Astra rocket fails to deliver NASA TROPICS satellites - See the launch

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 июн 2022
  • Astra's 43-foot-tall (13 meters) Launch Vehicle 0010 (LV0010) lifted off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on June 12, 2022 with NASA's TROPICS-1 mission. It failed to deliver the cubesats due to the upper stage engine shutting down early. Full Story: www.space.com/astra-rocket-la...
    Credit: Astra / NASASpaceflight
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 2,1 тыс.

  • @ozgott1415
    @ozgott1415 Год назад +430

    Imagine spending millions of dollars and years of hard work to build a functioning satellite and then hiring the underdog to deliver it to save a few bucks.

    • @semlohde1
      @semlohde1 Год назад +39

      Like the guvmnt - aircraft maintained by the lowest bidder.

    • @JWEFamily
      @JWEFamily Год назад +25

      sad but u right bro

    • @eamonia
      @eamonia Год назад +41

      Should have had Bezos do it. Get it!? Because the only thing he's got into orbit is his ego.

    • @yehimstone5492
      @yehimstone5492 Год назад +33

      @@eamonia bezos' big space achievement is giving captin kirk a few seconds of weightlessness.

    • @eamonia
      @eamonia Год назад +7

      @@yehimstone5492 I can't wait until someone else comes along and offers Mr. Kirk an opportunity to go to REAL space. Not that I'm disparaging the once in a lifetime experience that so many yern for, that he had the opportunity to take part in (breaking the Karmen line) but I just really hope that he gets to go to REAL space.

  • @peterbrehmj
    @peterbrehmj Год назад +176

    The failure occurs about 10 seconds after 7:20.

  • @brutucas5904
    @brutucas5904 Год назад +196

    Space x makes it look easy but this is just a reminder how hard space flight really is.

    • @maoozkhan9828
      @maoozkhan9828 Год назад +4

      Right 👍

    • @ktmenifee
      @ktmenifee Год назад +2

      Didn't we go to the moon and back a bunch of times without any hitches ??? Lol

    • @Paul51178
      @Paul51178 Год назад

      @@ktmenifee Apollo 13?

    • @EnzoFerenczyo
      @EnzoFerenczyo Год назад +5

      @@Paul51178 Apollo 1 was the most serious failure, 3 astronauts died. still on the ground.

    • @Paul51178
      @Paul51178 Год назад +1

      @@EnzoFerenczyo True, but it wasn't a failed attempt to get to the moon, it was ground testing.

  • @saqibmudabbar
    @saqibmudabbar Год назад +185

    This just shows how hard spacex has worked to make such a complicated task look easy.

    • @antoniolsls7774
      @antoniolsls7774 Год назад +5

      It fail 3 Times it didnt look easy at all

    • @hokucurnan2183
      @hokucurnan2183 Год назад +1

      Absolutely no one thinks the task looks easy lol

    • @saqibmudabbar
      @saqibmudabbar Год назад +1

      @@hokucurnan2183 lol. You'd be surprised.

    • @morbidmanmusic
      @morbidmanmusic Год назад +2

      Yeah, it only took space x 50 years to do what NASA did with bubble gum and a calculator....

    • @j73wa
      @j73wa Год назад +5

      It shows how good the Russians are in rocket technology.

  • @james5460
    @james5460 Год назад +71

    I like how they always just go silent when the catastrophe occurs.

    • @iandonnelly959
      @iandonnelly959 Год назад +12

      Better than "Oh Fuck" or something lmao

    • @Network126
      @Network126 Год назад +25

      @@iandonnelly959 Would be more fitting to hear F-bombs flying all over the room 😆

    • @iandonnelly959
      @iandonnelly959 Год назад +7

      @@Network126 Oh, it happened down on the factory floor lmao

    • @StrokeMahEgo
      @StrokeMahEgo Год назад +9

      Muted mics so you can't hear the f bombs lol

    • @mrzorg
      @mrzorg Год назад +3

      @6:30, did you notice the impact with something? Or the upper stage tank blew out. Only thing I can think of.

  • @brucehanna9473
    @brucehanna9473 Год назад +75

    Getting off this planet and into orbit is incredibly hard. I hope everything works out and problems can be fixed. Rooting for all spacefaring companies to have many successes now and in the future!! Bump in the road, Astra. Keep moving forward!

    • @arturmeinild2461
      @arturmeinild2461 Год назад +2

      And yet, SpaceX make it look so incredibly easy! 😁😎

    • @MAGGOT_VOMIT
      @MAGGOT_VOMIT Год назад +3

      Everyone else angrily shakes fist!! 🤣

    • @Richarkin
      @Richarkin Год назад +1

      @@arturmeinild2461 same as the Russians …but still they had Lot of failures too

    • @ez1913
      @ez1913 Год назад +1

      I hope their budget is cut to shreds because of this epic fail. I can throw my own tax money in the ocean. Let them splash their own cash.

    • @brucehanna9473
      @brucehanna9473 Год назад +1

      @@arturmeinild2461 SpaceX had their share of failures. It happens. The key is to never make the same mistake twice.

  • @SomeBoredGuy69
    @SomeBoredGuy69 Год назад +144

    It sucks to see a failure. I know how much each launch means to every team member. I feel for you all.

    • @oltch.
      @oltch. Год назад

      BS. This company knew or had a pretty good idea it wasnt gonna launch properly but cuz of deadlines and bureaucracy etc, they decided just to launch a bunk rocket. Theres a reason Astra doesnt get contracts... Just stealing money from the American Taxpayers....

    • @Judaspriest66624
      @Judaspriest66624 Год назад +2

      NASA should learn a thing or two from Indians, India has fantastic launch records

    • @happycamperinc.
      @happycamperinc. Год назад +4

      @@Judaspriest66624 yep. spaceX is doing things so cheap too. And in future spaceX will be more cheaper than isro. But ISRO is doing great. And no hate for NASA for being expensive .

    • @gomahklawm4446
      @gomahklawm4446 Год назад

      7:29

    • @Countcho
      @Countcho Год назад +2

      @@Judaspriest66624 this is not nasa. America has nasa and private space industries

  • @brandenjones716
    @brandenjones716 Год назад +18

    Man, failure only makes you better, I know this feels really bad and rough. But hoapfully this group gets to keep trying. This whole team is doing amazing work. Keep at it!!!!!!

    • @weissrw1
      @weissrw1 Год назад

      I hope none of my tax dollars went into this flop. But so, I hope somebody gets fired -- somebody high up!

  • @michaelhowell2541
    @michaelhowell2541 Год назад +337

    Second engine failure one minute before insertion. Shame. Rocket science is HARD! Better luck next launch, Astra.✌️🖖🇺🇸

    • @alfonso8155
      @alfonso8155 Год назад +8

      You are right rocket science is hard as aircraft aviation industry. Ask Boeing!. Shame!. Better luck next time!. Perhaps you can save some souls. 🇪🇺 😇🤗🖖👌

    • @andrewtingle2418
      @andrewtingle2418 Год назад +7

      1 minute in launch terms is a lifetime!

