Swords answers Tomer's wins, but not Richard's. Tomer sees the value in it because it is a hole in many of his strategies. Richard does not see the value because it is not a hole in many of his strategies. Richard should play it, Tomer should not.
This should be the format of your current tier lists. You don't have to do 32 cards each time, something like 16 or 8 going into a randomly seeded bracket with Chat GPT as the tie-breaker would be excellent viewing. Never before have you guys had as animated or heated debate - this was excellent!
Agreed except for the ChatGPT tiebreaker. It's annoying and makes the end result random and unsatisfying. Hopefully next time they can get Phil to jump in or something.
Love this format. I really prefer this to the tier list stuff, at least with discussing more established cards. The tiebreakers are amazing as you guys form into makeshift 2v2s and it gets hilariously intense as chatgpt reads off her relatively random decision. In general, I think some of your best content comes when you're arguing; so attaching an actual win/lose to the argument works well. Really brings out the salt.
Same I love the arguments and banter. There's so many different archetypes and ways to play mtg that it's always interesting to see people's opinions on cards. Definitely has made me rethink the cards I play and try out cards that I thought was "bad".
@@Princeofseancesame, or Phil jumping in. I hated the ChatGPT tiebreaker, makes everything that came before feel irrelevant since it's just a stupid "AI" making a random decision.
Aint no way subtlety is better than endurance. With subtlety you temporarily counter your opponent's creature which they'll cast next turn and attack you with it for the rest of the game. Counter your opponent's 6-mana/voltron commander? You're their archenemy. Blink it? The whole table is locked from playing the game and will team up on you. Endurance has all the upsides Richard said, ON TOP of being free instant speed out of nowhere full wipe gy interaction. There is no better. Keep in mind, it can also protect YOUR gy from exile hate.
Subtlety has way more potential impact, Idk I don't like to rate cards on how likely I am to get hate from the person I stopped from winning the game. In casual Subtlety just seems better.
yes, but what if the GY is irrelevant? Then the card is useless. Subtlety is always going to hit something. That was the flexibility point being made I believe.
@@kennellfrederick4367 Naturally I would agree with you however if I'm using Endurance, I'm using it on myself more so as a way to protect my graveyard when I don't have access to stifle effects. Black is a very prominent color so I think there's a likely chance to hit someone. But like you said not as much as a Subtlety does because no one can be playing graveyard decks but someone will always play strong creatures.
I appreciate that Crim hates fogs so much, and also is probably the player second only to Phil who would benefit the most from adding them to his deck, considering how often he just ends up with an empty board, having barely any lands, and getting punched every turn for value by Richard's Dowsing Dagger-holder or whatnot.
I think Commandeer is more of a 3 for 2 because not only does your opponent not get their thing, but you get it instead. Kind of like a counter, and theft effect bundled together.
There is something incredibly ironic about Tomer and Crim advocating for a creature that sees almost no play over a card that is "good in cedh." Like, really? Why do you think it might see play in cedh?
Commandeer is not a "3 for 1". It is a "3 for 2". (Or rather, 1-for-3 and 2-for-3, since the "for" should describe the cost) If it just countered the spell, it would be a 1or-3, but since you get the spell, that's one more card of value for you. Which actually compares to Force of Will quite nicely. And really, any spell worth commandeering likely counts for more than 1 card of value. Like, stealing the one ring is technically a 2-for-3 if you free commandeer it, but it quickly pays for itself in terms of cards. Its main problem is it's very hard to actually have those two blue cards in anything but mono blue. But if you have them, you'll likely find a use for this.
yes but I'd like to see a 32 card with ZERO mana (free? no?) cuz i don't understand your video I though i would see 32 enchants or sorcery spells with ZERO mana cost... this is what i am looking for a good list of ZERO mana cost spells ! not creature spoells with MANA costs , how can these be considered FREE ???? what does FREE mean in MTG?
