WHO WON THE TRANSFER WINDOW?! - PREMIER LEAGUE 2019/20
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- The 2019/20 summer transfer window is closed! I take a look at the business done by the 20 Premier League clubs & rank them to see who's had the best window!
► Subscribe: bit.ly/subSPEN
► Follow me on Twitter! - / spencerowen
► Follow me on Instagram! - bit.ly/spengram
► Hashtag United channel - / hashtagunited
► Buy Hashtag United merch! hashtagutd.com
Music by Epidemic Sound.
Thumbnail by / danbdesign
What videos would you like to see next from me guys?
wheel of fortune
Wheel of futune
Rank kits maybe
Q&A about Hashtag!!
Rank kits
"Burnley haven’t lost anyone huge" well they did get rid of Peter Crouch
That's good 😂
Good point😂
Lame
Nice
They didn’t really get rid of him he retired himself
I can never resist a spen doggy dog video
About time i see some good uploads from spen, feels like the last one i can remember is wheel of FUT season 1
Fulham panic-bought on deadline day. They didn’t buy players who worked in the team but players who were good, just not for them.
Villa planned their transfers, bought players who work well under smith and have bought them early on so they can spend pre season adjusting. That Fulham comparison is lazy and doesn’t work. No one makes fun in wolves for signing 16 players after getting promoted
As a palace fan, it pains me to say that your right. We didn't reinvest the wan-bissaka money and we still have holes at both fullback slots and are a striker light
Arsenal bias is unreal mans still hurt by payet and ozil debate 🤣🤣
Wolves didn’t sell Ruddy, we sold Norris. Also a GK so fair enough
How tf is Liverpool 7th? They've signed basically no one
They signed a back up defender and a back up goalkeeper which ended up being a smart move because allison is injured now. Wouldnt want mignolet in goal.
This video hit the upper Benjamin's in my book
Spencer fc really said ima head out
Carroll’s wage is pay as you play but I wouldn’t think he’d be getting paid ridiculous amounts
City won because they are already strongest , yet they keep upgrading by signing Cancelo and Rodri.Spurs are 2nd with Ndombele and Lo Celso and Arsenal are 3rd with United 4th due to defense improvements , but lack of offense improvements. Just my opinion as a United fan.
I would put Leicester number 1, selling an average defender for £80m and bringing in Praet and Tielemens is amazing business
West Ham had a shocking window
You missed out on harvey elliot but great video
United at fifth is so wrong...They didnt replace Lukaku or Herrera,yes they sorted their defence a bit(still one center back short in my opinion) but that midfield is just shocking.West Ham at sixth is a bit biased as well.
As a spurs fan, I personally believe Arsenal have had the better window; they’ve strengthened everywhere where Spurs have got weaker in defence; however, I do think the pedigree and length of acquisitions, Spurs excel.
Villa would not stand a chance if we didn’t spend a bunch of money as we would have had not enough players
Helder Costa will be at Leeds permanently next season
Great video totally agree
How tf is villa so low they brought in some class players
Great vid
I would say WestHam had a better transfer window than ManU.
Personally I don’t think Leicester should be that low, we have Evans who’s solid benkovic who we loaned to Celtic last season and he worked with Rodgers whilst he was there, yes we didn’t reinvest the money but we only received 70 ish million of that as his release clause from hull. And yes Man U over payed but that means all other clubs are over charging so it’s pointless.
I agree with u spencer
Shouldve had liverpool at like 17th they got absolutely nobody and didnt even have a transfer ban like chelsea
Liverpool did not have the 7th best transfer window, I'm sorry man
2:49 "Huge that they kept Zaha, but it doesn't mark an improvement in their squad, it marks consistency"
14:00 "Sometimes keeping players is just as important as signing players."
Spen doesn't like Palace does he.
