Audio 101: The different Saturation types and how they sound

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии • 43

  • @rohaxfx001
    @rohaxfx001 3 года назад +41

    Clean 1:44
    Tube 3:23
    Tape 6:07
    Transistor 7:41

  • @highclassbeats333
    @highclassbeats333 8 месяцев назад +2

    Great job bro 🔥 💯 👍

  • @yusufkun_
    @yusufkun_ 4 года назад +1

    thanks Tim

  • @powlobo.m.b.
    @powlobo.m.b. 3 года назад

    great explanation and comparison!

  • @WyattBrown377
    @WyattBrown377 2 года назад +5

    The Kush Omega 458a plugin you used for transistor saturation doesn't actually emulate transistors! It emulates tubes and transformers. What you probably meant to use was the Kush TWK which does indeed emulate transistors.

  • @briancase6180
    @briancase6180 3 года назад +1

    Kazrog true iron for transformer saturation. Black box HG-2MS for tube. Wow, both are great. Big Al and Phil's cascade are good options too. Distressor/arouser for compression units.

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  3 года назад +2

      Kazrog makes killer stuff and is a nice dude! PA of course makes great plugins too.

  • @godawg1023
    @godawg1023 3 года назад +1

    This was extremely helpful!

  • @LetsDoThePhilippines
    @LetsDoThePhilippines 4 года назад +1

    Great job on explaining and showing how saturation works and affects the transients! :)

  • @marsrivers
    @marsrivers 2 года назад +1

    Redlight is trully a Gem

  • @newguy6935
    @newguy6935 3 года назад +3

    Very helpful video. As I am studying this topic now, can you tell me what the differences are between distortion, saturation, and exciters? Kinda confused by all this and having a little trouble getting the answers. Also, while I was aware that saturation "thickened" the audio, I wasn't aware that it lessened the transients. Very helpful seeing those waveforms imposed on each other.

  • @matthewjones8510
    @matthewjones8510 4 года назад +1

    Tim always does such a good job

  • @sevenhxrecords677
    @sevenhxrecords677 4 года назад +1

    Thanks bro...great video

  • @alanbangura7949
    @alanbangura7949 3 года назад

    This explanation was awesome!

  • @digitalstudiosystem9556
    @digitalstudiosystem9556 6 месяцев назад

    Una demo sulle voci?

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  6 месяцев назад +1

      I can work on a video showing how they effect voices! Stay tuned and be sure to subscribe!

  • @TheVeksha
    @TheVeksha 3 года назад +1

    transformer or transistor?

  • @campar1043
    @campar1043 3 года назад

    If I’m not mistaken this is also soft clipping(except transistor?)which helps tame transients which lowers the peak volumes but increases perceived loudness which in turn helps with a louder sound master that’s not so crushed ?

    • @TransistorLSD
      @TransistorLSD Год назад +1

      Every saturation/distortion also soft-clips the signal. Different terms, same thing.

    • @campar1043
      @campar1043 Год назад

      @@TransistorLSD saturation also adds harmonics whereas clipping doesn’t?

    • @TransistorLSD
      @TransistorLSD Год назад +1

      @@campar1043 Clipping also adds harmonics. Clipping & saturation & distortion - different words for the exact same thing.

    • @campar1043
      @campar1043 Год назад

      @@TransistorLSD oh I thought clipping was exclusively rounding off transients

  • @JMBvideo
    @JMBvideo 10 месяцев назад +2

    Except its all digital. (Not real tubes)

  • @jupiteraloha
    @jupiteraloha 4 года назад

    Good video, explanation and everything. The comparison of the waveforms at the end, very illustrative, thank you very much. I have a question, what is the difference between a saturator and an aural exciter?

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  4 года назад +1

      You're very welcome! An aural exciter generally hypes up the high end of a signal. Depending on the unit used, it can do this with mulitband dynamics on the high end, high end saturation or a number of other methods.

    • @jupiteraloha
      @jupiteraloha 4 года назад

      @@TimTalksAudio Great!, thank you very much Tim.

  • @bassaroo
    @bassaroo 4 года назад

    Thanks, Tim - very helpful! One question I have is how did you get the Kush plugins to work properly in Studio One? I was demoing the four you mentioned and was really in love with them - especially the N and the A, then there was a huge blast of sound. I quit the program and restarted my computer, but the program crashed every time I tried to open that session. I was only able to open the session after deleting all the Kush plugins from my Mac's library (Running Catalina). Maybe you're on Studio One 5 (I'm on 4). Really hoping I can get those Kush to work for me! Thanks!

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  4 года назад

      You may need to upgrade. I am running S1v5, and I was using the AU version of the plugins (on Mac) so you may want to try the VST2 versions as well. They should be compatible with v4 too though.

    • @bassaroo
      @bassaroo 4 года назад

      Tim Talks Audio Thanks for the reply, Tim! You know, good point about the AU plugins - I didn't even think of that. I've only used the different VST versions every time I use plugins - maybe that's the problem?... Do you always use the AU versions of plugins? Is there any problem with "mix and match" using VSTs and AU in the same session? Cheers!

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  4 года назад +1

      No, I don't always use the AU version of plugins. My "usual" series goes VST3, then AU, then VST2. I just keep track of how my system preforms with "that" version of a plugin. If i'm getting issues, I switch to another "style". I'll have to do more research to see if there's any differences in plugin format other then containers and compatibility. And of course you can mix and match! What ever works best on your system!

    • @bassaroo
      @bassaroo 4 года назад

      Tim Talks Audio Thanks, Tim - I appreciate your reply.

  • @AceKxld
    @AceKxld 2 года назад

    You kinda remind me of The manager on Dave FX

  • @ayoubthegreat
    @ayoubthegreat 2 года назад

    FYI. this video was normalized to -6.1 db under "stats for nerds" so you could use that info on future videos.

  • @ye_boi
    @ye_boi 3 года назад +3

    I'm deaf, can't notice any difference :(

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  3 года назад

      make sure to listen on headphones or studio monitors. It is subtle, but there are differences.

    • @redkay7969
      @redkay7969 2 года назад

      me neighter

  • @AuddityHipHop
    @AuddityHipHop Год назад

    am i the only one who can never hear saturation unless its distorting the track?

    • @TimTalksAudio
      @TimTalksAudio  Год назад +1

      As you slowly add in the saturation, listen for the mids of the track to start to add thickness! Saturation can also sometimes because adding harmonics because of how the process works and what it's doing! Maybe I'll make a video just on listening for saturation/other effects, thanks for the suggestion.