Richard: Shining Shoal has potential, you can pitch a four-drop to pick off one of your opponent's creatures. Also Richard: Swords to Plowshares is a bad card that I cut from all of my white deck. I love your brews, Richard, but holy moly do some of these takes not compute in my brain.
somehow I knew y'all would miss Massacre, which can situationally outshine all these cards and has a really high floor. You can go back to any commander clash episode and quickly find a spot where a 0 mana drown in sorrow would be a massive blowout. It can be a onesided boardwipe, it's better against fast starts, it's one of the most slept-on EDH power cards.
Subtlety is such a terrible card, I actually can't. Endurance is infinitely better. I cannot stress how much I'm team Richard on that one. Also. Fierce has gotta take the dub right?
A cheeky corner case for Reverent Mantra is it makes auras and equipment fall off creatures too, so it could hose a few specific strategies pretty hard
I use Downhill Charge in Ojer Axonil Storm, once you start to cantrip or play some cheap ping spells with Burgi, or Urabrask, or Storm-Kiln out, you'll have a tapped mountain to sac and just add this onto the end of the stack, it'll resolve 1st making making your 7-8 copies of grapeshot do 10 damage each pretty easily. Snapback is obviously better at doing controlly blue things than downhill charge, but red is all about being aggressive and speeding up games
The part not mentioned on Deflecting Swat is the ability to steal positive effects. What is better than outright countering say Eldrazzi Conscription? Redirecting it to your creature. What it lacks in versaility it makes up for with potential massive upside.
I love how Richard thinks to summoners pact for a rec sage… these guys play the most over-policed commander I’ve ever freaking seen. Anytime anyone gets anything on board they are like “is he the threat” and “we need a board wipe” lmao. Good stuff.
You guys should use polls for these episodes and reveal the poll after you talk about them. Maybe it won’t work for the later parts in the bracket, but it could be a cool tie breaker or just thing to see
That was a ton of fun, great video! I think you could have actually seeded the cards maybe, like listing them by how much they are played on EDHrec and then go 1st vs 16th, 2 vs 15th, etc. This would have mean a lot of sweep on the first round (but these tend to be funny and are not too taxing mentally) and would probably guarantee interesting discourses on pretty much every match-up starting at round 2. Anyway, keep this up, I think this is way more entertaining than the tierlists video!
Not that it'd change the grading, but any land with Island subtype can be discarded to Foil (and Forest subtype for Snag). It isn't just the basic lands Island or Forest.
1:25:55 I think this one is closer than they let on. When I build decks, I'm more likely to cut Force from a blue deck than Pact from a green deck. This is one of those where other formats can taint judgment.
I love this format of doing a bracket for a category of cards. I think I disagree with some of the picks, obviously, but I realized something. There’s not a single pitch card in casual commander that I would play over the 1-2 mana versions of the effect. Any of foil, force of negation, force of will, I would play counterspell over those in a casual deck. Fury is worse than pyroclasm or obliterating bolt, or lightning bolt for that matter. There’s exceptions for niche decks, like blue pitch cards in decks that regularly draw dozens of cards, or snag in my Shigeki deck, but otherwise every pitch card is bad to me.
Y’all are crazy! Commandeer is a 3 for 2. You spend 3 cards and get to counter the card AND take it for yourself. This is a better rate than force of will. The only concern is having enough blue cards to make it work. I think the consideration of casting full price also needs to be included in the ranking of each card
Force of Vigor gets rid of some seriously scary commanders, like Go-Shintai and the enchantment it makes on ETB, or Breya, Etherium Shaper and the artifact it makes on ETB. In a lot of cases I'm more likely to have a green card in hand than a commander on the battlefield, turn 1 blow up mana crypt and sol ring while still having turn 1 mana available for a sol ring seems good
I don't even use primal vigor but it's better than deadly rollick by leagues. Removing altars, mana rocks, rhystic study or stax pieces is much better then killing a creature when there are 1-2 mana kill spells in black
This episode was amazing, relying on Chat GPT as a referee and having it fumble on confusing Snag with Vapor Snag had me crying with laughter. EDIT: I'm 100% with Tomer though, Deflecting Swat in the context of commander is just so much more usable than Force imo, unless you are heavily invested in blue, DS is so much more splashable, fits in any deck with red and doesn't put you down a card when protecting your commander and can even 2 for one an opponent in the process.
