📺 It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'Shiver' bit.ly/3qdjVLQ
In 1989 I had 3 possible 4 encounters with Sasquatch here in Herrin in Southern Illinois. I just moved out here from the Mojave desert in California in November 1987. I had spent my previous 17 years living out in the Mojave Desert. It was November of 87 when I arrived here. In the spring of 1988, I was eager eighteen-year-old wanting to explore the woods for the first time. I ventured to the outskirts in Herrin buy a railroad. Right at the edge of the woods was a tipi structure made out of wood with a big tree in the very center of it. This big tree had several big long branches broke off and leaned against the trunk in the very center. There was vines interweaving with leaves between all the branches. I walked over to the opening in the front there was about 7- 8-inches of brush in the bottom with long brownish red hair everywhere. I picked up a handful of hair about 8 to 10 in Long, looked at it and thought to myself. .. this must be a deer bed?" I know that sounds ridiculous but I just had spent my whole life in the Mojave Desert. The only thing I ever experienced where lizards, snakes, coyotes and maybe an occasional scorpion, I was not looking for a Bigfoot at all. I ended up not going out there until 1989. This time while I was in the woods, the creature was 25 feet away from me and I didn't know it. It took off running away from me. It sounded like it was as heavy as a horse, only it was running on two legs. It was only 25 to 30 ft away from me. I turned to look at it and all I could see was Cattail grass parting but, I could not see any creature. It had to have been invisible because, it was right there & I could not see it! I could see the grass moving, the sound was so close to me that the ground was shaking like when a horse runs. I could not see it & there is no reason why. I should have been able to see it. I could not understand it ? I ran for my life to get away from it! I went back out there with a friend around 4 1/2 hours later. I explain to my friend what happen earlier , he told me that it sounded like it was the Big Muddy monster. I asked him what is the Big Muddy monster? He said you know, Bigfoot . We found a trail with several 18in long human-looking foot prints. Around 7.5 in wide.
I could do with a lot less of the sarcastic, smug skeptics in these shows. It's quite possible to state one's disbelief without inferring that those who do believe are rank idiots. I can't help but wonder why that was not curtailed by this show's production staff.
Yes I agree but there are two sides, I'm a sceptic but still open minded but the thing that gets me is, in comment sections I put a respectful and polite comment and the amount of abuse I get from believers is unbelievable and I mean just out and out abuse. I'm well read and got a modicum of intelligence and some of the abuse given out is actually shocking. So just saying. Respect from England 🤗👍🏴
Anyone who looks at the creature in the PGF and says, "it's a man in a costume" is either woefully ignorant, or being disingenuous. As most know, we can see muscle movement, breasts, hand movement and much more including a hernia on the leg. MK Davis has done great work showing this. If it's a hoax, it's the greatest hoaxed piece of film ever.
You'll often see a misquote attributed to John Chambers (the man who did the make-up effects for the Planet of the Apes films) claiming credit. What Chambers actually said was he didn't know how it was done, though he did feel it was some sort of costume the man at the very peak of effects work in Hollywood at the time wasn't able to explain how such a suit could have been made.
“Sasquatch Chronicles Podcast” is a good source if anybody wants to hear some really interesting testimonies from people all over the world who’ve had encounters with the, B-Foot.😁👍
I find it VERY unlikely that 2 men from the 60's (if they were planning on faking a bigfoot video) would decide to make a FEMALE sasquatch and add breasts to the "suit." I really don't think it would have crossed their minds. If someone had suggested it, I'm pretty sure they would have thought it was a horrible idea. That's just a thought, but I feel it's most likely true. It has always added credibility for me. Among other things.
Yeah, but Roger Patterson had motivation to do the film...He set out to look for one, then he already had a book/pamphlet written about one. I thought it was real at first, then someone mentioned the breasts which if faked looked very real !! Still if you had a gun with you wouldn't you shoot it ??
believe all women.... could have been a pregnant male sasquatch.... smh bro over here white knighting for sasquatch. she's not gonna sleep with you.....
Pictures ? What pictures? Blurred videos and poor quality pictures you mean. In other words Fakes. Bigfoot does not exist, no DNA evidence, no bodies, no scatt, no hair fibres. Nothing, a big fat zero.
4 года назад+5
Then show us a convincing one then ! You can't can you !
@@STHFGDBY when all they have to do is call it a hoax, one wonders how you have any kind of argument, because you're simply accepting one person's word over another, appeals to authority are a logical fallacy
And all that evidence does exist. LOL, Paterson Gimlin film, Minnesota ice man, Freeman footage, thousands of casts, hairs, bones, skulls, and on top of that thousands upon thousands of witnesses across decades, all describing near identical behaviours, police, judges, game wardens, you name it. Oh but you know right, you're like God of all that can and cant be real, you're especially credible, more credible than ten thousand others who have apparently more to offer the world than you and your faux intellectual superiority
Just show us a clear, still, legible, in-focus picture (oh yea, less than 2 miles away....). We all "want" BF to be real, but we all want Santa Claus to be real too....
Even if I concede MOST are hoaxes/mis-IDs, there are still so many that are credible sightings of something new. There have been too many hunters/outdoorsmen with good reputations and credible stories for me to dismiss them. I think it would behoove the scientific community to do a real search of the Pacific Northwest; months in the forests with concentrated efforts.
@@scotthull2141 Yes Humans co-existed with other large homind's that's the truth rooted in these myths, Folklore passed down from generation to generation.
The one I saw ruined the outdoors for 20 years. Still paranoid in the woods and wish it never happened. You want to talk about it but friends and family think you are lying or nuts..So you tend to just keep it inside.
@@chuckythedoll4815 Another great review, Cecil. Party Line...I haven't seen that movie, but I'll give it a watch, if only to see Lief Garrett in a wedding dress. Check out Night of the Lepus; it's a '70s monster flick about giant killer bunnies, crazy and daft, but entertaining nonetheless. I'm looking forward to the next Good Bad Flicks video. Keep up the good work, dude.
So this guys saw something that scared him so much he was never the same in the forest again. Pleas explain what could’ve scared him so bad. A bear? Please.
Pretty good vid. Makes me want to visit Willow Creek. The one real negative in this one is Keith Bensen who like your usual "scientist" is full of himself and thinks he knows it all. My answer to his question is that Sasquatch is smarter than he thinks he is ...by far.
Erm, no. If you want bigfoot to get into the book of life then type specimens have to come to light. If you don't care about inconveniences like empiricism and evidence then call it belief, not "proof". I, for one, would love bigfoot to be real, it's an intriguing plausibility, but wanting it to be real does not equate to "proof" or existence. Cheers!
True, but it also has to do with people in this day and age are usually not open minded and are quick to be judgemental. Until they have that interaction and they end up on the other side. One only knows what they're eyes see and ears hear. It's not all roses seeing or being near one and it's not something claimed for attention. At least in my case, I wish I never heard of it at all.
I believe the Patterson film 100% without a shadow of a doubt I live in Australia and in 1990 , I came face to face with a very nasty and territorial, yowie a stupid name I think but that's what they call the creature this is a absolute cousin of big foot our siteings was in the blue mountains national park west of sydney about 3to 4hrs into our hike there it was it was not a encounter I'll ever forget but we walked out of the park alive but I have never gone camping in the bush since and still 31yrs on every day think about the encounter the wicked smell, the fear , and the nitemares good luck getting the evidence we will need but you know I really don't care weather anyone believes me for myself and mate it was a reality and if any of these prominant scientists ever have a face to face encounter they simply wouldn't compute with them cheers from australia God bless
Had a similar experience in the Blue Mountains back in the late 90's. Didn't see it but 'felt it', heard it and smelt it. Will never forget as long as I live.
@@maricvernon6152 mark really happy to see your reply in a strange way I'm relieved someone else has made contact with these buggers unfortunately my mate committed suicide back in 2006 in a unrelated incident ,he would never talk about it with anyone but personally it's a big relief that all these people have had encounters like us I have never forgotten comeing face to face ,the creatures can be very nasty could be a loner maybe but I felt there were more around us as we got out of thier , thanks for your reply cheers phill
I believe that the Sasquatch is real. It's some of the people that claim to have seen him that I think are fake! The Patterson/ Gimlin Film is 100% real it has proven the test of time. Everything on that film has been scrutinized; the gait, the arm length to body, the stride, hair movement, bulges in the muscle, the sagittal crest head, the turning of the complete head NOT the neck, the circumstance as to how this was filmed and that there was no technology to create such an elaborate costume for a human to fit into it and have the arm length and size the walk in that fashion. The stride is unique. Observe the knees and how they bend as they creature walks and the arm swings!! Further, it has been examined by anthropologists such as Dr. Krantz, Dr. Meldrum, and even skeptics like Dr. Sarmiento. It is compelling and authentic in every way you view it. Science and the government know it is real but there too many issues that will occur if the Scientific community recognize the species. The lumber industry for one would have to decrease its' harvesting of trees if the Sasquatch habitat is declared off limits.
I've noticed that all debunkers , of any subject, find it impossible not to smirk while telling you there's 'no scientific proof'. They seem to be able to ignore accounts , testimony , casts , etc. while pointing to fake 'proof' as proof of lack of proof . I think they have found a lazy way to appear cleverer than they are .
