Naval Legends: Tambovskiy Komsomolets | World of Warships
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- 📖 Historical ships in the game 👉 wo.ws/3kAwWlZ
🔔 / @worldofwarshipsoffici...
In the new episode, we're going to tell you about Soviet and Russian missile boat Tambovskiy Komsomolets.
In the 1980s, the Soviet Navy was reinforced with the R-47 missile boat, also known as Tambovskiy Komsomolets.
Her supersonic anti-ship missiles could easily destroy a battleship. Today, Tambovskiy Komsomolets is a museum ship moored in a permanent berth at Kronstadt, but almost twenty ships of this project are still serving in the Russian Navy.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @worldofwarshipsoffici...
⚓⚓⚓
Keep an eye out on the official World of Warships website: wo.ws/website
Follow us on
/ worldofwarshipscom
/ discord
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
4:59 ah yes 1,600 miles. The famous intercontinental sailing range of 12,000 kilometers.
and thats while using diesel engines at snail speed. Use the turbines... and its 250+ miles till you are out of gas.
Ah yes, let's ignore the important ships in history. As you ignore the playerbase
Bravo. I'm clapping here right now. Bravo.
Still waiting on HMS Warspite.
Give us the Grand Old Lady
So any random coastal defense boat can be considered a naval legend now?
PT-109 when?
Only if its -russian- soviet :D
The whole scenarios was like IJN imaging USN strategy and convincing itself the battle can be won all over again.
My favorite part was when they brag about how it could "totally sink an Iowa class" in a scenario, that they immediately admit would never actually happen. Genius.
Theoretically it could but it would never happen
It will be badly damaged but not sunked.
That's russian propaganda for yall
@@HouseOfNishizumi even the US, China, Israel have military propaganda
Russians always overestimate their technology and abilities.
The soviet navy was the best since Petropavlovsk discovered India in 1492
Don't forget when the Soviet battleship SinOP sunk both Bismarck & Tirpitz in 1942, and a shell from battleship Vladivostok hit Hitler in the head, ending the war
This hilariously $hit@ss comment I ever seen
Next of Naval Legends: Dimitri’s fishing boat.
Edit:
This would be like bragging about how a World War 2 era U-Boat could sink HMS Dreadnought, only in this case the U-Boat utterly fails to do so.
Ok. First of all: these kind of ships are pretty cool and quite capable in modern navies.
That being said, there is nothing legendary about it. This is "Naval Legends", a series where you showcase vessels that are or were relevant in naval history or had a tangible story that made them "legends" in popular culture or for naval enthusiasts.
This ship could have been part of a separe video series called "sea warriors of the world" or someting like that and everyone would have been cool with it.
You have to face it people. The only russian ships that I can remember from the top of my mind that could be considered "Naval Legends" are the soviet BBs of the Marat-class. They played a roll in the coastal defenses of cities like Leningrad in WWII.
Alsl the Aurora because it wasa ship that participated in the famous battle of Tsushima. That ship is famous as well for being the place where the russian revolution started.
I'm sure there arw some other ships mainly from early 20th century that can be considered "Naval Legends" by their own right.
Now that I think about it, you wanna make a video about modern legendary russian ships? Make a video about the Kirov-class cruisers (the gun ships of WWII) and compare them with the Kirov-class nuclear battlecruisers that russia still have today.
Stop making "Naval Legends" videos about ships that do not have a story or a background historically important enough to qualify as "Naval Legends"
Thank you.
This was literally like a high school propaganda project about a ship that did absolutely nothing of note during it's service.
Because there Electronics were crap. Most of the time they would never even turn the crap on as the Elec. would catch fire giving off toxic fumes that left the crew infertile for yrs and producing birth defects for generations!! I.E. this film!!! LOL
Do uss enterprise it is one of the most decorated ships ever
I was thinking about USS Missouri
That’s called Battle 360
@@Powerhaus88 I don’t agree with them doing such unknown ships as naval legends but if you want a naval legends: Enterprise you might as well watch battle 360 given it’s 10 60 minute episodes on Enterprise’s service career and the pacific war. Idk how condensed they could have it for naval legends here, but you can’t really beat that anyway.
