im saying this with the intention of avoiding confusion, not nit-picking. for the word "إبراهام" in the Qira'ah of Imam Ibn Aamir, there is no kasrah on Haa'. Baarak Allahu Feekum Ustadh
3:10 About this claim: لَا تُحَرِّكْ بِهِۦ لِسَانَكَ لِتَعْجَلَ بِهِۦٓ (Move thou not thy tongue with it to hasten it. (75:16) إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا جَمْعَهُۥ وَقُرْءَانَهُۥ Upon Us is its gathering and its recitation. (75:17) فَإِذَا قَرَأْنَـٰهُ فَٱتَّبِعْ قُرْءَانَهُۥ And when We recite it, follow thou the recitation thereof. (75:18) ثُمَّ إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا بَيَانَهُۥ Then upon Us is its clarification.) (75:19) He surely did understand, but some ayat were revealed with a time where he alaihi salam did not, as logic shows... So i add these verses as a nuance perhaps... for us to consider. Some verses came later to explain the Qur'an in detail, an example of this is this verse: وَٱلَّـٰتِى يَأْتِينَ ٱلْفَـٰحِشَةَ مِن نِّسَآئِكُمْ فَٱسْتَشْهِدُوا۟ عَلَيْهِنَّ أَرْبَعَةً مِّنكُمْ فَإِن شَهِدُوا۟ فَأَمْسِكُوهُنَّ فِى ٱلْبُيُوتِ حَتَّىٰ يَتَوَفَّىٰهُنَّ ٱلْمَوْتُ أَوْ يَجْعَلَ ٱللَّـهُ لَهُنَّ سَبِيلًا And those who commit sexual immorality among your women, call to witness against them four from among you; then if they bear witness, confine them to houses until death takes them, or God makes for them another path. (4:15) Then the other path on how to deal with adulterers and fornicators is revealed: ٱلزَّانِيَةُ وَٱلزَّانِى فَٱجْلِدُوا۟ كُلَّ وَٰحِدٍ مِّنْهُمَا مِا۟ئَةَ جَلْدَةٍ وَلَا تَأْخُذْكُم بِهِمَا رَأْفَةٌ فِى دِينِ ٱللَّـهِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّـهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْـَٔاخِرِ وَلْيَشْهَدْ عَذَابَهُمَا طَآئِفَةٌ مِّنَ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ The unchaste woman and the unchaste man: lash each one of the two with a hundred lashes, and let not pity for them take you concerning the doctrine of God if you believe in God and the Last Day. And let witness their punishment a number of the believers. (24:2) So, we can see this was a process, revelation by stages, also the case of the vision the Prophet alaihi salam had, he did not know everything that was going to happen, and Allah subhanahu wa taala made it seem as if the enemy were less, and this was good and in the end he gave victory to the believers... To mean, Muhammad alaihi salam did not know the unseen, only what he got revealed with visions and the Qur'an, and what Allah willed at some times... قُل لَّآ أَقُولُ لَكُمْ عِندِى خَزَآئِنُ ٱللَّـهِ وَلَآ أَعْلَمُ ٱلْغَيْبَ وَلَآ أَقُولُ لَكُمْ إِنِّى مَلَكٌ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰٓ إِلَىَّ قُلْ هَلْ يَسْتَوِى ٱلْأَعْمَىٰ وَٱلْبَصِيرُ أَفَلَا تَتَفَكَّرُونَ Say thou: “I say not to you: ‘I possess the treasuries of God,’ or: ‘I know the Unseen,’ nor do I say to you: ‘I am an angel.’ I follow only what is revealed to me.” Say thou: “Are the blind and the seeing equal?” Will you then not take thought! (6:50) This is something to remember, since some scholars say with no evidence Muhammad alaihi salam is the best of creation, or that he is sinless... him and other prophets, absolutely not, they were humans, we shall not idolize them by saying such, Allah subhanahu wa taala chooses whom he wills from among his servants, Alhamdulillah, no need to exaggerate the praises of any of them, upon them be the peace and blessings of our Lord...
Many great scholars have stated that Muhammad ﷺ is the best of creation: Muslim (4223) narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I will be the leader of the sons of Adam on the Day of Resurrection, and the first one for whom the grave is opened, and the first one to intercede and the first one whose intercession will be accepted.” Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Sharh Saheeh Muslim: This hadeeth indicates that he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is superior to all of creation, because the view of Ahl al-Sunnah is that humans are better than the angels, and he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is the best of all humans and others. End quote. Other scholars: Imam al-Shaafa’i in al-Umm (4/167) Imam ‘Abd al-Razzaaq al-San’aani in al-Musannaf (2/419) Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (1/313 and 5/127 and 468) Ibn al-Qayyim in Tahdheeb al-Sunan, hadeeth no. 1787, quoting from ‘Awn al-Ma’bood. Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari, commentary on hadeeth no. 6229 Al-Mardaawi in al-Insaaf (11/422) Al-Aloosi in Rooh al-Ma’aani (4/284) Al-Taahir ibn ‘Ashoor in his Tafseer (2/420) Al-Sa’di in his Tafseer (51, 185, 699) Muhammad al-Ameen al-Shanqeeti in Adwa’ al-Bayaan (9/215) Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (2/76, 383)
@YourRandomRando Some marrations says that he allegedly said, alaihi salam: don't say i'm better than Yusuf (as) But you ignore that. Saying he is the best lf creation is even more than saying he is better than Yusuf. He also said, allegedly, that "do not exaggerate my praises like Christians exaggerated the praises of the son of Maryam" or the likes. Before, Christians also said Isa ibn Maryam was the best of creation, it's the last step in shirk before entering major shirk... I quoted from memory, so pardon me, although you accept as authentic rephrasals... so you can't complaint... when your sources are weak already. Your justification for calling him, alaihi salam, the best of creation, i still don't see it anywhere? "Great scholars" also said Allah is one in three... Them being smart or knowing does not mean they are right. We need evidence, i don't take the word of anyone for anything, unless they be quoting the scripture. People who know way more than us, on their fields, are upon great misguidance... Being a scholar, per se means nothing. And some are right on some, again, and wrong on other areas. Don't fall into shirk. Answer if you will, where did the shirk of the nasara come from? From scholars or from laymen? It came from scholars, the scholars, pressured by politics, but that also happens to this ummah, voted on the trinity falsehood... So, before talking as if you take the scholars as Lords besides Allah, think deeper into this brother. We can't say things we don't know. Who or what the best of creation is is not mentioned in the scripture, therefore, we can't say it's this or that. Then, just to be safe, let us remain silent on this... there is no reason to talk about the unseen.