I think it's key to remember he was clear in his evaluation. Keeping a want-a-way star player is important because he's a star player but there's no sign of intent of investment into the defence or attack for the club and who knows the effect he could have on the boys in the dressing room when it is quite clear he wanted to move on. Think it's unfair to say he doesn't like Palace, I'd like to think he is as neutral as he can be. Obviously he loves West Ham but he put Spurs 1st and the rivalry there is fierce. Ultimately I think Palace did well not to cave to lowball offers but then again 100M for a 60M at best player is steep. I do respect your opinion though and understand how important he was to Palace last season.
TwisterPvP Palace lost Wan-Bissaka though, he was great for them last year
Ya but zaha carries them he is that important
They lost Bissaka
Palace are wankers
Liverpool should be lower they didnt have a good window, Spencer FC you are a legend mate, I love your content :)
Jack Welsh So that means every top team are good so they don’t need to sign anyone
The thing is Liverpool could of signed another cb or midfielder in replace for James Milner as it is basically the end of his career
geobolt28 Liverpool didn’t really need to be busy this window... the fact that they kept all their main players is a bonus
geobolt28 how didn’t we have a good window, We signed two players for the future, made profit, signed a better back up keeper. Besides Klopp has openly come out and said he’s waiting for the players he wants to become available rather than spending money because everyone else is
Every other team in the top 6 (besides Chelsea) have all strengthened significantly. Liverpool definitely needed to spend some money
ASTON VILLA only had 15 players at the start of this transfer window that’s why they spent soo much
We spent loads of money and got good players and still came below Norwich
Exactly mate, people are just being lazy saying “doing a Fulham”
Fulham comparison is so stupid. Fulham panic bought big names, we spent shrewdly and improved our side all over the park. Think we’ll shut up a lot of armchair critics this season. UTV!
@@coreymeddings3115 what good players
ReiZ Jack heaton buying el ghazi , mings and a few young players
This is a table for the transfer window not their squads, how can liverpool be 7th they’ve literally bought nobody worth any notice???
Sluggy they should be at least 20th for getting rid of Bogfan the Hungarian Buffon
As a Liverpool fan I agree, we missed an opportunity
Alright mate salah had an offer 142 mil from madrid before the champions league win Manè got one aswel before champions league win madrid offered 125mil didnt leave whats the answer mate liverpool should be credited but the players the most because they didnt want to leave because they saw potential like everyone could have left but didnt klopp didnt buy players so he can buy them in the winter so he can see who is underperforming so the position can have depth like what you on about mate?
Edwin Teh Glorious still doesn’t change the fact that they haven’t improved their squads unlike most other premier league teams.
@@louispride7695 still klopp does want to see and the players and improve in the winter transfer window
Carrol is on a pay-as-you-play contract which I think is great business
Alex Davis as a Hammer, I can assure you it’d feel a lot less painful when you see him partying in Spain.
So Palace won’t get any extra points for keeping Zaha, but Liverpool is 7th for signing a 15 year old?
Noah Wold a transfer window isn’t just about signings. Liverpool haven’t lost anyone of any note and didn’t need to do anything. Palace lost arguably their best and most consistent player from last season and didn’t replace him. They also didn’t strengthen in any of the areas they needed strengthening and their best player is now unhappy at the club and is desperate to leave. So yes, Spencer is right in what he said
Noah Wold so you’re trying to tell me keeping Zaha is equal to keeping Mane,Salah,Van Dijk,Firmino etc.
Un Named to Palace? Yes
@@JUK3B0X every team must strengthen and it was imperative for liverpool to strengthen in order to catch up man city
ReiZ Jack Yes I agree even as a Liverpool fan I’m disappointed we didn’t make any significant signings just saying that keeping Zaha isn’t equal to keeping mane,salah etc
Watched Spencer when he was ‘Fifa Playa’
Weird flex
Same
Medals in the post mate
jack galvin good chat lad
Don’t care
Missed out on Bournemouth signing Harry Wilson and didn’t talk about Newcastle missing out on Rondon. But either way great video🙌🙌
David Luiz "strengthens" Arsenal?
Are you sure about that now?
