Post Apocalypse Tech (Part 2: Innovation and Incentives)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 янв 2025

Комментарии • 17

  • @jasonwolfe4205
    @jasonwolfe4205  Месяц назад +3

    Let me know if you think the music is too loud or distracting. I'm in the experimentation phase and any respectful feedback, be it positive or negative, is always welcome.

    • @krzysztowbzymek8003
      @krzysztowbzymek8003 Месяц назад +1

      a bit loud but listenable

    • @ThechillABman
      @ThechillABman Месяц назад

      Same, just a little but too loud but I could hear it almost fine

    • @OldWhiteDaddy
      @OldWhiteDaddy Месяц назад

      Hate it like ur voice

    • @ironclad4451
      @ironclad4451 23 дня назад

      It’s a little loud, but also I think the more pressing issue, is the particular track is rather intense for what I would consider creative contemplation.

  • @bodansova2951
    @bodansova2951 Месяц назад +1

    Interesting take, i don't have much to add you covered most things revolve around a possible post apocalyptic world and how that would effect the use, maintenance and use of any remaining technology.
    And i agree, most likely the most maintained technology would probably that which is necessary for base survival.
    Everything more complex and or expensive to maintain, namely that which requires a fully functioning planetary economy would probably be hoarded away or flat out lost first.
    So yeah as you seed, mostly tech that is necessary for survival ( food production, electricity, medicine, simple communication, transportation and weapons ) would be preserved and maintained the most.
    And if our theoretical post industrial survivors are relay luck they will be able to maintain simple computers, but that is a big if.
    While more advanced luxury tech, ( high end computers, televisions, routers ) and such would be abandoned, hoarded by the powerful ( or tech cults ) or flat out scavenged to maintain more necessary tech.
    This all depend on what kind of "apocalypse" we are referring to.
    I don't know where i reed this, but i remember a story where someone tired to go and build a toaster fully on his own, long story short he managed to get 90% there, but he was not able to find a way to replicate the plastic housing.

  • @Stahlengel13
    @Stahlengel13 Месяц назад

    the part around 6:50 to say, 7:00, is what we see with the channel HTME, where he is attempting to rebuild from the stone age forward step by step

  • @krzysztowbzymek8003
    @krzysztowbzymek8003 Месяц назад +1

    I recently had a conversation with chatgdp about this and we agreed that in the scenario you mentioned it would take us about 200-2000 years to be in a similar place technologically. Ps: This nicest version assumes that we somehow managed to establish a stable space colony and there are a few enclaves left in the world concentrated around places like nuclear power plants or laboratories.

    • @cefalopodo5717
      @cefalopodo5717 Месяц назад

      total ai death

    • @krzysztowbzymek8003
      @krzysztowbzymek8003 Месяц назад

      @@cefalopodo5717 ia it's just a tool for now, using it is nothing to be ashamed of

    • @krzysztowbzymek8003
      @krzysztowbzymek8003 Месяц назад

      @@cefalopodo5717 ai is just a tool for now. there is nothing to be ashamed by using it

  • @ThechillABman
    @ThechillABman Месяц назад

    I'd like to inform you that there are people (I've purposefully surrounded myself with technically skilled people) that have the tools and equipment necessary to make bullets, and not just recycle them. The true bottle neck for bullets would be making the casing and bullet, as that requires machining tools and such. I only know of one person on RUclips that I know of that has that capability, I'll have to search him up again. So while I agree that in the early stages of a post apocalypse, the most powerful clans/groups would have the most advanced tech, small groups of rural peoples would also be at similar tech levels, now while very few, my circle of friends (a very rare group mind you) would absolutely push hard for technological development, we would figure out exactly how many hunters we need to sustain as many "scientists" as possible, thus ensuring our somewhat rapid technological growth.

    • @jasonwolfe4205
      @jasonwolfe4205  Месяц назад

      I'm aware of bullet-casting, case recycling and gunpowder manufacture. All of which will help sustain the existing stockpiles, but new replacement parts for the guns themselves (springs, barrels, locks, etc) all require micrometer precision (depending on the gun, obviously) and advanced steel alloys. So I suspect that after 100 years or so, assuming the world hasn't miraculously made a full recovery, most of the world will resemble the modern middle east or eastern Europe (Ukraine) in terms of their tech level: the most abundant/rugged pieces of modern hardware for the elites, and old black-powder weapons or even more privative tools (bows, slings, spears, etc) for the commoners.

    • @ThechillABman
      @ThechillABman Месяц назад

      @jasonwolfe4205 have you heard of khyber pass? They actually make guns, some of which are cursed or made of recycled parts but they do make guns, again though this is one place that absolutely would not be able to sustain a large military.