OMG, what a beautiful accent. Impressive fluency, she speaks English very well, as if it was her native language. The best teacher on RUclips I've ever seen...
faliq khudadost ... This teacher has no clue about the correct pronunciation of English phonemes or word stress or sentence stress and these are the things that make English sound like English...
Rachna, You're beautiful! Your bold simplicity is elegant! Your knowledge is honorable! Your pedagogical style is compassionate and appreciable! Smiles, gratitude and blessings to the woman of substance, Ms. Rachna.
I like the way you teach. You did really explain things that most people gets confused about. I honestly get confused about verb tenses and I've been searching a lot of explanation here in youtube so, luckily I stumbled here. Many thanks for sharing your knowledge. I'll keep on learning these lessons with you.
Superb explanation. You are the best teacher in let's talk. I have never seen the teacher like you in online platform. I don't have words to praise you. Excellent... Excellent.... Excellent
I have to say that I really like your work and it has helped me a great deal. Just a small point though; is it not better to say "My uncle has BEEN to NY five times", meaning that he went to NY and has come back 5 times. "My uncle has GONE to NY five times" suggest that he somehow went to NY five times without coming back.
1. You lived there once, you no more live there , probably you are living somewhere else now. 2. Have been: represents you are still doing that, like you have been living for the past 7 yrs and you are STILL living in the same place.
You're a very good teacher, I actually use your videos to prepare some classes, thank you. But your accent is weird, not bad, just different.. What is it? Indian blended with British?? Regards!
Indians are actually taught British English in India, only if they come to America they have a hard time bcuz British English and American English is different
I wouldn't say that 'someone has gone to a country 5 times', because that implies that the person has gone there and didn't come back. I'd say 'he has been to NY for 5 times.
She provides two examples. The one you mention, and shortly after the one I mention. The example of the dead uncle was only given to show past tense, not so for the present perfect example.
Edith Lopez Well, my comment was based on the example that I read in the descriptions. Anyway, I'll listen to it later and give you my thoughts. Thanks!
_That's a really interesting observation there and I totally agree with you, For example if you're having a conversation with an American i'm certain that there would most likely choose to say I've been to New York five times rather than saying i've gone to new york 5 times... exept that you added FOR in your correction which is incorrect by the way ... There is also another mistake that I was able to spot on the same example, She said My uncle went to New York 5 times which would be only applied for someone who has already passed away (Died) and that isn't true at all cause you can still talk about the past whether you're dead or alive because we are just talking about something from the past_
Hi Rachana If u still live in London u should say "I have been living in London for 7 years" But Is it correct to use, (present perfect) ? "I've lived in London for 7 years"
Both are correct, Varun - “I have lived in London for 7 years” focusses on the result (7 years); “I have been living in London for 7 years” focusses on the activity of “living”. With this verb (live) there is very little difference. However, with other verbs you need to remember to use the Simple for results, and the Continuous for activity 😊
I have lived in London for 7 years. (I am still living in London) I have been living in London for 7 years.(I am still living in London) present perfect focuses on completion while present perfect continuous focuses on continuous activity. But here they have the same meaning because of the verb 'live'
+Learn English with Let's Talk - Free English Lessons pleas my teacher :what is the right way ? past simple?or simple past ?thank you so much for your teaching.
past perfect -- The patient had died, The doctor had died etc. past indefinite -- The patient died, The doctor died etc. 1)The patient died. Then the doctor died. The patient had died before the doctor died. The doctor died after the patient had died. 2) The doctor died. Then the patient died. The doctor had died before the patient died. The patient died after the doctor had died. 3) The train left. Then we reached the station. We reached the station after the train had left. The train had left before we reached the station. 4) We reached the station. Then the train left. We had reached the station before the train left. The train left after we had reached the station.
what's the difference between: 1) I have been working at ABC for 5 years (present perfect continuous) 2) I have worked at ABC for 5 years ( present perfect) I suppose both tell us that worked for them 5 years before and I still work for them today. my question is what is the the most correct?