Similarly, there are the subtle exceptions of certain qiraat that have elements of other qiraat. Example qiraa of Hafas from Asim has one single "imala" in "majreaha" in 11:41, while other qiraat have many different ones. Also, in Hafs from Asim, there is only one single occurrence of a "damma" on a third person pronoun, "alaihu" in 48:10, while it's almost the sole way to pronounce third person pronouns in some other qiraat. Also the placement of those exceptions is very subtle and significant in meaning and also in phonatics. Subhan Allah. Those same things that ignorants claim to disprove the Quran, actually further proves that it hasn't changed based on people's desires. If it were upon people to change them they would've changed the qiraat to make them, to what appears to us limited humans, to be more consistent. But millions of Muslims have read them and still read them this way.
I don't believe Mohammad didn't rear or write but rather he did know how he can read and write and he mostly likely was writing the verse as they were coming down to him.
(NOT FULL LIST OF ACTIONS except little(only a little) ) Step 1-Try harder, use your brain, Ask Allah for help, Try your best, Stay on it, Repeat again, rEpeat again, rePeat again, repEat again, repeAt again, repeaT again,, ,,
كَلَّآ إِنَّهَا تَذْكِرَةٌ No, indeed! It is a reminder, (80:11) فَمَن شَآءَ ذَكَرَهُۥ So whoso wills might remember it, (80:12) فِى صُحُفٍ مُّكَرَّمَةٍ In honoured pages, (80:13) (Note of the translator: 1. The Qur’an regards itself as something carefully written down from the very beginning. The Traditionalist, perhaps predictably, has a different account of how the Qur’an came to be written down, one which contradicts the Qur’an both in terms of generalities and specifics.) مَّرْفُوعَةٍ مُّطَهَّرَةٍۭ Exalted and purified, (80:14) بِأَيْدِى سَفَرَةٍ By the hands of scribes (80:15) كِرَامٍۭ بَرَرَةٍ Noble and virtuous. (80:16) Allah knows best...
ubayy ibn ka'b, not to be confused with abdullah ibn ubayy who was the head of munafiqun. Ubayy ibn Ka'b was a rightous sahabi and a writer of wahi, as mentioned in this video
@twopolaar599 جزاك الله. The only writer of wahi I knew of was zaid ibn thabit, I didn't know all four of the khulafa rashideen were also scribes of wahi
❤️Narrated Abu Huraira: I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, Verily Allah created Mercy. The day He created it, He made it into one hundred parts. He withheld with Him ninety-nine parts, and sent its one part to all His creatures. Had the non-believer known of all the Mercy which is in the Hands of Allah, he would not lose hope of entering Paradise, and had the believer known of all the punishment which is present with Allah, he would not consider himself safe from the Hell-Fire."❤️🇵🇸🤲🏼
Allah as the writer of the Quran can not miss these letters in these similar verses SPECIALLY if describing a historical event!! It's an error in Quran clear and similar.
@@Arabic101 In one of your other videos "How do you deal with THIS?" talking about the sign لا that forbids you from stopping in the middle of the ayah, while watching you said something interesting, you said "Don't end your recitation here and definitely don't go to ruku" Does this mean in an ayah where you have a like a م which means stop, can you go to ruku in the middle of that ayah, I've been searching for answer please answer.
😂😂😂😂 Brother this is laughable. You can't even call this "nice arabic" let alone a parrallel to the Quran. ustadh hast (in this Channel) a Video about if someone can make a surah, Look it Up :)
@@Malaysia_Islam they don't even rhyme and have astheticness the first 2 lines are stolen from Surah fatihah and have similar verses from Quran cheap knock off if Quran said it is you who we worship chatGpt would say I only worship god it's like fake Minecraft games
4:50, please don't include the interpretive translations in your speech. People who do not know Arabic, think that "collecting in the heart of the Prophet PBUH" is in the Ayat, while it's not there.
As Salamu alaykum. This comment is not relevant to the video. I have been having trouble keeping track of all the types of madd. Can you post a video listing every type of madd?
3:56 "every letter". That's why some scholars of Islam of the opinion that the prophet was unlettered only before the comming of revelation. Not after.
@abuyusufalfawzan qadhi iyad said scholars with this opinion among them abu al-walid al-baji. Also from ibn sam'ani, abu dhar al-harawi. There was a long ongoing discussion on this topic by Muhaddith. They predates the orientalists. But has anyone heard the arguments from both sides?
Barak Allah fikom, i would like to share your videos on X is there a possibility for you to share your content there to spread further knowledge for broader audience
That is the translation from Sahih International; the text in square brackets is additional context to help an English speaker fully understand what is being said. Seeing your other comments on here, it feels to me that your understanding of Islam has filled you with arrogance; that your understanding of the Qur'an and Islam is the only possible correct answer, leading you to close heart and ears to any other possibilities. I pray that God opens your mind and cleanses you of this arrogance.