    • @KonaBalona
      @KonaBalona Год назад +16

      Best they leave it to the pros...nasa is a waste of money

    • @psilver063
      @psilver063 Год назад

      It’s only hard to NASA anymore. They have more failures with active payloads than anyone. Yea they been doing it longer but launches are happening at a exponential rate today compared to before and NASA is wasting our tax dollars on stuff they have long been proven can be more efficient when given to a 3rd party. Stop wasting our money if you want to keep using it. SpaceX seems to have rocketry down pretty solid considering they land their 1st stages back on the planet. With active payloads they have what 1-2 failures? Out of 100’s of launches?

    • @zzzxxzzz3248
      @zzzxxzzz3248 Год назад +21

      NASA should stick with SpaceX !

  • @desmond-hawkins
    @desmond-hawkins Год назад +211

    Such bad news… I don't know how much longer Astra can carry on with so many failures. The consequences are also really different when you're carrying and losing a real payload, and there will no doubt be people blaming those who took a chance on Astra for this launch. What company or organization is going to risk their payload with them now? I'm sure they will figure it out eventually given the funding and launch opportunities, but I'm worried that no one will entrust them with a launch now. I still hope they can recover from this, but it's not looking good. *edit:* they do have contracts for several more launches, including two more for NASA's TROPICS mission. This was 2 out 6 satellites for TROPICS, and they have 2 more launches planned. I don't know how this failure will affect these contracts, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a clause that let NASA back out from remaining launches in case of failure.

    • @Dularr
      @Dularr Год назад +15

      All about insurance. If the insurance companies payout, they can build more satellites.

    • @anonymoussoul3343
      @anonymoussoul3343 Год назад +8

      Will the payload get back to the ground?

    • @utpharmboy2006
      @utpharmboy2006 Год назад

      nasa is becomming a joke. Elon is our man if he can't do it no one can.

    • @buddtwin2
      @buddtwin2 Год назад +14

      @@Dularr not always true but yes insurance pays for the loss but insurance can not cover the loss time. Some of these satellites take a long time to build then time for integration, getting a spot for delivering payload to space ext. takes a long time and a lot of man power to setup

    • @bobguy6542
      @bobguy6542 Год назад

      This was a real payload.

  • @edsherwood2173
    @edsherwood2173 Год назад +1

    Appreciate all there hard work, space is hard hopefully they’re able to stick with it

  • @mikeburch2998
    @mikeburch2998 Год назад

    I'm very sorry to hear of this setback. Just keep trying and never give up. Greetings from Arizona.

  • @radamus210
    @radamus210 Год назад +149

    As the saying goes, "You learn more from a failure than when everything goes perfect"

    • @lancetruong4957
      @lancetruong4957 Год назад

      Was this the second failure they had recently?

    • @dbreardon
      @dbreardon Год назад +5

      Unfortunately, they are having more failures than success. They have had 10 launches and only 2 successes. That is a 20% success rate (although i will give them the first two launches - also failures, but they were the test systems for their rocket). Still a very high failure rate.

    • @heep34987yt
      @heep34987yt Год назад +1

      Hopefully they can get up to speed, at this rate I’m not sure clients (or future clients) are going to be up for rolling the dice and hope it works.

    • @waybee100
      @waybee100 Год назад

      what a stupid fucking statement.

    • @snakedoctor2048
      @snakedoctor2048 Год назад +1

      they definitely can learn something from the Chinese !

  • @marktracy586
    @marktracy586 Год назад +62

    It seems they have issues with stability. On board view of each flight show much more control movements than you would expect.

    • @iandonnelly959
      @iandonnelly959 Год назад +4

      I think this is due to being a really small rocket. Much more influenced by atmospheric conditions than something like a F9

    • @recoilrob324
      @recoilrob324 Год назад +3

      @@iandonnelly959 The excessive control movements were evident in the second stage which is well above interference with the atmosphere. I'm guessing that there was combustion instability within the bell which will create unwanted side thrust. "The second stage engine shut down early" they say...looked like it was more like "the second stage engine blew up". "Shutting down early" makes it sound like it was just something little....that engine looked like it failed with a bunch of fuel being sprayed once the chamber let go.
      Hey...the reason it costs a lot to put stuff into space is it's HARD to do it. SpaceX makes it look routine but is far from that and I understand people wanting to have more than one company able to launch satellites, but people funding these little and so far unsuccessful attempts make me wonder why they didn't just contract with SpaceX in the first place and save a LOT of money...plus get their satellites into orbit.

    • @BMrider75
      @BMrider75 Год назад

      As that 2nd stage burnt fuel it got lighter. I wonder if the instability occurred at that point due to changing centre of mass ?

    • @iandonnelly959
      @iandonnelly959 Год назад +2

      @@recoilrob324 Well Tropics didn't use a spaceX rideshare because spacex doesn't fly to this orbit. So to fly on spacex would have cost a full launch price which is like 10x more expensive I believe. But also, probably wouldn't have failed lol. And I'm guessing some sort of oscillation in the second stage thrust vector control, but we'll see when the data is reviewed!

    • @nathanmussonbody
      @nathanmussonbody Год назад

      @@recoilrob324 Rocket Lab seem to be able to do it on a consistent basis

  • @SnowHarp
    @SnowHarp Год назад +4

    I am so sorry this happened, I am sure they all worked hard on this prep and launch - what a bummer. Commiserations to Astra. Hopefully they will resolve the issue and try again soon. Shame the satellites were lost I guess. Margin for error is zero.

  • @DrTubeman
    @DrTubeman Год назад +4

    It looked like the second stage didnt even ignite to its full power to begin with, going by the amount of glow and exhaust flare coming from the second stage engine?

  • @mpbroadcast
    @mpbroadcast Год назад +329

    Very sad to see. Hopefully Astra has enough resources for another few tries. As much as I'm a fan of SpaceX, it would be terrific to see the US have a variety of private launch providers covering all market segments.
    Although it is a worn out and overused phrase, when it comes to creating a vigorous space industry, diversity is indeed a strength. This country needs Astra and the other launch providers to succeed so the industry can continue to be seeded with new ideas and innovation.

    • @michaelwachendorf2096
      @michaelwachendorf2096 Год назад +4

      Yeah but how much money has to be burned before they get it? Hope it's soon

    • @chipblood
      @chipblood Год назад +2

      I love Astra's system. It's perfect for these types of missions. They sure need a win right now though.

    • @Yusuke_Denton
      @Yusuke_Denton Год назад +19

      I recall even SpaceX was only one launch away from bankruptcy at some point. Not an industry for the faint of heart for sure.

    • @benitosalazar3749
      @benitosalazar3749 Год назад +2

      You are correct about having "diversity." Someone needs to fail so that others may learn from them.