As a Nezahal main, commandeer is so cracked. Any counter spell that lets you discard a card, or return islands as cost doesn’t matter when you’re always at 10+ cards in hand haha. Very specific but these decks do exit. Yesterday I was at 39 in hand, tapped out and had more ways to interact than people could really comprehend.
I know Convoke effects technically aren't free, but they FEEL free. Lol. Wand of the Worldsoul for example I think should probably be a must have mana rock in any mono white or deck that has ANY white for that matter. If you want direct dmg out of white that is more effective than Shining Shoal, try out Mirror Strike, Honourable Passage, and so on. Those will deal direct dmg to the source instead of you. Also, Reverse Damage while it doesn't deal dmg, it ABSORBS any one source of damage from an opponent so it could suck up a 50 dmg ping from some bullcrap Niv Mizzet deck and then gives it to you as 50 life gain.
Pre viewing, force of will or fierce guardianship will probably take it. I'm hoping commandeer or deflecting swat take it Dark horse of snuff out, darker horse invigorate.
1:35:10 It's *gotta* be Fierce here. They have the same free-spell restriction. And since they're free, there's less of a timing concern (ie, other counterspells force you to leave mana up, making removal more attractive because you can fire off the removal a turn later).
I personally love Summoner's Pact in Casual just as an extra copy of some Haymakers in the deck. I played it in my Katilda, Dawnhart Prime deck as a tutor for Kyler, Champion of Lambholt, or other big anthem effects.
Ah, the exceedingly rare “Richard is clearly right and everyone else is high on crack” moment. Pact of Negation is _so_ much better than Solitude. Solitude just removes one single creature, and gives you card disadvantage- assuming you even have a white card in hand to exile. Pact of Negation unconditionally protects your game winning play with a straight up hard counter. Almost nothing else in the game does a better job at securing your win. I can’t believe this is even being debated lol.
Time to reset the “Episodes since Swords to Plowshares discourse” counter.
We only went one episode without it because Richard wasn’t on the last episode 😂
Swords answers Tomer's wins, but not Richard's. Tomer sees the value in it because it is a hole in many of his strategies. Richard does not see the value because it is not a hole in many of his strategies. Richard should play it, Tomer should not.
I hope it stays at zero! 😅
And submerge
Good reasoning!@@atle853
This should be the format of your current tier lists. You don't have to do 32 cards each time, something like 16 or 8 going into a randomly seeded bracket with Chat GPT as the tie-breaker would be excellent viewing. Never before have you guys had as animated or heated debate - this was excellent!
Agreed except for the ChatGPT tiebreaker. It's annoying and makes the end result random and unsatisfying. Hopefully next time they can get Phil to jump in or something.
Love this format. I really prefer this to the tier list stuff, at least with discussing more established cards. The tiebreakers are amazing as you guys form into makeshift 2v2s and it gets hilariously intense as chatgpt reads off her relatively random decision. In general, I think some of your best content comes when you're arguing; so attaching an actual win/lose to the argument works well. Really brings out the salt.
I would rather it be the editor as the tiebreaker
I want to see a underplayed card/shark tank bracket now
@danielparrott56 Tomer edits a lot of these so it doesn't exactly work.
Same I love the arguments and banter. There's so many different archetypes and ways to play mtg that it's always interesting to see people's opinions on cards. Definitely has made me rethink the cards I play and try out cards that I thought was "bad".
