About a month ago, I picked up a 3.5F for my travels. I wanted a med format camera to take with me to Asia. Long story short, and I totally didn't expect this, but I have absolutely fallen in love with it. I've shot about 20 rolls so far and I could honestly say it's the most motivating and inspirational camera I've ever used in my photographic career.
I have several Rolleiflex ‘s and Rolleicords and use them on a daily base. One day after some work with Helmut Newton (and his Rolleiflex) I stopped over in Paris to say hello to my friend/colleague Bernard Matussièrre. He had his home and studio in a house at Montparnasse, Paris which he inherited from photographer Emile Muller, who bought the house from Robert Capa (Magnum). And here the strange story starts. Bernard found an old safe in his cellar, which he wanted to show to me. He had opened t before and inside of it were all the Rolleiflex cameras of Robert Capa (Endre Friedmann) and a suitcase fully packed with negatives and a suitcase with clothes. It was left behind by Capa just before he stepped on a landmine, which killed him. Bernard contacted Robert’s brother Cornell, who came over, took the suitcase with his brother’s clothes and left, leaving the cameras and negatives behind. The film material went to Magnum and Bernard nurtured the cameras. I’ve never seen a larger collection of Rolleiflex’s, that made so many famous images, anymore.
People do not walk away , and they love the Art Deco design , and the Twin Lens is so attractive , you can get images with a ROLLEI you will never get on a DSLR or SLR camera. People love the Rollei !! ♥
I inherited my grandfather’s Wide Rolleiflex 4/55 - Model K7W when my mom passed away earlier this year. She never used it and it just sat on a shelf. I took it to a professional camera shop and had it restored and serviced and while I’ve always loved photography, I’ve never really taken photos with much else than either a cheap 35mm as a kid or my iPhone. Everyone at the camera shops drools when I pull the Rolleiflex out so I feel that I owe this camera the service of putting it to use and learning to use it properly. Now that it’s been serviced and restored I bought 5 rolls of B&W film and I’m going to start taking photos.
I owned the 3.5 F model with a built-in light metre and just sold it last year. It had a brighter and nicer focussing screen than earlier models. I enjoyed shooting with it for over 30 years and I appreciated It’s wider field of view than the 80 mm lens. The light meter really helped too and when I was doing my own developing, I used to use the zone system with a spot meter and whenever I did, I found my meter gave me the same reading as using a spot metre so I left the spot metre at home. Because of it’s wider field of view, it’s nice for group shots and yet when you get a little closer, it has a little bit more distortion than the 80 mm lens which I find better for portraits. However, it is an awesome camera and it replaced my Rollei SL 66 which I sold years ago and it paid for my wedding. That camera blew Hasselblad out of the water for being so well designed and such a joy to use. Although much heavier than a TLR and much louder with a focal plane shutter it was still my all-time favourite Camera. I liked having the focussing knob on the left which allowed my right hand to be under the camera with my thumb on the shutter release.great review on a Great camera p, thanks for sharing. Regards Gerry 😊
I've used a Rolleiflex for a couple of decades for just about everything. I'd HIGHLY recommend donning a penta prism rather than the waist level finder whenever you're not required to be physically close to the ground. Getting the taking lens closer to one's eye line helps in a variety of ways, and using the prism also reverses the scene back to 'normal.' That said, a quick tip for those of you new to waist level finders: think of moving the lens toward the subject rather than panning like mad to find the subject on the screen. The tactic has the added benefit of keeping you more engaged with the scene and not lost in a delightfully detached ground glass world. Oh, and it's sometimes a good idea to flip the Rolleiflex above your head and focus looking up at the screen. Sort of like a periscope. It makes you look mental, but it also raises your perspective by quite a lot. Just remember that the 'taking' lens is now on top. You can see Fred Astaire (as Richard Avedon) doing the manoeuvre in Funny Face. ✌🏻
I’m part of a Facebook group where people give away their old stuff and someone posted they put out a bunch of junk and some old camera equipment. Imagine my surprise when I pulled out at rollei in mint condition including the case lens cap and more. Can’t wait to use it!
Nice video. I once owned a YashicaMat 124G but sold it a long time ago. I now have 3 Rolleiflex cameras: Automat MX Type A with 75mm Tessar lens, Rolleiflex T with Tessar 55mm f3.5, and the Rolleiflex 3.5F with 75mm Xenotar. The 3.5F is the heaviest of the three, so I'm assuming that it was made stronger or has more internal parts. I love them all. I would love to own a 2.8F Planar, but really, it's not critical for me. If one should happen to fall into my lap, I'll take it! 🙂 And I also have Prisms for both the Rolleiflex (3.5T and 3.5F). So it corrects the backwards viewing. I also own a Mamiya C330S. This camera is a bit larger than the Rolleiflexes and can take interchangeable lenses (true systems camera). Mamiya-Sekor lenses are super sharp and contrasty.
I have a rolleiflex 2.8e tlr camera from 1955 that was my grandfathers and my parents recently passed it down to me im just so excited to take photos with it and pass it down to my future generations!! 😁
Recently acquired a Ricohflex Dia model with an 80mm F3.5 on it! I'm busting at the seams to run a roll thru it lol Excellent video my friend. Much love from Tennessee, USA🙏🏼
Hi! I've two 3.5F and love shooting with them . The Rolleiflex system is amazing and ingenious, the accessories are a lesson in design and use. I also love how compact the system is, specially compared to 35mm systems. The fact that it has a single lens is not a problem for me, I find this limitation forces me to move more to find the right composition, which results in better images. One "accessory" I found a must is the Rollei P11 Universal slide projector, which can be found very cheaply. It projects 35, 4x4 (Baby Rolleiflex) and 6x6 slides. If you never saw a 6x6 slide projected, you never experienced how amazing this can be. In detail, sharpness, I was shocked when I first saw it! Other accessories I find useful are the Rolleinar close-up lenses, the lens hood (a must), and a neck strap - doesn't have to be from Rolleiflex brand, which are thin for long use. Compared to other non-TLR 8x8 systems, the Rolleiflex produces equivalent images on a very small and lighter package. For travel or street there's no comparision. Before shooting with it, get to know the position of the controls and the feeling of each one, specially the shutter speeds "clicks". They act differently on every sample. With time and practice you'll know at what speed you're shooting without even looking. It's much more ergonomic than you'll find at first. But it's a different approach you have learn. After that, you will operate it with your eyes closed, everything is at a finger distance. Great camera, great system, great results!
I’ll comment, if only to echo the many previous comments. I too am obsessed with my Rollei’s. A 2.8D, a Rolleicord Vbii and a 35 SE. All of them in mint condition and recently CLA’d by very competent people. The one common thread with each of these cameras; they all take ridiculously sharp images. Never mind the emotion of using such a beautiful mechanical camera that feels so good in your hands. Great camera equipment does not make great photographers; however, it makes you feel great using the camera. Therefore getting me inspired to get out and shoot. I get similar emotion shooting my Leica’s and Nikon cameras, however, the Rolleiflex is special. If I have one suggestion for those want to enter the TLR/Rollie market….get a good Rolleicord first. They are way less expensive and it still produces beautiful/sharp images. A Vb can be had for about $400USD or $500 for a mint, recently CLA’d copy. The Rolleicord is almost 200 gms lighter and slightly smaller too than the 2.8D
Thank you very much for your fine video about the Rolleiflex. I myself have the Rolleiflex T3 "White Face" with the 75 mm f/3,5 Zeiss Tessar from about 1976. The "T" is a budget Rolleiflex, however, in fact almost as good as the professional one. It is easy to change the screen and I bought a new one from Oleson which is much brighter than the original. I am very pleased with my Rolleiflex and it is fun to use it. Kind regards from Sweden!
