Boris Spassky vs Bobby Fischer | World Championship Match, 1972
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 июл 2023
- Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
"Fischer King"
Spassky - Fischer World Championship Match (1972) · 0-1
#chess #chessgame #bobbyfischer #borisspassky 
Игры
Fisher the whole game played on the edge. So much tension.
Every time I think one of them had seized the momentum the other one pulls out a brilliant defensive move. What a battle of attrition!
Fischer managed to corner Spassky with pawns. They locked his king in place not just because he would put himself in check, but if he was to try and move away even one square then Fischer gets his queen back on the board and the position of the queen when restored would have led to a check mate. Incredible game. Using the weakest pieces on the board to beat him. It seems almost impossible.
He also locked at least one of Spassky's Rooks at the back row with those same pawns for a large portion of the match. After the two had traded queens, Fischer had more pawn development to keep throwing them at Spassky's back row to regain his queen and Spassky had to keep a Rook there as protection. So Spassky was essentially playing with one arm tied behind his back the whole time.
- a truly incredible game
There is an unbelievably good video on RUclips called Deep Blue in the series Down the Rabbit Hole on the channel Frederik Knudsen. About the computer that went against the best player in the world, Gerry Kasparov. The back and forth they have is fascinating and some of the greatest chess matches ever.
ruclips.net/video/HwF229U2ba8/видео.htmlsi=Q5U4Fn6ce8BT_f8R
checkmate
Nadie podrá jamás superar a Bobby.
Porque lo hizo solo, sin la ayuda de nadie.
Kasparov, karpov, carlsen y otros tuvieron ayuda de grandes entrenadores, incluso de su familia y el gobierno.
Bobby ni siquiera su familia ni el gobierno de su país le ayudó.
Llegó en taxi a jugar el campeonato del mundo contra la escuela Soviética de ajedrez.
Y les ganó a todos.
Además ha jugado el ajedrez más perfecto de todos los tiempos.
Por estas razones y otras más nadie le llega ni a los talones al gran Bobby.
El único que supera a Bobby es el ajedrez mismo.
Robert James Fischer: "EL MAS GRANDE".
Bobby ajedrecista- Leyenda, Bobby ser humano - suciedad
لذلك يعتبر من أفضل لاعبين في لعبة الشنطرنج
Pucha qué inspirado y realista eres en tus puntos d vista amigo José, t felicito por ello, yo digo exactamente lo mismo del inmortal Bobby, quien pa ser campeón mundial fue un perfecto autodidacta, pues como bien lo recalcas, nadie ni un equipo d asesores ni entrenadores, ni máquinas ni motores como ahora, ni su familia ni su propio gobierno lo apoyaron, hasta cuando partía a Reykiavik a jugar el campeonato le preguntaron Sr Fischer va Ud a jugar el campeonato? Contestó "Voy a la guerra", tenía un autoestima al 101 % a prueba d bala, decía "voy a ser campeón mundial, me lo tomo en serio", y lo fué, qué más puedo acotar, los legados d sus partidas, las variantes q llevan su nombre, sus inventos como el reloj Fischer, el Fischer random, entre tantos q por ello y mucho más, debe ser considerado como el mejor ajedrecista d todos los tiempos, xq nadie más escribió historias, creo q ni lo habrá después, d haber aplastado a sus oponentes por 6 a 0
Fischer & Spaasky. I feel like I'm in church - chess church - watching their matches.
And bravo BRAVO the music accompaniment - as beautiful as the game itself.
Yes: both men are using powerful gifts given to them by GOD - and not for a destructive purpose! Additionally, they had profound respect for each other - not just for the game. Boris had to perform for Russia - but Bobby just performed because that is what he was: a Chessman.
music if you have insomnia
Come testify brotha!!
And Boris Spassky stood up and applauded him
That was another Game. The Game where Bobby opened with 1) c4
Además Spassky era muy culto y caballero en reconocer la capacidad d sus oponentes
In history of chess there was nothing like that game. M. Botvinnik
Pa decir ello, Botvinnik también fue uno d los grandes del ajedrez
The greatest chess regret of my life is that, when conversing with Kavalek in a London hotel in 1987 I, for some mad reason, did not question him about his work with Fischer on the adjournment analysis of this the magnificent thirteenth game. For Kavalek became Fischer´s second in Rekyavik,
Short did subsequently tell me that Lubosh told him that he had taught Fischer how to play the Richter Rauzer system Vs Spassky´s Classical Sicilian, though. A line Fischer deployed in the eighteenth and twentieth games.
