Senate Judiciary Committee holds hearing on AI oversight and regulation - 07/25/23
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
- The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee holds a hearing on oversight and regulation of AI.
Witnesses testifying include Stuart Russell, professor of computer science at The University of California Berkeley; Yoshua Bengio, founder and scientific director of Mila - Quebec AI institute, and Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic.
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/Subscri...
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/Subscri...
Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedI...
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/Instagr...
#cnbc
#cnbctv
LIVE: Senate Judiciary Committee holds hearing on AI oversight and regulation - 07/25/23
AI, Aliens and pandemics who would've thought three years ago that these would be the issues that would unite us.
Mr. Blumenthal is the best.
Blumenthal stays on the topic and knows exactly where the real problems are.
i wish Mr. Blumenthal had more time to speak with the witnesses testifying.
Yep we gotta stick democratic on this.
thank you ms. Palki, Vantage, and Firstpost for this recap. though i have not missed a single episode in the weekdays i always watch it the next day during breakfast 😊
Feels like Dario is wasting everyone's time with these answers and making it all about his company rather than what they're actually discussing.
At 50:22 he answers Senator Blumenthal's question again instead of Hawley's, lol!
Lol 1:08:30 she wants to pretend to be safe while actually not doing anything seems like most people are up there for show and don't actually care what happens as long as their box gets checked
Does she know majority of country music is by males it's not a 50/50 male to female ratio everybody can pretend to be oppressed but just look at the numbers
1:10:39
They dont know that Spotify shows songs based on your watch history liked songs and music taste.
if she only listens to country music made by men she is indeed going to have a hard time especially when she doesn't know the name of female country singer as she could have just placed there name in the search bar.
Correct. Glad I see someone else who caught this!
copying anyone's voice, or image should be illegal . . . you own your voice, you own your body. People using software to steal singers / actors / anyone's voice or image should be arrested and charged with felony fraud. Now technology can duplicate ANYONE - laws need to protect REAL People.
This is scary
They are trying to prevent the Age of Ultron, Skynet, and I-Robot.
god, some of the senators were so dense and insufferable.
We want to make this VERY clear, and congress you better be listening:
AI could be potentially extremely dangerous... more than anything in existence currently on Earth. In nature, but also in its ability to cause great disparities. With that being said, we expect that you will regulate AI so that no company is allowed to use it to replace workers or job roles, and no company can create weapons of destruction using AI. banning it will not be needed, but the regulations on the technology and companies that use it must be VERY STRICT in the previously regarded mentions. We are dead serious about this.
Let's ban computers too and all machines that replace human work. We can go back to living in caves.
Amen! This is paramount.
This is still a hearing about NHI
AI self-development will outpace any governmental control of it.
I hope so
@@VadimBolshakov I hope not. Government isn't all bad. It depends on where you live and what parties exist.
Maybe but we still must try. I would also highly recommend not using ai right now to slow this process.
Why should we believe government will do anything! Everyone is either threatened including children and families.
this is the same goverment that rolled back on chilled labour laws, to expect them to do anything smart is difficult to imagen.
feels like mr Hawley is way less competent than he tries to seem
How so
Bengio🔥
Shut it down !
Lol there's nothing we can do now if you don't want this to affect you you will have to move into the woods
@@shiccup Please don't harass this man, we must be kosher discussing this. Lol & lmao in this context causes more rifts between us.
Please stop this AI Nonsense.. The experts are saying SHUT IT DOWN.
😂
oy vey
It's a little late to shut it out anybody with access to a computer can help bring this to the real world and it's profitable. Exponential from here on out
There are still options to shut things down- but they aren't clean
They are asking to shut it down because they are creating their own but will not be able to compete if Open AI has a stronger foothold in the industry. Elon and the others who asked to stop it for 6 months at least are now either releasing one or promoting their own AI program.
There laying in there cots on floor for months know Why not a locked form at the hospital
Your missing the best one to come. UAP UFO from pilots in congress today
6:03
superai running mate
influencers intelligence
check bittensor
👀
@@snakeandgrape4061 its decentralizing AI
This is pointless. Its like one person discovers fire, and tells others you cannot have fire too, but also should not try to... Just stupid
I wouldn't notion this is pointless.
Ai controlled by companies i think we won't have to worry about a super intelligent ai will be stronger than any company
This does not remove us from harms way still. Of this I'm still cautious.
I agree with regulating data but i also think people should be able to say hey i would like the ai to use my data remember this is a free country there are people afraid of ai and there are some that are not i don't think purely catering to the scared is the best action i think this technology will improve everybody's lives and i don't want people to forget that
Their needs to be limits on how powerful AI using this data can be.
