Great old camera, Aly. Thanks for sharing so much information about its history. And thanks for helping to keep film alive. Wonderful shots as examples.
I really love my much younger Rolleiflex Mx-Evs, and I loved how deep you dug on the history of the company. Learned a lot of new things. I think I will try and date my Rolleiflex now. Thanks for the inspiration.
Love those black and whites. Amazing it still takes such good images. I've got a 3.5 Rolleiflex with a Planar lens and two Rolleicords. Interesting history.
That is a great bit of history. The oldest camera that I have is a Kodak Autographic from 1916. I did shoot a roll of film in it using a 116 to 120 adapter. The oldest camera that I regularly shoot with is a Leica iii from 1939.
My oldest camera that I've shot with is my father's Argus C3 from about 1948. My most used is a Hasselblad 500C which is from 1967. I have an Exakta Varex VX and a Voightlander Vitessa both from the early 1950"s but they both have issues that make them difficult to use.
Stunning results with the colour and that old lens! While I don't have an OG Rolleiflex, I use my Rolleiflex 2.8F often. As for my oldest camera, I have a 1915 Canadian-made Kodak No. 2 Hawk-Eye Model C, which takes 120 film and is made of thick cardboard for the outside body, and super thin plate steel for the interior.
That’s awesome Alex. Especially that it takes 120 film. That’s surprising to me. Was it adapted to take 120 or was 120 available that early? I can’t remember.
Nice to see you out and about 😊 Dusting off the shelf queens and seeing what they can do can be very rewarding. I just got back from Tennessee (and bought way too many cameras) and working through a “New to Me” batch of war era folding cameras and lenses. I really should think about getting my blog out of the dirt and dust it off, showing my collection like you have. Currently I’m just posting on IG and Grainy.
I just love 1930s cameras! If i may a little correction. 35mm film in 1929 was still a novelty in photogrpahy. Commercially only used by Leica at that time but still did not built up steam. That hapened after 1930. Also the 135 format first appeared in 1934 with the first Kodak Retina. As for the Compur shutters of that era, are easy enough to work on, and built to last forever. Ι worked on probably more than 100 of them. But of course you can not expect to unearth one after 50 or more years and hope to function as they should. If you are interested you can check about the reassembly of a Compur shutter to my Old Standard Rolleiflex or Welta Weltix video in my channel. Keep it up!
Wow, awesome video, awesome camera and awesome photos! I like to think I know a lot about film photography, since I was a hobbyist back in the 1970s and, well, film photography was all we had. But I sure learned a lot from you today. I had no idea that the original Rolleiflex used 620 film instead of 120, and I didn't even known that there had ever been a 117 roll film. I also didn't know that the original Rolleiflex lacked a crank (in later years, the crank was the most obvious difference between a Rolleiflex and a Rolleicord), and I had always thought "Synchro Compur" was some sort of internal branding for Franke & Heidecke, kind of like "Hydra-Matic" is an automatic transmission made for GM cars. Now I find myself wondering what other cameras had Compur shutters. I guess it's never too late to learn something new -- or old, in this case. 🙃 Your mention of the lack of coating on your original Rolleiflex's lenses left me thinking that you might be the first person ever to shoot a roll of color in that particular camera. My few minutes worth of Google research suggests that your camera was built before general purpose color roll film was available. Even if that wasn't the case, your camera was almost certainly built with just b&w film in mind, as color photography wasn't popular among the masses until sometime in the 1960s due to higher cost, lower reliability and shorter print life. The oldest camera I can remember shooting with were my grandpa's Kodak Holiday Brownie, which could have been made anytime from 1953 to 1962, but was probably bought closer to 1953 as that's when my mom and her sisters were in those childhood years when parents want to take snapshots of them. The first "real" camera I used was my dad's Rolleiflex, which I'm pretty sure was purchased new in 1956. Hopefully one of my brothers still has it. Fun fact: When I started shopping for my own SLR back in 1979, I really wanted a Rolleiflex SLR, because I had enjoyed Dad's Rolleiflex TLR so much and I knew what a high-quality camera it was. Alas, Rollei only had one line of SLRs available at the time, the Rolleiflex SL35. It was reportedly well-built and took fine photos, but it was heavy and clumsy to use, and expensive to boot. It was also completely devoid of any electronics, which I know many people view (both then and now) as a good thing, but one of the reasons I was buying a new camera at the time was that I wanted some automation to help me get more action shots, so, alas, the Rolleiflex SL35 didn't qualify. I ended up spending about $350 for my Minolta XG-1 outfit, which included the body, normal lens, case, wide neck strap and a bunch of other useful accessories. That same amount would have bought just the Rolleiflex SL35M body (I think that was the least expensive variant at the time) and the f1.4 normal lens I wanted. I guess I could get one now if I really wanted one badly enough -- there seem to be plenty out there on eBay!
