Gerald Undone - Camera Reviews Need to Change - REACTION

Navigating the PR world for a RUclipsr is difficult, but is Gerald too far removed from the hustle of newcomers to relate? #LumixS9 #Lumix #techyoutuber
New Geek Merch - my-store-f8d54...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @grantedgeek

[@alisonclarke1127]

Keep up the good work on your videos ❤❤❤❤ I’ll be watching you are the best buddy ❤️ I miss you so much and I can’t wait for us to hang out more

[@angeloplayforone]

The base problem of Gerald Undone and all You Tubers is that their revenue comes from clicks, so you need to create video for clicks. He seems to think he is the gatekeeper of the camera community. He is not a videographer or photographer so his reviews are based on technology but not scientific based. With cameras one feature can be valuable to one but not to others. So all review based only on features does not take user case into consideration. So you cannot conclude on this basis that a product is bad or good. As many has said on their reply to Gerald. There are no bad cameras released the last 5 years. Some are targeting a user case that it is not yours but it will not make it bad. For instance OM Systems focus on wildlife and birds photography and less on video. This does not make their cameras bad simply because you are focusing on video or if you are a wedding or potrait photographer.
Another problem of Gerald video came after he has not been invited to Lumix event. They said to him that he may not like the cameras. Simply he has to understand he is not the target audience. Besides that many who replied to him said that manufacturers wants feedback during those events and Gerald does not review does cameras on site, so he can’t give feedback. So less valuable at such events, which the manufacturer pays the cost.
Many replies he got from his video was negative. Many disagreed with him such as Tony Northrup and Dan Watson. The best replied was from Robin Wong on his blogspot at robinwong.blogspot. He said if you are not invited then you are not important as you think you are. His video was simply to ventilate his frustration against Lumix.

[@angeloplayforone]

The base problem of Gerald Undone and all You Tubers is that their revenue comes from clicks, so you need to create video for clicks. He seems to think he is the gatekeeper of the camera community. He is not a videographer or photographer so his reviews are based on technology but not scientific based. With cameras one feature can be valuable to one but not to others. So all review based only on features does not take user case into consideration. So you cannot conclude on this basis that a product is bad or good. As many has said on their reply to Gerald. There are no bad cameras released the last 5 years. Some are targeting a user case that it is not yours but it will make it bad. For instance OM Systems focus on wildlife and birds photography and less on video. This does not make their cameras bad simply because you are focusing on video or if you are a wedding or potrait photographer.
Another problem of Gerald video came after he has not been invited to Lumix event. They said to him that he may not like the cameras. Simply he has to understand he is not the target audience. Besides that many who replied to him said that manufacturers wants feedback during those events and Gerald does not review does cameras on site, so he can’t give feedback. So less valuable at such events, which the manufacturer pays the cost.
Many replies he got from his video was negative. Many disagreed with him such as Tony Northrup and Dan Watson. The best replied was from Robin Wong on his blogspot at robinwong.blogspot. He said if you are not invited then you are not important as you think you are. His video was simply to ventilate his frustration against Lumix.