    • @waybee100
      @waybee100 Год назад +3

      nasa has been around a long time, space x not so much, has done a hell of a lot better.

  • @mr.manfredjensenjen7294
    @mr.manfredjensenjen7294 Год назад +174

    Hang in there team. Always rooting for the space industry to succeed. You are definitely up there.

    • @yellowcat1310
      @yellowcat1310 Год назад +3

      up where? up where the earth's curve is concave? 3:29

    • @PrimordialEconomics
      @PrimordialEconomics Год назад

      @@yellowcat1310 dumb.

    • @Yusuke_Denton
      @Yusuke_Denton Год назад +2

      @@yellowcat1310 What does that tell you?

    • @yellowcat1310
      @yellowcat1310 Год назад +1

      @@Yusuke_Denton that they use a gopro and can not rely on a normal camera. they only use a camera that shows a curve, at least at a certain angle. then no matter what, no matter how many times they see the concave portions of the video, they will still swear that the convex parts "show the curve of the earth"
      what does it tell you?

    • @waybee100
      @waybee100 Год назад +1

      space x much better, nasa a waste money.

  • @DirtyLilHobo
    @DirtyLilHobo Год назад +102

    The second stage had a catastrophic failure with forty-five seconds or so left in the burn. The velocity was around 6430 m/sec but they needed 7450 m/sec. When the bear bites, he bites hard!!

    • @gomahklawm4446
      @gomahklawm4446 Год назад +7

      7:29 Time codes aren't difficult.

    • @jefsel881
      @jefsel881 Год назад +1

      That’s roughly 14500 mph at an altitude of 350 miles? How is that possible?

    • @markrichards9646
      @markrichards9646 Год назад +3

      The ISS orbits at about 250 miles while traveling at 17,500 mph. It only takes it about 90 minutes to orbit the Earth.

    • @MAGGOT_VOMIT
      @MAGGOT_VOMIT Год назад +4

      "GUBMINT DO TAKE A BITE, DON'T SHE??" - Raising Arizona 🤣

    • @kinnai8334
      @kinnai8334 Год назад

      @@jefsel881 That's how orbits work sir!

  • @gringadoor5385
    @gringadoor5385 Год назад +25

    Failure is expected. Cutting away from it to save face and ending on a single monotone sentence doesn't build confidence. It makes you look pathetic.

  • @Trex531
    @Trex531 Год назад +7

    Ugh, almost there! Keep on Astra, you will learn something new for sure which will let you improve your rocket.

  • @alessandrabazzoffi5015
    @alessandrabazzoffi5015 Год назад +11

    What wonderful images of our planet the Astra rocket is showing us 😃

  • @JonnyDoe1776
    @JonnyDoe1776 Год назад

    I want to know where that microphone was that recorded all of that rocket noise after it launched. Was it on the rocket or just dubbed in??

  • @turanamo
    @turanamo Год назад +8

    Failure occurs at around 7:28 when the velocity counts back from 6575m/s. You can tell it's falling to earth by the look on the operator's face.

    • @Slapwapy
      @Slapwapy Год назад

      Falling to earth you say at altitude +500km

    • @turanamo
      @turanamo Год назад +1

      @@Slapwapy Yes, all objects in lower orbit fall towards the earth at some point. Basic science dude.

    • @Slapwapy
      @Slapwapy Год назад +1

      @@turanamo Crap load of stuff is then going to start dropping

    • @turanamo
      @turanamo Год назад

      @@Slapwapy Nope, which is why attitude determination and control subsystem (ADCS) in conjunction with telemetry correction is used to offset drag effects by a booster.

    • @logitech4873
      @logitech4873 Год назад

      @@Slapwapy Do you not understand how orbits work?

  • @Smokey1981
    @Smokey1981 Год назад +10

    The velocity just stops and starts slowly going down and dude just stops talking..Damn. That was an expensive failure. Just a couple more M/S they would have been at orbit velocity. Ouch

  • @ti994apc
    @ti994apc Год назад +40

    Don't stop learning and improving. You have already made it this far. A few more kinks to workout and you will have a great product.

  • @jamescondron8266
    @jamescondron8266 Год назад

    Well that’s an expensive lesson to learn, but hopefully everything will be reviewed and they will be able to correct the problem.

  • @Yusuke_Denton
    @Yusuke_Denton Год назад +2

    Great launch guys. At least we got some amazing views. Space is hard. I'm sure you can analyze the data from this and put it towards making the next launch perfect.

  • @jasonr704
    @jasonr704 Год назад +19

    This bodes well for Space X receiving even more contracts I would imagine.

    • @kipa_chu
      @kipa_chu Год назад

      Not spaceX but ISRO lol

  • @BeachriderUSA
    @BeachriderUSA Год назад +18

    The satellites were $4 Mn each, there were 2. They had a very specific orbit-need and time-need. The launcher arranges payload insurance, but NASA certainly loses time (and insurance goes up). You just cannot use $60 Mn rockets to launch these payloads. Astra needs to improve, but there are already other small rocket launchers (Northrup bought one, SpaceX Falcon 1 used to do this work). It is a matter of scaling cost to risk.

  • @yehimstone5492
    @yehimstone5492 Год назад +22

    This just proves how far ahead space-x is

    • @rellik8746
      @rellik8746 Год назад

      all these companies do is steal from taxpayers and start their own civilization on these other continents they don't tell us about. NASA was started by a Nazi scientist. Loot at Hitlers maps of forbidden continents

  • @Zerpentsa6598
    @Zerpentsa6598 Год назад +3

    Enjoyed that moment when all went quiet.

  • @willpulera7303
    @willpulera7303 Год назад +8

    Hard work pays off and if you end up failing you learn from any mistakes and try again. The simple fact that you are transporting payloads into space is a phenomenal success so go back to the drawing board to find out what went wrong and correct those mistakes so they don't happen again in the future. Great job.

    • @smevox7490
      @smevox7490 Год назад +1

      No, that isn't how this works, companies are not going to rely on you if you fail. They will go with proven providers. As they should. This is extremely sad as we need more competition to drive innovation, but you can't have a failure like this occur.

    • @bajamike9276
      @bajamike9276 Год назад

      No, hard work pays off down the road, Laziness pays off Now!

    • @craftpaint1644
      @craftpaint1644 Год назад

      They just lost satellites 😐

  • @jaseastroboy9240
    @jaseastroboy9240 Год назад +20

    It is a bit sad that it was just a quick, it failed, thanks for watching. They could have stuck with the broadcast, show the staff, show a presenter who would describe what has happened or not happened. Explain what the procedure is for this eventuality. What group takes over now to investigate, do they try for a controlled re-entry burn up or is it stuck in low orbit for months or years. I don't expect them to have all the answers but to just say, that didn't work, see ya, was a bit disappointing. After all, how we handle failure is just as important as how we handle success. Now all we will hear for quite some time is reporters filling the silence with their opinions, conjecture and guesses. Surely there are plans in place for this sort of thing. A failure will bring more public attention than a success so there is an opportunity to present a calm, informed and informative viewpoint. If it is just left to reporters to fill in the silence then the situation may not be painted in the best light.

