .
God drives from German word GOOD. In essence they mean in Good Intentions we will do our best to serve matters at hand with principles set in place by the Constitution, which forms govt, limits govt and ONLY protects YOUR NATURAL INHERITED RIGHTS that YOU may exercise under Supreme Law of the land.
Would be must more enjoyable if only they would interrupt even more, how can the case continue if the speaker can only complete a sentence every hundred. The jokes were way too many, too much breakage of the dialogue.
Am I the only one who spanks it while watching this
No you are not.
Ahhahahah
Good one brother
As-salamuyalaikum
Hello, Everyone
Pakistani Azhar ershateamibangalikori,omanal,Fouzmeshariqaalak
Merrick Garland is a joke
A crazy Republican who has no place at Harvard
@@dragonflarefrog1424 you’re right I went to MIT ;) why would I want to go to a school who can’t define what a women is? Ivy League delusional danger. Eat it soy boy
All Obama judges...
Does that make you upset...
Also, the fact you said they are all Obama judges shows you're also a liar and or ignorant. All of them are not Obama judges....
@@raheyna8888 oh wow.... merrick garland was appointed by Bill Clinton. You really got me there 🙄
@@euphegenia Keep looking...you missed another one too
@@euphegenia how does that make this historical re enactment any worse?
Harvard teaches law students to interpret the constitution. The constitution clearly states that the constitution shall not be construed, which means it shall not be interpreted.
Where does it say that? lol
Please show me where in the Constitution it states, "The Constitution shall not be construed." I'm waiting................
@@raheyna8888
The 9th amendment...
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
Others, meaning, all other rights.
@@raheyna8888
The 11th amendment....
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
@@raheyna8888
“The constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”
-Alexander Hamilton
Don't you people have anything better to do with your lives?
JB24 Speaks - I know. Like drink beer, watch football, and hang with the boys, right? Legal scholarship is for the birds.... or the nerds. Ha
@@TeachAManToAngle Honestly, I think it's ok to have good ambition. I think we should live our lives to improve the world for the next generation. So, the goal of our lives should be to change the world for the better. The best way to do that is to get involved in politics not work in the courts.
@@J.B24 Not get involved in the courts? lol. Real intellectual here...
@@raheyna8888 They are re-litigating a case that was settled 200 years ago. Take that energy and apply it to trying to cure a disease. You'll feel better.
@@J.B24 they’re lawyers, what disease can they cure?