I've wanted to trust your opinion and this new brand so I've bought both the PA02 and the Anvil (even because of 11.11 sales😜). And to tell the thruth I'm experimenting this price range IEMS witch often has very little to envy compared to more expensive ones.
The Anvil 114 has a mid-bass focused bass with a solid slam, while the Explorer’s bass rumbles more and stands out in the mix. Both have awesome bass that really stands out. The Explorer has a more relaxed treble.
This is an excellent review, given the detailed description and comparisons to the Aful 5+2 and the previous Pula. This kind of information helps me make an informed decision. Given your review, I will choose the Pula over the Aful 5+2, which is difficult as I'm very loyal to the Aful brand. Again, this is a sign that you did an excellent job with your review. I have one bit of production feedback: Reduce the amount of hand movement so you're not knocking the IEMs around on the table. Also, please don't hold the IEMs while moving your hands. It is very distracting to watch. It would help if you considered leaving the IEMs on the table and pointing to them when drawing out informational detail unless you're referring to a specific physical feature on the IEM.
Hi friend, I was planning to buy the Hidiz Mp145 to listen to music (Nu Metal, Metal, Rock) and to use it in the 3.5mm jack of the steam deck, as it has an excellent soundstage, but I just saw that they speak wonders of the Pula Anvil 114, and I think it can also meet the need I have for a iem to listen to music and play (The Witcher, Doom, Zelda, only campaign mode games, no multiplayer shooter), you recommend me? Mp145 ($100) or the Pula Anvil 114 ($160) I hope you can help me decide between those 2.
Nice review.Finally tunings are getting more mature and less excessive.There were too many pointless ones.I wish the fit issue improves as well still we need improvement.P7 and Anvil are a sidegrade or downgrade vs studio4 ?( I love strong instr.separation..)
Thanks. The Studio 4 still has the best detail and instrument separation of the three. However, the P7 and Anvil 114 outperform it in a few areas. For example, the P7 has more bass, while the Anvil 114 has stronger bass, richer mid-range texture, and a unique soundstage. Overall, I consider the Studio 4 an upgrade over the P7 and Anvil in many aspects, but not when it comes to bass or soundstage.
@Gizaudio Thanks for the analytical answer.I wonder why they don t make a second version with a tad more bass.This new colour should be a new tuning too
What would you suggest for me to upgrade from my Aria? The original black ones! I need a new set, and this sale is too good! I can't decide, though, so many options lol
Decisions, decisions... 11.11 will be very contended. Just a question since I never really experienced a bone conduction driven IEM: does that BC propagates the vibrations through tips' silicon or the entire shell? How much does the fit (and the tips quality themselves) affects the final response? I've seen that you need to have a really snug and sturdy fit into your ear to get the best of it, but I usually settle with CP145 or Spring Tips depending on the IEM (whose domes are soft) - do you think it could be troublesome in any way? I'm very hyped but I'm a little bit concerned about it since I don't know what to expect, I'm almost convinced to give the Anvil the edge over the P5+2 although as a first look I think I could like the Aful's frequency response more (not a graph sniffer in any way, but still), just want to be reassured :) Also, do you think that the Anvil would benefit from the BC in gaming scenarios? Does it truly add a better sense of space that actually translates into good accuracy at spacial positioning and a nice holographic sound, or it's just a "fun gimmick" as a musical and entertaining quirk that doesn't add extra detail or precision? Thanks in advance! Coming from the CKLVX D41 I already know they probably are a good improvement, but I want to carefully evaluate all aspects in detail to get the clearest possible idea of what to expect from them :)
If I had to guess, I’d say the bone conduction driver works through the part closer to the nozzle. I believe this because, even with a very shallow insertion, I can still hear the bone conduction effect. The impact on mid-range texture and soundstage is noticeable even with a shallow fit, so you don’t need a specific fit for it to work. The soundstage on the Anvil is more spacious than the P7, but the imaging isn’t necessarily more precise. The P7 still excels in precision. I think the Anvil's soundstage will make the experience more enjoyable and immersive, but it won’t offer more precision than an IEM like the P7.
@90enemies I own DMA. It is great. Very addictive. Very comfy too. Can sleep with them. Has great quality BA's and overall sound. Sonion for mids and Knowles for high. 2 x Sonion BC and a Nickel 9.2mm DD that sounds full and liquid. Love it to bits. I wonder about the quality of the drivers used in the Pula Anvil in comparison. DMA is more expensive due to brands used. Does is still mean the sound quality is higher still, or does Pula close the gap?
@@JRVick Actually now that you mentioned that. Do you also own the S12 2024 or have demoed it? How would that compare to the DMA if you have listened to the S12 24. Since those are currently my daily Drivers.
