This video was really really amazing and informative, and the editing in the background for clarification was awesome, i mean all of your videos are high quality, but this one is special, good job team (y) .
a very old one though. not used anymore. might as well start using thou(not the unit obviously) again xD. Though it is quite weird people just decided they don't need a singular word for that anymore.
I'm glad that you explained Dynamic Contrast Ratio and its different forms, because I had been told in the past that these contrast ratio measurements have been just purely arbitrary from brand to brand, but this makes a ton more sense.
The main reason i watch so many of yalls videos is because of 5:20. I have learned a lot because of your videos which i appreciate a lot, but also the way you are with your kids is awesome. Kepp it up LMG!
"Infinite contrast" makes sense to me. The reason why some number divided by 0 is undefined is because as you approach 0 from the left (negative) side, the limit of some number / x is negative infinity; but, as you approach 0 from the right (positive) side, it's positive infinity. Because the limits aren't equal, it's undefined. But in the world of contrast ratios, aren't you really only approaching 0 from the positive side? You can't really have a negative brightness anyway. Hence, infinite contrast?
Daniel Rockcastle Exactly what I was thinking dude. Believe this is true until we have panels that emit negative light. But that's just being black by default, so this logic probably always holds
Hmm?that makes absolute no fucking sense like your math is right and shit but your premise is wrong in order for your statement to be correct you would have to continuously and constantly approach 0 which in my very short research of infinite contrast monitors do not truly exist
Keep up the good work you guys, i've learned a lot from these video's. I do have a couple of suggestions for other video's (mainly network related): - Full duplex vs half duplex communication - MDIX (cisco feature to determine what sort of cable is connected) - ssh vs telnet - MAC address flooding - DHCP and DHCP spoofing, DHCP snooping - NTP (network time protocol) - VLAN and the types (default, data, native, management) - VoIP - Default gateway, Broadcast, Unicast, Multicast, Loopback - Load balancing - Static routes, Dynamic routing, Floating static routes - Router-on-a-stick (mainly used in VLAN's) - ACL - NAT and PAT I know there are a couple of them that are complicated to explain easy, but I hope that i see one or two of them apear on my screen.
you need roughly a contrast of 10 000 : 1 to really reproduce what a human can see, and over 1 000 000 : 1 to encompass scenarios like being in bright sunlight and then going into a pitch black room. And contrast alone doesn't tell the whole story cause it only says how much brighter the brightest colour is in comparison to the darkest black. But you also need to know how dark the black can become. Otherwise you get a screen that in black scenes is still looking grey but can burn out your eyes with its brightness.
I like the editing in these videos, keep it up! Makes it a lot easier to explain than just having a white screen with someone talking and adds value to the video
yours ago when LED was 1st coming out, I was actually told That each company had thier own set standard for what one unit of light Would-be. so the same panel test of the exact same way at 2 different companies would come-up with 2 different Contrast ratios.
Linus, your description is incorrect. The 3000:1 or 1000:1 numbers you're quoting are called on/off or full field contrast numbers. The scene in which you discuss how the bright city lights compare to the dark background would be quantified by an ANSI contrast or intrascene contrast ratio, not on/off contrast. This is because, most of the time, you'll never actually reach the level of on/off contrast the screen is capable of when you have mixed content on screen. On/off contrast numbers are used by manufacturers because, more often than not, they're much larger than ANSI and intrascene contrast numbers. Bigger is better for marketing and is the same reason they quote screen sizes in diagonal measurements instead of width and response time in grey to grey instead of black to black. The numbers you quote in your video (3000:1 and 1000:1) are full field contrast numbers which are measured when the entire screen is at it's peak white output (white level) versus it's lowest output (black level). For dynamic contrast people should also know that in these dynamic contrast modes there is also something called dynamic gamma which occurs to compensate for brightness compression. If we simply lower the brightness of the light source the image will look dull and flat so manufacturers use some gamma adjustment to make the lighter highlights in the image brighter to compensate for the brightness loss.