+Ana Patrícia Barbosa hi Ana. 1) present perfect continuous =you are working so for not quit. 2)present perfect=you worked for them until now, but you may have a second thought , you are gonna quit the job. quite a few reason between (present perfect continuous=activity is ongoing) ( present perfect=effect and the state is not existing)
+معا لنحقق اهدافنا hi معا لنحقق اهدافنا, The both sentence are correct. let me tell you the distinction between present perfect and present perfect continuous. present perfect: you are doing a work that work is finished just now or a few hours, so you want to say that, your work is completed with duration of time, e.g " I have completed the task for 2years (you emphasize the duration ,how long you took) present perfect continuous: your work is not completed up to date, so your work progress is unfinished action, e.g " I have been doing this task for 2years".
I Hv lived means a permanent situation . You are going to live there for many more years. But I Hv been living means a temporary situation . You think u will not live there for long in future.
thank you so much my great teacher. really you're good in English grammar. I have understood between present perfect and simple past to day. you're example like this day this week this month/year let me to understand this different. Thank so much
Hi thank you for uploading this video, it is truly beneficial. However, I got a little confused with the two examples; the one with the Uncle and London. Like what you mentioned, "My uncle has gone to NY 5 times" means that he is still alive right? So if I talk about my own life and say I lived in London for 7 years, does it mean Im dead? Im sorry but can you explain how to i judge which is correct when encountering anomalies such as this? It would be a great help to me, thanks!!
Haha, it doesnt mean you're dead, it just means you no longer are living in London.. "I lived in London for 7 years" means you used to live in London but have moved since then.
1)My uncle has gone to NY 5 times. It means he has not returned from NY. But 5 times, so his four departed souls have gone to NY four times. 2) I lived in London for 7 years.You are dead. A dead person says 'I lived in London for 7 years.' So you are a ghost. So your uncle is walking dead and you are talking dead. CORRECTION : My uncle has been to NY 5 times. (He is alive.) CORRECTION : I lived in London 7 years.(I am alive and I am not living in London). I live in Manchester,Toronto, etc.
Had means that something which has started in the past and ended in the past if i use "i had lived" it means that i was living at that time but now iam either dead or something else happened.
@@TrikamRajpurohit yeah it do but here she is talking about perfect continuous difference or as i remember so.therefore, she will try to give examples in accordance with that tense too.so yeah you could improvise some sentences which means the same
I think that in the last example, both of the versions are incorrect. The best ones would be (at least from grammar's perspective) - I have been living in London for 7 years / I had been living in London for 7 years. The first one is still ongoing, while the second one took place in the past and has finished.
I think: I had been living .... is suitable when you are talking about a specific time in the past during your stay in London. When you are out of London and talking about the past then: I lived ... is correct.. So both the video and your sentence are correct but different from each other.
Let me make it clear - Good question.... 'I have lived in London for seven years' implies that I stayed in London for 7 years but don't live now; however still connected to the place. I've been living in London for 7 years - this sentence implies that I started living in London 7 yrs back and still living at the same place. One thing more - - Had the sentence been in simple past, its meaning would have been different. He lived in London for 7 years- this sentence implies that the action completed in the past at a definite point of time. (now he has no connection with London / Dead by now)
Yes, it is correct. I have lived in London for 7 years. (I am still living in London) I have been living in London for 7 years.(I am still living in London) present perfect focuses on completion while present perfect continuous focuses on continuous activity. But here they have the same meaning because of the verb 'live'
I've been living in London since 7 years.As the time frame is still in process. That means u have specific last 7 years of living there n still u r there.
"i have lived in London for 7 years" here it's not clear whether I still live in London or not. But if I say " I have been living in London for 7 years" here it is confirmed that I still live in London.