The DNA investigated by Dr Ketchum also went to 3 laborarories and one at least was the FBI's. They were stunned and asked her if she had found a new animal. There was no talk of "ANOMALIES".
Well if that's really the case someone should tell the universities that did the double blind studies. Or we can copy paste vague opinions and pretend like we know anything about the topic
@@thetruthchannel349 yep.and considering the federal govt is now admitting UFOs are real, maybe somebody should reveal what the govt knows about sasquatch. They know more than they admit. And they have a way of spreading the bogus “it was a bear,”: story anytime there’s a body and a witness.
I SAW PLANET OF THE APES AT ABOUT AGE 5 AND AT THAT AGE I JUST COULDNT GET INTO IT BECAUSE AS GOOD, PROFESSIONAL AND HIGH-TECK (for the time) THE MOVIE JUST COULD NOT DO FOR ME, A FIVE YEAR OLD, WHAT MOVIES ARE SUPPOSED TO DO......ITS CALLED “ SUSPENSION OF DIS-BELIEF” THE POINT BEING TO MAKE YOU FORGET ITS JUST PEOPLE IN MAKEUP AND MONKEY SUITS.......... WHEN I SAW THE PATTERSON GIMLIN FILM, I KNEW 100% THE BIGFOOT WAS REAL, I THINK YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE AN IDIOT IF YOU SPENT JUST A FEW DAYS LOOKING INTO IT AND CONCLUDED THAT THAT FILM, THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CREDIBLE EYE WITNESS REPORTS, THE MILLIONS OF FOOTPRINTS AND TRACKWAYS, ALL THE REAL ACTUAL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF AN UN-ADMITTED TO APEX PREDAOR, ..... IS ALL HAOXES AND MISTAKES THAT IS SO LUDICROUS IT LEAVES ME SPEECHLESS, AND THESE OBVIOUS SHILLS OR DELUSIONAL SKEPTICS SEEM DEMENTED TO ME ....... LETS NOT FORGET, 99.99999999999 OF THE REPORTS AND EVIDENCE CAN BE 100% WRONG, ONLY ONE OF THEM HAS TO BE RIGHT ...... OH THE POOR SHEEPLE
A creature like that attacked the cabin of my great-grand-mother in the 20s...in the depths of Amazon jungle. She was very old when she told me the whole story in 1994. I could read and feel and see the fear in her eyes...as if it had just happened. Two months later she died. 😢 She knew that these things exist.
They're covering it up because of the billions involved in the land they occupy, the oil rigs, the mines, the logging, military bases and testing ranges. Even if you find a body, they will swap it out for you; 2 bodies, 1 real black one, 1 fake brown one ruclips.net/video/juZfnwzqtQw/видео.html
If you wish to be taken seriously then don't conflate the facts by saying that there have been hundreds of thousands of sightings and millions of tracks. Maybe a few thousand sightings and several thousand tracks. Still significant, but lets keep it real.
At 29 minutes the " thoughtful " critic say " Gigantopithicus (fossils) found in Africa " . Dude doesn't even know the teeth were found in China . C'mon man!
@@bluedogsurvive6501 I don't think so but if you have a link, I would be very greatfull. My memory could be failing me. It wouldn't be the first time. I do seem to remember that the teeth are kept in Germany.
@@cats-cool398 That was more garbage. Hominids and pongids are not a direct line. We share ancestors, but the two are divergent. A hominid is not an ape and an ape is not a hominid.
two words government coverup they make sure you saw a bear as the animal you just hit with your car is wisked away and in canada they take you to border and tell you you are no longer welcome in canada and your insurance only covers bears sasquatch would be an economic disaster
Whisked. Ps please use punctuation, punctuation is “a courtesy designed to help readers to understand a text/story without stumbling”. (Eats Shoots & Leaves by Lynne Truss).
Question for Dr Johnson: food acceptance/habituation to the point of them watching you preform a singing recital and not a single trail cam photo? Gopro strapped to your body? Hair or scat or saliva from the eating area?
For some reason, tail cameras don't work too take pics of them. It's unknown why, but a lot of people believe that they can see the infrared and avoid the tail cams altogether. I lean towards that as well, but can't say honestly. But there are very few pics from them. I believe there are a couple but not many. There was somebody that used mirrors and trail cams and was reported to have gotten some pics. And I'm not sure exactly how you would get a saliva sample!? Good luck with that, lol!
@@conalcochranh3274 how do you explain over 11,000 REPORTED sightings in North America? That's not including the unreported sightings. How can someone in New York, report the same thing as say someone in California? And yes this was before the internet! Think snit that. Even if 1%of the stories are true, then it exists. Explain the P-G film that has survived scrutiny for over 50 years, by scientists, special fx artists and the like? Not one can say that, that footage is a hoax, none. Also, explain away dermal ridges found in for casts, that are pretty much like footprints. They all can't be hoaxes. Impossible. Dr. Jeff Meldrum has over 3,000 casts that he has proven to be real. And he's a for morphologist, that's his primary study! That's pretty much ALL he studies, but your right, he's probably lying he's based his whole career on the study of feet and ancient foot casts for over 20+ years, but what would be know, right!? He's just a noted scientist known worldwide, and the leading expert in that area... but.. I'm sure you could prove him wrong with all of your wisdom. There's plenty more evidence, but I'll just stop with that. I'm sure you have a logical explain for all of these things, correct?
Keith Benson (wildlife biologist) love the condescending tone as he completely fails when talking about Gigantopithecus; China, India yes, Africa no. Doesn't help your argument.
he is also very condescending when he makes the claim about the forests having been completely explored because we have logger throughout the vast American forests 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
I think intentional burials would be found before random deaths. Giganto has never had bones other than jaws and teeth found. And it existed in several countries across 6 million years.
i use both google chrome and microsoft edge gotto settings if you use Edge go to settings then select extensions there two Free pre installed ad blockers just slide button the right to enable i neve rhave seen a ad on yt since it also blocks most pop ups on other sites.
I am a "knower". I had an encounter in 1980 while in the military. I think they are hard to catch up to and film because they are so much faster than us and very smart. When they hear us come in forest, they can easily elude us by taking off or going underground (caves), where i believe they live. We need to get serious and spend the money to explore caves and get enough people out there to make it happen. not likely though, would cost millions.
I hope they never let us find them. If we do, we'll destroy them just like we've destroyed everything else we've ever touched. Humanity is the monster. Please God protect them from us.
There is coming a day when we will need protection from them. They are a biological construct of the Anunaki of Sumerian lore. Read the Epic of Gilgamish with his sidekick Enkidu who is the ancestor of the Sasquatch. They have close ties with UFOs and the paranormal.
They defintely know we are in general, trouble, that's why they typically hide from us. If we don't immediately slow down man's corporate negative effect on our environment we will destroy them and us whether we "find" them or not.
Dr. Johnson has took this subject to far by bringing people in the woods to get healed by these creatures. He has hurt people with his actions. They guy should not have a medical license.
@James Wimer Idk much about him or his work beyond what I've literally mentioned, that hes an unusually tall person and holds a degree in psychology so Id be ignorant to comment on anything else, but I do know that no one can be manipulated unless they want to be and an idiot with an education is still just an educated idiot. Ppl who have "zero critical thinking skills" have more problems than being lied to. Thats the problem with this subject, hell, almost ANY subject, the gamut runs from the sincere, to the insane, to the con-men, to the naive to the doubters, to the angry and on and on. Personally, if I were that disgusted or bothered, I'd do all I could to stop it and i suppose informing ppl is a method of combating what he does, but he or no one else is manipulating me, or you, by the sound of it, so i have to ask: have you told anyone whom he has manipulated?
Thousands beyond Thousands beyond Thousands have come out and told there encounters.That even the Native’s Have told there True Story’s about them.In Australia they have there Story’s of them beyond what Americans know about them.It is a Big Yes because I have seen them and know so much about them.They are not all a like meaning with that.Some Like of us and there is some who dislike us and for good reason they should.
@@NattyBumppo48 Wow, that must suck to not believe in all those animals you haven't seen. Just imagine how great your world would be if you believed in all those deep water fishes and creatures that are "found" every day. The "Billy Ape", and the new relative of the Giraffe found in the forests of Vietnam. Weird how all those soldiers out there in the war didn't see them. Ah hell they must not be there right. Just think of all those Wooly Mammoths, Giant Elk, Giant Buffalo, Sabre tooth Tigers, Cave Bears, Dinosaurs and the such your missing out. Oh well, I think I'll go to the Zoo tommorow and see a Gorilla that people like you said were imaginary up until the early 1900s. Maybe they will have a six foot long chelacamph that was extinct for 6 million years. That will be fun for the grandkids I suppose.
@@mattmoilanen3813 So unicorns and flying monkees must be real to..... Look, just because a chunk of society "wants" something to be real doesn't make it so. Pretty much everyone has a cell phone w/camera these days so.... take a credible photo and show me. Surely out of the thousands of people walking around with cell phones, someone could get a reasonably solid pic. And by "reasonably solid" I mean something a normal person with no recurring big foot dreams could look at and say "yep, that's a BF". Until then, I suppose guys like me will argue with guys like you. Thus the BF controversy perpetuates itself.....