When a viewer knows more about a certain topic than every other person on RUclips, and goes online to hunt these videos down and expose them. The kinda trolling I like
@ 1:40 this video is still valid. OLEDS look like the one on the left compare to LED/QLEDs that look on the right. Sure the one on the right is brighter by all means but the blooming / lack of contract kills it thus the picture on the left may be dimmer but the detail is perfect you dont lose any detail in the bright/dark areas and everything is balanced. Thus now a QLED isnt as bad as the one on the right but there is still blooming, Contrast is meh so they kinda represent each other in some type of way and with OLED having insane contrast it fits more with the picture on the left... Funny how old videos still relate as of today but the take away is i feel like contrast is what really makes the difference
Since light output is always nonnegative, there actually isn't a problem treating a ratio relative to zero light as infinite, though it still isn't particularly helpful because it's the same regardless of the maximum brightness of the OLEDs.
I get the infinite contrast ratio on the OLEDs. If they can turn the pixel off completely, any number they give for the maximum brightness will be infinitely larger than zero.
That photo comparing contrast ratios is so funny because my monitor has worse contrast ratio than either of them yet one is still darker than the other
I'm using one of the world's first ips panel - IDTech IAUX14S from 2001. it has 400:1 contrast ratio yet it still outperforms many laptop tn panels today
> Shows baby Me: hey, that's cute! Conspiracy Theorists: Linus' baby is just acting as a prop to have more people listen to his ad spots for him to receive more of that sponsor money.
the divide by 0 => undefined is because you get different results when approaching 1/0 from left and 1/0 from right. 1/(0.1) grows positively while 1/(-0.1) grows negatively => they will not move towards a single point at really small values of x => undefined. Because using smaller positive values approaches +infinite while going from left approaches -infinite. And those are two very different places. But... in this case... it would be +infinite (not -infinite, and not undefined) contrast ratio because you would only use positive numbers. Meaning that you wouldn't take into account the left hand side (the negative numbers).
no he is a prop idiot thats why he doesn't give a fuck about reverence to anything. by dropping most of his sends on his vids causing damage time to get a new front man
i'm still amazed by my square LG monitor i bought ten years ago, it's a TN panel, and still has better contrast, viewing angles, and less bleeds than my new IPS and VA monitors.
Two points: First: No two manufacturers use the same unit of measure when determining contrast ratios, therefore one brand's 3000:1 could actually be lower than another's 1000:1 Second: OLED isn't really "there" yet, and LCD contrast ratios still suck compared to my plasma display. Which, thanks to pixel shift has worked flawlessly for 5 years without any image retention. So what if I can't run at 4K, further than a foot away you would need an 80 inch panel to really tell the difference between 4k and 1080p.
I think an omega contrast ratio is more accurate, but if you want to go into accuracy we would have also noted the fact that the LED's are actually emitting light even while off meaning that contrast ratio is not infinite.
But OLED is still infinite, since the pixel goes down to completely zero black (turned off) then the difference between the black pixel and the on pixel is infinite. So what's with the 10M:1 contrast ratio? There shouldn't be a number to define it, It's ∞.
MR. AWESOME To get the ratio for a screen you divide the highest brightness with the lowest brightness. So in the case of an OLED we get the division x/0 wich is undefined, not infinity.
I always find it odd when visual examples are shown in a video like this. You need a high contrast monitor or the side-by-side examples will look exactly the same.
do a video about speakers, they are being advertised as 30.000 watts online for less than 100 bucks, but those from good brands only give up to 200 watts under 300 dollars
Technically with oleds it is an infinite contrast ratio. A fully lit pixel is infinitely brighter than a totally black one. Infinity is weird. If you think about it, even 10 is infinitely bigger than 0 when you're thinking about it in this sense as 0 cannot be multiplied to equal anything but zero until you actually add something to it. So any number greater than zero is infinitely larger when comparing it in this way.
I wish Plasmas were popular. They probably would have still been made if so. My TV has a 30,000:1 native contrast ratio and it still looks beautiful to this day even though it's been 9 years with it. No LCD/LED TV can come close. OLED looks amazing but the price not so much.
my tv is really old, and i calibrated it to make it look better. but in doing so i realised the calibration assumes a certain performance that my tv didnt have. so i made my own config where i pumped up the contrast and brought down the brightness. you lose a small ammount of detail in very dark scenes but overall it makes the tv look heaps better and ulitimately made me hold off on buying a new tv
i "liked" for the adorable baby and the awesome family man you are, linus.... i cant wait till your kids are way older and you can make videos with your kids building computers. nothing but love dude.. from Rochester NY
This matters so much monitors have custom settings for Asus monitors they use ASCR mode for example it literally will change your gaming experience and even just watching tv.
