@@AlbertVideomaker I’m using an amazon metal phone clamp, although I couldn’t find that specific one again. I’ve had plenty of time to test it with the phone attached to my helmet while snowboarding, and the phone would only fall out if I crash. But I might need to secure it better in the future haha! And, Delkin 3-suction cup system (1 + 2) to reduce vibration, mounted on the roof
@@werewalkinghere ruclips.net/video/MSOYcJ-MFVA/видео.html ,,,,, I'm currently using this and I've tested it at a high speed of 120 kmh, but I use action 4 and ace pro, I don't use iPhone because I don't find it very comfortable to do video drive with iPhone because people are surprised and it looks very big on top of the car, with a comfortable action camera and I go through customs, where filming is prohibited, so I wanted to buy action 5 pro because it has hlg hdr 220 video
@@werewalkinghere I'm currently using "PGYTECH CapLock Magnetic Camera Mount" and I've tested it at a high speed of 120 kmh, but I use action 4 and ace pro, I don't use iPhone because I don't find it very comfortable to do video drive with iPhone because people are surprised and it looks very big on top of the car, with a comfortable action camera and I go through customs, where filming is prohibited, so I wanted to buy action 5 pro because it has hlg hdr rec 220 format, but audio is very bad
@AlbertVideomaker indeed, action cameras are somewhat easier to mount (no chance of them slipping out of the holder) and way less noticeable. People stare at me all the time when I drive with this setup. But I think the quality improvement is worth it. Action cameras have their limits and aren’t great for filming things in the distance. It might change at some point but for now I guess inferior processing power and the field of view are the two main issues. Something like pocket 3 could do a better job, bigger sensor and narrower FOV. The gimbal may react badly to g forces but I’ve heard that it might be possible to address this by enabling “pov” mode where gimbal doesn’t move comparing to the handle. That would need to be tested though. For me personally I’d rather work on hiding the phone, e.g. in a roof box like ones used to carry skis. I might try filming something with the osmo action 5 again just to be sure but at this point it feels like viewers prefer iPhone footage.
@AlbertVideomaker also, when I feel lazy, the weather is suitable and I’m not driving towards the sun - I just mount the phone inside. That is 100% stealth setup, people think the phone is there for navigation and noone cares. The biggest downside is the windshield reflections.
These graphics ate getting more realistic by the day impressive
Amazing, what mount model do you have for your phone on the car?
@@AlbertVideomaker I’m using an amazon metal phone clamp, although I couldn’t find that specific one again. I’ve had plenty of time to test it with the phone attached to my helmet while snowboarding, and the phone would only fall out if I crash. But I might need to secure it better in the future haha! And, Delkin 3-suction cup system (1 + 2) to reduce vibration, mounted on the roof
@@werewalkinghere ruclips.net/video/MSOYcJ-MFVA/видео.html ,,,,, I'm currently using this and I've tested it at a high speed of 120 kmh, but I use action 4 and ace pro, I don't use iPhone because I don't find it very comfortable to do video drive with iPhone because people are surprised and it looks very big on top of the car, with a comfortable action camera and I go through customs, where filming is prohibited, so I wanted to buy action 5 pro because it has hlg hdr 220 video
@@werewalkinghere I'm currently using "PGYTECH CapLock Magnetic Camera Mount" and I've tested it at a high speed of 120 kmh, but I use action 4 and ace pro, I don't use iPhone because I don't find it very comfortable to do video drive with iPhone because people are surprised and it looks very big on top of the car, with a comfortable action camera and I go through customs, where filming is prohibited, so I wanted to buy action 5 pro because it has hlg hdr rec 220 format, but audio is very bad
@AlbertVideomaker indeed, action cameras are somewhat easier to mount (no chance of them slipping out of the holder) and way less noticeable. People stare at me all the time when I drive with this setup. But I think the quality improvement is worth it. Action cameras have their limits and aren’t great for filming things in the distance. It might change at some point but for now I guess inferior processing power and the field of view are the two main issues. Something like pocket 3 could do a better job, bigger sensor and narrower FOV. The gimbal may react badly to g forces but I’ve heard that it might be possible to address this by enabling “pov” mode where gimbal doesn’t move comparing to the handle. That would need to be tested though. For me personally I’d rather work on hiding the phone, e.g. in a roof box like ones used to carry skis. I might try filming something with the osmo action 5 again just to be sure but at this point it feels like viewers prefer iPhone footage.
@AlbertVideomaker also, when I feel lazy, the weather is suitable and I’m not driving towards the sun - I just mount the phone inside. That is 100% stealth setup, people think the phone is there for navigation and noone cares. The biggest downside is the windshield reflections.