Gabor Szantai When I build a high rise the credit goes to my company....Nobody else. Why? Everybody else's little part is a small piece of a massive project.. Not the architect, the interior designer, electrician, plumber or whoever else.. Getting paid is credit paid in full. My vision, leadership and sweaty balls get the job done...If it fails or something goes wrong nobody looks anywhere, but at me. I make referrals as much as is possible without cutting my own throat. I feel no different about a Photo shoot. The model, stylist...whatever...They have been paid and I owe them Nothing. I use and refer that same team as much as is possible without cutting my own throat....Like when an art director calls looking for somebody else (cheaper) and the name of the MUA from my last project...She gets nothing, but a stone wall. If I get hired and the project goes to shit...They don't come looking for the model, MUA, stylist, or whoever else....It is my ass on the line What Vogue does (with all respect) has no reference on my world....IMHO they are way outside 99% of the regular photography world. My hard earned opinion
Hello, I am former architect designer, I had changed my career after 12 years and I have been surviving as a fashion photographer for 5 years ;) In Hungary you have to credit/list every designer, engineer who are involved when you submit your project to the council. We always listed the head architect, floor planners, 3D designers, structural engineer, etc. Designing is not the same as executing a fashion story. When you are shooting you have a team, all of them are irreplaceable persons who are helping you to achieve your goal. They, you are equal: if the stylist make a mistake you suffer, if the set designer creates a wonder, you will be thanked. This is why the leading magazines credit everyone involved, good photographers - Alexi Lubomirski, Peter Lindbergh - always credit their people on social media. When you are designing a structure your work is not depending on a bricklayer, a carpenter or a plumber. But we always thanked our subcontractors, their company were advertised on the construction sites. Showing respect is free, couple of characters, does not hurt anyone.
@@Smokin07ram That's right. If other people want to credit the MUA, caterer, janitor, studio owner, wardrobe, then that's their business. Telling everyone "thank you" at the end of a shoot is enough when they're getting paid. People don't need to be credited for doing their job. Unfortunately the movie industry has caved to the ridiculous, crediting grips, the person who brought sandwiches to the set, the person who swept the floor the night before the shoot, the sun, the moon, the stars, the sidewalk that was walked on enroute to the studio. It's ridiculous. Want credit? Then go and create something that revolves around your design, your vision, your investment, your having to pay banks back if you fail, etc. . otherwise people need to be quiet.
They don't call it full frame, they call it full frame medium format. Every camera maker tries to set its products apart and they want to do it by letting people know their top range of backs has a true 645 sensor. Personally I think there should be a new term for sensor size in between full frame and 645. 645 is really the smallest you can get in medium format traditionally. Maybe with digital they should call 645 large format and anything in between FF and 645 medium format, since those cameras perform the same function as film medium format cameras, being a bit more portable and easier to use than large format while still offering better image quality than FF.
> "... they call it full frame medium format.". They would probably be better off calling it "full medium frame format", or more simply "medium format". It's two and a half times larger than the 135 format. According to Wikipedia (and elsewhere) the "Medium Format" is larger than 35mm *Film* (36mm × 24mm) (also called 135 Film) and smaller than the "Large Format" (at least 4" × 5") *Film* (also called 120 Film) (the 6 × 4.5 Medium Format is 56mm × 41.5mm) - since this Sensor is 53.7mm x 40.4mm it's bigger than "Full Frame", but not quite 6 × 4.5 which is the smallest Medium *Film*. You'd need a 55mm Lens to have a 35mm equivalent using this Sensor, whereas and APS-C could use a 23mm Lens to get a 35mm equivalent. That's part of what's involved with Medium Format, more expensive Lenses. The 'Digital Adoption' (interpretation) of "Medium Format Film" has been to provide a large number of color accurate large Pixels with a large Dynamic Range. With today's technology a Full Frame Sensor _can_ compete directly with Medium Format Sensors in *every* way, just not in *_all_* ways simultaneously; you'll either be giving up "large Pixels" *or* a "large number of Pixels", since IF you had enough of both the Sensor would be larger than Full Frame. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR . Large Frame Sensors are rare, but there are a handful available for Astrophotography. Chances of large format catching on is not good with astronomical pricing being the norm.
+MrPanohead that's not what I meant, it's about what they said about if you don't have a medium format.... your Not a badass photographer... I mean I've seen medium and sinar format photographer and their works simply suck... it's not only about the gear, it's a about knowledge.
I simply can't believe they should have said that. Of course it's not only about the gear, the gear is a tool that will help fullfill your visions as a photographer. Medium format is not for everyone, if you shoot fast sport it would be stupid to stand with a medium format camera, it's not what they are built for. That said of course they are saying nice things about medium format also compared to fullframe dslr, it's what they are selling it would be stupid to do anything else :-)
I'm not completely sure which one it was I believe it was the M18 but could also just have been the M8. I did not initially plan on using the joker bug so I can't remember but the 800 or 400.
I love this video so much, I keep dreaming of a day that I can have my go with a model like that and lighting, amazing Jonas such an inspiration
Why not credit the rest of the photoshoot team as well? Model, make-up, hair?
Did you think this was a TFP shoot?
I don't credit people that get paid
Being credited is not a payment: it's all about showing respect towards your team. Even Vogue credits MUA and Hairstylist after paid work.