@@Gizaudiooh ok. I haven't looked into that one. My go too is the Shanling Me600 right now. I was looking to go up to the TSMR shock but I just don't know if I can justify that $600 price tag. But I'd either like to go with the Pula or even the QOA Adonis New.
I wonder about the effect of BCD on measurement rigs. The way this driver works might require a different interpretation of the frequency graph we see. Also, this driver seems to need a lot of power to work properly.
I have the Xenns Tea Pro and love it very much. I was gonna get the Aful P 5+2 and use it as a travel/commute set since it looks like a somewhat similar set. Now you got my attention, should I just get the Anvil for something different then lol
I listen to and love those bands. The P7 has better fit and comfort, with deeper sub-bass and more detailed treble. It’s very detailed with excellent separation. The Anvil, on the other hand, has stronger mid-bass impact, richer texture in the mid-range (like guitar strums and vocals), and a better soundstage. The biggest difference, though, comes from the bone conduction driver. That’s what truly sets it apart.
I wonder if the soundstage feel exagerated of this pula for gaming purposes. The 7hz timeless had that wide presentation but it came at the cost of inaccuracy for this usecase making it not a good choice for gaming.
Yeah, it’s a bit more than usual, so it’s super immersive and fun, but it can feel a bit exaggerated compared to other IEMs. The imaging is pretty spot-on, though.
It’s fantastic for EDM, with a strong mid-bass impact that really hits. While it does have sub-bass that adds some rumble, the focus is more on the mid-bass.
So, weird question/comparison Axel but hear me out: would you prefer this to Softears Studio4? Let me explain, for a lot of people me included it feels smack dab in the middle of price/quality ratio (while being absolutely beastly and awesome), you get good bass, awesome extension, wide and swirly soundstage, tooons of details but no sharpness, totally competes with 700$ sets. It just not “very fun” as in not very dynamic and could be slightly boring (very correct). The anvil seems to have it all and using this kind of tribrids setup seems to give it the edge in terms of special sauce, which the studio4 seems couldn’t attain with just (great quality) BAs. So if I’m not too wrong this could be some sort of upgrade or replacement to what the S4 did to the market in its time
Interesting comparison! Personally, I prefer the Studio 4, even over more expensive IEMs, simply out of preference. What I love about it is its natural, neutral sound, which provides an accurate listening experience. That said, the PULA Anvil is definitely more fun and enjoyable, and it outperforms the Studio 4 in a few areas, like bass, mid-range texture, and soundstage. The bone conduction driver is the special sauce that makes the Anvil stand out.
@ I see what you mean. I also always gets impress by how natural they sound. So I guess one could say they are complimentary, and my wallet isn’t happy 😂
I’m focused on the end result which is the sound itself. But if you specifically want Knowles or Sonion drivers, there are other excellent IEMs with those. 🙂
Hi, I follow you and I trust your words. I need your help, Davinci or Tanchjim Origin, which is the better purchase. I want to upgrade because I already have Meze Alba, Kato, Ikko oh10, Aria 1 and Aful Explorer. I listen mostly to jazz and a little soul, funk, fusion, chill..mostly means music without vocals. Thank you, happy work
The DaVinci has significantly more bass than the Tanchjim Origin, which is likely the biggest deciding factor between the two. The DaVinci’s added bass brings a fun, immersive quality to the music and adds depth, especially for instruments like cellos, drums, male vocals, and bass guitars. However, you might prefer the Origin’s lighter bass response, which keeps the focus on the vocals and mid-range, delivering just enough low-end for a balanced sound. The Origin's tuning enhances vocal clarity, making it a better choice for female vocals. Additionally, the DaVinci has a modular cable and a wider range of accessories.
If only it did sub bass 🥲. Seems a very interesting iem, never really thought about bone conduction drivers before but making it sound more real makes sense.
If this goes good with j-pop and female vocals, I'll get it for 11.11, like immediately.
It sounds fantastic with both male and female vocals. Very extended female vocals. Enjoy your music!
Thanks for your comparison with the P5+2, I have the PULA incoming, can't wait for it.
You're welcome.
Nice review, thanks! I just got the Penon Fan 3 with BC driver and they sound great. Now I'm interested in this set, very nice value package.
Thanks for watching.
Sounds like a winner to me 😊 I think I will order it on November 11th
I just ordered it and excited to pair it with my DX240 paired with a custom, excellent sounding AMP8MKII.
The variation of the plates are soooo beautiful, lucky u
I love Pula02 for its open sound stage but wished base decayed slower. This maybe a perfect upgrade. On order.
