Just a reminder that I JUST LAUNCHED a brand new art channel! Go subscribe, and help me name and built it into the perfect art channel!! ruclips.net/channel/UC3BCGz72VQcFdoBiZtKfOpg
While a Remora-Revolver evolving into an Octopus-Tank makes more sense thematically, same goes with the instrument theme of the Pikipek line, I do feel the Sobble line could've leant more into the spy stuff.
@@adellongino9413 just physical examples - because thats what the videos about - and that's all I'm talking about here, not lore wise Dragonair / Dragonite Clampearl / Gorebyss - Huntail Gloom / blossom Snorunt / frosslass - Glalie Etc
There was an AI technique published this year (I believe by Google) that could generate 3D models from a text prompt. That may be perfect for 3d printing.
@@TheCatMurgatroyd that's true. On the other hand I did just yesterday use DALL-E 2 to generate a heightmap of a simple hilly landscape as the background for another 3d model. So I basically have an AI generated landscape. I also used DALL-E to generate textures for other parts of that model. So you can definitely already do some things related to 3d modelling with current (semi-)public AIs.
I was watching you develop those adorable grass starters, and it just ate away at me, so I gave them stats to turn them into something you would see in a Pokémon game. I am floored at how believable they turned out to be. So, here you go: the Pocotta evolution line. Pocotta, the Vase Pokémon. Type: Grass and Rock. Size: 1' 7" 26 lbs. Egg group: Grass and Mineral. Evolves at level 19. Exp yield: 102. Catch rate: 45 or 11.9%. Leveling rate: Medium slow. EV yield: 1 defense. Gender: 87.5 Male to 12.5 Female. Shiny color: White and blue. Abilities: Overgrow (Boosts Grass attacks if low hp) and Clay Barrier (Greatly reduces the power of physical attacks but doubles Fighting weakness). Stats: 60 HP, 60 Attack, 65 Defense, 45 Special Attack, 50 Special Defense, 20 Speed. Total of 300. Pocotta is an unusually friendly species of Pokemon that is rarely seen but is rumored to adorn the homes of the rich. Any plant grown inside of it will never suffer from poor soil as the cells of the Pokémon itself, when shed, act as fertilizer for the soil. Barely moving, it prefers to lounge all day and snooze but will actively yap at it's owner. In battle, it uses mainly defensive moves and will never lose hope. Plagro, the Mobile Pokémon. Type: Grass and Rock. Size: 5' 2" 47 lbs. Egg group: Grass and Mineral. Evolves at level 33. Exp yield: 159. Catch rate: 45 or 11.9%. Leveling rate: Medium slow. EV yield: 2 defenses. Gender: 87.5 Male to 12.5 Female. Shiny color: White and red. Abilities: Overgrow (Boosts Grass attacks if low hp) and Clay Barrier (Greatly reduces the power of physical attacks but doubles Fighting weakness). Stats: 70 HP, 60 Attack, 85 Defense, 50 Special Attack, 80 Special Defense, 70 Speed. Total of 415. Plagro are highly active Pokémon that have huge caring hearts. Able to hear the cries of another Pokémon from miles away through their roots in the ground, they will not hesitate to uproot themselves to run as fast as they can to see if there is anything wrong. When they aren't running around, they are usually seen in gardens tending to plants. Themselves being plants, they know the exact needs of any plant in the world and are experts of gardening. Their only downfall is being unable to communicate directly with humans, so pairing them with other Pokémon capable of speech with other Pokémon and humans such as Chatot is ideal. Viant, the Towering Pokémon. Type: Grass and Rock. Size: 17' 4" 891 lbs. Egg group: Grass and Mineral. Exp yield: 251. Catch rate: 3 or 1.6%. Leveling rate: Medium Slow to Slow. EV yield: 2 Defenses and 1 Speed. Gender: 87.5 Male to 12.5 Female. Shiny color: White red and gold. Abilities: Overgrow (Boosts Grass attacks if low hp) and Stone Tree (Increases Defense in Sandstorm and Sunlight by 1 stage every turn). Stats: 90 HP, 80 Attack, 120 Defense, 65 Special Attack, 80 Special Defense, 100 Speed. Total of 535. Viant, also known as the Viridian Giant, are masters of creation, seen sleeping in ancient flowerbeds of past civilizations with growing plants that have been rumored to be extinct. Apparently, they can use any trace amount of plant in the soil around their roots and graft them onto their flesh, changing the plants growing on their bodies. Some have been seen growing crops, others with hedges, and a few have been rumored to be buried in the earth with entire forests sprouting from themselves. The main difference between male and female Viant are the shapes of the darker patches on the ears and the leaves above the tail: males will have jagged leaflike shapes while females will have heart shapes. The insanely flexible hard outer flesh has been compared to ceramic pottery found in modern times, but to a much less brittle structure. This allows a Viant to gallop freely and with incredible speed. A motivated Viant can move for hours at a time full speed nonstop if it means it can satisfy those closest to it. However, if it senses something behind it is trying to remove its plants from itself, it will kick with its feet so hard that it could shatter the thickest of bones. Viant also has access to a unique move: Potted Pummel. A physical contact Rock attack with 140 base power, 85 accuracy, and 5 PP. Every time Viant uses this attack, it will have a much higher chance for critical hits, equivalent to using Focus Energy with Super Luck. However, this comes at a price: not only does it have a chance to miss, but every successful hit will lower Viant's Defense by 1 stage. "The user will glare at the target then leap into the air and land feet first onto their opponent's head, kicking wildly until its feet start to crack." Yes this took ages but I'm happy with this. If Jazza sees this, I hope he would be impressed. I feel like these guys could be real, and at the same time balanced as well.
I really enjoyed reading through your describtions! You did a great job and it really feels like they would be a solid addition for the next generation! I would totally have one of them in my team (:
@@kariosa_ recreating a style from given examples is an active area of research and already a supported feature in some AIs. Training a whole AI like DALL-E on just Jazz's art won't work because that requires millions of images. But synthesising his style might only require one or up to 10000. So that may be feasible in the near future (if it doesn't already exist). If you haven't already, I may try out asking DALL-E 2 for an artwork in Jazzas style... Maybe it already knows him.
@@maythesciencebewithyou and they are getting better at an alarming pace. the first version of DALL-E was much worse than DALL-E 2 and is not much older. And from what I have seen so far, progress is only getting faster, especially with the popularity of DALL-E 2, midjourney and Stable Diffusion.
@@sebastianjost Not to mention with other types of AI like ChatGPT 3, which can create entire fantasy settings (I had it make an encyclopedia by having it make a setting, then making a table of contents for the various things in that setting as if it were for a book, then asking it to write specific pages from the table of contents), stories, and code/do complex math for you.
@@discord4039 I had it make up a new language. It even used the made up vocabulary to make cohesive sentences. To be fair though, it seemed to be based on English grammar rules. It essentially replaced every word, prefix, suffix, etc with its own word. However, the sounds it used was consistent with most words, so it wasn’t totally random. I gave it entire prompts and asked it to give the answer in the language, and then translate it into English, and it worked. I even checked words and it was all consistent.
@@antivireimagine in the far future someone adopts an ai generated language only for them and a large community who liked the language became isolated, like there was an apocalypse and they had to restart humanity. The language they use was originally created by a machine and their children will never know
That feel when he's basically asking for buizel(minus the water legs) but he doesn't know pokemon enough to know who buizel is. The first looked a lot like him!
I am not anti-ai, but as an aspiring artist myself I can’t help but worry what it means for the industry I hope to join. I think most people think that ai will take away jobs from artists, and I’m kinda worried about that too. At the same time though, I know that an ai will never to be able to create the same art that I will create, which gives my art some sort of value.
I totally get it. If Jazza is any example though, it seems that the path moving forward is for artists to USE ai as a tool to speed their art. Kinda like in other industries, I think that artists who work with technology will out-compete artists who don’t.
@@emperor8716 Let's be real, it can't duplicate specific styles. It also doesn't result in lightfast physical works. It's going to revolutionize fap material, sure. Actual art, not so much.
Its a valid concern. Not only does AI has an infinite amount of references from other artists' copyrighted material, but it also saves the most used prompts and the most shared images to know exactly what the general public likes. In the near future it will be able to auto prompt images the user will love, and video AI from a small set of images is already a reality. Imagine a full animation rendered by a AI, which already knows the prompts you love and automatically makes it for you. I'd say we wil be there in less than 5 years
I'm not anti-AI, but it definitely makes me nervous. Like you mentioned, people will no longer need to pay for commissioned art, and that is how nearly every artist I know broke in to the professional side of art. Without taking commissions, it will be MUCH harder for artists (myself included) to build a name for themselves, or to kickstart a career.
@@Lilhiphop That "human touch" or "human soul" is simply not a real thing. Its massive cope to say that human art will always be better than ai art which is just simply not true especially with how good ai art has got in the past couple of months. Everyone who is a artist should be reasonably scared, BUT it is progress and you cant stop it. Just like the internet and phones.
@@changedcj007 I think there is something to be said for an artists story. People can write a story for an AI and give it stylistic cues, but at the end of the day an AI doesn't have a human life behind it, and I think the human experience and process of creativity is one of the things that make art so impressive. I can see artists who use AI as their main tool for creating artwork, we already see many artists who use photoshop and the like who didn't used to be considered 'real artists', so I can imagine a future where artists exist who are renowned for creating art through AI, but I don't see AI taking the same role as artists by themselves. I do see a future where AI artists take a lot of corporate jobs and 'marketable artwork' positions, but I think there will always be a market for human artwork (although perhaps more niche), made by individuals with stories, and that nearly any medium can survive through technological changes.
Similarly, I view AI image generators with a sense of ... ambivalence. Are they a neat little thing to tool around with? Yes, you simply cannot deny that. Is designing a quality prompt an actual skill? Yes. BUT... First, depending on the specific generator you might use, the limitations can become apparent quickly. AI struggles generally when fine details are involved, it struggles with poses and compositions, the sorts of things which a human artist would get right on the first pass. Not all generators support in/out-painting features, meaning sometimes the best you can hope for is to recycle the same RNG seed while continuing to engineer the prompt. Second, the economic fear of AI being used to supplant paid human art is REAL. On the timeless spectrum of "quality vs quantity" AI clearly leans into the "quantity" end, and so too does large-scale corporate culture. Jobs that are lost to technology don't come back, at least as long as that technology is still being employed (pun intended). And I've taken a few dives myself down the iceberg of prompting an AI generator here and there.
The big kicker with ai artwork is that you can't opt out of having your art used to train it, and if a big corporation wants your style and can use ai to get it, then that's what they're going to use instead of paying you.
I didn't even think of that, Imagine just like when they navigated copyright and dvd burning, I imagine they still would get creative to protect their money, Hollywood solved an impossible issue and even with people never stopping dvd ripping, they still secured their money by changing the way they distributed and peoples mentality changed with it. It was really something to see, they did the same with Mp3 Copies, solving the issue mostly with services like spotify, for A.i art - they might block the name you can input OR.. They might even use NFT's Incorporate some way to Lock an art style so that it cant be accessed so easily. People will come up with ways to protect their money pretty quickly.
@@OfTheiAm it's artists who are *individuals* being exploited here. Our artwork has already been scraped, and there is no way to get it out of AI databases. There is no way to protect our works at this moment and there won't be until we get laws regulating AIs, which is hard to make happen. In the meantime, corporations *are* going to profit off our stolen work. They have no interest in changing public perception to "AI art = stolen, bad" because they now don't have to pay someone for what they want.
the ai just takes other people's art and compiles it into something "new". oftentimes against the artist's wishes of their art not being stolen and/or redistributed. it's not art, its borderline stealing and is taking jobs from actual artists who care about their craft enough not to use these shady ai sites.
the backgrounds these AI can come up with are so good I think it makes a lot of sense that many people will draw their main subject and then fill in a background with AI. I'm curious if you could use it to quickly get a base design for a character and then draw in the details you had in mind that the AI either missinterprettued or ignored.