Definitely not after yesterday LMAO
Liverpool shouldn’t be credited for keeping players that were never gonna leave anyway. Key players will never leave a champions league winning squad
JJ Brinkman ronaldo
Doge Man3.0 different scenario tho if salah had won four champions leagues I’m sure he’d be looking to move on
Doge Man3.0 Ronaldo had a bad wage
Doge Man3.0 Ronaldo had a bad wage
JJ Brinkman yeh lol if it is credited then why tf is Palace 19th when they kept Zaha. Spencer is more contradictory than a bible no 🧢
You put Liverpool 7th for keeping their players, but put crystal palace 19th saying 'they kept zaha but that doesn't count as part of the transfer window'.
Wan bissaka
palace needed to buy players, liverpool did not
How original! "Doing a Fulham" we got rid of loads of players so we had to replace them, what should we of done played a whole season with 14 players?
XxKingShark90xX someones madddd
you’re going down so enjoy being in these videos whilst it lasts
@@dolphinmainkhalifa Not mad at all, just dissapointed in people thinking were fulham! Yes we have been in the Championship for 3 seasons but we got rid of 15 players that were old and slow.. now we have had to replace them with younger and hungrier players.
@@jackmaidment7286 Too funny, we will see who has the last laugh come may 2020!
@@hubbard_3000 it's still doing a Fulham and you have replaced about half your squad which changes the dynamic and makes it require time to get used to and the signings villa have brought in aren't anything special.
"If you pronounce the 'J' in Juventus, you're not a football fan." Spencer at 19:58 🙄🙄😂😂
Been watching since 2014 keep up the good work Spence!💪🏼❤
Spencer: “Tottenham has spent 75 million, which is a lot”
Also Spencer: Arsenal has spent 92 million, which is good and expected from a team like them”
TYTYT TYTYT Well Arsenal are way bigger than spurs and would have a greater income
Mossy Hehir true
I guess that Arsenal have more investors than Tottenham, but if you exclude that, Tottenham have gotten way further than Arsenal in most competitions the last few years.
If you there for presume that Arsenal have a bigger income (excluding investors) think again
@@notieming Both reached Finals last year. Obviously Tottenham were in a much more lucrative and competitive tournament but they still both got there and I think honestly both spent a lot of money but if you look at Arsenal they spread the cost of a lot of deals to manage it. As a Manchester United fan I'm happy we sured up the defence but for a team that is getting outscored by the rest of the big six we needed creativity and attacking threat which both these teams now have in abundance. Also can we talk about Tottenham holding on to Alderweireld and Eriksen so far, that's big. I'd say Spurs had the best window, much needed investment into a scary but impressive project. Looking forward to this season, except to see where United finish because I don't see us breaking top four.
@@swishreacts2833 I agree but also with a new stadium that cost more than first thought and had construction troubles to pay for it is a lot of money. When Spurs are usually tightly run and don't often have Net spends that high it is a shock to the system but again to hold on to 99% of that Champions League Runners up team and to improve in much needed positions is very impressive and good business. Think they had the best window by far and shown really great intent to push on at the new home of theirs
Id take 13th in real life .never minde transfers 🤣
If I'm being honest as a Spurs fan I would put us second because we are probably going to sell Eriksen and we didn't get dybala
Aaron De Silva I would put you about 10th
lmao
I’m an Arsenal fan but I’m agreeing with that beacause u sold trippier big player
Spencer, please bring back an online fm career or the wheel of futune
Arsenal in second and spurs in 1st. Arsenal had a massive makeover whilst spurs bought a couple of players to strengthen their team. Smh
"massive makeover", they barely got rid of anyone (Mustafi, Xhaka, Özil still at the club), bought a good young LB, got on loan a gifted cm who hasn't proven himself yet, bought an old CB who is way past his prime and got a world class winger but did they really need to spend most of their money on him? Arsenal will not finish in the top 4 this season
Scepster so you are sayin Man U or Chelsea will finish above us? None of the massively improved their team compared to us...
Alluse “massive makeover”?- they brought in three players, so did spurs
@@alexedwards3630 6 mate not 3
Alex Edwards 6 players* minus Saliba on loan
We had 18 players after play offs man
were not fulum
Still might struggle it unsettles the squad
@@midsh1p205 so don't sign players?