Had Bobby ever played Alekhine's before? Amazing to think that opening was considered playable at that level
The greatest chess regret. Never thought I'd hear someone say that
Фишер - Гений Шахматного поля
I remember a lot of people's minds exploded when Fischer changed up his openings for this match.
I've got a book on the match somewhere, the author did note that numerous Soviet grandmasters would have been going through Fischer's favourite openings. And Bobby refused to play them.
Unbelievable.What a beautiful game.A master piece
enjoy the chess without commentary, enlightening, you can see their game unfolding
My sentiments exactly. You can watch the game without all the might haves, could haves, should haves and at a speed that is comfortable to watch. Well done.
I also enjoy it more this way. It's like watching a movie without someone explaining the plot.
@@phillipadams4691
👍
Really great game. Robert Fisher was one of the greatest. This game is so amazing!!
Not one of the greatest. The greatest.
@@texasskyliner704But an odd bird. Tends to be that with outstanging ones.
Robert Fisher is the greatest chessmaster in all over the world. Bobby, you are for ver in my heart!
Nowhere near Kasparov.
Shit guy thou
Kasparov had a lot of grand master to help him first and then computers. Bobby was alone by himself
@@honkymonky7033computers helped his opponents too, so this cancels eachother out
@@tk6729Kasparov wins in terms of longevity, by far,, but Fischer's level of dominance (short-lived as it was) has never been equalled by anybody. not to mention Kasparov came from a country where chess culture flourished, he attended Botvinnik's academy (a 5 times world champion). Fischer didn't have such resources at all. he singlehandedly took on an empire.
I was 12 when I replayed that game, almost traumatized when dreaming of getting rolled over by black pawn chains while trying to push my game on the other side of the board.
51 years after, I still hold this was the greatest game of chess fought over the board in a World Championship. Clearly not free of errors, but what a fight!
12:52 0 - 1
Between 1970
-1972, no one in any era could have beaten him. He was the greatest chess player to ever live.
He defeated the Soviets all by himself, no computers, and no cheating.
Fischer beat the weakest chess world champion Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Capablanca would beat the blunder maker Spassky 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Magnus Carlsen would beat weakest Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! You can not lose 11 times against awful Spassky!
@@RaineriHakkarainen and
Mpg9788
Bobby played the man who was put before him by the Soviets. He would have played anyone.
He was not playing against the Soviets....or against Russia (or against the Soviets in Russia).
Bobby did not create the news hype - and did not like it much, either.
You are delusional, he didn't play vs Karpov.
Batalla hasta el último aliento
Музыка какая-то депрессивная... Пришлось полностью звук убрать.
Spassky was spastic he did not take the rook in the corner with his black Bishop
Fischer makes it seem so easy!
Lovely game👏
Easy? He hardly won.
@@airkuna Or you might say he deftly outmaneuvered a world champion, seeing more deeply into the positions of the game, and luring his opponent into a most unapparent trap, all the while appearing to be in trouble. But he wasn't. Unmatched mastery defies all appearances!
hes light as a Feather
😊 perhaps spassky thought that chest is like a night at the ballet when in fact it is more like a knife fight in a phone booth. He was playing chess like my 3-year-old daughter he knows how the pieces move but he was just playing dolls instead of playing smash mouth chess
Is there commentary available for this game?
11:24 Why not Spassky's Tower H1 to H8?🤦🏻
Yea instead of checking Bobby right I knew I couldn't have been the only one that spotted that 😏 Nice find I love these type of game plays it allows you to see 👀 what could've been done better in order to get ahead faster n win out the game
I don't get it. There is a black tower. Tg8×Th8. Oh! Now I get it. Indeed! He could have won.
Spassky made several mistakes,
Bobby never makes a mistake,
that is why one mistake against Bobby and you are lost.
Why he resigned??
Epic game
How difficult would it be to tell us which game this was? They played 20.
@Francisco ParraBobby Fischer LOST the first game of the 1972 WCC.
It was the thirteenth game.