Contrast ratio should be advertised as the actual contrast the display can achieve in a single image on the screen - the ratio between the brightest highlights and darkest shadows it can show in a single frame.
Meh... I have my eyes on a 4K LED HDR Sony Bravia, LCD technology is the tried and true technology that we know well and understand every aspect of it meaning we can get the most out of it, and LCD lasts for years, I'm always very wary of newer technology especially when it doesn't really add that much, LCD is just a trusted technology that I can be sure will serve me well, also low input lag and high Hz
I haven't seen infinite contrast bring advertised before, but I have to admit that I'd be curious about what it would be like to sit 5 metres away from the surface of Rigel. I can't imagine it'd be good for my health though, or my power bill, or the grid in general.
"Closelier"
Actually, it's a word. I had to look it up to believe it.
its legit, didnt sound right until i googled it
I thought I had misheard.
i laughed so hard when i heard him say that. silly linus
i dont get it
is it me or linus' face and hands look too yellow?
ayy lmao they always have
I see it x9.
Looks like he ate a bag of cheeto's.:)
ayy lmao Thats the thermal paste, cant believe its still there.
you know the contrast ratio part makes no sense, right?
This video was really really amazing and informative, and the editing in the background for clarification was awesome, i mean all of your videos are high quality, but this one is special, good job team (y) .
"a huge grain of salt" well it won't be a grain anymore more like a block of salt
owlcity24 Deep
So clevelerlier
Just look closelier.
he meant kosher salt and not table salt.
I like the idea of a ball of salt more for some reason xD
All I care about is my k/D ratio
you some kind of furry?!
mine is 1:1000
Leo DeChant all the losers do!
k/d? pfft, its all about those assist tho
better get ready to be yiffed.
Closelyer
"If you look 'closlier' " - Linus
- Linus 2017
Jo-Bob Bubba Dude it’s an actual word, Google it
a very old one though. not used anymore. might as well start using thou(not the unit obviously) again xD.
Though it is quite weird people just decided they don't need a singular word for that anymore.
Adverb
closelier
1. (rare, literary, dated) comparative form of closely: more closely
@Jo-Bob Bubba , Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. Try the Oxford English Dictionary for example.
I'm glad that you explained Dynamic Contrast Ratio and its different forms, because I had been told in the past that these contrast ratio measurements have been just purely arbitrary from brand to brand, but this makes a ton more sense.
So... i have an old plasma screen TV. I'd assume that it has a pretty decent contrast ratio? It looks pretty good to me.
"pretty good to me" that's very relative lol. I didn't notes that I had a crappy display until I compare it side by side
@@javiercastillaOK plasmas have near oled level blacks,no led will ever get near them when it comes to contrast.
@@ntz752 but will putting another polarizer film to the screen increase a contrast ratio?
this guy looks like linus
Max Payne it is linus
palmtree486 Whoosh
No this guy's Linus's brother techquick
@@andrewschulzsd woosh
@@kdermott8748 ik its not reddit, i didnt put r/
The main reason i watch so many of yalls videos is because of 5:20. I have learned a lot because of your videos which i appreciate a lot, but also the way you are with your kids is awesome. Kepp it up LMG!
"Infinite contrast" makes sense to me. The reason why some number divided by 0 is undefined is because as you approach 0 from the left (negative) side, the limit of some number / x is negative infinity; but, as you approach 0 from the right (positive) side, it's positive infinity. Because the limits aren't equal, it's undefined. But in the world of contrast ratios, aren't you really only approaching 0 from the positive side? You can't really have a negative brightness anyway. Hence, infinite contrast?
Daniel Rockcastle Exactly what I was thinking dude. Believe this is true until we have panels that emit negative light. But that's just being black by default, so this logic probably always holds
Hmm?that makes absolute no fucking sense like your math is right and shit but your premise is wrong in order for your statement to be correct you would have to continuously and constantly approach 0 which in my very short research of infinite contrast monitors do not truly exist
5:22 that baby is like "what did i just get myself into?"