@@bilalahmed-little9976 he never said that he's just saying it's a lose lose situation
You shouldn’t be on the prem Leeds should
Alexander James we’re bigger than Leeds they’re tinpot
Most of the newly promoted clubs who spend a big amount of money have managed to stay in the league. People are only comparing villa to Fulham now because it is the most recent example. Wolves had a net spend of over 80 million last year and finished seventh. Why are villa going to perform like Fulham and not more like wolves. We clearly have a strategy unlike Fulham last year.
Ayoze perez only starts playing in March not that big of deal we lost him not that many fans are bothered
Craig ‘ also we get Carrol nd joel 😂😂 do they not realise we have better players
Big lad 200 yeah exactly almiron is basically a new signing with him getting a full season st maximin will also chip in it is going to be a good season for nufc can’t believe we are predicted to get relegated just because we have lost rafa
Craig fully agree mate 👍
Reality creator 666 kNOw DON'T b3LIEv3 relegation is certainly not nonsense. It will be close, but I think Newcastle will stay up.
In my opinion arsenal did better than Tottenham
BLKOPSTUBE _1231 agreed
Arsenal has more problems to deal with and addressed them
Jay Cartwright did they? Sign a 32 y/o cb who may contribute for a season, signed one midfielder in a midfield that needs strengthening and they spent pretty much all their money on an attacker which wasn’t necessarily vital to their season when they could have bought a top quality defender.
Disagree
Arsenal needed a:
Winger: Brought in Peep
LB: Brought in Tierney
CB: Brought in David Luiz and Saliva
And Ceballos will be a good Ramsey replacement this year. Martinelli is one for the future too
I'm a tottenham fan but I think arsenal had the best transfer window fair play arsenal
As an Arsenal fan, we both had really good windows and the NLDs are going to be very entertaining
@@gulumba_man2386 I agree 100%
Fair play to you I am arsenal fan I agree
If you keep Erikson this much closer but if Erikson leaves then I'd say it's Arsenal at number one
As a fellow Tottenham fan, I'm intrigued to find out why you think arsenal did better because I disagree
How can Spurs be first? Let's say Kane gets injured who will be their striker then? If Son plays striker then they will have to put someone like Nkoudou in at LM. Arsenal on the other hand have lost Ramsey but they have replaced him with Ceballos and besides him, they have strenghen their squad massively and if one of Arsenal players gets injured then they have good backup on all positions. So I don't really get that tbh.
Otherwise good video Spencer, good to have you back.
Surely using the logic with Joelinton and Haller they are both unproven signings who have good potential so surely West Ham should be lower or Newcastle Higher?
Joelinson lol
Tell me if im wrong but how is Leicester a rival of Newcastle? Leicester is a top 10 PL team while Newcastle is a mid to low table PL team. I don't quite understand what you're saying here
Think it's mostly that they are both in a really competitive league and the games against each other could have huge impacts on each season respectively. Not that they compete against each other more that they could each get points off each other
Im Newcastle fan and were no where near Leicester.
Been waiting by my phone since the window closed for this video Spen Doggy Dog
I’m a Manchester United fan and I think you put them way too high, this window was trash for us.
Not really we got a beast defense now. And we got rid of lukaku and velencia
Tyiler Hanks we also lost our hardest working player and our 2nd best midfielder in Herrera and now instead of him we have one world class midfielder with an average and mid table midfield around him
@@xdanrp7981 you're forgetting that we have scott mctominay and hes got elite leadership material
TH Gaming Wales beast defense lol after watching sevilla a tjink u shud delete this comment
love the channel but as a Villa fan its getting mad frustrating hearing so many people criticise our transfer business in the summer. The fulham comparison is tired and lazy imo, ultimately we haven't tampered with the main core of our squad that actually got us promoted and can push us forward. Whereas Fulham
We lost 14/15 players this summer including Jedinak, Whelan, Micah Richards, Adomah and Ross McCormack to name a few. All players who either only played last season due our lack of quality and depth or haven't featured in our team for years. However these players were some of our highest wage earners and if we kept hold of them we'd be favourites for relegation.
