US Aircraft that should be in War Thunder before the F 117, that aren't

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 97

  • @politicalmonkeyfan
    @politicalmonkeyfan 22 дня назад +53

    i feel most of these planes would've fit it the category of planes thats shouldve came before the F-4C

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  22 дня назад +13

      Indeed, it’s like they skipped 10 years of aviation development

    • @Petboch
      @Petboch 22 дня назад +2

      Question: would it be a good idea to add the vought xf-8u-3 crusader 3?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  21 день назад

      I can't see why not though it was only a prototype

    • @RedTail1-1
      @RedTail1-1 6 дней назад

      ​@@TMSDerp That is literally what they did... They added a few 1970s jets and then immediately jumped right to the 2000s and are now just focusing on 1990s-2010s

  • @imthygamer3566
    @imthygamer3566 20 дней назад +24

    I hate when people ask for more modern jets while the game modes are still like this

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  20 дней назад

      Almost like thinning stuff out doesn’t work

  • @Tir33nts343
    @Tir33nts343 20 дней назад +26

    the fact we dont have the F101 is criminal

  • @czerwony1420
    @czerwony1420 22 дня назад +29

    my top 3
    F-94 Starfire
    son of F-80 father of the F-104, lost a fight to a Po-2
    F2Y Sea Dart
    he float and he sonic boom
    F-106 Delta Dart
    so gigachad it recovered from a flat spine and landed in a field without a pilot

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  21 день назад +5

      F-106 might be coming in another video soon 👀

    • @spartainwarrior6445
      @spartainwarrior6445 18 дней назад +1

      is this snazzy's alt?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  18 дней назад

      @@spartainwarrior6445 Nope I'm my own smol channel :)

    • @spartainwarrior6445
      @spartainwarrior6445 18 дней назад

      @@TMSDerp I’m talking to the other guy

  • @liquidleopard4495
    @liquidleopard4495 16 дней назад +4

    Have we mentioned the F-18? I don't think we've mentioned the F-18 enough.

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  16 дней назад +1

      You right

    • @cookiecracker2
      @cookiecracker2 7 дней назад +2

      What's that? f18? Yeah we really need to talk about the mcdonneldouglas f18! I mean people just don't talk about the f18, as much as they should talk about the f18, we should f18 with the f18 while f18, f18 f18f18f18f18f18f18f18f18f18f18f18

  • @OptiPopulus
    @OptiPopulus 22 дня назад +25

    "Why isn't X vehicle ingame?" can be answered with "Will it make gaijin money as a premium?" and suddenly you see why vehicle additions are so stagnant.

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  21 день назад +6

      Funny thing is most of these def could

    • @cookiecracker2
      @cookiecracker2 7 дней назад +1

      I'm sorry?? HOW could a premium f101, f102, f106, f94, mig25, f18, NOT make gaijin INSANE amounts of money???

  • @oriolguerrero1702
    @oriolguerrero1702 17 дней назад +3

    The Voodoo should almost be a requirement and would fit perfectly between the F-80 and the F-104s, both or either the 4 20mm and the AIM-4 Falcon variants

    • @cookiecracker2
      @cookiecracker2 7 дней назад

      you know it would be garbage right?

    • @bealzabubba
      @bealzabubba 6 дней назад

      They were equipped with nuclear tipped missiles for downing soviet bombers. Canada had them as well as US

  • @PerciusLive
    @PerciusLive 13 дней назад +1

    Still need a TT A6 intruder. At least give us a a early variant if the tram and swip are too powerful. Im still praying for the swip though

  • @antonisashitteragain6993
    @antonisashitteragain6993 14 дней назад +2

    Gaijin loves power creep, so they focus on modern vehicles in order to make new players and those that want to play advance vehicles expend hard money