I walk thru forests alone looking at broken branches and items that these Bigfoot people would claim was done by a Bigfoot. It's just the natural landscape.
I used to be a firm believer that they were out there, and there were many of them. As the years have passed, I see the same old shows, same old footage, same old print casts. I just cannot believe with virtually everyone on earth having an HD camera in their pocket at all times, we cannot get any new clear, credible footage. The woods in the fall are filled with HD game cameras that snap on motion, yet you rarely see any bigfoot shots on them either, and if you do, it is blurry "arm" or "leg", where pictures of squirrels and raccoons are crystal clear. I really hope they are real, I just feel at this point, I would almost have to see one myself before I truly believed.
@@laura-kn9qf Not necessarily. I have been an avid outdoorsman my entire life. Spent tons of time in the woods and on the waters. I have seen a grand total of TWO black bears during my life. Just because something is real does not mean it is common. I see bald eagles once or twice per year too, and I know they are real.
@@laura-kn9qf Right. I am not saying they are real, or even probable. My first comment said exactly that. I was only taking issue with your point that if they are real, they would be spotted all over and be common. I know bears are real etc, but I do not see them like squirrels or deer. Now figure on a high order primate who has a natural tendency to avoid man and how often would those be spotted? I have always said if 99% of the pictures and accounts are fake, there is still that 1% that are not. I am not betting my house they exist for certain, but I haven't totally dismissed the possibility, at least for now.
Maybe you cant find them because your not looking in the right places. They migrate, and the government would never let evidence be known to the public. It would cause so many problems. So even if he did find something he couldn't talk about it.
Yes, Tom and when the One is found again…is my client. I’ll represent him/her/it in civil court suing for all Bigfoot revenue in memorabilia, movies, documentaries for the past 50 years. It will be more famouser than ever, living in a giant mansion (‘scuse the pun) in town in Willow Creek, where alcohol and pot is more accessible. And just maybe finally lead a normal life.
I believe the Patterson-Gimlin film is real. You can see Patty's muscles underneath her shiny fur as she walks away. I don't think that if someone made a costume they would make one with breasts. A retired Hollywood costume maker said they would not have the technology in 1967 to make a costume that looked like Patty. Just check out the movie "Planet of the Apes" costumes. There is no comparison.
the video starts off good, and then the critics show up with no proof that people are lying. When you accuse people are lying, the burden of proof is on you
I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy. Get out of here. - Mitch Hedberg
Streufert went all "Gollam and The Precious" with that giant scanned image off the real of Gymlins Girl ..why isn't there a Sasquatch emoji in my phone, dag it? ... it's a real thing
I don't mind listening to the stories that people experience. I don't like those who have not experienced it, calling people who do, liars! 😡 That's like me saying, "DID YOU KNOW AUSTRALIA DOESN'T EXIST?!? I've never seen it! & No matter how many genuine pictures you show me, THAT PROVES NOTHING! I've never seen it, THEREFORE, IT DOESN'T EXIST!" Or, "I can't say anything, because these ppl in government who are trained to lie, & would pass a polygraph test like a cake walk, have threatened me."
Just a point.. I would think that those with sceptical minds who demand scientific evidence probably don't believe in the after life or reincarnation either. Like I said..just a point. 😀
@@gwmitchell1980 Thats right. You are correct. It's called being intelligent. How can reincarnation exist for instance if there are more people on the planet today than there was yesterday?
conal cochranh3 , you say you exist but is belief in your existence because of peoples visual proof, they have seen you, some have had physical contact with you. So has everyone else in the world visually confirmed your existence? Or do they believe you exist due to small evidences , pictures, eyewitnesses 🤔 all of which can easily be tampered with and obviously eyewitness can’t be trusted...that’s fine that you don’t believe in the existence of things unseen but just because you haven’t experienced or visually confirmed the mysteries of this vast planet does not mean the monsters of this place need your belief to exist. P.s I hope you continue happily in your confined comfortable cozy matrix world, 👹👽👾😈🤖👀
I was walking my golden retriever along a path in the woods once and I saw him staring at me. I could only see him from his waist up. I said "It's nice weather we're having" and he grunted at me. At first I assumed he was just an extremely unattractive man with no shirt on. I then looked down at my golden retriever and she looked liked she had melted into the ground with her two scared brown eyes staring up at me. As I glanced down, I could near his foot steps running away. After that, I suddenly felt really unnerved and we left as fast as we could. That was it.
I find the Patterson Bigfoot film fascinating. Forget about scientists and biologists. The special effects masters from the films “Planet of the Apes” and “Congo” have all stated that even today, they could not re-create a costume of that size, muscular detail and movements, capable of allowing a man to stride across 200 yards of broken terrain. The gentleman from “Congo” went as far as to say, I don’t know what kind of creature that is - but it most definitely is not a man in a suit.
I live in the south surrounded by forest & I've Personally heard it All & the one chance I had to actually See Him up on a ridge top deep in the woods looking down at me But I was afraid to make eye contact. So me & five dogs with the hair standing up started slowly walking Backwards & the turned & ran like hell with the dogs because I didn't want to be left behind & gobbled up.
I hope this works... It goes work. If you put in a starting point, and then hit "directions", a red flag will pop up on the map, CBS you can zoom in, or simply follow the directions.! Patterson-Gimlin Film Location maps.app.goo.gl/YD9dfPRUnFi2zzzR7
It makes me curious about if there were any UFO sightings in and around the same area. People from Pennsylvania back in 1974 I believe it was when UFO sightings were definitely connected to sasquatch like creatures according to the eyewitness testimony which includes police officers a property owner who had called the police when he had an encounter with something out of a sci fi nightmare??? I actually believe that there is something to that claim and could explain why you don't find any bodies also could explain the people who have claimed to see Bigfoot in the exact same location at and during the same time frame ? I bet if they took this serious they would learn about more than tall whites lol.
Robert Morse is marginalizing Ketchums work, shes far more capable than he is and not likely to make stupid comments and mistakes in regards the DNA from the samples sent to her, over 200 samples if memory serves! The people who helped are all above reproach and are very credible, and the wording of her finding was "half human female with unidentifiable Male DNA", not quite what Morse said it was!
Try Bigfoot eyewitness radio, Vic Cundiff is great at helping witnesses come to terms with an encounter. I would also point out there is even worse out there, namely Dogman
Im not trying to bee over critical but its the other way around; some are definitely hoaxes, not some "may":be hoaxes. I have never had an encounter myself but I still believe! I also believe you and I would like to hear no about your encounter if you don't mind sharing?
Undiscovered primates is definitely possible. Gorillas weren't even discovered till 1902. But a dogman...I do not believe in. Maybe just maybe what people are seeing is a demon??
29:21 Africa? Wait.... gigantopithecus was not found in Africa but south east asia.... and they only found teeth... moulders if I got it correct in my memories. Maybe they found more fragments but it was in today China....
It's only a matter of time before some more substantial evidence is produced. These are extremely intelligent creatures. If anyone wants to see some Yowie (Australian Bigfoot) evidence-tree breaks/structures, check out my camping videos👣.
Matthew Johnson has slowly discredited himself because he talks as if he’s two people and he was so rude to so many before his book came out because he wanted everybody to come to him and believe in him saying that thousands came through a portal is ludicrous he’s delusional and he is a pompous.
That's what I've always thought. Some indigenous Americans describe them as cannibals but people always assume it means they eat us. Incidentally these are often the same people that insist it's just an unknown species of great ape
They do bury their dead, they're like giant scared Indians, they're terrified of us and for good reason, but they know our limits and use them to their advantage. They're also very curious about us, and hence are most often seen peeking in windows. Main thing to know if you bump into one is usually they will reflect your behaviour, but if you entered their territory, and they dont want you around, best to leave, stone throwing is them politely showing you the door
@@uncannyvalley2350 ''They'' ..... You seem to know an awful lot about a fictional character. I'll say it again ... If you bury ANYTHING in the woods, it is only a matter of time before a) predators dig it up to eat, and b) growing tree roots effectively push up the bones. You are speaking rubbish and spouting it as if you are some kind of professor on the subject hahahaha.
I believe these entities are dimentional or spiritual beings.. Undoubtedly they are real...they are a global/cultural phenomenon... witnessed throughout History by many different types of people...
Every person who was in this video presented themselves and thier point of view very well especially the lovely lady in the museum and yes my darling including the yowie I always believed the yowie was a wives tail untile I came face to face with one very agressive individual in the blue mountains national park west of sydney here in Australia I litterally walked into this big fella,s territory with my mate in 1990 as agressive as these creatures can be they need our help yes investigate them but please don't Willy nilly hunt them they egsist cheers to all our brothers and sisters in the u.s.a. love from Australia
The Patterson Gimlin Film has been proven not to be a man in a suit by Bill Munn's (a respected costume and makeup designer). He breaksnit down with Science and his experience you can read his book, When Patty Met Roger or listen to him on William Jevning's podcast Creek Devil episodes 34 - 35
I thought is wise that this show didn't tell how Dr Johnson also believes these creatures have the ability to mindspeak telepathically and jump through portals and can become invisible at will. Dr Johnson is a quack who needs to talk a psychiatrist himself! ROFL!
william smith Lol mate exactly my thought. I saw an interview with him once and the whole encounter sounded legit with tears and everything but then he went on about portals and powers and I was like oh hell no. 😂
The woo factor just ruins it for me. How about a specimen before going off on all these wild tangents. The only extra dimensional creature that can pop up suddenly and scare you is my ex...