Even if we didn't get promoted we would've had to do a massive rebuild. With all our signings you will find there are links with a handful players either playing under Smiths management before or playing with eachother at international youth level or for a previous team. No chance of anyone feeling alienated on the training ground.
Also if you actually look at the Squad we would've had if we didn't make all those signings, you'd see that we have heavily strengthened and we have competitions for starting spots in every position despite having the least time to do transfer dealings out of all the premier league sides. Also on average our spending equals out to £11m per signing which with our signings and in this day and age in football isn't bad going.
I do understand the concerns but the bulk of our business was done before our first friendly nearly a month ago, the team have had a lot of time to integrate and there is a strong sense of camaraderie in the camp.
love the channel spen been following since your first video, just think Villa are heavily misunderstood in the challenge they faced this window and they have prior to popular belief done a great job. Hopefully it sets a platform for us to push on and improve in future seasons.
UTV!
Im a liverpool fan but even im sad at the fact that kompany left man city after basically winning the league for them against leister.
F for him leaving Man city.
Snipez _Games it was pre arranged, I’m a city fan. It was 11 years service. It’s fine he’s gone
@@dankedoge9782 he won you lucky fellows the league arent you sad it wont happen this year?
I reckon liverpool are very low with arsenal winners
Yes Liverpool kept their big players, But they were never in any danger of leaving in the first place. It’s different for a team like palace because all of their star players were wanted by big clubs. Not one of Liverpool’s key players were linked away with a move this summer so therefore it is easier for Klopp to keep his players where as it wasn’t as easy with teams like Palace, Everton, Leicester and Chelsea. Not to mention they have brought no one in, Liverpool should be at least in the bottom half of the table
Carroll is on a pay as you play contract so it’s a no brainer for Newcastle
Arsenal had the best window. Added to the lethal attack, strengthened the defence and plugged any holes in midfield. Martinelli looks to be a good young addition.
SherifB123 your having a laugh
@@juliankane9403 any reason why? Or just another person with no argument
Alex Jones The main comment didn’t have an argument for it either 😂
@@jamen_a6811 more of a reason than 'your having a laugh'. I could give you a list of reasons. As an arsenal fan I personally think spurs could also be argued to have had the best window.
This May be a very unpopular/slightly biased opinion but I feel Chelsea has one of the best windows if not the best despite the ban.
Why?
Almost 280 mil gained through player sales where Marina miraculously has pulled so much £ out of deadwood.
Of course bringing in Kovacic and Pulisic who will both excel in Franks early system.
Not only this but we’ve managed to pen down some of England’s most important players who will be the future and current spine of Chelsea and English Football such a RLC, CHO, Mason Mount, Tammy Abraham Reece James, Fikayo Tomori etc
Also smartly extending contracts of other player such as the Willian’s, Pedro’s, David Luiz, etc where we can get the max amount for the deadwood next summer.
We have also made clear of the new era and approach the club and hierarchy are taking by appointing Super Frankie Lampard who has the exact same philosophy as the club and bringing in Cech and Makelele, soon Drogba, to bring the Chelsea back etc
Overall we have had a criminally underrated window for the business we have done and the way the club is moving. We are massively going under the radar, and as everyone knows, that’s the worst thing you can do to is because we’ll always perform and do the impossible.
HOW ARE LIVERPOOL SO HIGH UP?
@@harrijones3193 only one
anyone else noticed they have deleted there Spencer and Alex channel
23k off 2 million. Keep up the good work Spen
Spencer - 'Palace not losing Zaha doesn't effect their transfer window rating'
Also Spencer - 'Liverpool not losing the big names means there 7th'
What was Villa meant to do, Spencer? “Changed too much”. Did you see Villa’s squad after last season? Lost Tammy (no chance of signing him), same with Tuanzebe. Lost Adomah, Whelan, Jedinak, Hutton, Elphick. James Chester, our club captain, was essentially a loss with his injuries now. Maybe those names don’t seem like much but that’s our top scorer from 17-18 and 16-17. Also former captains and our club’s leaders. We could’ve lost even more in Mings, Hause, and El Ghazi but the club signed them permanently after their loans.