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  13 дней назад

      Nothing like having people pay for shiny new toys

    • @antonisashitteragain6993
      @antonisashitteragain6993 13 дней назад +1

      @@TMSDerp oh yes, tnx to them is "free", at least

  • @warbird1e1
    @warbird1e1 7 дней назад +2

    I think the B-50 should be added, it's just a better B-29

    • @RedTail1-1
      @RedTail1-1 6 дней назад +1

      They have the B-57 so why haven't they added the B-52 yet?.. They just end the line of Heavies at B-29 and go straight into strategic jet bombers with the B-57 but then it's immediately right into low-level fighter/bombers with the F-105 followed by the F-111A/F and now ends with the Strike Fighter F-15E... I mean, yeah, a B-52 is not going to survive against 10.0-11.0 aircraft but I guarantee people would still play it especially in Sim Battles. I know I would. How awesome would it be to control such a massive aircraft and drop ridiculous amounts of bombs on an airfield?! I think it'd be really fun. Having a radar controlled tail gun would also be very cool and increase survivability in SB since people tend to try and chase rather than attack strategically from other angles.

    • @warbird1e1
      @warbird1e1 6 дней назад

      @RedTail1-1 I do not disagree, but I think the B-50 would be a good add as well

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  6 дней назад

      A lowkey fun one would be the B-58, direct competitor to the YAK 28

  • @KitKat-tj8ds
    @KitKat-tj8ds 2 дня назад +1

    The funniest part of this plane existing is that it goes in a br where Radar isn't in every plane, and radar missiles are SIGNIFICANTLY rarer (in air battle anyway)
    So it's just a slower, worse bomber.
    10/10, amazing.

  • @RedTail1-1
    @RedTail1-1 6 дней назад +2

    My current and main problem with the game is scope creep... They keep adding more and more without polishing what was already there... Without balancing and without decompressing...
    All it takes is looking at a top tier aircraft's secondary weapon menu to see a big problem. Weapons that don't have display names, just shows the text address that the game uses to access weapons via coding.. This is not an actual example but something like 'ir_python_default' for an Israeli Python missile. We're even seeing that problem with actual aircraft names now..
    The game is an absolute mess and rather than focus on polishing the game and fixing bugs they just want to keep adding in new vehicles and weapons... It's all about money money money and they aren't even pretending to hide that fact anymore... With this latest update you can literally pay $80 and get access to a Top Tier jet with RB-99 Active Radar Missiles...

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  6 дней назад

      Why I had the idea for this series

  • @hemlocksalad5383
    @hemlocksalad5383 16 дней назад +1

    this played automatically for me after " The Lorax 1969" Congrats! Happy veterans day 2024

  • @spartainwarrior6445
    @spartainwarrior6445 18 дней назад +3

    F-101A had wiring for external AIM-4s (aim-4s rusted outside of the aircraft mid flight because they're designed for weapons bays LMAO) so that didn't really happen and the 101B was just pure missiles, some had 6 missiles instead of 4, but it depended on the variant of missile used, so yeah we can probably get an AIM-4 armed F-101A if gaijin uses their artistic liberty again (expect it to have 2g of pull on the deck 💀
    it also wasn't too early for 9s, it actually came out after the F-4 but usaf/navy service anger issues happened
    also no F-102/F-106?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  18 дней назад +2

      Yea F-101 is def a weird one when it came to time period also 🤫

  • @hiphip4808
    @hiphip4808 19 дней назад +2

    To give some love to the Soviet Tree in the same vain as this
    Su15
    Il102
    Mig25
    Least those are some of my choices for production aircraft, there are a lot more that we could see
    For prototypes, Ye8 and MiG 1.44 would be pretty cool too

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  19 дней назад

      There is ample material for these types of videos. Can add that to the list tho :)

  • @kingofchris
    @kingofchris 23 дня назад +16

    We already moved on from century series aircraft… and I believe they go back to fill the gaps once we reach the end of the line on aviation with the introduction of the f22, su57, etc, which might be coming by 2025 december update… reason why we have the f117, to test all the stealth gameplay mechanics

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  23 дня назад +6

      Ik the reasoning. I just don’t agree with how they’re doing it

    • @kingofchris
      @kingofchris 23 дня назад +5

      @@TMSDerp I'm with you there, I would have loved to see more early jets as well

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  23 дня назад +2

      There’s many more I plan on covering too

    • @sometoastxd
      @sometoastxd 22 дня назад

      The F-117 is def just a fun thing that they figured people could have some fun with and thats why they made it a squadron vehicle. There is a 0% chance we will see stealth fighters next year given the amount of modern stuff left to go and the fact that Gaijin could not find enough to actually make good models of the F-22 or Su-57. Their documentation requirements simply would not allow it.