I see AI Art as an two sided sword. It is an wonderful tool and the power it has is phenomenal. It blow my mind as I saw this. I'm a little worried that some firms are shifting they work. Instead an Artist, you have an AI Prompt Employee. So you write the perfect sentence and look for the photo until you find a match. At least for me it's not fulfilling work.
Jazza, I like to edit/Photoshop pictures for fun. I love your persistence when trying to get what you want when looking for a picture to use. When I edit I always try and have the mindset of getting exactly what I want onto the picture. It is like solving a problem, using all the tools from photoshop to get what I want. All that to say, keep up the good work, loved this video.
You have to admit: this could be disastrous for the freelancer. You just said it "I could have commissioned this for hundreds of dollars." Obviously, in this setting and context, it's not the case, but that's potentially hundreds of dollars that are not going to a freelance artist. Artists are now possibly facing a crisis similar to what's killed previous trades of the past: a much cheaper and more efficient alternative
It truly is a possibility, but, I don't see it going away forever and I see AI artists becoming a real thing as well which could open up a new door in the industry as most people who require art won't be doing it themselves at the very least. Maybe in the far future full fledged AI will just take commands but we arn't there yet lol
I also have started using this myself to formulate templates and ideas, etc for my own works using things I'd never thought to before or even just when I'm stuck
@@dognbundad open doors? That's dumb. The joy of art is making it yourself with sensations and references that you yourself feel and subconsciously process to make an idea. Take that away and it would be a dead-end job. Efficiency doesn't mean it's fulfilling, please reconsider such stances. We can't let "if we can" dictate us, it always be "if we should" first. Good artists will stay, 80% will be go away. Art being made by hand won't go, but do note what happened to the craftsman who've dedicated their lives on their craft, only for factories to appear... we're only opening doors to people who don't spend years on the craft, do you seriously think such an invention should even exist, LIKE ART OF ALL THINGS? I understand machinery and physical products. But this is just insanity that we need to effectively make the idea of concepts and art to be made be efficient? How dystopian and stupid, the abstract thought of art, bound by not physical sensation but the imagination of it in paper. Meaning there aren't even any + to the common folk, we won't get to eat more nor have nicer comforts of living... just an endless stream of imaginations of reality, i must not be the only one who sees this. Laws should be there to protect us like music artists, but we get distraught instead
Technology does that a lot lol. No one here probably remembers, but a LOT of people used to be employed for their handwriting ability. It's sad but it's not technology's fault, it's capitalism creating the issue.
I found that for making Pokémon, out of Stable, Dall-E 2, and Nokemon, Stable was the best, Nokemon was really good, and Dall-E 2, was pretty good. Nokemon was especially interesting because I could input types instead of text, however, must of the designs look really weird so some people would probably not like it nearly as much as the others. Dall-E 2 consistently made mons that made sense but also looked like Pikachu but that may have been because I used the word Pokémon in the prompt. Lastly I've used Stable the most so I've become pretty accustomed to what it can and can't understand so it made the best for me. P.S. I used the website NightCafe for access to Dall-E 2 and stable and so I didn't have to input the style they have preset styles if you prefer that but it's not necessary.
Instead of learning to use the available abundant resources you all choose to be whiny bishes... Your art is mediocre by default and you should be ashamed.
AI art is really cool and it's so interesting to experiment with, but the fact that you even said in the video that A.I. could be an alternative to commissioning artists is exactly why A.I. art may not be the best path to go down. People who take commissions are already surviving on a freelance income which isn't very reliable and there are already so many people out there complaining that they have to pay for art at all. This could destroy a freelance artist's livelihood. Second, say people start faking the fact that they are an artist using A.I. art and people find out, those people would ruin any trust that people had in the art community and make finding willing commissioners even harder. I mean, AI art is cool and interesting, yet it is also dangerous and you as an artist can surely understand that some people who rely on commissions for income may feel uneasy about this. That being said, this video was great, again AI is really intersting. I don't think that anyone's feelings of uneasiness are invalid just because it's cool though
Jazza doesn't care. He already has his money-making schtick, so what does it matter if it hurts smaller artists? He'll just continue to use it to make videos to make himself even more money.
I feel that makes a rather large assumption that this will remain free, and or inexpensive. I think as the technology improves, and by extension the processing power required that these things will no longer be a "cheap alternative" to commissioning an art piece. Look at AI writing tools for example, those started off relatively affordable or even free, but that has been shifting as those become more advanced, there are free and open source versions out there that you can use your own hardware to run (but it's very taxing on your system if you try to use a model that is beyond basic) or you start having to fork over more and more money for better stronger models. I'm not saying your fear is unwarranted, it scares me too. Just a random competing thought of sorts I suppose.
@@demikus I agree with you. This is just like any tool that requires its own investment to get results from. Even that can be commissioned in the future, the value of effort and time always remains.
@@demikus That's actually a really good point. The only thing I would say to argue that is that art relies more on specific patrons than writing does, because once a writer publishes a book, pretty much the whole world is it's audience. With commissioned art peices, it's usually one person who commissions these artist and since they are custom they tend to be expensive as the quality increases. If people who have the money to buy quality art stop, then artist will have to lower their prices to a wage that they may not be able to live on because the only costumers they have are the people who can't afford AI. Now I don't think my argument is particularly strong because it disregards the varying prices in freelance work and the value of AI over custom art is if it isn't cheaper. Because essentially the only advantage of AI over commissioned is the fact that it is cheaper. The problem however is that in the present it is cheaper and if it stays cheap for much longer, some careers and some dreams could be annihalated. Here's hoping AI art will become more expensive for public use as you have predicted though.
The current way AI functions depends on existing art. The whole thing feels a little like more of the same: artists create and innovate, and their work gets reworked (won't quite say stolen...) for someone else's benefit. Obviously not the same straight up fraud we saw in your Fiver commissions, but the world's artists taught AI how to art, and I imagine few received anything back for it. The technology is gorgeous and amazing. I agree it produces both humor and inspiration. I agree there will always be a place for artists, because many artist are artists for their own souls and AI can't replace an artist's soul. It's still discouraging. But novel things often are.
I agree with most comments I saw about the AI. It's fascinating, yet devastating. I am an artist who already struggle to make a living out of my art and when I first saw that these AIs existed, I was super scared. What does it mean for the future of artists? Devaluation, minimizing our value and worth, going for AI instead of artists, scamming people using AIs and devaluing the profession with doing so are all real concerns and we are going there. I just hope it won't take too much space in the community...
This is participation trophies all over again. 🙄 Smh. Art comes from within the artist, not a robot. 🤖 This is just another way to do away with us who truly have God given talent and skill that we've busted our butts honing for years and years and years. 😤 I believe if you want to learn art and really want to appreciate what goes into honing the craft, you need to do it the old fashion way and learn to love what you do like real artists do. Ai was designed to supplant us. Seeing what you, I, and other true artists can do with our hands, pencils, and brushes inspires people! Machines replace people and destroy lives and bury true talent.
@@johnglow7845 yep. I think digital art will soon become extremely difficult to make money with. Stinks because I haven’t painted or drawn with traditional materials in years, but looks like I gotta stop using the Wacom and go back to paint or something. This tech sucks.
@@pagreg888 To me? mnh I'd say both kinda? I don't like the idea of AI art and I'm not a fan of capitalism either. Weither we like it or not, AI art will be subject to capitalism in a way or another. We can't really separate AI art from capitalism, because of that. If you don't like capitalism, you won't like what comes with AI art. =/ I think so anyway.
You should’ve used OpenAI’s Playground text generator to come up with the names too. EDIT: describing your Pokémon, I tried it and got Pottle, Willywort and Vinegaroon. Oh, you should use the text generator to come up with the art prompts for a new video.
quite honestly, i think the way you did it worked really well where you used AI to get a base idea, then used your own artistic skills to build on top of that. This could easily just also be a tool to help an artist in a rut that just doesn't know where to start a project. A blend of AI and Reality this way I feel is great. Now...imagine if this could be done for VR/AR and combined with a program like Tilt Brush? I wonder how that would workout.
I mean, maybe you'd get less angry people if you didn't deliberately point out that this would have killed a few commissions. I know this is happening, and we have to accept it, but that doesn't mean I have to _celebrate_ it. I'm sure you personally will never lose a job because of AI art, which is why it's so easy for you to be so happy with it, but the smaller artists will suffer a lot from this, and I find it really hard to get enthusiastic about it.
By the way, if you want to try this out then prepare to either wait for a really long time or spend a bunch of money, because you need credits in order to use the AI. You get 50 free credits when you start and 15 credits after every month. I haven't gotten the results I wanted because I thought it was all free, and I don't plan on buying credits any time soon, but I think I have several images for reference anyway.
Actually kind of like what Jazza ended up with his potted plant Pokémon, looks very cute and can see it fitting in the world. Can imagine the first two forms being found in gardens and green houses, posing as regular plants sitting on desks and hanging from archways. Can see the third being out on mansion grounds hiding among various foliagecovered sculptures and hedges, staying completely still, surprising unsuspecting trainers wandering too close thinking it a mere work of art. As for evolving, can see the first time being at a certain level, with the second time requiring a sun stone or something. So yeah, wouldn’t mind seeing this thing in the game, would definitely catch it.
I think the AI art is cool, I figure it'll be used for the type of art you buy at a chain store. I think there will always be a place for artists, especially when people want something that's truly one of a kind
"There will always be a space for artist" What space will that be? And how small will that space become? Will that space still feel rewarding? Still provide that spark of joy from showing someone an image you've created? Or will artist just become factory workers, pumping out pieces to feed into AI. AI is a Genie gorged on stolen work that non artist are all too happy to embrace, because it gets them what they want without any of the downsides. I think it is the duty of those artist with a voice to defend against this AI incursion, and not to down play it's very real impact. It is already crowding out artist in the commission and design field. You yourself used it to not have to pay a concept artist. Will it take someone making an AI art channel named Jazzai before you realize the dangers?
Idk if ur new o didn’t r fully pay attention what he say at the end. He realize the danger and the downside, but he also view as a helpful tool to help artist to get a inspiration or reference on what to draw next. This isn’t replacing artist, the only danger is the scammer who stole art when someone pay them. Not AI. He using this tool to have fun. Which jazza show in one of a video where he pay a certain amount of money aka 1k$ to a paid artist, and what he got a stolen art and a badly photoshop imagine that is from google. That is bringing a bad light to other paid artist who actually do art. Not a AI who create art out of image that is online. And many artist don’t mind it and they are inspire from the art that ai created. It same as how artist get inspired from others artists art.
Hey jazza, I've been watching since you first 3d pen videos and I was very young. I'm now turning 17 in two weeks and I wanna say I really love your content. Keep it up❤️
13:52 You *just* explained why so many struggling artists are afraid/sad about these AI art programs... Greedy companies everywhere will replace all art jobs with this AI as soon as they are able to.
AI art will replace a big chunk of the clip art/stock image usage and also a considerable chunk of the market for professional illustrators. It will also be used as a tool for professional illustrators to reduce the time spent (and thereby the cost) creating art and the illustrator will use both text prompts and draw graphic prompts, and then retouch the AI produced images to fit the requirement better. There will be produced vastly more images specifically for one purpose, and by using AI combined with skills to adjust and fix the images, illustrators will still have quite a bit of work. AI will be integrated into art programs like Photoshop, both with text prompts, image prompts and as magic brushes/filters. I think that is a fairly short term prediction, and I don't think it is a wild prediction. How it will change longterm is harder to say, but it is obvious that AI art will also enter the video market.
