@@SansOrganesLet’s look where our relationship with infrared started from. Where does Haz come from? The Russian state started to exist as a centralized state in 862. This is considered to be the year of creation of the Russian state because this year the townspeople of Novgorod (a city in the North-West of the country) invited Rurik, a Varangian prince from Scandinavia, to reign. In 1862, Russia celebrated the 1000th anniversary of its statehood, and in Novgorod there is a memorial dedicated to the 1000th anniversary of the country. In 882, Rurik's successor Prince Oleg, who was, actually, playing the role of regent for Rurik’s young son because Rurik had died by that time, came to Kiev. He ousted two brothers who, apparently, had once been members of Rurik's retinue. So, Russia began to develop with two centres of power, in Kiev and in Novgorod. The next, very significant date in the history of Russia, was 988. This was the Baptism of Russia, when Prince Vladimir, the great-grandson of Rurik, baptized Russia and adopted Orthodoxy, or Eastern Christianity. From this time the centralized Russian state began to strengthen. Why? Because of a single territory, integrated economic ties, one and the same language and, after the Baptism of Russia, the same faith and rule of the Prince. A centralized Russian state began to take shape. Back in the Middle Ages, Prince Yaroslav the Wise introduced the order of succession to the throne, but after he passed away, it became complicated for various reasons. The throne was passed not directly from father to eldest son, but from the prince who had passed away to his brother, then to his sons in different lines. All this led to the fragmentation of Rus as a single state. There was nothing special about it, the same was happening then in Europe. But the fragmented Russian state became an easy prey to the empire created earlier by Genghis Khan. His successors, namely, Batu Khan, came to Rus, plundered and ruined nearly all the cities. The southern part, including Kiev, by the way, and some other cities, simply lost independence, while northern cities preserved some of their sovereignty. They had to pay tribute to the Horde, but they managed to preserve some part of their sovereignty. And then a unified Russian state began to take shape with its centre in Moscow. The southern part of the Russian lands, including Kiev, began to gradually gravitate towards another “magnet” - the centre that was emerging in Europe. This was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It was even called the Lithuanian-Russian Duchy because Russians were a significant part of its population. They spoke the Old Russian language and were Orthodox. But then there was a unification, the union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland. A few years later, another union was signed, but this time already in the religious sphere. Some of the Orthodox priests became subordinate to the Pope. Thus, these lands became part of the Polish-Lithuanian state. For decades, the Poles were engaged in the “Polonization” of this part of the population: they introduced their language there, tried to entrench the idea that this population was not exactly Russians, that because they lived on the fringe (u kraya) they were “Ukrainians.” Originally, the word ‘Ukrainian’ meant that a person was living on the outskirts of the state, near the fringe, or was engaged in border service. It didn't mean any particular ethnic group. So, the Poles were trying in every possible way to polonize that part of the Russian lands and actually treated it rather harshly, not to say cruelly. All that led to the fact that that part of the Russian lands began to struggle for their rights. They wrote letters to Warsaw demanding that their rights be observed and that people be commissioned there, including to Kiev…
The material logos as a form of expeession through which the appolonian-dionysian contradiction processes towards self-overcoming strikes me as a most intriguing answer to Nietzche. Thank you, Haz, for increasing my exposure to this philosopher!
Love to see that bit of grandpa vibe in his voice and attitude, a real familiarity with strangers, the love for the interest in his thought from younger people I think really makes him happy in some way, cant really stress enough how his smile showed a bit at the end. He trusts Infrared. He has confidence in the future of humanity, in spite of literally, everything.