@@Mohandar881 It depends on the country which ship is the most famous one. In germany Bismarck is the most famous ship , in the US it's Enterprise etc.
@@sovietheart3883 That doesn't change the fact whatever Naval Legends video they could possibly do would still fall short of Battle 360, a documentary series literally focused on the ship that runs for 10 60 minute episodes.
I thought this series was about naval legends and not some random missile boat, that was built 30 years after the period you are focusing on, and did absolutely nothing. Plus none of your claims make any sense.
They make sense if you ignore the upgrades the Iowas had installed after WW2. If they didn't have CIWS and their ECM suits, yes, maybe these trashy boats could have sunk them. This video basically admits that the Soviet Union couldn't afford a ship that'd actually pose a threat to a 45 year old completely outdated ship.
@@DJVC1985 In the Cold war, the Soviet missile barrage is a real threat.... if they can get into the range to fire that is. Fighting in open sea, Soviet force gonna lose due to they lack control of the sky aka lack of range both detection, tracking and firing range, in defensive of Soviet shore line will be more suited and that what Soviet design. They knew their can't directly fight Western fleet in open battle.
@@DOSFS Soviets couldn't stand a chance from Westerns, since US ij Sea Combat is not only their Primary Role, its tecnically an Air Combat which they did do
@@DJVC1985 US has better Techs since they join in WWII, while Soviets is still Lacks in Techs since Communism Propaganda, so its a down grade for themselves to build Warships, their Project only ended up in Paper Blueprints just imagining in their Fantasy minds that can destroy those Ships in US, UK, Germany, Italy and Japan
In case you wonder what the Cyrillic text in the video means:
1:00 "Danger. Lids open automatically"
2:01 "Leningrad" (on the shirt)
5:07 "Sailing the Baltic Sea" (the highlighted book left)
5:09 "Laurent´s tables of the North-East Atlantic" (the highlighted book on the right)
5:12 "PRAVDA"-newspaper (Pravda means Thruth) on the table, and the map on the wall is titled "Combat activities of patrol units 1941-45"
5:15 the map is titled "From Cape Taran to the Port of Ustk"
6:08 "Missile ready" plate upper left corner
"Ready to fire" plate upper corner right
on the round switch:
left "Turned off"
right "ready to launch"
6:13 the switches on the right, upper to lower:
"DC voltage control"
"Voltage 400Hz"
"Voltage 50Hz"
the switches in the row next to it:
"Management selection" (maybe "chose the control-type"? not sure)
"Selection"
"Selection off"
6:15 "Start" (aka "Launch missile"), the button next to it is "Unblock"
upper left says "Degrees"
6:28 "Tambovskiy Komsomolets" on the hull (you guessed it, I guess ^^ )
7:14 again, "Danger. Lids open automatically"
7:30 the inscriptions on the officer´s uniform:
left: "Armed Forces of Russia"
right: "Skorochkin D.K."
(the white box on the wall behind him basically warns "Danger, high voltage")
8:52 the round lid on the rocket´s nose: "Alignment of T.G.S" (I don´t know what TGS is)
10:30 this thing is a "lead calculator" for fire-control
the gauge upper left says "Heading angle", upper right "Distance in KM", between them "Kondenzor-218"
The red plate says: "Warning! In the setting AU in position GN immediately release knuppel and button"
15:54 Control panel for the main engines, propulsion. The gauges are titled "Rotation frequency (RPM)", "Propeller shaft speed", "Forward/Back" etc
15:58 "rudder left - rudder right"
16:30 the green text says "EXIT"
Feel free to add or correct!
Comment needs to be pinned.