Sorry, but you can’t work with AI. The tools and interface will improve rapidly and require no expertise, touch ups, hand corrections, or artistic vision to use. The only way to survive is to eschew AI completely and make physical products using paint and paper.
These came out really cool! I'm a bit torn on the ai art subject. On one hand it's insanely cool what you can achieve and I think personally I might end up using it for inspiration or trying out compositions for my own artworks but on the other hand I feel like it might end up watering down the art community and degrade the worth of original art even more. What I mean by that is that in general people don't appreciate og art already when it comes to actually paying for a commission etc and with these tools you just need a few prompts and basically no money or effort. I also see a big problem coming up with scammers pretending they actually painted an ai piece themselves.
same here, its a great resource for those who cant draw but i cant help but wonder if this will further open the door to exploiting artists and making it harder to actually survive off of art at all personally, its hard to know what to say when i know that it wont be used just by the people who need it to express their own creativity, it will be used by big corporations & scammers alike, even if people genuinely want to support creatives & artists and want more genuine things. . . whose to say they'll be able to tell the difference between AI vs actual creatives & artists in the first place?
This art is neat but I fear it'll deter the actual artist who draws from ever trying to improve. Instead just type things out and boom the computer does it for you.
I actually think it'll do quite the opposite, every artist gas there own style and whole good programs like darle can't copy the uniqueness of a individuals art, in fact I believe Darley will allow artist to thrive more in looking for references for ideas they have but don't know quite the look for. But hey that's just me
A real artist wants to draw though. It's just people who don't want to make the effort to learn art who make ai generations. Real artists are using ai to generate ideas. Not to replace their work.
the thing that botheres me is people putting these in folios for professional jobs without able to show the process of actually designing something from scratch. Many studios & Courses however luckily DO only hire you based on your process and not your final work - but there are many companies that don't make those checks and when they ask you how you came up with their company logo and want you to talk you through it, these people will have zero idea and will make those companies either think twice hiring another designer or black list the person as someone who cannot operate professionally (which isn't a great thing if you're starting your art career.) there are artists who do use AI and fully detail their process and that might be the better way to go. AI art isn't making you an Artist, it's making you an Art Director and the difference between a good AD and a bad AD is the process and knowledge on what they're doing. there's far too many bad Art Directors out there unfortunately.
I like how everyone in the comments is in denial, trying to convince themselves that AI can’t take their jobs. I used to think AI could never be good enough to do that, but after seeing this, yeah no we’re done for. AI can do a better job than most of us, and most people don’t care about it being “human” when buying art, they just want it to look good. In fact, I just found out people called “prompt engineers” have been popping up, they’re professional prompt writers who are good at finding the best AI art for people, and they obviously work much faster than actual artists. Now tell me who you think customers would go to 😂
The takeaway I get from this is this: Regardless of the art being made with AI or by an actual artist, the weak point in the process is the person providing the prompt. If the commissioner doesn't word their prompt well, the AI results will be less than stellar. This is when the intuition of a skilled artist has a better chance of beating AI.
I appreciate your honesty. As a working artist it would be very easy to let your bias dictate the out come of this video and be dishonest, but you called as it is and you were fair, even thought this new AI will unfortunately put a lot of artists out of work.
Honestly, I appreciate your very pragmatic take here. It‘s happening… if we like it or not, but this stuff is the future. So, we better come to terms with it. I like these videos. I think it‘s great what you‘re doing and I‘m not angry or disappointed that you‘re doing this. I actually think it‘s a lot of fun! However: I also have to say that it‘s a development I don‘t like fully. What bothers me is that there are entire industries who will now simply stop using actual artists and just start using this stuff. Videogames and movies especially. There is just no point in hiring concept artists, when you can just use these tools. They give you hundreds of options that you can change and adjust, and all of it in a very short period of time and for cheap. You‘ll just be ham-stringing yourself, if you hire actual artists in the future, instead of just using these tools. And that really, really hurts. Again, I get that it‘s coming and we simply have to accept it. But it still kinda sucks…
The only problematic thing i see here, and we at our school of arts and design are discussing, is prompting things „in the style of someone. When your style is your identity and the way you earn your living. I see it as very problematic that people just type in words to copy your style. Escpecially when you never gave the platform permission to use your art in the first place. 🤷🏻♂️ But i still love the idea of having AI as sort of some Idea generator. :)
10:34 third ai art from the left side going right, and also because it’s going by quickly I would also like to say it’s the last time he says prompt, that this is adorable
As a graphic designer and illustrator, I also feel inspired by AI's drawing/creative talents as I still believe our own human creativity is being utilised within the prompts given. I feel that there will always be a place for our own creativity to blossom and be admired.
the main issue I've seen with ai art that I actually agree with is not the risk of it putting artists out of business. I don't think that is going to happen. The big issue I see with it is that the images used for the training data were used without permission from the artists, when those artists are supposed to have control over how their images are used. because ai can then be used to imitate an artist's style, or even plagiarize their artworks in some cases, means that even though the exact piece might not be a pixel-for-pixel match with any existing piece of artwork, it could still be close enough to be passed off as such. there is a reason why counterfeit art is considered illegal, and ai art has the potential to run into those same sorts of issues.
@@igretrovods9189 except a lot of artists are only able to feed themselves because of income generated by their artwork being posted online and not stolen, whether because of ad revenue from ads shown alongside their work (which is a big part of how a lot of youtubers are able to do youtube as their full-time job), taking commisions from people who have seen their work (which is kind of hard to do without posting your work online for people to see and know you exist and know what sort of art you make), or people paying them money to support them continuing to make more work for the community to enjoy. while the ai seem to be currently limited mostly to still images, there is no reason to believe that it won't someday also be used to make videos and music. after all, the training data ultimately just needs to be something which can be encoded in the language of computers (which covers any and all media found on the internet). saying artists "can just not post their art online if they don't want to feed the ai" ignores the fact that for a lot of these artists, "not posting their artwork online" means "not eating" and "not having a place to live".
@vyhozshu odinyana while it is true that there is a lot of music which uses samples from other music, you had better believe that those samples are used with permission in almost all cases that reach the public through legitimate channels (the record labels make sure of that). the issue is not that ai art incorporates others' styles, but that it can be used to incorporate the actual works without permission, or even just a part of someone's work without permission. You said that you are an artist. how would you feel about someone taking the credit for a piece of art created using ai which contains a piece of your artwork stroke-for-stroke. or what if it is using your artwork as a starting point to build off of, but leaves it similar enough that you can still recognize it as being your artwork under whatever alterations have been made. (I know that isn't technically how the process works, but I am more trying to describe the end result, as the process is ultimately irrelevant in this context) how would you feel if someone started selling a shirt with a piece of your artwork on it without your permission (and then claimed that putting it on a shirt made it a different piece of artwork than the one that you created.) you mentioned that all artists take ideas and inspiration from other artists, but while this is true, any artist worth their salt also brings something of their own experiences to the things they create. However, an ai that makes art is missing that "bringing something of your own creation" aspect of the mix. if you think about how the ai training process actually works, it is basically training it to try and impersonate all of the artwork in the training database at once. if anything, ai artwork should probably be treated like a collage. the thing about collages using pieces of other people's works is that unless you have permission to use those works, it is still copyright infringement, no matter how much you add to the piece through the creation of the collage. this is why ai is such a problem: it is effectively making a collage from the works in the training data, but it doesn't have permission to use those works.
I am a bit split on AI... yes, it is a great tool for creative people, it can help to fast visualize things that are in your head but you just need a bit more reference to shape them out. AI can help with that. Or if you are making up some media project just for fun and need illustrations for environment but you suck at drawing backgrounds - AI can help with that. I am fascinated of DALL-E2, it is fun. BUT: I see it as a big disruption and I would not mind if it was stopped for good. Why? Because it will kill the wages for creative jobs. For a lot of corporate nuts those AI images (even if they are just average) are good enough. Why paying a real human if AI does it for free? Then there is the problem that it just can emulate styles that are already there (Miyazaki, Picasso, etc.). Or at least people will make it do that. I wonder if we ever are going to see new art styles if everything is done by AI soon... The content recycling is already too bad - even with humans! Let's just think for a minute about the topic: WHY is this kind of AI even created? What is the purpose? Why are a ton of programmers busy building things like an art AI instead of something "more useful for humanity"? Art at its basic used to be a thing for people to express themselves. Do they want to stop that? Or is it just the good old "we want to save money by destroying or at least devalueing another job category"? I would like to see one of those programmers and ask: Really, what were you thinking??
I feel like the programmers were experimenting one day with neural networks. But I would never say that they had a malicious intent, so I feel like you shouldn't be rude to the programmers.
@@Paper-dust No, I would not be rude to them. I would just ask what they were thinking - or if they were thinking about the consequences at all. See, the programmers are the people who DO stuff that they are told to do. And I know a lot of young people think "oooh, AI is so amazing and cool!" But what if somebody told them to create Skynet for (extreme) example? Shouldn't they think about what they are doing and maybe, just maybe, say "No" to that? BTW, I think neural networks do more harm than they are useful... just my oppinion.
@@lindendrache8998 who says they do more harm than they're useful? Do you realize how much people neural networks has helped? All the medicine created by it? All the financial scams foiled by it? all the help people with disabilities got from AI? All the genetic abnormalities discovered? Your opinion is talking about an industry being unsafe for some jobs somehow means AI is doing more harm. It's an opinion but it's an ignorant one.
@@dibbidydoo4318 Oh, let me guess, you are pretty young and work as a programmer that specializes in AI or are a huge fan of everything AI because it is "new and cool". I really don't know - Which medicine created by AI? Maybe some medicine that the humans would not need if we just would overthink and slightly alter our "civilized" lives? That sounded rude, but it isn't meant that way, I really want to discuss. I don't recognize any of the things you mentioned or why AI would be needed for them. People with disabilities - what kind of AI helps them and how? If somebody has a disability (let's talk about a body disability like missing a limb) - he /she needs a prosthetic and not AI! Creating AI for everything is like shooting with atombombs on birds. And you don't know the long-term outcome! It is like making everything "smart" for no reason. Why giving an external company the control over my light bulb for example when I could just toggle a switch whenever I want?
It would be interesting to see what an artist you work with would come up with in the same amount of time with the basic prompts you had in the beginning.
You almost hit the right workflow with drawing the upside down pot first, then feeding through the a.i. All you had to do was take the best result, then put that through the ai. Then take the best result from that ad infinitum, altering the prompt to fix certain features as you go. Occasionally combining the best features from different results in photoshop before putting it through the ai again and agian.
It's cool, and they look great. I'm not exactly anti, but I just find myself thinking about history. Sewing is a good example. We invented sewing machines and they can do so much at a time, and work at a pace human hands can't keep up with. But the problem was that sewing machines couldn't do it all. So we lost a lot of techniques, and we lost the knowledge of how to make things. Like there's a whole deep dive there. The same thing goes for iron working. Machines can do so much with working with materials, but in handing the job over to them we lost so many techniques and so much knowledge. I can't help but to think the same is going to go for art. Why bother to learn to be an artist when you can just go to a generator to make art for you? Why buy $100s in art supplies, which have to be replaced over and over again, when say $25 gets you this? Why hire someone to make art when you can have a person who just makes these all day? Why commission when you can make your own vision? Also I can't help but to feel weary that AI seems to be taking over so many industries like art, music, writing, etc. There's a whole conversation to be had about how robots were theorized to be taking over menial labor, but instead seem to be taking over everything outside of that and pushing people into menial labor instead.