The camera store I worked in sold both Rolei and Yashica. Both are very fine cameras. You should have tried them when they were brand new, such smooth operation. Anyway, the killer on both was the price of additional lenses. Because each lens is two lenses (the primary and the focusing lens are one piece), they were literally double the cost of a 36 mm SLR lens of comparable type. They were often clunkier than an SLR to shoot, but they did have some benefits other than the huge negative size, like shooting (a parade) from behind a crowd; you could use it like a periscope. Also keeping the strap taught while shooting made it a bit more stable.
have the rolleiflex 3.5e and i love 6x6 format, just feel diffrent than what i used to, its feel more liberate no boundries when take the photo, and i think its a perfect camera for street photography, people doesn't feel offended or get intimidated when we take a picture of them on the street
I own the Rolleiflex 2.8D and the later Automat 3.5 model. Both are great cameras and have been serviced. These camera’s are my go to when I want to travel and pack light to photograph.
Own this exact same model. Sadly, I will probably never use it again. Had the screen upgraded and CLA'd years ago. Still seems really accurate by shutter speed sound. It's so expensive for each click of the shutter! The few times I've taken it out in public this camera is a magnet. People want to ask you about it. Despite that it's surprisingly non threatening to people. You have a great eye!
Loved it!! Each photograph is print-worthy in my opinion. There is something about the square format that I like the most. I have recently bought a Bronica SQ-A and trying to wrap my head around film photography. Your video helped a lot. Subscribed right away!! :)
I have a Rolleiflex 2.8C; late 50s. I got it when the opportunity presented itself a couple years ago; it had just been rebuilt. It has a ‘look’ that’s for sure; quite different from my other medium format cameras. I just had a cast removed from my right arm (broken wrist). I’ve only started using 35mm cameras again but this video is inspiring me to take the Rolleiflex out. Maybe after another week of OT I’ll be ready! Thanks for this.
My friend from Adelaide owned and used a Rolleflex when they were new back in the day. He loved using that camera for fashion shoots. Thanks for doing this awesome review Hashem! 😎✌️
As a proud owner of a 2.8f you hit the nail on the head. Shooting with the Rollei is a special occasion on many levels. The Rollinar's, Mutar extension lenses and viewfinder prism come highly recommended if you want to expand on this great system.
I have looked at the Mutar , and do find having one appealing , I have a set of Japanese extension lenses , that went to Vietnam with me , the Rollei D 75mm is an amazing Street and Travel camera.
Had a Rolleiflex decades ago for a short time and sold it to fund a Hasselblad. 6 years ago I got a 3.5 Automat. Great camera. It’s pretty special using a TLR. Just got a Rolleicord Art Deco and that’s a horse I have to break. Or maybe it needs to break me. Either way, stunning camera.
The Rolleflex camera is like the Ducati motorcycle. Both have tons of style and function. They may cost a tad more, but are well worth it. The ergonomics just make the photo experience just that little bit more rewarding. When the payment comes thru for that kidney I sold I'll get a Rollei!!!!
I own two Rollieflex cameras and enjoy them both. It takes time and patience to learn and use them but the results are amazing and rewarding. I don’t think there is any other camera that can replace my Rollieflex. Thank you for your wonderful and informative review.
Both the 2.8 and 3.5 are great. I have one of each, and previously had a couple 124s. I love all TLRs but they will be expensive when they need service. Worth it IMO.
Love my Rolleiflex! Have the T version with the tessar lens and can I say this lens is just super sharp! Used to have the 2.8F and sold it due to the heftier weight and size, luckily I made a significant profit due to the prices and mine was in mint condition. The T has an interesting way of coupled f and shutter which you can quickly pull on the tab and change individually if you want. The build is just as good as the 2.8F and without the price tag! Anyone looking at Rolleiflex should look at this model! Thanks for the video!
I own 3 TLR. A French Semflex which is quite basic but give interesting output. It is a bare minimum camera which use red windows for film advance. A Yashica 635 which is basically the same as your with 135 film capability which is a nice addition when you want to have a longer lens (80mm on 135 is quite nice) And a Rolleiflex T which is quite cheaper than the 3,5 or the 2,8 but give pretty good result. The controls are just a little bit more complicated to use. I had some bad experience in general with the Yashica MAT 124G which has known reliability issue on the advance lever. Mine was able to advance, but the shutter was never cocked. I did get it fixed two times with two different shop before giving up and buying a Rolleiflex T which feel more solid.
Thirty five years ago I owned and used a Rolleiflex 3.5F with Planar objective and light meter. I was fun to use and made great pictures. Sadly I sold it. Recently I bought a Rolleiflex Automat type II from 1938 with uncoated 3.5 Tessar objective. The glare of the lens makes beautiful pictures. It is harder to focus than with the 3.5F but is still fun to use. In this camera I use 200 ASA black and white film, which is scanned to high resolution digital images.
I am thinking of buying a Rollie I did not realise there are a different models out there, these cameras have always integrated me. Thanks for you cool video
I have the Rolleiflex 2.8C, I swore I wouldn't get into medium format but a mate needed money and he was slimming down his collection so I "helped" him out. I love the camera but don't shoot with it enough so focusing is difficult but I hope to keep it forever.
Hi Kribomon ! Glad you got a Rollei, now here is my tip to easier focusing….Open your hood and learn to use the focusing lens right under the sport finder rear opening….The image is reverse…yes but by the next day you won’t even notice it ! Also the screen is protected from the sun ! great !! I have used that system so many times especially as I was using the sportsfinder a lot when shooting weddings. My Rollei is a ‘55 and is still 95% like new !! got myself a brand new crank some 10 years ago. I baby it but use it just the same ! Enjoy it ! Bought mine brand new, never use the case, it slows you down.
I also own a 2.8c, hands on the best camera I’ve ever used. Now servicing by the best rolleiflex tech in Taiwan, can’t wait to have it back. At the mean time, I’m using a Minolta autocord. The autocord is noticeably better than all other TLRs I tried other than rolleiflex, even better than the rolleicord. The sharpness and contrast is great, built quality is awesome and have the hefty weight just like the rolleiflex. Highly recommended if anyone want to shoot TLRs without breaking the bank but I believe every TLR shooters will eventually ended up with a rolleiflex
Rolleiflexes are my favorite cameras. Years ago I got a 2.8E relatively cheap because of small scratches in the lens. Much to my surprise the lens was not only still good, it is remarkably sharp. I also got a Rolleiflex Automat with Tessar lens that I also like. My favorite photo setup to take out is relatively compact bag which is just big enough for one Rollei, a Weston battery-less light meter, and a few film rolls.