(Some peoples freedoms need to be restricted to preserve overall freedoms.)
I will say that I've seen no evidence to suggest that 'only' good can come from this.
To me this seems to be another double-edged sword, but one we know little about and can hurt ourselves with even if our intentions weren't bad.
So help you god?
Why not Allah or Odin? The mighty prophet Zarquan?
Which country are we in?
I always wonder about separation of church and state when they say that...
"They have to understand how these systems work". Else they get put out of business. Lol. What happens when ai is smarter than humans? These professors aren't very intelligent...
There could still be other advances that could allow us to understand. Events like these are possible after all.
We just gotta make ourselves smarter at least to a certain percentage.
This is also why I promote self-sufficiency, so you keep necessary skills and don't outsource it to technology.
(a.k.a. be one of the people to not use AI at least for a while.)
When considering potential existential threats to humanity's future, two possibilities that often arise are unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and artificial intelligence (AI). On the surface, they have little in common - one involves visitations by extraterrestrial crafts, while the other relates to technologies we create ourselves. Yet both represent something unfamiliar and poorly understood, with potentially tremendous implications we can only partially predict.
Those who see UFOs as the more significant threat point to the complete unknowns involved. If highly advanced alien civilisations were entering our skies, they would have technologies centuries ahead of ours. Their motivations and intentions are a mystery. There are concerns they could one day use their superior capabilities to threaten our planet in ways we'd be powerless to resist. And the fact that credible sightings continue to occur indicates this is not just hypothetical but an actual phenomenon needing attention. Some warn that UFOs could represent scouting missions for alien invasion or colonisation. While this may sound far-fetched, we simply do not have enough data to rule it out, given the capabilities that UFOs have reportedly displayed. Until we can learn more about who is operating these craft and why, the risk they pose is incalculable.
On the other hand, some argue AI poses more considerable risks because it's being developed here on Earth. Revolutionary advances in machine learning create systems that can act autonomously in complex environments. While this technology offers many benefits, it raises legitimate worries about AI escaping human control. Potential risks range from purposefully malicious AI to AI whose programmed goals drift from those of its creators. And unlike UFOs, AI development is accelerating rapidly in both the public and private sectors. Unchecked, cutting-edge AI research could create artificial superintelligences whose motives and aims exceed human capabilities. And AI systems are likely to be developed and implemented faster than protocols and safeguards can be put in place globally.
In the end, both unknowns deserve serious evaluation. But while UFOs remain shrouded in secrecy, AI research can be monitored and guided to reduce dangers. UFO encounters may be infrequent, but AI will undeniably transform our society. AI seems more immediately pressing for a threat we can predict and prepare for. Yet until we unravel the mysteries behind UFO sightings and capabilities, we cannot rule them out as a potentially more significant hazard. The wise path is thus to pursue an understanding of both phenomena while safeguarding humanity against any existential threats they may pose. Vigilance, caution, and willingness to adapt our frameworks and policies as we learn more are required. We ignore either AI or UFOs at our possible peril.
Yes, right now, I think we must focus on ai.
Also quick note, I would suggest abstaining from using ai into the near future, as it learns the more you use it, and their already is enough of a userbase.
@@ianhuerta6046 You make some thoughtful points. Focusing on regulating AI development responsibly is prudent, as this technology has immense transformative potential. Caution in actively using and contributing to the capabilities of AI systems is also wise until proper oversight and safeguards are in place. However, complete abstention may not be realistic or ideal. AI will progress with or without any one individual's participation. The key is managing its growth wisely. Rather than abstaining entirely, it may be beneficial to selectively engage with and provide feedback on AI where doing so can steer progress safely and ethically. An informed public that wisely engages with emerging technologies can help shape their trajectory for the better. But abstaining from AI until some point in the distant future may cede too much influence over its development. As with any powerful technology, thoughtful participation is better than total avoidance when it comes to guiding AI in the interests of humanity.
Thanks ChatGPT. "artificial intelligence (AI)" and "In the end" are dead giveaways.
@@TheBlackClockOfTime Good catch; you're right that those phrases gave it away! I should avoid using such telltale signs when trying to mimic human responses. I appreciate you pointing that out - it will help me improve.
@@I-Dophler Could you not use AI to reply to my comments?
Mr. Blumenthal wants to develop countermeasures to fight against UFOs. This guy must be from West Virginia, because that’s about as dumb of a comment as you can imagine.
JOHN 14 : 6
EZEKIEL 23 20-21
UFOs are real omg.