For more on this topic "Is the Uttarakand of the Valmiki Ramayan a Later Addition?" please do watch this 1-hour discussion ruclips.net/video/5zfQQtxbFKw/видео.html 🙏🙏
"Your storytelling and ability to keep the facts together is the only way to unite society, which is being divided by added propaganda in our sacred scriptures. Great work, brother!" 💯
Thank you for your wonderful narration of the valmiki ramayan, living in Guyana , South America but being of Indian heritage these well narrated vides help us to keep our sanatani culture alive
Please don’t stop and be consistent. You guys have great potential. Get a bigger team and do some PR for channel growth. But please be consistent in releasing episodes!
Completed whole Ramayan Thank you for this lovely podcast I will remember this throughout my life ❣️❣️ You covering uttar khand although you thought its not the part of original is commendable! Please do similar commentary for the Mahabharata too if possible
I was almost shocked when I heard of uttarkand in the last episode, I always believed that it was not a part of the original text, this episode brings peace to my mind.
Opinion: It is very hard for people to accept a perfect human being who can go to any lengths to do what is right. So, uttarkand is added to make him more humanly. There might be situation arrived that forced a king or a ruler to change the Ramayana or add some faults In his character. This might be due to the well read people who are looking for a King like Shree Ram. Though it is a hypothetical situation but we have seen the similar things happened with our last 500 years. The history we read and what happened actually are different. Considering this angle, Uttarkand came to lower the shine of Shree Rama's character.
Pranam mahodye! I agree to your perspective, infact the point about king that you added, I feel similar, like this might have been added to make king of a certain time, to realise the value of people. I myself do not believe shree ram did this and honestly felt happy seeing someone putting it like this. Jai shree Ram
I have an opinion. Maybe Uttarkand is not an interpolation in its entirety but only parts of it. Valmiki ji does says that he wrote the epic in six kandas with one epilogue.
what u are saying might be right. But for one second, if we sit down and try to think why would sita be asked to leave despite she proving herself in agni pariksha goes on to be a big question. To be honest, Uttarakhand seems like a sequel made after the success of the prequels. Especially if you see both in the story as well as moral perspective. Both end being bad.
There is a book named ' Ram Dwara Sita Ka Nirvasan Aur Shambok Vadh' by Rajni Raman Jha proves that Uttarakhand isn't part of Ramayana and is added later so neither Shambhuk vadh nor Agnipariksha happened
Uttarkaand was not written by Maharshi Valmiki. Even in Baalkand also the entire 15th Sarga and some shlokas in 16th Sarga seem to be later additions. In first Sarga neither Devarshi Narada nor Valmiki said that SriRama was incarnation of Bhagwan Vishnu.
A very very well made video. 👏🏻👏🏻 And the “facts” tabled “as such” without using own assumptions of “poetic imagery” etc. THIS video needed the very apt logical analysis done by the narrator. My anger in earlier videos is because of the painting, anything beyond human, as “poetic imagery,” which rendered this pretty good effort as good as the other versions. Of Ramayana. It’s a loss. So it’s like this channel intended to table facts BUT could not resist making it like just one of them, with “own” narrative interjected. Such interjections & interpretations and calling them "poetic" & "imagery" not only insult an author, here its someone as towering as Rishi Valmiki, BUT is also called distortion of facts. its not some Shakespeare novel, its "gyan" which can only be fully assimilated by exceptional ones only. During Vedic times, they were very clear on the eligibility of the receiver of gyan. Thats why they would be reluctant in passing it to anyone by writing and maintained the "Shruti" mode. With so many "misinterpreted" versions of our epics, we now know that purist exceptional rendering continues to elude us so many thousands years later too! Having said that, nice effort but i wont refer it to kids. It needs mature audience who can dismiss and challenge the misinterpretations in it. The narrator seems so capable and thats why its si disappointing. I find this episode excellent! 👍🏻
Actually the main intention behind shambook Tapasya was to enter heaven with body (without dying) which was unnatural and the same intention was of king trishanku also who was Rama's ancestor
🙏🙏 At the moment, we are only focused on completing the Ramayan series. We are still working on the last three seasons in Hindi. No plans to work on Mahabharat as of now.