@@ninja3212 Wherever it leads. But if i'm arrogant for asking to translate the text for what it says... The text does not say compile on the heart. It's refering to compiling in general. You may precisely see this talks about compiling the Qur'an in text format... So it's upon Allah subhanahu wa taala not upon men, as you claim they compiled it only after Muhammad alaihi salam departed... I showed precisely to raise that point... In the end, Allahu 3alam of course. But i don't think accepting a view uncritically is correct. In these, you may disagree, that's fine, in other parts it's more obvious what we have been told is not what the Qur'an is saying... I know i will be hated for this, upon Allah let the believers put his trust, so i trust in him... and i don't fear the criticism of the critic. I do fear making mistakes, and i don't mind being corrected, but with authentic sources, not weak hearsay traditions... Those channels are the ones upon where shirk survives... they are conductive for that. I hope you understand my point, whatever right i said Alhamdulillah, and whatever wrong, then i pray i'm corrected to a better understanding. Peace be upon the believers
@@ninja3212 What particular comment? One of them was a nuance, since the traditional claim is one idk if i agree on, since they don't provide evidence and they use that to legitimize their power as a cleargy since they filter what hearsay gets authenticated and which does not... And i just wanted to remind the people of something the Qur'an does say for a reason, that prophet Muhammad alaihi salam, was a man... with his mistakes and noble characteristics of course... And Sunnis idolize him, the same way Shia idolize Ali... and that is wrong. That does not mean they were bad, AT ALL, like Christians try to claim... i'm not saying that... If you think i'm being arrogant on this, i mean God knows best, i don't think myself better than them... They went under a lot, and i for now have had it easy... perhaps too much... I also appreciate corrections, and i've learnt some things the tradition say may have basis... while others completely do not... like the kissing of the black stone idols in the female setting they put it today especially... THAT is not Islam... That is shirk, and there is no way around that. But there are middle points, positions, i'm still considering who is right... I'm open for the tradition being right... And i'm not a modernist either, i don't believe in modern cosmology, nor many of their claims... nor in history, i think a lot of fakery happened there... If you differ with me, that's no issue, my enmity is towards mushriks, who take idols (stones, religion, idolizing prophets/saints... fake deities, sheikh/rabbi worship) and serve them besides Allah... I know not everyone from the sects do that... but most do... Even outside of the main sects, many also fall for that... And i pray i am free of that... And i pray you see my point, even if we don't agree in everything... Salam
In tafsir of ibn kathir it mentions that this word جمعه is referring to the Qur’an being gathered in the heart of the Messenger (saw). The verse before this one 75:16 gives the context.
@@Bing.chilling.1 That's the interpretation of Ibn Kathir, i'm not saying it's invalid, but i don't see it being the only valid interpretation. By adding such brackets, essentially you are forcing an interpretation unto the reader. I'm not totally against them, if they sometimes help by adding things lost in translation, but if they are used to force interpretations, i personally don't like it. You may disagree, but if i was to translate the Qur'an to my language, i would like the reader to be in a similar position than if he be reading the arabic original... If this make sense. If a word can be translated 1 to 1, with ambiguity, i would rather preserve the ambiguity, even if i have a particular interpretation. Hope this makes sense. Again i'm not saying that interpretation is wrong. It's just that the text does not say that, and it's good we preserve the original meanings.
really? Its 32 pages long, and I can read 20 pages in one hour, so the 90 minutes matches up with my recitation. Reading 32 pages in less than 30 minutes means that you are reading more than 1 page a minute, which is 1 line every four seconds. When you read this fast, it is easy to accidentally drop tajweed rules while maintaining that speed, so I recommend you to slow down your recitation a bit. Of course, if you are confident that you can read the surah with perfect tajweed, then dont let me stop you.
@@twopolaar599 You see im a hafiz so its easy plus i am the most you know give importance to tajweed out of my classmates and i try to understand so i learnt few words from arabic so i can sometimes remember the next ayah or word if i forget by understanding what the ayah it talking about. kinda like making a guess but i dont know arabic. just few words.
@@YT_Xmega Im sorry if it can off condescending, but I have been in many hifz classes and have heard even huffaz reading extremely fast to the point where they dont pay any attention to tajweed at all. Its good to know that you genuinely put importance to tajweed, unlike many others out there. Also, I have also memorized surah al an'am completely and speak arabic at a semi-fluent level alhamdulillah but, despite being confident with this surah, it still takes me > 1 hour to read it. So, my main point was just to ask you to make sure that you prioritize tajweed over simply reading the surah, which Alhamdulillah you say you do.
To determine whether a message has been transmitted accurately, one must compare the received message with the original message. In the absence of the original message, the accuracy of transmission cannot be determined. Same is the case with the Quran. This exercise is not possible because we do not have access to the original Quran personally conveyed by the Prophet to his scribes. Therefore, claiming that the Quran’s transmission from the Prophet to us today in the 21st century is perfect -- is utterly baseless.
We have quranic verses and Qurans which date to the first century Hijra, and none of them differ, and the rock inscriptions and manuscripts when combined make up the full Quran
@@MostRightWingManInBritain There is no original manuscript of even a single verse that can be verified as directly dictated by the Prophet to his scribes, which would serve as the original message to compare with today's text. Assuming we possessed a first-century manuscript, all we could then assert is that the Quran we have today aligns exactly with that version from the first century which we have. As I said earlier, the accuracy of transmission of a message can only be calculated by comparing it to the original text, not to copies of it.