I have been living in London for 7 years. - If you are still living there. I have lived in London for 7 years. - To mean at the moment you have completed 7 years of living there. I had lived in London for 7 years. - You had completed 7 years of living there in the past but stating it at present. I lived in London. - For single past event where time frame or another action is not mentioned. I lived in London in 2015. - As point in time (2015) is mentioned. I had lived in London when Ram went there. - Your living had been completed before Ram went there. I had lived in London during lockdown. - Time frame mentioned.
Good question.... 'I have lived in London for seven years' implies that I stayed in London for 7 years but don't live now; however still connected to the place. I've been living in London for 7 years - this sentence implies that I started living in London 7 yrs back and still living at the same place. One thing more - - Had the sentence been in simple past, its meaning would have been different. He lived in London for 7 years- this sentence implies that the action completed in the past at a definite point of time. (now he has no connection with London / Dead by now) ruclips.net/video/KuT2rygfDNk/видео.html
Anybody, help!!! me please because my brain is completely melted!!! If I say that I went to the school when I was a kid, does it mean I do not exist? How can I say this phrase and be still alive? Please!!!
+Ranessa Nainggolan when you use present perfect "have been" it means that you still live in London. and when you use simple past "lived" it means you no longer live in London.
Hello! they are both correct because of the use of "I've". Since "I've" is a contraction of "I have", it's stated that you have been and still are living in London. However, if you want to say you used to live in london, you would just say "I lived in...". See the difference? So, "I'VE lived" = have been and still are living "I lived" = used to be living
I have lived in London for 7 years. (I am still living in London) I have been living in London for 7 years.(I am still living in London) present perfect focuses on completion while present perfect continuous focuses on continuous activity. But here they have the same meaning because of the verb 'live'
@@gyansagar139 i have lived means you no more lives there, you are talking about your experience living there but i have been living means you are still living there.. Okk i hope you have understand.now..
Rachnaji Really i m very impressed after watching this video , very very easy to understand because u explained both the example together present perfect and past simple ,,,, Thanks a lot make us understand 👍👍👍👍
I usually prefer to see English lessons with native speakers. But I have to admit that this is the best video about differences between PPS and PS. Thank you very much!
You have clarified my doubts now by this video which were always striving me as between have/has and past tense uses. Moreover I have grasped from this video that is never/ever/hardly followed by the present perfect tense in the question. Your explain along with examples are incredible to an opsi. Thanks🙏 Please make video for " Have been/has been ".
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
She is one of the best teachers on RUclips. Always so clear and never doing self-help stuff.
Me too.
Even I think the same.
It's always. Not alwais .
Yaa... Best teacher
Yeah but I don't understand anything i don't know whyyyyy
@@itzalishba9347 yes bro... Boring
@@pramodKumar-qg9wf watch Learn English Lab channel you may like his way of teaching.
I've never seen such a great teacher in my life....
OMG, what a beautiful accent. Impressive fluency, she speaks English very well, as if it was her native language. The best teacher on RUclips I've ever seen...
+Ivan Dsm she is amazing at grammar ............. but far away speaking like American or British ............. she speaks like Indian
Yeah right, I agree
Are you serious !!!
what do mean brother
faliq khudadost ... This teacher has no clue about the correct pronunciation of English phonemes or word stress or sentence stress and these are the things that make English sound like English...
Her explanation is very clear, I can understand it easily.
Are you a blink?
Kulwinder Kaur I am a blink 🌚🌚
But its all wrong
*Studies in school for a whole day : Understands barely anything
*Studies from youtube : Understands immediately
It goes for everything
Rachna,
You're beautiful!
Your bold simplicity is elegant!
Your knowledge is honorable!
Your pedagogical style is compassionate and appreciable!
Smiles, gratitude and blessings to the woman of substance, Ms. Rachna.
Seems funny but true
I have studied woderful subject today😍
Reality is here every one wants to learn willingly and the school was just a responsibility 😜
I am very proud of this clever teacher, she is amazing.
You helped me clear the last bits of confusion I had, when trying to use these tenses, thank you very much.