@@Princeofseancesame, or Phil jumping in. I hated the ChatGPT tiebreaker, makes everything that came before feel irrelevant since it's just a stupid "AI" making a random decision.
Love how you guys always find new formats to keep the convo unique
Watching Seth insist that Obscuring Haze is better than Force of Will is peak comedy
I refuse to believe that force of will is a good card.
@adammorin2955 you don't have to. Doesn't mean the card isn't strong though
@@trehenry413 it’s overrated
And it still is good. One thing does not nulify the other.@@adammorin2955
@@adammorin2955it can be overrated and still better than obscuring haze
So much better than a sinple top10 or tier list. Keep it up!
I feel like this is one all time great episodes of this podcast.
I actually just stole a one ring with a commandeer a few days ago, it led to me making a comeback and winning the game lol
That’s the sexiest thing I’ve heard all day
Didn't expect gush to be missing!
The bracket idea seems like a nice fresh take on the Tier List meta that has been going on for the last years.
The suspense of the chat gpt tiebreakers was amazing 😂
Aint no way subtlety is better than endurance.
With subtlety you temporarily counter your opponent's creature which they'll cast next turn and attack you with it for the rest of the game. Counter your opponent's 6-mana/voltron commander? You're their archenemy. Blink it? The whole table is locked from playing the game and will team up on you.
Endurance has all the upsides Richard said, ON TOP of being free instant speed out of nowhere full wipe gy interaction. There is no better. Keep in mind, it can also protect YOUR gy from exile hate.
I mean subtlety stops a dockside win, thassa oracle, eldrazi, praetors, drannith, grand abolisher, etc etc... so I mean
Subtlety has way more potential impact, Idk I don't like to rate cards on how likely I am to get hate from the person I stopped from winning the game. In casual Subtlety just seems better.
Thanks for your OPINION. The algorithm will remember that.
yes, but what if the GY is irrelevant? Then the card is useless. Subtlety is always going to hit something. That was the flexibility point being made I believe.
@@kennellfrederick4367 Naturally I would agree with you however if I'm using Endurance, I'm using it on myself more so as a way to protect my graveyard when I don't have access to stifle effects. Black is a very prominent color so I think there's a likely chance to hit someone. But like you said not as much as a Subtlety does because no one can be playing graveyard decks but someone will always play strong creatures.
This is literally the best podcast you have done. Please more episodes like this
This was probably the best most entertaining episode you guys have done so far
I appreciate that Crim hates fogs so much, and also is probably the player second only to Phil who would benefit the most from adding them to his deck, considering how often he just ends up with an empty board, having barely any lands, and getting punched every turn for value by Richard's Dowsing Dagger-holder or whatnot.
Well a fog doesnt save you from getting attacked in multiple turns for value
Mana Crypt gets excluded because it’s too good
commander lotus as well I guess.
and Qasali Ambusher
Chatgpt would say otherwise, not versatile enough. Lol
Instants & sorceries
@atle853 but the elementals? Lol
It was so funny tomer losing every single time to chat GPT
Tomer vs chatgpt let's go! Lol
I do wonder if the wording for commander would make a difference on some of them, but not enough to ask myself.
He won on Force of Despair R1, didn't he?
I love how much argument happened over terrible cards. Truly great.
Some of these rounds discussions were hilarious. Props to the contributors for coming into each round with interesting perspectives.
More of this format please!
"I would think Tomer out of all people would have a respect for Commandeer." That is cold as ice, Seth!
I live for this episode. ChatGPT showing up as the tie-breaker brought more chaos to the yard than a poorly-timed Warp World.
I run my copy of Endurance in Tayam because it's less than 3 cmc and can refill my library to keep the combos going
Yes. Taiyam supremacy.
This episode is so good! Haha This is way better then the letter grade ranking episodes. 😂
I think Commandeer is more of a 3 for 2 because not only does your opponent not get their thing, but you get it instead. Kind of like a counter, and theft effect bundled together.