I have one question..in the Baalkand it is mentioned that Valmiki was looking for someone who could sing the Ramayan for him after he had finished the writing. Then he finds Luv -Kush and hear them singing the same song on the roads of Ayodhya. And the also afterwards it is mentioned that they are singing in Ram's Durbar without either of them knowing that they are son and father. How do you explain that.
We have dealt with your question as well in this 1-hour video on "Is the Uttarakand of the Valmiki Ramayan a Later Addition?" ruclips.net/video/5zfQQtxbFKw/видео.html 🙏🙏
The king Arjun who defeated Ravan was none other than Kartavirya Arjuna of Haihaya dynasty who was killed by sage Parshuram as a punishment for stealing the cow Kamdhenu
2:45 That is true but isn't it possible that when he realised that Vali is too much for him he decided to made peace for both his safety and political reasons.
Then he would have done the same with Ram in his final battle. His whole hard earned Kingdom was at danger because of the war with Ram but still he chose fighting over peace.
@Shibangi_spirituality That is true. But again his fight with Ram and his fight with Vali had different reasons. He fought Vali to know who is the strongest while he fought Ram because he wanted Sita. Plus, during the war his lust and arrogance banished all commonsense from his mind.
Uttar kand me sita ma ka vanvas fake story hai to use mat dikhana. Sita ji ne apna jeevan ayodhya me bitaya tha. Yeh vanvas ki sorry fake hai. Don't show that.
He was named Arjun by birth. Because his father's name was Kritaveer he was called Kartavirya and he was called sahstrabahu because he was blessed with a strength of thousand arms by bhagwan Dattatreya.
Your sense of entitlement is wild.. you do realize Mr Deodhar and his team have done this without monetizing these stories? You’re getting this content for free. Please show some gratitude and acknowledge their efforts. And if you’ve learned anything at all from the Ramayana, show some patience and support him with more positivity so that we may one day hopefully hear his narration on the Mahabharata
For more on this topic "Is the Uttarakand of the Valmiki Ramayan a Later Addition?" please do watch this 1-hour discussion
ruclips.net/video/5zfQQtxbFKw/видео.html
🙏🙏
Plz bring the Mahabharata in same manner ❤
He read ramayan for 6 years
He is not a scholar of Mahabharat so it would be so difficult for him to do this
@@haddisingh6951 to unko 6 varsh mahabharat bhi parhni chahiye. Phir laaye. Hum kahi jaane wale to nhi hai. 😄
Sir please 🥺 bring our great Mahabharat too
"Your storytelling and ability to keep the facts together is the only way to unite society, which is being divided by added propaganda in our sacred scriptures. Great work, brother!" 💯
🙏🙏
This Channel, these Digital Animations are as Holy As The Script of Ramayan. Surely its the Ramayan "For" 21st Century People
🙏🏼🙏🏼
Thank you for your wonderful narration of the valmiki ramayan, living in Guyana , South America but being of Indian heritage these well narrated vides help us to keep our sanatani culture alive
Jai Shree Ram sir 🙏🏻
Best series ever
🙏🏼🙏🏼
Jai Shri Ram 🎉thank you so much
You are the real "Tapasvi"
Jai Shri Ram 🙏
Please don’t stop and be consistent. You guys have great potential. Get a bigger team and do some PR for channel growth. But please be consistent in releasing episodes!
Completed whole Ramayan Thank you for this lovely podcast I will remember this throughout my life ❣️❣️
You covering uttar khand although you thought its not the part of original is commendable!
Please do similar commentary for the Mahabharata too if possible
🙏🙏
I was almost shocked when I heard of uttarkand in the last episode, I always believed that it was not a part of the original text, this episode brings peace to my mind.
🙏🏼🙏🏼
Vote for Mahabharat 🤞
Please bring the same series in Hindi.. You will connect much better with the audience.
हिंदी में भाग ५ हम कुछ ही दनों में रिलीज़ करेंगे।
भाग ६ और ७ पर भी काम चल राजा है।
🙏🙏
Opinion: It is very hard for people to accept a perfect human being who can go to any lengths to do what is right. So, uttarkand is added to make him more humanly. There might be situation arrived that forced a king or a ruler to change the Ramayana or add some faults In his character. This might be due to the well read people who are looking for a King like Shree Ram.
