Working on a Fiction-Based Aircraft as a Smithsonian Museum Specialist

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 июн 2024
  • What's it like working on a fictional aircraft when you're used to the real thing? National Air and Space museum specialist Matthew Voight explains to Adam Savage, identifies some of its real-world elements, then describes how he and his team plan to hang the Smithsonian's X-Wing without drastically altering its structure.
    Why There's an X-Wing in the Smithsonian: • Why There's an X-Wing ...
    Shot and edited by Joey Fameli
    Produced by Kristen Lomasney
    Join this channel to support Tested and get access to perks:
    / @tested
    Tested Ts, stickers, mugs and more: tested-store.com
    Subscribe for more videos (and click the bell for notifications): ruclips.net/user/subscription_c...
    Twitter: / testedcom
    Facebook: / testedcom
    Instagram: / testedcom
    Discord: / discord
    Amazon Storefront: www.amazon.com/shop/adamsavage...
    Savage Industries T-shirts: cottonbureau.com/stores/savag...
    Tested is:
    Adam Savage / donttrythis
    Norman Chan / nchan
    Joey Fameli www.joeyfameli.com
    Gunther Kirsch guntherkirsch.com
    Ryan Kiser / ryan.kiser
    Jen Schachter www.jenschachter.com
    Kishore Hari / sciencequiche
    Sean Charlesworth / cworthdynamics
    Jeremy Williams / jerware
    Kayte Sabicer / kaytesabicer
    Bill Doran / chinbeard
    Ariel Waldman / arielwaldman
    Darrell Maloney / brokennerd
    Kristen Lomasney / krystynlo
    Intro bumper by Abe Dieckman
    Thanks for watching!
    #AdamSavage #Smithsonian #XWing
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 357

  • @tested
    @tested  2 года назад +32

    Why There's an X-Wing in the Smithsonian: ruclips.net/video/CZojRDHNggI/видео.html
    More Smithsonian videos here: ruclips.net/p/PLJtitKU0CAeiJ7tjkIqcrRPfIYZHPW643

    • @dan64740
      @dan64740 2 года назад +1

      @Wagner Leite and it’s people like you that will be the ruin of the world open your eyes and grow up

    • @GreatNorthenCreations
      @GreatNorthenCreations 2 года назад +1

      Does the wings open up?? Are displaying with wings closed?

    • @GeneralPadron
      @GeneralPadron 2 года назад

      Not an aircraft

    • @GeneralPadron
      @GeneralPadron 2 года назад

      Not an aircraft

  • @vyt
    @vyt 2 года назад +51

    these vids never cease to amaze me

  • @tahl112
    @tahl112 2 года назад +46

    A little comment section message in a bottle for you Ghibli heads out there: the dark blue seaplane in the background of a few shots is THE plane that Curtis' plane is based on in Porco Rosso.

  • @coeusdarksoul2855
    @coeusdarksoul2855 2 года назад +62

    Dude, that thing looks like it's ready for someone jump in and take off right now... those artists & model makers that worked on it did an absolutely incredible & amazing job! :D

  • @scottstewart3884
    @scottstewart3884 2 года назад +25

    Imagine being those Ladies crawling inside the X-wing, 50 years from now telling their Grandkids about Helping to restore it from the inside out.....

  • @threaseabaysinger5017
    @threaseabaysinger5017 2 года назад +24

    My brother Matt. So proud!

    • @tested
      @tested  2 года назад +14

      He is an excellent and informative speaker! We appreciated his time.

    • @FMFvideos
      @FMFvideos 2 года назад +1

      * Our brother

  • @Russellsperry
    @Russellsperry 2 года назад +22

    I could look at that X-Wing all day, but the dream would be to sit in the cockpit, and relive a childhood fantasy! Now I must immediately see if I can find pictures or video of it to stop my curiosity from driving me nuts.