Tier lists: 🥱😴
Brackets: 👌
great podcast...some WILD takes haha
There is something incredibly ironic about Tomer and Crim advocating for a creature that sees almost no play over a card that is "good in cedh." Like, really? Why do you think it might see play in cedh?
Pact is very underrated
1st 2 cards and I'm like oh this'll be easy. No contest. Immediately needed a tie breaker lol
Commandeer is not a "3 for 1". It is a "3 for 2". (Or rather, 1-for-3 and 2-for-3, since the "for" should describe the cost) If it just countered the spell, it would be a 1or-3, but since you get the spell, that's one more card of value for you.
Which actually compares to Force of Will quite nicely.
And really, any spell worth commandeering likely counts for more than 1 card of value. Like, stealing the one ring is technically a 2-for-3 if you free commandeer it, but it quickly pays for itself in terms of cards.
Its main problem is it's very hard to actually have those two blue cards in anything but mono blue. But if you have them, you'll likely find a use for this.
1:17:45 My favorite tomar arguments are when he repeats back Richards argument but with the other card. It's so funny how it works almost every time.
better than tier lists
Would be interesting to hear what chatgpt has to say for each matchup, regardless of the score lol.
Why? It regurgitates the same bs each time and just makes a stupid random decision. I'd much rather have Phil jump in.
I would like to know what it scans to generate a response.
@@LedPESRuleIt is not random. It seems to be reading some popular sites. I would like to know if MTG mechanics are already somehow installed.
yes but I'd like to see a 32 card with ZERO mana (free? no?)
cuz i don't understand your video I though i would see 32 enchants or sorcery spells with ZERO mana cost... this is what i am looking for a good list of ZERO mana cost spells ! not creature spoells with MANA costs , how can these be considered FREE ???? what does FREE mean in MTG?
A little late but I'm with everyone else, fantastic format and episode overall, loved all of it
I love the 10 minutes of arguing in the first rounds just for two cards that have absolutely no chance of moving on again. (Sunscour vs snag)
Submerge is kinda OP. I love it. It basically reads: “unsummon a creature, they can’t play it again this turn, they skip their next draw”.
It blocks their deck too. That is getting undervalued. Putting it at the bottom is also good but they will still have access to the rest of the deck.
Richard: Shining Shoal has potential, you can pitch a four-drop to pick off one of your opponent's creatures.
Also Richard: Swords to Plowshares is a bad card that I cut from all of my white deck.
I love your brews, Richard, but holy moly do some of these takes not compute in my brain.
somehow I knew y'all would miss Massacre, which can situationally outshine all these cards and has a really high floor. You can go back to any commander clash episode and quickly find a spot where a 0 mana drown in sorrow would be a massive blowout. It can be a onesided boardwipe, it's better against fast starts, it's one of the most slept-on EDH power cards.
Love the march madness bracket style format, should do more!
Subtlety is such a terrible card, I actually can't. Endurance is infinitely better. I cannot stress how much I'm team Richard on that one.
Also. Fierce has gotta take the dub right?
Tomer’s logic for Foil also applies to Commandeer, but Commandeer at least gets you a card back
This has been one of the funniest podcast episodes you guys have done, I hope you'll do this again! With ChatGPT too of course!
Yoo chat GTP is fire, you should try it as a special guest on an episode!
A cheeky corner case for Reverent Mantra is it makes auras and equipment fall off creatures too, so it could hose a few specific strategies pretty hard
Are we not gonna talk about the downhill charge, target an opponent's creature? Its worse hatred, but the memes
I use Downhill Charge in Ojer Axonil Storm, once you start to cantrip or play some cheap ping spells with Burgi, or Urabrask, or Storm-Kiln out, you'll have a tapped mountain to sac and just add this onto the end of the stack, it'll resolve 1st making making your 7-8 copies of grapeshot do 10 damage each pretty easily.