TYSM! :D
I like how this bearded guy conveniently forgot that Iowas after refit were also equipped with Harpoon missiles, which would be a perfect weapon against ships like proj. 12411.
Harpoons were developed 1977 not deployed until years later besides they were subsonic moskis were 2.8 mach.
Nice comedy skit WG, had me laughing throughout.
Actually I was a little offended and the gross inaccuracies. The US didn't get anti-ship missiles till the mid 1970's.... WHAT?!
My shitty missile boat will now sink an Iowa class BB through the POWER OF NATIONALISM!!
Missiles can't penetrate battleships armor like Bismarck and Iowa and yamato classes
@@bakrs5417 U forgot the thin deck
@@quangtruongle7823 AA Guns will solve the Problem, even CIWs is exist
We're literally into propaganda territory at this point. A shitty 500 tons Projekt 12411 missile boat commissioned in 1987 (truly inside this game's timeframe) becoming a nAvAl LeGeNd. Disgusting.
?????? Missile boats in general played important role in development of naval warfare. Really do not see games timeframe as important reason to limit series only on WW2. Not to add that whit hole COVID situation it is questionable how much they could do outside of Russia.
@@aleksaradojicic8114 How the fuck did you go from talking about world war 2 warships to Covid?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Extra salty for no reason at all, are we?
@@RsPker141 Easy. People ask why they dont make this about some international ship. Simple example is COVID and all limitations whit travel that is brought.
Second, I do not think that game timeframe focus on WW2 is reason why we should not see naval legend episode about ships before and after that timeframe now and in the future.
@@Powerhaus88 Except they ideally want to have real footage of ship if possible. So COVID reason is not nonsense.
I am waiting for the legend to show up.
Ah, yes, exactly the kind of naval legend I'd expect Wargaming to cover for their game about WW1 and WW2-era ships: a 1987 500-ton missile boat that did absolutely nothing of note. Meanwhile, actual naval legends like HMS Warspite or USS Enterprise have yet to be covered.
Wishful thinking on the part of the Russians concerning the vulnerability of an Iowa-class battleship and the effectiveness of its defenses. Also, the refitted Iowas carried Harpoon anti-ship missiles in addition to its Tomahawks. The Harpoon can kill a Tarantul quite easily with one or two hits.
A near miss by a Harpoon would be enough to gut the overgrown fishing boat. Same can't be said the other way.
The 2 lethal moskit missiles can kill a easy target like the biggest Iowa right away..➡️🚀🚀➡️🔥➡️🤫➡️😁
@@humbertochong9094 LOL, no, not unless it's carrying it's nuclear warhead.
@@humbertochong9094 Easy Target?
*Laughs in Iowa's CIWS*
@@HansHeisenberg obvious..? because this can't of missiles...➡️🤫➡️😆😆😆😆➡️ difficult to destroy a P-270 moskit. ..➡️😭➡️😆😆😆
The Propaganda Department is pleased with your contribution comrades. Comrade Stalin smiles upon your definitely not biased and full of shit film of a speed boat that did nothing to deserve the term Legend on the level of the Iowa, Essex and Yamato classes.
It is such a cool looking ship. Russian version of old PT boat from USN during WW2.
Germany gifted a tarantul to USN after east germany fell... on display as museum ship.. I believe in Fall river, Mass.
Yes, that is true. I went to see it this last summer. It is not in very good shape and was closed. I was very disappointed as it was the main reason for going
The comment section is just going savage i mean SAVAGEEEEEE
It is called projection. The USN couldn't produce a comparable missile boat because engineers couldn't design one like they cannot produce a viable hypersonic missile today😅
The age of Battleships is coming back oddly. With it getting easier and easier to counter torpedos and missiles, it won't be long and it will be near impossible to get through a ships anti missile or torpedo defenses. And the one thing you can't counter is a 16" shell smacking into your boat, rocking the whole crew.