@@FranciscoParra-im9pi Ouch...do you feel enlightened? 😂
Hi, this is the most incredible and easy-to-understand tutorial on chord & chord-building. THANK YOU!!!
Que partida maravilhosa!
Que nivel de juego 👏👏👏👏👏
At one point in the game is stasky had taken the damn rook in the corner he would have won by taking the rook in the corner with his black Bishop Fisher would have been forced to take the bishop with his other rook and then spassky promotes the pawn add Fisher has to take the pawn which was promoted then stasky takes the last rook of fishers and Fisher is down two rooks for a bishop and a pawn. As I said spassky was spastic
nope
Какая то хрень… почему было не взять черную ладью на Н8 белым слоном? 🤔да и вообще, какой-то венегрет
Тоже пересматривал и не понял.
H8? Rook would be gone with queen promotion
Super Spiel.
6:23 am i wrong or did Fisher just hanged the rook right there?
There was so many moves I didn’t understand.
of course
which game was this?
I'm not good at chess. Why did he resign at the end?
Just to avoid humiliation.
Do not forget: he had the KGB watching his every move, too -
better for their player to jump off the tracks immediately... at least that showed them that he was able to avoid being smashed by the train.
Which game number is this?
Why is it blacked out?
But why did he resign? Can someone please explain?
Fischer is going to take the bishop, if not he going to check the black king with his tower. And the paws will win.
Fisher was the best ever. But Spassky was a fantastic player. Just beautiful to watch and very poignant because, if not for Fisher, Spassky may be the greatest ever.
two greatest
❤
raymond reddington acknowledged it in the blacklist
"Sacrifice the bishop"
Após 41 anos ao vermos uma partida brilhante mostra q Fischer foi e ainda é o maior gênio do xadrez vivo ou morto 😂
Well I'm a novice, but why didn't Spassky play for draw?
Cuando el gran Bobby estuvo en el esplendor d su carrera no había quien lo detenga, barría con todo aquel q se le ponía al frente si es posible x marcadores d tenis d 6 a 0, desde esa época hasta ahora no existe otro jugador q haya aplastado a sus oponentes x tan humillantes scores, hoy en día la mayoría son tan miedosos q hasta juegan sólo a empatar, x eso es justo y merecido q el inmortal Bobby Fischer sea considerado como el mejor ajedrecista d todos los tiempos
Fantástica observaciónes! Gracias!
Спасский ошибся в нескольких местах
Fischer has always admitted that his "secret" was "taking advantage of his opponents mistakes."
But that does mean he had to be able to recognize mistakes as they happened....and knew how to profit from them!
Bobby was quite a character.❤
I saw blunders and missed chances on both sides. I feel chess ready to take on either player.
Я посредственный шахматист, но по-моему Спасский допустил несколько неточностей.
The name of music , please
Aymen Atef - Galctic Resonance Escapade
I don't understand why Spassky, at 11:20, did not move his rook down to the back row. While it's true that he would likely lose his last pawn, Fischer would still have trouble moving his pawns.
At 11:13 should be
Rg1 f4
Kb2 Kd4
music?
God how I wish Bobby was still around to this day. Then again, he wouldn't survive in this era with all the crap going on and such tbh, unfortunately. As he was barely able to survive back then with all the shit going on and how he was and such.
Wow, these guys are good.
@adam
😁👍Yes....
(at the very least)!😁👍
I played games with my dad who play against grand masters... I would get so bored as my dad studied the board I'd just make moves to end the game... and get out of the room.
Unglaublich was gäbe Gottes ist was dieser Spieler auf Schachbrett erkennen und sehen ist für mich unbegreiflich der liebe Gott kann wirklich alles erschaffen was er will
Seeing the story, since Spassky wons first 2 matches, how is possible 0-1? Just to undestand, which match is this? The third one?
Game 13. Put Bobby three points up.
There was no need to resigned at that position
Hey, these guys seem good. They should like play in FIDE or something
Bobby Fischer is a magician
I would say extraordinarily gifted - and CONFIDENT!!!!!
Why He resigned?
Natura, poate fi răspunsul pământului!
But why wasn't Bobby developing B pawn ?
Should be 0-1 rather than 1-0.