Gabor Szantai
When I build a high rise the credit goes to my company....Nobody else. Why? Everybody else's little part is a small piece of a massive project..
Not the architect, the interior designer, electrician, plumber or whoever else.. Getting paid is credit paid in full.
My vision, leadership and sweaty balls get the job done...If it fails or something goes wrong nobody looks anywhere, but at me.
I make referrals as much as is possible without cutting my own throat.
I feel no different about a Photo shoot. The model, stylist...whatever...They have been paid and I owe them Nothing. I use and refer that same team as much as is possible without cutting my own throat....Like when an art director calls looking for somebody else (cheaper) and the name of the MUA from my last project...She gets nothing, but a stone wall.
If I get hired and the project goes to shit...They don't come looking for the model, MUA, stylist, or whoever else....It is my ass on the line
What Vogue does (with all respect) has no reference on my world....IMHO they are way outside 99% of the regular photography world.
My hard earned opinion
Hello, I am former architect designer, I had changed my career after 12 years and I have been surviving as a fashion photographer for 5 years ;)
In Hungary you have to credit/list every designer, engineer who are involved when you submit your project to the council. We always listed the head architect, floor planners, 3D designers, structural engineer, etc.
Designing is not the same as executing a fashion story. When you are shooting you have a team, all of them are irreplaceable persons who are helping you to achieve your goal. They, you are equal: if the stylist make a mistake you suffer, if the set designer creates a wonder, you will be thanked.
This is why the leading magazines credit everyone involved, good photographers - Alexi Lubomirski, Peter Lindbergh - always credit their people on social media.
When you are designing a structure your work is not depending on a bricklayer, a carpenter or a plumber.
But we always thanked our subcontractors, their company were advertised on the construction sites.
Showing respect is free, couple of characters, does not hurt anyone.
@@Smokin07ram That's right. If other people want to credit the MUA, caterer, janitor, studio owner, wardrobe, then that's their business. Telling everyone "thank you" at the end of a shoot is enough when they're getting paid. People don't need to be credited for doing their job. Unfortunately the movie industry has caved to the ridiculous, crediting grips, the person who brought sandwiches to the set, the person who swept the floor the night before the shoot, the sun, the moon, the stars, the sidewalk that was walked on enroute to the studio. It's ridiculous. Want credit? Then go and create something that revolves around your design, your vision, your investment, your having to pay banks back if you fail, etc. . otherwise people need to be quiet.
this is the best kamera
I love phase one, but somehow I think that they don't really know the difference between Full Frame and Medium Format :D
They don't call it full frame, they call it full frame medium format. Every camera maker tries to set its products apart and they want to do it by letting people know their top range of backs has a true 645 sensor. Personally I think there should be a new term for sensor size in between full frame and 645. 645 is really the smallest you can get in medium format traditionally. Maybe with digital they should call 645 large format and anything in between FF and 645 medium format, since those cameras perform the same function as film medium format cameras, being a bit more portable and easier to use than large format while still offering better image quality than FF.
> "... they call it full frame medium format.".
They would probably be better off calling it "full medium frame format", or more simply "medium format". It's two and a half times larger than the 135 format.
According to Wikipedia (and elsewhere) the "Medium Format" is larger than 35mm *Film* (36mm × 24mm) (also called 135 Film) and smaller than the "Large Format" (at least 4" × 5") *Film* (also called 120 Film) (the 6 × 4.5 Medium Format is 56mm × 41.5mm) - since this Sensor is 53.7mm x 40.4mm it's bigger than "Full Frame", but not quite 6 × 4.5 which is the smallest Medium *Film*.
You'd need a 55mm Lens to have a 35mm equivalent using this Sensor, whereas and APS-C could use a 23mm Lens to get a 35mm equivalent. That's part of what's involved with Medium Format, more expensive Lenses.
The 'Digital Adoption' (interpretation) of "Medium Format Film" has been to provide a large number of color accurate large Pixels with a large Dynamic Range.
With today's technology a Full Frame Sensor _can_ compete directly with Medium Format Sensors in *every* way, just not in *_all_* ways simultaneously; you'll either be giving up "large Pixels" *or* a "large number of Pixels", since IF you had enough of both the Sensor would be larger than Full Frame.
Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR .
Large Frame Sensors are rare, but there are a handful available for Astrophotography. Chances of large format catching on is not good with astronomical pricing being the norm.
+MrPanohead
that's not what I meant, it's about what they said about if you don't have a medium format.... your Not a badass photographer... I mean I've seen medium and sinar format photographer and their works simply suck... it's not only about the gear, it's a about knowledge.
I simply can't believe they should have said that. Of course it's not only about the gear, the gear is a tool that will help fullfill your visions as a photographer. Medium format is not for everyone, if you shoot fast sport it would be stupid to stand with a medium format camera, it's not what they are built for. That said of course they are saying nice things about medium format also compared to fullframe dslr, it's what they are selling it would be stupid to do anything else :-)
I'm not completely sure which one it was I believe it was the M18 but could also just have been the M8. I did not initially plan on using the joker bug so I can't remember but the 800 or 400.
yeah well id love to be able to afford medium format. but i can. so i guess ill never make it. its my dream. and its out of reach
kamera terbaik dgn resolusi terbesar di dunis