I've used various Rollei TLRs (both 'Cord and 'Flex). Yes they are certainly very capable cameras and a nice conversation starter. Doesn't give intimidating look when being carried around. For me, TLRs are about simplicity (ignore the Mamiya C system). Cannot change lens, so you have to work within the limitation. If you want a more versatile system, consider the SL66 as a complement. There you go: the Rollei combo.
I own two, 2.8C and a 3.5F both with Xenotar lenses and i both sent them out for a CLA. The 2.8C has nicer bokeh due to the 10 bladed aperture. But the 3.5F is more user-friendly: 1/500 can be selected when the shutter is cocked and the viewfinder is nicer and it's brighter too.
I have the 2.8F and 3.5F and a serious advantage is the brightness of the screen. The 2.8 viewfinder is much brighter than the 3.5 one. The primary difference between the Yashica and the Rolleiflex is the build quality. Rolleiflex is built to a much higher standard and will therefore cost less over time than fixing up a Yashica, presuming you can even find someone to service the Yashica.
We have a great photo collection at our MOMA museum here in San Francisco, including many images by Rollei. The combo of waist level shooting and those beautiful silver loaded papers from the 1940's and 50's is something to behold along with the great eye of the photographers. I used my father's Rollei as a table prop in my short film noir, Bum Rap Andre Hunt
Thanks for this. I think I need to get out and use mine. I was given an almost mint F4 Wide version plus lots of accessories.I have put only one film through it and have not got to a lab with it yet.Good samples and comparison. This will be a new years resolution for me. cheers Geoff
Loved the vid! I recently picked up my first TLR, the Airesflex Model U. The Rolleiflex is just too expensive for my budget right now. I definitely wanna try one now though.
thank you for the nice video.....I just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5/75 in mint condition and I am about to use it for the first time....I will send the camera for a complete LCA soon just to make sure all is ok..The only thing not working is the light meter but I have been told that it is normal for a camera this old ......but its ok since I use an external SEKONIC light meter. Also its very hard for me to find a neck strap..but I am looking around. By the way I live in south italy....The camera has been used very little by the previous owner....and for 200 euros I could not pass it...!!!
I have a Yashica B. I love it and like the leaver to cock the clutter as it prevents me from accidentally taking a photo. I’ve worked out a system of winding the film forward after taking the shot. Then as I’m about to take the next shot I cock the shutter.
I have a 2.8c & 2.8d Both Xenotar lens. Although the 2.8c has 10 blade aperture, I vastly prefer the 2.8d due to the upgrades like EV lock, & unrestricted 1/500 versus the 2.8c. I’ve traveled all over the world with my 2.8d. It’s my lifetime camera now
No way hahah, i litterly just finished scanning my first roll of 6x6 from my uncle's TLR just to see hashem post a new banger about rollei :) Going to make some popcorn for this one! merry xmas Hashem
Great vid Hashem! Been looking forward to this one. I have a 3.5F, and between the paralax compensating finder mask, functional lightmeter, and character, it's quickly gone to the top of my favourite cameras to use.
Great video Hashem. Those Rollei's are just so nice to use. I shoot a baby grey 127 Rollei and absolutely love it even though it means hand cutting film, it gets used more than my other TLR being a Mamiya C220 which is also a great camera but doesn't have that Rollei 'feel' when using it.
Something about the Rolleiflex - people love it and often comment to me while I'm out shooting with it. The periscope design gives interest to pictures by having that low perspective, but can also be used upside down up high for a downward view (you must try if you haven't!!).
Nice video about a very special camera. The Rolleiflex is very special to me. One of my favorite cameras and also Mediumformat camera i own. Its SO fun to use and it was one of the first cameras i wanted to get hold of once i returned to analog photography. The one i settled on was the Rolleiflex 75T, i liked the slightly wider lens and also the price was decent considering it was a newly serviced camera and a great range of accessories being a Bay 1 mount lens. I have used mine a lot, and since i got it have several cool accessories for it i frequently use. Like the Rolinar 1 and 2, some filters and also looking to get a softfilter for it as well ( Rolleisoft) . Funnily enough just a few days ago i was looking into getting another one, maybe this time an F model or a more expensive f2,8 E or C model. I heard the Xenotar lens is slightly more sharp and has even better character. But thus far i LOVE the images i get from my Tessar lens o nthe T. I have no lightmeter on mine but its fast to use and always give great exposures using the sunny 16 or a external light meter. No issues whatsoever. The F2,8 also have a 80 mm lens, so that could be a great addition for even better portraits was my reasoning . So yeh, i love the Rolleiflex and think i will always have one or two in my kit, its great for street, for landscape, for portraits, you name it. On the streets its like you say in the video an amazing conversation starter, and i never got any bad reactions thus far when i used it. Nice 1 Hash :) /regards Martin.
Going to take some photos at a play My daughter is in it and hope to get some fine images at their rehearsal. then the performance as the lights of the stage should be able to shot at a higher aputure and speed thanks for your reveiw
I inherited one from my dad. He bought it around 1955 while he was stationed in Germany during the US -Korean War. Haven't yet tried it. What is a good source for 120 film these days? And processing?
I have never owned one but have shot with the 55mm and the 80 2.8.. Personally i think the ergonomics is terrible and although i like how lightweight it is and how quiet the leaf shutter is ,i just hate the double handling ....focus left side , change hands to shoot and wind on before changing back again to focus. Works fine on a tripod but terrible in the hand. I did love the Mamiya C330 though but its much bigger. I tend to think many are wearing rose tinted glasses when using some cameras.
I do have a Rolleiflex with the 3.5/75 Xenar lens (a 4 elements in 3 groups lens design), and it performs quite similarly to my Yashica Mat-124 G. The Schneider Xenotar design has 5 elements (similar to Zeiss Biometar), so it is different to the cheaper 3.5 lenses (including the Xenar). The 3.5 Planar might be different, but maybe also 5 elements, while the 2.8 Planar should be 6 elements and differ in rendering. I found the 3.5 Xenar to be already a nice lens, even though not "perfect" at 3.5. TLRs have their strengths (a rather robust construction), but I'm a bit undecided if I prefer folding cameras (my Agfa Super Isolette is much more compact, but framing is better with a TLR, while a 6x9 folding camera is something completely different).
One thing not mentioned about Rolleis and TLRS in general. When you press the shutter you take the picture right , away. When I use an SLR many times the picture comes out with the persons eyes closed.
cheers for the cool video. Very good amd i totally agree with all you said. can you tell me where to get the focus screens. The old one on my rolleiflex c is so dark so after 70 years an upgrade might be nice.
Another 6x6 TLR that's worth looking into is the Minolta Autocord. Better lens than the Yashica, easier loading than the Rolleiflex. But slightly harder to find.
