Motorweek 2006 Buick Lucerne Road Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @luminator982
    @luminator982 5 месяцев назад +21

    The very last breath of Oldsmobile, the FWD G platform. Damn fine cars

  • @MichaelLovely-mr6oh
    @MichaelLovely-mr6oh 5 месяцев назад +8

    It's great to see a full review of the Buick Lucerne from MotorWeek here on RUclips. Even though I'm almost thirty I love not only the Buick Lucerne; but also the LeSabre (2000-2005,) Century (1997-2005,) Regal (1997-2005 and the generation from the early 2010s,) LaCrosse (2005-2013,) the late 90s Riviera, the Rainer, the Rendezvous and even the Cascada.

  • @dankurz7675
    @dankurz7675 Месяц назад +1

    You know what’s funny? Davis frequently mentioned the Lucerne’s body roll when pushed to handle well and he also talked about the average braking capacity that has the car dip sharply when the binders are hit hard, yet virtually the whole video shows the elegant and poised Lucerne 0:05 negotiating either country roads or sidestepping cones 😅 0:05

  • @justinphillabaum4245
    @justinphillabaum4245 Месяц назад

    I have an ‘06 CXS - love the torque. One of the most comfortable cars I have owned.

  • @michaelhinton6239
    @michaelhinton6239 3 месяца назад +3

    I have a 06 Lucerne cxl with 119k on it, only had it for over 3 months now, im enjoying it with no issues

    • @levapedekranox_8799
      @levapedekranox_8799 2 месяца назад

      I have a 2008 CXL with same mileage and it trully runs like a charm!

  • @mylezzpurhourr
    @mylezzpurhourr 14 дней назад

    Didn’t know this had a 4.6! I thought this had the 5.3 from the Buick lacrosse super lol

  • @steveespinola7652
    @steveespinola7652 Месяц назад +4

    One of Buicks best cars, these babies were bullet proof now Buick just makes ugly looking crossovers even their new badge is ugly

  • @JDMHaze
    @JDMHaze 2 месяца назад +1

    these would’ve been a great rwd car.. this would’ve been the Lincoln town car of its time

  • @DonJuanSeville
    @DonJuanSeville 5 месяцев назад +1

    I HAVE 1

  • @kippaseo8027
    @kippaseo8027 5 месяцев назад +3

    I'm from the future and I'm here to tell you these cars will Have one of the worst automatic transmissions on the market and it will fail.

    • @Xerxes3191
      @Xerxes3191 5 месяцев назад

      You a little too late for that

    • @Andrew-bb3lc
      @Andrew-bb3lc 5 месяцев назад +2

      That GM 4 speed automatic was bullet proof, what are you talking about??? Maybe you should stay in the future and not comment.

    • @bvedant
      @bvedant 5 месяцев назад +3

      Stick with the venerable 3.8

    • @dankurz7675
      @dankurz7675 4 месяца назад

      Wrongo!

    • @dankurz7675
      @dankurz7675 3 месяца назад +3

      Wrongo! Have two with over 110k miles with the original tranny. Both work fine.

  • @ubiased23
    @ubiased23 3 месяца назад

    4 speed automatic transmission in 2006? That's like ancient.

  • @FlowmasterStang
    @FlowmasterStang 5 месяцев назад +1

    275hp is worthless for a V8

    • @Andrew-bb3lc
      @Andrew-bb3lc 5 месяцев назад +4

      Not back then, and in a car, that HP is fine. Torque is more important as we have speed limits in this country and we wouldn’t be able to use all of that HP anyway.

    • @mitch9521
      @mitch9521 5 месяцев назад +2

      If your car doesn't have at least 100000hp from a 0.3L inline 2, its worthless and slow.

    • @FlowmasterStang
      @FlowmasterStang 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@Andrew-bb3lc Alright i’m just saying 275hp from a V8 in 2006 is underwhelming. A nissan altima in 2006 made 270hp from a V6.

    • @Billie-qb2us
      @Billie-qb2us Месяц назад +1

      @@FlowmasterStang​​⁠ The V8 in those cars had 292hp not 275. Also it’s also a luxury car not meant to be a hot rod or win any races bro. it’s a smaller V8 that wasn’t designed to win any races.