Spectacular method. .I really like this class,because I was completely confused about these tenses 👍💞💗
Hooo in 2019 I have been looking for a good teacher and let me tell you that your are a great teacher...
Explained well
Thank you so much, This is what I was looking for.
So true
I like the way you teach. You did really explain things that most people gets confused about. I honestly get confused about verb tenses and I've been searching a lot of explanation here in youtube so, luckily I stumbled here. Many thanks for sharing your knowledge. I'll keep on learning these lessons with you.
Amazing..this is first time I have seen such a class , outstanding..
You're brilliant madam, such a lucid explanation to explain the subtle difference between perfect and past tenses is simply fantastic. Thank you.
Thnx for letting me know more about these two, u really concentrate on teaching instead of giving unwanted expressions, thnx again for being there
you are one of the best teacher I have listened today. God bless you with the gift of teaching.
It's simple, straightforward and with realistic examples.
I loved it!!! you're an excellent teacher!! it was a lot easier for me to understand it!!
It was really helpful and explained in a good way, really appreciated the way she teach.
You are born to be a teacher
Your example and explanation
Infuse in my mind
Thanks. All the videos which containt about the grammar lesson, your video is exellent.
Thank you Ma'am to remove our confusion in this lesson
thank you very very much for ur explaining .. it was very good and u r right it is not hard as ithought about ♡♡
thank u so much again ♡♡♡
Your explanation is amazing thank you so much
Mam you are great teacher you teach like saraswati once bless you than foolish man also speak fluently god bless you thank you
Superb explanation. You are the best teacher in let's talk. I have never seen the teacher like you in online platform. I don't have words to praise you.
Excellent... Excellent.... Excellent
Amazing....Great explanations...Thank you so much...Respect
I'm preparing for ssc, and believe me, I've gotten completely the concept of time and tense here. Thank you Ma'am
Stunning 👌Explanation.
Can You Please Make A Video On "Difference Between Past Indefinite And Past Perfect."
Your method of teaching seems to be genuine and therefore it needs to be appreciated and commended. I really recommend others to watch your videos...
Very nice lesson for me. your teaching style and talking manner is so good.
I have to say that I really like your work and it has helped me a great deal. Just a small point though; is it not better to say "My uncle has BEEN to NY five times", meaning that he went to NY and has come back 5 times. "My uncle has GONE to NY five times" suggest that he somehow went to NY five times without coming back.
+meerkatinfrance I agree with you. It's better to say He has been to NY five times etc.
Why is it better? They mean to same thing.
Yes, you are right - it is better to say he has been to NY 5 times 😄. Exactly as you say, Gone is used to mean that someone is not here now.
Mark Rios 'has gone' means her uncle is still there. 'Has been' means he went there before, but he is not there now.
You went to NY 5 times, so that mean you passed away?
Let me know difference of below two sentenses.
1) I have lived in Vadodara for 7 years.
2) I have been living in Vadodara for 7 years.
1. You lived there once, you no more live there , probably you are living somewhere else now.
2. Have been: represents you are still doing that, like you have been living for the past 7 yrs and you are STILL living in the same place.
Meaning of both sentences are same. There are some exceptions in funny launguage & i.e. work, live etc. Those words can be used in both tenses.
Ur first sentence is of present perfect...& ur second sentence is of present perfect continuous...
Great question
You're a very good teacher, I actually use your videos to prepare some classes, thank you. But your accent is weird, not bad, just different.. What is it? Indian blended with British??
Regards!
Kaleu Cadl I use her videos for the same reason! hahah they help me prepare some lessons! haha Hii!!
Kaleu Cadl She is probably a indian woman that's why her accent is a little weird.
Kaleu Cadl Ya shez an Indian, and here we call it different instead of weird. Weird is sooo weird to be used here ;)
+Kaleu Cadl
First learn where to use word weird
Indians are actually taught British English in India, only if they come to America they have a hard time bcuz British English and American English is different
You a wonderful teacher and your way of teaching and example s are understanding clearly.