Though it is a hypothetical situation but we have seen the similar things happened with our last 500 years. The history we read and what happened actually are different. Considering this angle, Uttarkand came to lower the shine of Shree Rama's character.
incredible perspective
Pranam mahodye!
I agree to your perspective, infact the point about king that you added, I feel similar, like this might have been added to make king of a certain time, to realise the value of people.
I myself do not believe shree ram did this and honestly felt happy seeing someone putting it like this.
Jai shree Ram
I have an opinion. Maybe Uttarkand is not an interpolation in its entirety but only parts of it. Valmiki ji does says that he wrote the epic in six kandas with one epilogue.
what u are saying might be right. But for one second, if we sit down and try to think why would sita be asked to leave despite she proving herself in agni pariksha goes on to be a big question.
To be honest, Uttarakhand seems like a sequel made after the success of the prequels. Especially if you see both in the story as well as moral perspective. Both end being bad.
@@agniswar3 it is believed by some, that the last shlokas of yudhkand were the original uttarkaand.
There is a book named '
Ram Dwara Sita Ka Nirvasan Aur Shambok Vadh' by
Rajni Raman Jha proves that Uttarakhand isn't part of Ramayana and is added later so neither Shambhuk vadh nor Agnipariksha happened
The most controversial kand 🤣
Thank you so much for this amazing series
Uttarkaand was not written by Maharshi Valmiki.
Even in Baalkand also the entire 15th Sarga and some shlokas in 16th Sarga seem to be later additions. In first Sarga neither Devarshi Narada nor Valmiki said that SriRama was incarnation of Bhagwan Vishnu.
उत्तर कांड वाल्मीकि रामायण का भाग नही है
Siyavar Ramchandra ki Jay
🎉waah
A fan .. Wish it blows away with many views
🙏🏼🙏🏼
It was added by Brahmin in ancient times because many of the other old text also talks about utarkand
A very very well made video. 👏🏻👏🏻 And the “facts” tabled “as such” without using own assumptions of “poetic imagery” etc. THIS video needed the very apt logical analysis done by the narrator. My anger in earlier videos is because of the painting, anything beyond human, as “poetic imagery,” which rendered this pretty good effort as good as the other versions. Of Ramayana. It’s a loss. So it’s like this channel intended to table facts BUT could not resist making it like just one of them, with “own” narrative interjected. Such interjections & interpretations and calling them "poetic" & "imagery" not only insult an author, here its someone as towering as Rishi Valmiki, BUT is also called distortion of facts. its not some Shakespeare novel, its "gyan" which can only be fully assimilated by exceptional ones only. During Vedic times, they were very clear on the eligibility of the receiver of gyan. Thats why they would be reluctant in passing it to anyone by writing and maintained the "Shruti" mode. With so many "misinterpreted" versions of our epics, we now know that purist exceptional rendering continues to elude us so many thousands years later too! Having said that, nice effort but i wont refer it to kids. It needs mature audience who can dismiss and challenge the misinterpretations in it. The narrator seems so capable and thats why its si disappointing. I find this episode excellent! 👍🏻
🙏🙏
Eagerly waited
Hindi version is still pending.
please upload hindi episodes as well♥♥
हिंदी में भाग ५ हम कुछ ही दनों में रिलीज़ करेंगे।
भाग ६ और ७ पर भी काम चल राजा है।
🙏🙏
हिन्दी एपिसोड कब आएगा?
Actually the main intention behind shambook Tapasya was to enter heaven with body (without dying) which was unnatural and the same intention was of king trishanku also who was Rama's ancestor
Sir you are best
We appreciate your efforts 🙏
As being your subscribers we demand Mahabharat in the same manner.Please reply if you are thinking about this or not
🙏🙏
At the moment, we are only focused on completing the Ramayan series. We are still working on the last three seasons in Hindi.
No plans to work on Mahabharat as of now.
Pls bring out hindi videos Season 5 onwards...
हिंदी में भाग ५ हम कुछ ही दनों में रिलीज़ करेंगे।
भाग ६ और ७ पर भी काम चल राजा है।
🙏🙏
❤
I have one question..in the Baalkand it is mentioned that Valmiki was looking for someone who could sing the Ramayan for him after he had finished the writing. Then he finds Luv -Kush and hear them singing the same song on the roads of Ayodhya. And the also afterwards it is mentioned that they are singing in Ram's Durbar without either of them knowing that they are son and father. How do you explain that.