Good observation, however Dr. Meldrum and Dr. Sarmiento both observe that Bear carcasses are not found that readily either. Nature will dissolve the bones, hair and skin. If the Sasquatch is a hominid then they could bury their dead as well. Remember the Gorilla was a myth until the early 1800's.
>what is the scientific method. Thats a really dumb quote, and thats why nobody will remember sagan for his work on the scientific field, but as the prefered ad verecundiam of edgy teens.
A Yowie is quite different to a bigfoot. Yowies and Bunyips have NEVER been described as ape like. They are more closely related to a Quinkin and are dark spirits more than they are an ape man.
Oh I'm the king of the swingers man The jungle VIP I reached the top and had to stop And that what's been bothering me I want to be a man mancub And stroll right into town And be just like the other men I'm tired of monkeying around!
I always feel like as I am watching videos with a guy talking Bigfoot that 2 guys in white suits will soon walk in and say ok visiting hours are up. Time to take your meds.
Well, Sir, the reason why you can find small, extremely rare animals and not Sasquatch is that the latter is too intelligent for camera traps, and is a consummate camouflage hider. Sorry about that syntax. Anyway, I’ve seen all kinds of animals notice camera traps on game trails within seconds, even though the cameras have no lights and emit very little sound. But then, if the individual cameras only hummed a bit, the animals would likely hear them, bc their hearing is much better than ours. Then, I’ve seen video footage of an animal taller than 6 feet who breathed a little hard, and was smart enough to stand off to one side as it disabled a camera, so you can’t see what it is, but it had very large, dexterous fingers. I don’t think your tiny rare animals could do that, just sayin.’
My favorite Bigfoot stories go like this: "I know what I saw, and it wasn't a bear." I think most people who have spent any time in the woods know the difference between an upright walking bear and a large bipedal hairy creature. Unfortunately, the evidence to date has not conclusively supported their stories.
@plaguelock People identify things wrongly at normal times of day, whilst staring at whatever the thing is. In situations such as these, people tend to see whatever it is for a split second in low light whilst running away fearing for their life. It's only normal that most of these sightings would be misidentified bears or other animals. Even hunters or woodsmen can misidentify things. To say all the sightings are correct and true is ridiculous.
@@uncannyvalley2350 You're saying this as if hunters have never killed a human by mistake. Hunters often go for days without sleep accounting for many MANY errors. I can back what I'm saying up by factual evidence. Can you? hahahahaha. Idiot.
Patterson was running with the camera to try and keep up with the creature, who was walking very nonchalantly. He couldn’t do it. Man in a suit???? Doubt it!
📺 It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'Shiver' bit.ly/3qdjVLQ
In 1989 I had 3 possible 4 encounters with Sasquatch here in Herrin in Southern Illinois. I just moved out here from the Mojave desert in California in November 1987. I had spent my previous 17 years living out in the Mojave Desert. It was November of 87 when I arrived here. In the spring of 1988, I was eager eighteen-year-old wanting to explore the woods for the first time. I ventured to the outskirts in Herrin buy a railroad. Right at the edge of the woods was a tipi structure made out of wood with a big tree in the very center of it. This big tree had several big long branches broke off and leaned against the trunk in the very center. There was vines interweaving with leaves between all the branches. I walked over to the opening in the front there was about 7- 8-inches of brush in the bottom with long brownish red hair everywhere. I picked up a handful of hair about 8 to 10 in Long, looked at it and thought to myself. .. this must be a deer bed?" I know that sounds ridiculous but I just had spent my whole life in the Mojave Desert. The only thing I ever experienced where lizards, snakes, coyotes and maybe an occasional scorpion, I was not looking for a Bigfoot at all.
I ended up not going out there until 1989. This time while I was in the woods, the creature was 25 feet away from me and I didn't know it. It took off running away from me. It sounded like it was as heavy as a horse, only it was running on two legs. It was only 25 to 30 ft away from me. I turned to look at it and all I could see was Cattail grass parting but, I could not see any creature. It had to have been invisible because, it was right there & I could not see it! I could see the grass moving, the sound was so close to me that the ground was shaking like when a horse runs.
I could not see it & there is no reason why. I should have been able to see it. I could not understand it ? I ran for my life to get away from it!
I went back out there with a friend around 4 1/2 hours later. I explain to my friend what happen earlier , he told me that it sounded like it was the Big Muddy monster. I asked him what is the Big Muddy monster? He said you know, Bigfoot . We found a trail with several 18in long human-looking foot prints. Around 7.5 in wide.
Should have reported it.
I could do with a lot less of the sarcastic, smug skeptics in these shows. It's quite possible to state one's disbelief without inferring that those who do believe are rank idiots. I can't help but wonder why that was not curtailed by this show's production staff.
I totally agree with you 💯%.
Completely agreed as well
I have never seen a Sasquatch, but Do believe they are real,,,somethings! Have encountered UFO craft that made no sense.
Yes I agree but there are two sides, I'm a sceptic but still open minded but the thing that gets me is, in comment sections I put a respectful and polite comment and the amount of abuse I get from believers is unbelievable and I mean just out and out abuse. I'm well read and got a modicum of intelligence and some of the abuse given out is actually shocking. So just saying. Respect from England 🤗👍🏴
Especially when the skeptic explanations don't hold water.
Anyone who looks at the creature in the PGF and says, "it's a man in a costume" is either woefully ignorant, or being disingenuous. As most know, we can see muscle movement, breasts, hand movement and much more including a hernia on the leg. MK Davis has done great work showing this. If it's a hoax, it's the greatest hoaxed piece of film ever.
You'll often see a misquote attributed to John Chambers (the man who did the make-up effects for the Planet of the Apes films) claiming credit. What Chambers actually said was he didn't know how it was done, though he did feel it was some sort of costume the man at the very peak of effects work in Hollywood at the time wasn't able to explain how such a suit could have been made.
The PGF footage is a hoax...obviously.
@@Carandini No, I prefer egg & onion, also chicken & ham. Why do you ask?
@@conalcochranh3274 How do you explain the clear bicep separation on the right arm? How did they do that in 1967?
@@conalcochranh3274 Theres only one fact needed here.
That is that you're another liar just like many others.
“Sasquatch Chronicles Podcast” is a good source if anybody wants to hear some really interesting testimonies from people all over the world who’ve had encounters with the, B-Foot.😁👍
True that episode 215 Is one of the best ! Love SAQ.C.!!
Listen to it everyday.
How can one have an encounter with something that doesn't exist? Please explain...
I love to listen to people's encounters with Bigfoot.
@@rachelschwebach7566 Why?
I find it VERY unlikely that 2 men from the 60's (if they were planning on faking a bigfoot video) would decide to make a FEMALE sasquatch and add breasts to the "suit." I really don't think it would have crossed their minds. If someone had suggested it, I'm pretty sure they would have thought it was a horrible idea. That's just a thought, but I feel it's most likely true. It has always added credibility for me. Among other things.
Yeah, but Roger Patterson had motivation to do the film...He set out to look for one, then he already had a book/pamphlet written about one. I thought it was real at first, then someone mentioned the breasts which if faked looked very real !! Still if you had a gun with you wouldn't you shoot it ??
I agree, that is a very significant point. Thanks.
Sasquatch don't exist...deal with it.
believe all women.... could have been a pregnant male sasquatch....
smh bro over here white knighting for sasquatch. she's not gonna sleep with you.....
They do exist. Deal with it. @conalcochranh3274
No other images ever gotten??? Are you crazy? There are tons of pictures! Do the research!
Pictures ? What pictures? Blurred videos and poor quality pictures you mean. In other words Fakes. Bigfoot does not exist, no DNA evidence, no bodies, no scatt, no hair fibres. Nothing, a big fat zero.
Then show us a convincing one then ! You can't can you !
@@STHFGDBY when all they have to do is call it a hoax, one wonders how you have any kind of argument, because you're simply accepting one person's word over another, appeals to authority are a logical fallacy
And all that evidence does exist. LOL, Paterson Gimlin film, Minnesota ice man, Freeman footage, thousands of casts, hairs, bones, skulls, and on top of that thousands upon thousands of witnesses across decades, all describing near identical behaviours, police, judges, game wardens, you name it. Oh but you know right, you're like God of all that can and cant be real, you're especially credible, more credible than ten thousand others who have apparently more to offer the world than you and your faux intellectual superiority
Just show us a clear, still, legible, in-focus picture (oh yea, less than 2 miles away....). We all "want" BF to be real, but we all want Santa Claus to be real too....
Even if I concede MOST are hoaxes/mis-IDs, there are still so many that are credible sightings of something new. There have been too many hunters/outdoorsmen with good reputations and credible stories for me to dismiss them. I think it would behoove the scientific community to do a real search of the Pacific Northwest; months in the forests with concentrated efforts.