Ikoflex serie from Carl Zeiss is better choice if you still want the German lens quality and slightly expensive than minolta but not like Rolleiflex/Rolleicord or Yashica
No one commenting on that perfectly kept Agfa Optima? Sometimes I wish I could have gotten to try Agfa Color film but it's about a lost cause nowadays. Also absolutely beautiful shots. I particularly like those of your partner/wife, and a lot of the Medium format look with smoother tonality and DoF I delved into TLRs with a Rolleicord, which might be a better comparison to the Rolleiflex as it's their own "Amateur" model. Actually quite interesting shootout with the Yashica, as I haven't had (to my eyes) that good luck with older 6x6 cameras with Tessar Types. WLF is nice, but my style of shooting is easier with a RF VF.
If still want some German lens on TLR, I will try Ikoflex I/II/III for alternative cheaper than Rolleiflex/Rolleicord. For sure the price pay for quality from Rollei but not for me
Hashem ; : I have a Rollei Distgon 55mm F4 Wide , and the 75mm F3.5 . My 55mm W is new to me , and I am still learning its strengths and being a bit wider than the 75mm you can do amazing images. I like the E Model with light meter , though the dual range Light Meter is a new thing to me. The 55mm is superbly magical being solid , well built and a joy in the hands as well as pure design art. The 75mm 3.5 D has no light meter , so I use the phone metering , and I have taken many inspiring and amazing images with my D Model. I have all 3 Rollenair close focus lenses , the #2 is mounted on the strap in the case , using the close focus lenses you can leap into another realm and expand the usefulness and it is sheer delight .... when your imaging with a 75mm Tessar lens. These are amazing cameras and are a joy to use compose with and just feel so good in hand. Nothing compares , even my M Leica's cannot compare to the 55mm F4 Distagon in terms of the feel of use. I love my Leica's and they are film , but for sheer delight and immersion in your Art ... it is ROLLEI all the way.
The ONLY difference between a Rolleiflex 3.5 and 2.8 is the max aperture and thus the size of the taking lens. Obviously, for many that is worth the price difference. Yashicas are great. For me, a Rolleiflex is just mechanically more refined, especially with fast winding, etc. Feels durable and solid. I often use the wide angle lens adapter, giving me the equivalent of 35mm in ¨standard¨ film. I don't think this exists for Yashica. If the above is not important, buy a Yashica and spend the money you saved on film and coffee when you go out shooting.
The max aperture size doesn't tell the whole story. The 2.8 viewfinder is much much brighter than the 3.5. The 3.5 is almost a struggle to use in the corners.
The only difference between the Rolleiflex 2,8 and 3,5. is the lens. I have never understood why especially in the USA, people are willing to pay so much more for the 2,8, less than one stop faster. Is it that the taking lens is larger, making the camera look better? The 2,8 is also heavier, because of the bigger lens.
Only one stop? Only the lens?? In the 1920s rollfilm was at ISO 20! Some even 10. By the end of the war at 64 and only by early 50ies Kodak went to 100/160 ISO. 400 ISO only came in 1967. That's why Weegee needed huge flash lights firing one bulb a photo (30ies & 40ies). So, one stop is huge, mate. Still today. Are you aware of both price and optical differences between f2.0/1.8/1.4/1.2 or noct even? The Rolleiflex 2.8 was only for the US market (1949) while Europe got the 3.5. I assume that was because the US was ahead with press photography and thus could afford the more expensive cameras. Again WEEGEE. Look him up. One more: Hollywood needed HUGE lights until the 60ies for that ISO issue, that's why the moved to Southern Cali in the first place, for sun. Studios then even had open roofs for sun.
Only one stop? Only the lens?? In the 1920s rollfilm was at ISO 20! Some even 10. By the end of the war at 64 and only by early 50ies Kodak went to 100/160 ISO. 400 ISO only came in 1967. That's why Weegee needed huge flash lights firing one bulb a photo (30ies & 40ies). So, one stop is huge, mate. Still today. Are you aware of both price and optical differences between f2.0/1.8/1.4/1.2 or noct even? The Rolleiflex 2.8 was only for the US market (1949) while Europe got the 3.5. I assume that was because the US was ahead with press photography and thus could afford the more expensive cameras. Again WEEGEE. Look him up. Fast lenses are made for low light, not for the aesthetics of blurry backgrounds, its just a side effe really. And as long as people shoot at daylight, and claim there is no difference, or only refer to depth of field as comparison, it is not the full story. Misleading in fact.
About a month ago, I picked up a 3.5F for my travels. I wanted a med format camera to take with me to Asia. Long story short, and I totally didn't expect this, but I have absolutely fallen in love with it. I've shot about 20 rolls so far and I could honestly say it's the most motivating and inspirational camera I've ever used in my photographic career.
Nice! It would be a great medium format option for travel 😁
Gostaria muito de ter uma máquina dessa
I have several Rolleiflex ‘s and Rolleicords and use them on a daily base.
One day after some work with Helmut Newton (and his Rolleiflex) I stopped over in Paris to say hello to my friend/colleague Bernard Matussièrre. He had his home and studio in a house at Montparnasse, Paris which he inherited from photographer Emile Muller, who bought the house from Robert Capa (Magnum). And here the strange story starts.
Bernard found an old safe in his cellar, which he wanted to show to me. He had opened t before and inside of it were all the Rolleiflex cameras of Robert Capa (Endre Friedmann) and a suitcase fully packed with negatives and a suitcase with clothes. It was left behind by Capa just before he stepped on a landmine, which killed him.
Bernard contacted Robert’s brother Cornell, who came over, took the suitcase with his brother’s clothes and left, leaving the cameras and negatives behind.
The film material went to Magnum and Bernard nurtured the cameras.
I’ve never seen a larger collection of Rolleiflex’s, that made so many famous images, anymore.
I love my Rolleiflex! It hasn't let me down in 43 years. A true pleasure to shoot and own.
My Rolleiflex 2.8f is by far my favourite camera to shoot with. Especially for street portraits. It’s such a conversation starter!
People do not walk away , and they love the Art Deco design , and the Twin Lens is so attractive , you can get images with a ROLLEI you will never get on a DSLR or SLR camera. People love the Rollei !! ♥
It's true. I've never had anyone turn down a portrait with the Rolleiflex. It just seems intriguing and non-confrontational.
I inherited my grandfather’s Wide Rolleiflex 4/55 - Model K7W when my mom passed away earlier this year. She never used it and it just sat on a shelf. I took it to a professional camera shop and had it restored and serviced and while I’ve always loved photography, I’ve never really taken photos with much else than either a cheap 35mm as a kid or my iPhone.
Everyone at the camera shops drools when I pull the Rolleiflex out so I feel that I owe this camera the service of putting it to use and learning to use it properly. Now that it’s been serviced and restored I bought 5 rolls of B&W film and I’m going to start taking photos.