    • @JESUSCHRIST-ONLYWAYTOHEAVEN
      @JESUSCHRIST-ONLYWAYTOHEAVEN Год назад

      WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR NOT YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE HIM ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND HE WILL GO THROUGH EVERY WORD YOU SAID/EVERY THOUGHT YOU HAD/EVERY SIN YOU DID. YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ARGUE WITH HIM EITHER, YOU WILL KNOW YOU ARE GUILTY AND MADE A BIG MISTAKE. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO TURN TO JESUS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. YOURE EITHER FOR GOD OR AGAINST GOD AND THERE IS BUT 1 GOD (its not satan/buddha/allah). PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE BELOW AND IF YOU WANT TO MOCK AFTER GO FOR IT BUT I PLEAD WITH YOU TO READ IT. I WILL PRAY FOR YOU
      GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS!
      MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RUclips STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE!
      JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU!
      Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6
      "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33
      “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

    • @littlebear7018
      @littlebear7018 Год назад +1

      Totally agree with your assessment; I was viewing the launch and can't describe the letdown I had experienced.

    • @andyharpist2938
      @andyharpist2938 Год назад +2

      It left me feeling that this was almost a declaration of power over me... and when it went wrong then the discussion was curtailed. I did not feel a part of this at all.

    • @nerfherder5211
      @nerfherder5211 Год назад

      They did tell us what happened and will likely collect logs and try to get a more precise cause so that the risk for a similar problem can be reduced for future missions. Speculating further can be left to mainstream media who are experts at this sort of thing. NASA will, as usual, give a little bit more details later at a press conference but some of it is for internal specs only. This is normal and seems rational.

    • @jaseastroboy9240
      @jaseastroboy9240 Год назад

      @@nerfherder5211 I totally understand that they will not have all the answers 1 minute after the failure. That process takes a long time to work out root cause if it is even possible. What I am saying is that they could have stayed with the viewers and given them some explanation of what will happen next, what their standard process is in the event of a failure. Basically there was a reasonable chance of failure and so having a plan in place that was better than, it failed, thanks for watching, would have been nice.
      If a major sporting event ended on a contentious umpire call or if there was an injury in the final seconds. I am sure the commentators wouldn't just say "wow, that's bad, thanks for watching" and switch off the coverage. They would replay what they had, they would talk about the rules, what was done the last time this happened, what the options are, etc. When you have a captivated audience you make the best use of that, you don't just throw it away and hope that the media paints a favourable picture.

  • @brianblasius
    @brianblasius Год назад +3

    Astra is a young company and it's learning a lot from this failures. They will make it, they came from far. All the best team Astra!

    • @hope5480
      @hope5480 Год назад +1

      Yes...

    • @brianblasius
      @brianblasius Год назад

      @DontWorryDiaperJoeGotYouCovered The "mode" of failure was different. Which means they solved the previous issues.

  • @FC-cz6zd
    @FC-cz6zd Год назад +1

    Always a tough thing to see. Hope they can bounce back!

  • @heep34987yt
    @heep34987yt Год назад +35

    They should buy some SpaceX rockets and put Astra stickers on them.

    • @mtx33
      @mtx33 Год назад +2

      It might sounds funny, but i can imagine in the future there will be OEM rocket manufacturers and a lot of small integrators only rebadging the same products. It's industry standard in aviation to buy a plane and brand it to your airline. Maybe in the future there will be more launch providers using spacex or astra rockets to launch satellites for cheap.

    • @claudew5582
      @claudew5582 Год назад +1

      😂 I was thinking of the same thing.

    • @edwardmatthews5899
      @edwardmatthews5899 Год назад

      Nah they’re to proud to do that and rather waste more taxpayers money on dead ends,fire them all.

  • @lordcraycray2921
    @lordcraycray2921 Год назад +19

    F in the chat for the NASA and Astra. Hopefully you can keep at it. You were close!

    • @oldschoolman1444
      @oldschoolman1444 Год назад

      Close only counts in horse shoes and handgrnads. =)

    • @Kharnellius
      @Kharnellius Год назад +1

      Unless spelling is involved.

  • @bbgcars
    @bbgcars Год назад

    ALWAYS ROOTING FOR THE UNDERDOG....CMON ASTRA! Were pulling for you and hope you succeed in the next one and the future!

  • @putt7515
    @putt7515 Год назад +2

    He really said thank you astra for the live stream

  • @HowToSpacic
    @HowToSpacic Год назад +61

    Argh they were so close! Astra can't catch a break
    Upper stage failed approx. 70 seconds early with a max speed of 6575 m/s which is just infuriatingly close to orbit. There was a big cloud, presumably unburned propellant, which is never a great sign. Perhaps the turbopump thought it was on an Antares and failed or there was a fuel/ox supply issue. Props to Astra for the transparency and straight up telling everyone that the payload didn't get into orbit.
    I’m not a scientist, Astra surely will figure out what did wrong just putting out some theories from my civilian perspective.
    RIP LV10, better luck next time Astra!

    • @SilverSergeant
      @SilverSergeant Год назад +2

      It is their fault......inferior engineering....

    • @iandonnelly959
      @iandonnelly959 Год назад +2

      There's no turbopump on the second stage, it's a pressure fed engine.

    • @dmurray2978
      @dmurray2978 Год назад +8

      Maybe they need to wear more covid masks or fly a bigger rainbow flag

    • @HowToSpacic
      @HowToSpacic Год назад +2

      @@dmurray2978 what the hell are you on about lmao

    • @HowToSpacic
      @HowToSpacic Год назад +2

      @@iandonnelly959 oh thanks

  • @thomasbarrett3175
    @thomasbarrett3175 Год назад +17

    Mission Control looks more like an H&R Block in some 50 year old strip mall.

  • @velez910
    @velez910 Год назад +11

    Stay strong guys if your given another chance. Don't dwell I feel like after the first failure the team has suffered. Remember failure happens learn from it. Have confidence guys you can do this. Don't give up. Waiting to hear what happened. It might be time for a few dumb loads

  • @hernandovillamarinbuenaven7476
    @hernandovillamarinbuenaven7476 Год назад +1

    Deepest respects with ALL of you / Corageous Team. 'Failure' is actually a WIN. It only makes you stronger, wiser, even more creative!!. 💪🇺🇲

  • @encinobalboa
    @encinobalboa Год назад +12

    Multiple count down holds for this launch indicated problem. Should have scrubbed and triple checked everything.

  • @Jayf1981
    @Jayf1981 Год назад +24

    Poor thing looked like she wanted to cry and who could blame her? Good effort Astra! NASA we love you in Georgia!