Our squad was completely and utterly barebones so what else were Villa supposed to do? They spread out their transfers and thought carefully, unlike Fulham who splashed all their cash at the end of the window in a panic. I’m disappointed you essentially just went with the “doing a Fulham” sentiment when in reality they’re quite different. We’ll see if the end product is the same, but the strategies were different.
Villa NEEDED to sign players.
Arsenal 2nd. I’m sorry but they have made significantly better transfers than s*urs
Brighton also bought Mathew Clarke from portsmouth for just under 5 mil
I'm sorry Spencer, massive fan, but I respectfully disagree. Firstly, yes, West Ham have had a decent window but claiming "None of the players we sold would get into the first team" is just not true, is it? Arnautovic has been practically single handedly dragged West Ham to results for the last season or two and has been your best player IMO, with Lanzini out. Secondly, Man United have had a terrible window. MASSIVELY overpaying for two defenders that should have gone for around 70 mill at most combined. Their midfield is considerably weaker with the loss of herrera, and they have lost their most deadly attacking threat in Lukaku, even if he had an off season for the majority of last year, whilst not replacing the losses. I can't really say how you justify them being in 5th, nor Liverpool being in 7th. Yes, they kept their players, but they didn't improve their squad at all, so not a superb transfer window. Don't get me wrong, not losing players is great. They didn't have a bad window at all! But 7th is just too high to justify, again, IMO. On the other hand, agree with a lot of the others, especially everton and Aston Villa, but I just think you're being biased towards West Ham (Happens to the best of us, always wanting to see the best in your club) and rating Manchester United especially around 5 or 6 places too high. Love the content Spence, just think you were a little off :)
Liverpool have to be bottom of this list. No ambition when clubs around. Spurs and City are vastly improving. A very thin squad
It’s not a thin squad in the slightest,they bought a lot last summer and this summer have invested in youth for the future of anything they have shown more ambition this summer by knowing what they want instead of just throwing money about like a bad man
dennzer DÓD squad is thin. 1RB, 1LB. Origi is meant to be backup for ST and LW. No proper LW cover. Only Shaqiri as RW. And the backups in midfield are big downgrades on their current midfield 3.
James Bower Gk we have Adrian cb we have matip lovren van de berg rb we have clyne hoever lb we can bring Milner in cm Fabinho Henderson wijlnandum milner shaqiri Harry wilson can play there too rw salah shaqiri Lw mane origi st firmino origi
And it would unsettle the team
Also just because they haven’t spent loads of money doesn’t mean there is no ambition
How is man putting Leicester 12th (should be higher), Palace 19th (should be higher), Villa 17th (should be higher) and Liverpool 7th (should be lower)
Crystal Palace: Keeping Zaha doesn’t take you anywhere
Liverpool: Sometimes keeping players is better than buying players
Hey,I have a wierd question. So Spencer it's my good friends birthday on the 18th and he is a biiiiiig fan of you[by fan I mean he's basically becoming you]. So I was wondering if you could say a little happy birthday message in one of your upcoming videos. He is also a big Hashtag fan. His name is Alfie and he's gonna be 11. Anyway, keep up the good work.