Maybe not battleships. I think some sort of heavy / large / battlecruisers just because of economic reasons. We don't make thicc boi armor, guns, and ammunition anymore. As for the guns, maybe we'll have either railguns or a naval version of the 1000 mile cannon the US Army is developing, possibly fitted out with an autoloader. Maybe a 2 foward turrets (twin, maybe triple) and vertical missile launchers and a helicopter hangar where 2 aft turrets should be? Maybe add an unbelievable amount of anti air and ciws.
the later version of the ship, for Vietnam, built in Vietnam, boasts 16 Harpoonski, look sturdy, my fav looking missile corvette
"Naval Legend"
Edit: this video is near propaganda. The bit about how they wouldn't engage a missile boat with a tomahawk because it's expensive is utter nonsense. If the battleship was at stake they wouldn't hesitate the use such a missile as it's cost is irrelevant compared to the ship.
This was exactly what I was thinking
Could’ve done literally any other ship from your freaking game but nooooo
It’s so funny how confident they are about how this missile can hit the battleships, as if ECM wasn’t existing
Or CIWS for the retrofitted Iowas
British also had AA systems and ECMs on there ships during Falkland war, but missiles still hit and sunk there warships. ECM and AA are not 100% effective systems like anything IRL.
Especially since most tarantul II and Tarantul I variants only carry the subsonic SSN2 Styx rather than the overhyped Moskit, but hey, Wargaming might be obligated to blow their neo soviet leaders through propaganda. Don't get me wrong, i don't have problems with them covering more modern ships in these videos, but this particular video seems.... suspicious, especially considering the Geopolitical realities (which we should avoid talking about )
@@Powerhaus88 Yeah and generalizations prove anything. Except they dont, but keep leaving in your beautiful closed world.
@@Powerhaus88 ever wonder why the Soviet’s deployed so many missile systems on a variety of platforms? It’s because they had no idea of any of them worked 😂
Naval Legend - Sovetsky Soyuz took the time to point out how their battleship would dunk on the Germans. I guess its the American's turn to feel the might of Soviet power fantasy.
they do however go to a great length to try and make the soyuz come across as better then iowa if it was built
Nah, most Soviets ships are Whack, it easy to broke down after getting a shot from enemy ships, the USS Iowa and IJN Yamato has big Advantage to run down and can penentrate those weak armors from Soyuz, since that ship is Big and not Strong to destroy other Battleships, maybe the Littorio and Bismarck can stand a chance if they manage to destroy
Next April Fools day is not here yet.
Why does it say the range is 1600 miles and the map makes it look like 10000 miles? It's an interesting video about a ship most people have no idea even existed but stuff like this puts all the information in question.
its russian miles..... they just make them up
Comparing 1980 ships to Battleships straight from WW2
This whole fucking vid feels like some kind of a propaganda about Soviet Navy
it is
The comparison is even further bollocks by saying the Iowa would be sunk easily like they got nothing added to them as naval technology developed 😂😂😂
They werent even 1980 ships... They were early designes from the 60s, no automatic gun control, problems with the superstructure cracking and so on.
Well, I am sure that comparison at the beginning is going to spark a healthy and polite comments section!
11:48 - they are forgetting that the battleship (like aircraft carriers) don’t travel alone.
they not forgetting it bruh
They still mentioned it in 15:03
You are not paying attention. They spoke to that. Good thing they didn't go it alone!
In today's Naval Legends: Komsomo... Abandon ship! Japanese torpedo boats!
If they put this 1950s ship in the game. I also want submarines with nuclear warheads so I can end the whole game in the first 30 sec. TY WG
That’s a weird way to spell “Enterprise,” WG.
don't you dare put this in the game.
instead of putting out this dumb video can you release a full italian tech tree. At least they had a navy in ww2 unlike the soviets
Its now fish apartment.