If they are any metal heads here just get the pula anvil they are really nice with metal, very fun and detailed
Does it have that good mid bass thump? All I listen to is metal honestly.
@@roguegorilla8981it's nice, but the estrella is better to my ears better for metal a bit more fatiguing though
@@fabien4489I have the doscino so I passed one the Estrella. I prefer the Shanling Me600 over it even.
I may be getting these. If there is a discount during 11:11 on these 20 to 30 dollars its a go!
Subbed! Thanks for this review! Waiting for 11.11. I enjoy pa02 alot.
Thanks for the sub.
If this ever comes to Romania it's gonna be hilarious (look up what pula means in Romanian)
😂
😅
nah 😂💀
I've wanted to trust your opinion and this new brand so I've bought both the PA02 and the Anvil (even because of 11.11 sales😜). And to tell the thruth I'm experimenting this price range IEMS witch often has very little to envy compared to more expensive ones.
Enter the Bone Zone
Now with Pula
Sounds like some gay adult movie from the 80's.
Vampire survivors???
😅@@hartyewh1
How is the bass presentation compared to the aful explorer ?
I like tight/tactile bass with no harsh emphasized cymbals
The Anvil 114 has a mid-bass focused bass with a solid slam, while the Explorer’s bass rumbles more and stands out in the mix. Both have awesome bass that really stands out. The Explorer has a more relaxed treble.
This is an excellent review, given the detailed description and comparisons to the Aful 5+2 and the previous Pula. This kind of information helps me make an informed decision. Given your review, I will choose the Pula over the Aful 5+2, which is difficult as I'm very loyal to the Aful brand. Again, this is a sign that you did an excellent job with your review.
I have one bit of production feedback: Reduce the amount of hand movement so you're not knocking the IEMs around on the table. Also, please don't hold the IEMs while moving your hands. It is very distracting to watch. It would help if you considered leaving the IEMs on the table and pointing to them when drawing out informational detail unless you're referring to a specific physical feature on the IEM.
Thanks for the feedback! I’ll stop the handwaving in the future, haha.
Hi friend, I was planning to buy the Hidiz Mp145 to listen to music (Nu Metal, Metal, Rock) and to use it in the 3.5mm jack of the steam deck, as it has an excellent soundstage, but I just saw that they speak wonders of the Pula Anvil 114, and I think it can also meet the need I have for a iem to listen to music and play (The Witcher, Doom, Zelda, only campaign mode games, no multiplayer shooter), you recommend me? Mp145 ($100) or the Pula Anvil 114 ($160) I hope you can help me decide between those 2.
I haven’t heard the MP145, so I can’t comment on its sound. But I will say, if you’re after an immersive soundstage, the Anvil 114 is a great choice.
I just saw this one on linsoul and here we have the review 🎉
Are you sure it was on linsoul? i can't find it there
🎉
Nice review.Finally tunings are getting more mature and less excessive.There were too many pointless ones.I wish the fit issue improves as well still we need improvement.P7 and Anvil are a sidegrade or downgrade vs studio4 ?( I love strong instr.separation..)
Thanks. The Studio 4 still has the best detail and instrument separation of the three. However, the P7 and Anvil 114 outperform it in a few areas. For example, the P7 has more bass, while the Anvil 114 has stronger bass, richer mid-range texture, and a unique soundstage. Overall, I consider the Studio 4 an upgrade over the P7 and Anvil in many aspects, but not when it comes to bass or soundstage.
@Gizaudio Thanks for the analytical answer.I wonder why they don t make a second version with a tad more bass.This new colour should be a new tuning too
Interested to hear how this compares to the Fan 3.
What would you suggest for me to upgrade from my Aria? The original black ones! I need a new set, and this sale is too good! I can't decide, though, so many options lol
Hi Axel do you have a IEM tier list?
kick me if there is a link
I have 2 old links to excel
6:40 so it sounds bigger? Thats awesome. Reminds me of my og Timeless.
Yes.
Decisions, decisions... 11.11 will be very contended. Just a question since I never really experienced a bone conduction driven IEM: does that BC propagates the vibrations through tips' silicon or the entire shell? How much does the fit (and the tips quality themselves) affects the final response? I've seen that you need to have a really snug and sturdy fit into your ear to get the best of it, but I usually settle with CP145 or Spring Tips depending on the IEM (whose domes are soft) - do you think it could be troublesome in any way? I'm very hyped but I'm a little bit concerned about it since I don't know what to expect, I'm almost convinced to give the Anvil the edge over the P5+2 although as a first look I think I could like the Aful's frequency response more (not a graph sniffer in any way, but still), just want to be reassured :)
Also, do you think that the Anvil would benefit from the BC in gaming scenarios? Does it truly add a better sense of space that actually translates into good accuracy at spacial positioning and a nice holographic sound, or it's just a "fun gimmick" as a musical and entertaining quirk that doesn't add extra detail or precision? Thanks in advance!