I will try to explain with simple words what dugin said for people who don't understand: 1)the first point that he makes is that human nature or the essence of being human has two dimensions. The first is individuality and it is personal. The second is collectivity. A human is both itself to a degree but it is also other people. That means that humans (unconsciously) tend to think, operate and behave like other people. It is good for a person to have a balanced portion of each dimension within itself. That idea is essentially Heideggerian. (Dasein should be both authentic and inauthentic up to a point). 2)Dugin also analyses the etymology of the english translation of the word dasein to give us some insight of what dasein is. In Heidegger, dasein is the kind of being that is unique to human beings but the translation of dasein is "being there" (or being here). The "there" part refers to the "world". The "world" is a web of interconnected beings that are present to the consciousness of dasein. The "world" is a fundamental aspect of human experience. So "being in the world" is one of dasein's mode of being. 3) Then the problems begin. For Heidegger, dasein is "thrown" into the world. Dasein is thrown into a reality that it didn't choose. So for Heidegger the world is given to us. The problem is that, dugin said that the world isn't given but we create the world. So dugin deviates from Heidegger here and what he does is offering an explanation and a description of what it means to create the world that is very reminiscent of german idealism. 4) Prominent german idealists were Fichte, Schelling and Hegel. Idealists believed that besides the individual there exists a social (collective) self. (This collective self corresponds to the collective dimension of human identity that i mentioned before). Imagine this social self as a fire and each individual is just a spark of this fire. This social self, (the spirit or logos) that transcends individuals is moral self but also has mental capacities and knowing faculties. This self creates the world by a mental act. What we call objective reality outside of us, in german idealism, isn't objective at all. It is always subjective. The object outside of us is placed in a position in space and time by the intuition of the subject (of the self). This intuition is mental faculty of the subject. The existence of the object outside of us is grounded by applying the principle of causality (because our affections that our senses give us must have a cause). But it is the subject that, in its mind, adds a cause. So the world is the mental product of a mental act of the self. That is what we mean when we say that the world isn't given but it is created by the subject. The self creates the world for a moral purpose, for a destination. The social self is being moral when it acts, that means that it manifests its moral worth whem it creates politically organised societies according to its will. This process also gives self consciousness to the self. Civilization and culture are also products of the activity of the social self. 5) Dugin connects Heidegger with german idealism via Hegel. Hegel believe that the spirit (that is the ultimate reality, or the social self) gains self consciousness by a dialectic process in which contradictions are being resolved and synthesised in a higher third phase which contains some elements of the previous unresolved and unsynthesised states. The final destination of this process is called the end of history and it is a utopia. Heidegger on the other hand believed that the fundamental trait of dasein is being forgotten by people and this process began in ancient Greece. So history afterwards was just a steady decline into the "oblivion of being" or "nihilism" which is the alienation of humans from their nature, from the essence of their being. But Heidegger believed that just before the ultimate victory of nihilism, dasein will revolt and it will remember what it means to be. That is the Heideggerian "new beginning". Basically what Heidegger says is that modern people have become "zombies". They are soulless cogs in a machine but that will change. So for dugin, the hegelian "end of history" is just the heideggerian "new beginning". 6) Last but not least, dugin mentions the multiplicity of daseins and logos. That means that there are a lot of social selfs. There is not just one humanity. Each self has its own moral understanding. That means that it has its own worldview. Dugin mentions three worldviews. a)Materialism which corresponds to the logos of Cybele, b)Transcendentalism (or platonism) which corresponds to the logos of Apollo and c) phenomenology which corresponds to the logos of Dionysus. In materialism, being is reduced to matter, in platonism being is transcendent, being is immaterial. So logos of Cybele is the antithesis of the logos of Apollo and logos of Dionysus is in between. For dugin, civilizations are physical manifestations of those three logos. Each civilization contains a degree of every logos. But in theory, these logos are distinct and cannot be synthesized, they are incompatible. So these worldviews are in war with each other in the noetic/ mental sphere. For example, modernity is a pure manifestation of logos of Cybele. That explains why atheism prevails in the west. Dugin once said, in a very religious manner, that every civilization has an angel. This angel is basically the social self from german idealism. Angels fight each other in the noetic sphere but this fight is sometimes is being manifested physically in real war because there are states that embody the spirit those angels.
Okay but what do you actually think the conversation was? Like in non abstract and relatable terms. It's very easy to get creative with words but simplicity always triumphs over pretentious pseudo intellectualism. Going on and on about esoteric and emptyterm is to me.a fruitless exercise and it seems that Dugin was visibly not comfortable with that guy's attempt at impressing him with cool words. In other words, this was childish and ineffective conversation that accomplished nothing.
@@Massin-cz8osI agree with you and had the same reaction. I personally don’t think particularly highly of Dugin.. I Don’t think he’s a villain or bad guy by any stretch, but I also don’t hold him in high regard either. Outside of the fact that he happens to be in a political coalition with some Marxists against some liberals and outside of overlap in some geopolitical matters i don’t see the utility in hitching any sort of wagon to the Dugin train. Haz clearly does think highly of him and took 2 minutes to formulate a long wordy question to impress him with pretentious abstract dribble. Dugin does not even have the level of influence in Russia that he or the western media portray he does and in that context I just don’t see much of a utility of doing this shit if the conversations are like this one and devoid of any practical substance
Haz, you should talk to Telosbound (an Orthodox Christian channel). He praised your work, and he often talks about how human nature, divinely inspired and created by the Holy Trinity, is ontologically communal in nature.