Half the time these missile launching ships failed with missiles getting stuck in the tubes or not even going off all together also they had severe buoyancy issues and could not handle high seas at best and intercoastal patrol vessel
Oh? That sounds amusing to read about. Any link or location for stories/pictures of that happening? a giant ASW missile anemically half flopped out of its tube sounds like great meme material
@@CaptainCoffee37he's talking out of his arse.
It's just an insult to the community at this point. We are interested in historic warships, we expect famous names. We get a propaganda piece glorifiying the Soviet Navy's "potential" strike capacity on said historic and famous WW2 war ships. You might not be able to travel the world in this Corona-virus situation but bloody hell you don't have to for the Warspite, you cannot visit it anyways. Disappointed again.
I concur with the above comment. Now, shall we order pizza?
Hear hear!
Mimimi much?
It's now fish apartment
Hey WeeGee, why not add a new Game called "World of Modern Warships" and separated those Soviet ships from WWII and put it in Cold War, So people don't disappointed, its kinda Hard working on your Work, but gonna End up like that
Nice video on history but your attack on one battleship is a little wrong. Won't the BB pop chaff and what about the phalanx missile system?
American Iowa class long ago mothballed but tarantul still around.
What is so fucking legendary about a puny little missile boat?
Cheap , reliable and packs a hell of a punch for a corvette, more capable than The LCS classes lmao
Great to see a sneak peak on the upcoming missile ship soviet tech tree
Next. Naval legends: nigerian gun boat with a pkm on it Hull number "WE don't know because it's just a kayak with a machine gun, so 27362". "Of course it was ahead of it's Time and could sunk an Iowa class battleship with ease"-admiral balensnakov After drinking half a crate of vodka bottle
Why are we constanly getting Russian ships that will A never be in game and B no one knows about and you are calling them Legends? Can we stick with ships that acutlly did stuff please?
good point
Yep i agree whit you this ship did nothing to be call a legend
Come on, you know why.
Because they are cherished deeply within the hearts and minds of the Russian people
I don’t think you could call something a “Legend” if barely anyone ever heard about it, this is the second one in a row now already. I don’t know how this thing could be a legend without ever really doing anything other than being a missile boat from the soviets.
An then FDR came and destroyed each of the missile boats without losing a single dive bomber! What? It didn’t happen? Oh just like this entire video shouldn’t happen..
half of the video is how a 127 mm penetration rocket could pen the armor of a battleship
This fishing boat Try To Face An Iowa Class Battleship? Must Be A Joke
The Iowa class easy target ➡️🎯 ➡️🚀🚀➡️🔥
@@humbertochong9094 Ever heard Anti Air Guns? That will Work even its not a Plane they will shoot those Rockets, if those Crews manage it to destroy advance
@Humberto Chong Those peashooters for missiles can never penetrate anything on an Iowa.
@@whyyoumadbro2370 Really..? According to Who..?? ➡️🤫➡️😆😆
@@HansHeisenberg Is not a Rocket ..➡️ 🤫➡️ Anti- Ship missile...➡️😆😆😆😆➡️🧠➡️🦟
I wonder how long it will take until the comments get disabled on this one xD
You're such a joke WeeGee
This is about as blatant propaganda as I've ever seen.
Its 1 rusdian ship u americans got 20 javal legends but its propaganda to talk about other ships stfu. Keep it aboit warsbips
Why are they featuring this in the first place? If there is game that should feature this missile boat, it should be Eugen Wargame Red Dragon, not WoWs. Or is WG implying something about T10 not being top tier?
Even if this ship doesnt belong to wwii era, i like the video a lot, good joob.
Can we get Pyotr Veliky or Admiral Kuznetzov? I already know the answer is no since they are still in service.😂
So you made a video about some shitty tugboat which did nothing but could have totally defeated a US BB from 40 years ago in a simulation (but didn't) and call it a "naval legend". All the while there is still no video about the actually legendary HMS Warspite years after it was added to the game? Also at least spell check your videos...