    • @BinkSayres
      @BinkSayres 2 года назад +3

      Squadons in VR

    • @Russellsperry
      @Russellsperry 2 года назад +1

      @@BinkSayres thanks, I’ll check it out 👍

  • @jamesbarisitz4794
    @jamesbarisitz4794 2 года назад +35

    Every time I see the X wing on the screen, it brings a smile to my face. Can't wait to see it suspended in its spot.

  • @emilyrobinson6080
    @emilyrobinson6080 2 года назад +4

    I love this sort of content because i often ponder to myself what someone whose based in more real world applications would think when interacting with pieces intended for a totally different universe

  • @dynamite1049
    @dynamite1049 2 года назад +9

    Wow. Adam asks’ the most interesting and amazingly worded questions. I love X-wings and Star Wars, but Adam Savage is just incredible

  • @millenniumf1138
    @millenniumf1138 2 года назад +66

    "This was built 20 years ago" Well, no, not really. This is Poe's X-wing from Episode 9, which you can tell by the orange and white paint scheme. Even if it's the same prop from Episode 7, that's still only six or seven years.

    • @Yora21
      @Yora21 2 года назад +1

      What a travesty.

    • @tomtheutdsupporter
      @tomtheutdsupporter 2 года назад +8

      Yer it's a T-70, different engines to the 65

    • @Tojeaux_
      @Tojeaux_ 2 года назад +8

      it could have been built 20 years ago, if they took one of their old X-wings and gave it a new paint job.

    • @davidjacobs8558
      @davidjacobs8558 2 года назад +9

      @@Tojeaux_ they are of completely different designs, and don't share any parts.

    • @millenniumf1138
      @millenniumf1138 2 года назад +9

      @@Tojeaux_ The problem with that is that the T-70 X-wing wasn't even designed 20 years ago, much less built as a full size prop. That would mean it was built for Episode 2: Attack of the Clones, which had no X-wings in it, much less the T-70 model from The Force Awakens.

  • @s13nate
    @s13nate 2 года назад

    So glad to see more of this

  • @MacNifty
    @MacNifty 2 года назад +6

    I like how they have motors taken apart for the thrust caps.

  • @theepicurean8253
    @theepicurean8253 2 года назад +7

    Love your videos so much! Very educational and fun.

  • @JeffersonSeriously
    @JeffersonSeriously 2 года назад +17

    So I'm trying to figure out the time line for this and maybe I've missed something: This looks like a T-70 X-Wing which was made for the new Star Wars films. However, they mention this was built 20 years ago. Did they really start production on those props 20 years ago? Was that section of the craft a full duplication of an older ship? Or was the person in the video getting confused about when parts of this were made?
    Thanks!

    • @fritzk3627
      @fritzk3627 2 года назад +7

      He was confused. I’m sure Adam squared him away, afterwards…. This one is from 2015.

    • @pala1742
      @pala1742 2 года назад +7

      I assume that they talk about the Parts that were used to build the x-wing to be 20 years old, not the x-wing itself.

    • @bummer6
      @bummer6 2 года назад +5

      @@pala1742 Eh... Unlikely. His exact words were "this was built 20 years ago when they weren't so hard to find". He probably just misspoke or got confused in the moment. Spouting information like this with a camera and microphone recording you can throw you off if you're not used to that kind of thing, so it's not that surprising.

    • @fredericlepeltier3435
      @fredericlepeltier3435 2 года назад +1

      They were talking about the spare parts used as greeblees on that back panel.
      Some of those, manufactured 20, 30 or 40 where easy and cheap to find back then, like the photografic flash handle/ light saber Adam mentionned, but not anymore and today they are worth their weight in gold!
      As Adam mentioned they came from an aviation salvage yard where hollywood prods get all that sort of things (there must be a video somewhere on YT about that) which is also some of the only sources were someone restoring a warbirds can find the part he is missing.

    • @alalalala57
      @alalalala57 2 года назад

      @@bummer6 I think he's talking about the parts, built 20 years ago.