This is another very, very well made video. I remember my mother in the 1950’s using totally non-electric pure mechanical cameras. I wonder how you develop your negatives. Thanks so much. RS. Canada 🇨🇦
The image quality is impressive! You have a real winner there for sure. Oldest camera I shot with is a Kodak box camera that takes 116 film. Its 100+ years old. Shot some Ilford 3200 in the 120 size and loved it. Spooky old school awesomeness. Thanks for sharing your Rolleiflex in this video!
Would be cool to see a video of you giving it a CLA. Enjoyed this Aly! I’ve always been interested in a TLR. I’ve never shot one. The closest thing is my Mamiya 645 with a WLV but the viewfinders are so expensive. Might get one anyway because it seems like such a neat way to shoot. Especially street.
I had the WLV when I had my 645! It was pretty cool but small. I hope you can try a TLR one day. Especially for street photography. You’re looking down so people don’t know your taking a photo
This was very interesting video. I have older Rolleiflex also. It's Rolleiflex Standard model 622 from 1937. Rough but in working order. I'm thinking if thing with the frame size is due that your camera has converted to use 620 film. Some of Rolleiflex Original cameras were converted to use use both 620 and 120 film. Have you tried if your Rolleiflex accepts 120 film also?
I have tried 120. It doesn’t fit the spool. My camera has been converted from 117 to 620 though, so you could be right. Maybe originally the 117 film was wider. It only gave 6 frames per roll, so that very well could be. Thanks!
Hi Aly, sorry this is off topic but I watched one of your videos where you were looking for the “right” black and white film. But I can’t remember which one you decided on. Was it the Ilford HP5? All your videos are great, I appreciate them.
Hey, yea I was trying to find the right film for my style that I could shoot indoors. So I had to push several different films to find what I liked. I settled on Ilford HP5 400 pushed to 800. It’s what I shoot the most indoors. But when I shoot medium format I actually really loved the results I got with Ilford Delta 3200 shot at 1600. Hope this helps! Thanks for watching.
Great video, love this camera. Have you done the clipping the edge of the film spool with toenail clippers to be able to use 120? I do that with two of my older 620 Kodak cameras, works great, no weird spacing or focus issues from loose film or anything. Stays tight and rolls on through as it should. Then you can use any 120 you want and save money!!! Wahoooo
Greetings from Australia. I have recently uncovered a Rolleiflex Original that my father used before I was born. No 39XXX, in its original leather case. It has the f3.8 shooting lens. Thank you for posting this video, and for the references to resources, which cleared up a number of queries that I had. Could you help me with three queries please? 1. The focussing knob doesn't turn (no film loaded) when I use a small amount of force. Should it rotate freely, or does it lock somehow? 2. Is there a specific order in which the flaps should be closed after using the finder hood e.g holding it as it is used is it left, right, magnifier or right, left ...? 3. There is a mirror in the top cover of the finder hood, which can be folded flat on top of the focus screen after releasing it with a small lever in the left hand edge of the finder hood top. Why is it there and how is this used? Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge and for inspiring me to try shooting some photographs like my father did in the 1950s, and perhaps earlier.
Hi Stephen. Amazing find! I’m not sure why the focus knob wouldn’t be budging. Mine is a little tight. Especially when it’s pulled all the way back to infinity. There is no lock. For the flaps on the viewfinder mine goes the two sides first no specific, then back and front. The mirror on the top flap I actually don’t know why that is there. I did some exploring and I can’t figure it out lol I hope I’ve helped at all.
@@AlysVintageCameraAlley Thanks Aly - much appreciated. These are such beautiful instruments. I hope that I can get a roll through it like you were able to. I’d be happy to retire it then. Best wishes, Stephen.
You’re welcome. I really hope you can too! Especially it being your father’s. That is such a nice bonus to it. Do you have photos he took with the camera?
Great old camera, Aly. Thanks for sharing so much information about its history. And thanks for helping to keep film alive. Wonderful shots as examples.
Thank you!
I really love my much younger Rolleiflex Mx-Evs, and I loved how deep you dug on the history of the company. Learned a lot of new things. I think I will try and date my Rolleiflex now. Thanks for the inspiration.
Thanks so much David. That makes me happy to hear.
Aly, thank you for sharing about your beautiful camera, your experiences and knowledge. So fascinating and I appreciated seeing your images!
Thank you Amanda
Enjoyed the black and white image results you got. Also the info you shared about the history, appreciate your research.
Thanks Joan. I’m glad you liked them.