    • @mikel4690
      @mikel4690 Год назад +1

      No it ain't - tax money flushed down the toilet.

    • @Kelnx
      @Kelnx Год назад

      @@mikel4690 I'd rather have my tax dollars wasted on blowing up rockets than most of the idiotic wasteful programs it goes to now. At least when a rocket fails you learn something about rockets.

    • @Jayf1981
      @Jayf1981 Год назад

      @@mikel4690 Nah, Just Federal Reserve debt notes, your tax dollars go straight to Vatican Bankers.

    • @jl5392
      @jl5392 Год назад

      This is why diversity hires have no place in the workforce. Let men do the engineering work.

    • @user-lh9fx8zc9p
      @user-lh9fx8zc9p Год назад

      @@liamprincetech ofc lmao

  • @davesradiorepairs6344
    @davesradiorepairs6344 Год назад

    Astra, it was a very good effort... I'm sure you'll learn the cause and overcome it on the next flight.... Best wishes...

  • @MazzifLOL
    @MazzifLOL Год назад +16

    After so many countdown delays, they must of known there was an issue...

  • @Kmykzy
    @Kmykzy Год назад +60

    Daily reminder how hard getting things into orbit really is.

  • @YohXoX
    @YohXoX Год назад +13

    Startups in general have 1 in 10 survivability rate. Startups in rocket industry... oh boy. I hope they manage to pull through!

    • @tc539
      @tc539 Год назад +1

      this company is a waste of taxpayer money.

    • @YohXoX
      @YohXoX Год назад

      @@tc539 I both agree and disagree. Biggest waste of TP money are companies like Boeing and ULA. Only way they can be shook to move their asses or remove them from market completely is to have a lot of alternatives. SpaceX is up there but you need more players with orbital capability in the market.

    • @tc539
      @tc539 Год назад +1

      @@YohXoX true but they are not it

    • @YohXoX
      @YohXoX Год назад

      @@tc539 Hmm are you saying that based on amount of failures they had or something else? Perhaps you know a more than me. To me it seems they lack in hardware experience but are on point with software(Tokyo Drift rocket was amazing showcase of software IMO).

    • @tc539
      @tc539 Год назад +1

      @@YohXoX no im saying they need to pull their heads outta their a ses and stop wasting tax dollars on problems that others have already solved

  • @ArtStoneUS
    @ArtStoneUS Год назад

    There were a lot of qualifiers in the description hinting that they suspected it might fail

  • @SJR_Media_Group
    @SJR_Media_Group Год назад +1

    It's a lot easier to have an unsuccessful launch than successful. The fact most are successful is a direct reflection on entire team making it happen. We learn from our mistakes and strive to get it perfect next time.

    • @oceyho
      @oceyho Год назад

      well with the fail rate the have, I think there is no future for them

    • @SJR_Media_Group
      @SJR_Media_Group Год назад

      @@oceyho Thanks... what's the old saying, try try and finally give up - LOL

  • @garyrogers3237
    @garyrogers3237 Год назад +3

    No success is ever found without a few setbacks. Keep reaching for the 🌟🌟⭐️⭐️

  • @techtinkerin
    @techtinkerin Год назад +19

    No one ever said these things were easy! 😎👍❤️

    • @stickytourbus
      @stickytourbus Год назад +1

      *Elon.*

    • @armorer94
      @armorer94 Год назад +2

      You know what's easy? Glib, vacuous comments on the internet.

    • @MAGGOT_VOMIT
      @MAGGOT_VOMIT Год назад

      Pimpin' just got moved up a rung on the Easy Ladder. {0.o}

    • @Kharnellius
      @Kharnellius Год назад

      And? They spent a ton more money too and it had to succeed.

    • @blobman1238
      @blobman1238 Год назад

      @@stickytourbus He didn't say it was easy.

  • @sergiomadrid1400
    @sergiomadrid1400 Год назад +1

    No sé rindan amigos, suerte en el próximo lanzamiento

  • @justingross1535
    @justingross1535 Год назад +2

    Is this the same co that lost a payload on an uncontrollable spin like 6 months ago? Maybe longer or less.

  • @knight3131
    @knight3131 Год назад +6

    Im more exited for Astra than I am for Blue origin. They have achieve more than BO has in over 12 years.

    • @dalethelander3781
      @dalethelander3781 Год назад +1

      BO is Jeff Bezos' 1:1 scale Estes rocketry hobby.

    • @MatteoComensoli
      @MatteoComensoli Год назад +1

      sub orbit hop is like the kindergarden for space

    • @marykuchlenz8071
      @marykuchlenz8071 Год назад

      BO is an amusement park ride. They’ve never been to orbit.

    • @ArielGonzalez1
      @ArielGonzalez1 Год назад

      yeah dude. these lads were really close to succeed

    • @JESUSCHRIST-ONLYWAYTOHEAVEN
      @JESUSCHRIST-ONLYWAYTOHEAVEN Год назад

      WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR NOT YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE HIM ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND HE WILL GO THROUGH EVERY WORD YOU SAID/EVERY THOUGHT YOU HAD/EVERY SIN YOU DID. YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ARGUE WITH HIM EITHER, YOU WILL KNOW YOU ARE GUILTY AND MADE A BIG MISTAKE. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO TURN TO JESUS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. YOURE EITHER FOR GOD OR AGAINST GOD AND THERE IS BUT 1 GOD (its not satan/buddha/allah). PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE BELOW AND IF YOU WANT TO MOCK AFTER GO FOR IT BUT I PLEAD WITH YOU TO READ IT. I WILL PRAY FOR YOU
      GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS!
      MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RUclips STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE!
      JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU!
      Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6
      "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33
      “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

  • @rayoflight62
    @rayoflight62 Год назад +3

    By looking at the cloud of unburned propellent around 07:25 , I think one side of the turbopump failed, the the engine shut down, and the rocket begun to tumble.
    The speed of the rocket was very close to the orbital speed of 7,780 m/s but not yet there, so sadly the rocket and payload will burn up in the atmosphere.
    The failure of a turbopump (my personal idea here) is a common occurrence as it is the most critical component of a rocket engine. My opinion is that Astra should endure and troubleshoot the failure and try once more; they get so close to success that would be silly to let it go.
    Auguri of success on your next try!

    • @DSE8991
      @DSE8991 Год назад

      I think second stage’s Aether engine is pressure fed. Sad to see failure anyway.

  • @MrMAC8964
    @MrMAC8964 Год назад +2

    That was Astranomically a bummer .

  • @scottmorgan734
    @scottmorgan734 Год назад +8

    Unfortunately, this stuff can just happen. SpaceX do a great job at making sure stuff like this don’t happen, but they’ve had there fair share of problems along the way. I’m sure this issue can be resolved and make a successful delivery next launch.

