Yeah, his 41/41 was the record for 1589 days (over four years), making it the second longest held world record (Feliks's single OH record recently took the top spot).
A question, for cube attempted and solved, you only use no dnf attemps, no? Dnf attemps are problematic because you dont know the cubes attempted... but, you know that the accuracy is lower than 50%, so the final accuracy would be lower than 79%
Wait, how did you consider DNFs in the calculation of overall accuracy (the 76.97% figure)? Are the actual scores kept somewhere? Did you just ignore them?
You could just have 23% of all bits be randomized, no? It would probably produce a lot more garbage then would visually be considered 77% accuracy but thats exactly what it would be technically
Hi, cary I want to make a video similar to yours. For example, by country or by continent. I don't know how to do it with processing. If you do, let me know in the comments how to make it. I don't know how my text was translated. I've turned to Google Translator, please understand.
The bytes comparison in the beginning is misleading (even if it is correct in the information theoretic sense). The human brain doesn't work based on bits of information. Instead the common BLD method (idk if pros use it) involves memorizing sequences of letters.
It's for comparison of the amount of information memorized. Of course we don't memorize bytes, and he is studying computer science or something similar so he is familiar with bytes and bits
It's not a joke, it's a measure of the raw amount of information memorized, of course, how actually hard it is to memorize depends on the way in which you memorize, which carry knows in no way resamble actual bits, but that doesn't detract from bits as a measure of information memorized.
@@iurigrang it's pretty clear to me that he was trying to go for the some ironic contrast between the huge amount of data people expected and two regular pictures. of course memorizing how those pictures look doesn't take nearly as much memory as all those 3x3 configurations, but that's where the comedic value comes from.
Really puts in perspective how far ahead of everyone maskow was
Yeah, his 41/41 was the record for 1589 days (over four years), making it the second longest held world record (Feliks's single OH record recently took the top spot).
He got 40 points about 3 years before anyone else even got 30. Insane.
I like the weird techno Clair De Lune! Awesome video Cary!
First now you must reply
The world best multi blind solver is here
5th place is 7 years old. Just shows how amazing maskow's record is that only 4 people beat him in all this time
0:47 big F in the chat for the unnamed cuber in 10th
If you're still wondering, that was Antoine Simon-Chautemps, his name got cut off
I say it again: MBLD to a normal cuber is like what cubing is to a non-cuber
then what is mbld to a cuber?
@@idunnocubed3408 read it again
Been waiting for this one for a long time! great video :D
These animations are really smooth, this guy should start an animated series or smth like that!
3:25 Ah, there he is! Jumping straight into sixth place.
On Note 2: run an auto encoder on the image where the latent space has only 76.97% as many nodes says the input space
Amazing, how well you matched up the ebb and flow of the music with Maskow and Graham.
Marcin's 41/41 attempt in 2013 is still 5th in the world. What?
2:29 OMG HAI AINESH
otherwise, awesome video we love you cary
I didn’t notice Clair de Lune until halfway through! I really love that piece.
lol I like how the "bad" cubes in the diagram are just off by an Ra perm
I had a great time watching this
Thank you for video!
Dude i like the werid techo chair de line irs cooilo so amazing video bruh
A question, for cube attempted and solved, you only use no dnf attemps, no?
Dnf attemps are problematic because you dont know the cubes attempted... but, you know that the accuracy is lower than 50%, so the final accuracy would be lower than 79%
You should do history of 5 blind world records
Wait, how did you consider DNFs in the calculation of overall accuracy (the 76.97% figure)? Are the actual scores kept somewhere? Did you just ignore them?
Yeah, I ignored them. I actually totally forgot they were a thing until Deni commented about it!
@@cubykh lol
Brilliant
Nice video yo
You could just have 23% of all bits be randomized, no? It would probably produce a lot more garbage then would visually be considered 77% accuracy but thats exactly what it would be technically
Hi, cary I want to make a video similar to yours. For example, by country or by continent. I don't know how to do it with processing. If you do, let me know in the comments how to make it. I don't know how my text was translated. I've turned to Google Translator, please understand.
Dope
If you run out of time, are the unsolved cubes counted as unsolved, or does the score become disqualified?
Counted as unsolved
@@the1barbarian781 Ty
I love shivam bansal yo!
Nice
What does the yellow "400 B" on top mean? I'm pretty sure it's connected to 3bld but I don't know how.
400 bytes of information memorized
the amount of bytes of information the attempt was equivalent to
Marcin Kowalczyk.. what happened to him?
Garrett B moved away from cubing and more into memory sports
some people are saying that he is gone, but deep down I feel that he is still alive, watching us from afar
@@DarkMaskow sometimes we can still hear his voice
The bytes comparison in the beginning is misleading (even if it is correct in the information theoretic sense). The human brain doesn't work based on bits of information. Instead the common BLD method (idk if pros use it) involves memorizing sequences of letters.
i think everyone understands it's a joke
It's for comparison of the amount of information memorized. Of course we don't memorize bytes, and he is studying computer science or something similar so he is familiar with bytes and bits
It's not a joke, it's a measure of the raw amount of information memorized, of course, how actually hard it is to memorize depends on the way in which you memorize, which carry knows in no way resamble actual bits, but that doesn't detract from bits as a measure of information memorized.
@@iurigrang it's pretty clear to me that he was trying to go for the some ironic contrast between the huge amount of data people expected and two regular pictures. of course memorizing how those pictures look doesn't take nearly as much memory as all those 3x3 configurations, but that's where the comedic value comes from.
the guy has a 5bld mean. I think he knows
3x3 updated?!
carykh?
that one dislike is from Shivam
Im from Australia and never heard of zane lol
Come on, he is a legend!