ME , too THINKS saMe ,,, bt VHEN PLAING ....APP NEVEL told ...HOV VHEN and vHELE MISTAKE ....?? CLCIK n ID mole IS added IF CHECKED BEFoLE.....not , MINE , LIVES ,, MCH EXPLAINNED ......HV Lobbed all cash , and make me and son LOOK good FOL nothing , JMP n ME .....ALL LIFE ME COOKED ..HIDED...........GETTING>>>LEADIEE>>F0l...1980s..ALMIEE......all.....deeds.....vith...ovn...HANDS.........
The American way is to put the winner as one first. Your hint is one won then the other lost
@@hart63The correct way is still 0-1 to show that Black won. This has always been the standard in annotations.
Hater degenerate.
100%
As I watch the game unfold , I get happy when I say to myself , ""Oh, I would move this piece here. """ and then these masters proceed to do exactly what I would of done. I was right in that my moves mirrored their moves about 70% of the time. The other 30% -- well I am not a grandmaster. My problem with chess is when I play I get point greedy , meaning I will always grab an opponents higher valued piece sacrificing my lower valued piece and by so doing throw away a good position through that greed. It seems these grand master never ever do that. They value position over mere points. They never sacrifice a lower valued piece for a higher value piece if it opens up or destroys the power positioning of the pieces on the board.
I love the comments by the "Chess Experts" here who find multiple blunders by the best two chess players of their day. If I see a blunder, I just accept that I don't see the brilliance of the move.
6:21 why dont take the Rock with Bishop?
Music is extremely distracting. Can’t concentrate on the game.
@2:46 Why didn't White Pawn to C4? Guess I'm too dumb to understand.
Bobby recordado con gran cariño en todo el mundo hubiera superado tanto a karpov como a kasparov, pero el mismo reconoció que el maestro supremo del ajedrez es el gran Morphy.
Boris vs "Bobby"?! More correct is "Boria" vs Robert
Nice game
Fischer played that game exactly as how I would have played it. I actually thought he was copying my every move!
Sin esa música se disfrutaría mejor la partida
@6:23 why doesn't white bishop take rook at h8
At 11:23 why not Rh8??
I see. Pc4-c3
12:21 why d7?
Who win?Spaasky?
plays with black very good trapping white while attacking
Datoria externă se plăteşte cu datoria internă.
Munţii sau stelele zboară.
Did he miss an early check mate chance
Zwei Weltklasse Spieler welche vom eigenen politischen System bestraft wurden
Le pion prend le fou,
Le cheval prend la Tour,
La Reine prise par le toi,
Partouououze....!
Missed opportunity by Spassky on move 25. He played Qc3 but rejected e5-e6. All the complications favour white after this move e5-e6….needs exact defence for ages. One mistake after that white wins.
Watching this as a beginner, there so many moves from Fischer that seemed illogical. It looks as if he's sacrificing his important pieces way too easily, only to realize that near the end he just overwhelmed Spassky with "mere" footsoldiers. It's almost demoralizing for a beginner, let alone for a grandmaster!
That would be to Bobby's advantage: feeling demoralized did not seem to enter into his own strategic play...he aimed for the opponents mistakes and pounced at an unexpected time!!!
I thought Fisher blundered his rook on h8 to be taken by White's Bishop for free. Did I miss something there?
Yes.
@@ulf-christof_engel So what did I miss?
At 13:02 Spaski should have move his rook to A1 and game over.
Much better if there was human commentary.
If Spassky resigned then it's not 1-0 but 0-1, as he was white in this game.
Why did Fisher take the knight when he knew he’d lose his queen? I’m a beginner player.
He takes white queen after
I am a chess novice, and people that I really admire love this game and the strategy of it, but I have a question, I guess Fisher was considered maybe the greatest all time, maybe debatable, but could he have beaten Kasparov?
Probably yes. We will never know.