While what you are saying is theoretically true about needing the original in most cases (imagine I told you something, then I died and then told 5 people a modified version of what I had said), the consistency of the Qur'an manuscripts with the texts we have today along with many other factors demonstrate that the Qur'an was faithfully preserved. You don't have to just take muslim's words for it, you can read Oriental, nonmuslim 'scholars' who doubted the traditional muslim narrative about the preservation of the Qur'an and then came around to accepting the traditional narrative after attempting and failing to breach its preservation from many angles. As Drs. Fekry stated, we have multiple scribes who transcribed the Qur'an and there are no meaningful differences in the manuscripts. Yes, manuscripts with transcribal errors exist, but you can see that they were regarded as errors. Compare this to the preservation of literally any other historic text before the advent of printing presses and other technologies. Its no comparison. Also, you're probably keen to ignore this, but we have oral transmission as well and a certification process. You can literally go to a lot of these reciter's houses and see a certificate with every teacher in the chain since the time of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) and if they've been authorized in that recitation mode, you will not hear a single difference. "...Its not the eyes that are blind, rather it is the hearts in the chests that are blind" -Surah Hajj
@@stevesmith4901 Actually there are manuscripts such as the one in the University of Birmingham which is carbon dated to be between 570-640 AD and it is 100% accurate to the Quran we have now, and also Uthman's Quran from the first century Hijra is the exact same as the ones we have now in terms of the words, they're 1:1 accurate, it's dated at around 680 AD ish, so this means that the sahabians were still alive at this point in time
@@fahadsyed3861 I'm going to reiterate my earlier point, as it seems to have been overlooked. The narrator in the video claims that the Quran we have today is exactly the same as the one dictated by the Prophet to his scribes, asserting a "PERFECT" transmission-implying 100 percent accuracy. He even provides examples to support this claim of flawless transmission. My counter to this is simple: to assess the accuracy of a transmitted message, the original must be available for comparison. Without the original, we cannot substantiate any claims about the accuracy of transmission, perfect or otherwise. Since we don’t have the original Quran, any claim of "perfect" transmission is, therefore, unsubstantiated. Now, for the sake of argument, let’s assume we have identical manuscripts of the Quran from a very early period of Islam. This would only indicate that these manuscripts were copied from a common source. One could then argue that if we were to find this original source manuscript, there would be a high probability it would match its copies that we possess. However, even in this scenario, the claim remains probabilistic, only verifiable in the event the source manuscript is found and can be compared to. This is not to say that the Quran we have today cannot be traced back to the Prophet's time. The text itself provides ample evidence to locate it within that time and place of the Prophet. However, without the original, we cannot make any definitive statements about the accuracy of its transmission like the narrator does in the video.
6:28 i would like to have a seperated video about this please 😅
Your research is fascinating so i would appreciate if you make a video about it 💛
جزاكم الله خيرا
Allahumma barik. You're right, no one is talking about this. SubhanAllah.
As always, an amazing lesson with an outstanding presentation. Jazak Allah Khair 🤲🏻
Allah make you firm on islam.jazak allah khair
AMEEN
Thank ALLAH for his blessings on us
Jazak-llahu khairan kasiran wa barak-llahu fik
أحسن الله إليك
Although I knew some of this already and may even disagree with a little, this was a fantastic mergence, and your most enchanting video yet!
Great video, tysm!
جزاكم الله خيرًا
dont u mean جزاك الله خيرا؟
@@Free_PalestinePLEASE
Plural form is used as a way of showing extra respect.
im saying this with the intention of avoiding confusion, not nit-picking. for the word "إبراهام" in the Qira'ah of Imam Ibn Aamir, there is no kasrah on Haa'. Baarak Allahu Feekum Ustadh
Maasha Allah
I loved the video ❤. May Allah Accept from all of us ❤
Jazak allah khair
Thanks for info 👍👍👍♥️♥️♥️
3:10 About this claim:
لَا تُحَرِّكْ بِهِۦ لِسَانَكَ لِتَعْجَلَ بِهِۦٓ
(Move thou not thy tongue with it to hasten it.
(75:16)
إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا جَمْعَهُۥ وَقُرْءَانَهُۥ
Upon Us is its gathering and its recitation.
(75:17)
فَإِذَا قَرَأْنَـٰهُ فَٱتَّبِعْ قُرْءَانَهُۥ
And when We recite it, follow thou the recitation thereof.
(75:18)
ثُمَّ إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا بَيَانَهُۥ
Then upon Us is its clarification.)
(75:19)
He surely did understand, but some ayat were revealed with a time where he alaihi salam did not, as logic shows...
So i add these verses as a nuance perhaps... for us to consider.
Some verses came later to explain the Qur'an in detail, an example of this is this verse:
وَٱلَّـٰتِى يَأْتِينَ ٱلْفَـٰحِشَةَ مِن نِّسَآئِكُمْ فَٱسْتَشْهِدُوا۟ عَلَيْهِنَّ أَرْبَعَةً مِّنكُمْ فَإِن شَهِدُوا۟ فَأَمْسِكُوهُنَّ فِى ٱلْبُيُوتِ حَتَّىٰ يَتَوَفَّىٰهُنَّ ٱلْمَوْتُ أَوْ يَجْعَلَ ٱللَّـهُ لَهُنَّ سَبِيلًا
And those who commit sexual immorality among your women, call to witness against them four from among you; then if they bear witness, confine them to houses until death takes them, or God makes for them another path.