Love those black and whites. Amazing it still takes such good images. I've got a 3.5 Rolleiflex with a Planar lens and two Rolleicords. Interesting history.
Thank you! I was really pleasantly surprised
That is a great bit of history. The oldest camera that I have is a Kodak Autographic from 1916. I did shoot a roll of film in it using a 116 to 120 adapter. The oldest camera that I regularly shoot with is a Leica iii from 1939.
Wow 1916. That’s really cool
My oldest camera that I've shot with is my father's Argus C3 from about 1948. My most used is a Hasselblad 500C which is from 1967. I have an Exakta Varex VX and a Voightlander Vitessa both from the early 1950"s but they both have issues that make them difficult to use.
I love the C3. Such a cool camera. Thanks for watching!
Stunning results with the colour and that old lens! While I don't have an OG Rolleiflex, I use my Rolleiflex 2.8F often. As for my oldest camera, I have a 1915 Canadian-made Kodak No. 2 Hawk-Eye Model C, which takes 120 film and is made of thick cardboard for the outside body, and super thin plate steel for the interior.
That’s awesome Alex. Especially that it takes 120 film. That’s surprising to me. Was it adapted to take 120 or was 120 available that early? I can’t remember.
@@AlysVintageCameraAlley Takes 120 natively, 120 was created in the early 1900s as an amateur film format.
Nice to see you out and about 😊 Dusting off the shelf queens and seeing what they can do can be very rewarding. I just got back from Tennessee (and bought way too many cameras) and working through a “New to Me” batch of war era folding cameras and lenses. I really should think about getting my blog out of the dirt and dust it off, showing my collection like you have. Currently I’m just posting on IG and Grainy.
Yea definitely give it a go. At the very least it’s a nice record to have for yourself.
I just love 1930s cameras!
If i may a little correction. 35mm film in 1929 was still a novelty in photogrpahy. Commercially only used by Leica at that time but still did not built up steam. That hapened after 1930. Also the 135 format first appeared in 1934 with the first Kodak Retina.
As for the Compur shutters of that era, are easy enough to work on, and built to last forever. Ι worked on probably more than 100 of them. But of course you can not expect to unearth one after 50 or more years and hope to function as they should.
If you are interested you can check about the reassembly of a Compur shutter to my Old Standard Rolleiflex or Welta Weltix video in my channel.
Keep it up!
I will check out the video. Thanks for the info.
Wow, awesome video, awesome camera and awesome photos! I like to think I know a lot about film photography, since I was a hobbyist back in the 1970s and, well, film photography was all we had. But I sure learned a lot from you today. I had no idea that the original Rolleiflex used 620 film instead of 120, and I didn't even known that there had ever been a 117 roll film. I also didn't know that the original Rolleiflex lacked a crank (in later years, the crank was the most obvious difference between a Rolleiflex and a Rolleicord), and I had always thought "Synchro Compur" was some sort of internal branding for Franke & Heidecke, kind of like "Hydra-Matic" is an automatic transmission made for GM cars. Now I find myself wondering what other cameras had Compur shutters. I guess it's never too late to learn something new -- or old, in this case. 🙃
Your mention of the lack of coating on your original Rolleiflex's lenses left me thinking that you might be the first person ever to shoot a roll of color in that particular camera. My few minutes worth of Google research suggests that your camera was built before general purpose color roll film was available. Even if that wasn't the case, your camera was almost certainly built with just b&w film in mind, as color photography wasn't popular among the masses until sometime in the 1960s due to higher cost, lower reliability and shorter print life.
The oldest camera I can remember shooting with were my grandpa's Kodak Holiday Brownie, which could have been made anytime from 1953 to 1962, but was probably bought closer to 1953 as that's when my mom and her sisters were in those childhood years when parents want to take snapshots of them. The first "real" camera I used was my dad's Rolleiflex, which I'm pretty sure was purchased new in 1956. Hopefully one of my brothers still has it.
Fun fact: When I started shopping for my own SLR back in 1979, I really wanted a Rolleiflex SLR, because I had enjoyed Dad's Rolleiflex TLR so much and I knew what a high-quality camera it was. Alas, Rollei only had one line of SLRs available at the time, the Rolleiflex SL35. It was reportedly well-built and took fine photos, but it was heavy and clumsy to use, and expensive to boot. It was also completely devoid of any electronics, which I know many people view (both then and now) as a good thing, but one of the reasons I was buying a new camera at the time was that I wanted some automation to help me get more action shots, so, alas, the Rolleiflex SL35 didn't qualify. I ended up spending about $350 for my Minolta XG-1 outfit, which included the body, normal lens, case, wide neck strap and a bunch of other useful accessories. That same amount would have bought just the Rolleiflex SL35M body (I think that was the least expensive variant at the time) and the f1.4 normal lens I wanted. I guess I could get one now if I really wanted one badly enough -- there seem to be plenty out there on eBay!