Keep up the good work you guys, i've learned a lot from these video's.
I do have a couple of suggestions for other video's (mainly network related):
- Full duplex vs half duplex communication
- MDIX (cisco feature to determine what sort of cable is connected)
- ssh vs telnet
- MAC address flooding
- DHCP and DHCP spoofing, DHCP snooping
- NTP (network time protocol)
- VLAN and the types (default, data, native, management)
- VoIP
- Default gateway, Broadcast, Unicast, Multicast, Loopback
- Load balancing
- Static routes, Dynamic routing, Floating static routes
- Router-on-a-stick (mainly used in VLAN's)
- ACL
- NAT and PAT
I know there are a couple of them that are complicated to explain easy, but I hope that i see one or two of them apear on my screen.
Linus should be a WWE presenter
you need roughly a contrast of 10 000 : 1 to really reproduce what a human can see, and over 1 000 000 : 1 to encompass scenarios like being in bright sunlight and then going into a pitch black room.
And contrast alone doesn't tell the whole story cause it only says how much brighter the brightest colour is in comparison to the darkest black. But you also need to know how dark the black can become.
Otherwise you get a screen that in black scenes is still looking grey but can burn out your eyes with its brightness.
I like the editing in these videos, keep it up! Makes it a lot easier to explain than just having a white screen with someone talking and adds value to the video
Thanks for explaining dynamic contrast (and the huge ratios advertised with it).
yours ago when LED was 1st coming out, I was actually told That each company had thier own set standard for what one unit of light Would-be. so the same panel test of the exact same way at 2 different companies would come-up with 2 different Contrast ratios.
Linus, your description is incorrect. The 3000:1 or 1000:1 numbers you're quoting are called on/off or full field contrast numbers. The scene in which you discuss how the bright city lights compare to the dark background would be quantified by an ANSI contrast or intrascene contrast ratio, not on/off contrast. This is because, most of the time, you'll never actually reach the level of on/off contrast the screen is capable of when you have mixed content on screen. On/off contrast numbers are used by manufacturers because, more often than not, they're much larger than ANSI and intrascene contrast numbers. Bigger is better for marketing and is the same reason they quote screen sizes in diagonal measurements instead of width and response time in grey to grey instead of black to black. The numbers you quote in your video (3000:1 and 1000:1) are full field contrast numbers which are measured when the entire screen is at it's peak white output (white level) versus it's lowest output (black level). For dynamic contrast people should also know that in these dynamic contrast modes there is also something called dynamic gamma which occurs to compensate for brightness compression. If we simply lower the brightness of the light source the image will look dull and flat so manufacturers use some gamma adjustment to make the lighter highlights in the image brighter to compensate for the brightness loss.
great info!
When a viewer knows more about a certain topic than every other person on RUclips, and goes online to hunt these videos down and expose them. The kinda trolling I like
This video helped me a lot! Thanks for making it to help inform the buyers
I was expecting a "Over 9000" joke
This video was WAY better than I expected.
"closelier"
-Linus (2017)
this vid was actually super helpful though. bravo.
"Closely-er"
- Linus Sebastian June 13, 2017
He said closlier in another video.
@ 1:40 this video is still valid. OLEDS look like the one on the left compare to LED/QLEDs that look on the right. Sure the one on the right is brighter by all means but the blooming / lack of contract kills it thus the picture on the left may be dimmer but the detail is perfect you dont lose any detail in the bright/dark areas and everything is balanced.
Thus now a QLED isnt as bad as the one on the right but there is still blooming, Contrast is meh so they kinda represent each other in some type of way and with OLED having insane contrast it fits more with the picture on the left...
Funny how old videos still relate as of today but the take away is i feel like contrast is what really makes the difference
Since light output is always nonnegative, there actually isn't a problem treating a ratio relative to zero light as infinite, though it still isn't particularly helpful because it's the same regardless of the maximum brightness of the OLEDs.
I get the infinite contrast ratio on the OLEDs. If they can turn the pixel off completely, any number they give for the maximum brightness will be infinitely larger than zero.