I am on the other hand thankful to technology development. I am an architect and interior designer. I can't sketch with my hand.If programs like Revit,Autocad and sketchup wasn't developed i would have never entered this field. I don't have drawing skills but with the help of new technology i am able to show my imagination and even render it realistically in 3d. When i was a student we had to draw our layout plans on A1 papers by hand,but after graduating every place asked if i knew Autocad and 3ds max. I think our old soviet style teachers ignored the new technology,teached everything by 60s way and forgot to prepare us in real life after graduating.
You accurately showed both the frustrating aspects of creating AI art as well as the satisfying part. Writing a good prompt is not always easy. And… a prompt that works well in one program often does not work well in another. Which leads to lots of frustration, especially if you are trying to match specifics that you have in mind. All those images looked really cool, but they were not matching your vision. It took you many generations, dealing with the inherent randomness of the process that is always working against your attempts a specificity. It was impressive that you were able to get something satisfying by using the inpainting and outpainting features and not pulling pieces and parts into Photoshop.
Oh my gosh jazza! These are beautiful!! This is the turning point for me…. I have thought before the AI programs and art creation softwares were ok if not bad. But this has shown me a new world of possibilities and I just have to say I am excited for this even though there are implications and things that must be worked out. I think this was very eye opening and I am thankful! This light hearted video has changed my perspective wildly! Love your videos and the new channel is super cool I can’t wait to see where you go with all this ❤❤
Actually for the image itself it takes seconds for the coding to be able to do that more like years. Remember this likely takes from Google and likely the artist some of these creations are based on likely the artist isn't even aware that their style was used. That's what disgusts me about AI is it ethical and has all images used been given the correct permissions to use.
@@houndgirl7365 You make a good point about the ethicality of AI art. In order to make an effective AI art program, you have to pull a huge amount of data from a vast amount of sources, and undoubtedly a large percentage of that is going to be taken without permission. The problem is, these programs would be impossible to make if every artist was compensated in full for each art piece. So unless the program is funded by a government or giant corporation, they could never be made. On a more important note, AI/ML use in more safety critical areas (like cars) is way more unethical because we don't have any way to verify how safe they are, so drawing pictures on the internet is somewhat small in comparison
@@houndgirl7365 This doesn't take from Google. It doesn't search the internet when generating images. This isn't some sort of glorified photobashing. The ai is trained with images. Those images aren't stored in the ai models either. It just learned the gist of them. It's not making carbon copies of what other artists have made. It generates new stuff. You can't copyright artstyles. What do you think how humans learn. I hope you never use references in your life and have developed your own style from scratch without being influenced by anything you've ever seen in your life.
@@maythesciencebewithyou They were talking about unethical behavior, beside how about copyrighted work then? The Ai that write music will not use copyrighted one and only the ones submitted or copyright free, what’s with the double standard with other artist?
@@maythesciencebewithyou there are many examples of ai using an artist's work to where they could overlay the lines as well as the artist's signature being visible in the final image. These ais collect and compile, hencr the database they refer to. They use what the programmers and prompt writers put in it. Ita a glorified pony generator. Speaking of copyrighting styles, Disney did. (Of corse DISNEY did.)Hell Disney can sue any one of us for drawing Mickey. Hasbro has sent some cease and desists around over mlp. Have you ever heard of anything Konami does? Will blow your mind. Or even Nintendo. If something is too close to their work they can and will take it down. And these are just art examples.
One thing that grinds my gear with Ai generated art is that it could be really good with a little bit of tweaking, like just taking the image to photoshop and correcting some of the details and mistakes the program got wrong and you could have a solid piece of art, but ppl that generate AI images and post them as their «art » (or even sell it on like stock pictures websites and such ) rarely go the extra mile and all of the thing they post are always janky and uncanny when you look closely
One point would be how much time is spent on the development of the concept sketch with AI and Traditional respectively. But also how to apply it when you work on something like a comic book or similar when you need a larger sense of consistency while still coming up with something new.
I do think the results are really neat but i do also think that saying you could have commisioned someone for this for yes $100+ dollars and gotten it or have done this $10 with software kinda pushes more a of a point that commision artist especially which are a lot of the time the more up and coming and newer ones won't always have a place. I do think AI art will end up being regulated in the next 5 years along with a lot of potential rules and laws of how it is to be used in professional areas and overall a massive thing about who actually owns it which will be interesting to see how that all plays out as art is a massive part of history and culture there is a reason push back is very much there against AI art and most likely will be heavily regulated in the next 5 years because of it. I think AI art is really cool as a tool but i don't think it should be you can use this instead of commisioning someone you could use this tool for references and send to a artist to commision your ideal piece
the biggest problem, at least for me, is the rampant art theft someone made an entire ai based specifically on one artist so they could steal the style of that artist, and they were MAD that the artist was upset they stole their art?? so entitled personally, i'm using it to be entirely unique, not basing my prompts off any existing works i've seen and just going off ideas i come up with myself something i'm personally really excited for is being able to use them as thumbnails/sketches/color blocking for my own hand drawn art, it should be amazing for inspiration if you ever have art block and it'll cut down on the time it takes, at least for me, doing all the groundwork on a new piece and just get STARTED instead of trying to figure everything out
mm I agree I think the possibilities for AI works are massive and the are ways to use AI creatively. as well as making art more accessible if used as a tool
The core of the generation tools themselves *already* directly use the work of artists without their consent, it doesn't have to be trained on a specific artist's work. If you think models trained on specific artists are scummy (and yes, they are), consider what was used to make the root program.
I think AI has its place. For the low-budget average person who wants to see their ideas visually represented but don't have the talent to draw themselves or have the money to commission someone, sure. But you demonstrated how professional artists will always have a place with how long you struggled to get what you were envisioning. AI prompts can only do so much, but talking and conversing with someone you can explain to will always win out. People will use commission artists to get exactly what they want and will be able to do minor tweaks to fit their vision. Studios and companies will still need professional artists for that one-on-one to get the product made in a timely manner . Whenever something goes digital or automated, there is always the backlash that it's going to take away jobs. But that isn't always the fact. The human factor is always needed and sometimes the human touch is what's needed to make something better. Apologies for the ramble.😉
Jazza makes me relax a bit with the whole "AI is taking over" thing It should be used as a tool just the same as photoshop overlays/layer edits or specialty brushes (get Jazza's ULTIMATE BRUSH SET (not sponsored)). They're not cheats, they're tools; except this one is VERY powerful and we as artists shouldn't be afraid to adapt
I would hate this new AI development if it wasn’t for you putting a good spin on it. These videos actually help me to have a more positive outlook on the future of art. Thank you.
Look the problem with AI is it takes ALREADY EXISTING ART and mashes them together, that means your art too jazza, ANY art on the internet can be used, it means a lot of artists can lose their job because why would someone pay for their unique style when they could grab an AI, Jazza you've got to realise that this could also affect you
That's a stupid argument. That's like arguing that we should do away with computing devices and translation machines or else it's all doom and gloom for math majors and language majors. Sure, you can't hope to find sustainable employment just with primary school math and being able to read and write, anymore. But, mathematics, linguistics and related fields continue to flourish. Are you going to go out of your way to pay exorbitant prices to hire a human translator to be able to navigate through a website that's in a foreign language? Are you going to lecture a shopowner to eschew calculators and hire someone to perform their daily computing and bookkeeping? Or how do you feel about digital art? Certainly, that must have put not an insignificant dent on older art forms and must have eaten into the bottomlines of many a traditional artists. Doing away with all technological progress would automatically mean reducing the skill threshold and making a lot more people employable. So, should we all push society back to Stone Age or something? Skill yourself for a different job to pay the bills. Everyone one else had to do it, so will the run-of-the-mill artists. Art as a field will continue to flourish and thrive. The jobs in the field will just look different than they do now.
I think what people forget about AI art is that it entirely relies on human input, not just with the software it’s self but these things wouldn’t function without actual artists to source from & creatives to literally train n edit it to do as they want, so I don’t exactly see it as a threat. However, I do think their needs to be legality & permissions around sourcing material as it clearly steals from art uploaded online.
*Side note: by permissions I mean asking an artist to willingly sign up to train AI not forcing an artist to repeatedly opt out. (Fricken deviant art.🙃)
Jazza would you not have been more satisfied if you made the adjustments to legs and head tops and eyes yourself? I just feel using it for more than a prompt is taking the fun of the creativity out of the process!
Just a reminder that I JUST LAUNCHED a brand new art channel! Go subscribe, and help me name and built it into the perfect art channel!! ruclips.net/channel/UC3BCGz72VQcFdoBiZtKfOpg
Sup
U r such an amazing artist!
I used it to make Warframe characters it's insane how good it is like in horseshoes it's close enough
Like I was also doing ai for harpy costume and it adds a bag that is to die for or Birder others for I don't know
hmmmm i feel like you should do a word that you can spell backwards and forwards like (No lemon, no melon, that was a joke) Never odd or even.
I love that you went so hard into trying to make an evolution line that makes sense whereas the Pokemon company *sometimes* doesn't even follow that!
While a Remora-Revolver evolving into an Octopus-Tank makes more sense thematically, same goes with the instrument theme of the Pikipek line, I do feel the Sobble line could've leant more into the spy stuff.
Give examples, sounds like you’re talking out your butt
@@adellongino9413 just physical examples - because thats what the videos about - and that's all I'm talking about here, not lore wise
Dragonair / Dragonite
Clampearl / Gorebyss - Huntail
Gloom / blossom
Snorunt / frosslass - Glalie
Etc
bruh, pokemon's plenty faithful to their designs. You should see digimon. lmao
Neither does real life, to be honest
You should 3d print these Pokémon and make more diorama cards for them
I love these multi-media projects as well!
There was an AI technique published this year (I believe by Google) that could generate 3D models from a text prompt.
That may be perfect for 3d printing.
@@sebastianjost it's not put yet though.. i couldn't find the api anyway.. nvidia is also working on it
@@TheCatMurgatroyd that's true.
On the other hand I did just yesterday use DALL-E 2 to generate a heightmap of a simple hilly landscape as the background for another 3d model. So I basically have an AI generated landscape.
I also used DALL-E to generate textures for other parts of that model.
So you can definitely already do some things related to 3d modelling with current (semi-)public AIs.
@@sebastianjost oh definitely.. Blender already has some add ons
I was watching you develop those adorable grass starters, and it just ate away at me, so I gave them stats to turn them into something you would see in a Pokémon game. I am floored at how believable they turned out to be. So, here you go: the Pocotta evolution line.
Pocotta, the Vase Pokémon. Type: Grass and Rock. Size: 1' 7" 26 lbs. Egg group: Grass and Mineral. Evolves at level 19.
Exp yield: 102. Catch rate: 45 or 11.9%. Leveling rate: Medium slow. EV yield: 1 defense. Gender: 87.5 Male to 12.5 Female. Shiny color: White and blue.
Abilities: Overgrow (Boosts Grass attacks if low hp) and Clay Barrier (Greatly reduces the power of physical attacks but doubles Fighting weakness).
Stats: 60 HP, 60 Attack, 65 Defense, 45 Special Attack, 50 Special Defense, 20 Speed. Total of 300.
Pocotta is an unusually friendly species of Pokemon that is rarely seen but is rumored to adorn the homes of the rich. Any plant grown inside of it will never suffer from poor soil as the cells of the Pokémon itself, when shed, act as fertilizer for the soil. Barely moving, it prefers to lounge all day and snooze but will actively yap at it's owner. In battle, it uses mainly defensive moves and will never lose hope.
Plagro, the Mobile Pokémon. Type: Grass and Rock. Size: 5' 2" 47 lbs. Egg group: Grass and Mineral. Evolves at level 33.
Exp yield: 159. Catch rate: 45 or 11.9%. Leveling rate: Medium slow. EV yield: 2 defenses. Gender: 87.5 Male to 12.5 Female. Shiny color: White and red.