@@vitorangelo8422if you don’t understand just say it. It seems like you’ve been roaming the comment section projecting your inability in the form of jokes😂
Fr some nerds always say the same thing that it's "world salad"Soyu without even actually trying to engage with anything his pfp already tells you what kind of c¥ck he's.
Holy fuck Dugin just kills it with his take on Heidegger’s philosophy of Logos. What a huge interview, to share counsel with one of your biggest influences. I hope you’re able to do more of these.
He explained Heidegger's concept of "Dasein" a bit more complex as it actually is (obviously because English is not his first language, totally understandable); what he meant is that "Dasein" is "being there", that reality is not objectively given to us but rather experienced phenomenologically (i.e. through our senses). The part where he said that it is "not individual nor collective", in a more simplified way, means that it is intersubjective, i.e. dependant upon the dialectical relationship between individual subjectivity and collective subjectivity.
english is my fifth language so it is possible that I also was not entirely clear, I just hope it was a bit clearer and easier to understand than Dugin's explanation here
Dasein isn’t simply “intersubjective”. The risk here would be to interpret Dasein’s being-with as some kind of aggregation of simple-presences. Aside from the fact that Dasein is always mine. I am not an expert and I’d take that with a grain of salt, but Dasein’s “intersubjectivity” is founded on its being-with
In all my many years of watching videos on RUclips or even interacting with people online, only Infrared's community frequently has me writing phrases down so I won't forget to use them in real life. "Hollistic Thinking Presence" is not a phrase I've ever heard when discussing philosophy; maybe because I didn't pay enough attention to Heidegger in the past. Regardless, Infrared Rising. Thank you for the great upload / interview.
I really appreciate how Dugin explained his addition to Heidegger with the logos of Cybele and multiple Dasein in reference to multiple civilizations. Inspires me to read more Heidegger so that I can get into the meat of Dugin's thought and writings. It is unfortunate that the recording was cut short, and I hope either Haz can retell us what they disused, or even for Haz and Dugin to have another discussion but properly recorded or broadcast.
@@vitorangelo8422 LMAO are you arguing no one has tried to stop Infrared? Jackson Hinkle and Haz literally got nuked off of twitch for "russian disinformation" at the request of a Soros funded NGO. Jackson is banned from paypal, youtube, venmo, and a dozen other sites and services. Haz was banned from twitter before Elon took over. Leftists have been at our throats from the very beginning, and now wignat rightists slander us non-stop on twitter. I could keep going. Infrared cannot be stopped, but it isn't that no ones tried to stop Infrared, it's that Infrared has kept on growing despite every attempt to shut us down.
@@vitorangelo8422 You don't think there's any significance to the fact an NGO in cooperation with twitch and the US government banned the only pro-russian streamers who were getting thousands of viewers on twitch? You sound bitter and pathetic. First thing you said "and no one will try", many tried. You have nothing lmao.
@@holbinsk But my sausage IS vegan. should I sue twitch? Will you help me with lawyer fees? Oh man, life isn't fair. Why can't I be a political figure and make money from useful idiots on the internet?
@@tomshaw1015Well, I think if you look at some anthropology you'll be persuaded he's saying something real. In my opinion analytic philosophy is the main global cultural belief. So that Dugin partly doesn't confront NATO/Davos.
Infrared has risen and reached heights never before seen by western Communist, complete faith and determination, infrared can no longer be stopped!! ☀️🦍☀️🦍
Can no longer be stopped = not holding an ounce of political or social power in the country you are trying to change, but courting foreign adversaries who see you guys as useful idiots which might help them advance their own country's agenda
Infrared is transcendent. Our enemies continue to exist in lower dimensions of endless discursive-based uselessness, while we are bending reality to our will to advance important ideas that are finally worthy of our ongoing historical epoch within the 21st century. The discourse is no longer sputtering in an endless menial sectarian nonsense which was dialing the proverbial clock backwards, it is now advancing forward towards the very real singularity which will unleash the future as to rectify the past in a coherent manner.
Well said this is what i have been saying for a while as well and its more apparent by each day this truth that the infrared collective has made this a possibility only by their dialectical method and outlook to media reddit and 4chan gamergate culture is already a necrophiliac form of political discourse at this point.
@@kingpiye7060 very well put. It is almost an act of necrophilia to seriously engage within those spheres of discourse in believing it is the avant garde that considers itself as truly radical or truly outside of the boundaries of the establishment and or to restimulate those brief periods of viral relevancy within such a reactionary insular political space.
As a studied philosophist working on abchair with focus on illiberal, nihilist and anti-democratic thinkers of the 19th and 20th century and their influence on geopolitics, Dugins approach is not just nonsense and misinterpretation of f.e. Heidegger and the system of western democracy, it is just a toxic mixture of many before. If one of my students would write a book like 4th political theory, I would rate it as fraud. I can't believe that this man is considered as extraordinary intellectual.