Snapback is obviously better at doing controlly blue things than downhill charge, but red is all about being aggressive and speeding up games
good video.. will say a bit telegraphed on the final.. force and guardianship being in two separate halves of the bracket..
There's no way that subtley is better than Endurance lol
The part not mentioned on Deflecting Swat is the ability to steal positive effects. What is better than outright countering say Eldrazzi Conscription? Redirecting it to your creature. What it lacks in versaility it makes up for with potential massive upside.
this was such a fun and funny format for a tier list I was cracking up this whole time
I love how Richard thinks to summoners pact for a rec sage… these guys play the most over-policed commander I’ve ever freaking seen. Anytime anyone gets anything on board they are like “is he the threat” and “we need a board wipe” lmao. Good stuff.
You guys should use polls for these episodes and reveal the poll after you talk about them. Maybe it won’t work for the later parts in the bracket, but it could be a cool tie breaker or just thing to see
The lack of Gush and Git Probe in this list...
That was a ton of fun, great video!
I think you could have actually seeded the cards maybe, like listing them by how much they are played on EDHrec and then go 1st vs 16th, 2 vs 15th, etc. This would have mean a lot of sweep on the first round (but these tend to be funny and are not too taxing mentally) and would probably guarantee interesting discourses on pretty much every match-up starting at round 2.
Anyway, keep this up, I think this is way more entertaining than the tierlists video!
Not that it'd change the grading, but any land with Island subtype can be discarded to Foil (and Forest subtype for Snag).
It isn't just the basic lands Island or Forest.
I'm glad we ended up with the finals match-up that we did. These were the 2 that popped into mind when I saw the title of this video.
1:25:55 I think this one is closer than they let on. When I build decks, I'm more likely to cut Force from a blue deck than Pact from a green deck. This is one of those where other formats can taint judgment.
I love this format of doing a bracket for a category of cards. I think I disagree with some of the picks, obviously, but I realized something. There’s not a single pitch card in casual commander that I would play over the 1-2 mana versions of the effect. Any of foil, force of negation, force of will, I would play counterspell over those in a casual deck. Fury is worse than pyroclasm or obliterating bolt, or lightning bolt for that matter. There’s exceptions for niche decks, like blue pitch cards in decks that regularly draw dozens of cards, or snag in my Shigeki deck, but otherwise every pitch card is bad to me.
This is very entertaining. I love how ChatGPT comes in and pours more salt on the discussion :)
Im surprised no one brought up the fact you can commander a force of dispair 😂😂😂😂lol ❤❤❤
I love listening to you guys. Even though I don't even really play the game I love this podcast so much. Richard is so funny
Having Chat GPT as unbiased guest is so funny XD
This was a great format! Everyone saying "oh this is an easy matchup" before vehemently disagreeing is hilarious.
Next subject: full art basic land art for each color! Please make it happen! Lol and please include chatgpt as a permanent member!
I really like that you keep trying new formats!
Submerge is so good, I play it in cEDH and even play yavimaya to turn it on in greenless matchups
There's 32 free spells? Time to build a five color free spells deck I guess
Y’all are crazy! Commandeer is a 3 for 2. You spend 3 cards and get to counter the card AND take it for yourself. This is a better rate than force of will. The only concern is having enough blue cards to make it work. I think the consideration of casting full price also needs to be included in the ranking of each card
I absolutely love this format, loved the battles.
Force of Vigor gets rid of some seriously scary commanders, like Go-Shintai and the enchantment it makes on ETB, or Breya, Etherium Shaper and the artifact it makes on ETB.
In a lot of cases I'm more likely to have a green card in hand than a commander on the battlefield, turn 1 blow up mana crypt and sol ring while still having turn 1 mana available for a sol ring seems good
Phew this was a very spicy 🌶️ episode. Loved every second of it!
Way better than the 100th tier list video. But you should have told ChatGPT you meant Commander initially
You can summoners pact for subtlety, it’s gotta be better! 😂
Except it can't.....