Coming from the CKLVX D41 I already know they probably are a good improvement, but I want to carefully evaluate all aspects in detail to get the clearest possible idea of what to expect from them :)
If I had to guess, I’d say the bone conduction driver works through the part closer to the nozzle. I believe this because, even with a very shallow insertion, I can still hear the bone conduction effect. The impact on mid-range texture and soundstage is noticeable even with a shallow fit, so you don’t need a specific fit for it to work.
The soundstage on the Anvil is more spacious than the P7, but the imaging isn’t necessarily more precise. The P7 still excels in precision. I think the Anvil's soundstage will make the experience more enjoyable and immersive, but it won’t offer more precision than an IEM like the P7.
How deep is the fit for the Pula Anvil..?
I got a nice, deep fit with it, but I’ve got big ears.
Bro which is a better deal?the pila anvil for 176$ or the aful p5+2 for 224$?
Bone conduction addiction. 😅 Great review. Would like ro know how it stacks up to the BGVP DMA.
Had the same thought lol. I was really eyeing the DMA.
@90enemies I own DMA. It is great. Very addictive. Very comfy too. Can sleep with them. Has great quality BA's and overall sound. Sonion for mids and Knowles for high. 2 x Sonion BC and a Nickel 9.2mm DD that sounds full and liquid. Love it to bits. I wonder about the quality of the drivers used in the Pula Anvil in comparison. DMA is more expensive due to brands used. Does is still mean the sound quality is higher still, or does Pula close the gap?
Would be interesting to see someone compare them.
@@JRVick Actually now that you mentioned that. Do you also own the S12 2024 or have demoed it? How would that compare to the DMA if you have listened to the S12 24. Since those are currently my daily Drivers.
@90enemies no S12 for me, so i can't tell.
how does it compares with penon fan3 that also has a BC ?
I haven’t tried the Penon Fan 3, so I can’t comment on its sound.
Its considerably more affordable than the p5+2, wish it had more subbass
Please mention the price of the product in the first five minutes of the video.
Google is your friend and takes 15 seconds.
Thanks for the feedback.
For rock and metal music?
I listen to a lot of rock and metal, and it sounds absolutely fantastic with those genres.
@@Gizaudiowhat would be your top iem
pick for metal?
@@roguegorilla8981 AFUL Explorer.
@@Gizaudiooh ok. I haven't looked into that one. My go too is the Shanling Me600 right now. I was looking to go up to the TSMR shock but I just don't know if I can justify that $600 price tag. But I'd either like to go with the Pula or even the QOA Adonis New.
How does this compare to BGVP DMA? which have 2 less BA but 1 more BC driver and 100 bucks more expensive.
haven’t listened to the BGVP DMA, so I can’t comment on its sound. Would be interesting to see someone compare them.
I wonder about the effect of BCD on measurement rigs. The way this driver works might require a different interpretation of the frequency graph we see. Also, this driver seems to need a lot of power to work properly.
It's very easy to drive, even with a 3.5mm connection, similar to most IEMs.
The pa02 fit me better than any other iem I've ever tried. Does the anvil offer a similar fit?
While the Anvil is very comfortable, the PA02 has a better fit simply because it’s smaller.
I have the Xenns Tea Pro and love it very much. I was gonna get the Aful P 5+2 and use it as a travel/commute set since it looks like a somewhat similar set. Now you got my attention, should I just get the Anvil for something different then lol
ok
Both are great IEMs, but they offer different sound signatures. If you want to try a bone conduction driver, go for the PULA Anvil.
@ ordered the anvil from Taobao. The owner even gave me a good discount. This will be my first bone conductor IEM. Excited
Are these more detailed than Tanchjim Origin?
would the P7 or Anvil be better for rock? e.g. Guns and Roses, Queens of the Stone Age, The Who, Rage Against the Machine etc.?
I listen to and love those bands.
The P7 has better fit and comfort, with deeper sub-bass and more detailed treble. It’s very detailed with excellent separation.
The Anvil, on the other hand, has stronger mid-bass impact, richer texture in the mid-range (like guitar strums and vocals), and a better soundstage. The biggest difference, though, comes from the bone conduction driver. That’s what truly sets it apart.
@Gizaudio thanks for the great comparison
How's the timbre on this?
Fairly natural.