  • @MrBadgas
    @MrBadgas 2 года назад +6

    That was great fun! Thank you.

  • @GenXToysGeek
    @GenXToysGeek 2 года назад +31

    great that an X-Wing made it, just wished it was the T-65B not the T-70.......

    • @Bedgie01
      @Bedgie01 2 года назад +8

      Im for the original X wing to be on display not this one, but
      The House of Mouse wouldn't of allowed it being the control freaks they are, they want to advertise their own crap and recoup some of the damage done for their abysmal movies produced by Jar Jar Abrams and Ruin Johnston with special K at the helm.

    • @Beer_Dad1975
      @Beer_Dad1975 2 года назад +2

      What I don't get is why he said this was built 20 years ago? The film came out in 2015? Can someone explain?

    • @maddocmiller6475
      @maddocmiller6475 2 года назад +3

      @@Beer_Dad1975 Seems like a small mistake OR he thinks it's the original X-Wing. 😀

    • @Beer_Dad1975
      @Beer_Dad1975 2 года назад +1

      @@maddocmiller6475 Thanks, yeah I think he meant to say 10 years maybe? Given it would have had to have been built at least a couple of years before the film came out that might make sense.

    • @maddocmiller6475
      @maddocmiller6475 2 года назад +1

      @@Beer_Dad1975 Yes something like this. But it doesn't matter, the guy has a giant friggin' X-Wing at his workplace and we don't. 😢

  • @jasons5632
    @jasons5632 2 года назад +14

    Well seeing these close up shots of the rear assembly, they're apparently are Phillips head screws in the Star Wars universe ;) There's several on here.e

    • @thirdeyenz
      @thirdeyenz 2 года назад

      They are also visible on Rey's staff.

  • @520azdc
    @520azdc 2 года назад +10

    I'm an old-school SW fan with a deep nostalgia for Luke's T-65 X-Wing but I have to say Poe's Episode 9 T-70 is one of the best looking fictional spacecraft ever made.

    • @patflat456
      @patflat456 2 года назад +2

      I know starwars pretty well... but who the heck is Poe?

    • @520azdc
      @520azdc 2 года назад

      @@patflat456 he's one of the lead characters of the sequel trilogy.

    • @patflat456
      @patflat456 2 года назад +5

      @@520azdc Oh, that's NOT Star wars... I guess that's why I've never heard of him.

    • @520azdc
      @520azdc 2 года назад +4

      @@patflat456 "gRuMbLe GrUmBLE tHaTs NoT sTaR wArS" Lemme guess, you have green fur and live in a garbage can?

    • @patflat456
      @patflat456 2 года назад +4

      @@520azdc Nope. A two bedroom raised ranch.

  • @mikaeelmayet4211
    @mikaeelmayet4211 2 года назад +8

    Truly living my dream

  • @kilroy987
    @kilroy987 2 года назад +20

    1:23 I see hex screws.
    I bet a hydrospanner can't tighten those.
    1:40 "But this was built 20 years ago" wait what? Force Awakens is 6 years old, guys.

    • @scottstark5528
      @scottstark5528 2 года назад +7

      That caught my attention immediately. It is definitely a model from the sequel trilogy which means it couldn't be more than nine years old maximum if it was was one of the first completed models used for filming.

    • @RennyChuggs
      @RennyChuggs 2 года назад

      @@scottstark5528 is it possibly a modification of one of the originals? I'm not super familiar with the ships in starwars

    • @scottstark5528
      @scottstark5528 2 года назад +1

      @@RennyChuggs It is a T70 model used in the sequel trilogy and not T65 model used in the original trilogy. Just look at the engines on the wings as the first tell, also the paint scheme is another tell. If they were doing a modification/ hybrid design then it wouldn't have any business being in the Smithsonian. You can do a google picture search of an Incom T65 X-wing and a Incom T 70 X-wing and clearly see the differences.