Love Seths defence of Snag over Sunscour. It's so medium 😆
I'm dying at Seth smugly agreeing with ChatGPT on the "Snag" call XD
I don't even use primal vigor but it's better than deadly rollick by leagues. Removing altars, mana rocks, rhystic study or stax pieces is much better then killing a creature when there are 1-2 mana kill spells in black
This episode was amazing, relying on Chat GPT as a referee and having it fumble on confusing Snag with Vapor Snag had me crying with laughter.
EDIT: I'm 100% with Tomer though, Deflecting Swat in the context of commander is just so much more usable than Force imo, unless you are heavily invested in blue, DS is so much more splashable, fits in any deck with red and doesn't put you down a card when protecting your commander and can even 2 for one an opponent in the process.
As a Nezahal main, commandeer is so cracked. Any counter spell that lets you discard a card, or return islands as cost doesn’t matter when you’re always at 10+ cards in hand haha. Very specific but these decks do exit. Yesterday I was at 39 in hand, tapped out and had more ways to interact than people could really comprehend.
I think Summoner’s Pact is being overestimated because it puts a green creature in your hand, as opposed to on the battlefield.
i think in future this needs to be specified cedh or casual. that argument came up a lot and its a totally different conversation
Now that Eluge from Bloomburrow came out, it's gotta be time warp.
This was so entertaining, please do this format again!
I really liked this format! Please do it more often!
The chatgpt tie breaker was hilarious if not...well thought out
I know Convoke effects technically aren't free, but they FEEL free. Lol. Wand of the Worldsoul for example I think should probably be a must have mana rock in any mono white or deck that has ANY white for that matter.
If you want direct dmg out of white that is more effective than Shining Shoal, try out Mirror Strike, Honourable Passage, and so on. Those will deal direct dmg to the source instead of you. Also, Reverse Damage while it doesn't deal dmg, it ABSORBS any one source of damage from an opponent so it could suck up a 50 dmg ping from some bullcrap Niv Mizzet deck and then gives it to you as 50 life gain.
Great format, would love to see more card tournaments.
The AI adding contention to the group is entertaining.
Could pit commanders against eachother, or Timmy cards in different colours.
ChatGPT is clearly a Legacy head and is tired of everyone assuming that Commander is the only format.
Pre viewing, force of will or fierce guardianship will probably take it.
I'm hoping commandeer or deflecting swat take it
Dark horse of snuff out, darker horse invigorate.
1:35:10 It's *gotta* be Fierce here. They have the same free-spell restriction. And since they're free, there's less of a timing concern (ie, other counterspells force you to leave mana up, making removal more attractive because you can fire off the removal a turn later).
"you can play around deadly rollick" sounds like you're a freaking psychic... how the heck am I supposed to play around that and kill your commander?
I personally love Summoner's Pact in Casual just as an extra copy of some Haymakers in the deck. I played it in my Katilda, Dawnhart Prime deck as a tutor for Kyler, Champion of Lambholt, or other big anthem effects.
The Brady references right before football season lets go!
1:01:32 - Black is the most popular commander color
Foil is discard rather than exile. I think that’s pretty neat
This episode was a blast!!!
Richards take of force of despair was shocking 😮
Podcast: creatures are the biggest threats
Also podcast: counter target non-creature spell is stronger than counter target spell
My thinking on foil is that it maybe could be good in a dimir reanimator strategy. Discard vs exile is a pretty big difference in that case.
Ah, the exceedingly rare “Richard is clearly right and everyone else is high on crack” moment. Pact of Negation is _so_ much better than Solitude. Solitude just removes one single creature, and gives you card disadvantage- assuming you even have a white card in hand to exile.
Pact of Negation unconditionally protects your game winning play with a straight up hard counter. Almost nothing else in the game does a better job at securing your win. I can’t believe this is even being debated lol.
Brilliant format
I loved the bracket format. Would love to see more!