Thanks!
I was thinking that too, about the color film. Definitely go pick up that Rollei SLR. It’s never too late.
This is another very, very well made video. I remember my mother in the 1950’s using totally non-electric pure mechanical cameras. I wonder how you develop your negatives.
Thanks so much.
RS. Canada 🇨🇦
Thanks so much!
I develop them myself using a dark Patterson tank and chemicals.
The image quality is impressive! You have a real winner there for sure. Oldest camera I shot with is a Kodak box camera that takes 116 film. Its 100+ years old. Shot some Ilford 3200 in the 120 size and loved it. Spooky old school awesomeness. Thanks for sharing your Rolleiflex in this video!
That sounds great. I love 3200 in 120. Thanks for watching!
Would be cool to see a video of you giving it a CLA. Enjoyed this Aly! I’ve always been interested in a TLR. I’ve never shot one. The closest thing is my Mamiya 645 with a WLV but the viewfinders are so expensive. Might get one anyway because it seems like such a neat way to shoot. Especially street.
I had the WLV when I had my 645! It was pretty cool but small. I hope you can try a TLR one day. Especially for street photography. You’re looking down so people don’t know your taking a photo
@@AlysVintageCameraAlley Yes I’ve never shot like that and always wanted to.
This was very interesting video. I have older Rolleiflex also. It's Rolleiflex Standard model 622 from 1937. Rough but in working order. I'm thinking if thing with the frame size is due that your camera has converted to use 620 film. Some of Rolleiflex Original cameras were converted to use use both 620 and 120 film. Have you tried if your Rolleiflex accepts 120 film also?
I have tried 120. It doesn’t fit the spool. My camera has been converted from 117 to 620 though, so you could be right. Maybe originally the 117 film was wider. It only gave 6 frames per roll, so that very well could be. Thanks!
Great video. I've got a Voightlander Brilliant that is probably from the 30s.
Thanks! Oh nice one
Hi Aly, sorry this is off topic but I watched one of your videos where you were looking for the “right” black and white film. But I can’t remember which one you decided on. Was it the Ilford HP5? All your videos are great, I appreciate them.
Hey, yea I was trying to find the right film for my style that I could shoot indoors. So I had to push several different films to find what I liked. I settled on Ilford HP5 400 pushed to 800. It’s what I shoot the most indoors. But when I shoot medium format I actually really loved the results I got with Ilford Delta 3200 shot at 1600. Hope this helps! Thanks for watching.
Great video, love this camera. Have you done the clipping the edge of the film spool with toenail clippers to be able to use 120? I do that with two of my older 620 Kodak cameras, works great, no weird spacing or focus issues from loose film or anything. Stays tight and rolls on through as it should. Then you can use any 120 you want and save money!!! Wahoooo
I have done that with other cameras but for some reason the width still doesnt fit :/
@@AlysVintageCameraAlley damn....well, worth a shot. Haha
Greetings from Australia. I have recently uncovered a Rolleiflex Original that my father used before I was born. No 39XXX, in its original leather case. It has the f3.8 shooting lens. Thank you for posting this video, and for the references to resources, which cleared up a number of queries that I had. Could you help me with three queries please? 1. The focussing knob doesn't turn (no film loaded) when I use a small amount of force. Should it rotate freely, or does it lock somehow? 2. Is there a specific order in which the flaps should be closed after using the finder hood e.g holding it as it is used is it left, right, magnifier or right, left ...? 3. There is a mirror in the top cover of the finder hood, which can be folded flat on top of the focus screen after releasing it with a small lever in the left hand edge of the finder hood top. Why is it there and how is this used? Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge and for inspiring me to try shooting some photographs like my father did in the 1950s, and perhaps earlier.
Hi Stephen. Amazing find!
I’m not sure why the focus knob wouldn’t be budging. Mine is a little tight. Especially when it’s pulled all the way back to infinity. There is no lock.
For the flaps on the viewfinder mine goes the two sides first no specific, then back and front. The mirror on the top flap I actually don’t know why that is there. I did some exploring and I can’t figure it out lol
I hope I’ve helped at all.
@@AlysVintageCameraAlley Thanks Aly - much appreciated. These are such beautiful instruments. I hope that I can get a roll through it like you were able to. I’d be happy to retire it then. Best wishes, Stephen.
You’re welcome. I really hope you can too! Especially it being your father’s. That is such a nice bonus to it. Do you have photos he took with the camera?
Love your content.. background music is to loud ! It distracts me from trying to listen to your Voice ❤
Thanks for the feedback