I owned the 3.5 F model with a built-in light metre and just sold it last year. It had a brighter and nicer focussing screen than earlier models. I enjoyed shooting with it for over 30 years and I appreciated It’s wider field of view than the 80 mm lens. The light meter really helped too and when I was doing my own developing, I used to use the zone system with a spot meter and whenever I did, I found my meter gave me the same reading as using a spot metre so I left the spot metre at home. Because of it’s wider field of view, it’s nice for group shots and yet when you get a little closer, it has a little bit more distortion than the 80 mm lens which I find better for portraits. However, it is an awesome camera and it replaced my Rollei SL 66 which I sold years ago and it paid for my wedding. That camera blew Hasselblad out of the water for being so well designed and such a joy to use. Although much heavier than a TLR and much louder with a focal plane shutter it was still my all-time favourite Camera. I liked having the focussing knob on the left which allowed my right hand to be under the camera with my thumb on the shutter release.great review on a Great camera p, thanks for sharing. Regards Gerry 😊
I've used a Rolleiflex for a couple of decades for just about everything. I'd HIGHLY recommend donning a penta prism rather than the waist level finder whenever you're not required to be physically close to the ground. Getting the taking lens closer to one's eye line helps in a variety of ways, and using the prism also reverses the scene back to 'normal.'
That said, a quick tip for those of you new to waist level finders: think of moving the lens toward the subject rather than panning like mad to find the subject on the screen. The tactic has the added benefit of keeping you more engaged with the scene and not lost in a delightfully detached ground glass world.
Oh, and it's sometimes a good idea to flip the Rolleiflex above your head and focus looking up at the screen. Sort of like a periscope. It makes you look mental, but it also raises your perspective by quite a lot. Just remember that the 'taking' lens is now on top. You can see Fred Astaire (as Richard Avedon) doing the manoeuvre in Funny Face. ✌🏻
I’m part of a Facebook group where people give away their old stuff and someone posted they put out a bunch of junk and some old camera equipment. Imagine my surprise when I pulled out at rollei in mint condition including the case lens cap and more. Can’t wait to use it!
Nice video. I once owned a YashicaMat 124G but sold it a long time ago. I now have 3 Rolleiflex cameras: Automat MX Type A with 75mm Tessar lens, Rolleiflex T with Tessar 55mm f3.5, and the Rolleiflex 3.5F with 75mm Xenotar. The 3.5F is the heaviest of the three, so I'm assuming that it was made stronger or has more internal parts. I love them all. I would love to own a 2.8F Planar, but really, it's not critical for me. If one should happen to fall into my lap, I'll take it! 🙂 And I also have Prisms for both the Rolleiflex (3.5T and 3.5F). So it corrects the backwards viewing. I also own a Mamiya C330S. This camera is a bit larger than the Rolleiflexes and can take interchangeable lenses (true systems camera). Mamiya-Sekor lenses are super sharp and contrasty.
I have a rolleiflex 2.8e tlr camera from 1955 that was my grandfathers and my parents recently passed it down to me im just so excited to take photos with it and pass it down to my future generations!! 😁
Recently acquired a Ricohflex Dia model with an 80mm F3.5 on it! I'm busting at the seams to run a roll thru it lol
Excellent video my friend. Much love from Tennessee, USA🙏🏼
Hi! I've two 3.5F and love shooting with them . The Rolleiflex system is amazing and ingenious, the accessories are a lesson in design and use. I also love how compact the system is, specially compared to 35mm systems. The fact that it has a single lens is not a problem for me, I find this limitation forces me to move more to find the right composition, which results in better images.
One "accessory" I found a must is the Rollei P11 Universal slide projector, which can be found very cheaply. It projects 35, 4x4 (Baby Rolleiflex) and 6x6 slides. If you never saw a 6x6 slide projected, you never experienced how amazing this can be. In detail, sharpness, I was shocked when I first saw it!
Other accessories I find useful are the Rolleinar close-up lenses, the lens hood (a must), and a neck strap - doesn't have to be from Rolleiflex brand, which are thin for long use.
Compared to other non-TLR 8x8 systems, the Rolleiflex produces equivalent images on a very small and lighter package. For travel or street there's no comparision.
Before shooting with it, get to know the position of the controls and the feeling of each one, specially the shutter speeds "clicks". They act differently on every sample. With time and practice you'll know at what speed you're shooting without even looking. It's much more ergonomic than you'll find at first. But it's a different approach you have learn. After that, you will operate it with your eyes closed, everything is at a finger distance.
Great camera, great system, great results!
I’ll comment, if only to echo the many previous comments.
I too am obsessed with my Rollei’s. A 2.8D, a Rolleicord Vbii and a 35 SE. All of them in mint condition and recently CLA’d by very competent people.
The one common thread with each of these cameras; they all take ridiculously sharp images. Never mind the emotion of using such a beautiful mechanical camera that feels so good in your hands.
Great camera equipment does not make great photographers; however, it makes you feel great using the camera. Therefore getting me inspired to get out and shoot. I get similar emotion shooting my Leica’s and Nikon cameras, however, the Rolleiflex is special.
If I have one suggestion for those want to enter the TLR/Rollie market….get a good Rolleicord first. They are way less expensive and it still produces beautiful/sharp images. A Vb can be had for about $400USD or $500 for a mint, recently CLA’d copy. The Rolleicord is almost 200 gms lighter and slightly smaller too than the 2.8D
Thank you very much for your fine video about the Rolleiflex. I myself have the Rolleiflex T3 "White Face" with the 75 mm f/3,5 Zeiss Tessar from about 1976. The "T" is a budget Rolleiflex, however, in fact almost as good as the professional one. It is easy to change the screen and I bought a new one from Oleson which is much brighter than the original. I am very pleased with my Rolleiflex and it is fun to use it. Kind regards from Sweden!
The camera store I worked in sold both Rolei and Yashica. Both are very fine cameras. You should have tried them when they were brand new, such smooth operation. Anyway, the killer on both was the price of additional lenses. Because each lens is two lenses (the primary and the focusing lens are one piece), they were literally double the cost of a 36 mm SLR lens of comparable type. They were often clunkier than an SLR to shoot, but they did have some benefits other than the huge negative size, like shooting (a parade) from behind a crowd; you could use it like a periscope. Also keeping the strap taught while shooting made it a bit more stable.
have the rolleiflex 3.5e and i love 6x6 format, just feel diffrent than what i used to, its feel more liberate no boundries when take the photo, and i think its a perfect camera for street photography, people doesn't feel offended or get intimidated when we take a picture of them on the street
I own the Rolleiflex 2.8D and the later Automat 3.5 model. Both are great cameras and have been serviced. These camera’s are my go to when I want to travel and pack light to photograph.
Own this exact same model. Sadly, I will probably never use it again. Had the screen upgraded and CLA'd years ago. Still seems really accurate by shutter speed sound. It's so expensive for each click of the shutter! The few times I've taken it out in public this camera is a magnet. People want to ask you about it. Despite that it's surprisingly non threatening to people. You have a great eye!
Loved it!! Each photograph is print-worthy in my opinion. There is something about the square format that I like the most. I have recently bought a Bronica SQ-A and trying to wrap my head around film photography. Your video helped a lot. Subscribed right away!! :)
Hey, thanks so much! Nice choice with the Bronica, they offer great value and performance... enjoy!
I have a Rolleiflex 2.8C; late 50s. I got it when the opportunity presented itself a couple years ago; it had just been rebuilt. It has a ‘look’ that’s for sure; quite different from my other medium format cameras. I just had a cast removed from my right arm (broken wrist). I’ve only started using 35mm cameras again but this video is inspiring me to take the Rolleiflex out. Maybe after another week of OT I’ll be ready! Thanks for this.