That is the issue of Dugin (and Heidegger), they misunderstand Marxism, believe that going back to idealism is going to solve problems, that there will be a "revolt of Dasein against the Logos" as if it were real things, which as Marx very well showed, are not. Only a materialist ontology and epistemology can solve the real problems of the real world, ideas are created by material social contexts, not the other way around (a most, ideas serve the purpose to justify and to reproduce cycles of social relations). Ironically, Heidegger has influenced much more and is much more tied to modern post-modern degeneration of thought than most modern thinkers. Post-modern phenomenology, post-structuralism, all derive from Heidegger (and Husserl). So, Nazis (Heidegger), Eurasianists (Dugin) and post-modern liberaloids with green hair and a septum ring share most of their ideologies with each other
This question was so badass, that i had to ponder over it and rewatch this video slowly, to synthesize the meaning of the question and answer. The answer was amazing also. God damn too much 🔥.
INFRARED RISING
As surreal as its to see this i had no doubt always believed in the aesthetic vision of infrared 🦍☀️
Exponentially rising
What does it mean? I don't understand where the meme came from.
I was here
@@SansOrganesLet’s look where our relationship with infrared started from. Where does Haz come from?
The Russian state started to exist as a centralized state in 862. This is considered to be the year of creation of the Russian state because this year the townspeople of Novgorod (a city in the North-West of the country) invited Rurik, a Varangian prince from Scandinavia, to reign. In 1862, Russia celebrated the 1000th anniversary of its statehood, and in Novgorod there is a memorial dedicated to the 1000th anniversary of the country.
In 882, Rurik's successor Prince Oleg, who was, actually, playing the role of regent for Rurik’s young son because Rurik had died by that time, came to Kiev. He ousted two brothers who, apparently, had once been members of Rurik's retinue. So, Russia began to develop with two centres of power, in Kiev and in Novgorod.
The next, very significant date in the history of Russia, was 988. This was the Baptism of Russia, when Prince Vladimir, the great-grandson of Rurik, baptized Russia and adopted Orthodoxy, or Eastern Christianity. From this time the centralized Russian state began to strengthen. Why? Because of a single territory, integrated economic ties, one and the same language and, after the Baptism of Russia, the same faith and rule of the Prince. A centralized Russian state began to take shape.
Back in the Middle Ages, Prince Yaroslav the Wise introduced the order of succession to the throne, but after he passed away, it became complicated for various reasons. The throne was passed not directly from father to eldest son, but from the prince who had passed away to his brother, then to his sons in different lines. All this led to the fragmentation of Rus as a single state. There was nothing special about it, the same was happening then in Europe. But the fragmented Russian state became an easy prey to the empire created earlier by Genghis Khan. His successors, namely, Batu Khan, came to Rus, plundered and ruined nearly all the cities. The southern part, including Kiev, by the way, and some other cities, simply lost independence, while northern cities preserved some of their sovereignty. They had to pay tribute to the Horde, but they managed to preserve some part of their sovereignty. And then a unified Russian state began to take shape with its centre in Moscow.
The southern part of the Russian lands, including Kiev, began to gradually gravitate towards another “magnet” - the centre that was emerging in Europe. This was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It was even called the Lithuanian-Russian Duchy because Russians were a significant part of its population. They spoke the Old Russian language and were Orthodox. But then there was a unification, the union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Kingdom of Poland. A few years later, another union was signed, but this time already in the religious sphere. Some of the Orthodox priests became subordinate to the Pope. Thus, these lands became part of the Polish-Lithuanian state.
For decades, the Poles were engaged in the “Polonization” of this part of the population: they introduced their language there, tried to entrench the idea that this population was not exactly Russians, that because they lived on the fringe (u kraya) they were “Ukrainians.” Originally, the word ‘Ukrainian’ meant that a person was living on the outskirts of the state, near the fringe, or was engaged in border service. It didn't mean any particular ethnic group.
So, the Poles were trying in every possible way to polonize that part of the Russian lands and actually treated it rather harshly, not to say cruelly. All that led to the fact that that part of the Russian lands began to struggle for their rights. They wrote letters to Warsaw demanding that their rights be observed and that people be commissioned there, including to Kiev…
from 30 VIEWERS TO INTERVIEWING DUGIN its good to see this become a reality beautiful stuff
Can't believe you're still with us i take everything i said back I'm glad I'm seeing this with you.