U r such a good teacher. The way u explained is so easy to understand. Awesome 👏
I wouldn't say that 'someone has gone to a country 5 times', because that implies that the person has gone there and didn't come back. I'd say 'he has been to NY for 5 times.
I believe the example was "My uncle went to NY 5 times" which she pointed out as an example of a person who has already passed away.
Edith Lopez She says the person has gone to NY. She used present perfect tense. We don't use the present perfect tense with people who passed away.
She provides two examples. The one you mention, and shortly after the one I mention. The example of the dead uncle was only given to show past tense, not so for the present perfect example.
Edith Lopez Well, my comment was based on the example that I read in the descriptions. Anyway, I'll listen to it later and give you my thoughts.
Thanks!
_That's a really interesting observation there and I totally agree with you, For example if you're having a conversation with an American i'm certain that there would most likely choose to say I've been to New York five times rather than saying i've gone to new york 5 times... exept that you added FOR in your correction which is incorrect by the way ... There is also another mistake that I was able to spot on the same example, She said My uncle went to New York 5 times which would be only applied for someone who has already passed away (Died) and that isn't true at all cause you can still talk about the past whether you're dead or alive because we are just talking about something from the past_
Hi Rachana
If u still live in London u should say
"I have been living in London for 7 years"
But Is it correct to use, (present perfect) ?
"I've lived in London for 7 years"
You're right
You are right
Is the first example a present perfect continuous? And the second one is present perfect?
Both are correct, Varun - “I have lived in London for 7 years” focusses on the result (7 years); “I have been living in London for 7 years” focusses on the activity of “living”. With this verb (live) there is very little difference. However, with other verbs you need to remember to use the Simple for results, and the Continuous for activity 😊
I have lived in London for 7 years. (I am still living in London)
I have been living in London for 7 years.(I am still living in London)
present perfect focuses on completion while present perfect continuous focuses on continuous activity.
But here they have the same meaning because of the verb 'live'
Madam, We the whole family eager to learn english step by step by your videos. Let me know what to do
vedamurthy MURTHY You can join our online training program - Kindly email your requirement at support@letstalkpodcast.com
+Learn English with Let's Talk - Free English Lessons pleas my teacher :what is the right way ? past simple?or simple past ?thank you so much for your teaching.
This is a great question. Are you learning American English? If so, use the Simple Past Tense.
vedamurthy MURTHY
vedamurthy MURTHY
It was a headache for me for long time. But now it's clear what to use when to use. Thanks a lot.
I haven't come across such a clear explanation yet. You are a brilliant teacher. Keep up with a good work. Stay mellow.
Ma'am Could you please make the lession on difference between past indefinite and past perfect tense
past perfect -- The patient had died, The doctor had died etc.
past indefinite -- The patient died, The doctor died etc.
1)The patient died. Then the doctor died. The patient had died before the doctor died. The doctor died after the patient had died. 2) The doctor died. Then the patient died. The doctor had died before the patient died. The patient died after the doctor had died. 3) The train left. Then we reached the station. We reached the station after the train had left. The train had left before we reached the station. 4) We reached the station. Then the train left. We had reached the station before the train left. The train left after we had reached the station.
can i say at the third example: i have been living in London for 7 years (using Present Perfect continuous)?
Osama sarhan yes
Yes of course
@@fauziamazhar3838 me too
Mam, I have scored 90 out of 100
'This morning' was little bit confusing
U are one of the best teacher in this channel , I admire the way u teach.plz continue ure great work
Excellent first video who explained it clearly through deep roots
7:20 🤣 you nearly trapped yourself. Thanks so much for this course, this makes things infinitely clearer! 😇👏
Yes
If u r still living in London you should say that I have been living in London for 7years
wow! u cleared my doubts
Thank you
I found the perfect "TEACHER".
Thank you! The demonstration is really clear and easy to follow , it's so good.
Absolutely Great Dear Ma'am. Your lecture has cleared my all doubts regarding these two.