Hope you have a smooth recovery and enjoy using the camera again!
My friend from Adelaide owned and used a Rolleflex when they were new back in the day. He loved using that camera for fashion shoots.
Thanks for doing this awesome review Hashem! 😎✌️
As a proud owner of a 2.8f you hit the nail on the head. Shooting with the Rollei is a special occasion on many levels. The Rollinar's, Mutar extension lenses and viewfinder prism come highly recommended if you want to expand on this great system.
I have looked at the Mutar , and do find having one appealing , I have a set of Japanese extension lenses , that went to Vietnam with me , the Rollei D 75mm is an amazing Street and Travel camera.
Had a Rolleiflex decades ago for a short time and sold it to fund a Hasselblad. 6 years ago I got a 3.5 Automat. Great camera. It’s pretty special using a TLR. Just got a Rolleicord Art Deco and that’s a horse I have to break. Or maybe it needs to break me. Either way, stunning camera.
The Rolleflex camera is like the Ducati motorcycle. Both have tons of style and function. They may cost a tad more, but are well worth it. The ergonomics just make the photo experience just that little bit more rewarding. When the payment comes thru for that kidney I sold I'll get a Rollei!!!!
When I heard Agfa Optima 100... such a great film!
i have the old standard 622 (tessar 3.5) and it's my go to camera with all the flaws
Got my first Rolleiflex in 2019 for the same reason, Vivian's work. Agreed with you on the points in this video. Great little camera.
I own two Rollieflex cameras and enjoy them both.
It takes time and patience to learn and use them but the results are amazing and rewarding. I don’t think there is any other camera that can replace my Rollieflex.
Thank you for your wonderful and informative review.
There is nothing , like a serviced and looked after ROLLEI for the joy of the moment , the immersion and delight. You get grand images too.
Thanks for watching!
Both the 2.8 and 3.5 are great. I have one of each, and previously had a couple 124s. I love all TLRs but they will be expensive when they need service. Worth it IMO.
Inspiring video! I have a Rolleicord V and the results that a get are always amazing
Love my Rolleiflex! Have the T version with the tessar lens and can I say this lens is just super sharp! Used to have the 2.8F and sold it due to the heftier weight and size, luckily I made a significant profit due to the prices and mine was in mint condition. The T has an interesting way of coupled f and shutter which you can quickly pull on the tab and change individually if you want. The build is just as good as the 2.8F and without the price tag! Anyone looking at Rolleiflex should look at this model! Thanks for the video!
Nice! Thanks for watching :-)
I own 3 TLR.
A French Semflex which is quite basic but give interesting output. It is a bare minimum camera which use red windows for film advance.
A Yashica 635 which is basically the same as your with 135 film capability which is a nice addition when you want to have a longer lens (80mm on 135 is quite nice)
And a Rolleiflex T which is quite cheaper than the 3,5 or the 2,8 but give pretty good result. The controls are just a little bit more complicated to use.
I had some bad experience in general with the Yashica MAT 124G which has known reliability issue on the advance lever. Mine was able to advance, but the shutter was never cocked. I did get it fixed two times with two different shop before giving up and buying a Rolleiflex T which feel more solid.
Thirty five years ago I owned and used a Rolleiflex 3.5F with Planar objective and light meter. I was fun to use and made great pictures. Sadly I sold it. Recently I bought a Rolleiflex Automat type II from 1938 with uncoated 3.5 Tessar objective. The glare of the lens makes beautiful pictures. It is harder to focus than with the 3.5F but is still fun to use. In this camera I use 200 ASA black and white film, which is scanned to high resolution digital images.
I am thinking of buying a Rollie I did not realise there are a different models out there, these cameras have always integrated me.
Thanks for you cool video
Glad you liked it! Yeah there's so much variation
fun video, i my self own a yaschica 635 and never saw the need to pay way more for a collectors item, also glad you brought up vivian in your video!
Just bought one :) Last used one in 1964. This is a dream come true.
Nice!
I just got my hands on a 2.8e that was originally sold by A. Leistenschneider in Dusseldorf. Can't wait to develop my first roll!
I have the Rolleiflex 2.8C, I swore I wouldn't get into medium format but a mate needed money and he was slimming down his collection so I "helped" him out. I love the camera but don't shoot with it enough so focusing is difficult but I hope to keep it forever.
Hi Kribomon ! Glad you got a Rollei, now here is my tip to easier focusing….Open your hood and learn to use the focusing lens right under the sport finder rear opening….The image is reverse…yes but by the next day you won’t even notice it ! Also the screen is protected from the sun ! great !! I have used that system so many times especially as I was using the sportsfinder a lot when shooting weddings. My Rollei is a ‘55 and is still 95% like new !! got myself a brand new crank some 10 years ago. I baby it but use it just the same ! Enjoy it !
Bought mine brand new, never use the case, it slows you down.
I also own a 2.8c, hands on the best camera I’ve ever used. Now servicing by the best rolleiflex tech in Taiwan, can’t wait to have it back.
At the mean time, I’m using a Minolta autocord. The autocord is noticeably better than all other TLRs I tried other than rolleiflex, even better than the rolleicord. The sharpness and contrast is great, built quality is awesome and have the hefty weight just like the rolleiflex. Highly recommended if anyone want to shoot TLRs without breaking the bank but I believe every TLR shooters will eventually ended up with a rolleiflex
Mate, watching this makes me want to pick one up. 🙌 Great review!
Thanks man!
Rolleiflexes are my favorite cameras. Years ago I got a 2.8E relatively cheap because of small scratches in the lens. Much to my surprise the lens was not only still good, it is remarkably sharp. I also got a Rolleiflex Automat with Tessar lens that I also like. My favorite photo setup to take out is relatively compact bag which is just big enough for one Rollei, a Weston battery-less light meter, and a few film rolls.
I've used various Rollei TLRs (both 'Cord and 'Flex). Yes they are certainly very capable cameras and a nice conversation starter. Doesn't give intimidating look when being carried around. For me, TLRs are about simplicity (ignore the Mamiya C system). Cannot change lens, so you have to work within the limitation. If you want a more versatile system, consider the SL66 as a complement. There you go: the Rollei combo.
I have an 3.5E Planar and still love it. It's one of the cameras I will never sell in my life... It can also do great macros using the Rolleinar-Kit.
For sure! It's great that they can still be serviced
I own two, 2.8C and a 3.5F both with Xenotar lenses and i both sent them out for a CLA. The 2.8C has nicer bokeh due to the 10 bladed aperture. But the 3.5F is more user-friendly: 1/500 can be selected when the shutter is cocked and the viewfinder is nicer and it's brighter too.
5:55 you can definitely see its more sharp on the outer edges with the Rollieflex, but that's not to say the Yashicaflex isn't a good camera.
Loved this review Hashem. Thanks for taking the time in reviewing the camera.
Much appreciated! Thanks for watching
Great camera, great shots! Glad to see the Agfa optima back ;)
What a privilege it is to be featured in a photo on Pushing Film ❤❤❤ great video as always Hashem
Haha thanks for posing 😁
I have the 2.8F and 3.5F and a serious advantage is the brightness of the screen. The 2.8 viewfinder is much brighter than the 3.5 one. The primary difference between the Yashica and the Rolleiflex is the build quality. Rolleiflex is built to a much higher standard and will therefore cost less over time than fixing up a Yashica, presuming you can even find someone to service the Yashica.