Abilities: Overgrow (Boosts Grass attacks if low hp) and Clay Barrier (Greatly reduces the power of physical attacks but doubles Fighting weakness).
Stats: 70 HP, 60 Attack, 85 Defense, 50 Special Attack, 80 Special Defense, 70 Speed. Total of 415.
Plagro are highly active Pokémon that have huge caring hearts. Able to hear the cries of another Pokémon from miles away through their roots in the ground, they will not hesitate to uproot themselves to run as fast as they can to see if there is anything wrong. When they aren't running around, they are usually seen in gardens tending to plants. Themselves being plants, they know the exact needs of any plant in the world and are experts of gardening. Their only downfall is being unable to communicate directly with humans, so pairing them with other Pokémon capable of speech with other Pokémon and humans such as Chatot is ideal.
Viant, the Towering Pokémon. Type: Grass and Rock. Size: 17' 4" 891 lbs. Egg group: Grass and Mineral.
Exp yield: 251. Catch rate: 3 or 1.6%. Leveling rate: Medium Slow to Slow. EV yield: 2 Defenses and 1 Speed. Gender: 87.5 Male to 12.5 Female. Shiny color: White red and gold.
Abilities: Overgrow (Boosts Grass attacks if low hp) and Stone Tree (Increases Defense in Sandstorm and Sunlight by 1 stage every turn).
Stats: 90 HP, 80 Attack, 120 Defense, 65 Special Attack, 80 Special Defense, 100 Speed. Total of 535.
Viant, also known as the Viridian Giant, are masters of creation, seen sleeping in ancient flowerbeds of past civilizations with growing plants that have been rumored to be extinct. Apparently, they can use any trace amount of plant in the soil around their roots and graft them onto their flesh, changing the plants growing on their bodies. Some have been seen growing crops, others with hedges, and a few have been rumored to be buried in the earth with entire forests sprouting from themselves. The main difference between male and female Viant are the shapes of the darker patches on the ears and the leaves above the tail: males will have jagged leaflike shapes while females will have heart shapes. The insanely flexible hard outer flesh has been compared to ceramic pottery found in modern times, but to a much less brittle structure. This allows a Viant to gallop freely and with incredible speed. A motivated Viant can move for hours at a time full speed nonstop if it means it can satisfy those closest to it. However, if it senses something behind it is trying to remove its plants from itself, it will kick with its feet so hard that it could shatter the thickest of bones.
Viant also has access to a unique move: Potted Pummel. A physical contact Rock attack with 140 base power, 85 accuracy, and 5 PP. Every time Viant uses this attack, it will have a much higher chance for critical hits, equivalent to using Focus Energy with Super Luck. However, this comes at a price: not only does it have a chance to miss, but every successful hit will lower Viant's Defense by 1 stage.
"The user will glare at the target then leap into the air and land feet first onto their opponent's head, kicking wildly until its feet start to crack."
Yes this took ages but I'm happy with this. If Jazza sees this, I hope he would be impressed. I feel like these guys could be real, and at the same time balanced as well.
Underrated comment
Wow you did an amazing job, I need them to be real now !!
I really enjoyed reading through your describtions! You did a great job and it really feels like they would be a solid addition for the next generation! I would totally have one of them in my team (:
Incredible!!
Well done. I hope Jazza sees this.
Here's an idea for you Jazza, train your own AI using only your artwork. See if it can replace you.
Looks like this bot already has lol
@@manowa3395 I'm so sick of these dang bots lol
@@kariosa_ Yeah, but ain't nothing RUclips will do about it :(
@@kariosa_ recreating a style from given examples is an active area of research and already a supported feature in some AIs.
Training a whole AI like DALL-E on just Jazz's art won't work because that requires millions of images. But synthesising his style might only require one or up to 10000. So that may be feasible in the near future (if it doesn't already exist).
If you haven't already, I may try out asking DALL-E 2 for an artwork in Jazzas style... Maybe it already knows him.
@@manowa3395 youtube can't just go and delete every bot at once
You dropped the ball not calling the fire egg “eggnite” or “eggnition” lol
If Fidough can be a name, so can Goodbuoy.
Ai isn’t great with specifics but is good to get an over all feel for what you want to make, kinda like finding reference for a drawing
These ai are just getting better. Google already has one that is really good with specifics, but it isn't public yet.
@@maythesciencebewithyou and they are getting better at an alarming pace.
the first version of DALL-E was much worse than DALL-E 2 and is not much older.
And from what I have seen so far, progress is only getting faster, especially with the popularity of DALL-E 2, midjourney and Stable Diffusion.
@@sebastianjost Not to mention with other types of AI like ChatGPT 3, which can create entire fantasy settings (I had it make an encyclopedia by having it make a setting, then making a table of contents for the various things in that setting as if it were for a book, then asking it to write specific pages from the table of contents), stories, and code/do complex math for you.
@@discord4039 I had it make up a new language. It even used the made up vocabulary to make cohesive sentences. To be fair though, it seemed to be based on English grammar rules. It essentially replaced every word, prefix, suffix, etc with its own word. However, the sounds it used was consistent with most words, so it wasn’t totally random. I gave it entire prompts and asked it to give the answer in the language, and then translate it into English, and it worked. I even checked words and it was all consistent.
@@antivireimagine in the far future someone adopts an ai generated language only for them and a large community who liked the language became isolated, like there was an apocalypse and they had to restart humanity. The language they use was originally created by a machine and their children will never know
That feel when he's basically asking for buizel(minus the water legs) but he doesn't know pokemon enough to know who buizel is. The first looked a lot like him!
I am not anti-ai, but as an aspiring artist myself I can’t help but worry what it means for the industry I hope to join. I think most people think that ai will take away jobs from artists, and I’m kinda worried about that too. At the same time though, I know that an ai will never to be able to create the same art that I will create, which gives my art some sort of value.
I totally get it. If Jazza is any example though, it seems that the path moving forward is for artists to USE ai as a tool to speed their art. Kinda like in other industries, I think that artists who work with technology will out-compete artists who don’t.
Nah you'll be good
nah ai can def make what you make and make it even better 💀
@@emperor8716 Let's be real, it can't duplicate specific styles. It also doesn't result in lightfast physical works.
It's going to revolutionize fap material, sure. Actual art, not so much.
Its a valid concern. Not only does AI has an infinite amount of references from other artists' copyrighted material, but it also saves the most used prompts and the most shared images to know exactly what the general public likes. In the near future it will be able to auto prompt images the user will love, and video AI from a small set of images is already a reality. Imagine a full animation rendered by a AI, which already knows the prompts you love and automatically makes it for you. I'd say we wil be there in less than 5 years
I'm not anti-AI, but it definitely makes me nervous. Like you mentioned, people will no longer need to pay for commissioned art, and that is how nearly every artist I know broke in to the professional side of art. Without taking commissions, it will be MUCH harder for artists (myself included) to build a name for themselves, or to kickstart a career.
Ai can create art like this but it doesn’t have that human touch thats most artists have
@@Lilhiphop That "human touch" or "human soul" is simply not a real thing. Its massive cope to say that human art will always be better than ai art which is just simply not true especially with how good ai art has got in the past couple of months. Everyone who is a artist should be reasonably scared, BUT it is progress and you cant stop it. Just like the internet and phones.
@@changedcj007 I think there is something to be said for an artists story. People can write a story for an AI and give it stylistic cues, but at the end of the day an AI doesn't have a human life behind it, and I think the human experience and process of creativity is one of the things that make art so impressive. I can see artists who use AI as their main tool for creating artwork, we already see many artists who use photoshop and the like who didn't used to be considered 'real artists', so I can imagine a future where artists exist who are renowned for creating art through AI, but I don't see AI taking the same role as artists by themselves. I do see a future where AI artists take a lot of corporate jobs and 'marketable artwork' positions, but I think there will always be a market for human artwork (although perhaps more niche), made by individuals with stories, and that nearly any medium can survive through technological changes.
Similarly, I view AI image generators with a sense of ... ambivalence.
Are they a neat little thing to tool around with? Yes, you simply cannot deny that.
Is designing a quality prompt an actual skill? Yes.
BUT...
First, depending on the specific generator you might use, the limitations can become apparent quickly. AI struggles generally when fine details are involved, it struggles with poses and compositions, the sorts of things which a human artist would get right on the first pass. Not all generators support in/out-painting features, meaning sometimes the best you can hope for is to recycle the same RNG seed while continuing to engineer the prompt.
Second, the economic fear of AI being used to supplant paid human art is REAL. On the timeless spectrum of "quality vs quantity" AI clearly leans into the "quantity" end, and so too does large-scale corporate culture. Jobs that are lost to technology don't come back, at least as long as that technology is still being employed (pun intended).
And I've taken a few dives myself down the iceberg of prompting an AI generator here and there.
I really liked a lot of the interim creatures, too. Thanks a lot for demonstrating the process so much in depth!
The big kicker with ai artwork is that you can't opt out of having your art used to train it, and if a big corporation wants your style and can use ai to get it, then that's what they're going to use instead of paying you.
I didn't even think of that, Imagine just like when they navigated copyright and dvd burning, I imagine they still would get creative to protect their money, Hollywood solved an impossible issue and even with people never stopping dvd ripping, they still secured their money by changing the way they distributed and peoples mentality changed with it. It was really something to see, they did the same with Mp3 Copies, solving the issue mostly with services like spotify, for A.i art - they might block the name you can input OR.. They might even use NFT's Incorporate some way to Lock an art style so that it cant be accessed so easily. People will come up with ways to protect their money pretty quickly.
@@OfTheiAm it's artists who are *individuals* being exploited here. Our artwork has already been scraped, and there is no way to get it out of AI databases. There is no way to protect our works at this moment and there won't be until we get laws regulating AIs, which is hard to make happen.
In the meantime, corporations *are* going to profit off our stolen work. They have no interest in changing public perception to "AI art = stolen, bad" because they now don't have to pay someone for what they want.
@@artsymarsy8480 Why don't copyright lawyers agree with you though?
@@TunaIRL because there are currently no laws governing AI use for this.
@@artsymarsy8480 There are no laws yet because it's an immensely complicated topic. Stop acting like you know better than professionals.
the ai just takes other people's art and compiles it into something "new". oftentimes against the artist's wishes of their art not being stolen and/or redistributed. it's not art, its borderline stealing and is taking jobs from actual artists who care about their craft enough not to use these shady ai sites.
Yup sadly jazza doesn't seem to care I have stopped drawing now
the backgrounds these AI can come up with are so good I think it makes a lot of sense that many people will draw their main subject and then fill in a background with AI. I'm curious if you could use it to quickly get a base design for a character and then draw in the details you had in mind that the AI either missinterprettued or ignored.
I see AI Art as an two sided sword. It is an wonderful tool and the power it has is phenomenal. It blow my mind as I saw this. I'm a little worried that some firms are shifting they work. Instead an Artist, you have an AI Prompt Employee. So you write the perfect sentence and look for the photo until you find a match. At least for me it's not fulfilling work.
Jazza, I like to edit/Photoshop pictures for fun. I love your persistence when trying to get what you want when looking for a picture to use. When I edit I always try and have the mindset of getting exactly what I want onto the picture. It is like solving a problem, using all the tools from photoshop to get what I want. All that to say, keep up the good work, loved this video.
You have to admit: this could be disastrous for the freelancer. You just said it "I could have commissioned this for hundreds of dollars." Obviously, in this setting and context, it's not the case, but that's potentially hundreds of dollars that are not going to a freelance artist. Artists are now possibly facing a crisis similar to what's killed previous trades of the past: a much cheaper and more efficient alternative
It truly is a possibility, but, I don't see it going away forever and I see AI artists becoming a real thing as well which could open up a new door in the industry as most people who require art won't be doing it themselves at the very least. Maybe in the far future full fledged AI will just take commands but we arn't there yet lol
I also have started using this myself to formulate templates and ideas, etc for my own works using things I'd never thought to before or even just when I'm stuck
@@dognbundad You might want to lower your prices, considering how much AI art has dropped artistic value.