Fischer couldn 't beat Kasparov . I argue that Karpov was stronger than Fischer , which is why Fischer refused to play with Karpov for fear of losing to him . Kasparov , as we know , turned out to be stronger than Karpov , according to this logic , we can assume that Kasparov is stronger than Fischer . Fischer was lucky that by the will of fate he fought for the chess crown with Boris Spassky . Boris Spassky was at that time , although a strong player , but by nature Spassky was a lazy person and did not like to overwork himself in chess !! And as we understand it , this is a big minus for a chess player , because in the fight for the world title , sometimes you need to be able to mobilize all your strength ! But Boris Spassky is not one of those players who will fight to the seventh sweat without sparing either himself or his opponent . Boris Spassky at that time was the most convenient opponent for Fischer , God rewarded Fischer with Spassky for his great efforts and aspirations in chess knowledge . I am convinced that Karpov and Kasparov were stronger than Fischer at that time , Karpov 's strength is in his extraordinary calmness no matter what , Karpov always keeps a cool head and this is his big plus ! But Kasparov is Kasparov ! At that time , Soviet chess players were very strong , I want to say again that he was very lucky that he played with Spassky ! Spassky was at that time the weakest link among Soviet chess players .
Anatoly Karpov never gets the credit he deserves. The 2 ks played 5 matches, 150 or 160 games and Kasparov won only 2 more games. Karpov is described as a boa constrictor, but in the 1960s and 1970s he was a brilliant attacker. I'm 58 in a few months so I grew up with Karpov as one of my heroes. The 2 k's played each other after the 5 world championships. They're co-equals.
@@yuriystruykin3849 You make a blanket statement, that Fisher was afraid to lose to Karpov, so he didn't play him. First you don't know that you think that, and that still doesn't say he would lose to either of them.
@@ericday4505 My dear friend, I am 100% sure that Fischer was afraid of losing to Karpov, and he was not afraid in vain ! Of course Fischer is a genius , there is no doubt about it ! But Karpov at that time was still stronger than Fischer ! The Soviet chess school was then the strongest in the world ! Fischer was a self - taught genius ! Do you know what else is very important here ? Fischer would have had to fight not just against Karpov , but he would have had to fight against the entire chess machine of the Soviet Union !!! And this is a very powerful force at that time !!! Fischer did not have such a powerful support at that time ! Behind the scenes , Karpov against Fischer would have been helped by the best Soviet chess players at that time ! Do you understand? Do you remember when Karpov won against Korchnoi , who was very , very strong at that time ? But why? But because Karpov was helped by a powerful machine called the Soviet Union !!! There was a moment when the coaches realized that Karpov was not tired much and the best resorts of the Soviet Union were at Karpov 's service , where he was able to have a good rest from chess and gain new strength to fight Korchnoi and eventually defeated him ! The machine called the Soviet Union was very clever and powerful at that time ! Something like that my dear friend )
Boa
Spassky was good too
And a better man than chess player.
@@gottadomor7438
Well...certainly more emotionally stable! But he did not like Bobby just because he is a good man - he liked Bobby because he connected with something deeply good in Bobby, too👍
Giving up his queen. Wow
Yeah .....
He knew he could make more of them 😂
Музыка ужасная, будто хоронят, зачем она вообще?
Boris messed up ☝️ somewhere in this game he most definitely could have won i guess it does take a little bit of luck in that your opponent dont see or seize the opportunity to win out the game haha
Game 13 ♟️
Any of the great games between two brilliant minded chess players would be material that you could probably study for years and still not have a comprehension for the how they played the game. But this one in particular is absolutely crazy. Boris Spassky had a higher player rating at the time of this game, at least I am pretty sure that was the case due to Spassky being more active. But there’s a cat and mouse game happening and there is a specific point in the game when Spassky was smiling and was gearing his thinking toward putting Fischer away. And all of a sudden with a combination of one or two moves the mouse became the cat and it was ready to pounce.
"Boris Spassky had a higher player rating at the time of this game"
did he? interesting.
in fact, when the 1972 WC started, Spassky was rated 2660, and Fischer - 2785.
that's a 125 points gap.
in fact, the largest EVER between #1 and #2.
for comparison, it's LARGER than the gap between the current #1 (Carlsen) and #28; on the most recent rating list.
let that sink in.
that's how dominant Fischer was.
Fischer beat the weakest chess world champion Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Capablanca would beat the blunder maker Spassky 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Magnus Carlsen would beat awful Spassky 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! You can not lose 11 times really bad Spassky! Caruana scored the highest tournament elo rating ever 3080 in St Louis 8,5/10! Fischer and Kasparov their highest tournament elo rating is 2990 only! Karpov scored 11/13 in Linares 1994 elo score 3040! Alekhine in San Remo in 1930 elo rating 3040!! Kasparov and Fischer can not be the greatest with poor 2990 tournament elo score!