    • @Suthriel
      @Suthriel 2 года назад

      @@RennyChuggs Nope, just look at the engine intakes at the frontside of the wings. The original X-Wing had four small intakes, one at each wing (basically four engines, one sitting on each wing), while the newer Resistance X-Wing had those two big intakes, that split right in the center, once the wings open to the X form.
      I really wonder, why they didn´t chose an old original X-Wing (the Incom T-65) for the museum, why a new one?

    • @Bedgie01
      @Bedgie01 2 года назад +3

      I think he was referring to the parts being 20yrs old not the X-wing its self

  • @dee3368
    @dee3368 2 года назад +1

    ... this is freaking amazing

  • @SonnyinPhx
    @SonnyinPhx 2 года назад +7

    While the T-70 is a nice bird...the T-65 will always be my favorite. To steal a line..."An elegant weapon for a more civilized age..."

  • @josephschanne9144
    @josephschanne9144 2 года назад

    GREAT STUFF! Thank You!

  • @codelicious6590
    @codelicious6590 2 года назад +1

    Life-sized greebling! Oh yeah! That landing gear is beautiful.

  • @Sigma0283
    @Sigma0283 2 года назад +11

    The original X-Wing is still the best.

  • @jros2721
    @jros2721 2 года назад +2

    Awesome stuff!

  • @mrb3991
    @mrb3991 2 года назад

    wow that's an awesome video, thanks

  • @MattDaBoneless
    @MattDaBoneless 2 года назад

    You really kill me man. You have the best job on the planet.

  • @MrSFSTUDIOS
    @MrSFSTUDIOS Год назад

    I wish they had done this with the BSG Vipers and Raiders. Such great art needs to be preserved and shared to inspire future generations. It should not be left to rot outside or hoarded away by rich collectors.

  • @adamw8349
    @adamw8349 2 года назад +25

    This is amazing, I never thought a X-wing would be in the Smithsonian.

    • @5055hunter
      @5055hunter 2 года назад +10

      Why not? The USS Enterprise from Star Trek is there, seems only fair! LOL!

    • @thewalrus511
      @thewalrus511 2 года назад +7

      It’s a shame it’s a shitty one from the new movies. Oh well.

    • @Scottie8740
      @Scottie8740 2 года назад +1

      @@5055hunter Well… not a full size fictional toy. The close Encounters ship is on display too. But that is only three to four feet in diameter. Not sure what size the Enterprise toy is but it’s probably about the same.
      I’m was split on this being displayed. Not anymore. As it’s a fictional full size display I think it’s not worth it. It’ll take up space where something of real value could be displayed.

    • @5055hunter
      @5055hunter 2 года назад +6

      @@Scottie8740 Totally agree! I think the Enterprise is the original 6 foot model used for filming. I'm indifferent to this vs. a "real" aircraft display. The Smithsonian needs to attract visitors for all kinds of reasons. If this gives someone a reason to go, I'm for it.

    • @5055hunter
      @5055hunter 2 года назад

      @@thewalrus511 I thought they were working on restoring the one from the original series.

  • @crisrose9707
    @crisrose9707 2 года назад

    some good questions!

  • @glennhawley1192
    @glennhawley1192 2 года назад

    Totally awesome dude....

  • @johnholchin
    @johnholchin 2 года назад +1

    Designing the system to hang the aircraft is a full time job at the Air and Space Museum. 15 years ago I saw the job posting when I was finishing my aerospace engineering degree.

  • @carlthornton3076
    @carlthornton3076 2 года назад

    Very Good!.

  • @projectcolonialviper2094
    @projectcolonialviper2094 Год назад

    My kinda people! Thanks for the inspiration

  • @SciFiBrony
    @SciFiBrony 2 года назад +1

    I wish you had this kind of content when they were restoring the original 11-foot TOS Enterprise model!