@@dognbundad open doors? That's dumb. The joy of art is making it yourself with sensations and references that you yourself feel and subconsciously process to make an idea.
Take that away and it would be a dead-end job. Efficiency doesn't mean it's fulfilling, please reconsider such stances. We can't let "if we can" dictate us, it always be "if we should" first.
Good artists will stay, 80% will be go away. Art being made by hand won't go, but do note what happened to the craftsman who've dedicated their lives on their craft, only for factories to appear... we're only opening doors to people who don't spend years on the craft, do you seriously think such an invention should even exist, LIKE ART OF ALL THINGS?
I understand machinery and physical products. But this is just insanity that we need to effectively make the idea of concepts and art to be made be efficient? How dystopian and stupid, the abstract thought of art, bound by not physical sensation but the imagination of it in paper. Meaning there aren't even any + to the common folk, we won't get to eat more nor have nicer comforts of living... just an endless stream of imaginations of reality, i must not be the only one who sees this. Laws should be there to protect us like music artists, but we get distraught instead
Technology does that a lot lol. No one here probably remembers, but a LOT of people used to be employed for their handwriting ability. It's sad but it's not technology's fault, it's capitalism creating the issue.
I found that for making Pokémon, out of Stable, Dall-E 2, and Nokemon, Stable was the best, Nokemon was really good, and Dall-E 2, was pretty good. Nokemon was especially interesting because I could input types instead of text, however, must of the designs look really weird so some people would probably not like it nearly as much as the others. Dall-E 2 consistently made mons that made sense but also looked like Pikachu but that may have been because I used the word Pokémon in the prompt. Lastly I've used Stable the most so I've become pretty accustomed to what it can and can't understand so it made the best for me.
P.S. I used the website NightCafe for access to Dall-E 2 and stable and so I didn't have to input the style they have preset styles if you prefer that but it's not necessary.
I wonder if Jazza would look at AI generators differently if they'd been around when he was starting out as an artist.
not these type of comments yet again.
Instead of learning to use the available abundant resources you all choose to be whiny bishes... Your art is mediocre by default and you should be ashamed.
“Your Opponent’s Active Pokemon is *no* Burned”
🙂
Im gonna be honest, the grass pokemon def should have evolved into a chunky pokemon with terracotta armor pieces, attached together with vines.
AI art is really cool and it's so interesting to experiment with, but the fact that you even said in the video that A.I. could be an alternative to commissioning artists is exactly why A.I. art may not be the best path to go down. People who take commissions are already surviving on a freelance income which isn't very reliable and there are already so many people out there complaining that they have to pay for art at all. This could destroy a freelance artist's livelihood. Second, say people start faking the fact that they are an artist using A.I. art and people find out, those people would ruin any trust that people had in the art community and make finding willing commissioners even harder. I mean, AI art is cool and interesting, yet it is also dangerous and you as an artist can surely understand that some people who rely on commissions for income may feel uneasy about this. That being said, this video was great, again AI is really intersting. I don't think that anyone's feelings of uneasiness are invalid just because it's cool though
Jazza doesn't care. He already has his money-making schtick, so what does it matter if it hurts smaller artists? He'll just continue to use it to make videos to make himself even more money.
I feel that makes a rather large assumption that this will remain free, and or inexpensive. I think as the technology improves, and by extension the processing power required that these things will no longer be a "cheap alternative" to commissioning an art piece.
Look at AI writing tools for example, those started off relatively affordable or even free, but that has been shifting as those become more advanced, there are free and open source versions out there that you can use your own hardware to run (but it's very taxing on your system if you try to use a model that is beyond basic) or you start having to fork over more and more money for better stronger models.
I'm not saying your fear is unwarranted, it scares me too. Just a random competing thought of sorts I suppose.
@@demikus I agree with you. This is just like any tool that requires its own investment to get results from. Even that can be commissioned in the future, the value of effort and time always remains.
@@demikus That's actually a really good point. The only thing I would say to argue that is that art relies more on specific patrons than writing does, because once a writer publishes a book, pretty much the whole world is it's audience. With commissioned art peices, it's usually one person who commissions these artist and since they are custom they tend to be expensive as the quality increases. If people who have the money to buy quality art stop, then artist will have to lower their prices to a wage that they may not be able to live on because the only costumers they have are the people who can't afford AI. Now I don't think my argument is particularly strong because it disregards the varying prices in freelance work and the value of AI over custom art is if it isn't cheaper. Because essentially the only advantage of AI over commissioned is the fact that it is cheaper. The problem however is that in the present it is cheaper and if it stays cheap for much longer, some careers and some dreams could be annihalated. Here's hoping AI art will become more expensive for public use as you have predicted though.
Finally, an easy tool to help make those pesky artists completely obsolete! Been dreaming of this day for years.
Cool video! It was a great basic overview of how to create prompts and the results were awesome! 👍🏻
I have a feeling that because the last evolution walks around on terracotta pots they are constantly breaking them and has to find or get new ones!😂
Ability: Foot smash:
Boosts speed and reduces defense when they break!
The current way AI functions depends on existing art. The whole thing feels a little like more of the same: artists create and innovate, and their work gets reworked (won't quite say stolen...) for someone else's benefit. Obviously not the same straight up fraud we saw in your Fiver commissions, but the world's artists taught AI how to art, and I imagine few received anything back for it. The technology is gorgeous and amazing. I agree it produces both humor and inspiration. I agree there will always be a place for artists, because many artist are artists for their own souls and AI can't replace an artist's soul. It's still discouraging. But novel things often are.
I really liked the third option at 10:35! That one is so fun!
OMG!! this was my suggestion of a video in the last A.I video!!! love it
I agree with most comments I saw about the AI. It's fascinating, yet devastating. I am an artist who already struggle to make a living out of my art and when I first saw that these AIs existed, I was super scared. What does it mean for the future of artists? Devaluation, minimizing our value and worth, going for AI instead of artists, scamming people using AIs and devaluing the profession with doing so are all real concerns and we are going there. I just hope it won't take too much space in the community...
This is participation trophies all over again. 🙄 Smh. Art comes from within the artist, not a robot. 🤖 This is just another way to do away with us who truly have God given talent and skill that we've busted our butts honing for years and years and years. 😤 I believe if you want to learn art and really want to appreciate what goes into honing the craft, you need to do it the old fashion way and learn to love what you do like real artists do. Ai was designed to supplant us. Seeing what you, I, and other true artists can do with our hands, pencils, and brushes inspires people! Machines replace people and destroy lives and bury true talent.
Back to traditional art I guess.
@@johnglow7845 yep. I think digital art will soon become extremely difficult to make money with. Stinks because I haven’t painted or drawn with traditional materials in years, but looks like I gotta stop using the Wacom and go back to paint or something. This tech sucks.
Is your problem ai art or capitalism really?
@@pagreg888 To me? mnh I'd say both kinda? I don't like the idea of AI art and I'm not a fan of capitalism either. Weither we like it or not, AI art will be subject to capitalism in a way or another. We can't really separate AI art from capitalism, because of that. If you don't like capitalism, you won't like what comes with AI art. =/ I think so anyway.
Ignitch, ignition match pokemon. Names it "Ingitch."
You should’ve used OpenAI’s Playground text generator to come up with the names too. EDIT: describing your Pokémon, I tried it and got Pottle, Willywort and Vinegaroon.
Oh, you should use the text generator to come up with the art prompts for a new video.
A vinegaroon is an already existing arachnid that looks similar to a scorpion :)
@@felixhenson9926 Damn AI! It had one job! 😅
quite honestly, i think the way you did it worked really well where you used AI to get a base idea, then used your own artistic skills to build on top of that. This could easily just also be a tool to help an artist in a rut that just doesn't know where to start a project. A blend of AI and Reality this way I feel is great.
Now...imagine if this could be done for VR/AR and combined with a program like Tilt Brush? I wonder how that would workout.
I mean, maybe you'd get less angry people if you didn't deliberately point out that this would have killed a few commissions. I know this is happening, and we have to accept it, but that doesn't mean I have to _celebrate_ it. I'm sure you personally will never lose a job because of AI art, which is why it's so easy for you to be so happy with it, but the smaller artists will suffer a lot from this, and I find it really hard to get enthusiastic about it.
By the way, if you want to try this out then prepare to either wait for a really long time or spend a bunch of money, because you need credits in order to use the AI. You get 50 free credits when you start and 15 credits after every month. I haven't gotten the results I wanted because I thought it was all free, and I don't plan on buying credits any time soon, but I think I have several images for reference anyway.
Just a reminder that after around your first 50 prompts from Dall-E, it cost $15 for more credits.
Actually kind of like what Jazza ended up with his potted plant Pokémon, looks very cute and can see it fitting in the world. Can imagine the first two forms being found in gardens and green houses, posing as regular plants sitting on desks and hanging from archways. Can see the third being out on mansion grounds hiding among various foliagecovered sculptures and hedges, staying completely still, surprising unsuspecting trainers wandering too close thinking it a mere work of art. As for evolving, can see the first time being at a certain level, with the second time requiring a sun stone or something. So yeah, wouldn’t mind seeing this thing in the game, would definitely catch it.
I think the AI art is cool, I figure it'll be used for the type of art you buy at a chain store. I think there will always be a place for artists, especially when people want something that's truly one of a kind
Really loved this video! Can't wait for more AI stuff it's really cool!
"There will always be a space for artist"
What space will that be? And how small will that space become?
Will that space still feel rewarding? Still provide that spark of joy from showing someone an image you've created?
Or will artist just become factory workers, pumping out pieces to feed into AI.
AI is a Genie gorged on stolen work that non artist are all too happy to embrace, because it gets them what they want without any of the downsides. I think it is the duty of those artist with a voice to defend against this AI incursion, and not to down play it's very real impact.
It is already crowding out artist in the commission and design field.
You yourself used it to not have to pay a concept artist.
Will it take someone making an AI art channel named Jazzai before you realize the dangers?
This. Jazza not paying royalties to the artists this ai has pinched artworks to amalgamate.
Idk if ur new o didn’t r fully pay attention what he say at the end. He realize the danger and the downside, but he also view as a helpful tool to help artist to get a inspiration or reference on what to draw next. This isn’t replacing artist, the only danger is the scammer who stole art when someone pay them. Not AI. He using this tool to have fun. Which jazza show in one of a video where he pay a certain amount of money aka 1k$ to a paid artist, and what he got a stolen art and a badly photoshop imagine that is from google. That is bringing a bad light to other paid artist who actually do art. Not a AI who create art out of image that is online. And many artist don’t mind it and they are inspire from the art that ai created. It same as how artist get inspired from others artists art.
Really love your work and I'd love to see you sculpt them.
Hey jazza, I've been watching since you first 3d pen videos and I was very young. I'm now turning 17 in two weeks and I wanna say I really love your content.
Keep it up❤️
Ive been waiting for more pokemon vids!
13:52 You *just* explained why so many struggling artists are afraid/sad about these AI art programs...
Greedy companies everywhere will replace all art jobs with this AI as soon as they are able to.
Great video! Loved this.
AI art will replace a big chunk of the clip art/stock image usage and also a considerable chunk of the market for professional illustrators. It will also be used as a tool for professional illustrators to reduce the time spent (and thereby the cost) creating art and the illustrator will use both text prompts and draw graphic prompts, and then retouch the AI produced images to fit the requirement better. There will be produced vastly more images specifically for one purpose, and by using AI combined with skills to adjust and fix the images, illustrators will still have quite a bit of work. AI will be integrated into art programs like Photoshop, both with text prompts, image prompts and as magic brushes/filters. I think that is a fairly short term prediction, and I don't think it is a wild prediction. How it will change longterm is harder to say, but it is obvious that AI art will also enter the video market.