(4:15)
Then the other path on how to deal with adulterers and fornicators is revealed:
ٱلزَّانِيَةُ وَٱلزَّانِى فَٱجْلِدُوا۟ كُلَّ وَٰحِدٍ مِّنْهُمَا مِا۟ئَةَ جَلْدَةٍ وَلَا تَأْخُذْكُم بِهِمَا رَأْفَةٌ فِى دِينِ ٱللَّـهِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّـهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْـَٔاخِرِ وَلْيَشْهَدْ عَذَابَهُمَا طَآئِفَةٌ مِّنَ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ
The unchaste woman and the unchaste man: lash each one of the two with a hundred lashes, and let not pity for them take you concerning the doctrine of God if you believe in God and the Last Day. And let witness their punishment a number of the believers.
(24:2)
So, we can see this was a process, revelation by stages, also the case of the vision the Prophet alaihi salam had, he did not know everything that was going to happen, and Allah subhanahu wa taala made it seem as if the enemy were less, and this was good and in the end he gave victory to the believers...
To mean, Muhammad alaihi salam did not know the unseen, only what he got revealed with visions and the Qur'an, and what Allah willed at some times...
قُل لَّآ أَقُولُ لَكُمْ عِندِى خَزَآئِنُ ٱللَّـهِ وَلَآ أَعْلَمُ ٱلْغَيْبَ وَلَآ أَقُولُ لَكُمْ إِنِّى مَلَكٌ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰٓ إِلَىَّ قُلْ هَلْ يَسْتَوِى ٱلْأَعْمَىٰ وَٱلْبَصِيرُ أَفَلَا تَتَفَكَّرُونَ
Say thou: “I say not to you: ‘I possess the treasuries of God,’ or: ‘I know the Unseen,’ nor do I say to you: ‘I am an angel.’ I follow only what is revealed to me.” Say thou: “Are the blind and the seeing equal?” Will you then not take thought!
(6:50)
This is something to remember, since some scholars say with no evidence Muhammad alaihi salam is the best of creation, or that he is sinless... him and other prophets, absolutely not, they were humans, we shall not idolize them by saying such, Allah subhanahu wa taala chooses whom he wills from among his servants, Alhamdulillah, no need to exaggerate the praises of any of them, upon them be the peace and blessings of our Lord...
Very good.
❤
May allah give you reward that is never ending
Many great scholars have stated that Muhammad ﷺ is the best of creation:
Muslim (4223) narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I will be the leader of the sons of Adam on the Day of Resurrection, and the first one for whom the grave is opened, and the first one to intercede and the first one whose intercession will be accepted.”
Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Sharh Saheeh Muslim:
This hadeeth indicates that he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is superior to all of creation, because the view of Ahl al-Sunnah is that humans are better than the angels, and he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is the best of all humans and others. End quote.
Other scholars:
Imam al-Shaafa’i in al-Umm (4/167)
Imam ‘Abd al-Razzaaq al-San’aani in al-Musannaf (2/419)
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (1/313 and 5/127 and 468)
Ibn al-Qayyim in Tahdheeb al-Sunan, hadeeth no. 1787, quoting from ‘Awn al-Ma’bood.
Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari, commentary on hadeeth no. 6229
Al-Mardaawi in al-Insaaf (11/422)
Al-Aloosi in Rooh al-Ma’aani (4/284)
Al-Taahir ibn ‘Ashoor in his Tafseer (2/420)
Al-Sa’di in his Tafseer (51, 185, 699)
Muhammad al-Ameen al-Shanqeeti in Adwa’ al-Bayaan (9/215)
Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (2/76, 383)
@YourRandomRando Some marrations says that he allegedly said, alaihi salam: don't say i'm better than Yusuf (as)
But you ignore that.
Saying he is the best lf creation is even more than saying he is better than Yusuf.
He also said, allegedly, that "do not exaggerate my praises like Christians exaggerated the praises of the son of Maryam" or the likes.
Before, Christians also said Isa ibn Maryam was the best of creation, it's the last step in shirk before entering major shirk...
I quoted from memory, so pardon me, although you accept as authentic rephrasals... so you can't complaint... when your sources are weak already.
Your justification for calling him, alaihi salam, the best of creation, i still don't see it anywhere?
"Great scholars" also said Allah is one in three...
Them being smart or knowing does not mean they are right.
We need evidence, i don't take the word of anyone for anything, unless they be quoting the scripture.
People who know way more than us, on their fields, are upon great misguidance...
Being a scholar, per se means nothing.
And some are right on some, again, and wrong on other areas.
Don't fall into shirk.
Answer if you will, where did the shirk of the nasara come from?
From scholars or from laymen?
It came from scholars, the scholars, pressured by politics, but that also happens to this ummah, voted on the trinity falsehood...
So, before talking as if you take the scholars as Lords besides Allah, think deeper into this brother.
We can't say things we don't know.
Who or what the best of creation is is not mentioned in the scripture, therefore, we can't say it's this or that.
Then, just to be safe, let us remain silent on this... there is no reason to talk about the unseen.
JazakAllahu Khayran.
Jazakhallah Khaira
ياريت نسخة من نفس الفيديو باللغة العربية ❤
Quran is amazing !
Allahumma barik ❤
Similarly, there are the subtle exceptions of certain qiraat that have elements of other qiraat. Example qiraa of Hafas from Asim has one single "imala" in "majreaha" in 11:41, while other qiraat have many different ones. Also, in Hafs from Asim, there is only one single occurrence of a "damma" on a third person pronoun, "alaihu" in 48:10, while it's almost the sole way to pronounce third person pronouns in some other qiraat.
Also the placement of those exceptions is very subtle and significant in meaning and also in phonatics.