    • @jeebusk
      @jeebusk Год назад

      My question would be how honest the company was about the risks, SpaceX was very honest about the risks in the early days.

  • @robwatts3000
    @robwatts3000 Год назад +6

    Give'em time. They have learned.

  • @troyezell5841
    @troyezell5841 Год назад +9

    That's sad, all the hard work everyone involved puts into these projects! No doubt, it is disheartening.

    • @jl5392
      @jl5392 Год назад

      Yeah, but they suck. They're struggling to practice an art that was nearly perfected HALF A CENTURY ago.

    • @roberthensley9071
      @roberthensley9071 Год назад

      @@jl5392 wow thats kinda ignorant! They suck? Really? Factors change… everything from the thickness of the atmosphere to the moister in the air to the position of the planets and the gravitational pull of those planets on this specific day and time need to be calculated. If one thing is off it could cause something to fail. To say they suck or even imply that its in any way perfected is ignorant and id like to see you do better. Don’t cast stones when you live in a glass world… Don’t make it sound easy cause its not. Do your research before you shame scientists on something they worked hard to even get partially right.

  • @JohnWilliams-fy1go
    @JohnWilliams-fy1go Год назад +1

    We love you all and pray for your bright future!

  • @brianressler569
    @brianressler569 Год назад +1

    What a shame I am rooting for Astra, that launch off the pad was beautiful, hope they get it figured out for the next one

    • @zippymax1
      @zippymax1 Год назад

      Where did they land the booster?

    • @brianressler569
      @brianressler569 Год назад

      @@zippymax1 lol this one doesn't land my dude, it's supposed to be cost efficient in its own right but not reusable

    • @zippymax1
      @zippymax1 Год назад

      @@brianressler569 Lame. So 1969.

    • @brianressler569
      @brianressler569 Год назад +1

      @@zippymax1 I'm all for SpaceX and reusability but I don't necessarily rule out companies that aren't doing it yet, these are some talented engineers trying to make a name for themselves in a competitive industry with less resources than the big names out there, I think thats worthy of appreciation even if it is old tech

    • @zippymax1
      @zippymax1 Год назад

      @@brianressler569 As long as NASA doesn't interfere and put a finger on the scale. It's NASA I don't trust. NASA should be completely dismantled except as a negotiation/contracting link between the governnent and private space industry. The government doesn't belong in the rocket-building business. Without Nasa, we would have been where we are now by 2000.
      And that rocket looked and acted suspiciously like an awkward NASA lemon.

  • @nighttow8780
    @nighttow8780 Год назад +15

    Isn't this the second payload delivery failure for Astra?

    • @user-lv7ph7hs7l
      @user-lv7ph7hs7l Год назад +2

      I believe third. DARPA, previous NASA mission and this one. In total 7/9 failures giving them 1/5 success rate.

    • @user-lv7ph7hs7l
      @user-lv7ph7hs7l Год назад +1

      I checked, one space force and two NASA missions lost. DARPA wasn't launched as they missed the timeline.

    • @nighttow8780
      @nighttow8780 Год назад

      @@user-lv7ph7hs7l 👍

  • @polyuniverse1908
    @polyuniverse1908 Год назад +28

    Would be more professional if they continued to comment on what is happening even though it was obvious there was a problem. They will investigate and fix the problem. They seemed so discouraged they had difficulty talking about it. Failures are not uncommon and they need to have the ability to accept that and carry on professionally.

    • @geoffresmart
      @geoffresmart Год назад

      Wait are you saying that nasa doesn’t have the ability to accept failure and carry on? Lol bro, they do the investigation first, decide affirmatively what the problem is, and then comment. Even if what you think you see is obvious, that’s not how investigations work. And it would be ridiculous to comment as they are investigating as the information delivered in piecemeal wouldn’t present the correct picture of what failed.

    • @ajokpaniovojoel1049
      @ajokpaniovojoel1049 Год назад

      They won't comment on American failures

    • @polyuniverse1908
      @polyuniverse1908 Год назад

      @@ajokpaniovojoel1049 they use to be much more professional when failures occurred. Maybe because it was a private company’s vehicle the representative didn’t continue to communicate, I’m not sure. If go back and watch some of the big NASA failures like the Space Shuttle Challenger failure where astronauts died, they continued to talk even after it became obvious there was catastrophic failure.

  • @anuradhapriyankara5226
    @anuradhapriyankara5226 Год назад

    7:53 If you turn on CC you can see someone says, "Hey Michael, they would like to cut back to the announcer". That's the first sign of something went wrong I think ( for us, the general audience ).

  • @Fight4aCure
    @Fight4aCure Год назад

    so the audio cuts out at the most important part?

  • @Jandredlr
    @Jandredlr Год назад +6

    Well done Astra team! You've come a long way and the future is bright :)

    • @stanweatherfield681
      @stanweatherfield681 Год назад +3

      Lol

    • @ozgott1415
      @ozgott1415 Год назад +1

      @@stanweatherfield681 everyone gets a trophy

    • @stanweatherfield681
      @stanweatherfield681 Год назад +3

      @@ozgott1415 of course! silly me, I forgot that now we applaud failure in America..

    • @Jandredlr
      @Jandredlr Год назад

      ​@@stanweatherfield681 They have come a long way thanks to failures and learning from them. Be happy and positive for them my guy, Not everyone can be a SpaceX but they case sure as hell help make space more accessible. If rocket companies were easy there would be no shortage of them...

  • @rafaeltorovip
    @rafaeltorovip Год назад +10

    Although I understand the disappointment after failing on a mission, I will appreciate a less rushed ending of the webcast when things go wrong. I we spent time waiting and watching the launch, you should at least spend some time with your supporters. It is easy to celebrate accomplishments, but all of this rocket companies are so timid sharing information about failures. Good luck next time. 👍

    • @themaestro5946
      @themaestro5946 Год назад +1

      That’s about a 9 on the tension scale Rafael toro. Relax.

    • @TheJacklwilliams
      @TheJacklwilliams Год назад +2

      You are a bystander, they share this, by choice. They are a business, striving to succeed. Their purpose is not to entertain you nor are they bound to provide you with an experience you deem “fitting”. RE timid? That’s not information the public has a right to nor would any SANE person expect them to divulge it. Re what you appreciate? No one cares what you appreciate. That’s not the purpose of the effort nor the live stream.

    • @CharlesAnsman
      @CharlesAnsman Год назад +4

      If tax payers money was used in anyway for this launch, then yes we deserve all video and information

    • @dalethelander3781
      @dalethelander3781 Год назад +2

      Upper management probably ordered the stream stopped. They just wanted to get the hell out of there.

    • @rafaeltorovip
      @rafaeltorovip Год назад

      @@TheJacklwilliams Wow my friend, you are suffering a serious case of either stress or anxiety that needs immediate care. Calm down, relax. I appreciate your thoughtful remarks. 😃

  • @jennyohara4011
    @jennyohara4011 Год назад

    Why cut off sound when things go wrong?