Sorry, but you can’t work with AI. The tools and interface will improve rapidly and require no expertise, touch ups, hand corrections, or artistic vision to use. The only way to survive is to eschew AI completely and make physical products using paint and paper.
These came out really cool!
I'm a bit torn on the ai art subject. On one hand it's insanely cool what you can achieve and I think personally I might end up using it for inspiration or trying out compositions for my own artworks but on the other hand I feel like it might end up watering down the art community and degrade the worth of original art even more. What I mean by that is that in general people don't appreciate og art already when it comes to actually paying for a commission etc and with these tools you just need a few prompts and basically no money or effort. I also see a big problem coming up with scammers pretending they actually painted an ai piece themselves.
same here, its a great resource for those who cant draw but i cant help but wonder if this will further open the door to exploiting artists and making it harder to actually survive off of art at all
personally, its hard to know what to say when i know that it wont be used just by the people who need it to express their own creativity, it will be used by big corporations & scammers alike, even if people genuinely want to support creatives & artists and want more genuine things. . . whose to say they'll be able to tell the difference between AI vs actual creatives & artists in the first place?
"You opponent's Active Pokémon is no Burned."
I wasn’t the only one to notice that 😅
This art is neat but I fear it'll deter the actual artist who draws from ever trying to improve. Instead just type things out and boom the computer does it for you.
That is a down side but an upside is that it can help artists, by giving them ideas, references, poses, and more, so there's the bright side.
I actually think it'll do quite the opposite, every artist gas there own style and whole good programs like darle can't copy the uniqueness of a individuals art, in fact I believe Darley will allow artist to thrive more in looking for references for ideas they have but don't know quite the look for. But hey that's just me
A real artist wants to draw though. It's just people who don't want to make the effort to learn art who make ai generations. Real artists are using ai to generate ideas. Not to replace their work.
the thing that botheres me is people putting these in folios for professional jobs without able to show the process of actually designing something from scratch. Many studios & Courses however luckily DO only hire you based on your process and not your final work - but there are many companies that don't make those checks and when they ask you how you came up with their company logo and want you to talk you through it, these people will have zero idea and will make those companies either think twice hiring another designer or black list the person as someone who cannot operate professionally (which isn't a great thing if you're starting your art career.) there are artists who do use AI and fully detail their process and that might be the better way to go. AI art isn't making you an Artist, it's making you an Art Director and the difference between a good AD and a bad AD is the process and knowledge on what they're doing. there's far too many bad Art Directors out there unfortunately.
14:08 is for u
It’s funny watching you and your brother, Shad, play with AI art. You both get pretty excited and amused by the results.
I like how everyone in the comments is in denial, trying to convince themselves that AI can’t take their jobs. I used to think AI could never be good enough to do that, but after seeing this, yeah no we’re done for. AI can do a better job than most of us, and most people don’t care about it being “human” when buying art, they just want it to look good. In fact, I just found out people called “prompt engineers” have been popping up, they’re professional prompt writers who are good at finding the best AI art for people, and they obviously work much faster than actual artists. Now tell me who you think customers would go to 😂
Are you telling me the only difference between Artists and everyone else is technical skill? Where did all the ego go?
Jazza! Jazza! Jazza! I literally am so excited everyday to see if you upload
The takeaway I get from this is this: Regardless of the art being made with AI or by an actual artist, the weak point in the process is the person providing the prompt. If the commissioner doesn't word their prompt well, the AI results will be less than stellar. This is when the intuition of a skilled artist has a better chance of beating AI.
No.
I appreciate your honesty. As a working artist it would be very easy to let your bias dictate the out come of this video and be dishonest, but you called as it is and you were fair, even thought this new AI will unfortunately put a lot of artists out of work.
my motivation to make art dropped down to 0 lol
That just means you were never passionate about it in the first place if you gave up this easily
@@BhBc8f8 you better close your mouth arrogance is ugly my guy
This is so cool!
Please make a fire line and a water line from your other mons!
Honestly, I appreciate your very pragmatic take here.
It‘s happening… if we like it or not, but this stuff is the future. So, we better come to terms with it.
I like these videos. I think it‘s great what you‘re doing and I‘m not angry or disappointed that you‘re doing this. I actually think it‘s a lot of fun!
However:
I also have to say that it‘s a development I don‘t like fully.
What bothers me is that there are entire industries who will now simply stop using actual artists and just start using this stuff. Videogames and movies especially. There is just no point in hiring concept artists, when you can just use these tools. They give you hundreds of options that you can change and adjust, and all of it in a very short period of time and for cheap. You‘ll just be ham-stringing yourself, if you hire actual artists in the future, instead of just using these tools.
And that really, really hurts.
Again, I get that it‘s coming and we simply have to accept it. But it still kinda sucks…
@Jazza hows it going? Been loving all of ur content recently. Just wanted to say i appreciate ur effort and stuff. Thx man!
I kinda prefer it when you just draw stuff yourself , it’s more interesting for me.. not really bothered about what a computer can do
I kinda prefer it when he uses AI, it’s more interesting for me.. very interested in what a computer can do, and how it is used by artists
......he still does. He's been doing it for years you think he's just gonna stop??? Have you stopped doing math since the calculator was invented?
This is just wonderful!
The only problematic thing i see here, and we at our school of arts and design are discussing, is prompting things „in the style of someone. When your style is your identity and the way you earn your living. I see it as very problematic that people just type in words to copy your style. Escpecially when you never gave the platform permission to use your art in the first place. 🤷🏻♂️
But i still love the idea of having AI as sort of some Idea generator. :)
10:34 third ai art from the left side going right, and also because it’s going by quickly I would also like to say it’s the last time he says prompt, that this is adorable
As a graphic designer and illustrator, I also feel inspired by AI's drawing/creative talents as I still believe our own human creativity is being utilised within the prompts given. I feel that there will always be a place for our own creativity to blossom and be admired.
still isnt it sus that the moment you type in an artist name the result gets so much better? -,(._.),-
the main issue I've seen with ai art that I actually agree with is not the risk of it putting artists out of business. I don't think that is going to happen. The big issue I see with it is that the images used for the training data were used without permission from the artists, when those artists are supposed to have control over how their images are used. because ai can then be used to imitate an artist's style, or even plagiarize their artworks in some cases, means that even though the exact piece might not be a pixel-for-pixel match with any existing piece of artwork, it could still be close enough to be passed off as such. there is a reason why counterfeit art is considered illegal, and ai art has the potential to run into those same sorts of issues.
This comment exists on ever single ai art video out there. Chill out.
But the artists actually have control over their work. They can not post it online if they don’t want feed “evil” AI
@@igretrovods9189 except a lot of artists are only able to feed themselves because of income generated by their artwork being posted online and not stolen, whether because of ad revenue from ads shown alongside their work (which is a big part of how a lot of youtubers are able to do youtube as their full-time job), taking commisions from people who have seen their work (which is kind of hard to do without posting your work online for people to see and know you exist and know what sort of art you make), or people paying them money to support them continuing to make more work for the community to enjoy. while the ai seem to be currently limited mostly to still images, there is no reason to believe that it won't someday also be used to make videos and music. after all, the training data ultimately just needs to be something which can be encoded in the language of computers (which covers any and all media found on the internet). saying artists "can just not post their art online if they don't want to feed the ai" ignores the fact that for a lot of these artists, "not posting their artwork online" means "not eating" and "not having a place to live".
@vyhozshu odinyana while it is true that there is a lot of music which uses samples from other music, you had better believe that those samples are used with permission in almost all cases that reach the public through legitimate channels (the record labels make sure of that). the issue is not that ai art incorporates others' styles, but that it can be used to incorporate the actual works without permission, or even just a part of someone's work without permission. You said that you are an artist. how would you feel about someone taking the credit for a piece of art created using ai which contains a piece of your artwork stroke-for-stroke. or what if it is using your artwork as a starting point to build off of, but leaves it similar enough that you can still recognize it as being your artwork under whatever alterations have been made. (I know that isn't technically how the process works, but I am more trying to describe the end result, as the process is ultimately irrelevant in this context)
how would you feel if someone started selling a shirt with a piece of your artwork on it without your permission (and then claimed that putting it on a shirt made it a different piece of artwork than the one that you created.)
you mentioned that all artists take ideas and inspiration from other artists, but while this is true, any artist worth their salt also brings something of their own experiences to the things they create. However, an ai that makes art is missing that "bringing something of your own creation" aspect of the mix. if you think about how the ai training process actually works, it is basically training it to try and impersonate all of the artwork in the training database at once.
if anything, ai artwork should probably be treated like a collage. the thing about collages using pieces of other people's works is that unless you have permission to use those works, it is still copyright infringement, no matter how much you add to the piece through the creation of the collage. this is why ai is such a problem: it is effectively making a collage from the works in the training data, but it doesn't have permission to use those works.
I love how pocotta and plagro are both the exact same size and weight😂
I am a bit split on AI... yes, it is a great tool for creative people, it can help to fast visualize things that are in your head but you just need a bit more reference to shape them out. AI can help with that. Or if you are making up some media project just for fun and need illustrations for environment but you suck at drawing backgrounds - AI can help with that. I am fascinated of DALL-E2, it is fun.
BUT: I see it as a big disruption and I would not mind if it was stopped for good. Why? Because it will kill the wages for creative jobs. For a lot of corporate nuts those AI images (even if they are just average) are good enough. Why paying a real human if AI does it for free?
Then there is the problem that it just can emulate styles that are already there (Miyazaki, Picasso, etc.). Or at least people will make it do that. I wonder if we ever are going to see new art styles if everything is done by AI soon... The content recycling is already too bad - even with humans!
Let's just think for a minute about the topic:
WHY is this kind of AI even created? What is the purpose? Why are a ton of programmers busy building things like an art AI instead of something "more useful for humanity"?
Art at its basic used to be a thing for people to express themselves. Do they want to stop that?
Or is it just the good old "we want to save money by destroying or at least devalueing another job category"?
I would like to see one of those programmers and ask: Really, what were you thinking??
I feel like the programmers were experimenting one day with neural networks. But I would never say that they had a malicious intent, so I feel like you shouldn't be rude to the programmers.
@@Paper-dust No, I would not be rude to them. I would just ask what they were thinking - or if they were thinking about the consequences at all.
See, the programmers are the people who DO stuff that they are told to do. And I know a lot of young people think "oooh, AI is so amazing and cool!"
But what if somebody told them to create Skynet for (extreme) example? Shouldn't they think about what they are doing and maybe, just maybe, say "No" to that?
BTW, I think neural networks do more harm than they are useful... just my oppinion.
@@lindendrache8998 how cynical are you?
@@lindendrache8998 who says they do more harm than they're useful? Do you realize how much people neural networks has helped? All the medicine created by it? All the financial scams foiled by it? all the help people with disabilities got from AI? All the genetic abnormalities discovered? Your opinion is talking about an industry being unsafe for some jobs somehow means AI is doing more harm. It's an opinion but it's an ignorant one.
@@dibbidydoo4318 Oh, let me guess, you are pretty young and work as a programmer that specializes in AI or are a huge fan of everything AI because it is "new and cool".
I really don't know - Which medicine created by AI? Maybe some medicine that the humans would not need if we just would overthink and slightly alter our "civilized" lives?
That sounded rude, but it isn't meant that way, I really want to discuss.
I don't recognize any of the things you mentioned or why AI would be needed for them. People with disabilities - what kind of AI helps them and how? If somebody has a disability (let's talk about a body disability like missing a limb) - he /she needs a prosthetic and not AI!