    • @kingofchris
      @kingofchris 22 дня назад +1

      @@sometoastxd well, if we consider whats left before stealth fighters, theres not much really… for example before the F35 and f22 in the US techtree, we are only missing the f18 which is 100% coming on december… everything else, are a some upgraded variants of the f18 and f15 that could simply show along 2025… theres simply no other “cool” aviation thing that isnt stealth for 2025 xmas

  • @nirvand7431
    @nirvand7431 18 дней назад +1

    Theres a bunch more planes that could be added, like the delta dart and dagger, even though theyd probably wouldnt do too well in air RB. Also the Jaguar and maybe even the Canuck as a premium since they got away with the F89s.
    the F101A was fitted with guns and though it never loaded the aim-4 it could theoretically carry them.
    The F6U should be higher, maybe 7.7 or 7.3 at the very least, and the F7U is just a large underpowered more maneuverable swift f7 with twice the amount of beam riding missiles so it should share the same BR.

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  18 дней назад

      Just uploaded video with some of the aircraft you mentioned 👀

  • @TheoldSouth
    @TheoldSouth 23 дня назад +11

    What about the F-106 Delta Dart?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  22 дня назад +2

      👀

    • @doubleutubefan5
      @doubleutubefan5 21 день назад +2

      FUN FACT I have a photo of the F106 hanging on the wall in front of me

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  21 день назад +1

      Its a very cool looking delta wing fighter

    • @doubleutubefan5
      @doubleutubefan5 21 день назад

      @@TMSDerp with self landing capabilities

  • @PaulieMcCoy
    @PaulieMcCoy 14 дней назад +2

    they should stop adding modern aircraft; they should have stopped at first generation missile shooting jets.

  • @Flanker_SpankerWT
    @Flanker_SpankerWT 23 дня назад +10

    I need my swiss f18

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  23 дня назад +3

      F-18 prob isn't far away considering the direction war thunder is taking

    • @PorterDeason
      @PorterDeason 23 дня назад +2

      It’s coming in winter update I think

    • @saplingseedsaccrew3143
      @saplingseedsaccrew3143 16 дней назад +1

      F-16A December 2022
      F-15A December 2023
      F-18 hmmm when could the next F-teen Aircraft might come, I wonder

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  16 дней назад +1

      @@saplingseedsaccrew3143 XF-23

    • @liquidleopard4495
      @liquidleopard4495 16 дней назад

      @@TMSDerp They could have had the F-18 a couple of updates ago.

  • @MIIRBH
    @MIIRBH 16 дней назад

    I don't think having the f117 fully stealth would be that op since it doesn't have anti aircraft capabilities

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  16 дней назад

      It is gaijin tho

    • @MIIRBH
      @MIIRBH 16 дней назад +1

      @TMSDerp yeah, the f117 will most likely not have its accurate stealth capabilities so i'm not sure why anyone would actually play it

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  16 дней назад

      @@MIIRBH Clout or "stealth"

  • @anno-fw7xn
    @anno-fw7xn 20 дней назад

    thanks for the video, in my Opionen warthunder shuld have add the f16 mid or end 2025 we have enugh jets to ad in the mean time.
    8:45 are you listeing to the poorhammer podcast?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  20 дней назад

      No, music in background got copyrighted

  • @PorterDeason
    @PorterDeason 23 дня назад +5

    Can’t wait until Germany gets some better aircraft

    • @michaelstodovski2219
      @michaelstodovski2219 23 дня назад +2

      Why u talking about German aircraft in a video about American aircraft? Lol

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  22 дня назад +2

      Will have to do my research on that

    • @paulmiller9767
      @paulmiller9767 22 дня назад +3

      @@michaelstodovski2219we have to remind everyone we are still a tech tree in war thunder

  • @REAPER_WT
    @REAPER_WT 21 день назад +3

    I have to disagree with you. F-117 is a test bed for stealth technology. It has been confirmed they are working on the F-22. Furthermore, adding more century series aircrafts doesn't serve the purpose of filling the gaps, it just adds more unnecessary grind that affects QoL. WWII era is relatively over, I know it has a fan base, and it will continue to have it, they will release some planes from time to time too, but it just doesn't sell as much. This December update expect the following
    USA- F/A-18
    GERM- F/A-18
    Sweden- F/A- 18
    USSR - Either SU-30 or 33
    Maybe we get ECM, if not then early 2025 with EuroFighter and Rafale.