Wow, my TV had a label "100,000:1" contrast and I was wondering, huh? But when you told me to look closlier, I saw "dynamic contrast" I'm mindblown
"one billion to one" *1,000,000 to 1 pops up behind him*
They never fail to make me laugh
That photo comparing contrast ratios is so funny because my monitor has worse contrast ratio than either of them yet one is still darker than the other
Very detailed explanation. Thanks 😊
Waiting for microLED displays. QLED displays offer great contrast and visual quality at lower cost
I'm using one of the world's first ips panel - IDTech IAUX14S from 2001. it has 400:1 contrast ratio yet it still outperforms many laptop tn panels today
Thanks for this, was actually curious about this recently.
"Dull Stars on a Charcoal background" perfectly describes an actual night in Baltimore, Md, And New York City, and Chicago IL.
> Shows baby
Me: hey, that's cute!
Conspiracy Theorists: Linus' baby is just acting as a prop to have more people listen to his ad spots for him to receive more of that sponsor money.
Exactly!
Loving these FAP (Fast As Possible) series!
2:35 "closelier" 😂
Still can't believe Linus's hands ARE STILL STAINED from the thermal compound video
Well explained, clarity at last, oh and cool wrap up..
i was just watching linus's HDR video and now i'm here because i found a DCR setting on my monitor
the divide by 0 => undefined is because you get different results when approaching 1/0 from left and 1/0 from right.
1/(0.1) grows positively while 1/(-0.1) grows negatively => they will not move towards a single point at really small values of x => undefined. Because using smaller positive values approaches +infinite while going from left approaches -infinite. And those are two very different places.
But... in this case... it would be +infinite (not -infinite, and not undefined) contrast ratio because you would only use positive numbers. Meaning that you wouldn't take into account the left hand side (the negative numbers).
We all know the most important is that hips to waist ratio
Can you make a video comparing ips, va, tn, etc. panels. Your last video is 4 years old.
And now your comment is 3 years old. Yet nothing new, no video on that. Sedlyf
i thought he was talking to Dennis there at the end XD
I just realized that even though linus channel is about high-end electronics, they still upload videos in 30fps
The picture on the TV was Samuel Beckett Bridge in Dublin
I liked just for the baby
Pervert.
Actually, Linus is an adult, just very short.
no he is a prop idiot thats why he doesn't give a fuck about reverence to anything. by dropping most of his sends on his vids causing damage
time to get a new front man
i'm glad he didn't drop the baby like usual
so what monitor do you recommend depending on the contrast ratio?
I like how much Linus in slowmotion sounds like Luke.
I wish Linus would also talk about internet connection bufferbloat vs speed.
Aw... Look at the cute little baby! Congrats on a wonderful child!
i'm still amazed by my square LG monitor i bought ten years ago, it's a TN panel, and still has better contrast, viewing angles, and less bleeds than my new IPS and VA monitors.
I actually needed this! Thanks!
my TV just went nuts so I'm looking for a new one... this can't be a coincidence
Two points:
First: No two manufacturers use the same unit of measure when determining contrast ratios, therefore one brand's 3000:1 could actually be lower than another's 1000:1
Second: OLED isn't really "there" yet, and LCD contrast ratios still suck compared to my plasma display. Which, thanks to pixel shift has worked flawlessly for 5 years without any image retention.
So what if I can't run at 4K, further than a foot away you would need an 80 inch panel to really tell the difference between 4k and 1080p.
I don't know if they still do, but I remember how Samsung would often list "infinite" as their contrast ratio for their monitors.
I wish I had 1:1 contrast ratio
IT'S A JOKE!
GBCAwesome hue
GBC you would be bliiiind man
your the best bro big fan helped me to build my tech life and everything
please always update on computer tech like you always do because you really help
i needed a video like this Linus. thanks
I dropped a like simply because he's so frikin enthusiastic!!
I think an omega contrast ratio is more accurate, but if you want to go into accuracy we would have also noted the fact that the LED's are actually emitting light even while off meaning that contrast ratio is not infinite.
Heck yeah! More of the adorable kids!
LOOK AT LINUS AT THE END MY PURE CINNAMON ROLL
Ooooo, watching this video on infinite contrast ratio (amoled) is insane!