"Hallucinations" lol, now who is pushing absurd conclusions
Good objectivism Hephaetus ...when so many cultures throughout the world share a similar story ~ typically myth is rooted in truth
@@scotthull2141 Yes Humans co-existed with other large homind's that's the truth rooted in these myths, Folklore passed down from generation to generation.
The one I saw ruined the outdoors for 20 years. Still paranoid in the woods and wish it never happened. You want to talk about it but friends and family think you are lying or nuts..So you tend to just keep it inside.
Sounds like you have friends and relatives of great character
@@chuckythedoll4815 I understand. However, that don't make Bigfoot real...because he isn't.
@@chuckythedoll4815 Did you see something as well?
@@chuckythedoll4815 Another great review, Cecil. Party Line...I haven't seen that movie, but I'll give it a watch, if only to see Lief Garrett in a wedding dress. Check out Night of the Lepus; it's a '70s monster flick about giant killer bunnies, crazy and daft, but entertaining nonetheless. I'm looking forward to the next Good Bad Flicks video. Keep up the good work, dude.
So this guys saw something that scared him so much he was never the same in the forest again. Pleas explain what could’ve scared him so bad. A bear? Please.
Pretty good vid. Makes me want to visit Willow Creek. The one real negative in this one is Keith Bensen who like your usual "scientist" is full of himself and thinks he knows it all. My answer to his question is that Sasquatch is smarter than he thinks he is ...by far.
Yes! And i dont believe humans are trekking around so much like he says that a sasquatch cant hide!
I dispute that the Patterson fim is the only 1!
Mysterious people show up, & confiscate pictures, or tell their subordinates to destroy them!
No, the marmalade is in the fridge, next to the cheese.
The Paul Freeman footage (to name just one other) is pretty good. There are many others.
For the true believer, no proof is necessary. For the non believer, no proof is enough!
I'm the King Of England ..... You don't need proof as you say.
No proof is enough for none believers, it speaks for itself .
Now, that's a good one 😀👍
Erm, no. If you want bigfoot to get into the book of life then type specimens have to come to light. If you don't care about inconveniences like empiricism and evidence then call it belief, not "proof". I, for one, would love bigfoot to be real, it's an intriguing plausibility, but wanting it to be real does not equate to "proof" or existence. Cheers!
True, but it also has to do with people in this day and age are usually not open minded and are quick to be judgemental. Until they have that interaction and they end up on the other side. One only knows what they're eyes see and ears hear. It's not all roses seeing or being near one and it's not something claimed for attention. At least in my case, I wish I never heard of it at all.
I believe the Patterson film 100% without a shadow of a doubt I live in Australia and in 1990 , I came face to face with a very nasty and territorial, yowie a stupid name I think but that's what they call the creature this is a absolute cousin of big foot our siteings was in the blue mountains national park west of sydney about 3to 4hrs into our hike there it was it was not a encounter I'll ever forget but we walked out of the park alive but I have never gone camping in the bush since and still 31yrs on every day think about the encounter the wicked smell, the fear , and the nitemares good luck getting the evidence we will need but you know I really don't care weather anyone believes me for myself and mate it was a reality and if any of these prominant scientists ever have a face to face encounter they simply wouldn't compute with them cheers from australia God bless
Had a similar experience in the Blue Mountains back in the late 90's. Didn't see it but 'felt it', heard it and smelt it. Will never forget as long as I live.
@@maricvernon6152 mark really happy to see your reply in a strange way I'm relieved someone else has made contact with these buggers unfortunately my mate committed suicide back in 2006 in a unrelated incident ,he would never talk about it with anyone but personally it's a big relief that all these people have had encounters like us I have never forgotten comeing face to face ,the creatures can be very nasty could be a loner maybe but I felt there were more around us as we got out of thier , thanks for your reply cheers phill
Egg & onion. Why do you ask?
Sightings. Nightmare. Whether. Prominent. 😉
@@phillipsmith4501 Coming. Their. 😉
My fave part of this video is the footprint expert at 17:30 whose last name is "Stepp." That's way too cool.
I believe that the Sasquatch is real. It's some of the people that claim to have seen him that I think are fake! The Patterson/ Gimlin Film is 100% real it has proven the test of time. Everything on that film has been scrutinized; the gait, the arm length to body, the stride, hair movement, bulges in the muscle, the sagittal crest head, the turning of the complete head NOT the neck, the circumstance as to how this was filmed and that there was no technology to create such an elaborate costume for a human to fit into it and have the arm length and size the walk in that fashion. The stride is unique. Observe the knees and how they bend as they creature walks and the arm swings!! Further, it has been examined by anthropologists such as Dr. Krantz, Dr. Meldrum, and even skeptics like Dr. Sarmiento. It is compelling and authentic in every way you view it. Science and the government know it is real but there too many issues that will occur if the Scientific community recognize the species. The lumber industry for one would have to decrease its' harvesting of trees if the Sasquatch habitat is declared off limits.
I've noticed that all debunkers , of any subject, find it impossible not to smirk while telling you there's 'no scientific proof'. They seem to be able to ignore accounts , testimony , casts , etc. while pointing to fake 'proof' as proof of lack of proof . I think they have found a lazy way to appear cleverer than they are .
they don't get a lot of sex so this is the closest thing they have to getting off.
@@TrevorToonArt A fully viable theory.
@@TrevorToonArt Sounds like you’re the expert in that area Trevor.
You've described them perfectly.
And have their holy grail explanation with heironimus and Morris. Totally 2 money grubbers.
The DNA investigated by Dr Ketchum also went to 3 laborarories and one at least was the FBI's. They were stunned and asked her if she had found a new animal. There was no talk of "ANOMALIES".
And boy did they go into damage control to smear and obfuscate that study!
Well if that's really the case someone should tell the universities that did the double blind studies. Or we can copy paste vague opinions and pretend like we know anything about the topic
Ad hominem, the last resort of someone whose position is failing.
*Ya he slid the term anomalies in there. They didn't find anomalies. They found DNA they didn't have a reference for*
@@thetruthchannel349 yep.and considering the federal govt is now admitting UFOs are real, maybe somebody should reveal what the govt knows about sasquatch. They know more than they admit. And they have a way of spreading the bogus “it was a bear,”: story anytime there’s a body and a witness.
I SAW PLANET OF THE APES AT ABOUT AGE 5 AND AT THAT AGE I JUST COULDNT GET INTO IT BECAUSE AS GOOD, PROFESSIONAL AND HIGH-TECK (for the time) THE MOVIE JUST COULD NOT DO FOR ME, A FIVE YEAR OLD, WHAT MOVIES ARE SUPPOSED TO DO......ITS CALLED “ SUSPENSION OF DIS-BELIEF” THE POINT BEING TO MAKE YOU FORGET ITS JUST PEOPLE IN MAKEUP AND MONKEY SUITS.......... WHEN I SAW THE PATTERSON GIMLIN FILM, I KNEW 100% THE BIGFOOT WAS REAL, I THINK YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE AN IDIOT IF YOU SPENT JUST A FEW DAYS LOOKING INTO IT AND CONCLUDED THAT THAT FILM, THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CREDIBLE EYE WITNESS REPORTS, THE MILLIONS OF FOOTPRINTS AND TRACKWAYS, ALL THE REAL ACTUAL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF AN UN-ADMITTED TO APEX PREDAOR, ..... IS ALL HAOXES AND MISTAKES THAT IS SO LUDICROUS IT LEAVES ME SPEECHLESS, AND THESE OBVIOUS SHILLS OR DELUSIONAL SKEPTICS SEEM DEMENTED TO ME ....... LETS NOT FORGET, 99.99999999999 OF THE REPORTS AND EVIDENCE CAN BE 100% WRONG, ONLY ONE OF THEM HAS TO BE RIGHT ...... OH THE POOR SHEEPLE
A creature like that attacked the cabin of my great-grand-mother in the 20s...in the depths of Amazon jungle.
She was very old when she told me the whole story in 1994. I could read and feel and see the fear in her eyes...as if it had just happened.
Two months later she died. 😢
She knew that these things exist.
They're covering it up because of the billions involved in the land they occupy, the oil rigs, the mines, the logging, military bases and testing ranges. Even if you find a body, they will swap it out for you; 2 bodies, 1 real black one, 1 fake brown one
ruclips.net/video/juZfnwzqtQw/видео.html
@@laurids2007 that's an amazing account, hadn't heard of them in the Amazon, that's crae crae!
If you wish to be taken seriously then don't conflate the facts by saying that there have been hundreds of thousands of sightings and millions of tracks. Maybe a few thousand sightings and several thousand tracks. Still significant, but lets keep it real.
We’ve got a few in Scotland too,Check out The big grey man of Ben macdouiee,
Man does this dude have a hero complex
Who are you talking about? Are we mind readers?
At 29 minutes the " thoughtful " critic say " Gigantopithicus (fossils) found in Africa " . Dude doesn't even know the teeth were found in China . C'mon man!
There were four sets found all around the world mr professor
@@bluedogsurvive6501 I don't think so but if you have a link, I would be very greatfull. My memory could be failing me. It wouldn't be the first time. I do seem to remember that the teeth are kept in Germany.
I am not a chimpanzee!!!! Lol
@@cats-cool398 That was more garbage. Hominids and pongids are not a direct line. We share ancestors, but the two are divergent. A hominid is not an ape and an ape is not a hominid.