How has Liverpool had a better transfer window than Leicester
villa got rid of 12 players on the first day of the window, so they had to spend a lot of money on players to replace those lost players
Love your vids Spence keep up the cracking work
Look Spencer I love you, nut are you high? I would've put spurs bottom 3! They did lose a player from there main team in Trippier, and Llorente was also one of there best strikers. Then they brought in Ndombele who won't fit in with the current team and lo celso can't possibly make the starting 11. Sessegnon also won't make the starting 11. They had one of the worst transfer windows in the country
Good vid, and even as a Chelsea fan I can't be mad lol
I think we should be a bit higher. Bc we have Mount, Batsman, Abraham, R.James and Zouma. And they are like new signings
ninja always take a Spencer vid with a grain of salt 99% of what he sais is either wrong or contradictory
ninja they’re not new signings though, they’re just coming back from loan
have to disagree with the villa prediction. The money was spent wisely and had to be done, after they play off final villa had a squad of 14 players. The transfers may not be prolific names but they had to be signed due to the loan players going back and us releasing senior players. We needed to strengthen in certain areas. The signings were also well thought out compared to fulham which has become a big comparison. El Ghazi, Mings and Hause were all bought back. Konsa and Jota had played under smith before, Targett and Heaton have had premier league games and are not risky signings in my opinion. Douglas Luiz had been picked out by pep guardiola over the last few seasons but couldnt play due to a work permit. The only risky signings are marvelous, trezeguet and wesley who have all shown promise in their leagues respectively. Yes we may have overspent on some players but these were all thought out necessary transfers unlike fulham who panic spent on deadline day.
Man U 4-0 Chelsea, watching just a few hours after, who else?
I dont agree.. I think Arsenal would be number one and spurs number two. Arsenal did make better signings on crucial areas, yes they lost their cm. But spurs lost their rightback... The Gunners had the best transfer window this Summer, and most of the neutral soccer fans will agree
With Southampton your missing danso he was announced after deadline day
Great vid Spen! Respect the grind, well done on managing Hashtag and uploading on the channel
I'm a Sheffield United fan I'm bias but we signed the best from the championship and people like jagialka mousset and Morrison
You know it’s the start of the prem when spen bangs out these vids.. agreed with most of your points I didn’t find West Hams position biased they had a double decent transfer window
How is Liverpool higher than Wolves? Hahaha They've got Jimenez, Neto, Cutrone and Dendoncker and didn't lose any players from their starting XI
How have Norwich not been put bottom? Get promoted and only spend one million
Ik
Jake Kelly brought in smart loans and already had a good squad
Un Named So your telling me if Man City should have one it because they have the strongest squad. This isn’t about your current squad it’s about who you sign and sell..Jog on mate
Oskar Wano didn’t just say that tho did I. I said they also made some smart loans which by your logic which is “who you sign and sell” should mean they deserve higher than last
Un Named your right it’s ‘WHO’ you sign and sell. By ‘smart’ you mean very mediocre additions that are cheap to an already mediocre side. The transfer window is literally about signing and selling so what else will the table be based on. They made smart moves in terms of barely spending any money but in terms of improving their chances of staying up which is their ambition, I don’t think so pal.
Seriously??? Arsenal done the best business I’ve ever seen in any prem club in the last 10 years, absolutely exellent value with the money we’ve got
Spencer: “I think Andy Carroll's has too many injuries to play”
Also Spencer: “Jack Wilshere can play with Rice in England's midfield”
Mate whhhhaaat liverpool spent 4.4 mill and they won the ucl ????????? They could have got a better midfield imo
Nah fam spurs should’ve been 2nd and arsenal 1 that’s madness🤯🤯🤬
HE DONT LIKE ARSENAL!!!!!!!!!!
Word
Aston Villa is better than that by a long way it’s much different to Fulham as we lost a lot of players at the start of the window and also we bought a lot of player back from loan which is a large amount of spent and we also kept the spine of the team which Fulham did not do we just have just strengthened and deepened our current squad
You placed West ham in 6th place and they lost to man city 5-0
The video was prob made before
Yes he does
Leicester would have won the champions league in the 2016/17 season if they had kept kante and drinkwater for that season
Has to be man utd after signing the new Ryan giggs
Are you mad, he will never be as good
Arsenal first we signed the players we need. We had a horrible defense now we got david luiz and tierney. We have one of the best attacks allready and now we have pepe. And we signned young talent. Plus a midfielder to replace ramsey on loan.
First
Bet I won’t get pinned by SpenDog
Christopher Lindsay stfu
Christopher Lindsay just stfu
Christopher Lindsay seriously just stfu
Christopher lindsay just stfu