He done real good. Proud of Haze
infrared rising
I love you ZoloLacan you're my goat. Let's continue to promote Aoba-Turanic thought in the forecoming future.
@@novuki weeb trash
Infrared Haz has revealed how hard work and discipline can exponentially grow within five years.
Why all these comments with the same pictogram in the username? What does it mean or are you all bots?
@@hydeparkist they are channel members
@@hydeparkist hover your mouse over the icon
@@johnny4221 Thanks!
Yeahhhh boy
Here from the beginning.
The same way infrared grew my understanding of the world grow with it.
Thank you Haz infrared rising up to heaven
The material logos as a form of expeession through which the appolonian-dionysian contradiction processes towards self-overcoming strikes me as a most intriguing answer to Nietzche. Thank you, Haz, for increasing my exposure to this philosopher!
Love to see that bit of grandpa vibe in his voice and attitude, a real familiarity with strangers, the love for the interest in his thought from younger people I think really makes him happy in some way, cant really stress enough how his smile showed a bit at the end. He trusts Infrared. He has confidence in the future of humanity, in spite of literally, everything.
Banger. I love how this opens with a 2 min question from Haz
Doesnt take much to excite you I can see
Love it when you guys deep dive into serious theory. What a treat it must have been to converse with Prof Dugin!
I will try to explain with simple words what dugin said for people who don't understand:
1)the first point that he makes is that human nature or the essence of being human has two dimensions. The first is individuality and it is personal. The second is collectivity. A human is both itself to a degree but it is also other people. That means that humans (unconsciously) tend to think, operate and behave like other people. It is good for a person to have a balanced portion of each dimension within itself. That idea is essentially Heideggerian. (Dasein should be both authentic and inauthentic up to a point).
2)Dugin also analyses the etymology of the english translation of the word dasein to give us some insight of what dasein is. In Heidegger, dasein is the kind of being that is unique to human beings but the translation of dasein is "being there" (or being here). The "there" part refers to the "world". The "world" is a web of interconnected beings that are present to the consciousness of dasein. The "world" is a fundamental aspect of human experience. So "being in the world" is one of dasein's mode of being.
3) Then the problems begin. For Heidegger, dasein is "thrown" into the world. Dasein is thrown into a reality that it didn't choose. So for Heidegger the world is given to us. The problem is that, dugin said that the world isn't given but we create the world. So dugin deviates from Heidegger here and what he does is offering an explanation and a description of what it means to create the world that is very reminiscent of german idealism.
4) Prominent german idealists were Fichte, Schelling and Hegel. Idealists believed that besides the individual there exists a social (collective) self. (This collective self corresponds to the collective dimension of human identity that i mentioned before). Imagine this social self as a fire and each individual is just a spark of this fire. This social self, (the spirit or logos) that transcends individuals is moral self but also has mental capacities and knowing faculties. This self creates the world by a mental act. What we call objective reality outside of us, in german idealism, isn't objective at all. It is always subjective. The object outside of us is placed in a position in space and time by the intuition of the subject (of the self). This intuition is mental faculty of the subject. The existence of the object outside of us is grounded by applying the principle of causality (because our affections that our senses give us must have a cause). But it is the subject that, in its mind, adds a cause. So the world is the mental product of a mental act of the self. That is what we mean when we say that the world isn't given but it is created by the subject. The self creates the world for a moral purpose, for a destination. The social self is being moral when it acts, that means that it manifests its moral worth whem it creates politically organised societies according to its will. This process also gives self consciousness to the self. Civilization and culture are also products of the activity of the social self.
5) Dugin connects Heidegger with german idealism via Hegel. Hegel believe that the spirit (that is the ultimate reality, or the social self) gains self consciousness by a dialectic process in which contradictions are being resolved and synthesised in a higher third phase which contains some elements of the previous unresolved and unsynthesised states. The final destination of this process is called the end of history and it is a utopia. Heidegger on the other hand believed that the fundamental trait of dasein is being forgotten by people and this process began in ancient Greece. So history afterwards was just a steady decline into the "oblivion of being" or "nihilism" which is the alienation of humans from their nature, from the essence of their being. But Heidegger believed that just before the ultimate victory of nihilism, dasein will revolt and it will remember what it means to be. That is the Heideggerian "new beginning". Basically what Heidegger says is that modern people have become "zombies". They are soulless cogs in a machine but that will change. So for dugin, the hegelian "end of history" is just the heideggerian "new beginning".