Creating AI for everything is like shooting with atombombs on birds. And you don't know the long-term outcome!
It is like making everything "smart" for no reason. Why giving an external company the control over my light bulb for example when I could just toggle a switch whenever I want?
Try ‘image to image’ using SD by automatic1111
It would be interesting to see what an artist you work with would come up with in the same amount of time with the basic prompts you had in the beginning.
What? The AI does this in seconds.
You almost hit the right workflow with drawing the upside down pot first, then feeding through the a.i. All you had to do was take the best result, then put that through the ai. Then take the best result from that ad infinitum, altering the prompt to fix certain features as you go. Occasionally combining the best features from different results in photoshop before putting it through the ai again and agian.
"workflow" such an absurd take. Just DRAW the thing
It's cool, and they look great.
I'm not exactly anti, but I just find myself thinking about history.
Sewing is a good example. We invented sewing machines and they can do so much at a time, and work at a pace human hands can't keep up with.
But the problem was that sewing machines couldn't do it all. So we lost a lot of techniques, and we lost the knowledge of how to make things. Like there's a whole deep dive there.
The same thing goes for iron working. Machines can do so much with working with materials, but in handing the job over to them we lost so many techniques and so much knowledge.
I can't help but to think the same is going to go for art.
Why bother to learn to be an artist when you can just go to a generator to make art for you? Why buy $100s in art supplies, which have to be replaced over and over again, when say $25 gets you this? Why hire someone to make art when you can have a person who just makes these all day? Why commission when you can make your own vision?
Also I can't help but to feel weary that AI seems to be taking over so many industries like art, music, writing, etc.
There's a whole conversation to be had about how robots were theorized to be taking over menial labor, but instead seem to be taking over everything outside of that and pushing people into menial labor instead.
I am on the other hand thankful to technology development. I am an architect and interior designer. I can't sketch with my hand.If programs like Revit,Autocad and sketchup wasn't developed i would have never entered this field. I don't have drawing skills but with the help of new technology i am able to show my imagination and even render it realistically in 3d. When i was a student we had to draw our layout plans on A1 papers by hand,but after graduating every place asked if i knew Autocad and 3ds max. I think our old soviet style teachers ignored the new technology,teached everything by 60s way and forgot to prepare us in real life after graduating.
omg i loved this!!! they're all so cute :D
This absolutely isn't me watching Jazza before going to bed in Germany at 4:30am lol
You accurately showed both the frustrating aspects of creating AI art as well as the satisfying part. Writing a good prompt is not always easy. And… a prompt that works well in one program often does not work well in another. Which leads to lots of frustration, especially if you are trying to match specifics that you have in mind. All those images looked really cool, but they were not matching your vision. It took you many generations, dealing with the inherent randomness of the process that is always working against your attempts a specificity. It was impressive that you were able to get something satisfying by using the inpainting and outpainting features and not pulling pieces and parts into Photoshop.
Oh my gosh jazza! These are beautiful!! This is the turning point for me…. I have thought before the AI programs and art creation softwares were ok if not bad. But this has shown me a new world of possibilities and I just have to say I am excited for this even though there are implications and things that must be worked out. I think this was very eye opening and I am thankful! This light hearted video has changed my perspective wildly! Love your videos and the new channel is super cool I can’t wait to see where you go with all this ❤❤
This was just so good and that's awesome
Cool results! I’m curious how many hours it took to create prompts for these. It looks like an involved process.
Actually for the image itself it takes seconds for the coding to be able to do that more like years. Remember this likely takes from Google and likely the artist some of these creations are based on likely the artist isn't even aware that their style was used. That's what disgusts me about AI is it ethical and has all images used been given the correct permissions to use.
@@houndgirl7365 You make a good point about the ethicality of AI art. In order to make an effective AI art program, you have to pull a huge amount of data from a vast amount of sources, and undoubtedly a large percentage of that is going to be taken without permission. The problem is, these programs would be impossible to make if every artist was compensated in full for each art piece. So unless the program is funded by a government or giant corporation, they could never be made.
On a more important note, AI/ML use in more safety critical areas (like cars) is way more unethical because we don't have any way to verify how safe they are, so drawing pictures on the internet is somewhat small in comparison
@@houndgirl7365 This doesn't take from Google. It doesn't search the internet when generating images. This isn't some sort of glorified photobashing. The ai is trained with images. Those images aren't stored in the ai models either. It just learned the gist of them. It's not making carbon copies of what other artists have made. It generates new stuff. You can't copyright artstyles. What do you think how humans learn. I hope you never use references in your life and have developed your own style from scratch without being influenced by anything you've ever seen in your life.
@@maythesciencebewithyou They were talking about unethical behavior, beside how about copyrighted work then? The Ai that write music will not use copyrighted one and only the ones submitted or copyright free, what’s with the double standard with other artist?
@@maythesciencebewithyou there are many examples of ai using an artist's work to where they could overlay the lines as well as the artist's signature being visible in the final image. These ais collect and compile, hencr the database they refer to. They use what the programmers and prompt writers put in it. Ita a glorified pony generator. Speaking of copyrighting styles, Disney did. (Of corse DISNEY did.)Hell Disney can sue any one of us for drawing Mickey. Hasbro has sent some cease and desists around over mlp. Have you ever heard of anything Konami does? Will blow your mind. Or even Nintendo. If something is too close to their work they can and will take it down. And these are just art examples.
the water doggy has a strange protrusion from its chest, which i find is common in ai art : weird shaped body parts ESPECIALLY hands
One thing that grinds my gear with Ai generated art is that it could be really good with a little bit of tweaking, like just taking the image to photoshop and correcting some of the details and mistakes the program got wrong and you could have a solid piece of art, but ppl that generate AI images and post them as their «art » (or even sell it on like stock pictures websites and such ) rarely go the extra mile and all of the thing they post are always janky and uncanny when you look closely
Yes, you are right. something is always slightly off with them. Not as bad as it used to be (depending on the subject) but still...
@@lindendrache8998 maybe it’s a lack of knowledge, like human anatomy?
@@randominternetuser2436 Could be, yes. Because AI is processing things differently than humans.
thats insane! very creepy how easy it is now
I could legit watch hours of this style of video Jazza. I was even able to get friends who don't care for art to check this out!
That Pocotta should definitely have been called "Pottish" it's just a terracotta Oddish lol
Regional form oddish, or like Wigglet
One point would be how much time is spent on the development of the concept sketch with AI and Traditional respectively.
But also how to apply it when you work on something like a comic book or similar when you need a larger sense of consistency while still coming up with something new.
I do think the results are really neat but i do also think that saying you could have commisioned someone for this for yes $100+ dollars and gotten it or have done this $10 with software kinda pushes more a of a point that commision artist especially which are a lot of the time the more up and coming and newer ones won't always have a place. I do think AI art will end up being regulated in the next 5 years along with a lot of potential rules and laws of how it is to be used in professional areas and overall a massive thing about who actually owns it which will be interesting to see how that all plays out as art is a massive part of history and culture there is a reason push back is very much there against AI art and most likely will be heavily regulated in the next 5 years because of it. I think AI art is really cool as a tool but i don't think it should be you can use this instead of commisioning someone you could use this tool for references and send to a artist to commision your ideal piece
Pocotta must be protected at all costs.
the biggest problem, at least for me, is the rampant art theft
someone made an entire ai based specifically on one artist so they could steal the style of that artist, and they were MAD that the artist was upset they stole their art?? so entitled
personally, i'm using it to be entirely unique, not basing my prompts off any existing works i've seen and just going off ideas i come up with myself
something i'm personally really excited for is being able to use them as thumbnails/sketches/color blocking for my own hand drawn art, it should be amazing for inspiration if you ever have art block and it'll cut down on the time it takes, at least for me, doing all the groundwork on a new piece and just get STARTED instead of trying to figure everything out
mm I agree I think the possibilities for AI works are massive and the are ways to use AI creatively. as well as making art more accessible if used as a tool
The core of the generation tools themselves *already* directly use the work of artists without their consent, it doesn't have to be trained on a specific artist's work. If you think models trained on specific artists are scummy (and yes, they are), consider what was used to make the root program.
Identity theft as it is
I think AI has its place. For the low-budget average person who wants to see their ideas visually represented but don't have the talent to draw themselves or have the money to commission someone, sure. But you demonstrated how professional artists will always have a place with how long you struggled to get what you were envisioning. AI prompts can only do so much, but talking and conversing with someone you can explain to will always win out. People will use commission artists to get exactly what they want and will be able to do minor tweaks to fit their vision. Studios and companies will still need professional artists for that one-on-one to get the product made in a timely manner .
Whenever something goes digital or automated, there is always the backlash that it's going to take away jobs. But that isn't always the fact. The human factor is always needed and sometimes the human touch is what's needed to make something better.
Apologies for the ramble.😉
Jazza makes me relax a bit with the whole "AI is taking over" thing
It should be used as a tool just the same as photoshop overlays/layer edits or specialty brushes (get Jazza's ULTIMATE BRUSH SET (not sponsored)). They're not cheats, they're tools; except this one is VERY powerful and we as artists shouldn't be afraid to adapt
YOLO jazz I love your stuff you inspired me to start drawing more
I would hate this new AI development if it wasn’t for you putting a good spin on it. These videos actually help me to have a more positive outlook on the future of art. Thank you.
I can't think of a better person to discuss AI art than Jazza. Great video.
Look the problem with AI is it takes ALREADY EXISTING ART and mashes them together, that means your art too jazza, ANY art on the internet can be used, it means a lot of artists can lose their job because why would someone pay for their unique style when they could grab an AI, Jazza you've got to realise that this could also affect you
He’s a RUclipsr… he doesn’t care.
Bruh.. he isn't living by doing commission art..
That's a stupid argument. That's like arguing that we should do away with computing devices and translation machines or else it's all doom and gloom for math majors and language majors. Sure, you can't hope to find sustainable employment just with primary school math and being able to read and write, anymore. But, mathematics, linguistics and related fields continue to flourish.
Are you going to go out of your way to pay exorbitant prices to hire a human translator to be able to navigate through a website that's in a foreign language? Are you going to lecture a shopowner to eschew calculators and hire someone to perform their daily computing and bookkeeping? Or how do you feel about digital art? Certainly, that must have put not an insignificant dent on older art forms and must have eaten into the bottomlines of many a traditional artists.
Doing away with all technological progress would automatically mean reducing the skill threshold and making a lot more people employable. So, should we all push society back to Stone Age or something?
Skill yourself for a different job to pay the bills. Everyone one else had to do it, so will the run-of-the-mill artists. Art as a field will continue to flourish and thrive. The jobs in the field will just look different than they do now.
im glad you help us make better prompts too
10:35 The one with the blue flowers and cowboy boots is my favourite.
I think what people forget about AI art is that it entirely relies on human input, not just with the software it’s self but these things wouldn’t function without actual artists to source from & creatives to literally train n edit it to do as they want, so I don’t exactly see it as a threat.
However, I do think their needs to be legality & permissions around sourcing material as it clearly steals from art uploaded online.
*Side note: by permissions I mean asking an artist to willingly sign up to train AI not forcing an artist to repeatedly opt out. (Fricken deviant art.🙃)
Your opponent’s Active Pokemlm is no Burned
This is so cool! The names could use some AI help 🤣
i love how he typed is no burn
Jazza would you not have been more satisfied if you made the adjustments to legs and head tops and eyes yourself? I just feel using it for more than a prompt is taking the fun of the creativity out of the process!
Ingitch: You opponent's Active Pokémon is no Burned.
Please do this again! Do it 10 more times! Do it 20! I don’t care I just want more this is so enjoyable to watch.