Subhan Allah. Those same things that ignorants claim to disprove the Quran, actually further proves that it hasn't changed based on people's desires. If it were upon people to change them they would've changed the qiraat to make them, to what appears to us limited humans, to be more consistent. But millions of Muslims have read them and still read them this way.
jazak allah xayr, I am thinking of checking your haroofi products.
Subhanallah
I don't believe Mohammad didn't rear or write but rather he did know how he can read and write and he mostly likely was writing the verse as they were coming down to him.
ما شاء الله
Hi there! I wanted to ask what whiteboard or app do you use?
Salam!
Assalamu alikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu. Can u plz mention the link of companion app
Wa alikom asslam wa rahamtullahi wa barakatuh,
arabic101.org/lhtapp/
Assalamoalikum
Can you please tell how to download your free e books of understanding the quran in arabic ?
Hi, which platform is using to creat videos like this, pls help
(NOT FULL LIST OF ACTIONS except little(only a little) )
Step 1-Try harder,
use your brain,
Ask Allah for help,
Try your best,
Stay on it,
Repeat again,
rEpeat again,
rePeat again,
repEat again,
repeAt again,
repeaT again,, ,,
كَلَّآ إِنَّهَا تَذْكِرَةٌ
No, indeed! It is a reminder,
(80:11)
فَمَن شَآءَ ذَكَرَهُۥ
So whoso wills might remember it,
(80:12)
فِى صُحُفٍ مُّكَرَّمَةٍ
In honoured pages,
(80:13)
(Note of the translator: 1. The Qur’an regards itself as something carefully written down from the very beginning. The Traditionalist, perhaps predictably, has a different account of how the Qur’an came to be written down, one which contradicts the Qur’an both in terms of generalities and specifics.)
مَّرْفُوعَةٍ مُّطَهَّرَةٍۭ
Exalted and purified,
(80:14)
بِأَيْدِى سَفَرَةٍ
By the hands of scribes
(80:15)
كِرَامٍۭ بَرَرَةٍ
Noble and virtuous.
(80:16)
Allah knows best...
4:52 what is the leftmost arabic name on the screen there?
ubayy ibn ka'b, not to be confused with abdullah ibn ubayy who was the head of munafiqun. Ubayy ibn Ka'b was a rightous sahabi and a writer of wahi, as mentioned in this video
@twopolaar599 جزاك الله. The only writer of wahi I knew of was zaid ibn thabit, I didn't know all four of the khulafa rashideen were also scribes of wahi
i want to do videos like yours , how do you do the writing graphics ? god bless you
❤️Narrated Abu Huraira:
I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, Verily Allah created Mercy. The day He created it, He made it into one hundred parts. He withheld with Him ninety-nine parts, and sent its one part to all His creatures. Had the non-believer known of all the Mercy which is in the Hands of Allah, he would not lose hope of entering Paradise, and had the believer known of all the punishment which is present with Allah, he would not consider himself safe from the Hell-Fire."❤️🇵🇸🤲🏼
ماشاءالله
SubhanAllah 🫀
Amazing
Allah as the writer of the Quran can not miss these letters in these similar verses SPECIALLY if describing a historical event!!
It's an error in Quran clear and similar.
🤲🕋💫💫💫
Mash Allah
yess❤
I want to learn quran recitation from a to z,,,where can i learn from? Any suggestion?
I know a perfect academy
My uncle's daughter take with them from years f you want an academy
Quran In Heart Academy has a native Arabic speakers
The verses of the quran ayaths in this video disappear in a split second. Can you make sure it remains a little longer to ba able to take notes
Pause the video
فوق العاده
Where we can get your books ?
And what is your name ?
store.arabic101.org
❤❤❤
سلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Can you make Quran playlist with your voice
Here's an entire channel with this, brother
www.youtube.com/@arabic101vocals
Barak Allahu feekum
@@Arabic101 In one of your other videos "How do you deal with THIS?" talking about the sign لا that forbids you from stopping in the middle of the ayah, while watching you said something interesting, you said "Don't end your recitation here and definitely don't go to ruku" Does this mean in an ayah where you have a like a م which means stop, can you go to ruku in the middle of that ayah, I've been searching for answer please answer.
I haven't watched yet but there's some ayahs, 1 in Fussilat and one in Naml, different by only 1 letter.
Brother, earlier I met a person who made a surah like an al quran, he used chatgpt then chat gpt for make a surah, this is the surah, is it actually the same?
بسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ
إنَّ اللَّهَ خَالِقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ، وَهُوَ عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ 1
وَجَعَلَ فِي الْكُونِ آيَاتٍ لِمَن يُؤْمِنُ بِهِ 2
فَتَأْمُلُوا فِي خَلَقِهِ، فَإِنَّهُ يُبَيِّنُ الْحَقِّ 3
وَاذْكُرُوا نِعَمَ اللَّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ، فَإِنَّهَا كَثِيرَةٌ 4
وَكُونُوا مَعَ الصَّادِقِينَ، فَإِنَّهُمْ مَنْ يُحِبُّهُمُ اللَّهُ 5
وَاسْتَغْفِرُوا لِذُنُوبِكُمْ، فَإِنَّ الرَّبِّ قَرِيبٌ مُجِيبٌ 6
وَتَوَكَّلُوا عَلَى اللَّهِ فَإِنَّهُ كَافٍ لَكُمْ .7
. وَأَحْسِنُوا إِلَى النَّاسِ، فَذَلِكَ مِنْ خُلُقَ الْمُتَّقِينَ .8
وَابْتَغُوا فِي مَا آتَاكُمُ اللَّهُ الدَّارَ الْآخِرَةَ 9
إنَّ اللَّذِينَ يُكَذِّبُونَ بِالْحَقِّ هُمُ الْخَاسِرُونَ 10
😂😂😂😂 Brother this is laughable. You can't even call this "nice arabic" let alone a parrallel to the Quran. ustadh hast (in this Channel) a Video about if someone can make a surah, Look it Up :)
@@The27Abdul ok so is this surah made by chatgpt the same as the Quran? or did he just copy and paste al quran?