But OLED is still infinite, since the pixel goes down to completely zero black (turned off) then the difference between the black pixel and the on pixel is infinite. So what's with the 10M:1 contrast ratio? There shouldn't be a number to define it, It's ∞.
MR. AWESOME To get the ratio for a screen you divide the highest brightness with the lowest brightness. So in the case of an OLED we get the division x/0 wich is undefined, not infinity.
what is the contrast ratio TBD, I found this in aqua tv specification?
I always find it odd when visual examples are shown in a video like this. You need a high contrast monitor or the side-by-side examples will look exactly the same.
This episode of Techquickie brought to you by Closelier™
Damn, nice editing!
I dropped my hot pocket when the GW2760HS came up... That's my monitor. I got it for $100!
do a video about speakers, they are being advertised as 30.000 watts online for less than 100 bucks, but those from good brands only give up to 200 watts under 300 dollars
"If you look *closelyer*"
Oh Linus😂
Technically with oleds it is an infinite contrast ratio. A fully lit pixel is infinitely brighter than a totally black one. Infinity is weird. If you think about it, even 10 is infinitely bigger than 0 when you're thinking about it in this sense as 0 cannot be multiplied to equal anything but zero until you actually add something to it. So any number greater than zero is infinitely larger when comparing it in this way.
Robotic Nerd But to get a ratio you divide the highest brightnes with the lowest. That gives you x/0 wich is undefined.
A Freaking Sandwich But if you use limits, it approaches infinity, which works well enough.
True
4:00 - "I told you not to divide by zero!!!"
-Taran
OMG!!! 0.5 IS the proper speed to listen to Linus! XD
"Closelyer", that's a new one.
"well if you look closelier" - Linus 2017
Hi
I wish Plasmas were popular. They probably would have still been made if so. My TV has a 30,000:1 native contrast ratio and it still looks beautiful to this day even though it's been 9 years with it. No LCD/LED TV can come close. OLED looks amazing but the price not so much.
.75 speed is perfect for Linus, but he either seems to be thinking about his words to carefully or just being plain sarcastic.
Goddammit "Closlier" returns
what about
Brightness
250 cd/m²
???????
Candles per square meter.
my tv is really old, and i calibrated it to make it look better. but in doing so i realised the calibration assumes a certain performance that my tv didnt have. so i made my own config where i pumped up the contrast and brought down the brightness. you lose a small ammount of detail in very dark scenes but overall it makes the tv look heaps better and ulitimately made me hold off on buying a new tv
i "liked" for the adorable baby and the awesome family man you are, linus.... i cant wait till your kids are way older and you can make videos with your kids building computers. nothing but love dude.. from Rochester NY
Technically even an OLED panel doesn't have infinite contrast ratio, since there is no material in this world that is perfectly black.
Great video Mr Tips
This matters so much monitors have custom settings for Asus monitors they use ASCR mode for example it literally will change your gaming experience and even just watching tv.
I knew most of this because my new phone hasca very good display, while my 7 years old TV has not
Contrast ratio should be advertised as the actual contrast the display can achieve in a single image on the screen - the ratio between the brightest highlights and darkest shadows it can show in a single frame.
Contrast Ratio >>>>> Resolution
Linus gonna drop his baby like he drops everything ...
4:18 "FreshBookS haS you covered."
The baby was like "who the hell r u talking to bro"
What I hate the most is that a 40 inch tv has a "4K" sticker on front but has the actual resolution of 720p. I was soooo shocked that I froze.
Great video. Well explained !
Closlyer? @ 2:34.. really Linus....not Closer....but Close - ly - er...much love
Meh... I have my eyes on a 4K LED HDR Sony Bravia, LCD technology is the tried and true technology that we know well and understand every aspect of it meaning we can get the most out of it, and LCD lasts for years, I'm always very wary of newer technology especially when it doesn't really add that much, LCD is just a trusted technology that I can be sure will serve me well, also low input lag and high Hz
I haven't seen infinite contrast bring advertised before, but I have to admit that I'd be curious about what it would be like to sit 5 metres away from the surface of Rigel. I can't imagine it'd be good for my health though, or my power bill, or the grid in general.
When you want to watch Freshbooks ads and you get a big surprise.