Common Law Case Analysis Part 1 of 2
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- Bill Thornton - Common Law Case Analysis Part 1 of 2
You can get his dvd videos that are well worth it from Dennis Whipple 1215.org/seminar/denniswhipple.htm
nationalliberty...
www.1215.org
Bill..You do a great job and thank you!
i know it is 4 hours long. but... I listened to the whole thing :)
Oh dear .
me too and will listen again..
@@Rockthatbodyyes!!!!. ❤❤😊
Fantastic, Thank you so much. I am hooked finally finding what I need.
They have taken these teachings out of our schools. I am extremely excited and have never wanted to learn the law before. Because it was not for me. It was against me. But this is our freedom and rights. Is there any time that yourself or anyone else may be in Kentucky any time for educational purposes? I want to get involved.
What happened to ‘ole Aurora anyhow? anyone know?
Perez John Thomas Mary Gonzalez Angela
That is not true...the "Plea Bargain" is to relieve you of the burdensome cost of "Self-Defense"..."Nolo Contender". No contest, is neither a plea of guilt, nor, a plea of innocence...and, it is unenforceable as a conviction.
Does he talk about any cases that he lost in here?
2:29:00 object to plea
Travis Heinze Bill has helped many people whom in the end did not listen to him 100% for whatever reason and went to jail for a long time.
As far as I know anyone who has listened to him completely and internalized the information has not lost. But as Bill would say "Define a win."
He's never won.
So if you take a plea with an inferior court, or statutory court, and thus validated their case, can you come back years later and try to vacate the decision of the court. Or have you screwed yourself from being able to go back to have it overturned, after you take a plea deal?
no statute of limitations in my court .. common law court always gets a remedy.. You can always Attempt it, and there are cases where a sovereign has backed out of an agreement and I quote, well paraphrase what the judge said "to not allow the sovereign ( Indian tribe in this case ) to not change its mind on his own prerogative, would turn the very concept of sovereignty on its head.. " its not very good form though, and what you SAY out loud, over rides anything you have on paper.. so you there are considerations.. They will move forward as normal.. some even threaten mental hospital if you claim you are not a person.. be prepared with law case law and any maxims that support your perspective..
@@leeburstroghm of the judge says your crazy for not being the person and pretty says 'if john doe is not here then a bench warrant go out for his arrest'....then you basically say for the record my honor is making an legal distinction between the living man present here and the legal person on the record...then waive your birth certificate saying do you have the person on the record I proof you got it'
I like that RUclips hasn’t placed a Wikipedia warning on the video. I guest Common Law is real and should return. I’m tired of paying all of these taxes for war.
Cry some more parasite
What was the outcome of this case? Was she released from Jail? What was the end result?
My best guess is this case went no where and the people on this videos are too old to continue this fight and or are already dead.
@@peopleofgodv.citizensofsat9096 you are kidding?
@@Rockthatbody that’s my guess. I haven’t seen any new content from Bill Thornton and his website has not been updated for several years now. I emailed him a few times as well but no response.
They drug me out of court when I objected to jurisdiction. First appearance
Depends on how you objected and in what context. First, there are times for objecting to jurisdiction, and times where that sort of thing is not heard or appropriate. Second, often, I see sovereign citizen crazies filing lawsuits and then objecting to jurisdiction. You can't do that. When you file a case, you "invoke" the Court's jurisdiction. In other words, you agree to it by filing there. As for criminal cases, jurisdiction usually isn't an issue. If you did what you're accused of doing in the state where you're going to court, the court has jurisdiction over you, period. Criminal jurisdiction is never a matter of consent. The court has it whether you like it or not.
@@deathtotruthers1 Wrong! You are incorrect. I have challenged jurisdiction on criminal cases and won..
The Blue Raven Details? What, specifically was your objection? How did the judge rule? What evidence of these jurisdictional rulings do you have? A case number? An order?
@@deathtotruthers1 Sure, Give me one sec..
"Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action." Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.
"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted."
Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F Supp. 150.
"The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven."
Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." and "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided."
Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2d 906, 910.
"Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal."
Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp., 478 So. 2d. 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)
"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist." Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389.
"There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215.
"The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction." Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416.
"A universal principle as old as the law is that a proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are a nullity and its judgment therein without effect either on person or property." Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732.
"Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void, ab initio."
In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846.
"Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27.
"Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is deprived of juris."
Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.
@@deathtotruthers1 So I played their game, served them a bill of particulars, Then in Discovery asked them to turn over all evidence to show forth that constitutional laws apply to me? they failed to answer, so I put in a motion to compel evidence, they didn't answer, then I finally challenged subject matter and personam jurisdiction. I called their bluff, the case was dismissed.
1:04:00
I am soaking this in. I wonder if there is a way, that you can set up your own court hearing. Have the judges and DA and whoever else wants to come, and establish a court of record, to create a court case file, that one of the people in this region, has established a knowledge in the county that they have no jurisdiction over the people unless given by those people, and ignorance of the law will vanish in this portion of society. And stand on the quote that "the law doesnt protect a man who slumbers in his rights".
LoneRangerz! 777 you have to open up a new case and you have to state your own rules of the court
@@chemitasteinmommyposted4059 man I want to so bad. And I am studying and recopying the chicago manual of style 16th edition, and referencing blacks law at the library. I'm studying and trying to learn the language. I will not go into it ignorant. This is a FREEMASON THICK region. I wish there was help for people like me so I can get everything right.
@@chemitasteinmommyposted4059 so when you say open up a case,..I am aware of going to the clerks office, and filing a claim to the court. But what I guess I'm just trying to say and figure, is what does this claim consist of? Is it just a claim to the facts of their frauds against me? And run it like that? Theyll for sure blow up my car.
Pure nonsense on every level
I don't see how any of these arguments will ever hold up in any American court.
This info is GOOD and True law, the real question you are concerned about is will those persons in office keep good law, and support it.. Local practice is so prominent that it becomes enforced as law, even though it is not.. Or that statutes and codes are synonymous with Law, which they are not.. What is the difference between Legal and Lawful? This is a Big ship, our systems of jurisprudence, and we people with our work, knowledge and fearlessness, are pecking away at this huge ship in an effort to CORRECT its course to one that is in support of True liberty and justice for all.. Justice in LAW not in Equity.. Correct, it is a battle of information and arrogant ignorance.. .that is the true battle.. Enlightening those who are stuck in the confines of " this is just how things are done here " with out knowing exactly why..
If you don't even imagine anything possibly educational for your taking frome the time you spent watching this extensive and detailed story and explaination, you are already sovereign and far above my corpus vessel in commerce bound with bonds and attachments of a third dimensional corpse, fictional dead slave. I seek freedom of a people.
and with your low IQ you never will.
Danimal1177. Y to understand this is, there are two laws, actually one law and not real law. Self v Rhay. Common law is only for we the people who created the constitution's, both federal and state. Read the bill of rights which is part of the constitution s. Pennsylvania bill of rights IV says they are our trustee and servant. North Carolina states that they are to do our bidding. Because we are over them. Noticed he states I'm one of the people. That is from the declaration of independence that shows the people created government and have authority over them.
I dont see how the agency get away with the shit they do either… believe what you want
so fucktarts is saying to file a lien against the judge-which will get you sent to jail.
Idk what makes u think a fkn judge cant be arrested but they definitely can especially if their breaking the law they swore to