Technically, humans are modified apes.
two words government coverup they make sure you saw a bear as the animal you just hit with your car is wisked away and in canada they take you to border and tell you you are no longer welcome in canada and your insurance only covers bears sasquatch would be an economic disaster
There are many testimonies from fromer gov. workers in US and Canada that say similar.
Whisked. Ps please use punctuation, punctuation is “a courtesy designed to help readers to understand a text/story without stumbling”. (Eats Shoots & Leaves by Lynne Truss).
@@caram2064 no.
@@caram2064 il try harder but im dyslexic its easy for youy
Question for Dr Johnson: food acceptance/habituation to the point of them watching you preform a singing recital and not a single trail cam photo? Gopro strapped to your body? Hair or scat or saliva from the eating area?
Yeah something happened to him along the way...he's gotten pretty "unwell" in the mind
For some reason, tail cameras don't work too take pics of them. It's unknown why, but a lot of people believe that they can see the infrared and avoid the tail cams altogether. I lean towards that as well, but can't say honestly. But there are very few pics from them. I believe there are a couple but not many. There was somebody that used mirrors and trail cams and was reported to have gotten some pics. And I'm not sure exactly how you would get a saliva sample!? Good luck with that, lol!
@@jasonchenoweth5448 Bigfoot doesn't exist...period.
@@conalcochranh3274 how do you explain over 11,000 REPORTED sightings in North America? That's not including the unreported sightings. How can someone in New York, report the same thing as say someone in California? And yes this was before the internet! Think snit that. Even if 1%of the stories are true, then it exists. Explain the P-G film that has survived scrutiny for over 50 years, by scientists, special fx artists and the like? Not one can say that, that footage is a hoax, none. Also, explain away dermal ridges found in for casts, that are pretty much like footprints. They all can't be hoaxes. Impossible. Dr. Jeff Meldrum has over 3,000 casts that he has proven to be real. And he's a for morphologist, that's his primary study! That's pretty much ALL he studies, but your right, he's probably lying he's based his whole career on the study of feet and ancient foot casts for over 20+ years, but what would be know, right!? He's just a noted scientist known worldwide, and the leading expert in that area... but.. I'm sure you could prove him wrong with all of your wisdom.
There's plenty more evidence, but I'll just stop with that. I'm sure you have a logical explain for all of these things, correct?
@@jasonchenoweth5448 Head medicine might help you see things a tad more clearly.
Keith Benson (wildlife biologist) love the condescending tone as he completely fails when talking about Gigantopithecus; China, India yes, Africa no. Doesn't help your argument.
*cringe in Asian*
he is also very condescending when he makes the claim about the forests having been completely explored because we have logger throughout the vast American forests 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
Wonder if he is government paid Wildlife Biologist therefore has to be skeptical if not career in jeopardy.
So i do believe there can be a bigfoot. But am also curious why have never found bones.
Perhaps burying their dead like we do.
@@critters16 No, I prefer egg & onion. Why do you ask?
I think intentional burials would be found before random deaths. Giganto has never had bones other than jaws and teeth found. And it existed in several countries across 6 million years.
9:55 this man's knee look massive, and did you notice how they never show his feet? Coincidence? I think not.
😂
@@tanyanike Egg & onion. Why do you ask?
The advertising with this video
Is so loud it's annoying why
Do they do that it's not going
To make me want the product
i use both google chrome and microsoft edge gotto settings
if you use Edge go to settings
then select extensions there two
Free pre installed ad blockers
just slide button the right to enable
i neve rhave seen a ad on yt since it also blocks most pop ups on other sites.
The Sasquatch is a real species. I know of two people who have seen them personally. Evidence keeps getting covered up and destroyed and denied.
Nailed it. Look up the Xanue Forest people if you want to know the truth about Sasquach
Hundreds of ppl go missing there every year.... you can't find was doesn't want to be found....
you can't find what doesn't want to be found
I love that
kieth benson, have you really bothered to look. wise up.
I am a "knower". I had an encounter in 1980 while in the military. I think they are hard to catch up to and film because they are so much faster than us and very smart. When they hear us come in forest, they can easily elude us by taking off or going underground (caves), where i believe they live. We need to get serious and spend the money to explore caves and get enough people out there to make it happen. not likely though, would cost millions.
Can you tell me briefly if you’re busy what you saw and what your encounter was like?
how convenient.
I hope they never let us find them. If we do, we'll destroy them just like we've destroyed everything else we've ever touched. Humanity is the monster. Please God protect them from us.
There is coming a day when we will need protection from them. They are a biological construct of the Anunaki of Sumerian lore. Read the Epic of Gilgamish with his sidekick Enkidu who is the ancestor of the Sasquatch. They have close ties with UFOs and the paranormal.
They defintely know we are in general, trouble, that's why they typically hide from us. If we don't immediately slow down man's corporate negative effect on our environment we will destroy them and us whether we "find" them or not.
There is nothing to find, so calm down. Bigfoot is a myth and no more than that.
@@jessehampton1872 Um...you do realise that Bigfoot doesn't actually exist...yes?
No, I prefer chicken and ham. Why do you ask?
I had no idea that Jeremy Renner was an expert in Bigfoot and wrote some books on the subject!! 🤯😳
Lol right? It's uncanny...
@@FiveSigma72 No, he put marmalade on his toast, not cheese.
Maybe cut the crazy music when you show someone talking. Was a bit much.
Dr. Johnson is an interesting case, because hes a man whose 6'9" and said the thing he saw dwarfed him.
He could pass for one of Larry Byrd's brothers.
@@diverbob33 He could pass for Larry Byrd himself.
Dr. Johnson has took this subject to far by bringing people in the woods to get healed by these creatures. He has hurt people with his actions. They guy should not have a medical license.
@@donaldfuller5041 Technically. its a psychology license. The healing stuff I didnt know about, but I agree its nonsense..
@James Wimer Idk much about him or his work beyond what I've literally mentioned, that hes an unusually tall person and holds a degree in psychology so Id be ignorant to comment on anything else, but I do know that no one can be manipulated unless they want to be and an idiot with an education is still just an educated idiot. Ppl who have "zero critical thinking skills" have more problems than being lied to. Thats the problem with this subject, hell, almost ANY subject, the gamut runs from the sincere, to the insane, to the con-men, to the naive to the doubters, to the angry and on and on. Personally, if I were that disgusted or bothered, I'd do all I could to stop it and i suppose informing ppl is a method of combating what he does, but he or no one else is manipulating me, or you, by the sound of it, so i have to ask: have you told anyone whom he has manipulated?
Thousands beyond Thousands beyond Thousands have come out and told there encounters.That even the Native’s Have told there True Story’s about them.In Australia they have there Story’s of them beyond what Americans know about them.It is a Big Yes because I have seen them and know so much about them.They are not all a like meaning with that.Some Like of us and there is some who dislike us and for good reason they should.
I suppose they arnt real untill you see one.
You suppose right.
@@NattyBumppo48 Wow, that must suck to not believe in all those animals you haven't seen. Just imagine how great your world would be if you believed in all those deep water fishes and creatures that are "found" every day. The "Billy Ape", and the new relative of the Giraffe found in the forests of Vietnam. Weird how all those soldiers out there in the war didn't see them. Ah hell they must not be there right. Just think of all those Wooly Mammoths, Giant Elk, Giant Buffalo, Sabre tooth Tigers, Cave Bears, Dinosaurs and the such your missing out. Oh well, I think I'll go to the Zoo tommorow and see a Gorilla that people like you said were imaginary up until the early 1900s. Maybe they will have a six foot long chelacamph that was extinct for 6 million years. That will be fun for the grandkids I suppose.
@@mattmoilanen3813 So unicorns and flying monkees must be real to..... Look, just because a chunk of society "wants" something to be real doesn't make it so. Pretty much everyone has a cell phone w/camera these days so.... take a credible photo and show me. Surely out of the thousands of people walking around with cell phones, someone could get a reasonably solid pic. And by "reasonably solid" I mean something a normal person with no recurring big foot dreams could look at and say "yep, that's a BF". Until then, I suppose guys like me will argue with guys like you. Thus the BF controversy perpetuates itself.....
I walk thru forests alone looking at broken branches and items that these Bigfoot people would claim was done by a Bigfoot. It's just the natural landscape.
You'll never see one...because they're not real.
😂😂😂There are no Bigfoots,😂😂😂only in you vivid minds
I used to be a firm believer that they were out there, and there were many of them. As the years have passed, I see the same old shows, same old footage, same old print casts. I just cannot believe with virtually everyone on earth having an HD camera in their pocket at all times, we cannot get any new clear, credible footage. The woods in the fall are filled with HD game cameras that snap on motion, yet you rarely see any bigfoot shots on them either, and if you do, it is blurry "arm" or "leg", where pictures of squirrels and raccoons are crystal clear. I really hope they are real, I just feel at this point, I would almost have to see one myself before I truly believed.
I agree with you! However, there is also the idea that Bigfoot is a transdimensional being. And being elusive is his nature.