  • @jestersjokers
    @jestersjokers 2 года назад

    Wow so nerdy and I love

  • @alexandersillan8139
    @alexandersillan8139 2 года назад

    I noticed a lot and I mean a lot of the larger tubing with nuts on the end was simple copper tubing with flare nuts used to join the condenser and fan coil unit with Air conditioning.

  • @ArrowTrajectory
    @ArrowTrajectory 2 года назад +3

    I understand that hanging this piece is challenging enough, but imagine if the wings also moved into their X configuration every 30 minutes? I'd wait a half-hour to witness that!

  • @zoinomiko
    @zoinomiko 2 года назад +1

    @5:57 : Suddenly Adam becomes envious of welders. XD

  • @clayp6415
    @clayp6415 2 года назад

    I like Adam talking and building movie props much better than when he was on myth busters

  • @JGT_rblx
    @JGT_rblx 2 года назад

    Feels cool to finally see something before the man who see’s everything first

  • @ordfueler
    @ordfueler 2 года назад +1

    Awesome :)

  • @Mocking69
    @Mocking69 2 года назад

    Hideki is very impressed with the big model.

  • @aly_voight
    @aly_voight 2 года назад +5

    That’s my dad!!

    • @tested
      @tested  2 года назад +4

      He's awesome!

    • @aly_voight
      @aly_voight 2 года назад +3

      @@tested he really is! We used to always watch myth buster and I was so excited when he told me he spent the day with you!

  • @forthwithtx5852
    @forthwithtx5852 2 года назад

    1:42 Phillips head screws. Or maybe they are JIS and that’s OK.
    That rear panel really is a work of art. I don’t know why something like whatever it is supposed to be would be exposed like that, but it is cool to look at. I always got the impression in science fiction that durability of things mechanical is something the future people have gotten really figured out. Everything works forever. Even if it’s sunk in a crappy lagoon for weeks/months/years. That is, until it gets blasted or deactivated.

  • @tonygunk1886
    @tonygunk1886 2 года назад

    Lol I swear I just seen a 4L60 clutch band in there as well..
    Well done 👍

  • @datgio4951
    @datgio4951 2 года назад

    Bro when Adam poked his head into that Air intake my head got blown off just by the shear size of that thing!

  • @TheSaturnV
    @TheSaturnV 2 года назад

    The back section of the original X-wing's fuselage is based around the upper hull of a Tamiya Sherman tank model.

  • @taliaperkins1389
    @taliaperkins1389 2 года назад

    I like the relay sockets...

  • @williamdecker3989
    @williamdecker3989 2 года назад +3

    I keep looking at the seam where the wing opens, I assume it will be hung up in "Attack" or open position?

    • @redkittyproject
      @redkittyproject 2 года назад +5

      Do these wings even spread or is this one made to to look like it does but the seam is actually sealed?

    • @souleatingpanda
      @souleatingpanda 2 года назад +4

      i was wondering that myself. But he did say it was made to be in a landing position. So i have doubt the attack position internals have detail in them, or even open up :(

    • @thirdeyenz
      @thirdeyenz 2 года назад

      Sadly there's just no way they'd have engineered a system that would never have been used on set. So no.

  • @Die-CastMetal
    @Die-CastMetal 2 года назад +5

    My dream car…someday.

  • @robwebnoid5763
    @robwebnoid5763 2 года назад

    6:51 ... " I cannot wait to see it in the air ..."
    - Yes, would like to see it FLY in the air. Sure, it's been done before as a small kit rocket & as a RC airplane, but as lifesize? Epic.

  • @residentmemberofhell
    @residentmemberofhell 2 года назад

    I wonder if that got sent instead of one of the cooler OG T-65's because of filming on Rogue squadron and other Rebellion era projects?

  • @russbentley7677
    @russbentley7677 2 года назад

    Aside from prolonged closeup, the thing missing is the vehicle... the whole thing, which we get to see for about a second obscured by stuff.