6) Last but not least, dugin mentions the multiplicity of daseins and logos. That means that there are a lot of social selfs. There is not just one humanity. Each self has its own moral understanding. That means that it has its own worldview. Dugin mentions three worldviews. a)Materialism which corresponds to the logos of Cybele, b)Transcendentalism (or platonism) which corresponds to the logos of Apollo and c) phenomenology which corresponds to the logos of Dionysus. In materialism, being is reduced to matter, in platonism being is transcendent, being is immaterial. So logos of Cybele is the antithesis of the logos of Apollo and logos of Dionysus is in between. For dugin, civilizations are physical manifestations of those three logos. Each civilization contains a degree of every logos. But in theory, these logos are distinct and cannot be synthesized, they are incompatible. So these worldviews are in war with each other in the noetic/ mental sphere. For example, modernity is a pure manifestation of logos of Cybele. That explains why atheism prevails in the west. Dugin once said, in a very religious manner, that every civilization has an angel. This angel is basically the social self from german idealism. Angels fight each other in the noetic sphere but this fight is sometimes is being manifested physically in real war because there are states that embody the spirit those angels.
Great summary, thanks for sharing.
Thanks.
You are a philosophical angel.
THIS IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR YEARS! HOPEFULLY MORE TO COME!
Dugin, the Grand Wizard of Eurasia, absolutely spit straight enchantations of truth and life in the interview by the Great Khan, Haz Al-Din of America
Professor Dugin is one the most important thinkers of our time, this was a very interesting and fruitful conversation
Indeed
Okay but what do you actually think the conversation was? Like in non abstract and relatable terms. It's very easy to get creative with words but simplicity always triumphs over pretentious pseudo intellectualism.
Going on and on about esoteric and emptyterm is to me.a fruitless exercise and it seems that Dugin was visibly not comfortable with that guy's attempt at impressing him with cool words.
In other words, this was childish and ineffective conversation that accomplished nothing.
@@Massin-cz8osI agree with you and had the same reaction. I personally don’t think particularly highly of Dugin.. I Don’t think he’s a villain or bad guy by any stretch, but I also don’t hold him in high regard either. Outside of the fact that he happens to be in a political coalition with some Marxists against some liberals and outside of overlap in some geopolitical matters i don’t see the utility in hitching any sort of wagon to the Dugin train. Haz clearly does think highly of him and took 2 minutes to formulate a long wordy question to impress him with pretentious abstract dribble. Dugin does not even have the level of influence in Russia that he or the western media portray he does and in that context I just don’t see much of a utility of doing this shit if the conversations are like this one and devoid of any practical substance
this man cant stop thinking no matter what happens, if not he who will think for us? when he dies who will do the hard thinking for us mere mortals?
He's nowhere close to being one of the most important thinkers, whatever that means.
From debating obese leftists on Twitch to interviewing Dugin. Incredible trajectory, Mr. Haz. Best of luck to you going forward. INFRARED RISING! 🦍☀️
I don't think this is said enough, but this is one of the interviews on RUclips.
TRVE
Haz, you should talk to Telosbound (an Orthodox Christian channel). He praised your work, and he often talks about how human nature, divinely inspired and created by the Holy Trinity, is ontologically communal in nature.
I am curious. When did he praise Inrared/haz? Checking it out, thanks.
Yep he should talk to actual honest ortho christians like him instead of charlatans like jay dyer and oc canonist.
Good idea
@@derek123wil0 There is a video called “Haz is right about Descartes: Orthodox Christianity and Marxism”!
THIS IS GONNA BE IN THE HISTORY BOOKS
We've been waiting for this unification of intellects
A conversation for the ages. Landmark moment for Infrared holy shit
they spoke words, holy shit, my brain is melting
@@vitorangelo8422if you don’t understand just say it. It seems like you’ve been roaming the comment section projecting your inability in the form of jokes😂
Fr some nerds always say the same thing that it's "world salad"Soyu without even actually trying to engage with anything his pfp already tells you what kind of c¥ck he's.
@@userX_00 If you're gonna say something useless like that try at least to make it funny or something, you're more creative than that
@@userX_00 nice playlists btw how old are you? I too love ghetto music
History in the Making right here:
Holy fuck Dugin just kills it with his take on Heidegger’s philosophy of Logos.
What a huge interview, to share counsel with one of your biggest influences. I hope you’re able to do more of these.
He explained Heidegger's concept of "Dasein" a bit more complex as it actually is (obviously because English is not his first language, totally understandable); what he meant is that "Dasein" is "being there", that reality is not objectively given to us but rather experienced phenomenologically (i.e. through our senses).