You sound like you have been insulted... here are the facts the Iowa class could not have defended themselves from a swarm of mach 2.8 moskits they would have been disabled if not sunk.
The propaganda fumes must be really stronk at WG HQ. Next on Naval Legends, Andropov's fishing boat...
I have a question, why do they keep referring to CIWS (Close In Weapon System) as Anti Aircraft Defenses/Artillery? Nit pick aside I would love to see a video on that Sovremmeny-class DDG that was sitting beside the Missile boat. Also so we are just going to ignore the RGM-84 Harpoon that was also fitted to the Iowa-class? Now i like learning about modern hulls from different navies but the ammount of hand waiving in the video was a little too noticable. While yes a massed attack would sink any ship regardless of her class/size/protection, no admiral worth his/her stars is going to sail a High value Unit into the teeth of the enemy without a sufficient escort. Anyway, hoping for a video of the Sovremmeny-class DDG, The Slava-class CG, and the largest Surface Combatant afloat today (BAR NONE) The Kirov-class Battlecruiser. Now if you want an actual titan that could get into a tussle with a Battleship, Kirov-class or bust.
"largest Surface Combatant afloat today (BAR NONE)The Kirov-class Battlecruiser." - yeah, they better hurry, since maybe one is operational and the rest are in various states of disrepair. If there's something legendary about them, it's the frequency by which their names have been changed.
@@tumppu1975 That doesn't take anything away from the fact. You don't want to be anything smaller than a supercarrier whenever a Kirov decides to take a bad day out on your fleet.
@@wanderingspacenomad9975 it brings nothing either. It's just a pointless flustering of a craft in a navy people do not care about.
@@tumppu1975 You do not count as everyone. Because you don't care about the Russian Navy doesn't mean that the other camp of the argument is empty.
@@tumppu1975what people are you referring to?
Great, a ship that never played ANY role in history and/or combat. STOP THE VODKA intake and the BLATANT RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA. Its getting SERIOUSLY ABSURD!
Once again, Russian propaganda makes its way into these videos. Modern anti-ship missiles have been equated in terms of firepower to that of an 8 inch (203mm) naval rifle. An Iowa class BB was designed from the outset to withstand hits from 16 inch (406mm) naval rifles.the notion that a single Sunburn missile could take out an Iowa (or at the very least disable it) by hitting certain parts of the ship is absolutely ludicrous! Furthermore, you downplay the abilities of the Phalanx CIWS system, and by extension, the missile defenses of an Iowa as a whole. First off, as stated, each Iowa would be escorted by air defense ships at the very least. U.S. Navy doctrine regarding the Iowa’s was if they weren’t part of a carrier battle group, they were escorted by 2 air defense ships and one anti-submarine ship (and what’s with using F-15 Eagles and WW II configured Essex class carriers to represent a carrier battle group?! Please use proper representations!). Second, each Iowa was outfitted with 4 Phalanx, multiple decoy launchers, and the SLQ-32 electronic warfare system for defense (there were plans in place to install 2 octuple Sea Sparrow launchers in the mid-90’s but obviously this never happened so consider this a side note). Furthermore, the minimum detection range of low flying aircraft and cruise missiles was between 18 miles (30 km) to 56 miles (90 km). Good luck in hitting them in the first place! Also, the Iowa’s were equipped with Harpoon anti-ship missiles, not just Tomahawks.
16 inches is 406mm
@@DirectorBird whoops, thx. Wrote this while still waking up, lol
Would it withstand penetrations from 16", or even 8", shells?
@@jevinliu4658 yes and yes. With technicality exceptions for the Lexington class battlecruiser and the North Carolina class battleship, all American armored warships stuck like glue to the rule of thumb of being able to withstand hits from their own weapons
@@lightspeedvictory You don't have any idea. The Iowa can be penetrated by 8" guns at close range, so by your logic this missile can penetrate it at any distance.