@@Malaysia_Islam they don't even rhyme and have astheticness the first 2 lines are stolen from Surah fatihah and have similar verses from Quran cheap knock off if Quran said it is you who we worship chatGpt would say I only worship god it's like fake Minecraft games
Don't worry it's not and there is linguistic errors donne by chatgpt
1:25 1:55 3:00
Please provide us in Hindi language
Subtitles
4:50, please don't include the interpretive translations in your speech. People who do not know Arabic, think that "collecting in the heart of the Prophet PBUH" is in the Ayat, while it's not there.
Allahu Akbar
❤
As Salamu alaykum. This comment is not relevant to the video. I have been having trouble keeping track of all the types of madd. Can you post a video listing every type of madd?
Allahumma barik
3:56 "every letter". That's why some scholars of Islam of the opinion that the prophet was unlettered only before the comming of revelation. Not after.
As-Salām ʿalaykum, which scholars hold this opinion?
@abuyusufalfawzan qadhi iyad said scholars with this opinion among them abu al-walid al-baji. Also from ibn sam'ani, abu dhar al-harawi. There was a long ongoing discussion on this topic by Muhaddith. They predates the orientalists. But has anyone heard the arguments from both sides?
In short, they agree that prophet is ummiy. But differ in the meaning. The say ummiy means people of umm al-qura.
Barak Allah fikom, i would like to share your videos on X is there a possibility for you to share your content there to spread further knowledge for broader audience
4:09 That's not what the verse says brother, why do you insert into the Qur'an?
That defeats the point, precisely.
That is the translation from Sahih International; the text in square brackets is additional context to help an English speaker fully understand what is being said. Seeing your other comments on here, it feels to me that your understanding of Islam has filled you with arrogance; that your understanding of the Qur'an and Islam is the only possible correct answer, leading you to close heart and ears to any other possibilities. I pray that God opens your mind and cleanses you of this arrogance.
@@ninja3212 Wherever it leads.
But if i'm arrogant for asking to translate the text for what it says...
The text does not say compile on the heart.
It's refering to compiling in general.
You may precisely see this talks about compiling the Qur'an in text format...
So it's upon Allah subhanahu wa taala not upon men, as you claim they compiled it only after Muhammad alaihi salam departed...
I showed precisely to raise that point...
In the end, Allahu 3alam of course.
But i don't think accepting a view uncritically is correct.
In these, you may disagree, that's fine, in other parts it's more obvious what we have been told is not what the Qur'an is saying...
I know i will be hated for this, upon Allah let the believers put his trust, so i trust in him... and i don't fear the criticism of the critic.
I do fear making mistakes, and i don't mind being corrected, but with authentic sources, not weak hearsay traditions...
Those channels are the ones upon where shirk survives... they are conductive for that.
I hope you understand my point, whatever right i said Alhamdulillah, and whatever wrong, then i pray i'm corrected to a better understanding.
Peace be upon the believers
@@ninja3212 What particular comment?
One of them was a nuance, since the traditional claim is one idk if i agree on, since they don't provide evidence and they use that to legitimize their power as a cleargy since they filter what hearsay gets authenticated and which does not...
And i just wanted to remind the people of something the Qur'an does say for a reason, that prophet Muhammad alaihi salam, was a man... with his mistakes and noble characteristics of course...
And Sunnis idolize him, the same way Shia idolize Ali... and that is wrong.
That does not mean they were bad, AT ALL, like Christians try to claim... i'm not saying that...
If you think i'm being arrogant on this, i mean God knows best, i don't think myself better than them...
They went under a lot, and i for now have had it easy... perhaps too much...
I also appreciate corrections, and i've learnt some things the tradition say may have basis... while others completely do not... like the kissing of the black stone idols in the female setting they put it today especially...
THAT is not Islam...
That is shirk, and there is no way around that.
But there are middle points, positions, i'm still considering who is right...
I'm open for the tradition being right...
And i'm not a modernist either, i don't believe in modern cosmology, nor many of their claims... nor in history, i think a lot of fakery happened there...
If you differ with me, that's no issue, my enmity is towards mushriks, who take idols (stones, religion, idolizing prophets/saints... fake deities, sheikh/rabbi worship) and serve them besides Allah...
I know not everyone from the sects do that... but most do...
Even outside of the main sects, many also fall for that...
And i pray i am free of that...
And i pray you see my point, even if we don't agree in everything...
Salam
In tafsir of ibn kathir it mentions that this word جمعه is referring to the Qur’an being gathered in the heart of the Messenger (saw). The verse before this one 75:16 gives the context.
@@Bing.chilling.1 That's the interpretation of Ibn Kathir, i'm not saying it's invalid, but i don't see it being the only valid interpretation.
By adding such brackets, essentially you are forcing an interpretation unto the reader.
I'm not totally against them, if they sometimes help by adding things lost in translation, but if they are used to force interpretations, i personally don't like it.
You may disagree, but if i was to translate the Qur'an to my language, i would like the reader to be in a similar position than if he be reading the arabic original...
If this make sense.
If a word can be translated 1 to 1, with ambiguity, i would rather preserve the ambiguity, even if i have a particular interpretation.
Hope this makes sense.
Again i'm not saying that interpretation is wrong. It's just that the text does not say that, and it's good we preserve the original meanings.