  • @felixdteam
    @felixdteam Год назад +2

    I wonder why the second stage started turning out of control after the engine shutdown

  • @captainclute6889
    @captainclute6889 Год назад +39

    Very sad, I’m not sure how many more they can endure 😣. Never like to see a space mission fail.

    • @RedKnight.
      @RedKnight. Год назад

      SpaceX was the same way in the beginning

    • @reefhound9902
      @reefhound9902 Год назад +4

      @@RedKnight. No it wasn't. SpaceX has a 94% success launch rate and most of the failures have been on the booster stage return.

    • @honorguardsfencingclub7322
      @honorguardsfencingclub7322 Год назад +1

      No sane person wants to see expensive failures, but rocketry has always been a risky and expensive undertaking. Modern telemetry will pinpoint the cause, and smart people will make sure the next bird flies right.

    • @idontknowanygoodnames1498
      @idontknowanygoodnames1498 Год назад

      @@reefhound9902 94% now but the first couple launches of the falcon 1 didn't succeed

    • @idontknowanygoodnames1498
      @idontknowanygoodnames1498 Год назад +4

      @@bcrox I guess you don't want GPS weather data satellite images or good maps then. Because satellites fall back to earth and we need rockets to take them back up, and when companies are making cheaper and cheaper rockets it allows companies to make better satellite technology. It's allowing global internet constellations to be put up.

  • @robb4357
    @robb4357 Год назад +7

    Spacex makes it look so damn easy

    • @azjatyckieklimaty2172
      @azjatyckieklimaty2172 Год назад

      so does Rocket Lab :)

    • @woolymittens
      @woolymittens Год назад +2

      @@azjatyckieklimaty2172 who? 🤣

    • @srrich27
      @srrich27 Год назад +1

      @@woolymittens The people sending NASA's Capstone satellite to the moon in preparation for their Lunar Gateway project. They're a US company launching out of New Zealand. Electron is pretty cool, if only a small-sat launcher. Neutron should be pretty interesting, if it goes according to plan.

    • @azjatyckieklimaty2172
      @azjatyckieklimaty2172 Год назад

      @@woolymittens seems you're pretty ignorant lol, that's weird cuz RKLB has achieved far more than Astra.

  • @mrzorg
    @mrzorg Год назад

    What's the flash from behind the vehicle @6:25 Near the top of the screen? Anyone else see it? Impact with something @6:30? @7:30 suddenly it twisted? Did it impact, or a fuel tank rupture?

  • @pinoyguitartv
    @pinoyguitartv Год назад

    GO ASTRA!!! I know you can recover from this, and eventually will succeed.
    God speed👍

  • @anonymoussoul3343
    @anonymoussoul3343 Год назад +21

    Failure is the part of success! Let's cheer them up, it's not the end.

    • @haiderrazazaidi2262
      @haiderrazazaidi2262 Год назад +2

      Very true I endorse your view, but if it were Russia, China or India all the west would have ridiculed. I think there is no success without fear of failure.

    • @desertodavid
      @desertodavid Год назад

      Screw these people. They still want us to think that these silly paper face mask work to stop viruses.

  • @duradim1
    @duradim1 Год назад +4

    They owned up to it pretty quick.

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban Год назад +1

      Couldn’t really hide it. And then say bye quickly.

    • @duradim1
      @duradim1 Год назад +1

      @@TheBooban Most of the time they say "We lost contact and will update you later."

  • @ToriKo_
    @ToriKo_ Год назад +2

    Wow this has such a heartbreaking atmosphere

    • @Slapwapy
      @Slapwapy Год назад

      Imagine how the rocket must have felt.

  • @rush1er
    @rush1er Год назад

    I'm a tile man and my favorite saying for when there's a problem with no immediate solution is " Let's figure this out bcuz it ain't Rocket Surgery!"
    This is what I was talking about.

  • @Nostradamus_Order33
    @Nostradamus_Order33 Год назад +3

    At four minutes, everything is fine.
    Engine did not light.
    At five minutes, everything is fine.
    Engine still not on.
    Then we hear crickets 🦗 crickets 🦗

    • @TheRustedShackleford
      @TheRustedShackleford Год назад

      The engine was on. You just can't see the plume. The engine seemed to flame out and the vectoring went nuts right as the velocity started dropping.
      Was a strange malfunction that sent the craft spinning.

  • @mjw907
    @mjw907 Год назад +4

    Nice try. Hopefully the next one works they really need to get a successful mission.

  • @spencerwilson3298
    @spencerwilson3298 Год назад

    The launch may have been a failure but the views were still stunning. Learn from the mistakes this time and better luck next time.

  • @starmanhov
    @starmanhov Год назад

    They still managed to get some incredible views just before it went out of control. Earth is so blue

  • @dust1209
    @dust1209 Год назад +5

    Space is hard! Astra has what it takes, keep going team!

    • @jl5392
      @jl5392 Год назад +1

      Maybe they can get a participation trophy.

  • @yamatowolfgang7960
    @yamatowolfgang7960 Год назад +3

    4:46 the most underwhelming control room shot

  • @falconvisionuav
    @falconvisionuav Год назад

    Was it a computational error or mechanical problem?

  • @himssendol6512
    @himssendol6512 Год назад +1

    Did the second stage run out of fuel?

  • @mlee1308
    @mlee1308 Год назад +16

    Should have had space x send it up.

  • @richardbillin5190
    @richardbillin5190 Год назад +32

    That’s a shame hopefully it isn’t because of the price of fuel….I know I can’t afford to fill my car anymore

    • @ablewindsor1459
      @ablewindsor1459 Год назад +1

      Is Not Biden the Great just so so so so so so

    • @emmanuelpalecpec9025
      @emmanuelpalecpec9025 Год назад +2

      @@ablewindsor1459 bruh Russia started the war. Even if US supplied everyone with oil, everyone would experience high price no matter what

    • @sebassanchezc-1379
      @sebassanchezc-1379 Год назад +2

      Trans kedz need your money for transitions

    • @ablewindsor1459
      @ablewindsor1459 Год назад

      @@emmanuelpalecpec9025 Bro under Trump NO War in Europe...
      Gasoline $1.79 a gallon.
      December Before Putin In invaded gas at $3.50.
      Biden's New Green Deal Energy Policy had Already ready pushed Energy back to new Highs!
      Under Trump45 America became Energy Independent for the FIRST Time since 1970 !!!
      Biden ticks off Saudis then tries to BEG them for more OIL, Begs Venezuela for oil, and wants IRAN who hates the Great Satan to start selling the USA Oil.
      US production down two million barrels a day of crude.
      Allllll Haillll Biden !!!!

    • @emmanuelpalecpec9025
      @emmanuelpalecpec9025 Год назад +1

      @@ablewindsor1459 America doesn't want to use it's oil because they've gone to conserve mode.