I wonder if the soundstage feel exagerated of this pula for gaming purposes.
The 7hz timeless had that wide presentation but it came at the cost of inaccuracy for this usecase making it not a good choice for gaming.
Yeah, it’s a bit more than usual, so it’s super immersive and fun, but it can feel a bit exaggerated compared to other IEMs. The imaging is pretty spot-on, though.
yeah iem companies are stepping up! double flange FTW ! omg, i was going to be fine this 11/11 and not buy anything. i think i must now! dang it!
If I have Performer 5+2, does it make sense to purchase PULA Anvil ?
I think both IEMs sound different enough to stand out and complement each other. So yes.
@@Gizaudio Thank you. So time to place the order :-). By the way, have you had a chance to test latest JUZEAR Dragonfly 81T?
@@mariusz_kozlowski Yes. I prefer the Anvil.
Never tried a bone conductor driver IEM… Dynamic contrasting sounding 🤔
Yes, the sound is very engaging. The bass, mid-range, and treble all capture your attention.
@ thanks for the clarification 😃
Is it vented?
Yes.
It looks amazing but how is it for EDM? I like my subbass!
so PA02 has more subbass.... eh now I'm not sure the Anvil will be bassy enough for me :(
Again, it looks like maybe the Anvil bass is more akin to the H60? plenty of midbass with slightly less sub
It’s fantastic for EDM, with a strong mid-bass impact that really hits. While it does have sub-bass that adds some rumble, the focus is more on the mid-bass.
So, weird question/comparison Axel but hear me out: would you prefer this to Softears Studio4?
Let me explain, for a lot of people me included it feels smack dab in the middle of price/quality ratio (while being absolutely beastly and awesome), you get good bass, awesome extension, wide and swirly soundstage, tooons of details but no sharpness, totally competes with 700$ sets. It just not “very fun” as in not very dynamic and could be slightly boring (very correct).
The anvil seems to have it all and using this kind of tribrids setup seems to give it the edge in terms of special sauce, which the studio4 seems couldn’t attain with just (great quality) BAs. So if I’m not too wrong this could be some sort of upgrade or replacement to what the S4 did to the market in its time
Interesting comparison! Personally, I prefer the Studio 4, even over more expensive IEMs, simply out of preference. What I love about it is its natural, neutral sound, which provides an accurate listening experience. That said, the PULA Anvil is definitely more fun and enjoyable, and it outperforms the Studio 4 in a few areas, like bass, mid-range texture, and soundstage. The bone conduction driver is the special sauce that makes the Anvil stand out.
@ I see what you mean. I also always gets impress by how natural they sound. So I guess one could say they are complimentary, and my wallet isn’t happy 😂
does bone conduction can produce deep bass?
I'm not sure if the bone conduction affects the bass, but I can say that it delivers deep bass.
Easy buy...
This or Zigaat Odyssey??
I haven’t listened to the Odyssey, so I can’t comment on its sound.
More spacious than pilgrim?
Yes.
your microphone sounds grainy, not a good fit for a iem channel ;)
Thanks for the feedback! I’ve upgraded the mic, and the issue is with the gain. I’ll get that fixed. Thanks again!
Only concern is BAs aint knowles or sonions
I’m focused on the end result which is the sound itself. But if you specifically want Knowles or Sonion drivers, there are other excellent IEMs with those. 🙂
Please stop using Harman IE :(
Why?
Hi, I follow you and I trust your words. I need your help, Davinci or Tanchjim Origin, which is the better purchase. I want to upgrade because I already have Meze Alba, Kato, Ikko oh10, Aria 1 and Aful Explorer. I listen mostly to jazz and a little soul, funk, fusion, chill..mostly means music without vocals. Thank you, happy work
The DaVinci has significantly more bass than the Tanchjim Origin, which is likely the biggest deciding factor between the two. The DaVinci’s added bass brings a fun, immersive quality to the music and adds depth, especially for instruments like cellos, drums, male vocals, and bass guitars. However, you might prefer the Origin’s lighter bass response, which keeps the focus on the vocals and mid-range, delivering just enough low-end for a balanced sound. The Origin's tuning enhances vocal clarity, making it a better choice for female vocals. Additionally, the DaVinci has a modular cable and a wider range of accessories.
@Gizaudio Please, is there an obvious difference to me as a hobbyist between Kato and Origin, because I already have Kato...thanks
If only it did sub bass 🥲. Seems a very interesting iem, never really thought about bone conduction drivers before but making it sound more real makes sense.
Yeah.... Why no rumble😢
The sub-bass is present and does rumble, though it's clearly not as pronounced as the mid-bass.