  • @timtheskeptic1147
    @timtheskeptic1147 2 года назад +1

    The ingenuity of prop-makers is a huge middle finger to the restorers and preservers of their creations. It's a huge leap from parts you find on an old bicycle in a pawn shop to having actual part numbers from the manufacturer.

  • @philkight2630
    @philkight2630 2 года назад +5

    Thank you guys for masking up. Great video

    • @1pcfred
      @1pcfred 2 года назад +1

      Promote the theater.

    • @wisico640
      @wisico640 2 года назад

      @@1pcfred pardon me?

    • @1pcfred
      @1pcfred 2 года назад

      @@wisico640 what for?

    • @wisico640
      @wisico640 2 года назад +1

      @@1pcfred idk, it's just that I caught covid, it wasn't too bad but the last 2 days I was ready to die & changed my view on a lot of things around this situation.
      I'm in my 20s & active and healthy...

    • @1pcfred
      @1pcfred 2 года назад +1

      @@wisico640 I've been sick a few times in my life too. Mortality is something to contemplate. A coward dies a thousand times before his death, but the valiant taste of death but once. It seems to me most strange that men should fear, seeing that death, a necessary end, will come when it will come. Basically don't worry about it. Stress is a leading cause of death itself.

  • @SnakeKonig
    @SnakeKonig 2 года назад +1

    10,000 years from now,, this props will fall into ancient mysteries.. they will believe we fly in space..

  • @mattguey-lee4845
    @mattguey-lee4845 2 года назад

    I do n-scale model trains and I was surprised by how much n-scale train parts they used.

  • @tyfon4429
    @tyfon4429 2 года назад

    Is there a tour on the X-Wing ?

  • @davidpippin3460
    @davidpippin3460 2 года назад

    Please finish restoration on the HO-229 (only one in the world) and the BA-349 natter.

  • @kingjames4886
    @kingjames4886 2 года назад +4

    though a lot more people are going to build a replica light saber than an x-wing...

  • @staticfanatic6361
    @staticfanatic6361 2 года назад

    1:05 Radio tube socket at the far 9:00 position !

  • @jaredscott367
    @jaredscott367 2 года назад

    wanted to see the cockpit

  • @sal1701
    @sal1701 2 года назад

    Anyone else noticed the stenciling (2:50) on the side of the fuselage ? Look like its say Black Happy Thielan, anyone know what it means ??

  • @travismcgee9333
    @travismcgee9333 2 года назад

    does the cockpit detailed too or just outside?

  • @michaelsteinbach
    @michaelsteinbach 2 года назад +1

    Maybe Adam could 3D print some caps that fit over the hanging hardware and look more like something from the Star Wars universe.

  • @Bendit1974
    @Bendit1974 2 года назад

    Guy has the best title ever: X-Wing Mechanic.

  • @joshualefholz7145
    @joshualefholz7145 2 года назад +2

    I thought that the new trilogy confirm that Philips head is cannon with Rey's staff :P

  • @davidcantrell5098
    @davidcantrell5098 2 года назад +3

    The biggest problem I have with the new X-wings is that the have those turbine looking engine intakes that are supposed to split horizontally. LOL Maybe it's just an intake and the turbine sections are further back.

    • @520azdc
      @520azdc 2 года назад

      They look like jet engines we have on Earth but in the Star Wars universe they don't function like jet engines. They're intakes but they're not turbines. They don't spin.

    • @jaredscott367
      @jaredscott367 2 года назад

      @@520azdc good point

  • @Kashanta
    @Kashanta 2 года назад

    I could just watch videos about the x-wing forever, lol.

  • @CallMeSquirrelly
    @CallMeSquirrelly 2 года назад

    so I read this as "FRICTION based aircraft" and thought this was going to be some mind-blowing propulsion mechanism i had never heard of. this is neat too though.