You guys turned "Naval Legends" into almost as big of a joke as acting like your dev's understand their own game.
Bravo, good sir. Bravo. You have won the internet for today. Congrats. 07
Who cares about a 1980s missile boat??
Where is the video on USS Enterprise? Missouri? Warspite???? We don't need this propaganda.
Add to that its a 17 minute video which is longer than the one they did for Yamato and Bismarck. Ships that actually existed and had historical relevance!!
YEAHH
And now I defend the video...these boats did exist too just like Warspite. The End. That's all I got to defend this. No glorious victory. No actual battle against the odds.Not even a single boat that did something noteworthy individually.
They exist...The End.
(Wait...I was defending this "Naval Legend" right? Guess I can't other than a little nod to their existence)
@@matthewfinkenbinder5846 It existed but I'm referring to the other Soviet fantasy ships like Kremlin or Soyuz where Soyuz gets a longer video than the legendary Bismarck a ship that never existed gets a longer video than the legendary Bismarck..
@@justtheaesome6058 very true...was just pointing out that was literally the only defense for this video I could find.
mein altes gedientes Projekt 1241 ( Molnja ) , als Funkmeß-Waffenleit ausgebildeter . Suuuper !!!
Poor quality ship
🐏💩Ты😂@@lydioconception3470
A missile ship. *Nice.*
Most of modern clash in the missile era always have these small bugger btw. :)
Although people might be partially right about this not being worthy for Naval Legends, I still think this is an enjoyable and well done video about an interisting kind of ship.
can u upload video about kirov battlecruiser
why are they showing missile botes now, i dont like where this is going...
Служил и на 205м и на 1241 для своего времени хорошие корабли были
That "mass launch" strategy is really effective in Wargame Red Dragon, just grab some missile boats, sneak up from behind an island, and fire all of the Moskits. The CIWS totally got overwhelmed
Anyway most feared ship in Red Dragon is Sovremenny
this ship will be in the game after wg out of ww2 paper ship
Next up on Naval Legends! Putin's absolutely defenceless yacht
dont tell me your gonna add this in the game
That's exactly what I was thinking. They mentioned before that they were thinking about adding frigates, I pray that they don't
They can make such destroyers that has only 2 guns but can fire rockets (like those midway rocket planes) at a target but randomly. They won’t target a ship exactly but an area, same thing as Dutch cruisers with their Airstrike.
@@SebaX92 let's just add kamikaze boats, you run up to a ship and hit the self destruct button
I'm sure that would really make the game fun and enjoyable
@@time4anewsystem452 ordering schnellboats consumable ( those boats that were in Dunkirk operation) that would be crazy idea, they would launch some random torps and run away.
@@SebaX92 a what do you mean by consumable? These boats were shown attacking a Iowa Class, which is fitted with anti air missiles and cruise missiles
Guys guess what! The Russian ship for the 80s can beat a US ship built in the 40s
Butthurt much?
@@liscbezkozery3705 what? About the propaganda? Or the fact that this video has nothing to do with “naval legends”
Krigsmarine shits are not legends, they are pathetic. This series is about various units, not only boring, overhyped ones
@@liscbezkozery3705 shill harder. You get an extra ration of vodka, tovarisch.
@@JohnSmith-qp7xu Gladly. Pour brother :D
Is this from the man in the high castle?
Yes, the USA would not fire a missile back at the USSR ships because missiles are expensive. Meanwhile the Russian missile would "Most probably easily" hit the WW2 era US ship. This video is pure Soviet Propaganda. What absolute BS.
What's the cost of a tomahawk or harpoon to the value of a battleship and the thousands of lives onboard? Totally fictitious scenario they have conjured up to blow smoke up their own arses.
Yknow i agree this isnt a naval legend and all but this is still fairly entertaining to learn about, boats or ships of any type legendary or not are still neat all the technology amd planning that went into them but then again people will aways find something to complain about
...because we're afraid they might do something drastic and destroy WoWS.