I have enjoyed the lesson today? ?? is it right
Yes it is
what's the difference between:
1) I have been working at ABC for 5 years (present perfect continuous)
2) I have worked at ABC for 5 years ( present perfect)
I suppose both tell us that worked for them 5 years before and I still work for them today.
my question is what is the the most correct?
they are both completely and equally correct! :)
Present perfect continuous - you are still working and in present perfect you have leave your leave your work or job recently
+Ana Patrícia Barbosa hi Ana.
1) present perfect continuous =you are working so for not quit.
2)present perfect=you worked for them until now, but you may have a second thought , you are gonna quit the job.
quite a few reason between (present perfect continuous=activity is ongoing) ( present perfect=effect and the state is not existing)
thanks
+معا لنحقق اهدافنا hi معا لنحقق اهدافنا,
The both sentence are correct.
let me tell you the distinction between present perfect and present perfect continuous.
present perfect: you are doing a work that work is finished just now or a few hours, so you want to say that, your work is completed with duration of time, e.g " I have completed the task for 2years (you emphasize the duration ,how long you took)
present perfect continuous: your work is not completed up to date, so your work progress is unfinished action, e.g " I have been doing this task for 2years".
i've been living in london for 7 years.
i've lived in london for 7 yrs.
ma'am can u tell me the diffrnc btw both sentcs..
The first means you still living in london at the moment .. the second means you are no longer living there
@@rllrll9512 no, it's the same meaning
I Hv lived means a permanent situation . You are going to live there for many more years.
But I Hv been living means a temporary situation . You think u will not live there for long in future.
Both sentences are correct. Live & work can be used in both tenses ( present perfect & present perfect continuous).
Yes sometimes we can use P.P. C AS P.P EX WE HAVE KNOWN EACH FOR TEN YEARS BUT I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHY LIVE IS USED HERE
thank you so much my great teacher. really you're good in English grammar. I have understood between present perfect and simple past to day. you're example like this day this week this month/year let me to understand this different. Thank so much
It has been a clear explanation where you can understand the lesson easily ...Thank you
Hi thank you for uploading this video, it is truly beneficial. However, I got a little confused with the two examples; the one with the Uncle and London. Like what you mentioned, "My uncle has gone to NY 5 times" means that he is still alive right? So if I talk about my own life and say I lived in London for 7 years, does it mean Im dead? Im sorry but can you explain how to i judge which is correct when encountering anomalies such as this? It would be a great help to me, thanks!!
Haha, it doesnt mean you're dead, it just means you no longer are living in London.. "I lived in London for 7 years" means you used to live in London but have moved since then.
+ella del rey excuse me, but he is actually dead. rip.
i lived in london 7 year. simple past,do not use for
1)My uncle has gone to NY 5 times. It means he has not returned from NY. But 5 times, so his four departed souls have gone to NY four times.
2) I lived in London for 7 years.You are dead. A dead person says 'I lived in London for 7 years.' So you are a ghost.
So your uncle is walking dead and you are talking dead.
CORRECTION : My uncle has been to NY 5 times. (He is alive.)
CORRECTION : I lived in London 7 years.(I am alive and I am not living in London). I live in Manchester,Toronto, etc.
7:58
Why not I've been living for 7 years?
8:48
How would it be different if I say 'I had lived'?
Had means that something which has started in the past and ended in the past if i use "i had lived" it means that i was living at that time but now iam either dead or something else happened.
@@harshdeepsingh185 past perfect also reflects the same meaning.
Doesn't it?
@@TrikamRajpurohit yeah it do but here she is talking about perfect continuous difference or as i remember so.therefore, she will try to give examples in accordance with that tense too.so yeah you could improvise some sentences which means the same
I think that in the last example, both of the versions are incorrect.
The best ones would be (at least from grammar's perspective) - I have been living in London for 7 years / I had been living in London for 7 years. The first one is still ongoing, while the second one took place in the past and has finished.