The part where he said that it is "not individual nor collective", in a more simplified way, means that it is intersubjective, i.e. dependant upon the dialectical relationship between individual subjectivity and collective subjectivity.
english is my fifth language so it is possible that I also was not entirely clear, I just hope it was a bit clearer and easier to understand than Dugin's explanation here
Your english is very eloquent thanks for elucidating on what he said 👍
Thanks for clearing that up. That was the only part that left me confused.
this is wrong. you should read Heidegger
Dasein isn’t simply “intersubjective”.
The risk here would be to interpret Dasein’s being-with as some kind of aggregation of simple-presences.
Aside from the fact that Dasein is always mine.
I am not an expert and I’d take that with a grain of salt, but Dasein’s “intersubjectivity” is founded on its being-with
In all my many years of watching videos on RUclips or even interacting with people online, only Infrared's community frequently has me writing phrases down so I won't forget to use them in real life. "Hollistic Thinking Presence" is not a phrase I've ever heard when discussing philosophy; maybe because I didn't pay enough attention to Heidegger in the past. Regardless, Infrared Rising. Thank you for the great upload / interview.
Watching Haz literally doubled my intelligence on philosophy, theory etc.
Infrared has risen, is rising and will rise
The Fate of humanity starts here
INFRARED HAS BEEN RISING
What does it mean? I don't understand where the meme came from.
What a legendary moment. Glad to be here to share in these developments.
i was there
What an incredible opportunity
I got the chills from this
I really appreciate how Dugin explained his addition to Heidegger with the logos of Cybele and multiple Dasein in reference to multiple civilizations. Inspires me to read more Heidegger so that I can get into the meat of Dugin's thought and writings. It is unfortunate that the recording was cut short, and I hope either Haz can retell us what they disused, or even for Haz and Dugin to have another discussion but properly recorded or broadcast.
Thank you for posting this Haz! INFRARED RISING
Fantastic discussion between two brilliant theoreticians.
Infrared cannot be stopped
and no one will try... i wonder why
@@vitorangelo8422 LMAO are you arguing no one has tried to stop Infrared? Jackson Hinkle and Haz literally got nuked off of twitch for "russian disinformation" at the request of a Soros funded NGO. Jackson is banned from paypal, youtube, venmo, and a dozen other sites and services. Haz was banned from twitter before Elon took over. Leftists have been at our throats from the very beginning, and now wignat rightists slander us non-stop on twitter. I could keep going. Infrared cannot be stopped, but it isn't that no ones tried to stop Infrared, it's that Infrared has kept on growing despite every attempt to shut us down.
@@holbinsk I got banned from twitch because I said "my sausage is vegan" to a vegan
@@vitorangelo8422 You don't think there's any significance to the fact an NGO in cooperation with twitch and the US government banned the only pro-russian streamers who were getting thousands of viewers on twitch? You sound bitter and pathetic. First thing you said "and no one will try", many tried. You have nothing lmao.
@@holbinsk But my sausage IS vegan. should I sue twitch? Will you help me with lawyer fees? Oh man, life isn't fair. Why can't I be a political figure and make money from useful idiots on the internet?
This should be the next Mt Rushmore right here
INFRARED RISING
Very kind of Haz to give this guy an opportunity to speak on his plattform
Unbelievably based! Super glad this got uploaded
WE ARE SO BACK
The gravity of this moment for Haz must be momentous.
@@Oplix He loves being embarrassed? Being proven wrong? Getting spanked by adults?
Сиквел к знаменитой попытке изучить диалектику Гегеля за полтора часа.
Leftoids can’t even compete.
Infrared rising
Dugin is deepening his thinking of Dasein.
Yes, yes. And my brain is deepening in its socket.
@@tomshaw1015Well, I think if you look at some anthropology you'll be persuaded he's saying something real.
In my opinion analytic philosophy is the main global cultural belief. So that Dugin partly doesn't confront NATO/Davos.
It’s absolutely unreal what tremendous progress has been made. Our rise is indeed inevitable
Video with Dugin. Nicely done, Haz!
Haz!!! I'm so freaking proud!! ❤
Excellent. You must have more talks with Dugin. I recommend a 1 on 1 with a more casual setting.
Absolutely stunning! Bravo!
Jackson has no clue what they’re talking about
😂😂😂
Hard for anyone born under a society of Anglo mentality to understand Dugin on a deep level
Infrared has risen and reached heights never before seen by western Communist, complete faith and determination, infrared can no longer be stopped!! ☀️🦍☀️🦍
Can no longer be stopped = not holding an ounce of political or social power in the country you are trying to change, but courting foreign adversaries who see you guys as useful idiots which might help them advance their own country's agenda
@@pacific2313That which exists exists to be transmuted. We are its process of transmutation
@@pacific2313Dugin is an enemy of the deep state not to the American people,You "people" are just eunuchs of the empire is what you really are.