That's exactly how I see this whole theory of Big Foot 👣
@@laura-kn9qf Not necessarily. I have been an avid outdoorsman my entire life. Spent tons of time in the woods and on the waters. I have seen a grand total of TWO black bears during my life. Just because something is real does not mean it is common. I see bald eagles once or twice per year too, and I know they are real.
@@laura-kn9qf Right. I am not saying they are real, or even probable. My first comment said exactly that. I was only taking issue with your point that if they are real, they would be spotted all over and be common. I know bears are real etc, but I do not see them like squirrels or deer. Now figure on a high order primate who has a natural tendency to avoid man and how often would those be spotted? I have always said if 99% of the pictures and accounts are fake, there is still that 1% that are not. I am not betting my house they exist for certain, but I haven't totally dismissed the possibility, at least for now.
I'd bet my house the pg film is real.
Maybe you cant find them because your not looking in the right places. They migrate, and the government would never let evidence be known to the public. It would cause so many problems. So even if he did find something he couldn't talk about it.
Even if Only One encounter is true...
Yes, Tom and when the One is found again…is my client. I’ll represent him/her/it in civil court suing for all Bigfoot revenue in memorabilia, movies, documentaries for the past 50 years. It will be more famouser than ever, living in a giant mansion (‘scuse the pun) in town in Willow Creek, where alcohol and pot is more accessible. And just maybe finally lead a normal life.
I believe the Patterson-Gimlin film is real. You can see Patty's muscles underneath her shiny fur as she walks away. I don't think that if someone made a costume they would make one with breasts. A retired Hollywood costume maker said they would not have the technology in 1967 to make a costume that looked like Patty. Just check out the movie "Planet of the Apes" costumes. There is no comparison.
No, I prefer hotdogs, cheeseburgers, pizza and French fries. Why do you ask?
ooh I like that you gave her a name/srs
@@NoelGruberButBetter I didn’t give her the name Patty. She was nicknamed Patty decades ago.😊
the video starts off good, and then the critics show up with no proof that people are lying. When you accuse people are lying, the burden of proof is on you
Well that never crossed my mind good thinking
Heironimus and Morris definitely lied.
It’s not a monster, I’m Native American and these “people” need to be respected
I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy. Get out of here.
- Mitch Hedberg
ROFL best comment thus far man :)
Bigfoot alive? Mitch, not so much.
Streufert went all "Gollam and The Precious" with that giant scanned image off the real of Gymlins Girl
..why isn't there a Sasquatch emoji in my phone, dag it? ... it's a real thing
The movie Willow Creek got scary real damn fast.
omg yes Agreed
Gigantopethicus was found in Asia... what qualifications does he have
That skull is a product of Grover Krantz's bad science too. It appears he never read the Hoax at Piltdown or chose to forgot it.
I think it's a Neanderthal..
I don't mind listening to the stories that people experience.
I don't like those who have not experienced it, calling people who do, liars! 😡
That's like me saying, "DID YOU KNOW AUSTRALIA DOESN'T EXIST?!? I've never seen it! & No matter how many genuine pictures you show me, THAT PROVES NOTHING! I've never seen it, THEREFORE, IT DOESN'T EXIST!"
Or, "I can't say anything, because these ppl in government who are trained to lie, & would pass a polygraph test like a cake walk, have threatened me."
Skeptics will see proof someday, either in this life or the next!!
great take a photo
Just a point.. I would think that those with sceptical minds who demand scientific evidence probably don't believe in the after life or reincarnation either. Like I said..just a point. 😀
@@johnbravo7542 I'd like my photo on a mug please.
@@gwmitchell1980 Thats right. You are correct. It's called being intelligent. How can reincarnation exist for instance if there are more people on the planet today than there was yesterday?
They might see it, but will they believe it?
All the sightings and evidence ..yes some are fake but there's something out there for sure 👍
That's great talk about a bigfoot while your kid is on your lap @10:50 now he can't sleeps at night
He was there. It's better to talk openly.
Bigfoot has never seen “you” either does that mean you don’t exist
It depends upon which day of the week it is and what I was up to the night before . . . Cheers!
I do exist. Bigfoot, however, does not.
conal cochranh3 , you say you exist but is belief in your existence because of peoples visual proof, they have seen you, some have had physical contact with you. So has everyone else in the world visually confirmed your existence? Or do they believe you exist due to small evidences , pictures, eyewitnesses 🤔 all of which can easily be tampered with and obviously eyewitness can’t be trusted...that’s fine that you don’t believe in the existence of things unseen but just because you haven’t experienced or visually confirmed the mysteries of this vast planet does not mean the monsters of this place need your belief to exist. P.s I hope you continue happily in your confined comfortable cozy matrix world, 👹👽👾😈🤖👀
Rob Fitzsimmons you don’t have to say if it makes you uncomfortable but where were you when you had your experience
Just cuz ya Haven't seen Bigfoot
Doesn't mean Bigfoot hasn't seen you.
I see what you mean my Friend. 🤠🖖
I was walking my golden retriever along a path in the woods once and I saw him staring at me. I could only see him from his waist up. I said "It's nice weather we're having" and he grunted at me. At first I assumed he was just an extremely unattractive man with no shirt on. I then looked down at my golden retriever and she looked liked she had melted into the ground with her two scared brown eyes staring up at me. As I glanced down, I could near his foot steps running away. After that, I suddenly felt really unnerved and we left as fast as we could. That was it.
I find the Patterson Bigfoot film fascinating. Forget about scientists and biologists. The special effects masters from the films “Planet of the Apes” and “Congo” have all stated that even today, they could not re-create a costume of that size, muscular detail and movements, capable of allowing a man to stride across 200 yards of broken terrain. The gentleman from “Congo” went as far as to say, I don’t know what kind of creature that is - but it most definitely is not a man in a suit.
Id also like to go to where the Paterson film was shot! It looks like beautiful country!
I live in the south surrounded by forest & I've Personally heard it All & the one chance I had to actually See Him up on a ridge top deep in the woods looking down at me But I was afraid to make eye contact. So me & five dogs with the hair standing up started slowly walking Backwards & the turned & ran like hell with the dogs because I didn't want to be left behind & gobbled up.
@@Secret4u2hear It could've been someone in a monkey suit...just like the PGF.
No, the fridge was moved to the opposite wall. No idea what happened to the marmalade though.
You do not know where that was shot?
I hope this works...
It goes work. If you put in a starting point, and then hit "directions", a red flag will pop up on the map, CBS you can zoom in, or simply follow the directions.!
Patterson-Gimlin Film Location
maps.app.goo.gl/YD9dfPRUnFi2zzzR7
Is it just me or does Bob Smallsback look like "Harry" from "Harry and the Henderson's"?
It makes me curious about if there were any UFO sightings in and around the same area. People from Pennsylvania back in 1974 I believe it was when UFO sightings were definitely connected to sasquatch like creatures according to the eyewitness testimony which includes police officers a property owner who had called the police when he had an encounter with something out of a sci fi nightmare??? I actually believe that there is something to that claim and could explain why you don't find any bodies also could explain the people who have claimed to see Bigfoot in the exact same location at and during the same time frame ? I bet if they took this serious they would learn about more than tall whites lol.
Swamp Gas.
The reason these Shiver shows are so good is because they show both sides of the issue and explore probable explanations.
Danny Krinkle
You have to be joking. Read my comments above.
The old professor
@@clanrobertson7200 nah
Robert Morse is marginalizing Ketchums work, shes far more capable than he is and not likely to make stupid comments and mistakes in regards the DNA from the samples sent to her, over 200 samples if memory serves! The people who helped are all above reproach and are very credible, and the wording of her finding was "half human female with unidentifiable Male DNA", not quite what Morse said it was!
Some may be hoaxes. What I encountered was no hoax, it was a nightmare.A bad one.
What happened? Do u mind sharing?
@@n8dawg428 I believe it. Most witnesses are actually scared to death, and it's life changing for them.
Try Bigfoot eyewitness radio, Vic Cundiff is great at helping witnesses come to terms with an encounter.
I would also point out there is even worse out there, namely Dogman
Im not trying to bee over critical but its the other way around; some are definitely hoaxes, not some "may":be hoaxes. I have never had an encounter myself but I still believe! I also believe you and I would like to hear no about your encounter if you don't mind sharing?
Undiscovered primates is definitely possible. Gorillas weren't even discovered till 1902. But a dogman...I do not believe in. Maybe just maybe what people are seeing is a demon??
29:21 Africa? Wait.... gigantopithecus was not found in Africa but south east asia.... and they only found teeth... moulders if I got it correct in my memories. Maybe they found more fragments but it was in today China....
29.20 Gigantopithecus remains have not been found in Africa, they have been found in China, Vietnam and Indonesia but as yet not in Africa.
Oh, ok...you're only credible if you have a degree of some kind...whatever...I know what I've seen and heard. No degree necessary in my book.
I think bigfoot is the one telling the Dr. Johnson story lol
Lmao!!!
Agreed this is not the best documentary ever on the subject .
It's only a matter of time before some more substantial evidence is produced. These are extremely intelligent creatures. If anyone wants to see some Yowie (Australian Bigfoot) evidence-tree breaks/structures, check out my camping videos👣.