  • @themikeymikechannel2947
    @themikeymikechannel2947 Год назад

    Where is it now???? And can we see it floating in space?? THKS

  • @poxcr
    @poxcr Год назад +2

    Wow, that's a tough one to swallow! I'm sorry for the teams involved. Are these payloads insured somehow? The lost satellites were part of a $30 million mission...

    • @JESUSCHRIST-ONLYWAYTOHEAVEN
      @JESUSCHRIST-ONLYWAYTOHEAVEN Год назад

      WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN GOD OR NOT YOU WILL KNEEL BEFORE HIM ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND HE WILL GO THROUGH EVERY WORD YOU SAID/EVERY THOUGHT YOU HAD/EVERY SIN YOU DID. YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ARGUE WITH HIM EITHER, YOU WILL KNOW YOU ARE GUILTY AND MADE A BIG MISTAKE. THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO TURN TO JESUS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. YOURE EITHER FOR GOD OR AGAINST GOD AND THERE IS BUT 1 GOD (its not satan/buddha/allah). PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE BELOW AND IF YOU WANT TO MOCK AFTER GO FOR IT BUT I PLEAD WITH YOU TO READ IT. I WILL PRAY FOR YOU
      GOD'S STANDARD FOR HEAVEN IS PERFECTION AND ONLY JESUS (THE SON OF GOD/GOD IN THE FLESH) LIVED THAT PERFECT LIFE! HE LAID DOWN HIS LIFE & TOOK THE WRATH OF THE FATHER ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS! GOD IS JUST SO HE MUST PUNISH SIN & HE IS HOLY SO NO SIN CAN ENTER HIS KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. IF YOU ARE IN CHRIST ON JUDGEMENT DAY GOD WILL SEE YOU AS HIS PERFECT SON (SINLESS SINCE YOUR SINS ARE COVERED BY JESUS' OFFERING). YOU CAN ALSO CHOOSE TO REJECT JESUS' GIFT/SACRIFICE & PAY FOR YOUR OWN SIN WITH DEATH (HELL) BUT THAT SEEMS PRETTY FOOLISH! GOD SEES & HEARS EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID & DONE. YOU WONT WIN AN ARGUMENT WITH HIM & YOU CANT DEFEND ANY OF YOUR SINS TO HIM. YOU'RE NOT A GOOD PERSON, I'M NOT A GOOD PERSON... ONLY GOD IS GOOD! WE'RE ALL GUILTY WITHOUT ACCEPTING JESUS' SACRIFICE FOR OUR SINS!
      MUHAMMAD DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, BUDDHA DIDN'T DIE FOR YOUR SINS, NO PASTOR/NO PRIEST/NO SAINT/NO ANCESTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, MARY DIDN'T, THE POPE DIDN'T EITHER, NO IDOLS OR FALSE gods DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO MUSICIAN OR CELEBRITY DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO INFLUENCER OR RUclips STAR DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO SCIENTIST OR POLITICIAN DIED FOR YOUR SINS, NO ATHLETE OR ACTOR DIED FOR YOUR SINS! STOP IDOLIZING & WORSHIPING THESE PEOPLE!
      JESUS CHRIST ALONE DIED FOR YOUR SINS & WAS RESURRECTED FROM THE GRAVE! HE IS ALIVE & COMING BACK VERY VERY SOON WITH JUDGEMENT (THESE ARE END TIMES)! PREPARE YOURSELVES, TURN FROM SIN & RUN TO JESUS! HE KNOWS YOUR PAIN & TROUBLES, HE WANTS TO HEAL & RESTORE YOU! TALK TO HIM LIKE A BEST FRIEND! ASK HIM TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO YOU & HELP YOU TO BELIEVE IF YOU DOUBT! DON'T WAIT TO CRY OUT! NO ONE IS PROMISED TOMORROW! HE LONGS FOR YOU TO INVITE HIM IN, HE LOVES YOU MORE THAN ANY PERSON EVER COULD, HE CREATED YOU!
      Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."-John 14:6
      "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven."-Matthew 10:33
      “For the wages of sin is death (hell), but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord”-Romans 6:23

  • @drew4021
    @drew4021 Год назад +13

    Rocket science is hard. Makes us appreciate even more what SpaceX was able to accomplish. Still I would like to see at least one other company succeed.

    • @drury2d8
      @drury2d8 Год назад +1

      Spacex was simple, poach NASA talent and acquire private funding...

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban Год назад

      Not enough credit is given to the engineer behind Falcon 9. If Bezos, Astra, Boeing, or anyone had that engineer, we would be talking about them instead of SpaceX.

    • @Chris-bg8mk
      @Chris-bg8mk Год назад +3

      @@TheBooban Really? One engineer? 🤣😅

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban Год назад

      @@Chris-bg8mk yeah. His design. Look it up.

  • @cccheezy
    @cccheezy Год назад +17

    sad to see. it just shows how hard this stuff really is

    • @tc539
      @tc539 Год назад +1

      its not as hard as they are making it look SPACE X is doing great even better than nasa

    • @cccheezy
      @cccheezy Год назад

      @@tc539nah rockets are hard u should try

    • @tc539
      @tc539 Год назад +1

      @@cccheezy no thanks i do what im good at. they should really find what they are good at and go do it instead of wasting tax dollars doing what they are not good at

  • @kurtspringer4071
    @kurtspringer4071 Год назад

    Just a quick ❓ how much does it cost per mission

  • @briangarcia4496
    @briangarcia4496 Год назад +1

    This is so many understanding that rocketing is not easy as SpaceX make it look. Good Luck on the next one!

    • @reefhound9902
      @reefhound9902 Год назад

      Nobody said it is easy but these guys clearly can't handle hard.

  • @hj-redravenheng3822
    @hj-redravenheng3822 Год назад +3

    Rocketry is hard - well done on a successful first-stage burn and separation. Best of luck with the next launch!

  • @robertcringely7348
    @robertcringely7348 Год назад +7

    Let's be clear: they ran out of fuel. This is a rocket that is supposed to be able to launch up to 150 kg and they ran out of fuel putting a pair of 5.34 kg satellites into orbit. 10.68 kg is about EIGHT PERCENT of their supposed max payload. This is not the first time Astra has run out of fuel on a launch, either, which is why this rocket had both stages lengthened specifically to add more fuel, yet STILL it wasn't enough. How could they not have known that? Who decided to take this ridiculous (and completely calculable) risk?
    If Astra was a baseball team it would be time to fire the manager.

    • @oldmanfunky4909
      @oldmanfunky4909 Год назад +1

      Common core math. They didn't count enough boxes.

  • @LilStevie369
    @LilStevie369 Год назад

    Oh wow, that really hurts. I know you'll figure it oot but still... Next time guys. We will be watching and hoping. But it was a beautiful launch.

  • @zippymax1
    @zippymax1 Год назад +1

    Where did they land the booster?