We have a great photo collection at our MOMA museum here in San Francisco, including many images by Rollei. The combo of waist level shooting and those beautiful silver loaded papers from the 1940's and 50's is something to behold along with the great eye of the photographers. I used my father's Rollei as a table prop in my short film noir, Bum Rap Andre Hunt
Take a look at the Mamiya C330 , you can change lenses and view finders options , cheap. I bought one new in 1978, still using it today.
Yeah, great camera!
Nice video! Thanks for sharing your Rolleiflex info.
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for this. I think I need to get out and use mine. I was given an almost mint F4 Wide version plus lots of accessories.I have put only one film through it and have not got to a lab with it yet.Good samples and comparison. This will be a new years resolution for me. cheers Geoff
Sounds like it's waiting for more use! Thanks for watching :-)
While I haven't used a Rolleiflex, I do really like my Olympus Flex B-II, which has a fabulous 2.8 F.Zuiko lens
Beautiful classic camera. I wish I had one.
Nice analysis and commentary. Thank you.
Much appreciated!
Loved the vid! I recently picked up my first TLR, the Airesflex Model U. The Rolleiflex is just too expensive for my budget right now. I definitely wanna try one now though.
Nice! Yeah they're worth trying, at least to see how they differ.
thank you for the nice video.....I just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5/75 in mint condition and I am about to use it for the first time....I will send the camera for a complete LCA soon just to make sure all is ok..The only thing not working is the light meter but I have been told that it is normal for a camera this old ......but its ok since I use an external SEKONIC light meter. Also its very hard for me to find a neck strap..but I am looking around. By the way I live in south italy....The camera has been used very little by the previous owner....and for 200 euros I could not pass it...!!!
Thanks for watching! Congrats on the purchase, separate metering might be more reliable anyway 🙂
I’d love to have one of these some day. Great photos, and another great video 👏👏
Thanks man! You should definitely try one some time
My 3.5F gets more attention than my m4, (I also changed the focusing screen with a newer and brighter one), great video as always
Nice! Thanks mate 😁
it really makes street photography easier. People spot you more often when you lift an slr or rangefinder to your eye
They spot you with the Rolleiflex as well but they just don't feel as disturbed by it.
I have a Yashica B. I love it and like the leaver to cock the clutter as it prevents me from accidentally taking a photo. I’ve worked out a system of winding the film forward after taking the shot. Then as I’m about to take the next shot I cock the shutter.
I have a 2.8c & 2.8d
Both Xenotar lens.
Although the 2.8c has 10 blade aperture, I vastly prefer the 2.8d due to the upgrades like EV lock, & unrestricted 1/500 versus the 2.8c.
I’ve traveled all over the world with my 2.8d. It’s my lifetime camera now
No way hahah, i litterly just finished scanning my first roll of 6x6 from my uncle's TLR just to see hashem post a new banger about rollei :) Going to make some popcorn for this one! merry xmas Hashem
Great vid Hashem! Been looking forward to this one.
I have a 3.5F, and between the paralax compensating finder mask, functional lightmeter, and character, it's quickly gone to the top of my favourite cameras to use.
Thanks man! That's good to hear
Having 2 models of 3.5f, it's so enjoyable to shoot street photography with them. it's small, light, and quiet.
Great video Hashem. Those Rollei's are just so nice to use. I shoot a baby grey 127 Rollei and absolutely love it even though it means hand cutting film, it gets used more than my other TLR being a Mamiya C220 which is also a great camera but doesn't have that Rollei 'feel' when using it.
Nice! Not many people are still spooling 127 🙂
Something about the Rolleiflex - people love it and often comment to me while I'm out shooting with it. The periscope design gives interest to pictures by having that low perspective, but can also be used upside down up high for a downward view (you must try if you haven't!!).
Nice video about a very special camera.
The Rolleiflex is very special to me. One of my favorite cameras and also Mediumformat camera i own. Its SO fun to use and it was one of the first cameras i wanted to get hold of once i returned to analog photography. The one i settled on was the Rolleiflex 75T, i liked the slightly wider lens and also the price was decent considering it was a newly serviced camera and a great range of accessories being a Bay 1 mount lens.
I have used mine a lot, and since i got it have several cool accessories for it i frequently use. Like the Rolinar 1 and 2, some filters and also looking to get a softfilter for it as well ( Rolleisoft) .
Funnily enough just a few days ago i was looking into getting another one, maybe this time an F model or a more expensive f2,8 E or C model. I heard the Xenotar lens is slightly more sharp and has even better character. But thus far i LOVE the images i get from my Tessar lens o nthe T. I have no lightmeter on mine but its fast to use and always give great exposures using the sunny 16 or a external light meter. No issues whatsoever.
The F2,8 also have a 80 mm lens, so that could be a great addition for even better portraits was my reasoning .
So yeh, i love the Rolleiflex and think i will always have one or two in my kit, its great for street, for landscape, for portraits, you name it. On the streets its like you say in the video an amazing conversation starter, and i never got any bad reactions thus far when i used it.
Nice 1 Hash :)
/regards Martin.
Glad to hear you enjoy the system too! Yeah I don't know how reliable those old meters would be anyway... Thanks as usual mate!
Going to take some photos at a play My daughter is in it and hope to get some fine images at their rehearsal. then the performance as the lights of the stage should be able to shot at a higher aputure and speed thanks for your reveiw
Good luck!
big fan of the TLR, don't currently have one at the minute but had a yashica mat 124g in the past and loved it.
Tried a rollei but prefer my Yashiva 635 / D setups. The usability is better and the images have more soul. Beautiful photos dude!
Thank you!
My camera shop just started developing 120 film in-house...now you've got me wondering if I should get a medium format camera that works :)
I inherited one from my dad. He bought it around 1955 while he was stationed in Germany during the US -Korean War. Haven't yet tried it. What is a good source for 120 film these days? And processing?
Great review on my trusty Rollei Hash!
Thanks for letting me use it! 😁
Just shot a roll on Thanksgiving with my Rollei 3.5 which I used to shoot weddings with in the 1970’s
Awesome!
I have never owned one but have shot with the 55mm and the 80 2.8.. Personally i think the ergonomics is terrible and although i like how lightweight it is and how quiet the leaf shutter is ,i just hate the double handling ....focus left side , change hands to shoot and wind on before changing back again to focus. Works fine on a tripod but terrible in the hand. I did love the Mamiya C330 though but its much bigger. I tend to think many are wearing rose tinted glasses when using some cameras.
I do have a Rolleiflex with the 3.5/75 Xenar lens (a 4 elements in 3 groups lens design), and it performs quite similarly to my Yashica Mat-124 G. The Schneider Xenotar design has 5 elements (similar to Zeiss Biometar), so it is different to the cheaper 3.5 lenses (including the Xenar). The 3.5 Planar might be different, but maybe also 5 elements, while the 2.8 Planar should be 6 elements and differ in rendering. I found the 3.5 Xenar to be already a nice lens, even though not "perfect" at 3.5. TLRs have their strengths (a rather robust construction), but I'm a bit undecided if I prefer folding cameras (my Agfa Super Isolette is much more compact, but framing is better with a TLR, while a 6x9 folding camera is something completely different).