Steven Streufert looks like a knock off Matt Moneymaker
strung out Matt Moneymaker LoL
Yuuuuuup
If you buy Matt Moneymaker off Wish
Matthew Johnson has slowly discredited himself because he talks as if he’s two people and he was so rude to so many before his book came out because he wanted everybody to come to him and believe in him saying that thousands came through a portal is ludicrous he’s delusional and he is a pompous.
"and theyre like, and i go, and theyre like"
this is a doctor?
@Adam Lolno aye, it is. nothing wrong with speaking a dialect, or even a sociolect, but "valleygirl" is neither.
He's a psychologist so it's kind of like calling a chiropractor Dr.
Exactly! what kind of wankery do these idiots speak? It's getting worse!
Yes, a Dr of like apparently
PERHAPS COLOR CAMERAS DON'T AND DOESN'T PIC UP UNDERSTAND???????!!!!!!!!
Maybe they bury their dead.
And live deep in the caves
That's what I've always thought. Some indigenous Americans describe them as cannibals but people always assume it means they eat us. Incidentally these are often the same people that insist it's just an unknown species of great ape
In the forest? Where millions of tree roots would eventually push up bones? Are you really that stupid?
They do bury their dead, they're like giant scared Indians, they're terrified of us and for good reason, but they know our limits and use them to their advantage. They're also very curious about us, and hence are most often seen peeking in windows. Main thing to know if you bump into one is usually they will reflect your behaviour, but if you entered their territory, and they dont want you around, best to leave, stone throwing is them politely showing you the door
@@uncannyvalley2350 ''They'' ..... You seem to know an awful lot about a fictional character.
I'll say it again ... If you bury ANYTHING in the woods, it is only a matter of time before a) predators dig it up to eat, and b) growing tree roots effectively push up the bones. You are speaking rubbish and spouting it as if you are some kind of professor on the subject hahahaha.
They do have a lot more pictures of them than just PG, That is a lie. Great north film. Red woods, there are many.
I believe these entities are dimentional or spiritual beings..
Undoubtedly they are real...they are a global/cultural phenomenon... witnessed throughout
History by many different types of people...
Real or hoax I love this stuff 👏🙌❤️🙏🏽👍
Or known to millions as michelle obama
Probably time to move on homie.... They been outta the WH for 3 years.
@Green Bean Sex Machine - Big foots location makes him no less a bigfoot...
Translavania Melania and Ivana
...and IVANKA
Seems all first ladies of the 20th century wore the pants 👍
The spooky soundtrack and extrapolations tell me one thing: Bigfoot is Big Bucks.
Yep, there's money to be made in nonsense.
WOW THAT GUY LOOKS LIKE A CRACKED OUT HAWKEYE HAHAHAHAHA
Yep that's Hawkeye alright
Every person who was in this video presented themselves and thier point of view very well especially the lovely lady in the museum and yes my darling including the yowie I always believed the yowie was a wives tail untile I came face to face with one very agressive individual in the blue mountains national park west of sydney here in Australia I litterally walked into this big fella,s territory with my mate in 1990 as agressive as these creatures can be they need our help yes investigate them but please don't Willy nilly hunt them they egsist cheers to all our brothers and sisters in the u.s.a. love from Australia
No, I prefer pizza, hotdogs, cheeseburgers & French fries. Why do you ask?
Is the background music supposed to make the experts look and sound crazy? 😄🙈
Thats exactly what the media giants are doing, they also pick "experts" that look a bit wierd or if you google them discrediting info comes up
@@Ktown471 I know what You mean.. 🖤
@@einienj3281 I once picked a weeble berry from Martha Scrubble's backyard and...and now I...uh...
@@Ktown471 I once met a woman from Malitica...but she wasn't operating on all eight cylinders. Sound familiar?
No, I prefer marmalade. Why do you ask?
Who you calling an animal? I didnt do it =)
No, I prefer egg & onion, also chicken & ham. Why do you ask?
The Patterson Gimlin Film has been proven not to be a man in a suit by Bill Munn's (a respected costume and makeup designer). He breaksnit down with Science and his experience you can read his book, When Patty Met Roger or listen to him on William Jevning's podcast Creek Devil episodes 34 - 35
Very true. The book's title by the way is When Roger Met Patty.
Yep. I have it, and several Sasquatch books in my classroom library.
@@davidcopson5800
Munns even solved the lens problem. Makes patty even larger than she seems.
The background music did not fit the feel of the situation.
It drowned out the voices. Could have done without it.
A lot of loggers was paid big money 💰 to keep there mouths shut to stop the logging being stopped to protect bf
I thought is wise that this show didn't tell how Dr Johnson also believes these creatures have the ability to mindspeak telepathically and jump through portals and can become invisible at will. Dr Johnson is a quack who needs to talk a psychiatrist himself! ROFL!
william smith Lol mate exactly my thought. I saw an interview with him once and the whole encounter sounded legit with tears and everything but then he went on about portals and powers and I was like oh hell no. 😂
The woo factor just ruins it for me. How about a specimen before going off on all these wild tangents. The only extra dimensional creature that can pop up suddenly and scare you is my ex...
Most Psychiatrists needs to see a Psychiatrist themselves !
Streufert looks sick somebody take homie to see the doc!! 😂
LoL...strung out on that scanned image of Gimlin's girl like Gollum and The Precious
My only question is why has no one ever found the remains of one? A carcass? A skeleton?
Supposedly, they bury their dead. Much more difficult to find than a carcass on the ground.
Great question though! Great analytical thinking.
An exposed carcass would be predated on and scattered about by other animals. Otherwise the woods would be littered by various animal bones.
Good observation, however Dr. Meldrum and Dr. Sarmiento both observe that Bear carcasses are not found that readily either. Nature will dissolve the bones, hair and skin. If the Sasquatch is a hominid then they could bury their dead as well. Remember the Gorilla was a myth until the early 1800's.
How do you know they haven't. Would they tell you if they did?
Ever find a bear dead in the woods? Nope but there there
17:09......."His footprint casting made a big impression on everybody" 😋
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan
Tony Caine All we need is some actual evidence.
And, with all the witness accounts, it most certainly is NOT an extraordinary claim. It's become much more common. So all we need is more evidence.
>what is the scientific method.
Thats a really dumb quote, and thats why nobody will remember sagan for his work on the scientific field, but as the prefered ad verecundiam of edgy teens.
Cop out statement....
Yes, so we keep hearing.
A Yowie is quite different to a bigfoot. Yowies and Bunyips have NEVER been described as ape like. They are more closely related to a Quinkin and are dark spirits more than they are an ape man.
Yowies are almost identical to bigfoot. Even similar calls. A great thermal image shows 2 at once.
Oh I'm the king of the swingers man
The jungle VIP
I reached the top
and had to stop
And that what's been bothering me
I want to be a man mancub
And stroll right into town
And be just like the other men
I'm tired of monkeying around!
No, I prefer marmalade. Why do you ask?
Ol peggy is a SNL skit waiting to happen ......🤣🤣
Have seen a few yowies they don't walk like a human being
I always feel like as I am watching videos with a guy talking Bigfoot that 2 guys in white suits will soon walk in and say ok visiting hours are up. Time to take your meds.
Well, Sir, the reason why you can find small, extremely rare animals and not Sasquatch is that the latter is too intelligent for camera traps, and is a consummate camouflage hider. Sorry about that syntax. Anyway, I’ve seen all kinds of animals notice camera traps on game trails within seconds, even though the cameras have no lights and emit very little sound. But then, if the individual cameras only hummed a bit, the animals would likely hear them, bc their hearing is much better than ours. Then, I’ve seen video footage of an animal taller than 6 feet who breathed a little hard, and was smart enough to stand off to one side as it disabled a camera, so you can’t see what it is, but it had very large, dexterous fingers. I don’t think your tiny rare animals could do that, just sayin.’
Big foot does exist.
Great comment. Thanks for coming.
@ 2 bodies, 1 real, 1 a brown suit: ruclips.net/video/juZfnwzqtQw/видео.html
Ancient temples say we evolved unnaturally not from Bigfoot
They are not apes per se, they are a type of person. Hence the elusiveness.
My favorite Bigfoot stories go like this: "I know what I saw, and it wasn't a bear." I think most people who have spent any time in the woods know the difference between an upright walking bear and a large bipedal hairy creature.
Unfortunately, the evidence to date has not conclusively supported their stories.
Fear and darkness does odd things to a man/woman. Lack of sleep is probably also to blame.
@plaguelock People identify things wrongly at normal times of day, whilst staring at whatever the thing is. In situations such as these, people tend to see whatever it is for a split second in low light whilst running away fearing for their life. It's only normal that most of these sightings would be misidentified bears or other animals. Even hunters or woodsmen can misidentify things.
To say all the sightings are correct and true is ridiculous.
Lol, most of the witnesses are hunters
#FAIL
@@dylvasey except witnesses describe clear as day encounters from a few feet away. Another FAIL
@@uncannyvalley2350 You're saying this as if hunters have never killed a human by mistake. Hunters often go for days without sleep accounting for many MANY errors.
I can back what I'm saying up by factual evidence. Can you? hahahahaha. Idiot.
Patterson was running with the camera to try and keep up with the creature, who was walking very nonchalantly. He couldn’t do it. Man in a suit???? Doubt it!