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  21 день назад +1

      Agree to disagree, though if you wanna test bed it don’t put it through a grind/paywall

    • @REAPER_WT
      @REAPER_WT 21 день назад +2

      @@TMSDerp Its placed correctly. Grind for it if you want, pay for it if you want. F-117 is an iconic plane, what do you think people are going to do ;) ?

    • @JohnnyT-JT
      @JohnnyT-JT 21 день назад +2

      F117 is a squadron vehicle. No grind required kinda just be active in a squadron that is also active.

    • @dome2.0
      @dome2.0 20 дней назад

      @@JohnnyT-JT Yeah so still grind, just not an normalgrind. You still have to play quite often to get the full 20k reward.

  • @0Ploxx
    @0Ploxx 9 дней назад +2

    where delta dart?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  8 дней назад

      The next video :)

  • @strategosopsikion8576
    @strategosopsikion8576 18 дней назад +1

    A5

  • @GrenadeAgent
    @GrenadeAgent 6 дней назад

    Well this didn’t age well 😅

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  6 дней назад

      It’ll age just fine being was made well before the update went into the game :)

  • @FarțResidue
    @FarțResidue 21 день назад +1

    f 102/ 106?

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  21 день назад

      Coming soon 👀

  • @warbird1e1
    @warbird1e1 7 дней назад +1

    Sub 406, I got you

  • @Ptfs-y5j
    @Ptfs-y5j 17 дней назад +1

    Bro stop talking i dont need more of a grind

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  17 дней назад +1

      Would actually make the grind somewhat easier

  • @saplingseedsaccrew3143
    @saplingseedsaccrew3143 16 дней назад +1

    Add chapters to your video, I'll timestamp each one if that helps
    Also being serious, just consider the fact that IF Gaijin went and added all these missing jets into the game in a periodic order based on their historical development was to not miss a single vehicle, there would be NO supply of unique planes to add to war thunder for Battlepasses, Premiums, Events, or even just to be able to hand out regularly on the update schedule as a low tier vehicle refresher. I mean last update they added the domestic Swedish P-16 that some guy modeled as a premium for Germany and NO ONE CARES, who is talking about this jet? Everyone already gets frustrated when Gaijin adds a copy pasted aircraft so that would inevitably their solution if they did choose to add all these missing planes before more modern stuff that we already have in game. How stupid would it be to add aircraft by a historical order just so that you can have that one random vehicle that only one person cares about and delay more anticipated jets that people ACTUALLY want because we just have to have the Skibidipoop-2 prototype jet aircraft in game.
    And to people saying, "Gaijin just doesn't add these jets because it doesn't make them MONEY!!!"
    Are you really so inclined to believe that Gaijin's sole purpose through their every move is simply to profit off the players that you just happen ignore all the things they've added to the game that doesn't give them any money such as improved graphics, visual effects, Raytracing support, new weapons, new aircraft in the tech trees and all of this is included in update that's you don't have to pay for in a free game.
    1:40 There's like 5 very similar early navy jet aircraft and this would likely just get folded within the other 3
    4:59 We got the F-4D as an event vehicle which is generally the same concept as this so we'll likely just be waiting on this for a while.
    8:56 Modeling a brand new missile for one unique aircraft would require more work than the average vehicle addition and considering the lack of Cold War interceptor aircraft in game there might be a balancing issue that Gaijin is worried. The missiles are just too terrible to be worthwhile weapons and the engines are too powerful for a low BR so it might just end up turning into an F-104 for low tier. More likely to come than strategic bombers nevertheless.

    • @TMSDerp
      @TMSDerp  16 дней назад

      Chapters are a good idea. And im not saying that they need to go in periodic order with aircraft but I think they're just extending too far with more and more modern aircraft.