I think: I had been living .... is suitable when you are talking about a specific time in the past during your stay in London. When you are out of London and talking about the past then: I lived ... is correct.. So both the video and your sentence are correct but different from each other.
I lived in London for 7 years is perfectly correct from a grammar standpoint.
your teaching methodology is superior and helpful thanks
I just watch your channel to brush up my rusty english and it's really helpful. Thank you so much! :)
I have been living in London for 7 years. Is it still correct?
That's the thing.
As per ma'am, I've lived in London for 7 years interprets that I'm still living in London and that's somehow unacceptable.
Your sentence is the best one, it is Present Perfect Continuous Tense.
Let me make it clear -
Good question....
'I have lived in London for seven years' implies that I stayed in London for 7 years but don't live now; however still connected to the place.
I've been living in London for 7 years - this sentence implies that I started living in London 7 yrs back and still living at the same place. One thing more - -
Had the sentence been in simple past, its meaning would have been different.
He lived in London for 7 years- this sentence implies that the action completed in the past at a definite point of time. (now he has no connection with London / Dead by now)
Yes, it is correct.
I have lived in London for 7 years. (I am still living in London)
I have been living in London for 7 years.(I am still living in London)
present perfect focuses on completion while present perfect continuous focuses on continuous activity.
But here they have the same meaning because of the verb 'live'
Which one is correct , "I've been living in London for 7 years" or " I've lived in London for 7 years". Why ?
i have been.
I've been living in London since 7 years.As the time frame is still in process. That means u have specific last 7 years of living there n still u r there.
I've been living shows the continuity of the action
Both are corrects.
Her examples are wrong and she herself is confused about grammar.
I HV been living in London for 7 years.that would be perfect sentence.
"i have lived in London for 7 years" here it's not clear whether I still live in London or not. But if I say " I have been living in London for 7 years" here it is confirmed that I still live in London.
Present perfect continuous mean : work started in the past but it is going on still now .
@@lovelyindia21 correct
I have been living in London for 7 years. - If you are still living there.
I have lived in London for 7 years. - To mean at the moment you have completed 7 years of living there.
I had lived in London for 7 years. - You had completed 7 years of living there in the past but stating it at present.
I lived in London. - For single past event where time frame or another action is not mentioned.
I lived in London in 2015. - As point in time (2015) is mentioned.
I had lived in London when Ram went there. - Your living had been completed before Ram went there.
I had lived in London during lockdown. - Time frame mentioned.
Good question....
'I have lived in London for seven years' implies that I stayed in London for 7 years but don't live now; however still connected to the place.
I've been living in London for 7 years - this sentence implies that I started living in London 7 yrs back and still living at the same place. One thing more - -
Had the sentence been in simple past, its meaning would have been different.
He lived in London for 7 years- this sentence implies that the action completed in the past at a definite point of time. (now he has no connection with London / Dead by now)
ruclips.net/video/KuT2rygfDNk/видео.html
I like the way your teaching to us.
this is very easy to understand everyone who wants to learn English.
Her explanation is very clear, I can understand it easily!!!!!
Anybody, help!!! me please because my brain is completely melted!!! If I say that I went to the school when I was a kid, does it mean I do not exist? How can I say this phrase and be still alive? Please!!!
Leo Alex well i think you no longer exist "as a kid".
Jack Rodriguez Thank you, I guess I have to think this over.
Good luck:)
hahahhahhahahahaaha
Ur process of being a child no longer exists ,now u exist as an adult
"I've been living in London for 7 years" is that a correct grammar? If it is correct, what is the difference with "I've lived in London for 7 years"?
+Ranessa Nainggolan
I have same question with this case.
+Ranessa Nainggolan
when you use present perfect "have been" it means that you still live in London.
and when you use simple past "lived" it means you no longer live in London.
+Ranessa Nainggolan it depends on the question being asked. Like if they ask "for how long u've been living in London"?
