Then it should be unlawful for a seller to be home during showings. Same results can apply. Or maybe names should be redacted on offers; only made known after an offer is accepted. Seems ludicrous doesn't it? I think we have gone too far with banning love letters. A house is not just an asset, it is a home. If a seller wants to choose (not reject) a buyer based on a letter, then it should be okay. Yes, some sellers might reject based on this, but I believe that is not the norm and we are punishing everyone else because something might happen.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Then it should be unlawful for a seller to be home during showings. Same results can apply. Or maybe names should be redacted on offers; only made known after an offer is accepted. Seems ludicrous doesn't it? I think we have gone too far with banning love letters. A house is not just an asset, it is a home. If a seller wants to choose (not reject) a buyer based on a letter, then it should be okay. Yes, some sellers might reject based on this, but I believe that is not the norm and we are punishing everyone else because something might happen.
Money talks, BS walks. Forget about love letters. They can have the opposite effect. I'd take the Marquis de Sade if he made a better offer.