Surah Anam 90 mins? no it takes 20-25 for me
really? Its 32 pages long, and I can read 20 pages in one hour, so the 90 minutes matches up with my recitation.
Reading 32 pages in less than 30 minutes means that you are reading more than 1 page a minute, which is 1 line every four seconds. When you read this fast, it is easy to accidentally drop tajweed rules while maintaining that speed, so I recommend you to slow down your recitation a bit. Of course, if you are confident that you can read the surah with perfect tajweed, then dont let me stop you.
@@twopolaar599 You see im a hafiz so its easy plus i am the most you know give importance to tajweed out of my classmates and i try to understand so i learnt few words from arabic so i can sometimes remember the next ayah or word if i forget by understanding what the ayah it talking about. kinda like making a guess but i dont know arabic. just few words.
I’ve heard most imams recite it in around 45 to 70 minutes. 25 minutes would be way too fast
@@YT_Xmega
Im sorry if it can off condescending, but I have been in many hifz classes and have heard even huffaz reading extremely fast to the point where they dont pay any attention to tajweed at all.
Its good to know that you genuinely put importance to tajweed, unlike many others out there. Also, I have also memorized surah al an'am completely and speak arabic at a semi-fluent level alhamdulillah but, despite being confident with this surah, it still takes me > 1 hour to read it.
So, my main point was just to ask you to make sure that you prioritize tajweed over simply reading the surah, which Alhamdulillah you say you do.
Good for you . But I'm sure the Sheikh was referring to normal relax recitation with "tartil" for the majority of people.
As a
...
More from the true king....
This proves that the prophet wrote the Quran since a word sounds the same but it's spelled different
he didn't know how to write
@@bobby3814you're wrong. He knew. If he didn't know how to write, how could he confirm if the verse is well-written or not?
@@pascalmalle2240his companions wrote that, then recite that,, sry for my grammar
@@pascalmalle2240well the video literally says it? He confirmed it by hearing
@@intoxiwhasty I can tell you an ayat and write it differently. If you can't read, how can you identify the mistake?
To determine whether a message has been transmitted accurately, one must compare the received message with the original message. In the absence of the original message, the accuracy of transmission cannot be determined. Same is the case with the Quran. This exercise is not possible because we do not have access to the original Quran personally conveyed by the Prophet to his scribes. Therefore, claiming that the Quran’s transmission from the Prophet to us today in the 21st century is perfect -- is utterly baseless.
We have quranic verses and Qurans which date to the first century Hijra, and none of them differ, and the rock inscriptions and manuscripts when combined make up the full Quran
@@MostRightWingManInBritain There is no original manuscript of even a single verse that can be verified as directly dictated by the Prophet to his scribes, which would serve as the original message to compare with today's text. Assuming we possessed a first-century manuscript, all we could then assert is that the Quran we have today aligns exactly with that version from the first century which we have. As I said earlier, the accuracy of transmission of a message can only be calculated by comparing it to the original text, not to copies of it.
While what you are saying is theoretically true about needing the original in most cases (imagine I told you something, then I died and then told 5 people a modified version of what I had said), the consistency of the Qur'an manuscripts with the texts we have today along with many other factors demonstrate that the Qur'an was faithfully preserved.
You don't have to just take muslim's words for it, you can read Oriental, nonmuslim 'scholars' who doubted the traditional muslim narrative about the preservation of the Qur'an and then came around to accepting the traditional narrative after attempting and failing to breach its preservation from many angles.
As Drs. Fekry stated, we have multiple scribes who transcribed the Qur'an and there are no meaningful differences in the manuscripts. Yes, manuscripts with transcribal errors exist, but you can see that they were regarded as errors. Compare this to the preservation of literally any other historic text before the advent of printing presses and other technologies. Its no comparison.
Also, you're probably keen to ignore this, but we have oral transmission as well and a certification process. You can literally go to a lot of these reciter's houses and see a certificate with every teacher in the chain since the time of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) and if they've been authorized in that recitation mode, you will not hear a single difference.
"...Its not the eyes that are blind, rather it is the hearts in the chests that are blind" -Surah Hajj
@@stevesmith4901 Actually there are manuscripts such as the one in the University of Birmingham which is carbon dated to be between 570-640 AD and it is 100% accurate to the Quran we have now, and also Uthman's Quran from the first century Hijra is the exact same as the ones we have now in terms of the words, they're 1:1 accurate, it's dated at around 680 AD ish, so this means that the sahabians were still alive at this point in time
@@fahadsyed3861 I'm going to reiterate my earlier point, as it seems to have been overlooked.
The narrator in the video claims that the Quran we have today is exactly the same as the one dictated by the Prophet to his scribes, asserting a "PERFECT" transmission-implying 100 percent accuracy. He even provides examples to support this claim of flawless transmission.
My counter to this is simple: to assess the accuracy of a transmitted message, the original must be available for comparison. Without the original, we cannot substantiate any claims about the accuracy of transmission, perfect or otherwise. Since we don’t have the original Quran, any claim of "perfect" transmission is, therefore, unsubstantiated.
Now, for the sake of argument, let’s assume we have identical manuscripts of the Quran from a very early period of Islam. This would only indicate that these manuscripts were copied from a common source. One could then argue that if we were to find this original source manuscript, there would be a high probability it would match its copies that we possess. However, even in this scenario, the claim remains probabilistic, only verifiable in the event the source manuscript is found and can be compared to.
This is not to say that the Quran we have today cannot be traced back to the Prophet's time. The text itself provides ample evidence to locate it within that time and place of the Prophet. However, without the original, we cannot make any definitive statements about the accuracy of its transmission like the narrator does in the video.
جزاك الله خيرا