@@pacific2313 "their own country's agenda" = create a multi-polar world where the West is an equal partner instead of global hegemon
Awesome
We need more of this type of content
Great things in the works. Infrared rising!
Infrared is the Marxism-Leninism i needed breadtube is dusted
>breadtube
>Marxist-Leninism
@@ClassWarMatrix Same difference. You'll realize it sooner or later.
@@theshakhrayist7649 first time?
@@Inyayo More like 80th.
Wow it really happened.
The last time i saw this guy, was shouting at a guy with mongolian throat singing in the background, imagine how confused I am.
U aint been paying attention
Amazing things are happening
JUST STELLAR‼️‼️‼️
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Great video!
It’s been a long time coming.
Hot damn! This was released so much faster than I thought it would be.
The madman actually did it!
It's shit like this that restores my faith in humanity
Based
BASED! INFRARED RISING
Haz is going places
Infrared Rising
Amazing talk! I only wish it had gone on longer.
Infrared has accelerated into a state of unstoppable motion
Infrared Rising!
Infrared is transcendent. Our enemies continue to exist in lower dimensions of endless discursive-based uselessness, while we are bending reality to our will to advance important ideas that are finally worthy of our ongoing historical epoch within the 21st century.
The discourse is no longer sputtering in an endless menial sectarian nonsense which was dialing the proverbial clock backwards, it is now advancing forward towards the very real singularity which will unleash the future as to rectify the past in a coherent manner.
Well said this is what i have been saying for a while as well and its more apparent by each day this truth that the infrared collective has made this a possibility only by their dialectical method and outlook to media reddit and 4chan gamergate culture is already a necrophiliac form of political discourse at this point.
@@kingpiye7060 very well put. It is almost an act of necrophilia to seriously engage within those spheres of discourse in believing it is the avant garde that considers itself as truly radical or truly outside of the boundaries of the establishment and or to restimulate those brief periods of viral relevancy within such a reactionary insular political space.
Great quest super cool you all got to sit down and talk. What an amazing trip it must have been.
I feel dugin must have known Ken Wilbur lotta spectrum of consciousness. Great book btw
Alhamdullilah infrared is rising
allashamadabataha peace be upon his colon
Great talk
We made it
I wish I was smart enough to understand what Dugin is saying
English is not his 1st language so the speech delivery might not be up to par with his genius written works.
Beautiful! The future is inevitable.
As a studied philosophist working on abchair with focus on illiberal, nihilist and anti-democratic thinkers of the 19th and 20th century and their influence on geopolitics, Dugins approach is not just nonsense and misinterpretation of f.e. Heidegger and the system of western democracy, it is just a toxic mixture of many before. If one of my students would write a book like 4th political theory, I would rate it as fraud. I can't believe that this man is considered as extraordinary intellectual.
Debate Haz
WOW, Congratz man !!!
That is the issue of Dugin (and Heidegger), they misunderstand Marxism, believe that going back to idealism is going to solve problems, that there will be a "revolt of Dasein against the Logos" as if it were real things, which as Marx very well showed, are not. Only a materialist ontology and epistemology can solve the real problems of the real world, ideas are created by material social contexts, not the other way around (a most, ideas serve the purpose to justify and to reproduce cycles of social relations).
Ironically, Heidegger has influenced much more and is much more tied to modern post-modern degeneration of thought than most modern thinkers. Post-modern phenomenology, post-structuralism, all derive from Heidegger (and Husserl). So, Nazis (Heidegger), Eurasianists (Dugin) and post-modern liberaloids with green hair and a septum ring share most of their ideologies with each other
A historic moment without a doubt!
Holy BASED! I hope you have more videos from Russia and China!!!
This question was so badass, that i had to ponder over it and rewatch this video slowly, to synthesize the meaning of the question and answer. The answer was amazing also. God damn too much 🔥.
RIP Darya
Don't cry for the stupid.
Denazified but not forgotten 😢😂
Thanks to Professor Dugin and Haz--this was a true treat!
IT'S HAPPENING
Pretty interesting discussion. Wish it were longer
“There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.”
Amazing
I can't believe my eyes. Holy BASED.
Guancha MVP
This is just the start of things to come
Crazy how quickly Infrared grew from being a small channel to changing leftist discourse and now they're in Russia interviewing modern philosophers
BASED
Woah! What a meeting!❤
The end of history ?
No.
History is only beginning
INFRARED CAN NOT BE STOPPED
Very informative
INFRARED WILL KEEP ON RISING.
Excellent discussion.