@@auturgicflosculator2183 you're being overdramatic, the likelyhood of them adding this shit is low if they were truly going to add it then why didn't they add that cold war era destroyer they did a video on ages ago
@@Klimotine Not overly so, and no particular drama involved. I watched another dev crush WoT to the point where I uninstalled it quite permanently. I have a tad more trust in the WoWS team, but a little doubt is only natural.
@@Klimotine They already inside the game,any 1947-1990 is cold war era vessel or stalin wet dream *coff coff carriers coff coff*
@@Klimotine Try compare WWII ships to Cold War ships, and see the difference, basically those ships from WWII is literally most famous and known ships than in Cold War and those ships aren't Legend Ones, its just a Coastal Defense Ships from their Sea Bay
New Jersey: so anyways... I started firing my own missiles!
"The missile could easily penetrate the side armor of the battleship"
"The missile can penetrate 127mm of steel armor"
Gee whiz, if only there was a website to check if Iowa has 127mm or more of side armor? There's gotta be something....Woogle? Bikipedia? I'm sure the name will come to me.
Anyway nice fantasy. All the dreaming in the world will never make your ww2 Soviet navy come true.
Won't matter Americans couldn't afford them anyway and mothballed them😂
Oh Masya Allah ! I never notice that World Of Warships will make a video about this small missile boat. In some warship games, this ship has the fastest vessel ever that build.
😆 fastest vessel ever built? Maybe if you put it on top of an exploding nuclear weapon, but certainly not while running on it's own power. I'm thinking this might be a case of translation gone wrong?
now the only question is whether this ship is coming into the game as an auction ship...minimum bid - 1000000 doubloons?
Im here just to leave my dislike to this propaganda :)
Like anybody cares about YOU.
Nice propaganda video for the Kremlin you made here WG. 😅
But this video is "probably easily" as tone deaf to its intended target audience as WG is to its player base. Kinda impressive actually.
can you do the next naval legend as the hms hood
bruh he already did it
Coming soon to WOWS
Legend.. Pfft.. give me strength.
It makes them feel good, this is why its called a game.
Who is them?
Wil this type of ship be coming to world of warship legends for consoles
I enjoy the education, but can you please leave missiles out of the game! If we want missiles we would play War Thunder
Which it seems like your tuning WOT into War Thunder to attract more players when the real issue is the adjustment of vehicles turned many away or should I say off, lol
No one outside of Eastern Europe has heard of Tambovskiy Komsomolets. It never challenged an American battleship. What's going on with the propaganda?
As a guy from Ukraine I can assure you that it's highly unlikely anyone in Eastern Europe heard about this ship either lol
Lol how many of these things have been blow to pieces in the various Persian Gulf conflicts?
Don't know if any at all.
So... when will we listen to our userbase?
Tarantuls... it was so easy to sink them in the old HArpoon game. They had no working AA (and by this i mean they were basically shooting fireworks) not even able to destroy a single Harpoon.
What fresh hell is this ? Are we getting 80's missile boats next?
Considering that today is russian navy day and that they alienated their non russian player base it makes sense that the only thing they are doing right now is sucking up to their only remaining player base, russian server...
david knows how to detonate a human? damn
Pls, tell us when Submarines are coming in World Of Warships(WOW)?
Aw one of the famous DUST ships
More pathetic then the trailer! WG you have put the bar below ground and still find a way to go lower!
Why are you so biased I as an American did not find anything not factual could you?
i think thats the boat my country syria has at the begining with the missiles, also i think they have a slightly bigger one not 100 sure.
update 10.8 miSsiLe BoaTs aRe CoMing tO wOrld oF WaesHiPs
concealment : 5m
range : 100km
speed : 60 knots
consumables : radar, hydro, repair party, smoke
price: 10000-20000 doubloons
*wg removes them after 3 days*