I have the same doubt
Hello! they are both correct because of the use of "I've". Since "I've" is a contraction of "I have", it's stated that you have been and still are living in London.
However, if you want to say you used to live in london, you would just say "I lived in...". See the difference?
So, "I'VE lived" = have been and still are living
"I lived" = used to be living
How is I have lived in London for 7 yrs different from ,I have been living in London for 7 yrs
I lived in london for 7 years.
Means time-7 yrs complete ho chuka h and action bhi
Ab nhi rh rha london me
@@poojatacoriya2963
I had been living in London for 7 years .
Is it wrong ?
Which one is correct ??
@@SumanSyn I think that is because when you use "have been living", it necessary use since, for example I have living here since 7 year
I have lived in London for 7 years. (I am still living in London)
I have been living in London for 7 years.(I am still living in London)
present perfect focuses on completion while present perfect continuous focuses on continuous activity.
But here they have the same meaning because of the verb 'live'
Hi Archana, You are a great teacher, thank you so much.
Thank you Roshna. You can give very clear explanation about ENGLISH GRAMMAR.
"He has gone to NY 5 times" - shouldn't it be been instead of gone? I mean, to go means to leave and do not come back.
right.. her explanation may be convincing, but it creates confusion. it should be "has been", not "has gone"
In the third sentence you have not specified the time
That is
My uncle went to NY 5 times
Pooja Singla what
What is the difference between "i've lived in London for 7 years" and I've been living in London for 7 years"
Same meaning brother
same question
so when we use "i've lived in London for 7 years"
@@gyansagar139 i have lived means you no more lives there, you are talking about your experience living there but i have been living means you are still living there.. Okk i hope you have understand.now..
@@Uk-foodie07 but at 8:00, she says the sentence means still living in london..
your way of teaching us extraordinary 👍👍👍... Now a hope is built that i can also speak English , and become a master in English 🙂🙂🙂🙂
Rachnaji Really i m very impressed after watching this video , very very easy to understand because u explained both the example together present perfect and past simple ,,,, Thanks a lot make us understand 👍👍👍👍
I have been living in London for 7 years
Very nice to meet you at home with me for the first time we were going on in my head is killing me your 🔢 and I'll be back in a bit of time to
At 15:25 heard that creepy voice 🙄😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I usually prefer to see English lessons with native speakers. But I have to admit that this is the best video about differences between PPS and PS.
Thank you very much!
I do agree
I really love your teaching method.❤️
You are the best teacher on u-tube..I appreciate you...
You have clarified my doubts now by this video which were always striving me as between have/has and past tense uses. Moreover I have grasped from this video that is never/ever/hardly followed by the present perfect tense in the question. Your explain along with examples are incredible to an opsi. Thanks🙏
Please make video for " Have been/has been ".
The best teacher I have ever met
Perfect 😍😍😍😍😍
Perfect 😍😍😍😍
Perfect 😍😍😍
Perfect 😍😍
Perfect 😍
Thank you so much 😘
U'r Explanation is very clear to understand 👍👍very helpful video 💝
Finally i understand it from this video. Excellent projection of concept. Very nice.
I hope this channel will make me better learn in English. Love it.
You are giving such a clear explanation on every topic
Good one. Simple and straightforward. Very good examples to explain all possible scenarios. 👏👏👏
I had some confusion both tenses. I have cleared my all doubts, thanks a lot for your valuable videos.
Your explanation style is very nice
I have never seen a great teacher like you before.
pls continue your teaching. your tutorials are very useful for us.
simply the greatest explanation I've ever seen about present perfect
Your English content like examples and scenarios are very good. Keep it up Ma’am. Thank you very much.
I was stuck between these two tenses , it helped me a lot
Just WOW! Absolutely great explanation!!!!!
Sh is great teacher. Very easy to understand her .
Ma'am, Today u have made my confusion clear. About PPT and PIT
Thanks alot Ma'am
One of the best teacher I have ever saw
You are a good teacher