We have dealt with your question as well in this 1-hour video on "Is the Uttarakand of the Valmiki Ramayan a Later Addition?"
ruclips.net/video/5zfQQtxbFKw/видео.html
🙏🙏
Good work sir🎉🎉❤❤🎉🎉
🙏🏼🙏🏼
The king Arjun who defeated Ravan was none other than Kartavirya Arjuna of Haihaya dynasty who was killed by sage Parshuram as a punishment for stealing the cow Kamdhenu
traditionalists say uttarkhand is part of ramayana
Include insights on Lakshman parityag too before end by Mahaprasthan of ShriRam with all happened....
is the story of hanuman cutting open his chest to show sita-ram in it in the uttarakand? or is it not in the valmiki ramayan (even the uttarakand)?
This story is not in the Uttarakand. 🙏🙏
Uttar kand Valmiki Ji ki Mul Rachna hai lekin jis prakar se aaj ki pustakon mein hai us prakar se nahin ❤
Tho kaise hai
2:45 That is true but isn't it possible that when he realised that Vali is too much for him he decided to made peace for both his safety and political reasons.
Then he would have done the same with Ram in his final battle. His whole hard earned Kingdom was at danger because of the war with Ram but still he chose fighting over peace.
@Shibangi_spirituality That is true. But again his fight with Ram and his fight with Vali had different reasons. He fought Vali to know who is the strongest while he fought Ram because he wanted Sita. Plus, during the war his lust and arrogance banished all commonsense from his mind.
Thank you sir 🙏🏼🪷
🙏🏼🙏🏼
Plz describe uttarkhand like the previous kandas🙏🙏
Make on mahabharat also
1 January 2025 release date of season 5 in hindi
Uttar kand me sita ma ka vanvas fake story hai to use mat dikhana. Sita ji ne apna jeevan ayodhya me bitaya tha. Yeh vanvas ki sorry fake hai. Don't show that.
Sir S5 hindi me dalo
हिंदी में भाग ५ हम कुछ ही दनों में रिलीज़ करेंगे।
भाग ६ और ७ पर भी काम चल राजा है।
🙏🙏
Arjun or Sahasrarjun
Sahastrarjun
He was named Arjun by birth.
Because his father's name was Kritaveer he was called Kartavirya and he was called sahstrabahu because he was blessed with a strength of thousand arms by bhagwan Dattatreya.
Please Hindi
हिंदी में भाग ५ हम कुछ ही दनों में रिलीज़ करेंगे।
भाग ६ और ७ पर भी काम चल राजा है।
🙏🙏
Hindi me banao bhai sirf english mein mt batao😢
हिंदी में भाग ५ हम कुछ ही दनों में रिलीज़ करेंगे।
भाग ६ और ७ पर भी काम चल राजा है।
🙏🙏
Please mahabharat also or I will unsubscribe you
Your sense of entitlement is wild.. you do realize Mr Deodhar and his team have done this without monetizing these stories? You’re getting this content for free. Please show some gratitude and acknowledge their efforts. And if you’ve learned anything at all from the Ramayana, show some patience and support him with more positivity so that we may one day hopefully hear his narration on the Mahabharata
Uttarakhand doesnt exist in valmiki ramayana. Please don't preach wrong things to people. Valmiki ramayana ends with yuddhakand
Have you watched this all the way to the end? He has literally stated how the Uttarakand could not have been written by Valmiki
Bro just saw the title and commented
Sambuk tapasya Ram killed no no Uttarkand ramayana Fack
that means love kush birth also fack?
@@librarylibrary-pj5zimay be yes, since actual Valmiki's Ramayan ends in yuddhakand
@@librarylibrary-pj5ziWhen Ramayana ended with Shri Ram Coronation then how the later story is real.
Pranam mahodye@@librarylibrary-pj5zi
Shree Ram's son's birth isn't fake, because the reference can be seen in yudhkand as well.
Jai shree Ram
Uttar kand is fully part of ramayan, no matter how much you try. We will always follow varna based on birth