One thing not mentioned about Rolleis and TLRS in general. When you press the shutter you take the picture right , away. When I use an SLR many times the picture comes out with the persons eyes closed.
cheers for the cool video. Very good amd i totally agree with all you said. can you tell me where to get the focus screens. The old one on my rolleiflex c is so dark so after 70 years an upgrade might be nice.
Another 6x6 TLR that's worth looking into is the Minolta Autocord.
Better lens than the Yashica, easier loading than the Rolleiflex.
But slightly harder to find.
Ikoflex serie from Carl Zeiss is better choice if you still want the German lens quality and slightly expensive than minolta but not like Rolleiflex/Rolleicord or Yashica
No one commenting on that perfectly kept Agfa Optima? Sometimes I wish I could have gotten to try Agfa Color film but it's about a lost cause nowadays.
Also absolutely beautiful shots. I particularly like those of your partner/wife, and a lot of the Medium format look with smoother tonality and DoF
I delved into TLRs with a Rolleicord, which might be a better comparison to the Rolleiflex as it's their own "Amateur" model. Actually quite interesting shootout with the Yashica, as I haven't had (to my eyes) that good luck with older 6x6 cameras with Tessar Types. WLF is nice, but my style of shooting is easier with a RF VF.
Thanks! Yeah that Agfa is quite rare now.
rolleiflex looks so nice.. I am not a fan of rolleiflex due to fixed lens, but the look of its camera is just beautiful..Thanks for the video!
Thanks Ryan!
If still want some German lens on TLR, I will try Ikoflex I/II/III for alternative cheaper than Rolleiflex/Rolleicord. For sure the price pay for quality from Rollei but not for me
I really like the Rolleiflex, a lot!! Until I can get one, I am making do with a cool old Ricohflex.
Nothing wrong with that!
Hashem ; : I have a Rollei Distgon 55mm F4 Wide , and the 75mm F3.5 . My 55mm W is new to me , and I am still learning its strengths and being a bit wider than the 75mm you can do amazing images. I like the E Model with light meter , though the dual range Light Meter is a new thing to me. The 55mm is superbly magical being solid , well built and a joy in the hands as well as pure design art. The 75mm 3.5 D has no light meter , so I use the phone metering , and I have taken many inspiring and amazing images with my D Model.
I have all 3 Rollenair close focus lenses , the #2 is mounted on the strap in the case , using the close focus lenses you can leap into another realm and expand the usefulness and it is sheer delight .... when your imaging with a 75mm Tessar lens. These are amazing cameras and are a joy to use compose with and just feel so good in hand. Nothing compares , even my M Leica's cannot compare to the 55mm F4 Distagon in terms of the feel of use. I love my Leica's and they are film , but for sheer delight and immersion in your Art ... it is ROLLEI all the way.
Sounds like a great setup!
I have a mamiya c33 and think its a better choice than the rolliflex interchangeable lenses, close focusing twice the camera at 1/3rd the price
Nice :-)
silly question, but does it fit in the Ona Bowery bag?
and How were you carrying it while not using?
Yeah it fits if you lay it down. I usually just carried it with the strap, but sometimes in the Brevite Jumper or Ona Bowery bag
Curious where you found/what are your lens attachments? Been having such a hard timing finding some
Hey, I'm not too sure since I borrowed the camera... But I think he got them on ebay
@@pushingfilm aw ok thanks! Great videos!
What coffee mug was that? The white one with black specks?
Hey, I don't know sorry! It was at a rental place. Nice mug though.
The 500th max really holds me back
The ONLY difference between a Rolleiflex 3.5 and 2.8 is the max aperture and thus the size of the taking lens. Obviously, for many that is worth the price difference. Yashicas are great. For me, a Rolleiflex is just mechanically more refined, especially with fast winding, etc. Feels durable and solid. I often use the wide angle lens adapter, giving me the equivalent of 35mm in ¨standard¨ film. I don't think this exists for Yashica. If the above is not important, buy a Yashica and spend the money you saved on film and coffee when you go out shooting.
The max aperture size doesn't tell the whole story. The 2.8 viewfinder is much much brighter than the 3.5. The 3.5 is almost a struggle to use in the corners.
in the meantime the prizes for 3.5 and 2.8 have completely reached the same level at least over here in Germany on ebay
I have Rolliflex but I have no idea how to use it
The only difference between the Rolleiflex 2,8 and 3,5. is the lens. I have never understood why especially in the USA, people are willing to pay so much more for the 2,8, less than one stop faster. Is it that the taking lens is larger, making the camera look better? The 2,8 is also heavier, because of the bigger lens.
Only one stop? Only the lens??
In the 1920s rollfilm was at ISO 20! Some even 10. By the end of the war at 64 and only by early 50ies Kodak went to 100/160 ISO.
400 ISO only came in 1967. That's why Weegee needed huge flash lights firing one bulb a photo (30ies & 40ies). So, one stop is huge, mate. Still today. Are you aware of both price and optical differences between f2.0/1.8/1.4/1.2 or noct even?
The Rolleiflex 2.8 was only for the US market (1949) while Europe got the 3.5. I assume that was because the US was ahead with press photography and thus could afford the more expensive cameras. Again WEEGEE. Look him up.
One more: Hollywood needed HUGE lights until the 60ies for that ISO issue, that's why the moved to Southern Cali in the first place, for sun. Studios then even had open roofs for sun.
Only one stop? Only the lens??
In the 1920s rollfilm was at ISO 20! Some even 10. By the end of the war at 64 and only by early 50ies Kodak went to 100/160 ISO.
400 ISO only came in 1967. That's why Weegee needed huge flash lights firing one bulb a photo (30ies & 40ies). So, one stop is huge, mate. Still today. Are you aware of both price and optical differences between f2.0/1.8/1.4/1.2 or noct even?
The Rolleiflex 2.8 was only for the US market (1949) while Europe got the 3.5. I assume that was because the US was ahead with press photography and thus could afford the more expensive cameras. Again WEEGEE. Look him up.
Fast lenses are made for low light, not for the aesthetics of blurry backgrounds, its just a side effe really. And as long as people shoot at daylight, and claim there is no difference, or only refer to depth of field as comparison, it is not the full story. Misleading in fact.
Hie there, i have a yashica 635 with all its accessories . I wouldn't trade it for anything.
Nice! I've heard only good things about that model
Makes me so mad the new digi Hassies don’t come with square sensors.
That would be interesting!
While they’re comparable in many ways, my yashica 635 did something a Rollie could never, it cost $35
Checked Ebay, not anymore.
Tlr best for street. Its very discreet system. More discreet than even rangefinder.
Comparing a Yashica to a Rolleiflex is like comparing a Ford to a Bentley. They will both get you where you are going at 60 miles an hour.
More like a BMW and a Toyota. But yes, many people including myself are interested in such things 😁