    • @CallMeSquirrelly
      @CallMeSquirrelly 2 года назад

      before anyone else says it I KNOW. i was thinking friction-based engine not lift.

  • @EL-Duder-Reno
    @EL-Duder-Reno 2 года назад +1

    So when will this be on display to the public?

    • @tested
      @tested  2 года назад +1

      2022

    • @jasonpeacock9735
      @jasonpeacock9735 2 года назад +1

      It’s technically on display now. This was filmed in the restoration hanger of the Udvar-Hazy Center. There is a mezzanine visitors can use to watch the work. I was there a couple months ago and was able to get photos of it. And they have signage for it on the mezzanine as well.

  • @wirelesmike73
    @wirelesmike73 2 года назад +1

    As cool as all of this is, I don't understand the need to fly it up off of the floor. It was designed to be in the landed position. Why not just display it on the ground, canopy open, ladder down, and ready to board. Let visitors walk around it and see it up close (obviously with barriers to prevent them from touching it). It's going to look odd hanging in a nosedive with the landing gear down. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but... Shouldn't it be BB-8 in the rear co-piloting?

    • @jasonpeacock9735
      @jasonpeacock9735 2 года назад +1

      Ground space is at a premium in the museum. Also, its easier for them to have something hanging than to constantly have work around it in the ground.

  • @jeff1176
    @jeff1176 2 года назад

    Will it be shown in the attack position(Xwings open)? Or closed?

    • @jasonpeacock9735
      @jasonpeacock9735 2 года назад

      Since there was no need for it to ever open it’s S-foils on screen, you can guarantee that function wasn’t built into this prop.

  • @umbraelegios4130
    @umbraelegios4130 2 года назад +1

    Guesses on how many SD cards Adam used documenting the X Wing.

  • @torque91
    @torque91 2 года назад +1

    Would have been cool if it was a T-65 instead of a Poe-mobile.

  • @diamondproductions2
    @diamondproductions2 2 года назад +1

    Such a shame it’s a sequel X-wing and not an original trilogy one

  • @bobbyblazini
    @bobbyblazini 2 года назад

    I wish I could've worked for museums.

  • @YoungsooPark
    @YoungsooPark 2 года назад

    뭔 수록 양덕을 이기냐.. 최고다,,

  • @Rusty_Gold85
    @Rusty_Gold85 2 года назад

    I imagine she is based on the ground in hard sand with foot prints , BB8 track rollaways and repair modules hosed up to it, all barried off from touching off course . Have a Test bench unoccupied linked up waiting for the ground crew to come back look to it

  • @JasonGlisson
    @JasonGlisson 2 года назад

    Have they explained how they shipped this and got it to the Smithsonian?

  • @leelindsay5618
    @leelindsay5618 2 года назад

    Looks like these folks are as jazzed up to talk to Adam, as Adam is to talk to them.

  • @kirkwagner461
    @kirkwagner461 2 года назад +1

    I wonder what the craftsmen at Lucas Arts think about when they watch something like this?

  • @Vinemaple
    @Vinemaple 2 года назад +1

    I'd say hanging an X-Wing with a Jurgens ring gives it a "it's a spacecraft, and we hung it like any other spacecraft" authenticity. Pretty neat, IMHO. But, twenty years?? What X-wing IS this? I thought the curator said it was from episode 9!

  • @Nderak
    @Nderak 2 года назад

    wow

  • @clarence4343
    @clarence4343 2 года назад

    Thats a cool facemask adam,

  • @Alantheleopard
    @Alantheleopard 2 года назад

    Much as I always liked the design of the X-Wing fighter family (including those of the original trilogy) I find it somehow absurd (or at least bizarre, or puzzling) that they left their "butt" uncovered, showing openly all mechanisms on display there. Why didn't they shut it, and with some armored plate or something? It´s like a call for enemy fighters saying "spank me here...". Maybe cooling problems are the main ground why they left the rear unveiled?...
    Also, I don't find much sense that the turbines of this latest version of the X-Wing are divided or cut by the half. I know, it´s a sci-fi machine, but if we compare it with the intakes of real jets, I wonder how the turbine blades can spin enough so as to provide the engines with enough power. Then again, it´s all sci-fi, I know, but the old T-65 X-Wing, with its rounded air intakes, looks to me at least in that sense more realistic than this one.

  • @TheLeatheryman
    @TheLeatheryman 2 года назад

    So they put those aft section greeblies together 20 years ago?

  • @krashdown102
    @krashdown102 2 года назад

    What movie is it from

  • @richsackett3423
    @richsackett3423 2 года назад +1

    W...W? The light saber is based on a Speed Graphic's flash handle?! I must be nerdier than I thought to be so thrilled by that.

    • @stevetheduck1425
      @stevetheduck1425 2 года назад +1

      I was in the Royal Air Force from 1976 to 1986, and I was a photographer and later lithographer.
      The standard 120 roll film camera we used was either a Hassleblad or a Rolleiflex, and the flash unit we used for both was that Graflex that was obviously the source of Luke's lightsabre; it had a folding reflector for the flashbulbs that I have never seen again.
      We had dozens of them, often stored in drawers as most photography could be done in the studio or quicker using available light.
      When doing PR photography, we would routinely use these items, and I spent hours wondering how I could spirit some away, but the accounting for equipment was rigorous those days.

    • @richsackett3423
      @richsackett3423 2 года назад

      @@stevetheduck1425 No idea they were once as common as muck in some quarters.

  • @g3heathen209
    @g3heathen209 2 года назад

    Is that a wing off of a b17 in the background?

    • @jasonpeacock9735
      @jasonpeacock9735 2 года назад

      It’s a B-26 named “Flak Bait”. The aircraft with the most combat missions during WWII.

  • @narutobroken
    @narutobroken 2 года назад +28

    I wish they had an X-Wing from the original trilogy rather than these new Disney movies

    • @stephen300o6
      @stephen300o6 2 года назад +4

      It is reflecting the McQuarrie concept artwork. Which is actually more elegant than the original movies version really.

    • @1pcfred
      @1pcfred 2 года назад +2

      @@stephen300o6 the original Stars movies are the only Star Wars movies. Just the first two really.

    • @Pygar2
      @Pygar2 2 года назад

      @@1pcfred I'm fond of #3, but suspect DisneyWoke will put Huttslayer Leia in a Burkha...

    • @1pcfred
      @1pcfred 2 года назад

      @@Pygar2 the name sounds familiar and I've probably seen it but I don't recall the movie really. Once I started watching I'm sure I'd be like I remember this. I'm not the biggest Star Wars fan today though. When the first one came out I was into it. Lots were. The second is probably a better movie too. Although I didn't go out to see that one in a theater. But I did see the first one opening week.

    • @Pygar2
      @Pygar2 2 года назад

      @@1pcfred Watch ROTJ; I'm sure you'll agree putting Leia in a burkha would be going a bit far...

  • @chrissmith7669
    @chrissmith7669 2 года назад

    Don’t they also now have the Original restored Galileo 7 from Star Trek; Original Series?

  • @nathanwood5977
    @nathanwood5977 2 года назад

    I want to build something like this when I retire. I hate the idea of sitting doing nothing.

  • @Geeksmithing
    @Geeksmithing 2 года назад +1

    Rey had Philips head screws on her staff.

  • @johncunningham4820
    @johncunningham4820 2 года назад

    Fabulous 1:1 scale Model . Now you just have to work out the Internals .

  • @MacNifty
    @MacNifty 2 года назад +3

    Those items they talk about really hard to find are very easy to make with today's industrial principles.

  • @c-028
    @c-028 2 года назад +1

    few centuries later people will wonder this is what fighter airplane looks like during the cold war when they saw this planes.😂